Progression of FBI & Marina Oswald statements after 9 weeks of illegal incarceration, threats of bodily harm & deportation, and brainwashing by the FBI & CIA.
12/3/63, FBI: "Marina said she had never seen Oswald practice with his rifle or any other firearm and he had never told her that he was going to practice". (22H763)
12/4/63, FBI: "She cannot recall ever hearing Oswald state that he was going to fire the rifle in practice or that he had fired it in practice". (22H785)
@funkmasterjee hard evidence is always made hard to come by. Try Bertrand Russell, a famous writer of that era. It is called "16 questions on the assassination".
One of the eyewitnesses to the Tippit kill was shot in the head, but survived. Another Tippit victim was the brother of Benevides, who saw the killer and NEVER said it was Oswald. Not even on the youtube did he say "Oswald". When the authorities are the criminals, do you speak anyway and get yourself or family killed?
@funkmasterjee what's your theory? and why is your theory more real-world than the mountain of incontrovertable, hard physical and circumstantial evidence against Oswald? What was in that long package Oswald was seen bringing into work the morning of the assassination? Curtain Rods? Why was Oswald photographed with the rifle that killed Kennedy? Why did Oswald flee the scene of the crime? Why did Oswald murder a police officer 45 minutes after the assassination? I'm waiting!
@abennett4Asshole - Why does your mother use a rented dildo with her John's? Why doesn't she tell you which one of her wino friends is your daddy? I'm waiting.
@abennett4 There is little evidence against Oswald. I'm not saying Oswald was totally innocent - IF he did act it was NOT alone. The package: who knows?? The strap on the rifle in the backgarden photos does NOT match the one on the supposed murder weapon. Oswald had some connection to Ferrie and other CIA - he panicked and fled. Oswald DID NOT murder Tippet. He was framed. The shells at the scene were incompatible with Oswald's (and any) revolver.
@funkmasterjee The package contained his rifle. Oswald told Wes Fraizier, who drove him into work, that it contained curtain rods. No curtain rods were ever found in the Book Depository and the room where he lived had perfectly good curtain rods. The shells at the scene of the Tippit murder were slightly undersized, but still compatible, with Oswald's pistol. Ballistic tests proved that at least one had been fired from Oswald's pistol.
@abennett4Asshole Idiot. Manufacturers of rifles and ammunition do not make them sometimes slightly undersized. "Hey guys, lets make some ammo that is 1/4 inch shorter for Oswald, and let's stamp it 38 Auto instead of 38 SPC". LOL !!! You totally fucking IDIOT. LOL. There was only ballistics lies from co-conspirator Hoover.
Frazier lied. There was no curtain rods package. The shipping clerk, Jack Edwin Dougherty, said Oswald did not carry a package to work that morning.
@jacobji5 Frazier didn't lie. Why would he lie? His sister saw Oswald put the package into Frazier's car. It was Oswald's rifle so of course he brought it into work, That's why Oswald went to the Paines the night before. Oswald's pistol had some work done on the barrel. That's why it didn't leave the markings on the bullets. The ballistc test proved Oswald's rifle fired the shots that hit Kennedy. You're just paranoid.
@abennett4Asshole his sister saw nothing. You come up with all kinds of lies. "The pistol had work done on the barrel". Such bullshit. Oswald never owned any guns in 1963. There were no ballistics tests on anything. The FBI is already on record for changing witness testimonies. That is a felony. You're just a dick sucking lying asshole.
And you admit your mother uses rented dildos. Tell us where she rents them from?
@abennett4 " Oswald's pistol had some work done on the barrel. That's why it didn't leave the markings on the bullets " - It doesn't matter. Then the revolver should STILL have matched up with the bullets. It didn't
@abennett4 There's no proof the package contained a rifle. The shells found at the Tippet murder were the WRONG kind for a revolver (any revolver). They would have FALLEN OUT of a revolver.
There is no such thing as undersize shells - they are meant to work with a specific caliber ONLY
The bullets found in Tippet could not be proven to match Oswald's revolver.
