ok IM SO SORRY THAT THEY NEVER TAUGHT ME HOW TO SPELL FELINY OR FELINE OR WHOEVER THE FUCK ITS SPELLED so stop bitching ok i apoligagized for my ignorance on how to spell it.
Well I wasn't referring to just one word. In general your entire use of the language is shocking which in response doesn't really give you the right to call me a "kid" since at least I can grasp the basics of the english language.
Ok im so sorry that i misspelled one word but quite frankly, I dont give a flying fuck! SO! You can go shove your spelleing teachers dick up your ass, you rude little prick of a person!
Maybe because most animals aren't buried. Most animals get killed by predators, or if they die of other natural causes they aren't buried but their carcass is out the open ready to be used as nutrients by other animals.
And the animals that get buried usually are dead pets. And people don't usually go digging to exhume the bodies of their dead pets, and that reduces the possibility of finding an incorrupt animal body.
There must still be a fundemental difference in the makeup of a body that decays and one that does not. Scientists do not appear to have found it though.
I have gotten a testimony so retarded that it has to be true several times. When is so dumb that no sentient human would even come up with a story lik that.
Those are actually usually true. In American news they most often take place in Florida.
"A 31 year old man was charged with forgery and counterfitting after he bought several cartons of cigarettes with a stolen check and tried to open a bank-account with a one million dollar bill"
If you say that a miracle is a "once in a billion" happening, then miracles would be all around you, depending on how you frame it. Whos to judge the signicance of every state of the universe?
Didn't Hume say that a claim should be disbelieved unless the negation of the claim is more miraculous than the claim itself?
That's why we take other things on testimony alone, since someone lying about something really arbitrary where they gain nothing from it is a little paranoid, more so than believing whatever you're being told.
how would they do that without attacking the arguments? what migkillertwo was putting forth was what he believed to be an argument for the existence of god, and tooltime9901 was attacking that argument.. what would you have them do instead?
Just out of curiousity Tooltime, has Migblocker blocked you? Just curious. I see it isnt posted as a response, but doesnt really matter, multiple explanations for that. Just curious, hes already blocked me for postin 5 or so comments on a video he made, and in every comment I refuted the claims. What is soooooooo very funny is the mere fact that it was the ONLY video I ever commented on. Very first video I comment on, and refute in comments and he blocks me and insults me. So very funny.
He blocked me. He tried to argue there was no evidence for Alexander the Great, when I sent him around 15 links to scholar sites and archaeology websites from university and similar institutes, he publicly bashed me claiming I never did, so I forwarded the message again, and he blocked me. He is a pussy. A lying pussy.
Iv heard hes blocked others not just me. I am actually proud of the fact that he blocked me, because it just shows how much of a liar he is, who couldn't give a fuck about truth. Ya, Alexander...we dont really know he existed, despite the historians who did in fact write about him, and other people wrote about him, in multiple different languages , and lets just ignore all the other evidence *sardonic* Fuck you. If your reading this, FUCK YOU!
"He tried to argue there was no evidence for Alexander the Great"
Did he really? When did this happen? I informed him about a year ago that he was screwing up the comparison to The Socratic Problem. He was using the wrong dead Greek.
It helps to know something about what you're referring to; otherwise instead of citing an obscure philosopher who left no writing you might mistakenly choose a guy who scattered physical evidence in stone across three fucking continents.
It was around March of 08, give or take. I proved him, I show him the evidence for ATG but he refused to accept I even showed it when my outbox shows that I did in fact send him around 20 links to scholar sites and archaeology sites specific to this topic. He is a fuckwit, and that is being nice. Then he turned around and used the bible to once again, prove the bible.
No argument, I was just wondering if he was the typical fuckwit who keeps using an argument after it's been proven wrong; or if he's the kind of fuckwit who will keep using the same argument after he's been shown to be using the wrong one and pointed at the correct one.
Some of these fuckwits you can't even be nice and help out. They're like insects with their behavior hardwired into their rudimentary nervous systems.
Yeah you pretty much hit the nail on the head there, but that is only from my experience with him. You just have to watch his Contra John L Armstrong videos to see how stubborn he really is, and he does use the same tiresome, rejected arguments over and over again.
Miracles are epidemically impossible. If it's not physically possible it's not real, if it's physically possible it's scientifically understandable, and thus not a miracle.
