@soccerjonesy Your the idiot that's a satellite the the satellite falls in the ocean sinks and lands on the monster and wake him up. JJ Abrams said that the monster us native to earth it's not an alien
@TheSamdog911 You can shove what you think up your arse because there is only one monster in that movie there us no whale monster there us only the main monster which is an animal not an alien it's native to earth and it was asleep and a satellite woke the monster attacked and in the poster it said someTHING Has found us someTHINGS
ok. the monsters tail seemed small when we saw it at the park but when we saw it on the bridge, it's giant. personally, i think it could have been mummy or daddy monster that broke the bridge. we will find out in the second film
when clover is attacking the city later on in the film and takes out the chopper it strongly resembles a cobra. the one that eats the funnyman seems so small in comparrison and looks very different imh. i hope there are two but i have a feeling its just inconsistancy, i love this movie and hope they make a2nd. they have plenty to work with after such an open ending and the lil paracytes are still roaming i imagine.
i thought there was two becuase of the diffrence in size between the one who smashed the bridge, and the one who toar up the city but they are the same monster there just isent anything besides the bridge to scale it two so it look biger in the city people scale it to the buldings witch makes it look huge. but the seen when it eats hud it looks smaller witch i dont know why that is. But the directer and producer said there is only one monster in this movie.
I'm just wondering... If this is the baby, and it's parents are somewhere else. And it arived to earth from space as we've seen. How do you expect 2 monster parents to navigate through space to earth to save it's baby? Not gonna happen, glad this was the only cloverfield. Seeing how dumb this was though, maybe the director and screenwriters might create a pilotable asteroid for the parents to use... -.-
@DeatxstrokeBlade It's an alien dumbass, rewatch the movie. It shows the thing landing in the ocean from space at the very end. The director even said so. Also, who the hell uses noob for comments? That's for games smartass.
@soccerjonesy you noob the director say it the thing at the end was a satelit that smash clover face and he wake up if hi is a alien im a space ship why he is without clothes aaa AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA hake mate
allright anyone who says theres more than one fucking monster is stupid as shit or hasnt seen the movie in theaters. I own it and have watched the special features THERES ONLY ONE MONSTER, they show drawings and 3d images of it multiple times and not once do they ever reffer to a second monster. And no there was no sattelite falling from the sky. its fucking space shit doesnt fall there. Theres no gravity. And a sattelitle would burn up on reentry even if it did.
There are two monsters. The one in the ocean the used it's tail to destroy the bridge. The one that you see multiple times is another. The first monster has a flat tail. The second one has a more rounded blunt tail.
Are u a fucking idiot?!?!?! there all the same monster u moron!!!! The so called first is the monsters tail!!! THERE'S ONLY ONE MONSTER!!!! The movie staff nicknamed the 'only' monster "clover" there's only one retard!!!!!!!!!!!
i think the one that ate the camara men is the baby while the giant one attacking the city is the mother but im sure there were many other babies running around so im pretty sure there are many monsters.
it is a baby woken up by a fallen satellite it was in the sea the whole time. the director has stated this many many times but no one listens. fun fact for ya we know more about outer space than the furthest depths of the ocean. maybe it is real down there 0.O so anyways...MYSTERY SOLVED XD only one monster
There were actually 2 monsters in this film. The monster at the end which eats the cameraman is the parent. The monster you see before the group head ito the subway is the baby. There are differences.
okay did anybody else see that in monster 2 obviosly at the beginning frame theres a tail but once hud turns a little the monster is totally flipped around at 0:23 tail 0:29 other monster
The monster that eats Hud has red eyes, yet the 'first' one has black ones, even the official toy thing has the black eyes so lighting can't be an excuse.
Uh, sorry to break it to everyone, but there is only ONE giant monster in that movie. Yes, it looks different in like, every scene, but that's just cause of the place the characters were in at the time, the time of day, CGI mishaps in size scale, etc.
There is one monster. Personally, I CANNOT wait to see if the mother/father shows up if that's the child. Can you imagine how HUGE that thing would be? Freaks me out to think about it.
