@bakulbharadwaj, you're wrong! That's supersonic. Sound barrier travels faster than transoniic and that F-18 fighter jet wasn't flying at Panasonic speed. It's a supersonic jet.
JONES BEACH AND NO IT WASNT SUPERSONIC UGHHH OK PEOPLE BEFORE YOU POST VIDEOS DO YOUR HOMEWORK ITS SUBSONIC THEY EVEN SAY IT AT AIR SHOWS THE HIGH SPEED PASS IS JUST BELOW SUPERSONIC THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER SO ITS .99!!
C00L 1 Your reading my comment 2 Now your saying/thinking thats a stupid fact 4 You didnt notice that i skiped 3. 5 Your checking it now. 6Your smiling. 7. Your still reading my comment. 8 You know all you have read is true. 10. You didnt notice that I skipped 9. 11. Your checking it now. 12. You didn't notice there are only 10 facts Copy and paste to 1 video, tomorrow will be the best day ever no matter what!
just to clear something up, a vapor cloud has nothing to do with breaking the sound barrier, it happens when theres a sudden drop in air pressure around the jet, this guy was flirting with mach 1
Depends on the duration. The average human can usually survive G loads in excess of 20 Gs, but that is just instantaneous Gs. Its about the limit at which your internal organs begin to tear away from their internal attachment points. Sustained Gs, however, the average Joe can usually only maintain consciousness up to just under 4 Gs. Beyond that, without proper physical conditioning and muscular techniques, blood no longer feeds oxygen to your brain and you lose consciousness.
actually no...the record is offically happened in June 1951 where John Paul Stapp survived a 46 g deceleration. Look it up on some historical military sites.
That pass was prolly .97 or .98 mach. He didnt break it but it was about as close as you get. I just saw one do a pass similar to that at the Kansas City Air Expo.
Really? Now that I compare enough vids I see your point...the only thing I question is that the pilot of the Super Hornet at the KC Air Expo told me himself that it was the closest pass he had ever done nearing the speed of sound. He told me that they were flying at about .99 or .98 mach. That was where I was led to believe that he was doing the same. Thanks for the response though.
yea, didnt break sound barrier, they arent legally able to do it inless over oceans, or above i belive 30,000 feet, because once it does, it can cause windows to explode
Yep....ive heard a sonic boom twice...once in nevada over the desert and once in colorado. The pilot at the kc air expo told me that he came about as close as you can get to booming the airport. Anyway I know that guy who left the comment saying that he wasnt going over 450 kts dosent know much about what he is talking about.
As a naval aviation specialist, I know that this F/A-18 Hornet DID NOT break the sound barrier! If it would have, a distinct sonic "boom" would have been audible as it flew by. It came close though, travelling at "transonic" speeds probably about mach 0.8. The vapor cloud that you see is technically known as "Prandtl-Glauert singularity", the point at which a sudden drop in air pressure occurs causing a visible condensation cloud also known as a "vapor cone", "shock-collar" or "shock egg".
Knighthis, Where did you see an F-18F up here two weeks ago??? I was just at the Mcchord Airshow and the F-18 got the cloud to form and it was awsome!!! Missed the picture by a split second. Was it at olympia? Cuz that was a F-18C and I didnt see a cloud form. So just when and where did you see an F-18F up here get cleared to do a high speed pass?
They are not allowed to break the sound barrier at shows like this. It would break windows and ear drums.
The jets is going about .98 mach. The pressure wave is building up as the air is compressed by the speed and can't get out of the way fast enough. This high pressure are causes the condensation so you can see it.
I just saw this yesterday in Tacoma Washington when an F/A-18F did a high speed pass just like this.
Yup. No sonic booms over the continental United States unless in restricted military zones.
And morons who say "you wouldn't be able to catch it on camera," just try faster then. And a cloud doesn't necessarily form during a sonic boom. It can form whenever the airciraft and surrounding air heat up to a certain point to form a vapor cloud.
It doesn't always blow ear drums, I was at RAAF Tindal when an F-111 went supersonic down the runway for a camera crew, just sounded like a giant blanket being ripped then a big bang, no louder though then firing a shotgun from your shoulder.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wow. You guys just don't understand. This took place at Oceana NAS in VA Beach. The weather moisture out there is PERFECT for condensation. This F-18 was not breaking the sound barrier at all. Due to high speed the aircraft generated moisture on the fuselage.
No sir, that is the sound barrier being broken. Notice how you can't hear the plane until it's already gone by a bit? Yeah... Out running it's own sound.
The guy said he never broke it, he was flirtin with it. Yeah right. The telltale sign you broke the sound barrier is the noise and smokey white disfigurement coming off the back of the plane.
No sonic boom, so it's pretty obviously not. Even the guy in the background on the video realizes that. The condensation cloud happens when humid air is rapidly decompressed behind the high pressure nose-wake of the plane. It doesn't require transonic flight. Supersonic condensation clouds usually appear *entirely* behind the plane. Search for "F-18 goes supersonic" to see one.