The truth is that I am from the future, the present me is only five years at this point in time.
I traveled back to save the world. But I can't tell you any details since it may cause an infinite loopback contradiction paradox. Just rest assured that the world is safe in my hands, all I need from you is all your money.
A miracle is an event that occurs outside of what we know today as natural laws? What did anyone in the bible know about "natural laws"? Nothing!
It's amazing how today's retards apply their limited understanding of their high school education, the one they received in the 21st century, and project it on to a 2000 year old cave dweller. Just fucking amazing.
I wonder, do you have any people, personally, that you'd believe, no matter what they say, based on who they are? I know one or two in my 'world' that , were they to say the sky was hot pink, I'd take it as a given. The logical argument can't always be made imo, because begging the question, etc, these fallacies, can and should be suspended depending on who is speaking, and to whom.
the thing is, with the right conditions it could be pink. it's still electromagnetic radiation of a very narrow bandwidth. theoretically i could make the sky look green from a person's perspective on earth.
if the comment was stupid enough, i would not believe anyone who told me it, until they gave me evidence.
miracles are no different than these people going on about their experiences of god or their feelings of him because they always say its hard to explain.ive never heard any testimonies from any theist.
There simply is no reason to believe in miracles! The only reason anyone even knows what a miricle is, is because they have an imagination and love to imagine "what if". So when what you imagine is outside the realm of natural laws it is called a miricle. EVERYTHING you have ever witnessed has been within the known natural laws. So until something is PROVEN to act outside those laws, no miricle accounts should be believed! Simply put, Its so extreemly unlikely that they do occur at all.
It would if you were speaking truth. Your stating opinion. Conjecture, at best. Science cannot and has not explained many things. Miricles could exsist. They could also exsist. The problem is that proving a negative is, simply put, impossible. One of the few true impossibilities in the universe.
You cant read? I said nothing of miricles being impossible, just that there is no reason to ever believe that they do. What I said"Simply put, Its so extreemly unlikely that they do occur at all. " I guess it wasnt simply enough put for you.
So if a small creek that for no apparent reason rose up and flooded a town you wouldn't see that as a miracle? Keep in mind a miracle doesn't have to be something positive just outside the laws of chance.
no. It would just be a flood. Just because we don't know why it happened, doesn't mean its a miracle. Thats the main flaw of superstition. A miracle is like magic, both don't exist and are just a way for us to classify the unknown.
Its not a miricle if I throw snake eyes 9 times in a row with a set of perfectly balanced dice but its outside the laws of chance. RULE 1. things of very little chance do occur. RULE 2. things of zero chance do not. Now when you break RULE 2. you will have a miricle.
The problem is this: How could you possibly determine/claim that some occurrence was a miracle vs. something that was just really unlikely to happen and seems to suspend the laws of physics, but might have a valid explanation of which you're simply unaware? What IS a miracle? What qualifies?
Even if you give an example like the moon's craters spontaneously rearranging themselves to form the face of Alan Rickman and call that enough, when has anything even nearly that odd/unlikely occurred?
There's no difference between someone telling you about a miracle and you witnessing one first hand. In both cases, it's infinitely more likely that you were hallucinating (or that the informant is mistaken) than that a miracle--which is, by definition, impossible--has occurred.
If you loosen "miracle" to mean "the incredibly unlikely", it becomes meaningless. The prob. of me seeing the 10 license plates I saw on the way to school today is 3*10^-72. Nevertheless, it happened.
The Doctor Who quote made me laugh.
Zombie1990 1 year ago
Where the fuck do you get a MiG-21 Fishbed fighter lol
odenskrigare 2 years ago
He even knicked a video naming convention from Confederal Socialist.
kff 2 years ago
great points.
plus i loved the Doctor Who reference. if i was a lesser person id say you were the smartest person alive just for that. lol
MaNiAcaLunchBox 2 years ago
If you define miracles as supernatural events, then they are impossible by definition.
tpsisokayiguess 2 years ago
aah, tooltime, you watch doctor who! yay!
proftobes 2 years ago
i believe in miracles, it a miracle if i ever get laid!
1GOD1JESUS 2 years ago
you dont need a miracle to get laid just get a prostitute XD
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Knowing his luck it would be a whore with the stage name 'Miracle'
kff 2 years ago
thats....awsome
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Interesting.