Dude, the only reason why you think that there are 4 monsters is because you just showed every time in the movie where you see the monster... in the bridge scene, the "tenticle" is not a tenticle, its the monster's tail. and in the other scene. the 2nd monster it doesent have hoofs... those are just the monster's hands on its chest. it looks like hoofs because the hands are griping into a fist. the reason why there are different teeth and that the brain is bigger is just the angle!
its only 1.....the way that it looked soo different is cause it prob transform......or maybe it transform because it got weaker but idk but im soo sure its only 1 monster
lol,..theres only 2 monsters n this movie,...the person who made this vid thought EVRY seen with a monster n it showed a difrent monster,..but its jus a realy ODD looking creature
You freak!!!.... the the first pic its the monster tail!!... the second and third are the same legs.. get some glasses and the last one is the entire monster my god!!
Clover doesn't have a tail. And guys, dudes, guys dudes. They're running away from something, that's why they're on the bridge. Now the monster's tail doesn't go around the city, into the water, and smash the bridge. I doubt it even has a tail.
the whole point the baby was attacking is kuz it was shreiking and like ppl tought it was trying to do harm but really it waz calling its mom i dont remember wat part but a satelite fell somwhere and it woke up the mom
i agree with myuzernamerulez kuz the mom has 2 pairs of extra hands in the stomch area and the baby only has 1 pair but theres 2 more 1st the little ones that look like big spiders and 2nd the whale looking thing that kills jason
There are two monsters but you are missing the most obvious point. Those appendages on the monsters stomach. The 1st monster has 2 pairs of those, just look at the part where they are watching it on the news. The 2nd monster that eats Hud only has one pair. That is proof you cannot deny, there is more than one monster. Look if you don't believe me.
notice how its all different lighting and u cant see the faces the same of the monster in each shot. and also the bridge was attacked by something in the water and in the last shot at the end the monster had gill like flaps on the side of its head. coincidence?
there is only one monster. there MAYBE 2 but no more than 2. They need to make a sequel or a prequel. the prequel showing how it all happened. and the sequel is just like any other movie and not like the 1st one and its from the armys POV. or the sequel could be from the guys point of view that was recording with his cell phone on the bridge. or it could be from another city?
Dude the thing that destroyed the bridge was the F-ing tail the tail loos somewhat like a tentacle. Wait Sandeach just got it The 2nd monster could be the mom that the infant Clover could be looking for. Ha Any one agree?
this is it, jj mathafuckin abrams said his goddamn self that there isONE, no you dont understand, ONE, OK, ONE fuckin monster ok, ONE MONSTER, i will repeat it again for the retards and dumbasses that still believe, there is ONE MONSTER, ok the dude who produced the movie said there is ONE MONSTER so please do people like me, realrs555 and imawhore499 and other smart people a favor and SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT MORE THAN ONE MONSTER
okay let's see from JJ's perspective for a second if you were going to make a second movie would you be going around telling everyone the plot for the next movie hell secrecy and the unknown was the main selling point for the first movie and it will be that way for the second movie IF HE MAKES ONE I know that if I were in his shoes I would lie my ass off about a SECOND MONSTER
The whole ide behind movies like this is about secrets... "secrets with no answers". And these secrets leads to theorys... theorys that we come up with becuse we want to belive that there are more secrets.
And suddenly some guy says: Hey there are more then one monster, then a second say the same and then a third one, then another, another and another and so on... And after a while... Everyone belives there are more then one monster!!!
When the bridge goes down you can see the big tail and the monster who goes around the city eating people don't have so big tail so.. but that what i think so :3
ignore the stupid annoying comments, there are proofs that it's not only 1 monster, and if it bothers you that mcuh that people say the same thing over and over again, disable the comments, as simple as that (if you need help, there are tutorials, or you can msg me :p)
its not an octopus its a cable from the bridge but there are rumors of two monsters i cant wait for the second its about how this monster is a baby and the mother comes in for the 2nd
ok what i know is the monster is a "baby" becuase JJ Abrams said himself it was also the first scene is the monsters tail breakin the bridge not a tentacle from and octopuss
They simply were inconsistent with the scale of the monster. They fucked up, or made a lame attempt at ambiguity. The U.S. Godzilla remake had all kinds of scale issues as well.
first of all the thing that smashed the bridge was its tail. Second: the 'horse legs' are the same monster's small arms which are curled up in a way that it looks like a horse leg.(1 of 2 which are underneath its two larger arms)
do people STILL talk about more monsters? it's been out for over a fucking year, get over yourselves...it's been officially announced that there was just one monster. but shit, who am I to tell people what to do? knock yourselves out.
dont think of me as an ass, but actually if you pay attention to most of this kinda of crap its actually a supposed extinct species the military knew about them I guess and destroyed all eggs but one and the heat from a japanese satellite caused it to hatch. odd isnt it?
