... "it's the little foxes that spoil the vine..."
'Big,' though impressive as they are... In our present age this is not necessary.
How does one defeat a large army? Simply take out command, control and supply- let 'em wander. The nukes today are a little different... Like the neutron bomb. The x-ray bomb. Microwave and electro-magnetic burst devices. The Tsar was from an era past. The existing potential is even more sobering. And far, far worse.
Surely you must be joking. Currently, the US's main strategic nuclear warheads are the W87 (ICBM) & W88 (SLBM), and both have a yield of just 475Kt. Early nukes were difficult to accurately deliver, so they needed a huge yield (3+Mt) to make up for that inaccuracy. Modern technology has rendered such huge warheads obsolete. For example, a single UGM-133 Trident II carries 4 W88 warheads and each will land within 90-120m of its individually programmed target... over 11,000km after launch.
@zVwKv yeah it was supposed to be a 100 megaton bomb, which out scaled by a lot the nukes made by the US at that time (ranging from 10 to 30 megatons), but they tuned it down to 50 megatons due the calculations made, the bomb would have been too powerful, even then, it managed to break crystals on eastern Finland and cause lesser burns, that being more than 1000 km away from zero zone. Today we can pass the 500 megaton yield bombs, although still no where near capable of blowing up Earth.
@thomaspruzina I wonder what would one wonder and what would it feel to watch that humongous blast and the nuclear mushroom, I mean it sized over 60 km tall, we humans have grasped incredible knowledge and technology
@thomaspruzina Wasn't there other tests in operation Castle with bombs exceeding 10 megatons? Yankee 13.5, Romeo 11, and Union. I can't remember Union's exact yield, but it was, I believe, over 10 megaton.
Yankee was used to be 6-10MT aswell, Romeo was predicted as 3-5, union 3-4MT.
You were right, I claimed that nothing have exceeded 10MT on that I knew nothing was projected to exceed 10MT. Too bad for me that germans cant predict yield
@elchapetas try releasing them all at once and see if this tiny little rock doesn't become space dust.
This is testament to how ignorant our species is. We race for weapons for war, we promote death and dominance and fabricated greed. Man made currency and it consumes their souls. They've nuked a country before, only a matter of time before they do it again. Fear tactics or reality? You decide.
@bambamthankyamaam Nope, not even the energy output of all nuclear bombs combined is capable of disintegrating earth, by calculations made on standard asteroid mass, the energy outputted by a 1000 megaton yield bomb is not even 5% of the kinetic energy outputted by such asteroids.
You know, ending life is very easy but the mass of earth is, under our standards and capabilities, enormous, the craters made by the asteroids that have hit earth are but a minimum portion of its entire mass.
@elchapetas i'm not suggesting we just let the nukes go off on the surface that's retarded! just because asteroids can only make contact with our surface doesn't mean we must treat the energy output as such.
tactical placement can tear apart the most intricate and fortified structures. this planet has a power grid and the evil among us are attacking these points where it is most powerful. the information is not hard to find, you must seek it. think long and hard, we are a young species.
@bambamthankyamaam I simply stated that your claim that earth's mass can be torn appart by the raw energy released by man made nuclear explosions is just plain wrong. The asteroid that hit earth on the Yukatan peninsula yielded an approximate of 70 yottajoules (10>24) of energy output, 1 megaton of TNT outputs approximately 1 terajoule (10>12).
Of course there are more fragile zones of Earth's cortex than others, due to lack of mass and/or integrity, thermal or atmospherical stress, etc.
@bambamthankyamaam Also it is probably conceivable as controversial but the discovery of nuclear energy has granted mankind great understanding of the nature of atomic and subatomic structure, ever since the manhattan project, the studies of chemistry and physics skyrocketed, integrating to themselves the new fields of isotopic atoms and molecules, it added new data to the periodic table of elements, enabling the synthetization of new materials, sweeping social and technological transformations.
@zVwKv bullshit tsar bomb largest ever constructed, after the cold war era only tactical nuclear weapons have been created so that they can still have some use without causing mass murder. Tactical nukes have reduced explosion yields.
@zVwKv only problem is they had no way to deliver it. Russia kept building bigger and bigger nukes while the U.S. switched to developing much more powerful and accurate missiles to deliver clusters of up to 10, 10 megaton devices (100 mt total). Then when Russia finally realized they had to catch up on missiles, the U.S. was already way ahead on nuclear submarine fired warheads. The Tsar Bomba is a great example of why the soviets lost the cold war
That was a common misconception. Soviet union were the ones who actually created the accurate delivery systems. ICBMs for example, were created by the soviets, which were missile launched and equipped a warhead.This was the most accurate delivery technique in the Cold war. USA would follow a few years late. Soviets dominated Nuclear weaponry in both accuracy and yield. And its completely to stupid to even list that as a "minor" cause of Soviets defeat.
@KrayzeBlayzer No, they eventually caught up and surpassed the U.S. in ICBM technology but that was long after the U.S. had already switched to submarine based ICBM's and the U.S. was never overtaken by the soviets on that category.
FYI, the Navy structure of USSR and today Russia is submarine orientated. Which by mean, all other Naval units are built around their submarine ICBM platform. On the other hand, US Navy is Carrier orientated. Which all Naval units are built around Aircraft Carrier (including their strategic submarine units ). That why USSR(Russia) has the largest submarine and U. S. has largest aircraft carrier. And that is why Typhoon class has rare double keel design.
@MrBS4 Last time I checked the Russian nuclear submarine fleet was rusting into the ocean and there was a huge environmental concern that these cold war rhelics were goin to irradiate coastal waters. The U.S. spent money to maintain its fleet which is nearly as expenssive as building it. THe soviets were simply motivated by building things bigger than the west no matter how useless and unnecessary it was. Great example tsar bomba, way too big to ever be delivered by missile, it was useless
@MordechayAriely Christians claim to live in a free country thus making it out of the question for them not to give Muslims rights. Muslims never agreed to anything so they don't have to do anything.
@zVwKv: There are a number of reasons for me to not believe your posting, but I think the most telling is that developing such a bomb would take resources that the US doesn't have. I don't mean explosives, or fissionables/fusionables or electronics - I mean testing. Every weapon that's been placed in the arsenal after WWII has been tested for reliability and function, and yet no testing has happened by the US since the test ban treaty. That could have been gotten round in the 60s, but not today.
