@MJRockX My individual pure experiance is that what you say is not true. My reality is that reality IS reality and not what I say reality is. If relativistic post modernism is true than my statements that they are not true are true.....true?
Postmodernism, is really a coming out of a denial, and seeing things the way they really are. Deconstruction is really an attempt to explain the state of what is happening to the world around us whether we like it or not.
It's stepping back to observe a bigger picture, one where mankind really can be viewed for what it really is, namely that we are all living on this planet at a level of equivalence whether we like it or not.
@MJRockX That would all be true if it weren't for the fact that legitimate revisionist historians and other intellectuals and researchers (and their lawyers) are jailed for engaging in precisely the kind of objective truth seeking that you describe. See: zundelsite(dot)org/victims/victims_of_zion.html
"namely that we are all living on this planet at a level of equivalence whether we like it or not." -- there is no meaning in that sentence. Postmodernism is the art of plausible Bulls**t.
Hmmmm, very nice, I especially like the way you combine sex with violence. It is used in the same satirical statements and treated as morally equivalent; sex and violence both evil. But to deny this is a lie isnt it.
(MJRockX) I believe Jesus loves me, because my bible tells me so, What is societal deconstruction? Let me tell you what our enemies say that deconstruction is, now listen to me, and then we can attack that position.
Its also funny as well, so those viewers can relax, lower their defenses reject reason and logic while jumping on board with, all the fallacies, pesudoreasoning, ad-homonym and all the fun stuff there is to be among, (the included) the recruits to defend the archaic, medieval against the witches who are plotting attack. We must burn them! Com on everybody lets join together against this evil and save the world!
A well thought out, and semi professionally produced FRAUD!
Rather than dogmatize the unanswerable, let the mystery of the unknown compell us to discuss it for centuries to come. Your rationalization of morality is no better than a Jew's, Muslim's or Khalihari Bushman's. Sex is great, excessive drinking is fun, and murder and war are as natural a product of ego as you making 'a' God a 'Him'. Kindly stop producing these silly videos, you must know they're painfully embarressing to watch.
With the use of your numerous multi-syllable words, it seems that you would have come to the realization that your comments disparaging the point of view of the maker of the video refutes the premise from which you made the comment.
I was referring to your premise that morality is just a construction of man and it's culture. The premise behind this is that there is no absolute truth, or at least no way of knowing what truth is, and should just be discussed without ever reaching any conclusion on the matter.
With that premise who are you to say that the video maker's conclusions are silly or embarrassing?
That may be a premis used by another reader, but Deconstruction, or Pragmatisim, Naturalisim, Relativism, all of those (Lables) at their core hold the absolute truth to be the individual's pure experiance which is unique, changes from time-space plank to the next.
There is a truth theory for a natural language which is nothing more or less than an empirical explanation of the causal relations which hold between the features of the environment and the holding true of sentences. This is what is meant by relative truth, nothing more, nothing less.
For one to say that someone's declaration is silly or embarrassing, one must have already established ABSOLUTELY what is not silly or embarrassing. You are dogmatizing that no one should dogmatize. You have refuted yourself.
As far as I can tell, I did not codify anything. I provided an opinion on (according to you and among other things) the difference between silly and not silly, embaressing and not embarresing--without condemning anyone. We do the same with emotions, colors, grammar, aesthetics, and so on. Unlike the the Ultimate Question and the 'correct' morality, a declaration regarding what is silly and embarressing seems a bit less profound.
You did not codify anything in your statement, however, in order to make such a statement of opinion about one's declaration about the Ultimate Question you necessarily are of the belief that making a declaration of truth about the Ultimate Question is wrong (otherwise why call it silly or embarrassing?). Therefore, you have taken an ABSOLUTE stance on this issue as well. Namely, that it is wrong to make an absolute statement about the Ultimate Question.