Chuloloc 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can get you a missile if you are interested...
bfl3tcher 2 years ago
Despite the dictionary laziness the word is spelled as felony.
Riphel 2 years ago
yeah i know i spelled it wrong but i couldnt remeber how to spell it and i was to lazy to pick up a dictionary so fuck it huh? ^^
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Or learn basic english.
GonzoZodiac 2 years ago
ok IM SO SORRY THAT THEY NEVER TAUGHT ME HOW TO SPELL FELINY OR FELINE OR WHOEVER THE FUCK ITS SPELLED so stop bitching ok i apoligagized for my ignorance on how to spell it.
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Not just that.... you're generally terrible at most the language.
GonzoZodiac 2 years ago
jesus christ kid just stop i spelled one word wrong and im tired of your bitching
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Well I wasn't referring to just one word. In general your entire use of the language is shocking which in response doesn't really give you the right to call me a "kid" since at least I can grasp the basics of the english language.
GonzoZodiac 2 years ago
Ok im so sorry that i misspelled one word but quite frankly, I dont give a flying fuck! SO! You can go shove your spelleing teachers dick up your ass, you rude little prick of a person!
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Well it's more so grammar but you are still spelling words incorrect here. It's quite sad when I witness someone as inane as you.
GonzoZodiac 2 years ago
ha...HAHAHHAHA YOU SPELLED INSANE WRONG YOU STUPID FUCK!
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
Seriously go back to school you're fucking retarded. Inane is a word. Look it up... wait you're too retarded I'll do it for you.
Main Entry: 1inane
Pronunciation: \i-ˈnān\
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): inan·er; inan·est
Etymology: Latin inanis
Date: 1662
1 : empty, insubstantial
2 : lacking significance, meaning,
Go back to school kid.
GonzoZodiac 2 years ago 3
"ohh that would be a feline!" srry if i didnt spell it right but that was hallarious
TheBoogeyman000 2 years ago
You Tube search. "Incorrupt body st bernadette", if you want to see what is claimed to be a miracle.
Something that goes against the laws of science.
stevepalmerssolid 2 years ago
Or rather, something that doesn't seem to fit into our current understanding of the degradation of bodies after death.
badboyfrvr 2 years ago
Well we never seem to find an animals body that is incorrupt.
stevepalmerssolid 2 years ago
Maybe because most animals aren't buried. Most animals get killed by predators, or if they die of other natural causes they aren't buried but their carcass is out the open ready to be used as nutrients by other animals.
And the animals that get buried usually are dead pets. And people don't usually go digging to exhume the bodies of their dead pets, and that reduces the possibility of finding an incorrupt animal body.
badboyfrvr 2 years ago
There must still be a fundemental difference in the makeup of a body that decays and one that does not. Scientists do not appear to have found it though.
stevepalmerssolid 2 years ago
Got to love a good Christian straw man attack ;o)
Good job on setting it straight.
myintellectualjourny 2 years ago
I disagree with you, even when you saw it with your own eyes its more likely to be hallucinating.
theathiestguy 2 years ago
like you said: if our understanding of science hasn't defined a 'miracle' yet, it still isn't a miracle.
it's just something of which we don't know why or how it happened YET.
therefore, miracles can not exist unless the definition of a miracle is: everything you don't know why/how it happened.
TheCakeAintNoLie 2 years ago
Exactly true. Just as a sunrise used to be a "miracle".
Aaberg123 2 years ago
Dr Who makes more sense then miracles in the Bible.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago 2
have you heard about catholic incorruptibles? what do you think?
jfeuiebf 2 years ago
I have gotten a testimony so retarded that it has to be true several times. When is so dumb that no sentient human would even come up with a story lik that.
Those are actually usually true. In American news they most often take place in Florida.
Those miracles I generally tend to believe in.
CognosSquare 2 years ago
I thought a miracle was an event contrary to the laws of nature and attributed to a supernatural cause?
When has that ever happend?
blackchimp99 2 years ago
Really what kind of miracles, please explain yourself. As I am already sitting on the edge of my chair ready to laugh.