I suggest you research the sound barrier, and get a better source for aircraft ID. This FA-18C built by Boeing, did not break the sound barrier. It did reach transonic speed, at which the Prandtl- Glauert Singularity occurs, under the correct atmospheric conditions. No boom boom, no sound barrier end.
I think its strange that some define a visual event, with an audio interpretation. What the hell this is youtube, and I enjoy some of the theories. Its like, physics taught by Cheech & Chong.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
goodness i cant belive ive come across a chatroom of nerds who say and or claim they know everything *rings a bell* yu dont
by the way no one cares about sounds barriers and no1 wants too know what any of you have too say if you enjoy fighting on youtube *laughs a little* then clearly you have no friends and your mmother left you when you were a child for a man prostitue
thats deff not ah sonic boom..thats just ah cone formed from the moisture in the air u cant break the sound barrier over land! unless other wise told to
i don't get you idiots on youtube it's more of an intelect war with you M.I.T wannabees do you guys just look at videos and anylize the physics all day and argue like a bunch of yancie school girls all day.....GET A FUCKING GIRL! MATE you will have all the arguing your little over achieving heart desires trust me
Wow! You join YouTube 17 days ago and suddenly you know everything there is to know about people on YouTube?! We are discussing videos, numbnuts! If you lack the mental capacity to keep up, then...don't go away mad...just go away. Clear enough for you?
Ummm...no. It was a common saying long before any hair band used it in a song. It took you 5 months to come up with that response. Honestly, there is nothing funnier to watch than someone making a post just to tell others to stop posting because what we are saying somehow got his panties in a wad.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I love stupid people. You can't see sound. Nor is there a sound barrier. The sound barrier people refer to is a myth conjured up prior to the time when man was capable of faster than sound flight. It was believed time would cease to exist and or some wierd occurence would occur when you exceeded the speed of sound. What you see sorrounding the F-18 is called a compression wave that occurs on subsonic (slower airspeed than supersonic for the slow people) aircraft when high humidity is present.
hahahahah ur definately one of the stupid people u speak of everything u said is false except for the aircraft ur referring to F-18 i dont know were u got ur information from but whoever gave it to u should kill themselves and there family friends and pets u should never post a comment on youtube again there should be penalties u get for stupid comments like your sentenced to 1 month of no comments u should just get the electric chair... MORON!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If I am so stupid then why haven't you whom claims to be smarter are incapable of coming up with a statement that contradicts my comment. Oh, thats right you don't know the truth you don't have a clue what to say because you have no degree in Aviation from henderson state university. My B.S. in Aviation proffesional pilot track is where I got my info. You have no credintials to counter that little kid. Go get educated before you involve yourself in adult conversations.
u said there was no sound barrier.. what kind of aviation degree do u have?? the statements u made were dumb and i believe ur lying about ur so called aviation degree. i like how everybody is giving u a thumbs down on ur last comment lol and i think 21 is pretty far from a little kid so go fuck urself assassyn douche
well, the sound barrier isn't exactly a MYTH, but it's kind of more like an imaginary thing used to describe moving faster than sound easier. This guy was flying at transonic speed, which is at the speed of sound. when you say "time would cease to exist" that was when they were talking about the speed of LIGHT.
Hey everyone. I am the one who filmed this F-18 in Sept. 2004 at the Oceana NAS airshow.
I just stumbled across this and laughed at the ignorance of this poster of my vid. Get this as I'll only write it once.....
HE DID NOT BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER! It was only a high speed pass at the airshow. Even the person who I caught on audio standing next to me said, "he never broke it, but he was flirtin' with it." What more needed to be said?
I know what its capabilities are, dude. I'm just saying that the F-18 in this particular video is not flying at supersonic speed. I've heard lots of sonic booms in my career, and that's not one of them. ;)
No, but you do say in the description something about it breaking the sound barrier. ;) Maybe you should say something like "Look at the wake turbulence cloud being formed around this F-18 as it passes at subsonic speed." Heh...I guess it doesn't have the same ring to it...kinda boring. Its cool though, man, its just a video. :D
Nah, its really not a problem, Andre. Just wanted to keep you from being totally misled. There are lots of these kinds of vids on the internet. There is one real one though, I'll see if I can dig up the link so you can see and hear what it really looks like.
That was not over land in the video I linked, it was over the ocean. Aircraft travel at supersonic speeds all the time over land though, just in restricted areas. The Space Shuttle reentry was my "alarm clock" on several occasions at Edwards AFB.
It's illegal to The airforce in holland to break a sound barrier. Last night we had one. I'd never heard it before. Half the city called the emergency number they thought it was an explosion.
Oh boy, loookeee here, another Sukhoi worshiper. Too bad they didn't get to launch their R-73s or 77s 'cause we'd have taken out their crappy carriers and decrepit airfields.
Okay dumbnuts, find one "formidable opponent" who has launched R-73s/77s at us "and have lived to tell about it" then post a video about it. That's right, there's none, even the trash flown by the Russians.
No, I'm not "dreaming". Learn more English before running your mouth. I said "We'd have" for "We would have", in prepositional tense. Hasn't happened yet, but we could have if we needed to.
