ANYBODY WHO SPONSORS WIKIPEDO BASTARDS IS ABSOLUTE IDIOT PEDO! ORIGINAL NAME FOR WIKIPEDIA WAS WIKIPEDOIA!KEEP WAR GOIN YO,CHECK MYPAGE N USELESSPWIKIPEEDOS BOOKMARK EM PRINT READ ALL: GIVE TO ALL WIKIPEDIA-WATCHORG RULES TRUE1OO%!
Wikipedia sucks. They intentionally censored out the fact that NH AG cum U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte believes she can threaten to arrest which reporters she does not like at publicly-advertised political rallies held on commercial property
Watch this video at KingCast65:
Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia = bought & sold hypocrites who cannot be trusted
Their last excuse? I can't prove Kelly knows about it. Too bad I served her at her house. She & McCain love throwing out black reporters Stephen Price.
Wkipedia admins are ban happy anmyore,it is ok for them and their bots to vandalise pages,but god forbidsomone tries to make an honest contribution and//or criticise admins.
@Sismiques I agree, I just tried to make a rational addition/modification and they just delete and redirect it again, AGAIN, AGAIN and AGAIN! I thought I was making a mistake, nope, they are, because they're far too bias against our contributions.
I just saved the page in a text doc, the heck with them, it's mine now! :-)
Ok, obviously you have no idea what you are talking about. I noticed you said that admins ban you for trying to change one thing that may be false. But if you think about it, they dont have time to check if it is false or not ok? And it's like this, if they dont have the time they will ban you for any huge change in the article. And just because of you I'm going to have to make a video provin nothing is wrong with wikipedia!!!
Wikipedia admins are one sided and close minded bigots who alone are deciding which source is reliable and which one is not. In most cases admins delete even those sources who are reliable, and simply because they don't like them.
That's why uncyclopedia-the complete satire of wikipedia, rules.
There's a new wiki out there that allows viewpoints from opposing sides called Bickerpedia. It's by no means comprehensive, but Bickerpedia is new and specializes in all things controversial.
They suck thanks for the video they are helping a convicted dog killer to proote dog fighting named anna frumina.
You and I google the name she uses there is afru and you find convictions . But I put a new york times link proving she is promoting dog figthing as a test and im banned.
I wonder how these editors spend so much time on wiki arguing with other innocents and pissing off people. wiki is full of gossip with useless information,shameless beggars think they provide great services. quit wiki and don't let these moron editors control the internet.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I didn't watch your video, I just read the comments and realized you're just like every other elitist prick that wants to be internet famous. You "destroy" all the people that think you're an asshat, but have you ever stopped to think the reason so many people think that may be for good reason?
Don't bother replying, I won't be reading it. But congrats on joining the not-even-close-to-exclusive club of internet assholes.
dipshit haha that a good one. im not the 1 ranting about something u cant do fuck all to stop them doing wot they do.if u dont like wiki dont fucking use it simple really.u think acting hard on youtube going to get u somwhere well hate to tell u but its not.its only going to get u msgs like this so go spit up the spunk that clogging u mind dude ur full of it by the sound of ur vids.oh and sorry about the loon thing ur not a loon ur a dick
"Acting hard"? ROFL! What an idiot. I'm not trying to be a stupid thug or some shit. Acting? That part is right. It's called entertainment, and having some fun, dumbass.
And yeah, I get entertainment out of idiots like you with no life repeatedly trying to start shit, and getting destroyed. So yeah, I'm getting exactly what I want. People like you boost the view count. So congrats on helping me :)
And I'm not a dick, I'm a Jackass. Get it right. :)
Dude, i just wrote a kick-ass good article on wikipedia called "Multi-driver speaker systems, but it's hard to find references and i already knew all the info on it. if it's erased i'll be sooooo pissed. it's so solid. check it out.