NathanWubs 2 years ago
Stuff like this:
"A 31 year old man was charged with forgery and counterfitting after he bought several cartons of cigarettes with a stolen check and tried to open a bank-account with a one million dollar bill"
CognosSquare 2 years ago
CognosSquare - That's not a miracle, that's just an unfortunate event for the convicted.
themanwhoknew 2 years ago
It is a miracle if anyone said dude noone will ever do all this crazy ass shit [above story].
Then from nowhere jumps out a 31 year old floridian who does it all exactly as described.
Dude! that would totally be a miracle.
CognosSquare 2 years ago
Not a miracle sorry.
NathanWubs 2 years ago
If you say that a miracle is a "once in a billion" happening, then miracles would be all around you, depending on how you frame it. Whos to judge the signicance of every state of the universe?
CognosSquare 2 years ago
why would you call yourself Mig Killer?!
KaptajnKaffe 2 years ago
David Hume FTW!!!
maidenfucknrulz666 2 years ago
"......well, Timelord technology....."
ReverendAtomSmasher 2 years ago
Didn't Hume say that a claim should be disbelieved unless the negation of the claim is more miraculous than the claim itself?
That's why we take other things on testimony alone, since someone lying about something really arbitrary where they gain nothing from it is a little paranoid, more so than believing whatever you're being told.
ScepticalAgnostic 2 years ago
i dont understand. doesnt tooltime not believe in god? why is he even arguing about miracles if he knows there is no god
xSubliminaLx 2 years ago
He's just being intellectually honest ;)
rationalargument 2 years ago
hes arguing about miracles because supposedly miracles prove the existance of god. and he is arguing that they DONT... duh
Ilikenuman 2 years ago
yeah but why not just argue about the existence of god rather?
xSubliminaLx 2 years ago
@xSubliminaLx
how would they do that without attacking the arguments? what migkillertwo was putting forth was what he believed to be an argument for the existence of god, and tooltime9901 was attacking that argument.. what would you have them do instead?
Ilikenuman 2 years ago
i dont know it just seems like a waste of time to me. i guess your right?
xSubliminaLx 2 years ago
in case no one let you know yet, you misspelled migkillertwo, just trying to be helpful.
TrexXanChen 2 years ago
*in the video title, i meant to say
TrexXanChen 2 years ago
FELON! and you almost said it without laughing. So who's your new arch-nemesis then?
It's well know that eye witness testimony is the least reliable of all evidence presented, due to personal perception and human memory.
ICheruBI 2 years ago
Hey fancy meeting you here my dear. I just watched your"Know Thyself" music vid 7 times and will likely come back for more.
LuciousVBogeymanProd 2 years ago
Just out of curiousity Tooltime, has Migblocker blocked you? Just curious. I see it isnt posted as a response, but doesnt really matter, multiple explanations for that. Just curious, hes already blocked me for postin 5 or so comments on a video he made, and in every comment I refuted the claims. What is soooooooo very funny is the mere fact that it was the ONLY video I ever commented on. Very first video I comment on, and refute in comments and he blocks me and insults me. So very funny.
jay666KJ 2 years ago
He blocked me. He tried to argue there was no evidence for Alexander the Great, when I sent him around 15 links to scholar sites and archaeology websites from university and similar institutes, he publicly bashed me claiming I never did, so I forwarded the message again, and he blocked me. He is a pussy. A lying pussy.
chuckawobbly 2 years ago
Iv heard hes blocked others not just me. I am actually proud of the fact that he blocked me, because it just shows how much of a liar he is, who couldn't give a fuck about truth. Ya, Alexander...we dont really know he existed, despite the historians who did in fact write about him, and other people wrote about him, in multiple different languages , and lets just ignore all the other evidence *sardonic* Fuck you. If your reading this, FUCK YOU!
jay666KJ 2 years ago
well fuck you too!
philateliceun 2 years ago
"He tried to argue there was no evidence for Alexander the Great"
Did he really? When did this happen? I informed him about a year ago that he was screwing up the comparison to The Socratic Problem. He was using the wrong dead Greek.
It helps to know something about what you're referring to; otherwise instead of citing an obscure philosopher who left no writing you might mistakenly choose a guy who scattered physical evidence in stone across three fucking continents.
