Added: 4 years ago
From: fedyanov
Views: 142,633
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (222)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol E55 is better but meanwhile it lost to the mighty M5. ///M-POWER ALL DAY!!

  • M5 st888

  • My uncle owns a Mercedes E-Type. Same generation, but no e55. I can tell that the e-Type is such a powerfull car! One time, my uncle accelerated. I was like: Holy shit! Such a G-R-E-A-t car!

  • ///M POWER 4LIFE!!!

  • lol, if the E55 does this, wht the E63 would done

  • e55amg is faster than e63...

  • @kubaaa15 LOL??

  • @msdb320  lol ?

    watch?v=sL09CSIVKag&feature=re­lated

    look at this and don't tell mi bullshiit man ..

  • @kubaaa15 how? the 63 engine is so much bigger than a 55.. how can it be slower?

  • @findmeifyoucan because e55amg had kompresor ...

  • @findmeifyoucan The E55 is supercharged ;)

  • AMG, baby!!! :)

  • ///M-Power 

  • M5 is bullshit MERCEDES IS MUCH BETTTTTTTTTTTTTer

  • thats not a fer start

  • BMW POWER

    M5 Rules bebes!!!

    and yes, the omg sorry amg lost the race ...

  • why do you automatically asume the mercedes sounds like that? just because its near the camera?

    A v10 sounds ridiculous,i've heard a few M5 reving it.

  • @quatroportte cant even hear m5 over e55, amg always sound better.

  • that amg sounds good

  • M > amg.

  • what for an sound! AMG for ever!!

  • AMG POWER

  • Another AMG win.

  • ///AMG 4EveR! (L)

  • the benz is awseome böööööööööööö respekt

  • Mercedes has yet to learn how to properly balance a car for it to do well either on the track or the drag. M > AMG always has been and still is.

  • @Lunatic0001

    no brain? ;) AMG > M > RS . the new e 63 amg is sportier than the m5 on autobild.d(e) he have the better time.

  • @waldemar31293 The e63 amg is not sportier than the m5, it's a lot softer which in turn does not handle as well, the only thing that saves it on the track is the straights since it has a lot of torque from the 6.2 V8. So after so many years mercedes finally came out with a car that is slightly faster than the M5 on the track but still couldn't beat the M5 in all aspects. The E60 M5 was made in 2004, I guess that wasn't enough time for merc to make a better car.

  • @waldemar31293 Merc and Audi are always playing catch up with BMW, they finally managed to catch up to the e60 M5 in some aspects, but unfortunately for them BMW is coming out with the new M5 which means that Merc and Audi will be sweating to try and catch up again. M > AMG, always has been always will be.

  • @Lunatic0001 lol yes. of course. can you say to me then why amg is worldwide best tuner and mostly tuned cars sells although he is more expensive? M was never better and will never also be it. the new 5er will also weigh again 100 kg more. he will be also barely sportier because he more on komfort was trimmed. Mercedes Benz> over cars

  • @waldemar31293 Under what claim can you say AMG is the worldwide best tuner? That's pretty ignorant. You can look at numbers all you want, we'll see how well the car does when it does come out, all I know is that 550bhp and 500ft/lbs means that it will be faster than the current E63 and it will send merc back to the drawing board for a few years. If you look back to history you'll find the same story, BMW makes a car a few years later Merc and Audi catch up. M has always been ahead of RS,AMG

  • @Lunatic0001 you know that amg makes a new motor? sls amg is a very important supersportscar what can do a z4 m or m6? nothing. bmw have NO sprtscar for a sls amg or a r8. rofl you say really bmw and history? look at the history what mercedes and amg made it's fantastic! you say really shit... how old are you?

  • @waldemar31293 So just because a car company does not make a car in a certain class that another company makes, makes it a bad car company? That logic is flawed. A Z4 M and an M6 are in different categories than an R8 or SLS, so there is no point in comparing cars that were never ment to compete against each other and are in completely different classes. And yes, as history states, when BMW got their foothold in the car company Merc and Audi have always been playing catch up.