And by the way - Oswald did not own a pistol, he owned a revolver
@funkmasterjee Correction. Oswald did not own any gun. No rifle, no pistol, none. The picture in the backyard was Oswald's face pasted on DPD / CIA Roscoe White's body. Oswald's wife Marina originally denied taking any picture, until after she was brainwashed over a 9 week period from Dec to Jan. You should see the 1st interview of her afterward. It shows.
@jacobji5 marina saw the rifle with her own two eyes. I generally agree with you but I think on this you're wrong. There is little doubt that Oswald purchased a rifle and revolver by mail order.
@funkmasterjee Look at the video: Marina Oswald first interview.
It reveals how "out of sorts" she still is. I copied/posted some of the FBI/CIA incarceration statements. Note they are part of the WC record. Bertrand Russell in 1964 told the public she was under forced arrest for 9 weeks, 24/7.What would they doing with you for 9 weeks?
It was proven to be Oswald's face over Roscoe White's body, and that the CIA purchased the Z film. Dis-agents are here 24/7 to say otherwise
@abennett4 The shells at the Tippet shooting were incompatible with Oswald's (and any) revolver. They had NO rim at the back of the cartridge case - (which is essential to prevent a cartridge falling out of a revolver)
@funkmasterjee don't bother Tommy Lowery (whatever screen name he uses) with little details like "NO rim at the back of the cartridge case". He still can't get it.
And never tell mommy's little accident that all rifles in the world in 1963, just as today, have the caliber stamped on the barrel. Thus, making it impossible for 3 cops in broad daylight to mistakenly say an Italian 6.5mm was a 7.65 Mauser.
Zapruder never actually "owned" the film because he was ordered to go shoot the footage and turn it over to his handlers. So in reality he wasn't shooting his own movie as he was hired to shoot footage. Any money he received was hush money. Then the movie was retouched and altered. TV Fakery then and TV Fakery now (911)
I've been to Dallas and stood on that concrete pedestal. Getting up on that thing was no easy task. It's very high with nothing to boost up from. No wonder he took his secretary with him, to help the old guy up and off it.
Didn't Zapruder sell it to Time Life who held onto it for a while and then sold it..no..gave..no sold it back to the Zapruder family who then sold it to someone else..I think..or maybe they sold it onto someone else..or maybe...they're waiting to have it given back to them so they can sell it again....and then wait to have it given back to them again so they can...sell it to someone else..Who owns it right now?
Didn't Zapruder sell it to Time Life who held onto it for a while and then sold it..no..gave..no sold it back to the Zapruder family who then sold it to someone else..I think..or maybe they sold it onto someone else..or maybe...they're waiting to have it given back to them so they can sell it again....and then wait to have it given back to them again so they can...sell it to someone else..Who owns it right now?
sorry i crapped over the interview audio with music, but you should check out the original interview with Bennet, cuz he clarifies some things about the film. the channel is:
Progression of FBI & Marina Oswald statements after 9 weeks of illegal incarceration, threats of bodily harm & deportation, and brainwashing by the FBI & CIA.
12/3/63, FBI: "Marina said she had never seen Oswald practice with his rifle or any other firearm and he had never told her that he was going to practice". (22H763)
12/4/63, FBI: "She cannot recall ever hearing Oswald state that he was going to fire the rifle in practice or that he had fired it in practice". (22H785)
(continue below)
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
@jacobji5
" illegal incarceration, threats of bodily harm & deportation, and brainwashing by the FBI & CIA. "
I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong - but is there any hard evidence of that ? witness statements? documentary evidence ?
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee hard evidence is always made hard to come by. Try Bertrand Russell, a famous writer of that era. It is called "16 questions on the assassination".
One of the eyewitnesses to the Tippit kill was shot in the head, but survived. Another Tippit victim was the brother of Benevides, who saw the killer and NEVER said it was Oswald. Not even on the youtube did he say "Oswald". When the authorities are the criminals, do you speak anyway and get yourself or family killed?
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee the documented evidence is the WC FBI and Marina statements, as listed already for Dec 63 and Jan 64 in parenthesis.
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
2/3/64, Marina's brainwashed appearance at the WC with a CIA interpreter.
