Added: 4 years ago
From: mauro00013
Views: 47,307
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (593)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • One is the mom the other one the the baby

  • @soccerjonesy Your the idiot that's a satellite the the satellite falls in the ocean sinks and lands on the monster and wake him up. JJ Abrams said that the monster us native to earth it's not an alien

  • @20ftTurd A satellite

  • @gamerboykyle1 It's one monster JJ Abrams said that they just had persective issues

  • @TheSamdog911 You can shove what you think up your arse because there is only one monster in that movie there us no whale monster there us only the main monster which is an animal not an alien it's native to earth and it was asleep and a satellite woke the monster attacked and in the poster it said someTHING Has found us someTHINGS

  • y el qe tiene 2 cabezas??para mi qe hay uno al principio...fijate...

  • ok. the monsters tail seemed small when we saw it at the park but when we saw it on the bridge, it's giant. personally, i think it could have been mummy or daddy monster that broke the bridge. we will find out in the second film

  • @gamerboykyle1 One monster. A baby.

  • they said the monster was here already and that a comet woke it up

  • @20ftTurd Satellite, not a comet.

  • I have to admit that the creature in the park looks nothing like the "Bat" looking one in the city streets.

  • @willdewit1971 i agree.

  • @willdewit1971 It unhinges it's jaw, that's why it looks different.

  • Let's see...

    1. Clover's Tail

    2. Clover

    3. Also Clover

  • FAKE!!!

  • Interesting theory, but alternatively...

    Maybe the monster can shapeshift?????

  • @Nascarboy426 No.

  • the first one isnt like a snake dude that was its tail that swipped at the bridge and broke it

  • when clover is attacking the city later on in the film and takes out the chopper it strongly resembles a cobra. the one that eats the funnyman seems so small in comparrison and looks very different imh. i hope there are two but i have a feeling its just inconsistancy, i love this movie and hope they make a2nd. they have plenty to work with after such an open ending and the lil paracytes are still roaming i imagine.

  • i thought there was two becuase of the diffrence in size between the one who smashed the bridge, and the one who toar up the city but they are the same monster there just isent anything besides the bridge to scale it two so it look biger in the city people scale it to the buldings witch makes it look huge. but the seen when it eats hud it looks smaller witch i dont know why that is. But the directer and producer said there is only one monster in this movie.

  • I'm just wondering... If this is the baby, and it's parents are somewhere else. And it arived to earth from space as we've seen. How do you expect 2 monster parents to navigate through space to earth to save it's baby? Not gonna happen, glad this was the only cloverfield. Seeing how dumb this was though, maybe the director and screenwriters might create a pilotable asteroid for the parents to use... -.-

  • @soccerjonesy IS A PREISTORIC MONSTER NOT A ALIEN......................noo­b

  • @DeatxstrokeBlade It's an alien dumbass, rewatch the movie. It shows the thing landing in the ocean from space at the very end. The director even said so. Also, who the hell uses noob for comments? That's for games smartass.

  • @soccerjonesy you noob the director say it the thing at the end was a satelit that smash clover face and he wake up if hi is a alien im a space ship why he is without clothes aaa AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA hake mate

  • okay im fucking done searching to squeeze every single little detail out of this fkn movie! IVE HAD ENOUGH LEAVE ME ALONE

  • There only one damn monster. This video just show different views of it, but it's the same one.....

  • allright anyone who says theres more than one fucking monster is stupid as shit or hasnt seen the movie in theaters. I own it and have watched the special features THERES ONLY ONE MONSTER, they show drawings and 3d images of it multiple times and not once do they ever reffer to a second monster. And no there was no sattelite falling from the sky. its fucking space shit doesnt fall there. Theres no gravity. And a sattelitle would burn up on reentry even if it did.

  • There is only one monster

  • theres also a whale thing, which actully takes out the bridge with one of its fins, and it ripps off the statue of liberty's head.

    

  • There are two monsters. The one in the ocean the used it's tail to destroy the bridge. The one that you see multiple times is another. The first monster has a flat tail. The second one has a more rounded blunt tail.

  • Are u a fucking idiot?!?!?! there all the same monster u moron!!!! The so called first is the monsters tail!!! THERE'S ONLY ONE MONSTER!!!! The movie staff nicknamed the 'only' monster "clover" there's only one retard!!!!!!!!!!!

  • there's one monster it just got some teeth knocked out and the bridge part the monster had a hard on and hit the bridge with it duh

  • blah there's only one monster and thats the baby :)

  • i think the one that ate the camara men is the baby while the giant one attacking the city is the mother but im sure there were many other babies running around so im pretty sure there are many monsters.

    

  • well i will just go ahead and take the word of the people who made the movies words for it. one monster.