OMG this vid is cool i was just on wiki and as usual they give me shit. i write SOME SCIENTIFIC arguments against darwin's theory and they delete threaten ban dont listen etc. just like he said. im with u on this
i believe in evolution like i do newtonian gravity because they are factually proven but like newtonian gravity does not apply in the majority of the universe so einstien had to come in, so too do parts of darwins theory need confrontation for being illogical/unfactual. point is stubbern close minded people should not censor scientific/logical points cause their used to only christians and their religious stuff. if u want info see my vid AND THE LINKS in it dont just downplay/assume etc.
so modern theory of evolution is not darwins theory? i never heard that and i thought i heard it all. the only other model of evolution was vedic evolution. but please give some detail.
btw under the "objects to evolution section" i put majority of people dont believe in darwins theory, SOURCED by CBS. an AGNOSTIC changed it to say 51% of americans dont believe. THAT WAS EVEN BETTER. wiki editors DELETED it AND the whole SECTION soon afterwards! the said its not fair to include that poll, even though they DID the SAME polling thing to promote abortions! BIAS ARROGANT HYPOCRITE FUCKS
I just thought of something, the war could also be called the wikipedian revolution or the wikipedian reformation because the goal is not to end wikipedia, it's just to reform it's ways so that it is not so corrupt and discriminating.
The article is not gone, it's now on my userpage as one of my subpages. If you type "The War on Wikipedia" in the searchbox, it will redirect to my user subpage, "user:Daniel Christensen/The War On Wikipedia."
Hey, thanks a lot for that. GREAT article, even though it was deleted RIGHT after I checked it. Even though it completely goes by the rules, has notability, references, etc. See my point?
If I were you, I'd just put it right back up. Any way, thanks for more fuel for Part 4 lol
No, you don't, but I believe this "war" needs to be serious, for I have seen huge discrimination by Wikipedia's administrators(aka dictators). it needs to stop. they have erased some of my articles with no discussion; no warning. that's bullshit.
Yeah, I've noticed. And they're doing it now, and you've been completely in the right.
Though I do throw my comedy in, I do take this issue seriously, and I will continue to push it until we can get something done. So for now, I'm going to keep focusing on at least a couple more videos within the next couple weeks, and trying to get a lot more names on that signature.
It wouldn't hurt to ponder more silently. Especially in a place like this.
Let's be honest here, by "pondering" these "thoughts" you hoped to somehow defend wiwipedia for all you know about it which I can easily say isn't very much since (hell!) you defend it!
By insulting them you try to fight Wiwipedia's battles for them instead of going off into your little "pondering" corner and remaining neutral about your stance and "assuming good faith".
And dude, how am I defending them? I'm going against them. It IS MY War. I started this, I'm against them, not defending them. That's the whole point of this.
Unless you're replying to someone else lol. If so, your comments just show up as their own, not replies.
Lol I know exactly what's going on. More has happened than I've explained on here. I'm the only one who completely understands. Just hear me out man.
I've made minor edits, yes. But I've also made a FULL page that took quite a lot of time to make, and they did delete it. So I have the same experience.
And they attacked me for being in the right, and constantly harassed me.
You do know that when new pages are created the have to be seconded by any user in the world not an admin within I think its 1 hour. The admins didn't delete it the program did it saw it as spam. Read the TOS and how WP works!
I've been wanting to see what happened but you want show anyone, you only talk about it, show the records or the text you posted. Stop saying anything until you show evidence. So far everything you have done is against the law, under the first amendment. You have done nothing but spreed slander! Until you produce evidence its nothing more than slander towards the owners of Wikipedia, and that is not protected by the freedom of speech. Produce evidence, I've watched the videos and its not there.
I don't even care! I think its funny that you nothing better to do that start a stupid war on a non-profit organization that owns there own site that doesn't have do anything you say. But if you want to waste your time go for it. Like I said I don't care! Do what you want to.
I do have better things to do, like work 2 jobs. But what I do in my spare time, I have every right to do. I'd much rather be doing this, then being you who just goes on the video and starts problems for no reason, lies, and comes off as a total moronic and senseless prick.
Stop contradicting yourself. If you don't care, go away.
Do you even know the definition of slander? Obviously not. I'm not speaking falsehoods, nor damaging one's character at all. I've not even mentioned individual names, nor is this even against the OWNERS of Wikipedia at all. It's against the admins.