Mr. Rankin: "Did you learn at any time that he had been practicing with the rifle"?
Mrs. Oswald (CIA): "I think he went once or twice. I didn't actually see him take the rifle, but I knew he was practicing".
Mr. Rankin: "Could you give us a little help on how you knew"?
Mrs. Oswald (CIA): "He told me. And he would mention that in passing, he would say, "Well, today I will take the rifle along for practice". (1H14-15)
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
What's with the Drum and Bass ?? Totally ridiculous, inappropriate and distracting
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
Oswald acted alone
abennett4 3 months ago
@abennett4 Shill !
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
@funkmasterjee what's your theory? and why is your theory more real-world than the mountain of incontrovertable, hard physical and circumstantial evidence against Oswald? What was in that long package Oswald was seen bringing into work the morning of the assassination? Curtain Rods? Why was Oswald photographed with the rifle that killed Kennedy? Why did Oswald flee the scene of the crime? Why did Oswald murder a police officer 45 minutes after the assassination? I'm waiting!
abennett4 1 month ago
@abennett4Asshole - Why does your mother use a rented dildo with her John's? Why doesn't she tell you which one of her wino friends is your daddy? I'm waiting.
jacobji5 1 month ago
@jacobji5 She rents because your mother owns tham all.
abennett4 4 weeks ago
@abennett4 There is little evidence against Oswald. I'm not saying Oswald was totally innocent - IF he did act it was NOT alone. The package: who knows?? The strap on the rifle in the backgarden photos does NOT match the one on the supposed murder weapon. Oswald had some connection to Ferrie and other CIA - he panicked and fled. Oswald DID NOT murder Tippet. He was framed. The shells at the scene were incompatible with Oswald's (and any) revolver.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee The package contained his rifle. Oswald told Wes Fraizier, who drove him into work, that it contained curtain rods. No curtain rods were ever found in the Book Depository and the room where he lived had perfectly good curtain rods. The shells at the scene of the Tippit murder were slightly undersized, but still compatible, with Oswald's pistol. Ballistic tests proved that at least one had been fired from Oswald's pistol.
abennett4 4 weeks ago
@abennett4Asshole Idiot. Manufacturers of rifles and ammunition do not make them sometimes slightly undersized. "Hey guys, lets make some ammo that is 1/4 inch shorter for Oswald, and let's stamp it 38 Auto instead of 38 SPC". LOL !!! You totally fucking IDIOT. LOL. There was only ballistics lies from co-conspirator Hoover.
Frazier lied. There was no curtain rods package. The shipping clerk, Jack Edwin Dougherty, said Oswald did not carry a package to work that morning.
jacobji5 4 weeks ago 5
@jacobji5 Frazier didn't lie. Why would he lie? His sister saw Oswald put the package into Frazier's car. It was Oswald's rifle so of course he brought it into work, That's why Oswald went to the Paines the night before. Oswald's pistol had some work done on the barrel. That's why it didn't leave the markings on the bullets. The ballistc test proved Oswald's rifle fired the shots that hit Kennedy. You're just paranoid.
abennett4 4 weeks ago
@abennett4Asshole his sister saw nothing. You come up with all kinds of lies. "The pistol had work done on the barrel". Such bullshit. Oswald never owned any guns in 1963. There were no ballistics tests on anything. The FBI is already on record for changing witness testimonies. That is a felony. You're just a dick sucking lying asshole.
And you admit your mother uses rented dildos. Tell us where she rents them from?
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
@abennett4 " Oswald's pistol had some work done on the barrel. That's why it didn't leave the markings on the bullets " - It doesn't matter. Then the revolver should STILL have matched up with the bullets. It didn't
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@abennett4 There's no proof the package contained a rifle. The shells found at the Tippet murder were the WRONG kind for a revolver (any revolver). They would have FALLEN OUT of a revolver.
There is no such thing as undersize shells - they are meant to work with a specific caliber ONLY
The bullets found in Tippet could not be proven to match Oswald's revolver.
