There are many errors in this pseudo-documentary or beginning of a bad quality documentary: and it sounds like propaganda for the «wonderful etruscans»- though many questions are unanswered, and by people who use the Latin alphabet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
@IdelUralState well "rome" is vague....rome had many eras, and times when the city was built, destroyed, and rebuilt. and added upon.....so i wouldnt say they built rome but they did lay down some ground work.
Agglutination is a typological feature and does not imply a linguistic relation, but there are some families of agglutinative languages. For example, the Proto-Uralic language, the ancestor of Uralic languages, was agglutinative, and most descended languages inherit this feature. But since agglutination can arise in languages that previously had a non-agglutinative typology and it can be lost in languages that previously were agglutinative.
Agglutination as a typological trait cannot be used as evidence of genetic relationship to other agglutinative languages.
Languages tend to change over the centuries, but the root of the words are still obvious. The language of the Etruscans is intelligible to Europeans, Etruscans were Trojans, just like most Europeans, Latin Romans, Celts, Illyrians-Illines-Hellenes, just like ancient writings tell about the Anatolian-Trojan-Lydian origins of the Etruscans.
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
@anyone28 This clip is from "Rome - Power and Glory" and it's all they had on the Etruscans. The only doumentary I know of that exclusively deals with the Etruscans is an episode of "Ancient Mysteries" called "Hidden Cities of the Etruscans" from 1996. It's hard to get hold of, though...
Well, they didn't teach the Romans "everything."
stamman2 3 weeks ago
There are many errors in this pseudo-documentary or beginning of a bad quality documentary: and it sounds like propaganda for the «wonderful etruscans»- though many questions are unanswered, and by people who use the Latin alphabet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
gs032009 1 month ago
etruscan=turk
erdal0 1 month ago
grazie,splendido...
carlotta306 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
IdelUralState 3 months ago
The good news is etruscans have relatives the seclers in Transilvania.Look at their alphabet.
jacobsczgmail 3 months ago
what is wrong with that guys nose
btrflymamma 5 months ago
ETRUCIANS WERE NOT EUROPEAN!
THEIR LANGUAGE WAS AGGLUTINATIVE!
They built rome but that's it, they are not related to any european country!
zzeynepp18 5 months ago
@zzeynepp18 ...uhhh they didnt build rome....they were from tuscany north of rome.
mrtundra45 4 months ago
@mrtundra45
They build Rome. This is fact, read books.
IdelUralState 3 months ago
@IdelUralState They started to build EARLY rome in BC era...they did not build rome as we know it as the Roman empire......idiot.
mrtundra45 3 months ago
@mrtundra45 I did not assert the opposite xD idiot?
IdelUralState 3 months ago
@IdelUralState well "rome" is vague....rome had many eras, and times when the city was built, destroyed, and rebuilt. and added upon.....so i wouldnt say they built rome but they did lay down some ground work.
mrtundra45 3 months ago
@mrtundra45 exactly , thats the point
IdelUralState 3 months ago
@zzeynepp18
Agglutination is a typological feature and does not imply a linguistic relation, but there are some families of agglutinative languages. For example, the Proto-Uralic language, the ancestor of Uralic languages, was agglutinative, and most descended languages inherit this feature. But since agglutination can arise in languages that previously had a non-agglutinative typology and it can be lost in languages that previously were agglutinative.
DonJeta0007 4 months ago
@zzeynepp18
Agglutination as a typological trait cannot be used as evidence of genetic relationship to other agglutinative languages.
Languages tend to change over the centuries, but the root of the words are still obvious. The language of the Etruscans is intelligible to Europeans, Etruscans were Trojans, just like most Europeans, Latin Romans, Celts, Illyrians-Illines-Hellenes, just like ancient writings tell about the Anatolian-Trojan-Lydian origins of the Etruscans.
DonJeta0007 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DonJeta0007
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
IdelUralState 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zzeynepp18
"That the Etruscans were Turanians, and that they belonged to the North Turanian or Altaic branch of the Turanian stem, cannot be denied."
(Victoria Institute (Great Britain), Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute, Or Philosophical Society of Great Britain , Band 10, BiblioBazaar, 2009, p.200)
IdelUralState 3 months ago
Thank you for posting.
LoveThatRebecca 6 months ago
can you tell me please the name of the documentary from which you took this clip?:D
anyone28 1 year ago
@anyone28 This clip is from "Rome - Power and Glory" and it's all they had on the Etruscans. The only doumentary I know of that exclusively deals with the Etruscans is an episode of "Ancient Mysteries" called "Hidden Cities of the Etruscans" from 1996. It's hard to get hold of, though...
eIectrostatic 1 year ago 2