@lilking1453 I saw the movie three times too, but actually the group sent to collect the satellite I'm pretty sure they were killed by the monster or the parasites.
and 1 is only it's tail... have you ever minded that you almost never see the whole monster? number 4 is a little different though, that's what i thought myself while watching it, but maybe it is because it got hit by all those bombs some time before that scene, or maybe it is because you never see it in such great detail anywhere else in the movie
there all the same lol the bridge was hit by its tail most of the movie its destroying things with its tail and the other 3 all show that he has long legs with a tail just from a different angle lol but the baby ones in the subway there different
3rd one still has that same tail AND the horse legs you were talking about....so your video in itself shows that its the same monster, just from different angles thanks
its true there are atleast 2 monsters cuz there are different facial features on the ones showed. the loegs really dont matter i guess but other than that :\ no comments lol
in the scenes they referred to the monster as IT, i never heard them say THEM. If they wanted two monsters in the movie they would have made it clear there were two. they wouldn't dick around that much
there r 2 if u watch where the tale hits the road or bridge and right behind it the other bridge falls and the helicopters lights go up from tht a little bit and it looks like something nocked it down
ok one there is only one monster it has a big long tail frog like hands and 2 front arms like gorilla ones and it has been sleeping in new york for about 10 000 years and it is a baby
Just wait till the next movie, then you will all find out and the monsters in the movie are only babies so when there adults they will be really really really big like MASSIVE, the director said that on a video on youtube, search it.
One is the mom the other one the the baby
ddelga1234 2 weeks ago
@soccerjonesy Your the idiot that's a satellite the the satellite falls in the ocean sinks and lands on the monster and wake him up. JJ Abrams said that the monster us native to earth it's not an alien
MrGodzilla445 2 months ago
@20ftTurd A satellite
MrGodzilla445 2 months ago
@gamerboykyle1 It's one monster JJ Abrams said that they just had persective issues
MrGodzilla445 2 months ago
@TheSamdog911 You can shove what you think up your arse because there is only one monster in that movie there us no whale monster there us only the main monster which is an animal not an alien it's native to earth and it was asleep and a satellite woke the monster attacked and in the poster it said someTHING Has found us someTHINGS
MrGodzilla445 2 months ago
y el qe tiene 2 cabezas??para mi qe hay uno al principio...fijate...
Rodrigo19973 5 months ago
ok. the monsters tail seemed small when we saw it at the park but when we saw it on the bridge, it's giant. personally, i think it could have been mummy or daddy monster that broke the bridge. we will find out in the second film
gamerboykyle1 7 months ago
@gamerboykyle1 One monster. A baby.
CloverWebisodes 7 months ago
they said the monster was here already and that a comet woke it up
20ftTurd 8 months ago
@20ftTurd Satellite, not a comet.
CloverWebisodes 7 months ago
I have to admit that the creature in the park looks nothing like the "Bat" looking one in the city streets.
willdewit1971 8 months ago
@willdewit1971 i agree.
gamerboykyle1 7 months ago
@willdewit1971 It unhinges it's jaw, that's why it looks different.
CloverWebisodes 7 months ago
Let's see...
1. Clover's Tail
2. Clover
3. Also Clover
Gamoroid 9 months ago
FAKE!!!
derrenshonan 9 months ago
Interesting theory, but alternatively...
Maybe the monster can shapeshift?????
Nascarboy426 10 months ago
@Nascarboy426 No.
CloverWebisodes 7 months ago
the first one isnt like a snake dude that was its tail that swipped at the bridge and broke it
David67969 11 months ago
when clover is attacking the city later on in the film and takes out the chopper it strongly resembles a cobra. the one that eats the funnyman seems so small in comparrison and looks very different imh. i hope there are two but i have a feeling its just inconsistancy, i love this movie and hope they make a2nd. they have plenty to work with after such an open ending and the lil paracytes are still roaming i imagine.
markeyboynum1 1 year ago
i thought there was two becuase of the diffrence in size between the one who smashed the bridge, and the one who toar up the city but they are the same monster there just isent anything besides the bridge to scale it two so it look biger in the city people scale it to the buldings witch makes it look huge. but the seen when it eats hud it looks smaller witch i dont know why that is. But the directer and producer said there is only one monster in this movie.