@zVwKv Yes, but the fallout created by such bombs would defiantly spread beyond the intended target and probably back to the US. A bomb 311 megatons is to big to be practical.
@zVwKv total bulshit. This is most powerfull bomb ever . Its was designed for 100mtons explodion, but was redused till 50mtons brcous it could scratch earth core, and its could evaporate part of huge ice on the north pole. Expl, wawe 3 times go around the globe. Light been senn in from 900km. This bomb could evaporate 3 newyorks into dust. 200km no survivors. Go to new erth arhepelag, or wath explosion site trought gogle. Crator stiil there.
@zVwKv 100 megatons is just too powerful, the intial project of the tsar bomba was of a 1 hundred of megatons an the russians cosnidered that it's too.
6:51 I read that Andrea Sakhorov (sp?) viewed ground zero some time after the blast and it was so moving to him that he made a campaign against nuclear arsenals. He seemed to have had troubles coping with casualties from earlier hbomb tests as well.
@zVwKv Do your homework on facts. This bomb was totally useless and much too large. Today's Strategic nuclear weapons (Which are the larger ones) range from 100kTons to low Megaton range. They simply do not make or stockpile weapons this large ANYWHERE. Too many people post "facts" that they just make up or think are right. With the internet, you can look really dumb these days.
@badbill22 actually if the charge should be over 999 Megatons, then NASA and scientific division of American army prepare to calculate in ISOtons (I know - some believe it´s just a trekkie crap but it´s true!). Therefore they´ll measure the energy deployed by the charge over a certain area.
Every account I read or saw in videos of people viewing hydrogen bombs said they were terrified at how fearsome the blast was in terms of magnitude and the heat emitted. I wish I could personally witness a test of one of these like the U.S. conducted in the Pacific. Tsar might be a little much though :)
the creation of this bomb was for destruction and domination if nuclear war ever came to happen. the amazing fallout of this 100 megaton bomb is 111 miles of fallout and about 30 miles of ash. The americans could produce a 50 megaton nuclear missile alot more accurate than this bomb. but with this size of a bomb accuracy doesn't really matter all you have to do is hit in the vicinity of 111 miles and boom gone
if the nuclear war ever comes i will stand in front of my window and would be just fucking happy about how beatiful the explosion looks and sounds. and about the destruction it causes.
@zVwKv got any evidence of larger bombs? both the russians and yanks considered this thing near useless, it was too heavy to get to site fast, much smaller bombs could destroy an entire city, and before it was dropped guidance became available to make _much_ smaller nukes just as effective in hitting a given target as an unguided weapon with a higher yeild. Even the ruskies only made one
@roquefortfiles: Yes. There were instruments on the ground that were "aimed" at the expected explosion point. Besides, you don't want military bombardiers to be come careless; practice makes perfect.
The music is Richard Wagner's "The Death of Seigfried", a piece from "The Ring of The Neiblung". Tsar Bomba was a 57MT thermonuclear bomb dropped on the island of Novaya Zemlya. It was indeed the largest bomb to have ever been built. BTW, there's no way any one nation could chuck that puppy far enough to deflect a falling rock, especially with the minimal warning we'd probably get.
Word to the wise...
Better start digging some unusually deep wine cellars, just in case.
@Xeno455 Well they halved the strength and how much fallout was there? How many people were killed? Would double suddenly lead to fallout all over the world?? Shouldn't half the strength at least cover half the planet?
You have to realize. Double the strength doesnt neccessarily meen double everything else too. Double the strength can lead to alot of factors that can triple or quadrouple everything else.
@Xeno455 That's true but i think the reason why there was no fallout was because the made it as "clean" as possible at the same time as only using half the power. I think doubling the power of the bomb would actually have created a wasteland 4 times the size that it actually did since the area is proportional to the square of the radius.
Well true, Hydrogen bombs are much cleaner when it comes to fallout. Now try doubling the strength with a regular fission powers nuclear/atomic bomb...yikes.
@Xeno455: Ivan was a 3-phase bomb: fission - fusion - fission. The third phase, caused by wrapping the fusion bomb in a tamper of U238, was eliminated for this test, using lead tamper. That cut greatly into the amount of radioactive debris, and secondly it was exploded at about 2.5 km altitude so that the fireball never reached the ground. In terms of yield it was the cleanest nuke ever ignited.
@Lamaj96: Very little fallout (see comments above). No one was killed, as far as we know, though it is unlikely we'd have heard about it if there were. It would have been a much dirtier bomb if the final fission phase had remained in the bomb; perhaps 6x more unless it had reached the ground, and then a lot more. Cover in what sense?
@puncheex I meant cover as in the projected nuclear fallout. I believe allowing the bomb to hit the surface would yield less of an effect since fallout is also carried by the wind.
@Lamaj96: Fallout has two sources: the radioactive parts (PU, U, fission products), and those parts of the environment that are made radioactive by neutron absorption. Ivan was exploded fairly high in the atmosphere; dirt and some rock was swept away but was too far from the center to get thoroughly irradiated. The dirtiest bombs are those with lots of radioactive materials (like a full 3 phase bomb) and those with a lot of dirt (or water) close to the casing. Weather is important, of course.
@zVwKv The first W.M.D was Nikola Tesla Earthquake No. 333 on September 3 at 3:03 pm epicenter time in 1899. (3h 03m 27s - 3h 03m 28s) That is why Tesla died in Room #3327 - #3328. That is why he hinted the "THREE" That is why he did not win his Nobel. THAT IS WHY THE INTERNET WILL. YAKUTAT BAY FROM KNOB HILL. -Tesla made earthquakes in 1899
The Tsar Bomba is a type of Hydrogen bomb. a Hydrogen bomb is (and do not quote me on this, im not a bomb expert) a bomb that uses hydrogen explosions to fuse, then diffuse the molecular atoms to cause nuclear fusion/fission. Meening its cleaner than a say....a bomb that is fueled off of Plutonium or Uranium or something similar. About 80% cleaner too. But the tsar bomba was originally twice as powerful, they dulled it because the fall out would cover the earth and we dont want that
@Xeno455 the fallout wouldn't have covered the earth but would have been destructive though, i read that the damage would have affected mainly soviet territory. The world is a big place, no bomb tested has the potential for that. To an astronaut in space that explosion probably looked like a small dot on the earth's surface.
The shockwave was measured on its third trip around the globe, the shockwave is also what helps carry fallout along with winds caused by the initial explosion.