This is fucking awesome wikipedia sucks dick. I also have tried to put true information on wikipedia and they deleted all my good shit. fuck wikipedia
Obviously you don't, if you're fighting against me and this great cause. :)
And no, the point is, I don't want to keep commenting on my own video. That's why. And I want more, real viewers. Not just the same ones over and over again. like yourself.
So message me if you want to discuss, and don't hesitate to link the vid to others. :)
Actually, this is his channel and if he wants you gone, its his call, but if you want to sit here and shoot the shit, that's fine with me. Also, he tried to comply with the rules, and that is when the bullshit began in the first place. He tried and tried to edit everything to their liking but he was still smacked down like a fly on the wall. You call that fair? I call it ridiculous.
They couldnt even give him a reason as to why his page was being deleted. They circled around him like a rodeo clown. That's not fair, that's biased bullshit.
Who are you to say if my intentions are untrue or not? I think I would know much more than you would. Now run along, and stop obsessing over me. This isn't Wikipedia, so you have no jurisdiction here. Later.
You're taking the wrong sense on the word. Dictatorship can mean many things. It can mean, abuse of authority, as well as total bias, etc. The situation at hand here, is considered..you guessed it....a dictatorship.
The motives are simple. Wikipedia is a dictatorship, and as such, actions are being taken. Wikipedia needs to be taught some respect, not me. Wikipedia needs to respect all users, not just a selective many.
I answered you clearly. I'm sorry if you can't comprehend. Learn to listen and read. As I already said, I'm taking action. My intenttions are on the petition. Good enough references and cites for you, WikiBoy?
This man speaks truth.
CentristFiasco 2 months ago
I got many accounts on Wikipedia, and my main account is called A young communist. ;)
HateIronMaiden 7 months ago
ANYBODY WHO SPONSORS WIKIPEDO BASTARDS IS ABSOLUTE IDIOT PEDO! ORIGINAL NAME FOR WIKIPEDIA WAS WIKIPEDOIA!KEEP WAR GOIN YO,CHECK MYPAGE N USELESSPWIKIPEEDOS BOOKMARK EM PRINT READ ALL: GIVE TO ALL WIKIPEDIA-WATCHORG RULES TRUE1OO%!
wikipedosuk 8 months ago
KEEP WAR GOIN YO,CHECK MYPAGE N USELESSPWIKIPEEDOS BOOKMARK EM PRINT READ ALL: GIVE TO ALL WIKIPEDIA-WATCHORG RULES TRUE1OO%!
wikipedosuk 8 months ago
Fuk wikipedia4ever suport read all wikipedia-watch org
wikipedosuk 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wikipedia sucks. They intentionally censored out the fact that NH AG cum U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte believes she can threaten to arrest which reporters she does not like at publicly-advertised political rallies held on commercial property
Watch this video at KingCast65:
Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia = bought & sold hypocrites who cannot be trusted
Their last excuse? I can't prove Kelly knows about it. Too bad I served her at her house. She & McCain love throwing out black reporters Stephen Price.
KingCast65 1 year ago
well I see your doing quite well, miss ya!
xxangelictonesxx 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sismiques 1 year ago
Wkipedia admins are ban happy anmyore,it is ok for them and their bots to vandalise pages,but god forbidsomone tries to make an honest contribution and//or criticise admins.
Sismiques 1 year ago
@Sismiques I agree, I just tried to make a rational addition/modification and they just delete and redirect it again, AGAIN, AGAIN and AGAIN! I thought I was making a mistake, nope, they are, because they're far too bias against our contributions.
I just saved the page in a text doc, the heck with them, it's mine now! :-)
samsungmartiHKM 6 months ago
@samsungmartiHKM
Also, if you make comments on their talkpages, a bot often calls it vandalism.
Sismiques 6 months ago
im in my page was removed because some pric says I dont matter
drrockof5 2 years ago
@drrockof5 LOL. wasn't me, but i used to do that all the time to people. you think you're important enough to be put on an encyclopedia? lmfao
Netalarm 1 year ago
I agree with everything you said.
heartyevangelista 2 years ago
THEY DELETED MY WIKIPEDIA PAGE FOR NO REASON! they said it had "attacks" and "real people" and it was about a comedy cartoon. lol.
supermax110 2 years ago
Ok, obviously you have no idea what you are talking about. I noticed you said that admins ban you for trying to change one thing that may be false. But if you think about it, they dont have time to check if it is false or not ok? And it's like this, if they dont have the time they will ban you for any huge change in the article. And just because of you I'm going to have to make a video provin nothing is wrong with wikipedia!!!
