Added: 2 years ago
From: iHealthTube
Views: 1,313
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (86)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Actually you should say would you rather have a .01%chance of getting polio or a 1 in 56 % chance of getting autism!!!

  • It is the most OBVIOUS thing in the world that you do not bombard a new and delicate immune system with so many jabs - no wonder it wrecked so many kids.

  • Anti-vaccination is the worst kind of ignorance. Just watch a few independent videoes about this on youtube by people who actually KNOW WHAT THE HELL THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT.

  • @mortenlu

    I'm going to support you all the way here. Lets see peer reviewed papers rather than opinions. This is a crime...

    PS. Glutathione is a defense to oxidants not "heavy metals" alone... the video is subjective... there are many of these subtle "truth but not whole truths" in this argument and one must be careful when listening to this type of "information".

    Please read more about this than the "youtube docs" tell you... the shape of the argument is altered when knowledge is applied.

  • @wowsdrawkcab Your hypocrisy is staggering

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny

    I knew you missed me. Go back to your AIDS denialist videos.

  • @wowsdrawkcab "Miss" isn't the word. Smetimes I check to see if you're spreading your culty crap around. I grew up with it in the family so know the damage the Gallo cult can cause. Nobody is denying the existance of immune prblems. The cause is what's in dispute. I am also a denier ofbody thetans as a cause for illness.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny

    Try to stay on topic. Why don't you add something useful to this discussion?

  • @wowsdrawkcab Because what I felt like doing was pointing out what hypocriteyou are.

  • @wowsdrawkcab HAHAH, you have a AIDS denialist stalker!?

  • @mortenlu

    LOL yep no joke.

  • @wowsdrawkcab I know how you feel. Its a part hillarious, but mostly its just sad. I had a creationist\conspiracy theorist\"science is a lie" guy on my ass a while back. Until one glorious day he sent me this:

    "tOO BAD YOU DON'T HAVE A BRAIN NOW i HAVE TO BLOCK YOU. yOU COULD VE BEEN SOMEBODY MR NOTHING"

    I could have been somebody... if only he hadn't blocked me. LOL

  • @mortenlu Ok honey....if YOU have the scientific papers which prove the existance of Gallo's virus and linked it to imune prblems you feel free to share. Title Date and Journal and it has to hae Gallo's name on it. A virus of mass destruction was Gallo's bright idea and Gallo is the test kit patent holder.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny I'm sorry for being ignorant, but I don't even know what this dispute is about. I could go read up about it, but I don't think it will be worth my time. There are too many wackjobs for me to check out every conspiracy they can come up with. Instead, I rely on what the scientific consensus is, because I know how how it works. If I get a worthy cause to doubt it, I will educate myself on a topic.

    If you're saying HIV is not the cause of AIDS, that is just plain ridiculous.

  • @mortenlu Did you know that The World Health Organization cancelled the hetero aids epidemic over 2 years ago? Microbes do not discriminate. That mean that "aids" CAN'T be infectious. Infectious things spread.

    Google....There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

    " Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: “[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.”

    “A 25-year health campaign was misplaced...."

  • @mortenlu Years from now, people will find our acceptance of the HIV theory of AIDS as silly as we find those who excommunicated Galileo.” Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing the PCR, the basis for the HIV viral load tests.

    for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

    He's also in "House of Numbers"

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Did you just compare the modern scientific community to the inquisition of the 17th century? I feel sorry you and for people like you who buy into this crap. I have a "friend" just like you. Out of his mind. Believing anything as long as its on the internet and it contradicts the govenment or scientific consensus.

    You think you have outsmarted the people who are well educated in this, without having any idea for yourself. It very truly sad how people can become like that.

  • @mortenlu No I didn't. First...I"M not Kary Mulls. 2nd...Gallo did NOT follow the scientific method. He just falsfied his data, called press conference and patented a test.

    I grew up with Gallo's fake virus in the family. I was fully indoctrinated at one point but I've seen nothing but "exceptions" to the holy doctrine for the past 26 years.