This is exactly what you are criticizing the makers of the video for; making an absolute statement about the Ultimate Question. You say that this issue is unanswerable. By saying the answer of correct morality is unanswerable, you are declaring an answer about correct morality; namely that there is none. A more astute relativist would have realized that making any kind of criticism about the proclamation of an absolutist would refute the criticism.
When your morality infringes on minorities, then you become narrow minded or intolerant... Only be intolerant to the ones who will take another life and I do not prejudge someone who is different in a physical, ethnic, religion, sexual orientation, or physical expression differences and have freedom of choice as long as it doesnt harm anyone.. What I'm trying to say is ... It's highly exaggerated.
It also depends on what you mean when you speak of morality. "An ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will" falls outside of the morality margins. set your own morals. Do not be threatened by the minorities, as long as you keep peace and make peace. what could go wrong? I believe in keeping balance.. killers, rapists, molesters, haters, ect. proves that moralization, to an extent is necessary.
What was the point of this video? Do you agree or disagree with post-modernism, I know its suppose to be a spoof of post-modernism but you did a terrible job of projecting your opinion on the matter.
cleverly made, but since when do differing morals mean no morals at all? If people have been deconstructing modernity and experimenting in a post-modern world it is because the world is just that: post-modern. the nazi bit is ridiculous. if anyone has fascist tendencies it is the christian right.
I'm a liberal jew who thinks this is a very smart film. in many ways post modern, love the self refexivity - and it posses the questions pomo needs to answer. can information be organized so that some is valuable?
true value is scarcity. there is too much information--ie everything--for it to ever become valuable on its own. it can only become valuable and important if those in power say so
Do liberal Jewish people still emphasize the importance of marrying only those of the Jewish race? I have often thought that Hitler was just in a sense trying to copy the success of the Jewish model, except replacing it with "Aryans". Do you have any thoughts on this?
yo're right completely, they were created as mirroring each others. jewish talmud is the most ethnocentric, anti gentile doctrine that is the main reason for their exclsivity throghot the 2000 years of history. watch with an open mind the videos exposing talmud qotes
We often hear the predictable blather from "conservative" commentators on radio and television, including blowhards like Sean Hannity and many others stating that the attack on Christianity and traditional values in America is being waged by a "radical Left" or "liberalism" or "secular humanists" or a "liberal media elite." This is all inane pap. The full-scale war on Christ and Christians has been waged by one group of people the Talmudic anti-Christ Jews
So satan chose to use only one group to attack Christ's church? How about the Jesuits, the Catholic "church", the bilderbergers, the Skull & Bones, the CFR, CIA, NSA, etc, etc?
There are literally hundreds of organizations shaping western culture into a dark, satanic form.
And the LORD said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 10 They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers. (quotes from the bible)
Truth being unknowable does not mean that there is no truth. Truth in this context should be seen as a process. Truth, reality, language, these are all anthropomorphic and should be treated as such. postmodernism does not equate to all points of view being true or correct, all it says is that all of them stand on the same footing and are open to debate, it is a democratization of truth, the freeing of truth from the archaic and idiotic notion of hierarchy and absoluteness. This video is kitsch
These people are so disillusioned as to believe they have a total and absolute monopoly on so-called "truth". I wonder whether or not they recognize their own human intuition used in cherry picking scriptures.
They're not saying *they* have a monopoly on absolute truth, but that absolute truth exists and is knowable. Seriously. Everyone in the world has gone wonky with this power-mad way of thinking that it gives me a headache.
Ted Pike's niece. She is a cute girl. I hope she is happy to be married to that young man that she chose.
FishEaster 1 year ago
I don't watch Talmudvision. Some right thinking folks in Clackamas.
TheBilderturdGroup 1 year ago
wow, disinformation, blatant lies, fear and hate mongering, and completely unbelievable... just like the real news! good job;)
Poisonfrogg 1 year ago
@MJRockX My individual pure experiance is that what you say is not true. My reality is that reality IS reality and not what I say reality is. If relativistic post modernism is true than my statements that they are not true are true.....true?