TheKaizerProductions 2 years ago
Thanks for the video
Wikipedia admins are one sided and close minded bigots who alone are deciding which source is reliable and which one is not. In most cases admins delete even those sources who are reliable, and simply because they don't like them.
That's why uncyclopedia-the complete satire of wikipedia, rules.
Truthseeker1412 2 years ago
I know, I've been blocked for adding an extra theory on something with plenty of evidence, but no!
22poopoo 2 years ago 3
I don't have a problem with much of Wikipedia, it's just that 2/5 of the users are... well... idiots. Very biased ones.
iwebber88 2 years ago
They're all a bunch of cockgobblers, man.
PhilipEbanks 2 years ago
Wikipedia users Aoi, Frehley, and your fellow companions--the foxes of Wikipedia--guardians of false information
Jeneral28 2 years ago
What can we do to get that dicksucking site destroyd? I'll do almost everything!
danhartmanistrueking 2 years ago
Death to tyrants!
VolumeCenter 2 years ago 5
There's a new wiki out there that allows viewpoints from opposing sides called Bickerpedia. It's by no means comprehensive, but Bickerpedia is new and specializes in all things controversial.
dirtyjohnny68 2 years ago
They suck thanks for the video they are helping a convicted dog killer to proote dog fighting named anna frumina.
You and I google the name she uses there is afru and you find convictions . But I put a new york times link proving she is promoting dog figthing as a test and im banned.
planetmolosser 2 years ago
wikipedia sucks ol.
MRINSTRUCTIONBOOK 2 years ago 2
I wonder how these editors spend so much time on wiki arguing with other innocents and pissing off people. wiki is full of gossip with useless information,shameless beggars think they provide great services. quit wiki and don't let these moron editors control the internet.
qfame 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I didn't watch your video, I just read the comments and realized you're just like every other elitist prick that wants to be internet famous. You "destroy" all the people that think you're an asshat, but have you ever stopped to think the reason so many people think that may be for good reason?
Don't bother replying, I won't be reading it. But congrats on joining the not-even-close-to-exclusive club of internet assholes.
BlooddancerLegion 3 years ago
Lmao you won't be reading it? The classic hit and run, little pussy. Funny how you try to judge things, without even watching the videos.
What a fucking moron lmao
I'd pwn you even more, but no need to waste my time. You already did that on your own.
JonHampton 3 years ago 3
Interesting video. But if Wikipedia is such a problem for you, why don't you make your own online free encyclopedia?
ginodoortje 3 years ago
Well, most people don't know how to?
clownhorse 2 years ago
ur a fucking loon get a hobby
ocg23 3 years ago
Being a "Fucking Loon" is my hobby. Learn to pay attention, dipshit. :)
JonHampton 3 years ago
dipshit haha that a good one. im not the 1 ranting about something u cant do fuck all to stop them doing wot they do.if u dont like wiki dont fucking use it simple really.u think acting hard on youtube going to get u somwhere well hate to tell u but its not.its only going to get u msgs like this so go spit up the spunk that clogging u mind dude ur full of it by the sound of ur vids.oh and sorry about the loon thing ur not a loon ur a dick
ocg23 3 years ago
"Acting hard"? ROFL! What an idiot. I'm not trying to be a stupid thug or some shit. Acting? That part is right. It's called entertainment, and having some fun, dumbass.
And yeah, I get entertainment out of idiots like you with no life repeatedly trying to start shit, and getting destroyed. So yeah, I'm getting exactly what I want. People like you boost the view count. So congrats on helping me :)
And I'm not a dick, I'm a Jackass. Get it right. :)
JonHampton 3 years ago
What was the article?
joshjhutton 3 years ago
IM with you all the way man.