213woodstock213 1 year ago
I'm just wondering... If this is the baby, and it's parents are somewhere else. And it arived to earth from space as we've seen. How do you expect 2 monster parents to navigate through space to earth to save it's baby? Not gonna happen, glad this was the only cloverfield. Seeing how dumb this was though, maybe the director and screenwriters might create a pilotable asteroid for the parents to use... -.-
soccerjonesy 1 year ago
@soccerjonesy IS A PREISTORIC MONSTER NOT A ALIEN......................noob
DeatxstrokeBlade 1 year ago
@DeatxstrokeBlade It's an alien dumbass, rewatch the movie. It shows the thing landing in the ocean from space at the very end. The director even said so. Also, who the hell uses noob for comments? That's for games smartass.
soccerjonesy 1 year ago
@soccerjonesy you noob the director say it the thing at the end was a satelit that smash clover face and he wake up if hi is a alien im a space ship why he is without clothes aaa AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA hake mate
DeatxstrokeBlade 1 year ago
okay im fucking done searching to squeeze every single little detail out of this fkn movie! IVE HAD ENOUGH LEAVE ME ALONE
Hellsaimed 1 year ago
There only one damn monster. This video just show different views of it, but it's the same one.....
MVMusicMan 1 year ago
allright anyone who says theres more than one fucking monster is stupid as shit or hasnt seen the movie in theaters. I own it and have watched the special features THERES ONLY ONE MONSTER, they show drawings and 3d images of it multiple times and not once do they ever reffer to a second monster. And no there was no sattelite falling from the sky. its fucking space shit doesnt fall there. Theres no gravity. And a sattelitle would burn up on reentry even if it did.
illfightyou4money 1 year ago
There is only one monster
thomascharlieandrew 1 year ago
theres also a whale thing, which actully takes out the bridge with one of its fins, and it ripps off the statue of liberty's head.
chadkoel 1 year ago
There are two monsters. The one in the ocean the used it's tail to destroy the bridge. The one that you see multiple times is another. The first monster has a flat tail. The second one has a more rounded blunt tail.
Maxwildcat 1 year ago
Are u a fucking idiot?!?!?! there all the same monster u moron!!!! The so called first is the monsters tail!!! THERE'S ONLY ONE MONSTER!!!! The movie staff nicknamed the 'only' monster "clover" there's only one retard!!!!!!!!!!!
mitchomainiaOfreedom 1 year ago
there's one monster it just got some teeth knocked out and the bridge part the monster had a hard on and hit the bridge with it duh
michaelguy124 1 year ago
blah there's only one monster and thats the baby :)
lilking1453 1 year ago
i think the one that ate the camara men is the baby while the giant one attacking the city is the mother but im sure there were many other babies running around so im pretty sure there are many monsters.
brago911 1 year ago
well i will just go ahead and take the word of the people who made the movies words for it. one monster.
patdestruction 1 year ago
There is 2 giant monsters in this movie. A mom and a baby. The baby kills people, the mom doesnt because she is looking 4 her baby.
womys 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it is a baby woken up by a fallen satellite it was in the sea the whole time. the director has stated this many many times but no one listens. fun fact for ya we know more about outer space than the furthest depths of the ocean. maybe it is real down there 0.O so anyways...MYSTERY SOLVED XD only one monster
MrAfroPanda 1 year ago
There were actually 2 monsters in this film. The monster at the end which eats the cameraman is the parent. The monster you see before the group head ito the subway is the baby. There are differences.
The1979Warriors 1 year ago
@The1979Warriors .... i think the monster who is killing hud, are the baby, because hes loking "young"
and the first one is the mother
Wrenchcool 1 year ago
@Wrenchcool all shall be revealed in the sequel lmao!!!
The1979Warriors 1 year ago
it not a octupos, its the tail you idiot
mark33850 1 year ago
he puts it in spanish?
nickstick56 1 year ago
Did LSD kill JFK? Google The Daylight Test.
thedaylighttest 1 year ago
There were many monsters in Cloverfield. 1 big one and all them small ones that fell off it. The thing on the bridge was the big ones tail.