IsaacBickerstaffEsq 2 years ago
It was around March of 08, give or take. I proved him, I show him the evidence for ATG but he refused to accept I even showed it when my outbox shows that I did in fact send him around 20 links to scholar sites and archaeology sites specific to this topic. He is a fuckwit, and that is being nice. Then he turned around and used the bible to once again, prove the bible.
chuckawobbly 2 years ago
"He is a fuckwit"
No argument, I was just wondering if he was the typical fuckwit who keeps using an argument after it's been proven wrong; or if he's the kind of fuckwit who will keep using the same argument after he's been shown to be using the wrong one and pointed at the correct one.
Some of these fuckwits you can't even be nice and help out. They're like insects with their behavior hardwired into their rudimentary nervous systems.
IsaacBickerstaffEsq 2 years ago
Yeah you pretty much hit the nail on the head there, but that is only from my experience with him. You just have to watch his Contra John L Armstrong videos to see how stubborn he really is, and he does use the same tiresome, rejected arguments over and over again.
chuckawobbly 2 years ago
Some probability of a miracle? Miracles aren't a natural occurrence there for can't be a subjected to probability.
zgbrotherhood 2 years ago
Miracles are epidemically impossible. If it's not physically possible it's not real, if it's physically possible it's scientifically understandable, and thus not a miracle.
Mastikator 2 years ago 2
there is so much wrong with what you've said I think you may be a five year old in disguise.
TheAtomicSkull 2 years ago
You found me out!
The truth is that I am from the future, the present me is only five years at this point in time.
I traveled back to save the world. But I can't tell you any details since it may cause an infinite loopback contradiction paradox. Just rest assured that the world is safe in my hands, all I need from you is all your money.
Mastikator 2 years ago
you stuck 5 years in a point in time?
jfeuiebf 2 years ago
what's your bank account? i need it to send you all my moneyzz ;D
you can trust me, I'm from the internet.
TheCakeAintNoLie 2 years ago 8
lmao
coolbeens21 2 years ago
A miracle is an event that occurs outside of what we know today as natural laws? What did anyone in the bible know about "natural laws"? Nothing!
It's amazing how today's retards apply their limited understanding of their high school education, the one they received in the 21st century, and project it on to a 2000 year old cave dweller. Just fucking amazing.
FallenAngel0fDoom 2 years ago 2
I wonder, do you have any people, personally, that you'd believe, no matter what they say, based on who they are? I know one or two in my 'world' that , were they to say the sky was hot pink, I'd take it as a given. The logical argument can't always be made imo, because begging the question, etc, these fallacies, can and should be suspended depending on who is speaking, and to whom.
TheAtomicSkull 2 years ago
You would actually believe someone if they said the sky is pink?
joshcena33 2 years ago
the thing is, with the right conditions it could be pink. it's still electromagnetic radiation of a very narrow bandwidth. theoretically i could make the sky look green from a person's perspective on earth.
if the comment was stupid enough, i would not believe anyone who told me it, until they gave me evidence.
bignastydragon 2 years ago
Nope.
Kieranfoy 2 years ago
doctor who reference ftw!
fffjjjnnn 2 years ago
What is this "police box" that you mention?
ColtonPhillips 2 years ago
the TARDIS!!!
tooltime9901 2 years ago
Great video.
I have a natural tendency to be wary of ignoring testimony, but in this case.......
SirPwn4lot 2 years ago
miracles are no different than these people going on about their experiences of god or their feelings of him because they always say its hard to explain.ive never heard any testimonies from any theist.
another bullshit claim,all it is.
childbirth?no miracle,pay attention is ex ed.
TLSlayer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cut you hair
fishbone937 2 years ago
why,whats wrong with it?
TLSlayer 2 years ago
That would be a kick ass intro
6inches2theleft 2 years ago
If you saw a miracle with your own eyes, wouldn't you also need to know that it was caused by a God for it to be a miracle?
Sheogorath13 2 years ago
Well done Tooltime.
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
I deceived my girlfriend in some fashion, i said it went in that hole by accident but as now its in there it might as well stay till im done.
myjizzureye 2 years ago 2
I guess you should also ask Tooltime why Migtard categorically rejects the miracles of the Quran?