  • @Lunatic0001 probably wrong. in what is bmw better than merc?

  • @waldemar31293 Two easiest choices would be the M3 and the M5, every single time a new ones comes out Audi and Merc spend a good 3-4 years trying to make something that beats it in a few of it's categories by which that time BMW comes out with the newer version which forces Merc and Audi to start designing the next model to try and catch up. The point is that BMW always sets the standard which other companies try to match, ex. e60 M5 came out 04', 2 years later E63 came out.

  • @Lunatic0001 you are a idiot.. you have no idea about cars. the w211 and w212 are really good cars the new 5er have quality problems. all bmw designs are the same from 1er-7er. the e 63 cames only because the e55 is a old engine. he was on the w210.. really shut up.

  • @waldemar31293 When Mercedes makes a car at the same time as BMW does, the M division shows it's superiority, an example of this would be the C63 AMG vs e92 M3.

  • @Lunatic0001 you know that the c63 have the better track time than the m3? ;).. really shut up :)

  • @waldemar31293 No it doesn't, in a show of top gear they put the M3 vs C63 vs RS4, and the BMW came out on top. The reason why Mercedes had to make the e63 is because the e60 M5 was completely blowing their competing car out of the water. Even at that it took them 2 years to make a car that's really only faster on straights due to all the extra torque.

  • @Lunatic0001 the c 63 is sportier than the m3 and rs4 look on autobild.d(e) wtf! rofl look the video again the e 55 is blowing up the m5.. the driver is badass(read description). and c 63 rs4 are sedans M3=coupe

  • @waldemar31293 An e55 is not faster than a e60 m5 on the track, M3 coupe or sedan, it is still faster than the C63 and RS4.

  • @Lunatic0001 m3 sedan? wtf bmw has only a m3 coupe lol. i mean like that video! and see for a bad start the e 55 fucks the m5.. c 63 amg have the better track time and 0-100 in 4,4 seconds!

  • @waldemar31293 Congratulations you can read numbers, this video is irrelevant as we do not and can not know anything done to each of the cars. Seeing that you don't even know that there is an M3 sedan shows how little you know about the cars you're arguing about. Search rs4 vs m3 vs c63 amg, the cars are driven by professionals, are all stock, and are driven on the same track at the same time under the same conditions. The M3 beat the C63 and RS4.

  • @Lunatic0001 you're wrong you dumb dickhead..the Benz came in first then BMW then Audi. they said the Benz was a beast..the other two were boring.

  • @zx9mic Clearly you have not seen the video thus your conclusion is irrelevant.

  • @zx9mic that's rigth!!! tell tin to that stupid human!!! second place is not first!!! ///AMG 4LIFE

  • @Batmaxgolf4 AMG Lost Tho ?

  • @lazzaaro35 what?

  • @Batmaxgolf4 The E55 AMG lost the race

  • @Lunatic0001 .. how many i tell you that you go on autobild.d(e) there are professionals who drive them all the c 63 is the sportiest safest of them and yet i go sleep.. i tell it you again C 63 AMG IS SPORTIER THAN THE M3 . good night

  • @waldemar31293 C63 is slower than the M3 and is a perfect example of what Merc does wrong, a lot of torque and power but absolutely no control over it. Which is why the Merc was slower than the M3.

  • BMW POWER

  • AMG > M

  • 13.1 for 620HP ?? even stock does around 12 sec

  • you can only hear mercedes :))))

  • @PEROlozhach cos its tuned

  • That E55 was badass!

  • the 2003 and newer E55 is a BAD BAD car,, low 12s rite off the showroom,, and now,, you can find 03s for around 25k,,, cant go wrong with that!!!

  • I agree 100percent

  • @IRONSEAN7 shhhhhh. dont give away the bigest secret in the sport luxury car world!!!!! i love my merc exuast and headers and you have a gallardo killer:)

  • E55 AMG accelerates faster than M5 (if both were stock) & E55 AMG is much better car...