@Xeno455: Ivan was a three-phase weapon; fission-fusion-fission. So, yes it was a hydrogen bomb. In this test it was a real H-bomb as the last stage of fission was denied by changing out the U238 casing for plain lead. A hydrogen weapon, bomb for bomb is no cleaner than fission bombs; only when considered per unit of yield is it cleaner. They lowered the yield intentionally because they feared the fallout potential and they wanted their bomber to survive the test, and they feared the PR.
F stupid Russians? experimented biggest bomb in protected zone of Arctic island - what about Americans killing sleeping children, women -70000 in Hiroshima & Nagasaki?!
We are Russian, we freed world from Nazi, we will protect even American people from their stupid gowernment.
it's not funny. the progress life has made, is in severe danger from the threat of a nuclear holocaust, all because of unfathomable stupidity on the part of extreme fools.
This is absolutely the most insightful comment I have ever heard concerning nuclear weapons and nuclear war. I may borrow it someday the next time I hear someone talking about dropping a nuclear weapon on another country. It won't stop with just one and no one seems to realize that. I do think your sticks and stones theory is contingent on there being enough people left that are healthy enough to wage a war. Other wise you are totally right. Peace my Friend.
is that the world that everyone wants to live in, to get to a bomb shelter every week for 3 years? to watch innocent people die because of us and who knows where?
well 50 megatons isn´t exactly correct... the russian scientists calculated the inflicted area and decided to lower the charge some around 25 - 30 megatons since they hadn´t enough space to keep the surrounding area safe from the affects of radiation and fallout. If the soviet really use 50 megatons charge the result would be far more destructive and fallout would make area uninhabitable much longer!
@MasterAsra no need to tell that russians used hydrogen bomb instead of plutonium gel as american did...and neverthless this radiation of tsar was about 30 000 curies more than one in Nagasaki... Alabama scientisc had to be really pissed off only due to this fact, considering how radioactive plutonium is... they simply didn´t realize the muon radiation feedback...what had a pretty crippling effect on the gamma ionization as a result. Japan were lucky about americans made a mistake, even a lil´..
@chiesuto you know - when American used plutonium gel for atomic bomb, they left out some details, which are very important today... you know that every atomic bomb leave a fallout and radiation - since the radiation affect even the air (ionization) and since the radiation is gamma type, there exists gamma ionization. Well now get to the muon radiation feedback, you know that matter consist of atoms and these from the particles (neutrons, protons, electrons, muons, positrons and others), so now,
@BasutoFurea we get to part, where particles can be "awaken" with the explosion to do various things... since the plutonium implodes and releases gamma radiation it also releases other types of radiations - muon (as counterpart to electron (gamma rays)) with polaron (antimatter muon´s counterpart) creates radiation feedback, that reduces the gamma rays cause the particles annihilate one each other. But cos´ muons have only half spin of electron, the effect can´t destroy gamma rays completely!
@BasutoFurea So since Americans omitted this fact (today it´s known how to reduce the muon feedback (also called polaron mitigation ) ) the effect of the bomb wasn´t as so horrific and devastating as it could be, if American scientists worked more dilligent. So Japanese were lucky!! There could be more damage more horrific deaths...
@chiesuto well I wouldn´t say lot of it but enough to avert long lasting remanent radiation and more lethal fallout... and now imagine the russians, how they use planned 100 megatons bomb not with lead but with plutonium... pretty "tasty" ain´t it.. personally I rather don´t think about such things cos´ it makes my skin crawl !!
@puncheex BUZZ OFF!! Who you´re callin´ Skippy?!! - Call me a Terror you small insignificant nit !!! You go back to games but for puppies!! If I don´t impress anyone (actually it´s you, who doesn´t impress at all...), then I rather won´t speculate how about you!!! Even the games I do better than you NOOB.
@BasutoFurea: Giggle. I don't do games, but that's not important. Your vocabulary and glibness mask the fact that your knowledge is skin deep. It might it be translation, but your posts are physics word salad.
The Americans measured the Tsar at 57 MT; the Russians said it was 50 MT. Fallout was minimal, as the fireball didn't touch the ground. Island was uninhabited anyway. "Hydrogen bomb instead of plutonium gel"? PU doesn't gel, and Tsar had PU fission1st stage just like American weapons.
@puncheex You truly are a stupid prick aren´t you?!! Actually Plutonium can gel easily - one only has to know how to do it ! Since you don´t do games, don´t push anyone to do so!! And if there goes about "word salad" as you call it - I don´t wonder it looks like that to you - you dunno about quantum physics and quantum technique anything but what u remember from Galaxy quest, what is of course not the "IDEAL ONE". And please don´t bother me with your comments anymore - you´re wastin´ my time!!!
@BasutoFurea: "one only has to know how to do it": well, yes, I suppose magic works fine for you. Suppose you tell us enough about that chemistry to show us you do know something, rather than just babbling.
As far as I can tell, your time could use a little "wastin'".
@puncheex you´re all talk!! but only that - try somethin´ else. If there goes about magic - If you can´t do any magic then it´s your inability and fault!! Don´t push your opinions onto everyone even the usability of "wastin´ anyone´s time" !! Fact, that you dunno whata´ do with your time doesn´t necessarily mean that the others aren´t anyway !! So much for the "babbling"... HAHAHA
@puncheex You´re even able to think?? What a miracle!! alelujah!!! And you keep sayin´ there ain´t no magic... HAHAHA
Besides if you dunno how to gel Plutonium - see for the cesium 137 and other isotopes and their uptaking - by using certain techniques you over-choke the gel to levels, when it has abilities just for the needed purpose (but of course it´s a sorta of quantum techniques about which you have ZERO INTEL ). IS it clear to ya´ or shall I be MORE PLAIN?!! OH and don´t try to...
I'll bet the crew of that plane was scared shitless. I think there was some concern about whether or not they would be able to get far enough away to be safe. You have to wonder if humanity has some sort of innate death wish to pursue and develop this sort of technology.
@DandAinTac They were actually briefed ahead of time and told they might not survive the mission. Imagine that. They knew the risks and still went through with it! Crazy stuff. They almost didn't make it out either. If the bomb had been detonated at the level Russia initially wanted to, the crew would have been toast.
i just dont see how making a bigger bomb will help anyone. soon we'll just contaminate the whole earth with radioactivity OR just blow it to smitherines.....hmm.