Godshoulddie 2 years ago 2
There simply is no reason to believe in miracles! The only reason anyone even knows what a miricle is, is because they have an imagination and love to imagine "what if". So when what you imagine is outside the realm of natural laws it is called a miricle. EVERYTHING you have ever witnessed has been within the known natural laws. So until something is PROVEN to act outside those laws, no miricle accounts should be believed! Simply put, Its so extreemly unlikely that they do occur at all.
religionOFFENDSme 2 years ago
typing in caps doesn't make you right
TheAtomicSkull 2 years ago
But how about speaking the truth? Does that make me right?
religionOFFENDSme 2 years ago
It would if you were speaking truth. Your stating opinion. Conjecture, at best. Science cannot and has not explained many things. Miricles could exsist. They could also exsist. The problem is that proving a negative is, simply put, impossible. One of the few true impossibilities in the universe.
TheAtomicSkull 2 years ago
You cant read? I said nothing of miricles being impossible, just that there is no reason to ever believe that they do. What I said"Simply put, Its so extreemly unlikely that they do occur at all. " I guess it wasnt simply enough put for you.
religionOFFENDSme 2 years ago
Lol at title & intro.
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
"indeterminate probability" is a good term I think. You can't calculate the probability of something which has never been confirmed to happen.
AbbeyNormal 2 years ago 2
I have to make him that intro now...
Sorry.
SaintJimmyI 2 years ago
Simply put the consistency of nature surpasses the testimony of any man.
smpunditz 2 years ago 4
"Oh, that'd be a felony."
lol
ProfMTH 2 years ago
lol, "but oh, that would've been a felony!".
No worries, they just put those laws there to stop all of the lame people from doing it.
HighZombiesRule 2 years ago
I'm glad you backed off from saying they are impossible... What the fuck do we know about anything...?
RodHullIOnceWasHim 2 years ago
impossible would be the wrong way to put it. having 0 probability would be better.
tooltime9901 2 years ago
I'd really like to understand what the difference is there...?
RodHullIOnceWasHim 2 years ago
Probable does not mean possible.
notbill9465 2 years ago
So if a small creek that for no apparent reason rose up and flooded a town you wouldn't see that as a miracle? Keep in mind a miracle doesn't have to be something positive just outside the laws of chance.
Agamum 2 years ago
no. It would just be a flood. Just because we don't know why it happened, doesn't mean its a miracle. Thats the main flaw of superstition. A miracle is like magic, both don't exist and are just a way for us to classify the unknown.
Sav3TheWorld 2 years ago
Its not a miricle if I throw snake eyes 9 times in a row with a set of perfectly balanced dice but its outside the laws of chance. RULE 1. things of very little chance do occur. RULE 2. things of zero chance do not. Now when you break RULE 2. you will have a miricle.
religionOFFENDSme 2 years ago
Thats a fair law.
Charlymaumushi 2 years ago
The problem is this: How could you possibly determine/claim that some occurrence was a miracle vs. something that was just really unlikely to happen and seems to suspend the laws of physics, but might have a valid explanation of which you're simply unaware? What IS a miracle? What qualifies?
Even if you give an example like the moon's craters spontaneously rearranging themselves to form the face of Alan Rickman and call that enough, when has anything even nearly that odd/unlikely occurred?
GBart 2 years ago
There's no difference between someone telling you about a miracle and you witnessing one first hand. In both cases, it's infinitely more likely that you were hallucinating (or that the informant is mistaken) than that a miracle--which is, by definition, impossible--has occurred.
If you loosen "miracle" to mean "the incredibly unlikely", it becomes meaningless. The prob. of me seeing the 10 license plates I saw on the way to school today is 3*10^-72. Nevertheless, it happened.
Bueller007 2 years ago
my sister is a felony
WKaliberr 2 years ago 2
I think "indeterminate probability" (and hence "not even probable") is indeed the best way to describe miracles.
CousinoMacul 2 years ago 6
Comment removed
boburanus69 2 years ago
<3 Hume!
That guy wrote some miraculous material.
comradepinko 2 years ago
Oh man, miglet is your nemesis? That's shooting at the low hanging fruit.
Keippernicus 2 years ago 5
It's all relative. Are there anyone better?
Aaberg123 2 years ago
hmmm dude u are seth rogens voice trapped inside a hippie
IronMaidenGypsy 2 years ago 5
lol
McComment 2 years ago
you are very well spoken. How old are you?
Razile18 2 years ago 4
25 according to his channel.
comradepinko 2 years ago