  • @brox114 no

  • @xDutchEaglex

    Oh, yes.

  • that sounds soooo sweet

  • Typical V8 ^^

  • ya but i still like the ///M5 it has a V10

  • Wat rims are on the e55?

  • Comment removed

  • BMW is not the car

  • comments like MERCEDES BENZ FOREVER make me laugh seriously, it says enough bout u the "MERCEDES LOVERS" tbh. Go on click on a hand on right side now MERC LOVERS <3 <3 <3. lol

  • MERCEDES-BENZ FOREVER.

  • And what exactly do we see here?

    Or was it about hearing.

    Because the two little ants at the horizon weren't easy to spot. Let alone being able to see who won.

  • all u hear is the mercedes haha

  • how does a e60 m5 get a 13.1s in a 1/4 mile

  • MB FOREVER!!!

  • but it lost...

  • nice bitch in the red on the sidelines hahah

  • Loser undereducated loser.

  • Mercedes E-klass very nice car :)

  • fuck bmw benz all dayyy

  • BMW and Mercedes Benz. Hmmm... My old man has a mercedes. I have a bimmer. His was 300E mine was 525i with M50B25 engine. His needed to see the workshop every month to solve monthly problems. Mine just needed preventive maintenance. Mine handled better on curves and better in acceleration. Well those were ordinary road cars not the high powered ones. The benz is sold now and he bought a bimmer.

  • Bmw takez the cake...

  • Merc on top end, u wish dude..

    Lesson #1 a merc can NOT EVER beat a beemer, if u strip that kompressor and the charger, ur AMG'z would simply be NO-mg'z...

  • top end merc will do it

  • nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhhh

  • Seriously, let these retards talk shit about AMG, they can stick their mexican produced mustangs.

  • dalesteel your the most arrogant cocksucker english hoe i have seen . every car has pros and cons.

  • that e55 is beautiful... dont treat him like that ^^

  • does anyone know the model or name of the wheels on the merc. there really nice, thanks

  • bad payment more vids

  • I think that's an 03 E55 AMG. The new 08 E63 does 0 to 60 in 4.2, and the M5 does 0 to 60 in 4.4. But that 03 E55 probably gets the car to 60mph in 4.5 or 4.6. So this really is a pretty accurate contest. Just don't forget the Cadillac STS-V.

  • 4.2 for the 55 as well sts v is gay ass fuck no competition from these cars

  • "gay ass fuck", what a phrase. But you're right about the STS-V, it's a little slower and weaker than the Audi RS6, BMW M5, and Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG (and proposed 2010 Lexus GS-F). Yea, maybe about 4.2 for the E55. But that's weird, because the new 09 E63 does 4.2. Are you sure that 03 E55 doesn't do like 4.4 or 4.5?

  • "bad payment"

    LOL, doesn't look like it...

  • unlike mercedes, beamer doesnt need superchargers to make there top models (their m cars fast). their lower models like the 3 series and 5 use turbos but those arent the tp of the line cars

  • well the new(er) e63 is naturally aspirated and has more horsepower & torque than the m5; 507 hp & 465 ft lbs vs. 500 hp & 383 ft lbs

  • bmw has an optional 5.7liter engine that produces 611hp and 470torque which has been tested and the m5 does 0-60 in 4 seconds flat with that engine

  • yea the mecedes wot that race the m3 was faster the first 80 meters but then the mb come back :)

  • the E55 will pick up qicker cuz of that supercharger, but that V10 is N/A so it will catch up about half mile down. matter of fact an E63 would be a better match, for the M5

  • You forgot the Audi A8...

  • Well the new 08 M3 does 0 to 60 in 4.5, which isn't ridiculously fast but plenty fast for a sports car. The new 08 E63 also does 0 to 60 in 4.5. They're both luxury cars. The new 63 is like $85,000 and the M3 is like $65,000. The E63, is a tad bit more upscale/luxurious, much stronger, and far more reliable. But you have to admit that both cars are very good. I prefer the E63 AMG.

