WTC 7 reported collapsed too soon by BBC News 24

[RugtimXII]

I just want to say that in September, the time zone used in New York is EDT, or GMT-4, which means, that when this was broadcast in the United Kingdom at 21:54, the local time in New York was 17:54. I'm not saying that Bush didn't knock down the towers or that Jane Standley wasn't "standling" in front of the WTC7. I'm just saying that at the time of this broadcast it was 5:54 PM in New York.

[Reflecter]

@RugtimXII...As that shits even confused me. ..

What you are suggesting now is instead of pre-cognition, we have post voyeuristic intentions, as WTC7 fell completely at 5:21:10 NYT and began at 5:20:33. Meaning Jane is 'standling' before a blue screen window of a pre NY skyline, saying a building (hasn't yet) behind her collapsed but will (already has) by means known only to future 2003-8 reports as to flimsy reasons why?

I only keep the damn video up here for histories sake! So pls reply.

[RugtimXII]

@Reflecter: I'm suggesting nothing but that when this report was broadcast, the time was 5:54 PM in New York, and that the BBC reported the collapse 33 minutes after it happened.

[w1lf1ewoo]

So why, why would BBC report this before it actually happened if they were part of a CIA conspiracy? - Do you honestly think the CIA trusts BBC journalists??? Really??? It was a mistake or the onscreen clock was a mistake. There were all kinds of mistaken reports that day as there always is in the midsts of terrible events. As usual conspircists put 2 & 2 together and end up with 5 or even 911

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo What?!! How the fuck can you put this down to mistaken reporting? They are reporting the collapse of a building 20 minutes before it happened, how on earth is that a mistake? What are the chances of saying a whole building collapsed when it hadnt, then 20 minutes later that building collapsing? Fuckin waken up man! Its closed minded idiots like you that the Elite are relying on

[w1lf1ewoo]

@bigderekkeene Actually you're so right! I know bcs I work for the gov't and we're here to control your mind. We thought it would be a really good idea to tell the BBC that we were about to dynamite WTC 7. (actually the BBC staff are all evil drones we've programmed to fool the close-minded idiots out there) didn't you know that?. You see It's my and my colleagues' job to help you build up a paranoid world of your own making- and then come for you! How we doin Derek? ; )

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo Yeah, your levels of sarcasm are extraordinary!! Superhuman in fact. You are true black belt, fifth dan of sarcasm, no doubt. However, your efforts in using ridicule are sad. It seems that most of the closed minded idiots, when faced with one of the many harrowing realities of this event generally opt for this tactic instead of facing up to its harsh reality. How does it make you feel that you were completely unable to come up with any kind of original, independant reply?

[w1lf1ewoo]

@bigderekkeene Ha! All big accidents/incidents/crimes don't tightly fit together like a giant million piece jigsaw puzzle.what they require is intelligent investigation. You have an inner need to feel smart bcs you lack that reality. something doesnt add up at a glance- suddenley your the man with the answers right? ha!Way smarter than the masses of idiots around you..2 questions 4 U..why did the govt destroy WTC7 and tell the BBC? ;>

bigderekkeene 8 hours ago

bigderekkeene 8 hours ago

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo Wrong, im not the man with all the answers, and nor have i claimed in any of my comments that i am, perhaps if you'd spent less time being a tit and more time reading my comments you'd have seen this, Why not do just 15 minutes research on why that building would have been considered for demolition and you might have your eyes slightly opened instead of just jumping on the bandwagon of ridicule. Perhaps you feel the 9/11 commission was an intelligent investigation?

[w1lf1ewoo]

@bigderekkeene There are things that dont clearly fit- but YOU OFFER NO SOUND EXPLANATION- Just the same old LEAP LEAP SPLASH MENTALITY Why dont you go and bother the NASAmoon landings or princess diana, and the BBC?..thanks for conveniently not answering that..bcs even you know that is implausable that the staff of the BBC in London could be "in on your CONSPIRACY " anyway Im bored with you and this B.S. - feel free to reply and have the last word which Im sure you'll want/need.- yawn

[bigderekkeene]

@w1lf1ewoo yeah, again well done on not reading a single thing i have written down you'll see in my comments ive made no leaping or splashing in my comments merely pointed out the fact that this reporter managed to report on a total building collapse which hadnt even happened and then did happen twenty minutes later.I have merely pointed out this astounding piece of forsight, to those idiots who try and dismiss this occurance with ridicule, in short brain dead tits like you!!!

[rockbysea]

there is no argument here...all those who try to spin this are simply government paid debunkers...my suggestion is to ignore them and correspond with those who stand for truth

[Ginaza]

Fuck me,so that's why Google really wanted Youtube.This is a sick world.

[JoCa555]

They can remove it from Google/Youtube, but there are so much people like me, who downloaded the videos on harddisk and will upload it, even daily when necessarily.

[IcelandNow]

If any evidence were required that the media is controlled by intelligence agencies, it has been proven. The BBC have even issued a statement admitting the authenticity of the BBC World & BBC News 24 footage and THEN claiming they have lost the tapes of 9-11 footage...how likely is that? What amazing synchronicity! Why haven't the mass media here in the U.S. and in Europe made this a front-page, headline news story? Wy are Google repeatedly removing this footage?

[magaga7]

what the hell happened with the WTC7 forenknowledge video with 88,000 plus views. Did the owner take it out?

[bagelred2]

it was removed by Google/CIA. Scared yet?

[JoCa555]

21.54 local time New York? certainly not. can only be London time. This would mean that 6 hours back local time fpr New York was 15.54. But the WTC 7 collapsed at 17.23.

This would be over 1,5 hour too early. How does this fit?

[DanishAAA]

daylight saving time buddy

[CheesynessOnAStick]

daylight saving time was here in september. but that puts us ahead one hour, increasing the time difference.

[HytchJR]

@CheesynessOnAStick - er...it's standing in the background of the reporter claiming it had collapsed...

[ineptgod]

timestamp proves the timing (EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NEVER THE ISSUE)