Added: 1 year ago
From: MrNirom
Views: 981
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If you have not visited the website and gone through many of the posts on his blog.. you can find all his comments from Jan through July at (of course you must use the h t t p) abgnw dot c o m / LDS / BofM_Geography_Jan-Jul-2010 dot pdf

    Feel free to ask any questions.

  • If you have not visited the website and gone through many of the posts on his blog.. you can find all his comments from Jan through July at (of course you must use the h t t p) abgnw dot com / LDS / BofM_Geography_Jan-Jul-2010 dot pdf

    Feel free to ask any questions.

  • If you have not visited the website and gone through many of the posts on his blog.. you can find all his comments from Jan through July at (of course you must use the h t t p) abgnw dot com / LDS / BofM_Geography_Jan-Jul-2010.pd­f

    Feel free to ask any questions.

  • If you have not visited the website and gone through many of the posts on his blog.. you can find all his comments from Jan through July at (of course you must use the h t t p) abgnw dot com / LDS / BofM_Geography_Jan-Jul-2010.pd­f

    Feel free to ask any questions.

  • @AntiCitizenX This work is obviously not for you. It is ok.. you can move on.

  • @AntiCitizenX Do you need verification from outside sources to make up you own mind as to what is true and what is not? Let me ask you this.. If you take wood from an old barn that was built 500 years ago.. and build a new barn with it... how old is the new barn?

    I took the chance and I spent the money to read what he had to say. As I said before.. what he has written is very compelling. I gave you his website and his blog.. you can ask him questions directly. He did the research!

  • @AntiCitizenX The Book is there to read. It is very compelling. It has what you are looking for. It is called.. "Lehi never saw Mesoamerica" by Del DowDell. You can also go to the author's web site at nephicode dot blogspot dot com. All this info was in the little clip I made.. did you not see it?

  • South America now? What positive evidence do you have for this supposition other than your pre-existing bias that the Boom of Mormon is true no matter what? Do you have any indication for large cities capable of supporting populations in the millions? Or Christian belief among the natives? Or iron-working among the artifacts? You can't just flatly assert wild propositions and expect people to find it compelling.

  • @AntiCitizenX Let me ask you this.. If the answer to your questions was yes.. would it change your mind about the Book of Mormon?

    So.. here is the answers. There is much positive evidence. Yes on the large cities,., yes on the Christian belief among the natives, and yes on the iron working among the artifacts.

    I submit the info not to convince.. but to compel those interested to search and investigate more for themselves.

  • another theory mormon scholars can't even agree on .

    Where is Zarahemla

  • @kramd1 Are you expecting to see a sign over the town center that says.. "Welcome to Zarahemla"? This theory is not that old. As with all things.. it takes time. Much research was done on this theory and until you can get someone to spends millions of dollars doing archeological research.. we just have to be patient and wait.

  • @MrNirom 180 years later. No evidence of a great nation has been found. You would think the book of mormon would be a text book for archaeologic digs. But as it does not offer a map it remains a figment in the minds of the faithful.

    Where is Zarahemla ?

  • @kramd1 What does 180 years have to do with anything? The Book of Mormon did not come with a map. No wonder it is not so easily found. Had the book been found in the ground on a archeological dig.. then you would assume to find more there. But that is not the case. Just because the city has not been dub up yet.. does not mean it is not there. You can say it is a figment in the minds of the faithful but that statement can not be proven just because they haven't discovered it yet.

  • @MrNirom And the fact remains that not one artefact or place name of the claims Joseph Smith made about the book of mormon people can be verified in the real world. You have your faith and that is what it is. FAITH

    To tout "evidence" "geography" "proof" as many of the mormon videos attempt to do is nothing short of deceitful, you yourself admit "be patient" and wait for the proof. The story to date if fictional. Relies totally on spiritual testimony. That's faith not evidence.

  • @kramd1 Now.. that is not true. There is the artifact of the place called Nahom. And from there.. it says in the Book of Mormon that they traveled EAST and came to what they called Bountiful which they built a boat. How did Joseph Smith know that there was indeed a place in the Arabian dessert called Nahom.. and indeed if you did go west you would come to an area that indeed did have trees to make a boat???

  • @MrNirom Hahom is crap... How does NHM = Nahom ?

  • Where do you have the Jaredites living? And where do you have the cement building being?

  • @omiolo2 From what I get from the book.. the Jaredites where in the land northward.. north of the narrow neck of land.. in the land of Desolation. Hel 3:6-11

  • @MrNirom where does that correlate to in terms of South American geography?

  • @omiolo2 You can find a picture that I uploaded here: abgnw dot com/LDS/Land_of_Promise.jpg

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more