And by the way - Oswald did not own a pistol, he owned a revolver
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee Correction. Oswald did not own any gun. No rifle, no pistol, none. The picture in the backyard was Oswald's face pasted on DPD / CIA Roscoe White's body. Oswald's wife Marina originally denied taking any picture, until after she was brainwashed over a 9 week period from Dec to Jan. You should see the 1st interview of her afterward. It shows.
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
@jacobji5 marina saw the rifle with her own two eyes. I generally agree with you but I think on this you're wrong. There is little doubt that Oswald purchased a rifle and revolver by mail order.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee Look at the video: Marina Oswald first interview.
It reveals how "out of sorts" she still is. I copied/posted some of the FBI/CIA incarceration statements. Note they are part of the WC record. Bertrand Russell in 1964 told the public she was under forced arrest for 9 weeks, 24/7.What would they doing with you for 9 weeks?
It was proven to be Oswald's face over Roscoe White's body, and that the CIA purchased the Z film. Dis-agents are here 24/7 to say otherwise
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
@abennett4 The shells at the Tippet shooting were incompatible with Oswald's (and any) revolver. They had NO rim at the back of the cartridge case - (which is essential to prevent a cartridge falling out of a revolver)
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee don't bother Tommy Lowery (whatever screen name he uses) with little details like "NO rim at the back of the cartridge case". He still can't get it.
And never tell mommy's little accident that all rifles in the world in 1963, just as today, have the caliber stamped on the barrel. Thus, making it impossible for 3 cops in broad daylight to mistakenly say an Italian 6.5mm was a 7.65 Mauser.
jacobji5 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The sixth floor museum in Dallas Texas technically own the rights to the film.
ImeldaDavies 1 year ago
The sixth floor museum in Dallas Texas technically own thee rights to the film.
ImeldaDavies 1 year ago
Congratulations for making this film BOTH unwatchabe and inaudible. That takes a special kind of idiot
Rafterman123 1 year ago
Zapruder never actually "owned" the film because he was ordered to go shoot the footage and turn it over to his handlers. So in reality he wasn't shooting his own movie as he was hired to shoot footage. Any money he received was hush money. Then the movie was retouched and altered. TV Fakery then and TV Fakery now (911)
piasillo 2 years ago 6
I wouldn´t be surprised if what you are writing here is true..
Steenville 2 years ago
I've been to Dallas and stood on that concrete pedestal. Getting up on that thing was no easy task. It's very high with nothing to boost up from. No wonder he took his secretary with him, to help the old guy up and off it.
piasillo 2 years ago
it was easy for me...just like hopping up on a washing machine
Stevesk0011 2 years ago
Did you really star in Street Trash?
That is one fuking amazing film!
muckletoon 2 years ago
@piasillo That is true. His handler? Hunt, the oil multi-millionaire.
jacobji5 1 year ago
@jacobji5 Why would any conspiracy want a film making of the assassination ? sounds like BS
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
@piasillo You are so full of crap you stink.
IwshIcldstrtover 10 months ago
@IwshIcldstrtover XD
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
By the way.....the video is hilarious!
Mobilecheese 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yep.I've always wondered who owned it.
Didn't Zapruder sell it to Time Life who held onto it for a while and then sold it..no..gave..no sold it back to the Zapruder family who then sold it to someone else..I think..or maybe they sold it onto someone else..or maybe...they're waiting to have it given back to them so they can sell it again....and then wait to have it given back to them again so they can...sell it to someone else..Who owns it right now?
Or is it between sales..like sort of in limbo?
Mobilecheese 3 years ago
Yep.I've always wondered who owned it.
Didn't Zapruder sell it to Time Life who held onto it for a while and then sold it..no..gave..no sold it back to the Zapruder family who then sold it to someone else..I think..or maybe they sold it onto someone else..or maybe...they're waiting to have it given back to them so they can sell it again....and then wait to have it given back to them again so they can...sell it to someone else..Who owns it right now?
Or is it between sales..like sort of in limbo?
Mobilecheese 3 years ago
sorry i crapped over the interview audio with music, but you should check out the original interview with Bennet, cuz he clarifies some things about the film. the channel is:
TheQandACafe
and the interview starts here:
watch?v=ovkqqUYQ588
thanx
shitstinx 3 years ago