SuperBrian92 3 years ago
great video
SuperBrian92 3 years ago
they deleted most of my rap album articles and such
they tried to say i had no refreneces
some guy right
then i check this dude was checking my other stuff out and tried to nominate it for it to be deleted or some shit like that
i got pissed and put about 15-20 references and he didnt bother me after words
SuperBrian92 3 years ago
Dude, i just wrote a kick-ass good article on wikipedia called "Multi-driver speaker systems, but it's hard to find references and i already knew all the info on it. if it's erased i'll be sooooo pissed. it's so solid. check it out.
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
OMG this vid is cool i was just on wiki and as usual they give me shit. i write SOME SCIENTIFIC arguments against darwin's theory and they delete threaten ban dont listen etc. just like he said. im with u on this
Playitalready 3 years ago
"i was just on wiki and as usual they give me shit. i write SOME SCIENTIFIC arguments against darwin's theory"
lol. there has yet to be any valid arguments presented against the theory of evolution.
jtyranus 3 years ago
i believe in evolution like i do newtonian gravity because they are factually proven but like newtonian gravity does not apply in the majority of the universe so einstien had to come in, so too do parts of darwins theory need confrontation for being illogical/unfactual. point is stubbern close minded people should not censor scientific/logical points cause their used to only christians and their religious stuff. if u want info see my vid AND THE LINKS in it dont just downplay/assume etc.
Playitalready 3 years ago
"so too do parts of darwins theory need confrontation for being illogical/unfactual"
ah, you are talking about Darwins original theory as opposed to the modern theory of evolution.
jtyranus 3 years ago
so modern theory of evolution is not darwins theory? i never heard that and i thought i heard it all. the only other model of evolution was vedic evolution. but please give some detail.
Playitalready 3 years ago
"so modern theory of evolution is not darwins theory?"
There are differences between darwins original theory and the modern theory of evolution.
"changed it to say 51% of americans dont believe."
At the bottom of the article it gives a poll on the american public's view of evolution.
"even though they DID the SAME polling thing to promote abortions!"
they used a CBS poll?
jtyranus 3 years ago
btw under the "objects to evolution section" i put majority of people dont believe in darwins theory, SOURCED by CBS. an AGNOSTIC changed it to say 51% of americans dont believe. THAT WAS EVEN BETTER. wiki editors DELETED it AND the whole SECTION soon afterwards! the said its not fair to include that poll, even though they DID the SAME polling thing to promote abortions! BIAS ARROGANT HYPOCRITE FUCKS
Playitalready 3 years ago
btw, my userpage on wikipedia is user:Daniel Christensen.
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
I just thought of something, the war could also be called the wikipedian revolution or the wikipedian reformation because the goal is not to end wikipedia, it's just to reform it's ways so that it is not so corrupt and discriminating.
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
The article is not gone, it's now on my userpage as one of my subpages. If you type "The War on Wikipedia" in the searchbox, it will redirect to my user subpage, "user:Daniel Christensen/The War On Wikipedia."
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
Yeah, the redirect will have to be added again, because they even removed that today.
Thanks for all of the effort though.
JonHampton 3 years ago
On the talk page, i said that they would only be proving your point if they erased it, and they did!
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
Check it out Jon and others. Type in The War on Wikipedia in the search box on wikipedia
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
Hey, thanks a lot for that. GREAT article, even though it was deleted RIGHT after I checked it. Even though it completely goes by the rules, has notability, references, etc. See my point?
If I were you, I'd just put it right back up. Any way, thanks for more fuel for Part 4 lol
Also, do I know you? Lol
JonHampton 3 years ago
No, you don't, but I believe this "war" needs to be serious, for I have seen huge discrimination by Wikipedia's administrators(aka dictators). it needs to stop. they have erased some of my articles with no discussion; no warning. that's bullshit.
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
Yeah, I've noticed. And they're doing it now, and you've been completely in the right.
Though I do throw my comedy in, I do take this issue seriously, and I will continue to push it until we can get something done. So for now, I'm going to keep focusing on at least a couple more videos within the next couple weeks, and trying to get a lot more names on that signature.
JonHampton 3 years ago
I made an article about the war on wikipedia on wikipedia
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
Why don't my comments fuckin work?
ATEFXHGYNH 3 years ago
Talk about a time waster!
SHIRLEY!
for someone who believes this is a waste of time, you surely are on here a lot!