Celly222 1 year ago
1:07 i though leg was his penis
carclain123 1 year ago
I thought that was clover's tail. Are you sure that's an octopus monster?
bluehorse1214 1 year ago
dude u can see they the same on the bridge it was the tail and on the other u can really see they look smimiliar
14deathsoul 1 year ago
For fuck sake why is everyone getting so hung up on the ten monster assumptions on cloverfield
Its a film
let us all have opinions without putting one another down and trying to be miss/mr know it alls here
greeneyedmonster666 1 year ago
okay did anybody else see that in monster 2 obviosly at the beginning frame theres a tail but once hud turns a little the monster is totally flipped around at 0:23 tail 0:29 other monster
Songboy1997 2 years ago
i think all these differences are coming from mistakes and incoherence, so there must be only one monster.
But who care :) this film is great ;)
derculinaskar 2 years ago
how come all toy hippos are blue or purple. but real hippos are brown
burnticeblues 2 years ago
@burnticeblues because the toy hippos are made in china! and chinese people don't really know what hippos look like!
ExplosiveMaterial27 1 year ago
The monster that eats Hud has red eyes, yet the 'first' one has black ones, even the official toy thing has the black eyes so lighting can't be an excuse.
Yaridovich23 2 years ago
57 when they bombed the monster that was fing epic
ciclesirjr 2 years ago
@ciclesirjr Totally was..=]
TwilightJunkie91 1 year ago
i think the "octopus" is just its leg who knows it could tense up if its out of the water because it needs to keep up right
garra667 2 years ago
lol octopus, this guy is retarded. and 4 monsters, lol
99455172 2 years ago
No genius -___- The "Octopus" Appears to be the tail...
Familyguy812 2 years ago
Uh, sorry to break it to everyone, but there is only ONE giant monster in that movie. Yes, it looks different in like, every scene, but that's just cause of the place the characters were in at the time, the time of day, CGI mishaps in size scale, etc.
There is one monster. Personally, I CANNOT wait to see if the mother/father shows up if that's the child. Can you imagine how HUGE that thing would be? Freaks me out to think about it.
iisl33t 2 years ago 12
@iisl33t Sorry to break it to you but there ARE more than 1 monsters.The whale the main one,and the spiders
TheSamdog911 5 months ago
the thing thats wierd is the tale that smashes the bridge looks WAY bigger then the actual monsters tale
skboiz 2 years ago 3
I think the "Octopus" is it's tail
Perfectedidiot21 2 years ago
4th is the baby 2nd and 3rd are the same and the first is either just its tail or the supposed"whale version"
Menace2290 2 years ago 2
Best movie ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
skizmsucks23 2 years ago 19
@skizmsucks23 i know!!!!!!!!!
godofwar3awesome1 1 year ago
Dude, the only reason why you think that there are 4 monsters is because you just showed every time in the movie where you see the monster... in the bridge scene, the "tenticle" is not a tenticle, its the monster's tail. and in the other scene. the 2nd monster it doesent have hoofs... those are just the monster's hands on its chest. it looks like hoofs because the hands are griping into a fist. the reason why there are different teeth and that the brain is bigger is just the angle!
danielx165 2 years ago
kkkkkkkkk rec.
clandoslupus 2 years ago
There wasn't 3 monster, there only was 3 bad CGI techniques for one creature.
jones13013 2 years ago 2
its only 1.....the way that it looked soo different is cause it prob transform......or maybe it transform because it got weaker but idk but im soo sure its only 1 monster
alrightlol 2 years ago
First is its tail, 2nd and 3rd are the same, and the 4th is the only baby.
TheStickFigureMaster 2 years ago
the first is its tail
flabpackforu 2 years ago
I NO SPANISH NOW :DDDDDD
cake43217 2 years ago
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
wallytalivan 2 years ago
gogtjgog has right ther is 1 monster
1st: it is the tail of the monster(do you have the dvd look at the featurettes!!)
2nd: you can´t look!! a horse!!!!!