  • the e55 is ridicously fast on the highway its faster than a 63 for sure and the 55 hits 60 in 4.2 for a 5000lb car =)

  • If you guys want a TRUE drivers car, get a porsche or a ferrari... The rest are just sedans dressed with the tinsel of high performance.

    But both the E55 and the M5 are nice. Both German. Both fast.

  • my EVO would smoke all these cars

  • 0-60 yes, 0-100 your out of steam. Then in your rear view mirror you see the snout of an M-Badged 5 series. You'll be in its way.

  • Replying to SaxmanBW91's comment: Well Porsches range from a $45,000 Boxster (6.7 0 to 60 time, not very fast at all and not real luxurious either) to a $192,000 911 GT2 (3.7 0 to 60 time, very fast and very luxurious). Ferraris range from $210,000 to $320,000, all having 0 to 60 times of near 3.2. You forgot Lamborghini in that "TRUE drivers car" list of yours, which is obviously incomplete and not well thought-out. The E55 and M3 aren't ridiculously fast, but great for performance cars.

  • the e55 and the e63 will destroy the m3 or m5 in any type of race.

    mb has more horsepower and is better engineered.

    sorry bmw

    you guys suck.

  • LOL better engineering, is that why BMW won 6 out of 11 engine of the year awards and mercedes won none? The M3 DEMOLISHES the C63 around a track. And the M5 is faster than the E63/E55 in a straight line and on the track.

  • M5 is not faster in a straight line you fool. Around a track, yes, in a straight line, no.

  • the e55 only has 469hp and a 5spd auto tranny. the M5 has 507 and a 7spd SMG and is about 50lbs lighter as well. The numbers dont lie my friend, neither do the vids. Just search E55 vs M5, there is a vid where your in the M5 and u see it spank the E55

  • i'm sorry, but C63 won the striaght run. beamer gets the track everytime. better handling. bt the C63 raped the M3 sorry

  • your simply a cock.Mercedes are better? is that why bmw 5 series is car of the year, every year? you toss pot. Bmw are more sportier mercs are for girls so you must be a girl. Drive a bmw then drive a merc. BMW are the best cars on the road. like they say The Ultimate Driving Machine. You worse than them twats who think audi are the god. you nob

  • ay bitch you better watch ur mouth, i respect beamers and i do agree the e class was not as good as the 5 series, but that's abot it, i owned2 BMW's and believe me, they spent more time at the dealership than in my garage. i now own an 04E55 and a 1997 C36, i havn't sent em down to the shop once, yet. BMW's are ok cars, but they shouldn' be compared to mercedes.

  • That message wasnt aimed at you but it does seem like you talk shit aswel. Mercedes are dull, boring and slow. There is nothing about a mercedes that is better than a bmw. They are reliable solid cars thats it. Mercedes and bmw are miles ahead of audi and vw because they are all shitty front wheel drive. Atleast in mercedes credit they are using rear wheel drive like bmw. But bmw are superior thats a fact. All merc do is throw a huge engine in. Thats why they dont handle like a beema.

  • that i understand, but wat i'm saying is, beemer is not better than mercedes. mercedes just screw themselves by mergin with american cars, otherwise, these cars are bulletproof, just as much as beamer. they will come back, and tey are. u seen the black series? soo far beamer is losing in every aspect. once i changed te 02 sensors on my beamers, the sensors i took out were japanese? at least when u pulled em otta my benz they were bosch.

  • yeah but they are all built in japan, every electrical part is nowadays. But seriously bmw are the better car. i love the look of a few mercs(new c-class - lovely!) and maybe 15 years ago merc was the dogs bollocks and would blow bmw away. but times have changed and bmw have everything going for them. I accept that the 5 series is not that nice looking but the sports is. and i'll tell you now BMW will out drive/handle any merc any day.

  • go watch the review on the clk63 vs. the m6 and then see whats what.

  • so you do you think that bosch dont have a factory in japan?