-0cean 360
ocean360 3 years ago
You're relying too heavily by what you've seen first-hand you should do a bit more looking around on the internet.
Certain admins have gone about deleting information they don't like, so go ask around.
You'd be surprised what people have to say about your o' so innocent wikipedia.
bpCodes4u 3 years ago 2
Yeah, they're very corrupt liars lol
JonHampton 3 years ago
It wouldn't hurt to ponder more silently. Especially in a place like this.
Let's be honest here, by "pondering" these "thoughts" you hoped to somehow defend wiwipedia for all you know about it which I can easily say isn't very much since (hell!) you defend it!
By insulting them you try to fight Wiwipedia's battles for them instead of going off into your little "pondering" corner and remaining neutral about your stance and "assuming good faith".
You're half right, it's not YOUR war.
bpCodes4u 3 years ago
And dude, how am I defending them? I'm going against them. It IS MY War. I started this, I'm against them, not defending them. That's the whole point of this.
Unless you're replying to someone else lol. If so, your comments just show up as their own, not replies.
JonHampton 3 years ago
Once again, sorry.
Something weird was happening with my server.
bpCodes4u 3 years ago
Dude (pun not intended), the problem here is
1. You just don't realize the situation.
We've all played by the rules...and got screwed for no good reason! (example)
I created 7 episode synopsis for the first few Powerpuff Girl episodes, AND THEY DELETED IT FOR NO REASON!
2. It has yet to happen to you.
You may be making little minor edits now but wait until you do something big that you can actually be proud of...AND THEY DELETE IT!!!
The shit will really hit your fan then.
Fuck wiki!
bpCodes4u 3 years ago 2
Lol I know exactly what's going on. More has happened than I've explained on here. I'm the only one who completely understands. Just hear me out man.
I've made minor edits, yes. But I've also made a FULL page that took quite a lot of time to make, and they did delete it. So I have the same experience.
And they attacked me for being in the right, and constantly harassed me.
And yes, screw them lol
JonHampton 3 years ago
You do know that when new pages are created the have to be seconded by any user in the world not an admin within I think its 1 hour. The admins didn't delete it the program did it saw it as spam. Read the TOS and how WP works!
jacobc2 3 years ago
Dude, are you crazy, or do you just love spewing out bullcrap for no reason? Lmao
When you actually can see what's going on, and know what happened, then speak. Until then, stop jumping to conclusions and making excuses.
JonHampton 3 years ago
I've been wanting to see what happened but you want show anyone, you only talk about it, show the records or the text you posted. Stop saying anything until you show evidence. So far everything you have done is against the law, under the first amendment. You have done nothing but spreed slander! Until you produce evidence its nothing more than slander towards the owners of Wikipedia, and that is not protected by the freedom of speech. Produce evidence, I've watched the videos and its not there.
jacobc2 3 years ago
I don't even care! I think its funny that you nothing better to do that start a stupid war on a non-profit organization that owns there own site that doesn't have do anything you say. But if you want to waste your time go for it. Like I said I don't care! Do what you want to.
jacobc2 3 years ago
I do have better things to do, like work 2 jobs. But what I do in my spare time, I have every right to do. I'd much rather be doing this, then being you who just goes on the video and starts problems for no reason, lies, and comes off as a total moronic and senseless prick.
Stop contradicting yourself. If you don't care, go away.
JonHampton 3 years ago
LMAO How the HELL is this against the law?
I have my Freedom Of Speech.
Do you even know the definition of slander? Obviously not. I'm not speaking falsehoods, nor damaging one's character at all. I've not even mentioned individual names, nor is this even against the OWNERS of Wikipedia at all. It's against the admins.
And again, sorry if you can't comprehend.
You're more pathetic than I originally thought.
JonHampton 3 years ago
WTF?
How is the freak this happening? I respond to dude527 bullshit comments and they are redirected at you!
Sorry, I don't know what to make of this, but I know you're right.
Don't worry, I guess my server must be broken...or worse.
bpCodes4u 3 years ago 2
Lol it's all right. I think it's just Youtube. It may fix itself in a few days or something. I've seen stuff like this happen before.
JonHampton 3 years ago
Wikipedia sucks.