    The burden of proof is on tose who make a claim not on those who dispute it. If You beleve in Gallo's fakevirus then you have the burden of proof.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny @mykoolaidtastesfunny According to wikipedia "NIH and the HHS cleared Gallo's group of any wrongdoing". Why are we talking about Gallo anyway? Do you believe Gallo's group are the only ones who has researched this? That is NOT how science works. He may have contributed to the discovery, but he is NOT key in the understanding we have today. Just as if we proved Darwin faked all his work would not change anything about our understanding of Evolution.

  • @mortenlu Lol...again...fuck wiki google....Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers

    " In 1993, governmental investigators determined Gallo had so poorly recorded his key and much-cited experiment that it was impossible to repeat and verify it. ....The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper of the four was "fraught with false and erroneous statements.....

  • Cont..." Further, a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations produced a staff report on the papers, containing scathing criticisms of their integrity. "

    Gallo was forced out of the NIH as a result. You can read about it here..."Science Fictions" by Jhn Crewsdon

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny I don't have any problem believing Gallo was an asswipe (aka I don't care). Luckily, I already explained this part. His misconducts are not important to our understanding. You think the entire scientific community got fooled by this one man? Get real.

  • @mortenlu Honey....ALL the "evidence" that Gallo's virus exists and cases aids are based on GALLO'S antibody tests.

    Since he found NOTHING then where did he come up with the "hiv" proteins used in/for ALL the "hiv" tests? Lucky guesses? Were they left on his door step with a note?

  • @mortenlu The entire scentific community has NOT been fooled. Google... IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

  • @mortenlu Ha! Also....they've never changed the antibody tests. The "hiv" proteins are exactly the same as the day Gallo patented the test. Which is "odd" because the reason they say there is no vaccine/cure is because Gallo's virus mutates sooooo rapidly. So....HOW does Gallo's virus both mutate and remain identical at the same time? Is it a magic virus?

  • @mortenlu The "hiv" proteins are exactly the same as the day GALLO patented his test..... p17/18, p24/25, p31/32, gp41, p53/55, gp120, and gp160.

    If YOU believe in Gallo's fake virus then YOU need to come up with thePRIMARY peer reviewed scienific papers where it was demonstrated those proteins belong to a nique viral entity and he linked it to immune prblems.

    Title Date and Journal and it better have GALLO'S name on it. GALLO is the "discoverer" and test kit patent holder.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Also, these Google searches you want people to do: They all lead to conspiracy articles. No wonder you believe what you believe when all you read is the denialists side. Ever heard about checking out both sides? Ever heard about intellectual honesty?

    And what are you talking about "holy doctrine"? What kind exceptions have you seen? And really, taking personal experience over scientific research? And please share your experiences so that I can have a chance to refute them.

  • @mortenlu Honey...you OBVIOUSLY didn't read any of them. I GREW up with Gallo's crap theory in the family and was fully indoctrinated at one point. I already said that. Can't you read? I know the orthodox side like the back of my hand. Maybe you should stop getting your "scientifc" info off of marketers wih NO scientific training.

  • Google.....The Guinea Pig Kids The BBC & The AIDSTruth Mafia

    " let's just take a look at who is this self appointed bunch at AIDS Truth?

    A dozen people who include a graduate student (Ken Witwer), a professor of economics (Nicoli Nattrass), several “HIV/AIDS activists” with no technical credentials (Martin Delaney, Nathan Geffen, Gregg Gonsalves, Richard Jefferys), and a PhD in a non-scientific discipline (Jeanne Bergman)...."

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Microbes don't discriminate? How about the risk of transmission anally is 21 or 42 times higher then vaginal transmission according to wiki (scientific paper included with link on wiki):

    In high-income countries, the risk of female-to-male transmission is 0.04% per act and male-to-female transmission is 0.08% per act. For various reasons, these rates are 4 to 10 times higher in low-income countries.[30] The rate for receptive anal intercourse is much higher, 1.7% per act.