3rt and 4th: its the same monster but another perpektive
NoMe4N 2 years ago
If the first one was a cephalopod kaiju, he could be Viras or Gezora.
samandmrcheese 2 years ago
you are right but there are 2 monsters at the bridge scene the first one breaks the bridge the second is on top of it
FJG1999 2 years ago
no. There is not. It is one monster. I saw the movie. All of those features... are ONE monster. Just lettin' You know...
demondabat792 2 years ago 2
Actually, JJ Abrams said there are two monsters, so 2. (if you dont belive me, just watch that fucking bonuses on DVD)
e6e2e3e1 2 years ago
yes two monstors are the big monster and the parasites
natjyh 2 years ago
lol,..theres only 2 monsters n this movie,...the person who made this vid thought EVRY seen with a monster n it showed a difrent monster,..but its jus a realy ODD looking creature
11033066099 2 years ago
yh brandon is right and if there were 4 monsters it should be in the news in cloverfield theres only 1
NightShadeDragon 2 years ago
all the clips are from the same monster
brandon18888 2 years ago
only one monster, the only diffrent monsters there is the parasites,
gogtjgog 2 years ago
You freak!!!.... the the first pic its the monster tail!!... the second and third are the same legs.. get some glasses and the last one is the entire monster my god!!
rockleefight2 2 years ago 3
I think is the same monster that is just growing up fast as hell
setaconeze 2 years ago
its not like an octopus its its tail ther is only 2
hawkstar569 2 years ago
actually theres only 1
aleric111 2 years ago
what was the last thing ??
ubercato 2 years ago
i think its called "Parasite"
peace36660 2 years ago
Clover doesn't have a tail. And guys, dudes, guys dudes. They're running away from something, that's why they're on the bridge. Now the monster's tail doesn't go around the city, into the water, and smash the bridge. I doubt it even has a tail.
PresidentialSalt 2 years ago
tail is probably clovers tail
charliejones1996 2 years ago
I am correcting myself. There is 1 monster only. There's a video of word from the director of this movie that it's one monster only.
kotaro07 2 years ago
the whole point the baby was attacking is kuz it was shreiking and like ppl tought it was trying to do harm but really it waz calling its mom i dont remember wat part but a satelite fell somwhere and it woke up the mom
dxsmjoo7 2 years ago
i agree with myuzernamerulez kuz the mom has 2 pairs of extra hands in the stomch area and the baby only has 1 pair but theres 2 more 1st the little ones that look like big spiders and 2nd the whale looking thing that kills jason
dxsmjoo7 2 years ago
There are two monsters but you are missing the most obvious point. Those appendages on the monsters stomach. The 1st monster has 2 pairs of those, just look at the part where they are watching it on the news. The 2nd monster that eats Hud only has one pair. That is proof you cannot deny, there is more than one monster. Look if you don't believe me.
Myusernamerulez 2 years ago
Theres a possible 2. Not3 but 2 monsters
kotaro07 2 years ago
yeah, the 'Octopus' was its tail, there are 2
BushFries 2 years ago
notice how its all different lighting and u cant see the faces the same of the monster in each shot. and also the bridge was attacked by something in the water and in the last shot at the end the monster had gill like flaps on the side of its head. coincidence?
TheGrim622 2 years ago
there is only one monster. there MAYBE 2 but no more than 2. They need to make a sequel or a prequel. the prequel showing how it all happened. and the sequel is just like any other movie and not like the 1st one and its from the armys POV. or the sequel could be from the guys point of view that was recording with his cell phone on the bridge. or it could be from another city?
pelini0844 2 years ago
And another thing Did they kill the monster with all those bombs? If they did that means there is another monster sorry for the dought.
Sandeach 2 years ago
Dude the thing that destroyed the bridge was the F-ing tail the tail loos somewhat like a tentacle. Wait Sandeach just got it The 2nd monster could be the mom that the infant Clover could be looking for. Ha Any one agree?
Sandeach 2 years ago
Could be
Vorketheshammy 2 years ago
this is it, jj mathafuckin abrams said his goddamn self that there isONE, no you dont understand, ONE, OK, ONE fuckin monster ok, ONE MONSTER, i will repeat it again for the retards and dumbasses that still believe, there is ONE MONSTER, ok the dude who produced the movie said there is ONE MONSTER so please do people like me, realrs555 and imawhore499 and other smart people a favor and SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT MORE THAN ONE MONSTER
blackboisk8r 2 years ago
okay let's see from JJ's perspective for a second if you were going to make a second movie would you be going around telling everyone the plot for the next movie hell secrecy and the unknown was the main selling point for the first movie and it will be that way for the second movie IF HE MAKES ONE I know that if I were in his shoes I would lie my ass off about a SECOND MONSTER
blades40 2 years ago
the first shot was from its tail
realrs555 2 years ago
thank you, know one belived me
blackboisk8r 2 years ago
why the hell would you say know instead of no
flyinghotdogsbaby310 2 years ago
those r all just shots of the same monster...
imawhore499 2 years ago
LITSEN UP PEOPLE!!!