"Sarcasm" my ass. You really believe Russian-made systems and even training are worth anything, which is pathetic, but go ahead and fool yourself.
And no, dumbass, saying "we'd + have" turns "we had" from 'past tense' into 'future prepositional'; not a "prediction" but a "statement of possibility".
I wasn't born in the USA and even I learned that much.
As for my "brain can't think" question, it's not "isn't it huh" but "can it, huh".
LOL! Once again you ignored the "have". Okay let me word it out, okay, "we had have" is how it comes out.
It's called "American English" confined by YouTube limits, which is better than your broken attempt. Say it fast enough & it comes out as "we'd have"; a perfectly acceptable use for conversation.
But, I doubt Русский fans like you can work at that level, no?
LOL good luck too, finding a new tutor! Your old teachers indeed wasted your time.
Of course had and would are different. One is regular past tense and the other is irregular future prepositional. Meanwhile you're still stuck on regular tenses.
Nobody says, "I'll help you if I could", Would is to Could while Will is to Can. It's not a question of Can vs Cannot.
Go back to reading Russian aircraft data sheets and similar trash.
Hahah! Cute. Did you come up with that all on your own? Probably not. We could ask the same of you. Apparently "You were absent too", seeing as tulips are NOT Blue.
Your hatred of America has apparently impaired your ability to properly learn, quote and steal even such a basic wisecrack. At that pace, your english will never rise above a child's level.
Hahaha, finchie you crack me up! This is better than seats at the comedy club! I thought I was "a waste of your time"?
First it's "sarcasm" for your lame attempt at promoting Russian tech. Now your mistake was an "edited" piece?
Violets are predominantly blue, hence their name and use in that old poem. Tulips are predominantly pink, so who in their right mind would use them as an example?
Oh yeah, the Russian pilot whose cock you're too busy sucking. Same one teaching you English?
No, finchie, if English was actually your first language (which it clearly isn't), you would know that RingSight is correct. The contraction "We'd" is exactly as he said it was. It is short for "We would". So, RingSight saying "We'd have", is the same as saying "We would have". There! I hope that clears it up for you.
yes, and that is not the point. "we would have" and "we can" has different meaning.
i didn't say it was my first language but you don't have to be an english to know how to speak english.
don't you know that even in america there are some 10milion mericans that can't read? thats the proof that even you're first languge is english it doesn't mean they know how to write it.
can you find america in the world map? alot of americans can't.
He didn't break it. Very very very close, but their was no sonic boom following the cloud. Several times the air cloud formed but it wasn't getting fully out of it.
for the people who said the fa 18 can't break the sound barrier type in F-18 BREAKING SOUND BARRIER click the 4th one, the one that has a guy in the little box.
Who cares. It was loud, it sounded cool, it looked cool, fast looking and it still had all of that fluttery white cloud behind it. Didn't it? Good enough for me to be called breaking the sound barrier. Anyone else?
i've seen the argument earlier in these postings in which one person said the f-18 is going 760mph and someone said thats wrong because the sound barrier is broken at 750mph. that person is incorrect...to break the sound barrier at sea level, (which the f-18 is slightly above in the video) you would have to be going 761.207051 mph. thats the sound barrier.
are you stupid? you know they have jets that can go mach 2(2 times the speed of sound) and higher. and also space shuttles smash the speed of sound before they leave the atmosphere
It's called transonic flight and usually occurs in the neighborhood of Mach 1 (0.8 to 1.2 to be exact) depending on the air density. This is a result of some of the airflow over the craft being supersonic, while some is not. These differences can further be explained using Bernoulli's principle.
He didn't break the sound barrier, but still a sweet high-sub sonic run. Vexle hit it spot on. The moisture is condensed into fog at the boundaries of different air densities. It's called "angel dust."
@bakulbharadwaj, you're wrong! That's supersonic. Sound barrier travels faster than transoniic and that F-18 fighter jet wasn't flying at Panasonic speed. It's a supersonic jet.
Icaller1915 3 months ago
did yall hear chris griffin yeeeaaaahhhhh
goaliemayne33 6 months ago
legal
giovannny7031 8 months ago
I Know Its Awsome , But I Want To See The Pilot His Face :D
TheFreeComedy 1 year ago
JONES BEACH AND NO IT WASNT SUPERSONIC UGHHH OK PEOPLE BEFORE YOU POST VIDEOS DO YOUR HOMEWORK ITS SUBSONIC THEY EVEN SAY IT AT AIR SHOWS THE HIGH SPEED PASS IS JUST BELOW SUPERSONIC THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER SO ITS .99!!
bronxkidd23 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
make that sound with my ass every morning
rengifo0987 1 year ago
yaaay
talesrof 1 year ago
What the sound barrier being broken REALLY SOUNDS LIKE
Rookies
watch?v=jqdbCGzmCfg
MetaliCanuck 1 year ago
that is not a sonic boom you ignorant.
SuperHornetTV 2 years ago
I don't think those spectators would handle that boom too good.