  • There is 2 giant monsters in this movie. A mom and a baby. The baby kills people, the mom doesnt because she is looking 4 her baby.

  • There were actually 2 monsters in this film. The monster at the end which eats the cameraman is the parent. The monster you see before the group head ito the subway is the baby. There are differences.

  • @The1979Warriors .... i think the monster who is killing hud, are the baby, because hes loking "young"

    and the first one is the mother

  • @Wrenchcool all shall be revealed in the sequel lmao!!!

  • it not a octupos, its the tail you idiot

  • he puts it in spanish?

  • Did LSD kill JFK? Google The Daylight Test.

  • There were many monsters in Cloverfield. 1 big one and all them small ones that fell off it. The thing on the bridge was the big ones tail.

  • 1:07 i though leg was his penis

  • I thought that was clover's tail. Are you sure that's an octopus monster?

  • dude u can see they the same on the bridge it was the tail and on the other u can really see they look smimiliar

  • For fuck sake why is everyone getting so hung up on the ten monster assumptions on cloverfield

    Its a film

    let us all have opinions without putting one another down and trying to be miss/mr know it alls here

  • okay did anybody else see that in monster 2 obviosly at the beginning frame theres a tail but once hud turns a little the monster is totally flipped around at 0:23 tail 0:29 other monster

  • i think all these differences are coming from mistakes and incoherence, so there must be only one monster.

    But who care :) this film is great ;)

  • how come all toy hippos are blue or purple. but real hippos are brown

  • @burnticeblues because the toy hippos are made in china! and chinese people don't really know what hippos look like!

  • The monster that eats Hud has red eyes, yet the 'first' one has black ones, even the official toy thing has the black eyes so lighting can't be an excuse.

  • 57 when they bombed the monster that was fing epic

  • @ciclesirjr Totally was..=]

  • i think the "octopus" is just its leg who knows it could tense up if its out of the water because it needs to keep up right

  • lol octopus, this guy is retarded. and 4 monsters, lol

  • No genius -___- The "Octopus" Appears to be the tail...

  • Uh, sorry to break it to everyone, but there is only ONE giant monster in that movie. Yes, it looks different in like, every scene, but that's just cause of the place the characters were in at the time, the time of day, CGI mishaps in size scale, etc.

    There is one monster. Personally, I CANNOT wait to see if the mother/father shows up if that's the child. Can you imagine how HUGE that thing would be? Freaks me out to think about it.

  • @iisl33t Sorry to break it to you but there ARE more than 1 monsters.The whale the main one,and the spiders

  • the thing thats wierd is the tale that smashes the bridge looks WAY bigger then the actual monsters tale

  • I think the "Octopus" is it's tail

  • 4th is the baby 2nd and 3rd are the same and the first is either just its tail or the supposed"whale version"

  • Best movie ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @skizmsucks23 i know!!!!!!!!!

  • Dude, the only reason why you think that there are 4 monsters is because you just showed every time in the movie where you see the monster... in the bridge scene, the "tenticle" is not a tenticle, its the monster's tail. and in the other scene. the 2nd monster it doesent have hoofs... those are just the monster's hands on its chest. it looks like hoofs because the hands are griping into a fist. the reason why there are different teeth and that the brain is bigger is just the angle!

  • kkkkkkkkk rec.

  • There wasn't 3 monster, there only was 3 bad CGI techniques for one creature.

  • its only 1.....the way that it looked soo different is cause it prob transform......or maybe it transform because it got weaker but idk but im soo sure its only 1 monster

  • First is its tail, 2nd and 3rd are the same, and the 4th is the only baby.

  • the first is its tail

  • I NO SPANISH NOW :DDDDDD

  • looooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooool

  • gogtjgog has right ther is 1 monster

    1st: it is the tail of the monster(do you have the dvd look at the featurettes!!)

    2nd: you can´t look!! a horse!!!!!

    3rt and 4th: its the same monster but another perpektive

  • If the first one was a cephalopod kaiju, he could be Viras or Gezora.

  • you are right but there are 2 monsters at the bridge scene the first one breaks the bridge the second is on top of it

  • no. There is not. It is one monster. I saw the movie. All of those features... are ONE monster. Just lettin' You know...

  • Actually, JJ Abrams said there are two monsters, so 2. (if you dont belive me, just watch that fucking bonuses on DVD)

  • yes two monstors are the big monster and the parasites

  • lol,..theres only 2 monsters n this movie,...the person who made this vid thought EVRY seen with a monster n it showed a difrent monster,..but its jus a realy ODD looking creature

  • yh brandon is right and if there were 4 monsters it should be in the news in cloverfield theres only 1

  • all the clips are from the same monster

  • only one monster, the only diffrent monsters there is the parasites,

  • You freak!!!.... the the first pic its the monster tail!!... the second and third are the same legs.. get some glasses and the last one is the entire monster my god!!