What.........wait?
despisable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How dare postmodernism undermine objective truth! It's not going to shake my objective belief in a magical Jewish man who floated to heaven.
thejobloshow 1 year ago
Comment removed
thejobloshow 1 year ago
Stay tuned
MJRockX 2 years ago
I dont want to be an American Idiot!
One Nation Controlled by the Media!
Living in the age of Hysteria,,,
Welcome to the mind-fUk America....
MJRockX 2 years ago
Postmodernism, is really a coming out of a denial, and seeing things the way they really are. Deconstruction is really an attempt to explain the state of what is happening to the world around us whether we like it or not.
It's stepping back to observe a bigger picture, one where mankind really can be viewed for what it really is, namely that we are all living on this planet at a level of equivalence whether we like it or not.
MJRockX 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MJRockX That would all be true if it weren't for the fact that legitimate revisionist historians and other intellectuals and researchers (and their lawyers) are jailed for engaging in precisely the kind of objective truth seeking that you describe. See: zundelsite(dot)org/victims/victims_of_zion.html
"namely that we are all living on this planet at a level of equivalence whether we like it or not." -- there is no meaning in that sentence. Postmodernism is the art of plausible Bulls**t.
FalseNarrative 2 months ago
Post modernism is not easy to explain, look at some postmodern art to help make sence out of it.
MJRockX 2 years ago
a) My Opinion:
It is surprising to me that someone put this much effort into the above production.
Obviously someone is not going down easily, but want to war, meaning all bets are off.
Including logic, reason and good will toward humanity.
MJRockX 2 years ago
1)
Hmmmm, very nice, I especially like the way you combine sex with violence. It is used in the same satirical statements and treated as morally equivalent; sex and violence both evil. But to deny this is a lie isnt it.
(MJRockX) I believe Jesus loves me, because my bible tells me so, What is societal deconstruction? Let me tell you what our enemies say that deconstruction is, now listen to me, and then we can attack that position.
MJRockX 2 years ago
2)
Its also funny as well, so those viewers can relax, lower their defenses reject reason and logic while jumping on board with, all the fallacies, pesudoreasoning, ad-homonym and all the fun stuff there is to be among, (the included) the recruits to defend the archaic, medieval against the witches who are plotting attack. We must burn them! Com on everybody lets join together against this evil and save the world!
A well thought out, and semi professionally produced FRAUD!
MJRockX 2 years ago
Rather than dogmatize the unanswerable, let the mystery of the unknown compell us to discuss it for centuries to come. Your rationalization of morality is no better than a Jew's, Muslim's or Khalihari Bushman's. Sex is great, excessive drinking is fun, and murder and war are as natural a product of ego as you making 'a' God a 'Him'. Kindly stop producing these silly videos, you must know they're painfully embarressing to watch.
dt3486 2 years ago
With the use of your numerous multi-syllable words, it seems that you would have come to the realization that your comments disparaging the point of view of the maker of the video refutes the premise from which you made the comment.
guerocristiano 2 years ago
This video is hardly a discussion, friend.
dt3486 2 years ago
I was referring to your premise that morality is just a construction of man and it's culture. The premise behind this is that there is no absolute truth, or at least no way of knowing what truth is, and should just be discussed without ever reaching any conclusion on the matter.
With that premise who are you to say that the video maker's conclusions are silly or embarrassing?
guerocristiano 2 years ago
That may be a premis used by another reader, but Deconstruction, or Pragmatisim, Naturalisim, Relativism, all of those (Lables) at their core hold the absolute truth to be the individual's pure experiance which is unique, changes from time-space plank to the next.
MJRockX 2 years ago
There is a truth theory for a natural language which is nothing more or less than an empirical explanation of the causal relations which hold between the features of the environment and the holding true of sentences. This is what is meant by relative truth, nothing more, nothing less.