MetallicAsian 2 years ago 2
he didnt break the sound barrier, just messing with it
Stuntpiloot05 2 years ago 2
he was flirting with the sound barrier what a legend!
abacazam 2 years ago 3
I think I just jizzed
VMFA115Starloric 2 years ago
great sound and great plane!
EagleFulcrum1 2 years ago
Ronaldo !!
cezarmaia 2 years ago
Comment removed
captken 2 years ago
whoop de doo they want you to think he broke the sound barrier it was subsonic, he was pretty close though its always fun to see a high speed pass
hawkplaya94 2 years ago
the guy in the damn video even say he didnt break it lol
humansymphony 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
iaustin7 2 years ago
FAG
vinesboyseventysix 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how retard u must be..not to hear the break of sound barrier?....pff...that f-18 really broke the sound barrier...
rockaw3ar 2 years ago
BTW....That was not a sonic boom, and not faster than the S.O.S.
phineasgauge69 2 years ago 2
I wish i could fly in that f-18
emiel1234567890 2 years ago 3
if you put your mind to it, that can be you one day. Im determined to become a pilot. Im 17 and am taking flying lessons soon.
kingneptune117 2 years ago
they shoudbe had goku do that
godzilla19892012 2 years ago
goku can do that and better
HiZpaniK90 2 years ago
i agree with mmbz, at last sum1 who knows what theyre talking about
TranceImmortal 3 years ago
That was transonic, but definitely did not break the sound barrier
bakulbharadwaj 3 years ago 14
just to clear something up, a vapor cloud has nothing to do with breaking the sound barrier, it happens when theres a sudden drop in air pressure around the jet, this guy was flirting with mach 1
mmbbz 3 years ago 11
wait you can only pull 10g's right? just a question..
Rayscee 3 years ago
Depends on the duration. The average human can usually survive G loads in excess of 20 Gs, but that is just instantaneous Gs. Its about the limit at which your internal organs begin to tear away from their internal attachment points. Sustained Gs, however, the average Joe can usually only maintain consciousness up to just under 4 Gs. Beyond that, without proper physical conditioning and muscular techniques, blood no longer feeds oxygen to your brain and you lose consciousness.
A2ZNP1971K 3 years ago
Thanks :D
Rayscee 3 years ago
the record is only 11.5 Gs
killatopia 3 years ago
actually no...the record is offically happened in June 1951 where John Paul Stapp survived a 46 g deceleration. Look it up on some historical military sites.
SoccerBoy77 3 years ago
That pass was prolly .97 or .98 mach. He didnt break it but it was about as close as you get. I just saw one do a pass similar to that at the Kansas City Air Expo.
fish4kbcf 3 years ago
Nope, not even that high. Military jets doing demonstrations in the US rarely exceed 450 knots. ;)
A2ZNP1971K 3 years ago
Really? Now that I compare enough vids I see your point...the only thing I question is that the pilot of the Super Hornet at the KC Air Expo told me himself that it was the closest pass he had ever done nearing the speed of sound. He told me that they were flying at about .99 or .98 mach. That was where I was led to believe that he was doing the same. Thanks for the response though.
fish4kbcf 3 years ago
yea, didnt break sound barrier, they arent legally able to do it inless over oceans, or above i belive 30,000 feet, because once it does, it can cause windows to explode
bigbob6556 3 years ago 3
Yep....ive heard a sonic boom twice...once in nevada over the desert and once in colorado. The pilot at the kc air expo told me that he came about as close as you can get to booming the airport. Anyway I know that guy who left the comment saying that he wasnt going over 450 kts dosent know much about what he is talking about.
fish4kbcf 3 years ago
one word amazing i wish i could try that expereince
7aMoODaiZER 3 years ago
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE:
98 POINT 98 Mach. That is very seeable. As in just below mach 1
74377623 3 years ago
As a naval aviation specialist, I know that this F/A-18 Hornet DID NOT break the sound barrier! If it would have, a distinct sonic "boom" would have been audible as it flew by. It came close though, travelling at "transonic" speeds probably about mach 0.8. The vapor cloud that you see is technically known as "Prandtl-Glauert singularity", the point at which a sudden drop in air pressure occurs causing a visible condensation cloud also known as a "vapor cone", "shock-collar" or "shock egg".
macichitte 3 years ago 5
Since when does cloud stick to stuff? As a hairdresser I would say this phenomenon is obviously plasma as the plane is going like 1000+
panictactics 3 years ago
Knighthis, Where did you see an F-18F up here two weeks ago??? I was just at the Mcchord Airshow and the F-18 got the cloud to form and it was awsome!!! Missed the picture by a split second. Was it at olympia? Cuz that was a F-18C and I didnt see a cloud form. So just when and where did you see an F-18F up here get cleared to do a high speed pass?
captainjackn 3 years ago
.98 POINT 98 Mach. That is very seeable. As in just below mach 1
DK1102 3 years ago
98 mach?...kidding right??if its speed is 98 mach it wouldnt even shown at the camera..:D
LoupuGr 3 years ago
Guys Guys Guys!
They are not allowed to break the sound barrier at shows like this. It would break windows and ear drums.