  • @mortenlu Lmao...google....The unqualified (= without qualifications) gurus of Wikipedia

    Try Pubmed. (Padian NS, Shiboski SC, Glass SO, Vittinghoff E. 1997. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Northern California: results from a ten-year study. Am J Epidemiol 146, 350-357

    You can fin the direct link here...google....The Padian Waffle

    ZERO transmission even after years of unprotected sex...vaginal and anal zero is zero

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny I didn't read the entire document on Padian NS, but: Overall, 68 (19%) of the 360 female partners of HIV-infected men (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.0-23.3%) and two (2.4%) of the 82 male partners of HIV-infected women (95% CI 0.3-8.5%) were infected.

    Aren't those infections? With increased condom use, they saw a decrease in infections right?

  • @mortenlu"..... the ABSENCE of seroincident infection over the course of the study cannot be entirely attributed to significant behavior change. No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up" (Padian, pg 356.)

  • @mortenlu Here's the bottom line on the Padian Paper:

    1. It was the largest and longest epidemiological study of heterosexual transmission of HIV in America. (Padian, pg 354.)

    2. Not a single person in the prospective study contracted HIV, despite lots of sex with HIV+ individuals. (Padian, pg 354.)

  • Who is Kary Mulls? Google didn't tell me anything.

    And you're not the WHO? Captain Obvious are we? Are you trying to convince me that the WHO agrees with you!?!

  • @mortenlu The WHO are the ones who cancelled the hetero aids epidemic. Can't you read?

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny The WHO cancelled the epidemic, so fucking what? What does it tell us, that HIV has spread less (3 times less according to numbers I read) then anticipated. Maybe there was some political agenda pushing it, I don't really give a shit. It does not mean anything about HIV not being the cause for AIDS.

  • @mortenlu Um....because microbes do not discrminate. There's no such thing as a virus that "knows" whether or not someone is gay straight black white rich poor etc.

  • @mortenlu Lol....also stop LYING! You didn't actually check anything other than wiki and that infomercial site.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Lying where (cant see which post you responded to). And Im being perfectly serious here, so no need to stoop to that level. And I don't get how you can dismiss wiki as a source. I even told you how to get to the scientific papers it used as a source. Just google the quote, click on the wiki article and you got the link right there.

  • @mortenlu The lie is where you claimed you couldn't find any info about Kary Mullis.

    I dismiss wiki as a source because it's written by UNqualified people. My neighbor's cat can write for wiki

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Wiki monitors articles and has a VERY VERY good record in recent years for being accurate. and about Kary Mullis, yes easy to find info on, very hard when you misspell the name "Kary Mulls" you dipshit, I don't lie. Even to crazy people on youtube. Though Im not sure If Im gonna be bothered with you anymore. You are as delutioned as a religious person. The exact same type of reasoning. Ugh.

  • @mortenlu Wiki is written by AMATEURS. Period.

    I don't know why you call me "delusional" when you're the one who believes in something imaginary. No...calling people names is not evidence for the existance of Gallo's fake virus.

  • @mortenlu I don't really "misspell" this keyboard skips letters randomly and I get tired of going back to fix things

    "“It’s not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There are no such documents.”

    Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist Winner 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry inventing the PCR

  • for more google....IS “HIV” REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS? ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW” SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny I've seen the same kind of list on climate change skeptics. Am I supposed to be impressed? Watch this: watch?v=7sNyh6UccAk

  • @mortenlu Sweetie....TITLE DATE JOURNAL

    If you believe in Gallo's imaginary menace then you have the burden of proof.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny I don't know shit about HIV (Why the fuck do you still insist on calling it the gallo virus???) and what would be required from a paper on it, nor do I know how to find or read science papers, but I can do some searches and I'll post what I come up with.

    Just one question related to the video I posted though: Do you accept that there is a consensus about global warming? If yes, what is makes the list of "a few" scientists different from the one the warming deniers got?

  • @mortenlu because "hiv" has taken on almost religious connotations for people. They don't why they believe...they just beleeeeve. I like to remind people whose bright idea it was.