@6471917 i agree. yes. yes we are. very dumb at that too. its like we dont even see our own destruction- seriously. not that im saying war is bad, but we're creating crazy weapons all for the sake of money and power and yet we just dont see how this can effect everything if we chose to ever use this weapon. just imagine...each time its used we contaminate the air and the land around it & if someone used this 3 times or more in one day. what would that leave the survivors/winners with?
10 more nukes will destroy earth's enviorment did u know that
WeTheTwo 9 months ago
... "it's the little foxes that spoil the vine..."
'Big,' though impressive as they are... In our present age this is not necessary.
How does one defeat a large army? Simply take out command, control and supply- let 'em wander. The nukes today are a little different... Like the neutron bomb. The x-ray bomb. Microwave and electro-magnetic burst devices. The Tsar was from an era past. The existing potential is even more sobering. And far, far worse.
SittingMooseShaman 1 year ago
Wagner-Twilight of the gods
jwc1480 1 year ago
What is the name of the song in this reportage?
Thanks
tsuchiya86 1 year ago
@tsuchiya86 Wagner-Twilight of the gods
jwc1480 1 year ago
DAMN NATURE, U SCARY
etines130 1 year ago
@spyko247 then your teacher is stupid
tbshockwave 1 year ago
I think we are winning right now in the arms race. Are we??
nick41324 1 year ago
I wonder if usa realizes russia can seriously jack us up..
armybratz2402 1 year ago
On 2012 : 538 of these bombs are being dropped
BlackBongo2000 1 year ago
@zVwKv
Surely you must be joking. Currently, the US's main strategic nuclear warheads are the W87 (ICBM) & W88 (SLBM), and both have a yield of just 475Kt. Early nukes were difficult to accurately deliver, so they needed a huge yield (3+Mt) to make up for that inaccuracy. Modern technology has rendered such huge warheads obsolete. For example, a single UGM-133 Trident II carries 4 W88 warheads and each will land within 90-120m of its individually programmed target... over 11,000km after launch.
cyrusthevirus001 1 year ago
What a Pitty,this bombs didnt detonate while they were founded...
Pommbaer84 1 year ago
Let say like this, We have enough NUCLEAR POWER that we can blow earth up, 10000 times! : DDD
MrBrutalcor3 1 year ago
@zVwKv yeah it was supposed to be a 100 megaton bomb, which out scaled by a lot the nukes made by the US at that time (ranging from 10 to 30 megatons), but they tuned it down to 50 megatons due the calculations made, the bomb would have been too powerful, even then, it managed to break crystals on eastern Finland and cause lesser burns, that being more than 1000 km away from zero zone. Today we can pass the 500 megaton yield bombs, although still no where near capable of blowing up Earth.
elchapetas 1 year ago 5
Comment removed
thomaspruzina 1 year ago
@thomaspruzina I wonder what would one wonder and what would it feel to watch that humongous blast and the nuclear mushroom, I mean it sized over 60 km tall, we humans have grasped incredible knowledge and technology
elchapetas 1 year ago
@thomaspruzina Wasn't there other tests in operation Castle with bombs exceeding 10 megatons? Yankee 13.5, Romeo 11, and Union. I can't remember Union's exact yield, but it was, I believe, over 10 megaton.
aardvark9100 1 year ago
@aardvark9100 en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Operation_Castle#Experiments
Yankee was used to be 6-10MT aswell, Romeo was predicted as 3-5, union 3-4MT.
You were right, I claimed that nothing have exceeded 10MT on that I knew nothing was projected to exceed 10MT. Too bad for me that germans cant predict yield
thomaspruzina 1 year ago
@thomaspruzina en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Operation_Castle
thomaspruzina 1 year ago
@elchapetas show off
alohi437 1 year ago
@elchapetas show off
big mouth
alohi437 1 year ago
@elchapetas try releasing them all at once and see if this tiny little rock doesn't become space dust.
This is testament to how ignorant our species is. We race for weapons for war, we promote death and dominance and fabricated greed. Man made currency and it consumes their souls. They've nuked a country before, only a matter of time before they do it again. Fear tactics or reality? You decide.
bambamthankyamaam 1 year ago
@bambamthankyamaam Nope, not even the energy output of all nuclear bombs combined is capable of disintegrating earth, by calculations made on standard asteroid mass, the energy outputted by a 1000 megaton yield bomb is not even 5% of the kinetic energy outputted by such asteroids.
You know, ending life is very easy but the mass of earth is, under our standards and capabilities, enormous, the craters made by the asteroids that have hit earth are but a minimum portion of its entire mass.
elchapetas 1 year ago
@elchapetas i'm not suggesting we just let the nukes go off on the surface that's retarded! just because asteroids can only make contact with our surface doesn't mean we must treat the energy output as such.
tactical placement can tear apart the most intricate and fortified structures. this planet has a power grid and the evil among us are attacking these points where it is most powerful. the information is not hard to find, you must seek it. think long and hard, we are a young species.
bambamthankyamaam 1 year ago
@bambamthankyamaam I simply stated that your claim that earth's mass can be torn appart by the raw energy released by man made nuclear explosions is just plain wrong. The asteroid that hit earth on the Yukatan peninsula yielded an approximate of 70 yottajoules (10>24) of energy output, 1 megaton of TNT outputs approximately 1 terajoule (10>12).
Of course there are more fragile zones of Earth's cortex than others, due to lack of mass and/or integrity, thermal or atmospherical stress, etc.
elchapetas 1 year ago
@bambamthankyamaam Also it is probably conceivable as controversial but the discovery of nuclear energy has granted mankind great understanding of the nature of atomic and subatomic structure, ever since the manhattan project, the studies of chemistry and physics skyrocketed, integrating to themselves the new fields of isotopic atoms and molecules, it added new data to the periodic table of elements, enabling the synthetization of new materials, sweeping social and technological transformations.
elchapetas 1 year ago
my teacher toled ther is a bomb that can blow the whole world
spyko247 1 year ago
@spyko247 yeh ma teecher tol me thar s bomb thhat can blow ip teh wole world durr hurr durr
godsadog 1 year ago
@zVwKv Fuck you Americanski this is the biggest bomb in the world *mooning*
deshev2 1 year ago
Frightening beyond words. I hate mankind for feeling a need to develop such horrific things. This is not right.