You all have been brainwashed.
The whole ide behind movies like this is about secrets... "secrets with no answers". And these secrets leads to theorys... theorys that we come up with becuse we want to belive that there are more secrets.
And suddenly some guy says: Hey there are more then one monster, then a second say the same and then a third one, then another, another and another and so on... And after a while... Everyone belives there are more then one monster!!!
Lerborn 2 years ago
I believe in the theory of three monsters. 2 parents and a baby monster.
jackylegs94 2 years ago
There are 2 monsters
When the bridge goes down you can see the big tail and the monster who goes around the city eating people don't have so big tail so.. but that what i think so :3
kentzu32 2 years ago
nope just one baby and parasites
my18yearoldaccount 2 years ago
ignore the stupid annoying comments, there are proofs that it's not only 1 monster, and if it bothers you that mcuh that people say the same thing over and over again, disable the comments, as simple as that (if you need help, there are tutorials, or you can msg me :p)
joshgd86 2 years ago
stfu all there is 5 monsters the tail that killed jason was a whale like monster so in the sequel there is an invasion
Yirlkryan 2 years ago
i do agree there is more than one but the "1st" was its tail, and the "3rd" looked a lot like the second i think theres only 2, the 2nd and 4th
JoJoAnima 2 years ago
on em0nster
is enoguh
roberto121395 2 years ago
1, 2, 3, and 4 are the same monster. the first is the monster's tail.
MEGAwolfy 2 years ago 2
its not an octopus its a cable from the bridge but there are rumors of two monsters i cant wait for the second its about how this monster is a baby and the mother comes in for the 2nd
FIREemblum274 2 years ago
ok what i know is the monster is a "baby" becuase JJ Abrams said himself it was also the first scene is the monsters tail breakin the bridge not a tentacle from and octopuss
anyway awesome movie
prognegi95 2 years ago
0:09 PwNeD
kyleWHV 2 years ago
They simply were inconsistent with the scale of the monster. They fucked up, or made a lame attempt at ambiguity. The U.S. Godzilla remake had all kinds of scale issues as well.
ArtznCraphs 2 years ago
YES SOME ONE AGREES WITH ME!!!!
ilovejapan888 2 years ago
first of all the thing that smashed the bridge was its tail. Second: the 'horse legs' are the same monster's small arms which are curled up in a way that it looks like a horse leg.(1 of 2 which are underneath its two larger arms)
puzzleman991 2 years ago
i agree one monster
rrmmt23 2 years ago
Same monster. get over it.
TYLERREDICKHUGEFAN 2 years ago
that was its tail that broke the bridge dumb ass...
calciem 2 years ago
your english is really bad
Tyoda2712 2 years ago
do people STILL talk about more monsters? it's been out for over a fucking year, get over yourselves...it's been officially announced that there was just one monster. but shit, who am I to tell people what to do? knock yourselves out.
Zaiduko 2 years ago 2
ok?
Bigpoper95 2 years ago
ok ur face
Zaiduko 2 years ago
......youtube exploring asshole
Bigpoper95 2 years ago
I explored your mom.
Zaiduko 2 years ago
Comment removed
Zaiduko 2 years ago
its the same damn monster the whole film, JJ Abrams has even said this, you conspiracy nuts need to put this to bed now.
Dungarth 2 years ago
lol I don't even know why you guys care, I mean it's just a movie
84Haryybl 2 years ago
possible shape shifter =p
sLvR1169 2 years ago
no, I think theres 3 now, the one that eats ben looks like the 1 that has 'horse legs.