The jets is going about .98 mach. The pressure wave is building up as the air is compressed by the speed and can't get out of the way fast enough. This high pressure are causes the condensation so you can see it.
I just saw this yesterday in Tacoma Washington when an F/A-18F did a high speed pass just like this.
Trust me, I know this stuff!
Steve
Knighthis 3 years ago 4
Yup. No sonic booms over the continental United States unless in restricted military zones.
And morons who say "you wouldn't be able to catch it on camera," just try faster then. And a cloud doesn't necessarily form during a sonic boom. It can form whenever the airciraft and surrounding air heat up to a certain point to form a vapor cloud.
Hawk02VUSAFS 3 years ago
It doesn't always blow ear drums, I was at RAAF Tindal when an F-111 went supersonic down the runway for a camera crew, just sounded like a giant blanket being ripped then a big bang, no louder though then firing a shotgun from your shoulder.
gnarkillkicksass 3 years ago
Then it wasn't supersonic. ;)
A2ZNP1971K 3 years ago
it go boom
shopjumpswimgirl 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow. You guys just don't understand. This took place at Oceana NAS in VA Beach. The weather moisture out there is PERFECT for condensation. This F-18 was not breaking the sound barrier at all. Due to high speed the aircraft generated moisture on the fuselage.
cmhumphr 3 years ago
No sir, that is the sound barrier being broken. Notice how you can't hear the plane until it's already gone by a bit? Yeah... Out running it's own sound.
Occrameq 3 years ago
that is a bullet
Hassey1989 3 years ago
white stuff is air condensation. Where was the teltale "BOOM"?
sw3912 3 years ago
The guy said he never broke it, he was flirtin with it. Yeah right. The telltale sign you broke the sound barrier is the noise and smokey white disfigurement coming off the back of the plane.
Luke5119 3 years ago
Ok no sonic boomm, anyway excellent shot, very suggestive.
tobanis 3 years ago
It takes a lot of thrust to break the sound barrier. I dont think this was breaking the barrier.Can someone evaluate.
RajaFarhan82 3 years ago
ya there was no sonic boom
not fast enough, but close
loggsoggs 3 years ago
No sonic boom, so it's pretty obviously not. Even the guy in the background on the video realizes that. The condensation cloud happens when humid air is rapidly decompressed behind the high pressure nose-wake of the plane. It doesn't require transonic flight. Supersonic condensation clouds usually appear *entirely* behind the plane. Search for "F-18 goes supersonic" to see one.
justanothergreysky 3 years ago
unbelaivible :P
TrancEThommY 3 years ago
If you watch "Breaking the sound barrier" posted by "angryhoboz" you can clearly hear the double boom.
sundog47 3 years ago
I suggest you research the sound barrier, and get a better source for aircraft ID. This FA-18C built by Boeing, did not break the sound barrier. It did reach transonic speed, at which the Prandtl- Glauert Singularity occurs, under the correct atmospheric conditions. No boom boom, no sound barrier end.
sundog47 3 years ago
+1 my friend. You are correct. It amazes my how stupid some people are.... lol!
FlyingTog 3 years ago
I think its strange that some define a visual event, with an audio interpretation. What the hell this is youtube, and I enjoy some of the theories. Its like, physics taught by Cheech & Chong.
peace
Sundog
sundog47 3 years ago
The camera mic cannot capture the real sound. Its just too damn loud.
DEFORCER 3 years ago
i love it this is wo i call coolll
HUGOMERCHAN 3 years ago
He passes the barrier exactly as he passes the tower and this is prob' why the sound cuts out there. Super cool.
4Dmetricology 3 years ago
no boem?
Daanie1994 3 years ago
there is no boom because the jet never truly broke the barrier, just matched it it seems
jimcahn87 3 years ago
i want to touch the pilot ;]
ApieceOfstick 3 years ago
imgine, breaking the light barrier! that would be weird to look at...
zxxtra 3 years ago
actually you wouldn't even see it because its going faster than the speed of light.
jed52 3 years ago
hes breaking the sound barrier moron, not the light barrier.
500style 3 years ago
I'm responding to the guy above me MORON so check your sources before you confront people.
jed52 3 years ago
you still can hear the jet after it hit the sound barrier no?
Peace7Maker 3 years ago
pretty soon they are going to have trains breaking the sound barrier! lol if its possible
trains107 3 years ago
They are used for high seep testing and pieces tend to disintegrate from shockwaes.