    The fact is that consensus in science means nothing. Science isn't a democracy. What you need is evidence in the form of empirical data.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny "The fact is that consensus in science means nothing. Science isn't a democracy. What you need is evidence in the form of empirical data."

    Of course consensus mean something. Not in itself perhaps, but it means that the people who know the subject, has examined the empirical data and formed that consensus. That is why I'd rather trust the experts over you. Can you mention any other scientific issue that has overwhelming consensus where you believe the consensus is wrong?

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Though I agree very strongly with what you say that science isn't a democracy. In the end, the scientists with the valid theory will prevail as has happened many times in the past. However, I'm sorry to say that its not hard to identify AIDS deniers as the same kind of people as the anti vaccine crowd or Homeopathy people.

  • @mortenlu Well yeah the truth will prevail. The WHO even cancelled Gallo's virus of mass destruction epidemic. Aids has remained in he same risk groups it began in....gay and straight druggies and broke ass people without access to clean water or basic medical care. Read the "no hetero aids epidemic"article. Do you think the WHO is in on the dissident conspiracy? For confirmation of some of it I have the direct link to the disclaimers on my channel under the pic of the Pope

  • @mortenlu Nobody is disputin the existance of immune problems so "aids denier" makes no sense. It's more like being a body thetan denier. I do NOT believe in Gallo's virus.

  • @mortenlu To see what else is making people sick google....AZT LABEL

    you know what a skull and crossbones means on a label right? That's pretty universal.

  • @mortenlu No...if consesnus meant anything the sun would have at one time rvolved around the earth. Consensus is about politics.

    I know I'm not a scientist. That's why I post quotes from experts with identities &credentials that are easily verified.

  • @mykoolaidtastesfunny Though I think we've come to a stalemate here. I'll come back if I can find any scientific paper that will meet your needs, but first I want the major points of what you're saying:

    1. HIV is not infectious? How do people get them, drugs? Any evidence of that?

    2. HIV does not cause AIDS? What does?

    Anything else thats important? Please be clear. Im no expert. Oh, and neither are you.

  • @mortenlu I'm saying snce Gallo never found anythg why think it exists? The only evidence that suggests it does are tests Gallo designed.

    The original ads cases were in rampant drug addicts gay or straight & chronically malnourished people without access to clean water or basic medical care. You don't need a virus of mass destruction to explain why those people die. Start with the tests. Wthout valid tests the whole thing falls down. I hve the direct links to the disclaimers on my channel

  • @mortenlu Lmao...concordance?!?! Honey you can write the book on logical fallacies using just that fraud's videos as examples. He used to go by Joemarklawson...his cmments are still up on myhiv soap box video. Then one day he shut that down and all his videos were uploaded to the new channel. He's in charge ofthe tutoring program of East Bumfuck HighSchool.

    He can't come up with any evidence either. He just makes scientology style propaganda videos

  • @mortenlu See if you can spot the logical fallacies...."proof" by consensus( his favorite) ad hominem aka shooting the messenger (his OTHER favorite) false dilemmas( if you dn't believe in Gallo's virus you're a Murderer!) guilt by association (ya know like in that video you suggested which offers ZERO evidence but attempts to link intelligent design with askng for evidence of Gallo's imaginary friend)

    Title Date and Journal or take your FAITH in Gallo's virus and shove it up your ass.

  • @mortenlu I saw your wiki source but you can't read the article unless you're a subscriber. I told you whereto find THE larges and longest study of hetero transmission ever done in N America. For the direct link to the whole study google....THE PADIAN WAFFLE

    as an added bonus that takes you to a site run by an actual scientist.

  • @mortenlu I'm not the World Health Organization either you idiot. 

  • @mortenlu Nobody disputes the existance of immune problems. What's in dispute is the cause. It certainly can't be something imaginary.

  • We need more honest Dr.'s like you!!!!!

  • this guy is the pat robertson of medicine

    would you rather have a 0.01% chance of getting autism of would you rather have polio?