  • hmm possibly why u ask my friend?

  • because u sed u pulled a sensor out of you merc and sed is was bosch and not japense shit. But it will of been made in japan any how cus everything is nowadays.

  • Audi has quattro, your an idiot

  • audi as quatro in there top end models. Standard they are Front wheel drive. Thats because audi are shit and have not realised RWD is better.

  • they haven't your right, but still I'm just saying there not all front wheel drive

  • i never said they were all fwd. I know audi do the quatro, they were the first saloon car with the system. But RWD is better than 4 WD. 4WD takes too much power away. Hence racing cars are RWD.

  • Last time I checked Lambos were racing cars aswell.A Nissan GT-R will outpace most everything out there with 4wd.

  • no it wont. You look at ALL the race winning sports cars... they are RWD. 4WD has 2 diffs to drive, all draining power, plus 2 diffs heavier than 1. Thats why BMW always out pace audi RS's around a track. Simple as that really.

  • You've got GT-Rs beating 911 Turbos and supposedly 911 GT2s around the nurburgring and the Porsches all have equal or better power except that the GT-R has better grip because of the 4wd and that's on a track. They built the Veyron with 4wd to handle all that power. BMWs beat Audis simply because they are better cars with a better pedigree and more power, the M3 has more power than an RS4 but I've never seen a current gen(underpowered) M5 vs and RS6 I would take Audi and I am a BMW lifer.

  • audi rs 6 will beat M5 in straight line. Around a track the M5 wins. I have an e60 bmw which is the baby 2.2 L but its the sports version and sticks like shit to a blanket. I do not believe you can get a better handling family car than an M5/5 Series Period. As for Nissan GT-R, they outpace alot of cars due to there electronic system which works with the 4WD system hand in hand. The reason they are so quick is that they have super modified turbo engines. They dont have very long lifes.

  • I'm not sure about the current gen rs6 vs m5 around a track, I'd like to see that. And as for the GT-R we'll have to see what it does as it ages, so far the only reason I've heard of it not lasting long is because porsche bought one and red lined it around the nurburgring for months. The thing with the GT-R and a lot of the new 4wd cars is they dont split power up evenly so you're not losing any through the drive train, it's simply used for handling where necessary, it's becoming more common.

  • but you got to look at the facts there driving more diffs, just like Air Con looses you power so does 4 WD. The problem with the GTR is that it as been geared to accelerate. Thats it! For example, put it against an M5 in a straight line, it will top out at 170mph ish, M5 will hit 205mph. Plus dont forget build quality. yeah there nice when there new but they dont age like the german cars. When i look at cars I dont just look at 0-60 because they dont give a true 'road' indication.

  • That is true enough, I have a 540 and am getting an M5 in a few months and the only time I drive at the limit around turn is at 3 am, the only thing you can really do safely enough on streets is drag race. Now I'd never trade my car for a normal japanese car but I would consider a skyline or a supra because they had fantastic build quality and that is the reason you can get so much power out of them and I'm pretty sure this GT-R is no different,I don't drive my cars much in the winter,they last.

  • true true. My heart was going to buy the M5 in Jan/Feb when I had enough pennys saved. But I saw the 520i in the right colour with bi-xenons and really high spec with sports pack, and my head bought that. I saved £20,000 on m5 plus economy and to be truthfull you get looks in it as much as you would an M5 because they more or less look the same in Carbon Black. But I would still love the E60 M5, They are trully a great car and would have M5 over an aston martin if i had the money to loose.

  • OMFG you are sooo full of shit !!! 2 comments above you stated: "M5 vs and RS6 I would take Audi and I am a BMW lifer. " And now you are getting an M5? :O Why aren't you getting an RS6? Perhaps because you are a 22 years old punk who just like to talk shit on youtube and pretend he knows stuff about cars?? I would say that's plausible.

  • Take it as in "in a race" no as in buy one fool. I never talked shit and I grew up in a garage, I've been working on cars since I was 8 so relax there buddy, grab some sarmale and chill.