  • I think is the same monster that is just growing up fast as hell

  • its not like an octopus its its tail ther is only 2

  • actually theres only 1

  • what was the last thing ??

  • i think its called "Parasite"

  • Clover doesn't have a tail. And guys, dudes, guys dudes. They're running away from something, that's why they're on the bridge. Now the monster's tail doesn't go around the city, into the water, and smash the bridge. I doubt it even has a tail.

  • tail is probably clovers tail

  • I am correcting myself. There is 1 monster only. There's a video of word from the director of this movie that it's one monster only.

  • the whole point the baby was attacking is kuz it was shreiking and like ppl tought it was trying to do harm but really it waz calling its mom i dont remember wat part but a satelite fell somwhere and it woke up the mom

  • i agree with myuzernamerulez kuz the mom has 2 pairs of extra hands in the stomch area and the baby only has 1 pair but theres 2 more 1st the little ones that look like big spiders and 2nd the whale looking thing that kills jason

  • There are two monsters but you are missing the most obvious point. Those appendages on the monsters stomach. The 1st monster has 2 pairs of those, just look at the part where they are watching it on the news. The 2nd monster that eats Hud only has one pair. That is proof you cannot deny, there is more than one monster. Look if you don't believe me.

  • Theres a possible 2. Not3 but 2 monsters

  • yeah, the 'Octopus' was its tail, there are 2

  • notice how its all different lighting and u cant see the faces the same of the monster in each shot. and also the bridge was attacked by something in the water and in the last shot at the end the monster had gill like flaps on the side of its head. coincidence?

  • there is only one monster. there MAYBE 2 but no more than 2. They need to make a sequel or a prequel. the prequel showing how it all happened. and the sequel is just like any other movie and not like the 1st one and its from the armys POV. or the sequel could be from the guys point of view that was recording with his cell phone on the bridge. or it could be from another city?

  • And another thing Did they kill the monster with all those bombs? If they did that means there is another monster sorry for the dought.

  • Dude the thing that destroyed the bridge was the F-ing tail the tail loos somewhat like a tentacle. Wait Sandeach just got it The 2nd monster could be the mom that the infant Clover could be looking for. Ha Any one agree?

  • Could be

  • this is it, jj mathafuckin abrams said his goddamn self that there isONE, no you dont understand, ONE, OK, ONE fuckin monster ok, ONE MONSTER, i will repeat it again for the retards and dumbasses that still believe, there is ONE MONSTER, ok the dude who produced the movie said there is ONE MONSTER so please do people like me, realrs555 and imawhore499 and other smart people a favor and SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT MORE THAN ONE MONSTER

  • okay let's see from JJ's perspective for a second if you were going to make a second movie would you be going around telling everyone the plot for the next movie hell secrecy and the unknown was the main selling point for the first movie and it will be that way for the second movie IF HE MAKES ONE I know that if I were in his shoes I would lie my ass off about a SECOND MONSTER

  • the first shot was from its tail

  • thank you, know one belived me

  • why the hell would you say know instead of no

  • those r all just shots of the same monster...

  • LITSEN UP PEOPLE!!!

    You all have been brainwashed.

    The whole ide behind movies like this is about secrets... "secrets with no answers". And these secrets leads to theorys... theorys that we come up with becuse we want to belive that there are more secrets.

    And suddenly some guy says: Hey there are more then one monster, then a second say the same and then a third one, then another, another and another and so on... And after a while... Everyone belives there are more then one monster!!!

  • I believe in the theory of three monsters. 2 parents and a baby monster.

  • There are 2 monsters

    When the bridge goes down you can see the big tail and the monster who goes around the city eating people don't have so big tail so.. but that what i think so :3

  • nope just one baby and parasites

  • ignore the stupid annoying comments, there are proofs that it's not only 1 monster, and if it bothers you that mcuh that people say the same thing over and over again, disable the comments, as simple as that (if you need help, there are tutorials, or you can msg me :p)

  • stfu all there is 5 monsters the tail that killed jason was a whale like monster so in the sequel there is an invasion

  • i do agree there is more than one but the "1st" was its tail, and the "3rd" looked a lot like the second i think theres only 2, the 2nd and 4th

  • on em0nster

    is enoguh

  • 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the same monster. the first is the monster's tail.

  • its not an octopus its a cable from the bridge but there are rumors of two monsters i cant wait for the second its about how this monster is a baby and the mother comes in for the 2nd

  • ok what i know is the monster is a "baby" becuase JJ Abrams said himself it was also the first scene is the monsters tail breakin the bridge not a tentacle from and octopuss

    anyway awesome movie

  • 0:09  PwNeD

  • They simply were inconsistent with the scale of the monster. They fucked up, or made a lame attempt at ambiguity. The U.S. Godzilla remake had all kinds of scale issues as well.