4Dmetricology 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
goodness i cant belive ive come across a chatroom of nerds who say and or claim they know everything *rings a bell* yu dont
by the way no one cares about sounds barriers and no1 wants too know what any of you have too say if you enjoy fighting on youtube *laughs a little* then clearly you have no friends and your mmother left you when you were a child for a man prostitue
darn shame!
from lauren P.J
XOXOXO
lovemehatemeLOLZ 3 years ago
LoL so why are you here posting stupid things?
b1l9a8s9 3 years ago
LoL so why are you here posting stupid things?
b1l9a8s9 3 years ago
You stupid ignorant bitch!!! You dont know what the fuck you're talking about!!!!
jed52 3 years ago
thats just about as close as you can get without breaking the barrier
ucantwin2000 3 years ago
thats deff not ah sonic boom..thats just ah cone formed from the moisture in the air u cant break the sound barrier over land! unless other wise told to
prince0fnike7 3 years ago
i don't get you idiots on youtube it's more of an intelect war with you M.I.T wannabees do you guys just look at videos and anylize the physics all day and argue like a bunch of yancie school girls all day.....GET A FUCKING GIRL! MATE you will have all the arguing your little over achieving heart desires trust me
propdriven1 3 years ago
Wow! You join YouTube 17 days ago and suddenly you know everything there is to know about people on YouTube?! We are discussing videos, numbnuts! If you lack the mental capacity to keep up, then...don't go away mad...just go away. Clear enough for you?
A2ZNP1971K 3 years ago
Did you just quote a 90 hair band song in your come back to my momment jesus man I can fucking google a better comment than that you prick
propdriven1 3 years ago
Ummm...no. It was a common saying long before any hair band used it in a song. It took you 5 months to come up with that response. Honestly, there is nothing funnier to watch than someone making a post just to tell others to stop posting because what we are saying somehow got his panties in a wad.
A2ZNP1971K 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love stupid people. You can't see sound. Nor is there a sound barrier. The sound barrier people refer to is a myth conjured up prior to the time when man was capable of faster than sound flight. It was believed time would cease to exist and or some wierd occurence would occur when you exceeded the speed of sound. What you see sorrounding the F-18 is called a compression wave that occurs on subsonic (slower airspeed than supersonic for the slow people) aircraft when high humidity is present.
ASSASSYN360 3 years ago
hahahahah ur definately one of the stupid people u speak of everything u said is false except for the aircraft ur referring to F-18 i dont know were u got ur information from but whoever gave it to u should kill themselves and there family friends and pets u should never post a comment on youtube again there should be penalties u get for stupid comments like your sentenced to 1 month of no comments u should just get the electric chair... MORON!
DANIAC262 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If I am so stupid then why haven't you whom claims to be smarter are incapable of coming up with a statement that contradicts my comment. Oh, thats right you don't know the truth you don't have a clue what to say because you have no degree in Aviation from henderson state university. My B.S. in Aviation proffesional pilot track is where I got my info. You have no credintials to counter that little kid. Go get educated before you involve yourself in adult conversations.
ASSASSYN360 3 years ago
u said there was no sound barrier.. what kind of aviation degree do u have?? the statements u made were dumb and i believe ur lying about ur so called aviation degree. i like how everybody is giving u a thumbs down on ur last comment lol and i think 21 is pretty far from a little kid so go fuck urself assassyn douche
DANIAC262 3 years ago
well, the sound barrier isn't exactly a MYTH, but it's kind of more like an imaginary thing used to describe moving faster than sound easier. This guy was flying at transonic speed, which is at the speed of sound. when you say "time would cease to exist" that was when they were talking about the speed of LIGHT.
qwertyplay123 3 years ago
Ignorant people eh? I know what your talking about.
nativebrother 3 years ago
These American fighter planes definitely have something erotic about them, haven`t they ?
SaskiaSharbaji 4 years ago
40. The answer you're looking for is 40.
smoothdrummer29 3 years ago
nothing compared 2 a UFO
Kawehsaki 4 years ago
ok enjoy "MAC and ME"
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
he was actually right on the verge of breaking it
philly043 4 years ago
thats insain, Shit.
dpyro2007 4 years ago 2
if u break the sound barrier then everyhting under or around the plane would be blown away. Discovery channel people
LayWing 4 years ago 2
Exactly right. The shock wave at that distance would cause pretty substantial injuries to the spectators.
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
then it would be cheaper to use than JDAM's.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
Oh ok. I must have read the TITLE wrong above the video. DUDE! Grow up.
jetcrafter 4 years ago
Hey everyone. I am the one who filmed this F-18 in Sept. 2004 at the Oceana NAS airshow.
I just stumbled across this and laughed at the ignorance of this poster of my vid. Get this as I'll only write it once.....
HE DID NOT BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER! It was only a high speed pass at the airshow. Even the person who I caught on audio standing next to me said, "he never broke it, but he was flirtin' with it." What more needed to be said?
Ed Langworthy
jetcrafter 4 years ago
how are you gonna call me ignorant. I never said that the plane broke the sound barrier dude so get lost and go home.
andreluxury 4 years ago
Nope, it isn't. ;) I don't want to start a fight or anything with you though. Its still a cool video. Thanks for posting it. :D
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
im just gonna tell you to check wikipedia. capabilities to reach mach 1.8
andreluxury 4 years ago
I know what its capabilities are, dude. I'm just saying that the F-18 in this particular video is not flying at supersonic speed. I've heard lots of sonic booms in my career, and that's not one of them. ;)
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
well i forone never said it was a sonic boom. lol. ;)
andreluxury 4 years ago
No, but you do say in the description something about it breaking the sound barrier. ;) Maybe you should say something like "Look at the wake turbulence cloud being formed around this F-18 as it passes at subsonic speed." Heh...I guess it doesn't have the same ring to it...kinda boring. Its cool though, man, its just a video. :D
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
i just copied down the title of the original video where i got it from. i guess i should have changed the name a while back.
andreluxury 4 years ago
Nah, its really not a problem, Andre. Just wanted to keep you from being totally misled. There are lots of these kinds of vids on the internet. There is one real one though, I'll see if I can dig up the link so you can see and hear what it really looks like.
