Bat For Lashes at Homefires IV, Conway Hall, London

[BOLOBO19792000]

Bjork wannabe... hohoho!!!

Much sexier though

[davidcheers]

homefires was incredible!

[vitalibanivur]

she is very similar to BJORK in term of arrangements and vocals in some of her songs, not on her best ones though:What's A Girl To Do or Prescilla

You've got to be deaf of unreasonably stubborn to deny that

[ospididious]

And while I'm at it, she clearly also listens to Sussie and The Banshees, another good choice. Now who's gonna jump on me for that one?

[ospididious]

All I said what I can see the influence... concidering who's been around longer than who, it should be taken as a compliment. Every musician has influences and inspirations, so get off my butt.

[ospididious]

She listens to bjork... not that she's trying to BE bjork... but she does listen to her. I like it!

[isabird]

why is it that every woman that makes original and unique music compared to bjork?

and natasha is a million years more talented than bjork. million dog years.

[votremontre]

LOL i agree ha

[AleXIXandra]

Oh, and people should stop fighting because Bjork herself loves Natasha's music, so...

[medvind]

you just compared them... congrats on the self-contradiction.

björk is fantastic. i'm only just getting into bat for lashes. i wouldn't try to measure and compare people's talent like that, it's totally meaningless.

[isabird]

i agree. comparisons are meaningless. but then again, does everything need to have a meaning in this life? because most björk songs, or even entire albums, make no sense to me. at all.

opinions are always allowed, just as you think bjork is "fantastic" i think she's way too annoying. and i also think natasha khan is very talented and should never be compared to such unpleasant music. i'm happy to contradict myself anytime if it just to vent my frustration over these stupid bjork comparisons.