  • YES SOME ONE AGREES WITH ME!!!!

  • first of all the thing that smashed the bridge was its tail. Second: the 'horse legs' are the same monster's small arms which are curled up in a way that it looks like a horse leg.(1 of 2 which are underneath its two larger arms)

  • i agree one monster

  • Same monster. get over it.

  • that was its tail that broke the bridge dumb ass...

  • your english is really bad

  • do people STILL talk about more monsters? it's been out for over a fucking year, get over yourselves...it's been officially announced that there was just one monster. but shit, who am I to tell people what to do? knock yourselves out.

  • ok?

  • ok ur face

  • ......youtube exploring asshole

  • I explored your mom.

  • Comment removed

  • its the same damn monster the whole film, JJ Abrams has even said this, you conspiracy nuts need to put this to bed now.

  • lol I don't even know why you guys care, I mean it's just a movie

  • possible shape shifter =p

  • no, I think theres 3 now, the one that eats ben looks like the 1 that has 'horse legs.

  • that is no brain it is it's lungs

  • i love that type of alien

  • dont think of me as an ass, but actually if you pay attention to most of this kinda of crap its actually a supposed extinct species the military knew about them I guess and destroyed all eggs but one and the heat from a japanese satellite caused it to hatch. odd isnt it?

  • @mtndew6911 huh? it didnt hatch and i dont even think the military knew what it was! i saw the movie 3 times!!

  • @lilking1453 I saw the movie three times too, but actually the group sent to collect the satellite I'm pretty sure they were killed by the monster or the parasites.

  • opps i forgot the satellite crashed into the ocean and the egg was at the bottom of some deep trench

    HUD WAS RIGHT! :D

  • wtf? the legs of 2 and 3 are EXACTLY the same!

    and 1 is only it's tail... have you ever minded that you almost never see the whole monster? number 4 is a little different though, that's what i thought myself while watching it, but maybe it is because it got hit by all those bombs some time before that scene, or maybe it is because you never see it in such great detail anywhere else in the movie

  • well I only say the head in broad daylight at the end....that makes a huge difference when its not moving and just staring at you

  • same shiit

  • different day.

  • there all the same lol the bridge was hit by its tail most of the movie its destroying things with its tail and the other 3 all show that he has long legs with a tail just from a different angle lol but the baby ones in the subway there different

  • 3rd one still has that same tail AND the horse legs you were talking about....so your video in itself shows that its the same monster, just from different angles thanks

  • The diffrentece is the angle and it's state of power remember it was fighting the bombs and guns and tanks so...

  • there is five that i know couse of the subway spiders

  • its true there are atleast 2 monsters cuz there are different facial features on the ones showed. the loegs really dont matter i guess but other than that :\ no comments lol

  • in the scenes they referred to the monster as IT, i never heard them say THEM. If they wanted two monsters in the movie they would have made it clear there were two. they wouldn't dick around that much

  • lol few "teets"

  • get over it there is only 1 its just the lighting and the camera angles

  • there r 2 if u watch where the tale hits the road or bridge and right behind it the other bridge falls and the helicopters lights go up from tht a little bit and it looks like something nocked it down

  • It was the tail. >.>

  • there's only 1 monster maybe 2...you may need to compare the monster on 0:42 with the one on 1:13...their faces are different

  • Umh.. no. They looked the same. And WHY would they take the time to animate 2 different models of the monster? >.>

  • the first one is like an octopus? are you sure the octopus thing isnt that tail you can see in your second monster clip?

  • I didn't say it was an octopus thing. I said it was a tail.

  • not you...whn I quote someone it never goes tot he right person sorry

  • ok lol

  • omg, there is ONLY one monster in this movie...

  • the bridge was hit by a creatures tail

  • Angleofdeath is spot on.. loved this movie but u are so full of swine flu is untrue!

  • omggg stop saying he forgot one! or more...he doesnt try to show you the exact number, he is saying there are more than 2!!!

  • THERE IS 2 NOT 20 2

  • there is a satellite at the end of the movie that falls out of the sky so it came form outter space or i dont know

  • ok one there is only one monster it has a big long tail frog like hands and 2 front arms like gorilla ones and it has been sleeping in new york for about 10 000 years and it is a baby

  • not to burst your bubbles, but their all the same

  • are u eff n me all the monsters are the same

    he has a tail first of all

  • Just wait till the next movie, then you will all find out and the monsters in the movie are only babies so when there adults they will be really really really big like MASSIVE, the director said that on a video on youtube, search it.

  • you forgot one, its