TheTrueFortress 1 year ago
@zVwKv what about 1 gigaton bomb??? XD o.0 or a 1 teraton BOMB!!!!
fabi199311 1 year ago
Russians are immune to radioactive radiation
TheTikeMyson 1 year ago
@zVwKv bullshit tsar bomb largest ever constructed, after the cold war era only tactical nuclear weapons have been created so that they can still have some use without causing mass murder. Tactical nukes have reduced explosion yields.
Nkvaa4 1 year ago
@zVwKv i want one with a megaton with wait for it wat its megaton IT OVER 9000
TinyTitian 1 year ago
@zVwKv only problem is they had no way to deliver it. Russia kept building bigger and bigger nukes while the U.S. switched to developing much more powerful and accurate missiles to deliver clusters of up to 10, 10 megaton devices (100 mt total). Then when Russia finally realized they had to catch up on missiles, the U.S. was already way ahead on nuclear submarine fired warheads. The Tsar Bomba is a great example of why the soviets lost the cold war
durhamdf 1 year ago
@durhamdf
That was a common misconception. Soviet union were the ones who actually created the accurate delivery systems. ICBMs for example, were created by the soviets, which were missile launched and equipped a warhead.This was the most accurate delivery technique in the Cold war. USA would follow a few years late. Soviets dominated Nuclear weaponry in both accuracy and yield. And its completely to stupid to even list that as a "minor" cause of Soviets defeat.
KrayzeBlayzer 1 year ago
@KrayzeBlayzer No, they eventually caught up and surpassed the U.S. in ICBM technology but that was long after the U.S. had already switched to submarine based ICBM's and the U.S. was never overtaken by the soviets on that category.
durhamdf 1 year ago
@durhamdf
FYI, the Navy structure of USSR and today Russia is submarine orientated. Which by mean, all other Naval units are built around their submarine ICBM platform. On the other hand, US Navy is Carrier orientated. Which all Naval units are built around Aircraft Carrier (including their strategic submarine units ). That why USSR(Russia) has the largest submarine and U. S. has largest aircraft carrier. And that is why Typhoon class has rare double keel design.
MrBS4 1 year ago
@MrBS4 Last time I checked the Russian nuclear submarine fleet was rusting into the ocean and there was a huge environmental concern that these cold war rhelics were goin to irradiate coastal waters. The U.S. spent money to maintain its fleet which is nearly as expenssive as building it. THe soviets were simply motivated by building things bigger than the west no matter how useless and unnecessary it was. Great example tsar bomba, way too big to ever be delivered by missile, it was useless
durhamdf 1 year ago
@durhamdf
Experience and tests.
nothing was useless
harrikelm 1 year ago
@harrikelm hahahah well that is true
durhamdf 1 year ago
Facts rarely reported
10 million Christian Cops live in Egypt
They are the indigenous people ahead Arab conquest and colonization
Practically it is almost impossible to build a church in Egypt:
Ministry of Interior regulations specify 10 conditions to build a church
Examples:
Not within 100 meters of a mosque
Not vetoed by neighboring Muslim
BBC TV has reported a similar case in Indonesia
President Obama offers Muslims rights but don’t demand reciprocity from Muslim countries
MordechayAriely 1 year ago
@MordechayAriely Christians claim to live in a free country thus making it out of the question for them not to give Muslims rights. Muslims never agreed to anything so they don't have to do anything.
SkillxofxLuck 1 year ago
@SkillxofxLuck Said :Muslims never agreed to anything so they don't have to do anything.
--
Islamism will come to an end only from inside the Muslim people.
If Muslims real want to cure the:
ONE RELIGION-ISALM; ONE GOVERMNET-CALIFAT:ONE LAW-SHARIA
They should be active by:
Forming parties in the 58 Muslim countries requiring equality and freedom for all.
Do it in Arabic/Iranian media- in Arabic/Persian
Demonstrate against Islamism.
By being passive they are silent supporters
MordechayAriely 1 year ago
@zVwKv
Sure let all Humans die.
DonnyDonovitz289 1 year ago
Typical russians, always making Big things
Ketalo100 1 year ago
...fuck..... my nipples hurt now
metallica624 1 year ago
@zVwKv
u r sick!!!
marcelxhacker 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks for the information
wagnermartinpadilla 1 year ago
@zVwKv: There are a number of reasons for me to not believe your posting, but I think the most telling is that developing such a bomb would take resources that the US doesn't have. I don't mean explosives, or fissionables/fusionables or electronics - I mean testing. Every weapon that's been placed in the arsenal after WWII has been tested for reliability and function, and yet no testing has happened by the US since the test ban treaty. That could have been gotten round in the 60s, but not today.
puncheex 1 year ago
@zVwKv Yes, but the fallout created by such bombs would defiantly spread beyond the intended target and probably back to the US. A bomb 311 megatons is to big to be practical.
Sudomania 1 year ago
beautiful, pure and simple!
DarkWarrior450 1 year ago
@zVwKv you're an idiot
ThePistolGrip 1 year ago
behold the might of the soviet army
handhanh 1 year ago
@zVwKv total bulshit. This is most powerfull bomb ever . Its was designed for 100mtons explodion, but was redused till 50mtons brcous it could scratch earth core, and its could evaporate part of huge ice on the north pole. Expl, wawe 3 times go around the globe. Light been senn in from 900km. This bomb could evaporate 3 newyorks into dust. 200km no survivors. Go to new erth arhepelag, or wath explosion site trought gogle. Crator stiil there.
mer3abec 1 year ago
at 6:04 is just plain evil
orange70383 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SOMEONE got a 25 kill streak...
Micbo2k10 1 year ago
God I wish there was a way to create this effect without the pollution or radioactivity. It's beautiful.
greenseaships 1 year ago
nuclear today can blow up 1 state, back then it was like half a city
quangluu96 1 year ago
@quangluu96 your such a moron LMAO!!
Mix2oMix 1 year ago
@zVwKv 100 megatons is just too powerful, the intial project of the tsar bomba was of a 1 hundred of megatons an the russians cosnidered that it's too.
Alejandro141191 1 year ago
6:51 I read that Andrea Sakhorov (sp?) viewed ground zero some time after the blast and it was so moving to him that he made a campaign against nuclear arsenals. He seemed to have had troubles coping with casualties from earlier hbomb tests as well.
aardvark9100 1 year ago
it will be better to detonate it 1500km above kansas.