AngyAndroid 3 years ago
Lol, Mick Foley looking ass. Tight vid.
LileL23 3 years ago 2
foley rules!!!!!
unoibkwllykdat 3 years ago
Good start to somethin great. Keep at it
BitBon 3 years ago
good stuff go get em man
dazednconfused12533 3 years ago
Jon Hampton vs Wikipedia!?!? OH MY!
I'm with ya, bro.
bigbaynemachine 3 years ago 2
i like wiki sometimes.I dont add anything,I use it to get information i dont already know.
Frylok1177 3 years ago 3
This is fucking awesome wikipedia sucks dick. I also have tried to put true information on wikipedia and they deleted all my good shit. fuck wikipedia
amarc621 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
BlooddancerLegion 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe it's because all your "good shit" had the grammatical presentation of a 4 year old.
BlooddancerLegion 3 years ago
Keep on keepin' on!
Screw you Wikipedia Admins!
FozzyFanaticJMH 3 years ago
Haampton! Get the rifles!
Janumzz 3 years ago 2
i love youu!!!! :)
this is amazzingg =]
igit28 3 years ago 2
Obviously you don't, if you're fighting against me and this great cause. :)
And no, the point is, I don't want to keep commenting on my own video. That's why. And I want more, real viewers. Not just the same ones over and over again. like yourself.
So message me if you want to discuss, and don't hesitate to link the vid to others. :)
JonHampton 3 years ago
Actually, this is his channel and if he wants you gone, its his call, but if you want to sit here and shoot the shit, that's fine with me. Also, he tried to comply with the rules, and that is when the bullshit began in the first place. He tried and tried to edit everything to their liking but he was still smacked down like a fly on the wall. You call that fair? I call it ridiculous.
Porterman90 3 years ago
They couldnt even give him a reason as to why his page was being deleted. They circled around him like a rodeo clown. That's not fair, that's biased bullshit.
Porterman90 3 years ago
Even I've fallen victim, where they deleted info I put up, without reasons, and then banned me, without warning (twice, I might add).
caligal2350 3 years ago
Who are you to say if my intentions are untrue or not? I think I would know much more than you would. Now run along, and stop obsessing over me. This isn't Wikipedia, so you have no jurisdiction here. Later.
JonHampton 3 years ago
You're taking the wrong sense on the word. Dictatorship can mean many things. It can mean, abuse of authority, as well as total bias, etc. The situation at hand here, is considered..you guessed it....a dictatorship.
Porterman90 3 years ago
The motives are simple. Wikipedia is a dictatorship, and as such, actions are being taken. Wikipedia needs to be taught some respect, not me. Wikipedia needs to respect all users, not just a selective many.
Porterman90 3 years ago
Hey dude527, take your ass somewhere else. YOU CANNOT STOP THE WAR!
Porterman90 3 years ago
I answered you clearly. I'm sorry if you can't comprehend. Learn to listen and read. As I already said, I'm taking action. My intenttions are on the petition. Good enough references and cites for you, WikiBoy?
JonHampton 3 years ago
Jon we need to get this out to everyone! Wikipedia needs to change there ways!
xcf202 3 years ago
I don't intend to take over. Stop assuming, and actually take time to listen to what I say, and read the petition.
Also, if you cannot comprehend, I suggest you going back to school.
Also, this isn't Wikipedia, so stop spamming my video. Thank you. :)
JonHampton 3 years ago
The intention is to get something done by taking action, and it will happen.
If you want proof that I've only signed the petition once, ask GoPetition fo ra list of IP's, or I could give it to you myself.
It sucks when you're out of your grounds and have no power to control things how you want it, doesn't it?
JonHampton 3 years ago
I agree with your petition.
Jeneral28 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Haha.
SiannaPassoni 3 years ago
Wikipedia sucks
Porterman90 3 years ago 2
just what we need...
another damn war! haha
HFHH! WHOO!
-GFL
ocean360 3 years ago 3
whoot whoot war!!!!!! I like your hat goober
imperialdragonpix 3 years ago 4
Lovin the hat dog =]
AzureVein 3 years ago 2
Haha nice vid dude. LET THE WAR BEGIN!
Porterman90 3 years ago