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
v=L7At5Jfc3LM
There's the video link, just paste it into your address bar after the question mark.
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
why would it go supersonic near land thouhg? that can deaf poeple.
andreluxury 4 years ago
That was not over land in the video I linked, it was over the ocean. Aircraft travel at supersonic speeds all the time over land though, just in restricted areas. The Space Shuttle reentry was my "alarm clock" on several occasions at Edwards AFB.
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
ohok, because it looked near to the shore.
andreluxury 4 years ago
That was a US Navy ship that the video was taken from. ;)
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
That was an airshow over land you obviously didn't hear the commentator talking. Turn up your volume.
ASSASSYN360 3 years ago
This Hornet is not Supersonic. That is NOT a sonic boom.
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
It's illegal to The airforce in holland to break a sound barrier. Last night we had one. I'd never heard it before. Half the city called the emergency number they thought it was an explosion.
Dirkie25 4 years ago
The guy behind the controls inside the jet has BALLS.
mauricera 4 years ago
Can a F-4 do that easily??
carguy12345678910 4 years ago
very easily just needs a long run
marvin6262000 4 years ago
flying fast because R-73 and R-77 is gonna get him..
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
Oh boy, loookeee here, another Sukhoi worshiper. Too bad they didn't get to launch their R-73s or 77s 'cause we'd have taken out their crappy carriers and decrepit airfields.
RingSight91 4 years ago
you've taken out a Russian plane and in Russian airspace/carrier? are you still dreaming?
all america can bomb and shoot down are the military of an ill financed and trained military.
did the american's stood up against a formidable opponent?
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
Okay dumbnuts, find one "formidable opponent" who has launched R-73s/77s at us "and have lived to tell about it" then post a video about it. That's right, there's none, even the trash flown by the Russians.
No, I'm not "dreaming". Learn more English before running your mouth. I said "We'd have" for "We would have", in prepositional tense. Hasn't happened yet, but we could have if we needed to.
RingSight91 4 years ago
hey idiot its a sarcasm dipshit, i gues your brain can't think that much, isn't it huh?
yeah those opponents never got the chance to fire because they lack training. and thats what i'm saying you can shoot only those ill trained pilots.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
"Sarcasm" my ass. You really believe Russian-made systems and even training are worth anything, which is pathetic, but go ahead and fool yourself.
And no, dumbass, saying "we'd + have" turns "we had" from 'past tense' into 'future prepositional'; not a "prediction" but a "statement of possibility".
I wasn't born in the USA and even I learned that much.
As for my "brain can't think" question, it's not "isn't it huh" but "can it, huh".
Go back to your tutor; your English still sucks.
RingSight91 4 years ago
you'e very confused idiot. you are the one who used "we'd" and meant "we would have"
if my english sucks? how can i call your english? is that monkey english?
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
LOL! Once again you ignored the "have". Okay let me word it out, okay, "we had have" is how it comes out.
It's called "American English" confined by YouTube limits, which is better than your broken attempt. Say it fast enough & it comes out as "we'd have"; a perfectly acceptable use for conversation.
But, I doubt Русский fans like you can work at that level, no?
RingSight91 4 years ago
had and have are different. you don't get that, do you?
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
LOL! Apparently you don't understand colloquialisms. Still stuck?
What do you think someone means when he says, "I'd help you if I could, but I can't."
"Had" is not the only use for an "apostrophe d". I guess they didn't discuss that beyond your grade school.
RingSight91 4 years ago
boneheads just don't understand that had and would are different.
you used "i and would/ i'd" instead of "i will/i'll"
good luck with your english, you're a waste of time.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
LOL good luck too, finding a new tutor! Your old teachers indeed wasted your time.
Of course had and would are different. One is regular past tense and the other is irregular future prepositional. Meanwhile you're still stuck on regular tenses.
Nobody says, "I'll help you if I could", Would is to Could while Will is to Can. It's not a question of Can vs Cannot.
Go back to reading Russian aircraft data sheets and similar trash.
RingSight91 4 years ago
A small poem especially for you:
Roses are red,
Tulips are blue.
When God was giving brains,
Where the hell were you...
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
Hahah! Cute. Did you come up with that all on your own? Probably not. We could ask the same of you. Apparently "You were absent too", seeing as tulips are NOT Blue.
Your hatred of America has apparently impaired your ability to properly learn, quote and steal even such a basic wisecrack. At that pace, your english will never rise above a child's level.
And: It's "Violets are blue", dipshit!
RingSight91 4 years ago
you're really an idiot, it was edited dumbass.
and it really shows you're a birdbrain, there's a blue tulip asslicking twit!
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
Hahaha, finchie you crack me up! This is better than seats at the comedy club! I thought I was "a waste of your time"?