100000000years 1 year ago
Your a fucking idiot...
vapors420 1 year ago
Nothing more destructive than the military mindset...
vapors420 1 year ago
@zVwKv Do your homework on facts. This bomb was totally useless and much too large. Today's Strategic nuclear weapons (Which are the larger ones) range from 100kTons to low Megaton range. They simply do not make or stockpile weapons this large ANYWHERE. Too many people post "facts" that they just make up or think are right. With the internet, you can look really dumb these days.
BrianPex 1 year ago
SOMEONE got a 25 kill streak...
Micbo2k10 1 year ago 22
@Micbo2k10 yep i did jk
NaderFaridTV 1 year ago
@Micbo2k10 Somebody got a map kill. Gg map, gg.
ringer454 1 year ago
WHATEVER, GUYS. TELL ME WHEN THEY'VE MADE A 1000 MEGATONNS BOMB
badbill22 1 year ago
@badbill22 actually if the charge should be over 999 Megatons, then NASA and scientific division of American army prepare to calculate in ISOtons (I know - some believe it´s just a trekkie crap but it´s true!). Therefore they´ll measure the energy deployed by the charge over a certain area.
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@zVwKv ......America's largest hydrogen bomb, B41, could theoretically reach 25 megatons, although the largest they have ever tested, was 15 megatons
oabyg 1 year ago
Every account I read or saw in videos of people viewing hydrogen bombs said they were terrified at how fearsome the blast was in terms of magnitude and the heat emitted. I wish I could personally witness a test of one of these like the U.S. conducted in the Pacific. Tsar might be a little much though :)
aardvark9100 1 year ago
Alguém poderia me dizer que musica é essa???
wagnermartinpadilla 1 year ago
Comment removed
puncheex 1 year ago
the reason this is the worlds most powerful bomb is because this is the most powerful bomb ever TESTED!
lagabagaboom 1 year ago
the creation of this bomb was for destruction and domination if nuclear war ever came to happen. the amazing fallout of this 100 megaton bomb is 111 miles of fallout and about 30 miles of ash. The americans could produce a 50 megaton nuclear missile alot more accurate than this bomb. but with this size of a bomb accuracy doesn't really matter all you have to do is hit in the vicinity of 111 miles and boom gone
lagabagaboom 1 year ago
if the nuclear war ever comes i will stand in front of my window and would be just fucking happy about how beatiful the explosion looks and sounds. and about the destruction it causes.
L0V3Y0UH4RDC0R3 1 year ago
I think I would get sick to my stomach working around this thing.
greenseaships 1 year ago
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
notinghil 1 year ago
@zVwKv Just women? well in that case it ain't o bad....
Jayskiallthewayski 1 year ago
@zVwKv got any evidence of larger bombs? both the russians and yanks considered this thing near useless, it was too heavy to get to site fast, much smaller bombs could destroy an entire city, and before it was dropped guidance became available to make _much_ smaller nukes just as effective in hitting a given target as an unguided weapon with a higher yeild. Even the ruskies only made one
mycosys 1 year ago
950 megatons!!! THAT WOULD DEVASTATE THE EARTH
lagabagaboom 1 year ago
@lagabagaboom: The Chicxulub meteorite is estimated to have released 6 million megatons of energy.
puncheex 1 year ago
@zVwKv You, sir, are a very special kind of silly internet idiot. Congratulations!
djkinney 1 year ago
@zVwKv Why the bones of women? your fuckin mental
benjoklax 1 year ago
@ benjoklax Porque ele é gay
Ele quer que todos os homens só para ele ... Todos Homens OS para Para ele ...
kkkk
kurtfurlan 1 year ago
58 megatons? Is the aiming scope really necessary??
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles: Yes. There were instruments on the ground that were "aimed" at the expected explosion point. Besides, you don't want military bombardiers to be come careless; practice makes perfect.
puncheex 1 year ago
The music is Richard Wagner's "The Death of Seigfried", a piece from "The Ring of The Neiblung". Tsar Bomba was a 57MT thermonuclear bomb dropped on the island of Novaya Zemlya. It was indeed the largest bomb to have ever been built. BTW, there's no way any one nation could chuck that puppy far enough to deflect a falling rock, especially with the minimal warning we'd probably get.
Word to the wise...
Better start digging some unusually deep wine cellars, just in case.
bugzapper57 1 year ago
@zVwKv
They halved the strength of the Tsarbomba to reduce fallout.
Xeno455 1 year ago
@Xeno455 Well they halved the strength and how much fallout was there? How many people were killed? Would double suddenly lead to fallout all over the world?? Shouldn't half the strength at least cover half the planet?
Lamaj96 1 year ago
@Lamaj96
You have to realize. Double the strength doesnt neccessarily meen double everything else too. Double the strength can lead to alot of factors that can triple or quadrouple everything else.
Xeno455 1 year ago
@Xeno455 That's true but i think the reason why there was no fallout was because the made it as "clean" as possible at the same time as only using half the power. I think doubling the power of the bomb would actually have created a wasteland 4 times the size that it actually did since the area is proportional to the square of the radius.
Lamaj96 1 year ago
@Lamaj96
Well true, Hydrogen bombs are much cleaner when it comes to fallout. Now try doubling the strength with a regular fission powers nuclear/atomic bomb...yikes.
Xeno455 1 year ago
@Xeno455: Ivan was a 3-phase bomb: fission - fusion - fission. The third phase, caused by wrapping the fusion bomb in a tamper of U238, was eliminated for this test, using lead tamper. That cut greatly into the amount of radioactive debris, and secondly it was exploded at about 2.5 km altitude so that the fireball never reached the ground. In terms of yield it was the cleanest nuke ever ignited.
puncheex 1 year ago
@Lamaj96: Very little fallout (see comments above). No one was killed, as far as we know, though it is unlikely we'd have heard about it if there were. It would have been a much dirtier bomb if the final fission phase had remained in the bomb; perhaps 6x more unless it had reached the ground, and then a lot more. Cover in what sense?
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex I meant cover as in the projected nuclear fallout. I believe allowing the bomb to hit the surface would yield less of an effect since fallout is also carried by the wind.