Doyvidtheginger 2 years ago
that is no brain it is it's lungs
XLightningshopex 2 years ago
i love that type of alien
deathblock9789 2 years ago
dont think of me as an ass, but actually if you pay attention to most of this kinda of crap its actually a supposed extinct species the military knew about them I guess and destroyed all eggs but one and the heat from a japanese satellite caused it to hatch. odd isnt it?
mtndew6911 2 years ago
@mtndew6911 huh? it didnt hatch and i dont even think the military knew what it was! i saw the movie 3 times!!
lilking1453 1 year ago
@lilking1453 I saw the movie three times too, but actually the group sent to collect the satellite I'm pretty sure they were killed by the monster or the parasites.
mtndew6911 1 year ago
opps i forgot the satellite crashed into the ocean and the egg was at the bottom of some deep trench
HUD WAS RIGHT! :D
mtndew6911 2 years ago
wtf? the legs of 2 and 3 are EXACTLY the same!
and 1 is only it's tail... have you ever minded that you almost never see the whole monster? number 4 is a little different though, that's what i thought myself while watching it, but maybe it is because it got hit by all those bombs some time before that scene, or maybe it is because you never see it in such great detail anywhere else in the movie
KingAfter77 2 years ago 2
well I only say the head in broad daylight at the end....that makes a huge difference when its not moving and just staring at you
w0nd 2 years ago
same shiit
WARDANAK 2 years ago
different day.
Stimich 2 years ago
there all the same lol the bridge was hit by its tail most of the movie its destroying things with its tail and the other 3 all show that he has long legs with a tail just from a different angle lol but the baby ones in the subway there different
a1dzcannon 2 years ago
3rd one still has that same tail AND the horse legs you were talking about....so your video in itself shows that its the same monster, just from different angles thanks
w0nd 2 years ago
The diffrentece is the angle and it's state of power remember it was fighting the bombs and guns and tanks so...
Meganeon010 2 years ago
there is five that i know couse of the subway spiders
jk2772 2 years ago
its true there are atleast 2 monsters cuz there are different facial features on the ones showed. the loegs really dont matter i guess but other than that :\ no comments lol
cribs262 2 years ago
in the scenes they referred to the monster as IT, i never heard them say THEM. If they wanted two monsters in the movie they would have made it clear there were two. they wouldn't dick around that much
w0nd 2 years ago
lol few "teets"
Theonegamefreak 2 years ago
get over it there is only 1 its just the lighting and the camera angles
Dinobot2468 2 years ago
there r 2 if u watch where the tale hits the road or bridge and right behind it the other bridge falls and the helicopters lights go up from tht a little bit and it looks like something nocked it down
plotbad 2 years ago
It was the tail. >.>
MagnusRulerHardt 2 years ago 2
there's only 1 monster maybe 2...you may need to compare the monster on 0:42 with the one on 1:13...their faces are different
Draziel696 2 years ago
Umh.. no. They looked the same. And WHY would they take the time to animate 2 different models of the monster? >.>
MagnusRulerHardt 2 years ago
the first one is like an octopus? are you sure the octopus thing isnt that tail you can see in your second monster clip?
w0nd 2 years ago
I didn't say it was an octopus thing. I said it was a tail.
MagnusRulerHardt 2 years ago
not you...whn I quote someone it never goes tot he right person sorry
w0nd 2 years ago
ok lol
MagnusRulerHardt 2 years ago
omg, there is ONLY one monster in this movie...
Omnisoldier 2 years ago 2
the bridge was hit by a creatures tail
sthawk9 2 years ago
Angleofdeath is spot on.. loved this movie but u are so full of swine flu is untrue!
Bateman666666 2 years ago
omggg stop saying he forgot one! or more...he doesnt try to show you the exact number, he is saying there are more than 2!!!
dekomondo 2 years ago
THERE IS 2 NOT 20 2
mewman345 2 years ago
there is a satellite at the end of the movie that falls out of the sky so it came form outter space or i dont know
screamoguy100 2 years ago
ok one there is only one monster it has a big long tail frog like hands and 2 front arms like gorilla ones and it has been sleeping in new york for about 10 000 years and it is a baby
screamoguy100 2 years ago
not to burst your bubbles, but their all the same
DarthStewart202 2 years ago
are u eff n me all the monsters are the same
he has a tail first of all
skatereatsmonster 2 years ago
Just wait till the next movie, then you will all find out and the monsters in the movie are only babies so when there adults they will be really really really big like MASSIVE, the director said that on a video on youtube, search it.
COMEDYKINGno1 2 years ago
you forgot one, its