MJRockX 2 years ago
For one to say that someone's declaration is silly or embarrassing, one must have already established ABSOLUTELY what is not silly or embarrassing. You are dogmatizing that no one should dogmatize. You have refuted yourself.
guerocristiano 2 years ago
As far as I can tell, I did not codify anything. I provided an opinion on (according to you and among other things) the difference between silly and not silly, embaressing and not embarresing--without condemning anyone. We do the same with emotions, colors, grammar, aesthetics, and so on. Unlike the the Ultimate Question and the 'correct' morality, a declaration regarding what is silly and embarressing seems a bit less profound.
dt3486 2 years ago
You did not codify anything in your statement, however, in order to make such a statement of opinion about one's declaration about the Ultimate Question you necessarily are of the belief that making a declaration of truth about the Ultimate Question is wrong (otherwise why call it silly or embarrassing?). Therefore, you have taken an ABSOLUTE stance on this issue as well. Namely, that it is wrong to make an absolute statement about the Ultimate Question.
guerocristiano 2 years ago
This is exactly what you are criticizing the makers of the video for; making an absolute statement about the Ultimate Question. You say that this issue is unanswerable. By saying the answer of correct morality is unanswerable, you are declaring an answer about correct morality; namely that there is none. A more astute relativist would have realized that making any kind of criticism about the proclamation of an absolutist would refute the criticism.
guerocristiano 2 years ago
Have we reached a conclusion with this conversation?
guerocristiano 2 years ago
That is because this video is not a statement. It's merely an appeal to emotive force.
MJRockX 2 years ago
IN a sence I agree.
MJRockX 2 years ago
This video may or may not be funny.
jhhwild 3 years ago
Sarcasm isn't your long suit. But that's alright. Sepo.
NoSepo101 3 years ago
you sign your youtube comments. what the hell.
bobzilla211 3 years ago
When your morality infringes on minorities, then you become narrow minded or intolerant... Only be intolerant to the ones who will take another life and I do not prejudge someone who is different in a physical, ethnic, religion, sexual orientation, or physical expression differences and have freedom of choice as long as it doesnt harm anyone.. What I'm trying to say is ... It's highly exaggerated.
JennaSPLOOSH 3 years ago
It also depends on what you mean when you speak of morality. "An ye Harm None, Do As Ye Will" falls outside of the morality margins. set your own morals. Do not be threatened by the minorities, as long as you keep peace and make peace. what could go wrong? I believe in keeping balance.. killers, rapists, molesters, haters, ect. proves that moralization, to an extent is necessary.
JennaSPLOOSH 3 years ago
Ummm .. OK, I don't know whether to laugh or be offended as a minority. Are you trying to say that Diversity is about letting everyone out of Jail?
JennaSPLOOSH 3 years ago
What was the point of this video? Do you agree or disagree with post-modernism, I know its suppose to be a spoof of post-modernism but you did a terrible job of projecting your opinion on the matter.
underdog3 3 years ago
Oh Catastrophe! I think I feel a change in the weather, the sky is surely falling! Let's find an acorn and call it the sky!
musicalposter 3 years ago
exactly what are you trying to say?
dragonguyver 3 years ago
umm thats slim fast not SIN FAST..
nice photoshop skillz.. also thats just a bunch of commericals.
sspoke 3 years ago
its boring.
lmscheerleader12 3 years ago
Why is everyone so afraid of post-modernists, come on, are these people really the most dangerous people in our society.
jacobins3000 3 years ago 3
These people mock what they don't understand.
JasonWho13 3 years ago
it was a SLIGHTlY shallow agrument, but all true
fissure226 3 years ago
Totally lame -- it would help if you had any idea what you were talking about...
jwyoder 3 years ago
you guys are idiots and have proven yourselfs to be bigoted christians. i hope one day you'll wake up.