First it's "sarcasm" for your lame attempt at promoting Russian tech. Now your mistake was an "edited" piece?
Violets are predominantly blue, hence their name and use in that old poem. Tulips are predominantly pink, so who in their right mind would use them as an example?
Oh yeah, the Russian pilot whose cock you're too busy sucking. Same one teaching you English?
RingSight91 4 years ago
BTW "we'd" is short for "we had"
"we would have" is different dumbass.
"we had" is past tense while "we would have" if future tense.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
Im sure there is a grammer and spelling website out there for You QUEERS. Get a fukin life
SRUSSELL4 4 years ago
grammer? my ass..
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
No, finchie, if English was actually your first language (which it clearly isn't), you would know that RingSight is correct. The contraction "We'd" is exactly as he said it was. It is short for "We would". So, RingSight saying "We'd have", is the same as saying "We would have". There! I hope that clears it up for you.
A2ZNP1971K 4 years ago
yes, and that is not the point. "we would have" and "we can" has different meaning.
i didn't say it was my first language but you don't have to be an english to know how to speak english.
don't you know that even in america there are some 10milion mericans that can't read? thats the proof that even you're first languge is english it doesn't mean they know how to write it.
can you find america in the world map? alot of americans can't.
finchiestiffler79 4 years ago
C-L-O-S-E.
CLK15 4 years ago
He didn't break it. Very very very close, but their was no sonic boom following the cloud. Several times the air cloud formed but it wasn't getting fully out of it.
OKieMusician 4 years ago
for the people who said the fa 18 can't break the sound barrier type in F-18 BREAKING SOUND BARRIER click the 4th one, the one that has a guy in the little box.
rodriguezalexjeter 4 years ago
not at low lvl when it have ordenance or much fuel
favioalex 4 years ago
Who cares. It was loud, it sounded cool, it looked cool, fast looking and it still had all of that fluttery white cloud behind it. Didn't it? Good enough for me to be called breaking the sound barrier. Anyone else?
scoobylicious 4 years ago
what does it meant to break sound berrier
GtotheJproductions 4 years ago
the jet is going so fast the it is moving fast then the speed of sound
ShowerCurtain31 4 years ago
and to be even more exact the speed of sound in other speed measurements is:
1,116.4 feet per second
340.3 meters per second
761.2 mph
1,225.1 kilometers per hour
661.5 knots
rms42 4 years ago 2
thnxs dude... i neede that info
jinto07 4 years ago
i've seen the argument earlier in these postings in which one person said the f-18 is going 760mph and someone said thats wrong because the sound barrier is broken at 750mph. that person is incorrect...to break the sound barrier at sea level, (which the f-18 is slightly above in the video) you would have to be going 761.207051 mph. thats the sound barrier.
rms42 4 years ago
He didnt fully break it just caught up to it.
lockme5 4 years ago
THIS JET DIDNT BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER!
Where was the Sonic Boom?
As the guy said, "He didnt break it, he was only flirting with it"
TearsAreConfessions 4 years ago 2
peut-il rivalisé avec un OVNI ???
ramexponention 4 years ago
est bonne....
mrheaum 4 years ago
Somebody please help! Im confused about how this works!
zant112 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its impossible to break the sound barrier
fatih13489 4 years ago
are you stupid? you know they have jets that can go mach 2(2 times the speed of sound) and higher. and also space shuttles smash the speed of sound before they leave the atmosphere
gosnold1 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can do it with a whip too.
wslx0195 4 years ago 5
i know! fitih13489 what the hell is wrong with you. are you retarded or something?
firemetal1 4 years ago
The words of a fool...
DeathBringer9216 4 years ago
ofcourse u can break a sound barrier, are u a freshmen or what?
RaulValdovinos 4 years ago
no its not dumbass. read a book for christ's sake.
jed52 4 years ago
THANK YOU gosnold1..u know how this works...apperantly some one doesnt
xSPOOKxGBK 4 years ago
Uhm, are you slow? I mean explain the video. Explain the whole jets MADE to go mach 2. DUMBASS.
loveaffair911 4 years ago
wow your smart
kortthedrummer 4 years ago
you suck
firemetal1 4 years ago
tu suçe
mrheaum 4 years ago
yes :) subsonic...
leondreaq 4 years ago
Excellent fly by and vertical climb. Love that vapor trail!
654Boomer 4 years ago 2
nah, subsonic speed here
Twpk2 4 years ago
Where is the boom ?
No boom , No supersonic flight !
rhgrsh 4 years ago
It's called transonic flight and usually occurs in the neighborhood of Mach 1 (0.8 to 1.2 to be exact) depending on the air density. This is a result of some of the airflow over the craft being supersonic, while some is not. These differences can further be explained using Bernoulli's principle.
SaxManJon 4 years ago
That shit rattled my windows..
lookn4thepowpow 4 years ago
He didn't break the sound barrier, but still a sweet high-sub sonic run. Vexle hit it spot on. The moisture is condensed into fog at the boundaries of different air densities. It's called "angel dust."
crispycritterz 4 years ago