  • You are turning it around now but that's ok. I can't stop laughing though, I liked the phrase with sarmale, good one :)

  • haha I'm glad but that's what I meant. I would never get an audi, there is no car I love to hate more than an audi.

  • Ok, my bad then. I'm just curious, do you really know sarmale or did you search it up on the web?

  • No most of my friends are romanian, and they all have audis or vws and a few of my exs were romanian as well. I know all about sarmale and mamaliga, I even have some of my friends mom's zacusca here. heidi pa.

  • GTR does not beat a 911 GT2 around a track. It doesnt even come close to it. Nissans claims about its 'Ring performance have not been matched by anyone since so i have a feeling they lied about it. Going across country roads or when you are on a slippery surface i would much rather have 4wd however.

  • Please explain how the M3 has more power than the RS4

  • MERCEDES BENZ BEST

  • bmw and Mercedes are both greAT german engineered cars, but in my choice i would rather have the bmw M5. plus if u listen to the m5 it sounds just like a dodge viper

  • e 55s are only faster in straight lines the handling on bmws kills mercedes every time

  • I bet you haven't driven either you magazine reading reading fanboy...and just so you know your precious Car and Driver picked an MB over the M5 last time I checked

  • i dont read magazines u cocksucker. everyone knows that bmws handle better than mercedes

  • soo true amarzola. I don't understand how a TRUE car enthusiast could like mercedes. BMW is just suchh a better car.

  • i think a true enthusiast would admit that BMW's are more driver focused but I don't think it's a crime to like merc as well

  • Ill agree with that sorth, i myself would never own a merc tho

  • yeah i don't think i even could either, too many cheaper and better alternatives

  • fully agree with c32amgftw hehe :)

  • a 625hp e55, will be doing 10's, not 12's. Why do M3/M5 drivers/ fanny boys just can't face the fact that their cars are slower than MB rivals. Fucking pussies

  • yeah but your mb's wont be doing ridiculous times around nuremburg

  • Oh yeah I live in Texas so I really care about what my car will be doing on a track in Germany. Hell.. even if there was a track next to my house 99.9% of the time I would be driving my car on the road not on a track.

  • bmw will last longer have one with 200,000(540) miles and one with 50,000(M5) The m5 will take those on ramps better and it looks akatrillion times better

  • Both great cars, I'd take either one. Love the styling of both cars equally. Same for the interior... but I love BMW so I'd take that one most likely.

  • LOL! Some of the comments are so hilarious that I can't read anymore 'cause I'm tired of pissing in my pants and staining my shorts.

  • that shits not even a 55 put it against a real amg and c what hapens

  • lets try e63 lol anyway nice race

  • cool!!!!!!

  • There are so many idiots! Just enjoy the car's, there both amazing in there own way.

  • BMWs are very popular - ie admired - amongst low to middle income groups. and since there is a strong positive correlation between intelligence and income its not too difficult to extrapolate that BMWs are for idiots :P

  • so true! you got a +1 from me

  • only 3 minuses?! come on bimmer fans you can do better than that...

  • have they wrecked your character? your dick's size or your asshole's size(if u are gay that is more likely since there is a positive correlation of intelligence and homosexuality) has enlarged with money? i am stupid and poor, i drive a mitsubishi galant 140hp. mercedes are for old people and cab drivers. reliable though. bmw's are sporty but everywhere. if i were as perfect as you, i would go for a pink bentley like PARIS HILTON. she is INTELLIGENT like you ARE.

  • dude i was taking a piss at morons who feel the need to defend the products of car companies. "aaahhhh BMW forever homedawg!!!!" its just a fucking car you dolt - why would i defend a detergent company's products? and stick with astrology since its the only thing you know anything about

  • Eddiesz, you are right!!! :)

  • mercedes won

  • the beamer won

  • mercedes rulzzzzz

  • the V10 bmw with SMG2 gearbox!!!!! the best!!!

  • Mercedes Rules. M5 is only for nooby's.