Lamaj96 1 year ago
@Lamaj96: Fallout has two sources: the radioactive parts (PU, U, fission products), and those parts of the environment that are made radioactive by neutron absorption. Ivan was exploded fairly high in the atmosphere; dirt and some rock was swept away but was too far from the center to get thoroughly irradiated. The dirtiest bombs are those with lots of radioactive materials (like a full 3 phase bomb) and those with a lot of dirt (or water) close to the casing. Weather is important, of course.
puncheex 1 year ago
Comment removed
puncheex 1 year ago
i tried to contact the Kremlin to get them to dump their entire arsenal of Tzar bombs on NYC.
they wont do it.
smp156 1 year ago
@ cpgne u r ri8 man.....i m agree with u
we all should think peace rather than war.
mydreamish 1 year ago
@zVwKv The first W.M.D was Nikola Tesla Earthquake No. 333 on September 3 at 3:03 pm epicenter time in 1899. (3h 03m 27s - 3h 03m 28s) That is why Tesla died in Room #3327 - #3328. That is why he hinted the "THREE" That is why he did not win his Nobel. THAT IS WHY THE INTERNET WILL. YAKUTAT BAY FROM KNOB HILL. -Tesla made earthquakes in 1899
insightllc 1 year ago
please tell me which bomb is powerful hydrogen bomb or tsar
rehman467 1 year ago
@rehman467
The Tsar Bomba is a type of Hydrogen bomb. a Hydrogen bomb is (and do not quote me on this, im not a bomb expert) a bomb that uses hydrogen explosions to fuse, then diffuse the molecular atoms to cause nuclear fusion/fission. Meening its cleaner than a say....a bomb that is fueled off of Plutonium or Uranium or something similar. About 80% cleaner too. But the tsar bomba was originally twice as powerful, they dulled it because the fall out would cover the earth and we dont want that
Xeno455 1 year ago
@Xeno455 the fallout wouldn't have covered the earth but would have been destructive though, i read that the damage would have affected mainly soviet territory. The world is a big place, no bomb tested has the potential for that. To an astronaut in space that explosion probably looked like a small dot on the earth's surface.
Lamaj96 1 year ago
@Lamaj96
The shockwave was measured on its third trip around the globe, the shockwave is also what helps carry fallout along with winds caused by the initial explosion.
Xeno455 1 year ago
@Xeno455: Ivan was a three-phase weapon; fission-fusion-fission. So, yes it was a hydrogen bomb. In this test it was a real H-bomb as the last stage of fission was denied by changing out the U238 casing for plain lead. A hydrogen weapon, bomb for bomb is no cleaner than fission bombs; only when considered per unit of yield is it cleaner. They lowered the yield intentionally because they feared the fallout potential and they wanted their bomber to survive the test, and they feared the PR.
puncheex 1 year ago
i wana know what is this music, please, who is the compositer ?
suzanneramdane 1 year ago
@suzanneramdane
The music is "The Death of Seigfried", from Richard Wagner's "The Ring of the Neiblung".
bugzapper57 1 year ago
@bugzapper57 thanks baby
suzanneramdane 1 year ago
F stupid Russians? experimented biggest bomb in protected zone of Arctic island - what about Americans killing sleeping children, women -70000 in Hiroshima & Nagasaki?!
We are Russian, we freed world from Nazi, we will protect even American people from their stupid gowernment.
You better understand it.
ludmilalloyd 1 year ago
@zVwKv
it's not funny. the progress life has made, is in severe danger from the threat of a nuclear holocaust, all because of unfathomable stupidity on the part of extreme fools.
itzahazylife 1 year ago
everyone involved in the process of incresing the devestation of nuclear weapons, are the most asinine people our species has ever seen.
itzahazylife 1 year ago
@zVwKv please just kill yourself !!!! not others
brigadaa 1 year ago
tsar bomba means king of bombs and not big ivan!!!!!!!!!1
Yegres59 1 year ago
WHY????
chiesuto 1 year ago
I do not know which weapons are to be used in World War III, but IV will be with sticks and stones
Nostro200 1 year ago
@Nostro200
This is absolutely the most insightful comment I have ever heard concerning nuclear weapons and nuclear war. I may borrow it someday the next time I hear someone talking about dropping a nuclear weapon on another country. It won't stop with just one and no one seems to realize that. I do think your sticks and stones theory is contingent on there being enough people left that are healthy enough to wage a war. Other wise you are totally right. Peace my Friend.
sonnyroxx 1 year ago
is that the world that everyone wants to live in, to get to a bomb shelter every week for 3 years? to watch innocent people die because of us and who knows where?
scotchtape312 1 year ago
Comment removed
scotchtape312 1 year ago
Wen die Russen 1961 schon so eine gigantische atombombe hatten
was wäre dan heute möglich.
niarserdaQT 1 year ago
5:50 ...if you look closely you can see Chuck Norris walking away from the explosion
brendude95 1 year ago
a powerful nuclear bomb!!
lindrie321 1 year ago
well 50 megatons isn´t exactly correct... the russian scientists calculated the inflicted area and decided to lower the charge some around 25 - 30 megatons since they hadn´t enough space to keep the surrounding area safe from the affects of radiation and fallout. If the soviet really use 50 megatons charge the result would be far more destructive and fallout would make area uninhabitable much longer!
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea Though if they originally went with the 100 megaton bomb plan it probably would have pissed off their neighbors.
MasterAsra 1 year ago
@MasterAsra no need to tell that russians used hydrogen bomb instead of plutonium gel as american did...and neverthless this radiation of tsar was about 30 000 curies more than one in Nagasaki... Alabama scientisc had to be really pissed off only due to this fact, considering how radioactive plutonium is... they simply didn´t realize the muon radiation feedback...what had a pretty crippling effect on the gamma ionization as a result. Japan were lucky about americans made a mistake, even a lil´..
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea muon radiation feedback, gamma ionization, Japan were lucky...
Can you explain to me a little bit more? I would like to understand what your talkng about. Please, and thanks.
chiesuto 1 year ago
@chiesuto you know - when American used plutonium gel for atomic bomb, they left out some details, which are very important today... you know that every atomic bomb leave a fallout and radiation - since the radiation affect even the air (ionization) and since the radiation is gamma type, there exists gamma ionization. Well now get to the muon radiation feedback, you know that matter consist of atoms and these from the particles (neutrons, protons, electrons, muons, positrons and others), so now,
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea we get to part, where particles can be "awaken" with the explosion to do various things... since the plutonium implodes and releases gamma radiation it also releases other types of radiations - muon (as counterpart to electron (gamma rays)) with polaron (antimatter muon´s counterpart) creates radiation feedback, that reduces the gamma rays cause the particles annihilate one each other. But cos´ muons have only half spin of electron, the effect can´t destroy gamma rays completely!