  • my little brother done his vaccine then i dont know, about a month later or something he was diagnosed with autistic spectrum dissorder, what is this meant to explain?

  • and l'm proud of it and Know what!? Satoshi Tajiri has it and he created Pokemon!

  • If you think that vaccines cause autism, the I thin you are RETARDED! I have Asperger 's and I got a 3.72 on my GPA last semester! and got high honors!!

  • XMRV retrovirus.

    See the stunning research by The Whittemore Peterson Institute published in "Science" October 2009.

    4% of the apparantly healthy population may have this retrovirus which is found at much higher incidence in people with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia and Autism.

    4% of children should NOT have the MMR until further research is done.

  • Why is it that the whole world has decided to act like dumba***s because of correlational data...

    If I did a study where I showed that the vast majority of children who get cancer were breastfed does that mean that breastfeeding causes cancer? NO! CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION!!!!

    Autism diagnoses have increased because the psychological standards that define autism have expanded.

  • Wrong... There is too much data to support that certain individuals, can not properly eliminate mercury from their system.

  • "eliminate mercury from their system?" What does that even mean, do you know what the LD50 is? Do you know what LD50 means? Do you know how much of ANY heavy metal is needed to be toxic? You know how much more mercury there is in sushi, salmon, drinking water? I mean it isn't hard...LOOK AROUND you live in a world covered in heavy metals, so why vaccines?

  • you're right, mecury injected into you cant be bad for you because its in salmon.

  • Ok. So the mercury is out, and has been out, for sometime...

    WHY ISN'T THE NUMBER GOING DOWN?

    Dumbest doctor ever!

  • Mercury is not out. YOU get educated.

    You are the dumbest!!!!!

  • @jbsill01 Yeah the doctor who originally said vaccines cause autism was deregistered for falsifying results. All these people blame MMR for autism. It's bullshit. I never had MMR. I have Aspergers - and I nearly died from mumps. This guy should be shot.

  • What works? I was looking at OxySilver website. One testimonial says "Gulf War Syndrome - All Symptoms Gone!" I think GWS was due to all the vaccines given to the troops. also check out "Governing Entities" at soisnessdotorg. need to read it a bit for it to sink in. Very empowering. Skyrockets your intuition and things just fall into place. "May your life be blessed with synchronicities and loving encounters."

  • You are retarded, so much so...it's offensive.

  • People generally 've a tendency to believe whatever crap that is propagated by a so-called Scientist without even questioning it or checking facts. As a result, 'Scientist', 'Research', 'Study', etc. have become buzz words which wen channeled thru propaganda machines gets freely passed into the human minds without being filtered. Hence, the gross ignorance of the general public. And the global elites are enslaving the ignorant mass even by using the 'scientific' community.....

  • Brain tissue can be repaired with urine therapy, since urine contain tiny brain cell fragments.

    It takes a full year to grow a new brain using urine therapy..

    See the video: paul8kangas

  • If you want to embed an iHealthTube video, you can get the code from the iHealthTube website.

  • Wow, that must be why you hear mostly about autistic boys :( There are actually some doctors who claim they are reversing the effects of autism with diet, because sometimes it happens to their own children.

  • Great info, this guy is the man

  • God bless this doctor!

    People working with children in Israel have noticed the staggering increase in cancers, autism and retardation.

    The Israeli medical profession says little about it except for an intrepid few specialists who have a site detailing the dangers of mercury, other toxins and contaminants in vaccines.

  • 1 in 160 children are autistic to some extent or other in the US?

    I think I heard that here in Israel it's 1 in 250. It used to be 1 in 20,000.

  • yeah, In the US its 1 in 150,

    It was 1 in 10,000 twenty years ago. So whats that leave in another 20 years?

  • 1,000,000 more doctors increasing the autism spectrum and over diagnosing developmental disorders such as ADD/ADHD. Listen, you can't just throw facts like that around...it is dangerous and you are part of the problem.

    DOES ANYONE ON YOUTUBE OWN A BOOK?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more