CanadianButterfly 4 years ago
Funny stuff!
thoughtoutmedia 4 years ago
Post-modernism is a bunch of nonsence, but im not sure exacly what post-modernism has to do with praising Hitler or eating soap.
jacobins3000 4 years ago
Cool
TurtleMoment 4 years ago
cleverly made, but since when do differing morals mean no morals at all? If people have been deconstructing modernity and experimenting in a post-modern world it is because the world is just that: post-modern. the nazi bit is ridiculous. if anyone has fascist tendencies it is the christian right.
elysiumacronical7 4 years ago
Something tells me the makers of this video have conservative Christian leanings.
Rainbowsalt31 4 years ago 2
excellent! ;)
sanchezdot 4 years ago
this seems like it was a uni assignment...
cairnsey87 4 years ago
Great video! It translates postmodern jargon into plain English and it shows the absurdity of following postmodernism to its logical end.
raspeaker 4 years ago
what the fuck is "postmodernity"? does this general short-hand even fucking point to anything like a homogenous set of ideas or philosophies?
0neironaut 4 years ago
I'm a liberal jew who thinks this is a very smart film. in many ways post modern, love the self refexivity - and it posses the questions pomo needs to answer. can information be organized so that some is valuable?
jplanchua 4 years ago
true value is scarcity. there is too much information--ie everything--for it to ever become valuable on its own. it can only become valuable and important if those in power say so
defdeezy 4 years ago
Do liberal Jewish people still emphasize the importance of marrying only those of the Jewish race? I have often thought that Hitler was just in a sense trying to copy the success of the Jewish model, except replacing it with "Aryans". Do you have any thoughts on this?
platonicideal1 3 years ago
yo're right completely, they were created as mirroring each others. jewish talmud is the most ethnocentric, anti gentile doctrine that is the main reason for their exclsivity throghot the 2000 years of history. watch with an open mind the videos exposing talmud qotes
yahwehdirtydog 3 years ago
We often hear the predictable blather from "conservative" commentators on radio and television, including blowhards like Sean Hannity and many others stating that the attack on Christianity and traditional values in America is being waged by a "radical Left" or "liberalism" or "secular humanists" or a "liberal media elite." This is all inane pap. The full-scale war on Christ and Christians has been waged by one group of people the Talmudic anti-Christ Jews
yahwehdirtydog 3 years ago
So satan chose to use only one group to attack Christ's church? How about the Jesuits, the Catholic "church", the bilderbergers, the Skull & Bones, the CFR, CIA, NSA, etc, etc?
There are literally hundreds of organizations shaping western culture into a dark, satanic form.
fxtrader92 2 years ago
And the LORD said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem. 10 They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers. (quotes from the bible)
yahwehdirtydog 2 years ago
Well, at least their hearts are in the right place. Postmodernism is one of the most absurd schools of philosophy ever conceived of.
intricatic2 4 years ago
or so you say
defdeezy 4 years ago
its a school? i thought the term was meant to convey a discontinuity and fracture of thought. fucking moron.
0neironaut 4 years ago
These people have very small understanding of post modernism.
Questionablescum 4 years ago
Nice video
offthetable 4 years ago
THIS IS VERY FUNNY.
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
Truth being unknowable does not mean that there is no truth. Truth in this context should be seen as a process. Truth, reality, language, these are all anthropomorphic and should be treated as such. postmodernism does not equate to all points of view being true or correct, all it says is that all of them stand on the same footing and are open to debate, it is a democratization of truth, the freeing of truth from the archaic and idiotic notion of hierarchy and absoluteness. This video is kitsch
sokarII 4 years ago
I don't think post modernism says morality is "false", it is, however, a social construct... and somewhat of a biological one.
visioninverse 4 years ago
These people are so disillusioned as to believe they have a total and absolute monopoly on so-called "truth". I wonder whether or not they recognize their own human intuition used in cherry picking scriptures.
Chilla2MaTuna 4 years ago
They're not saying *they* have a monopoly on absolute truth, but that absolute truth exists and is knowable. Seriously. Everyone in the world has gone wonky with this power-mad way of thinking that it gives me a headache.
intricatic2 4 years ago