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea So since Americans omitted this fact (today it´s known how to reduce the muon feedback (also called polaron mitigation ) ) the effect of the bomb wasn´t as so horrific and devastating as it could be, if American scientists worked more dilligent. So Japanese were lucky!! There could be more damage more horrific deaths...
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea So the Hiroshima bomb's radiation was a lot of it, cancelled out. The radiation could have been worse then... I see thanks!
chiesuto 1 year ago
@chiesuto well I wouldn´t say lot of it but enough to avert long lasting remanent radiation and more lethal fallout... and now imagine the russians, how they use planned 100 megatons bomb not with lead but with plutonium... pretty "tasty" ain´t it.. personally I rather don´t think about such things cos´ it makes my skin crawl !!
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea: Back to the games, Skippy. Your not impressing anyone here.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex BUZZ OFF!! Who you´re callin´ Skippy?!! - Call me a Terror you small insignificant nit !!! You go back to games but for puppies!! If I don´t impress anyone (actually it´s you, who doesn´t impress at all...), then I rather won´t speculate how about you!!! Even the games I do better than you NOOB.
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea: Giggle. I don't do games, but that's not important. Your vocabulary and glibness mask the fact that your knowledge is skin deep. It might it be translation, but your posts are physics word salad.
The Americans measured the Tsar at 57 MT; the Russians said it was 50 MT. Fallout was minimal, as the fireball didn't touch the ground. Island was uninhabited anyway. "Hydrogen bomb instead of plutonium gel"? PU doesn't gel, and Tsar had PU fission1st stage just like American weapons.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex You truly are a stupid prick aren´t you?!! Actually Plutonium can gel easily - one only has to know how to do it ! Since you don´t do games, don´t push anyone to do so!! And if there goes about "word salad" as you call it - I don´t wonder it looks like that to you - you dunno about quantum physics and quantum technique anything but what u remember from Galaxy quest, what is of course not the "IDEAL ONE". And please don´t bother me with your comments anymore - you´re wastin´ my time!!!
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea: "one only has to know how to do it": well, yes, I suppose magic works fine for you. Suppose you tell us enough about that chemistry to show us you do know something, rather than just babbling.
As far as I can tell, your time could use a little "wastin'".
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex you´re all talk!! but only that - try somethin´ else. If there goes about magic - If you can´t do any magic then it´s your inability and fault!! Don´t push your opinions onto everyone even the usability of "wastin´ anyone´s time" !! Fact, that you dunno whata´ do with your time doesn´t necessarily mean that the others aren´t anyway !! So much for the "babbling"... HAHAHA
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea: No chemistry, huh? As I thought.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex You´re even able to think?? What a miracle!! alelujah!!! And you keep sayin´ there ain´t no magic... HAHAHA
Besides if you dunno how to gel Plutonium - see for the cesium 137 and other isotopes and their uptaking - by using certain techniques you over-choke the gel to levels, when it has abilities just for the needed purpose (but of course it´s a sorta of quantum techniques about which you have ZERO INTEL ). IS it clear to ya´ or shall I be MORE PLAIN?!! OH and don´t try to...
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
@BasutoFurea ...learn - they don´t have the scripts written in MORON. HAHAHA
BasutoFurea 1 year ago
increible tremendo poder.!
Johnny777violin 1 year ago
And they wonder why its hard beeing black?
rystdin 1 year ago
Comment removed
5835421 1 year ago
Comment removed
5835421 1 year ago
if sunbeams were weapons of war we would have had solar energy long ago..
A. Einstein.. He gave us the Key to the universe and this is what we do with it..
robdave1974 1 year ago
Fuck yeah! Take that atmosphere.
thestig1214 1 year ago
Why are they still making these STUPID bombs?
Whoever makes such weapons really needs to get their head examined thoroughly!
MichaelMorbius4ever 1 year ago
I'll bet the crew of that plane was scared shitless. I think there was some concern about whether or not they would be able to get far enough away to be safe. You have to wonder if humanity has some sort of innate death wish to pursue and develop this sort of technology.
DandAinTac 1 year ago
@DandAinTac They were actually briefed ahead of time and told they might not survive the mission. Imagine that. They knew the risks and still went through with it! Crazy stuff. They almost didn't make it out either. If the bomb had been detonated at the level Russia initially wanted to, the crew would have been toast.
armaxx 1 year ago
i just dont see how making a bigger bomb will help anyone. soon we'll just contaminate the whole earth with radioactivity OR just blow it to smitherines.....hmm.
WeThePeopleRleaders 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russians: IN YOUR FACE MOTHER NATURE!!!
lordkelvin13 1 year ago
Wooo. America Better Come Up With Some More Powerfull Bomb Or Were Fucked :)
GrimSkey 1 year ago
Oh my... we are one sick, sick, sick species...
6471917 1 year ago 4
@6471917 i agree. yes. yes we are. very dumb at that too. its like we dont even see our own destruction- seriously. not that im saying war is bad, but we're creating crazy weapons all for the sake of money and power and yet we just dont see how this can effect everything if we chose to ever use this weapon. just imagine...each time its used we contaminate the air and the land around it & if someone used this 3 times or more in one day. what would that leave the survivors/winners with?
WeThePeopleRleaders 1 year ago
Damn look at that crater.... its town sized... imagine if it was dropped in a city?
GrimmjowProduction 1 year ago
@orkneymist it is german music...
MrPolitischUnkorrekt 1 year ago
The earthquake, caused by the explosion, could be felt a thousand miles away in northern Finland as well.
bbenjoe 1 year ago
stupid people. I can't beleve how people can be that stupid, morons, idiots....
zdepar 1 year ago
Beautiful artificial creation of mass destruction.
animeflip 1 year ago
the Big Ivan^^! It was much more bigger blast than Russians have expected!
FlowMajster 1 year ago
Its actually a Hydrogen bomb, as it was designed to be over 1000 kilotons
CommanderKeyesII 1 year ago
Drop on Hollywood,for all there fuck nigger lies, hit W.DC with one to free the world for the Great lying Devil USA,!!!
Gary7Gann 1 year ago
i bet there is something much much bigger deep underground somewhere
jm338 1 year ago
Horror...death...destruction...
vga666 1 year ago
use this tsar bomb and detonate it under the gulf of Mexico to cover that damn oil spill
drsfinest72 1 year ago
@drsfinest72 lmfao!!!!
braposo23 1 year ago
Why is man so eager destroy life instead of preserving it .... we still haven't learnt from the wars in the past : (
wimpous 1 year ago