Anyone who uses fear and violence to force people to act or believe in things they would otherwise not, is a terrorist. Regardless of whether they work for a government or are part of any other group. Terrorism is real, of course it's real.
The bloke who posted this is trying to convince us that real terrorists don't exist, that it's all a government ruse. Well, tell that to my Pakistani friend who lost his cousin in a mosque bombing in Lahore, you bloody clot. If you were in charge of things, London or Washington would be like one of those bomb-blighted cities in Pakistan
In Brazil, there WAS NO terrorism - things were just breaking down, and everything was controlled by Central Services, which was filled with bureaucracy to such an extent, nothing was fixed, and everything was overly complicated and constantly things broke down.
Harry Tuttle was a "terrorist" because he was a rogue APPLIANCE repairman. He was a top wanted man.
@fuzzywzhe It depends on how the government defines terrorism. In our eyes, Tuttle wasn't really a criminal, and even if you look at it by the book, his crime was only a minor one. However, in a society where bureaucracy is a defining characteristic, a person who takes short-cuts and defies procedure could be considered a terrorist. It's interesting that Gilliam never shoes us the common man's attitude towards Tuttle, only the government's.
@zingzangspillip1 However, Tuttle is *not* a terrorist. He would only be labeled one by the Ministry, because he is defying their clumsy attempts to regulate the lives of their citizens. The only terror he creates is created by a proxy, the government.
Oh Jesus Christ, not another Alex Jones guy... you people are all over the Internet like shit. I cant even watch a video about this movie without having that stupid "Infowars.com" thrown in my face. Alex Jones is a complete lunatic.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."-- H.L. Mencken
1984, the movie, was boring as hell. They removed every single thinking from the main character. Though maybe it is just that I loved the book so much ;)
More people should see this film.. maybe they'd wake up and smell the coffee..
DeadOriginal 6 months ago
The TV program at the begining is called "In The Eye" LOL
tiopaul 1 year ago
Anyone who uses fear and violence to force people to act or believe in things they would otherwise not, is a terrorist. Regardless of whether they work for a government or are part of any other group. Terrorism is real, of course it's real.
CBR11X 1 year ago
The bloke who posted this is trying to convince us that real terrorists don't exist, that it's all a government ruse. Well, tell that to my Pakistani friend who lost his cousin in a mosque bombing in Lahore, you bloody clot. If you were in charge of things, London or Washington would be like one of those bomb-blighted cities in Pakistan
kotanos 1 year ago
There was no false flag terrorism in Brazil.
In Brazil, there WAS NO terrorism - things were just breaking down, and everything was controlled by Central Services, which was filled with bureaucracy to such an extent, nothing was fixed, and everything was overly complicated and constantly things broke down.
Harry Tuttle was a "terrorist" because he was a rogue APPLIANCE repairman. He was a top wanted man.
fuzzywzhe 1 year ago 5
@fuzzywzhe
Haha, because, ironically, he was fixing things. Brilliant, I never noticed that possibility!
Jcolinsol 7 months ago
@fuzzywzhe It depends on how the government defines terrorism. In our eyes, Tuttle wasn't really a criminal, and even if you look at it by the book, his crime was only a minor one. However, in a society where bureaucracy is a defining characteristic, a person who takes short-cuts and defies procedure could be considered a terrorist. It's interesting that Gilliam never shoes us the common man's attitude towards Tuttle, only the government's.
zingzangspillip1 1 week ago
@zingzangspillip1 However, Tuttle is *not* a terrorist. He would only be labeled one by the Ministry, because he is defying their clumsy attempts to regulate the lives of their citizens. The only terror he creates is created by a proxy, the government.
zingzangspillip1 1 week ago
Loved that movie
morpheus2k2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh Jesus Christ, not another Alex Jones guy... you people are all over the Internet like shit. I cant even watch a video about this movie without having that stupid "Infowars.com" thrown in my face. Alex Jones is a complete lunatic.
jumpoutatree 1 year ago
Fantastic movie.
Lydioski 1 year ago
The best of it... Kate Bush song and voice...
alexssp001 2 years ago
No. Annie Lennox "Sex Crimes"
gocartergo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No. Annie Lennox "Sex Crimes"
gocartergo 1 year ago
Art holding a mirror up to society .... allowing to reflect on the question, what have we become?
SniffTheHedgehog 2 years ago
What we have always been.
LastCynicStanding 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."-- H.L. Mencken
neothomist1275 3 years ago
"1984" was ahead of this movie by decades
LLCoolPass 3 years ago
1984, the movie, was boring as hell. They removed every single thinking from the main character. Though maybe it is just that I loved the book so much ;)
manoo205 2 years ago
"thinking?"
also, why do i have thumnbs down. kind of sad, really.
LLCoolPass 2 years ago
sorry, I mean thoughts. As far I remember the movie was harder to follow than the book, and much more boring. It is just was I think.
manoo205 2 years ago
Way ahead of it's time (unfortunately).
underdriverz 3 years ago 6
visioneer!
agfigueroaa 3 years ago