God is foolish. "A denial theory to existence of the absolute being"

[HouzanSuzuki]

_____EOism vs Theology______

[Houzan03Education]

1- I don't know what people of religion or theological scholars or believers want to depend on, the concept of "unique and absolute one" which they adore is one of the worst "gossip" or "big lie" in ten thousand years. 2- However, I don't deny so-called Devas (Nature Spirits), I also don't deny the existence of intelligent entities with no body who are mid-level managers in various dimensions. Obviously, I don't deny life in outer space.

[Houzan03Education]

3-

I discuss the contradiction of the definition of

the absolute one who is said to "be in the top",

and about the reason of the existence if

he really exists.

And if such a "unique and absolute one exists",

I should say that it contradicts creatures esteeming

or respecting him.

[Houzan03Education]

4- Even if "God" existed in ancient times, there is no evidence that one "still exists now". From a certain aspect, "later creatures" obviously have quality. It is not proper logic that God "has more quality" than you because he existed in the beginning of the universe. It is illogical that one is major because one was in the beginning. It does not stand to reason that one is great or the ruler because one was in existence since the start of the universe.

[Houzan03Education]

5-

You human beings seem to have the bad habit of

personalizing everything as if it is same as you.

Why does God need to be human-like.

The cause of such thought or delusion is as follows.

It is the delusion that God who created the universe is

"above creatures in rank".

There is no reason that God who created the universe is

physically or intellectually "stronger" than you.

It is not always true that God can do what you can.

[Houzan03Education]

6- You usually make tools to do what you can't or what you don't want to do. Whoever creates tools, they always have the motivation of "making tools that serve a purpose for themselves". Moreover, the products which act for their creators always "need to have superiority over creators in their use". Thus compared to creatures in the functional aspect, God is defined as being impotent or "being almost impotent". This is the essential. God is "clumsy" or "moron".

[Houzan03Education]

7-

True predominant species or higher existences don't

indicate "being earlier in terms of time".

In other word, there is completely no basis that

God is "great because of being in the beginning".

Next, higher existences don't indicate having

any superior powers.

In this way, it is redefined that God can't necessarily

do everything.

Additionally, it is not logical that God made everything.

[Houzan03Education]

8-

For example, there is nothing strange if

"the creation robot" which is made by God created this

universe and is controlling it.

There is no basis that "God made anything and everything"

of the universe.

Even if the universe has the first objective,

there is no evidence that it has been upheld until now.

It is highly likely that the universe has already set

another objective.

[Houzan03Education]

9- We absolutely don't need to adore God. What in the world does presently sustains the fatherhood of God? Only the threat that sustains the fatherhood is assumedly one ability which is left to God. He may be "Shitty old man" who is Nine hundred billion years old, being ready to push the button, and saying "Hey, I can break this universe and your enjoyable life at any time!" Then, the last allegation of God is this: "I do imagine in the universe."

[Houzan03Education]

10-

In the first place, why can't God stop imagining?

God seems to be restless infant who escapes boredom.

Then, there could be the hypothesis that the universe is

"the by-product of killing God's boredom".

[Houzan03Education]

11-

Each outline is as follows.

(1) God might exist in the beginning, but "there is no evidence for existing now".

(2) God is "not especially great even if one exists in the beginning".

(3) There is no evidence for the superiority of God's capability.

(4) God did not necessarily create all things.

(5) God is not necessarily controlling the universe.

[Houzan03Education]

12-

(6) God might be just thinking of how one kill one's everlasting boredom, or might have thought it in past time, and might have already dropped dead, or vanished away.

(7) Then, there is a possibility that the universe has no objective now, and the intelligent entities who become obsessed with such an idea "I am the administrator" are controlling each universes with each arbitrary objective.

[Houzan03Education]

13-

(8) It is highly likely that God, if still exists, is a washed-up "idiot" who says "The universe is designed by me", and is suing patent-infringement-lawsuit.

(9) Or it is highly likely that God is an utter "bastard" who can only say "I can delete the universe at any time".

Thus God is foolish.

There is "logically" no evidence that

"that one" is great.

[Houzan03Education]

14- For example, there are countless industries which make no contribution to clothing, food and housing on the earth. They are completely unnecessary businesses only for existence. But once you engage in them it becomes commonplace, then you will forget this basic query. That is to say,"Do we need such a business in the first place?" On our planet earth there is the monetary system, so not the energy itself but the form of guaranty which can be exchanged for the energy is called money.

[Houzan03Education]

15-

Actually, even if the food supply is globally decreasing,

we tend to think we can get along with the money,

and foolishly deceive ourselves.

But because of this misconception,

for increasing just the form of guaranty as a money

or increasing just the digital numeric number as a deposit, there are countless unneeded industries which have nothing to do with clothing, food and housing.

[Houzan03Education]

16- Now then, leaving such a company of essentially completely needless industry, recovering ourselves and thinking, the query is this. When we engage in it we think It has its own meaning, but what kind of meaning does this industry itself have in the first place? Then, let us hurl "the same question" at God. The whole universe does exist, so maintaining it and surviving are the common activities of each living being in it.

[Houzan03Education]

17- But, what kind of value or obligation or objective does the existence of this industry or company as the universe have? That is to say, the dog like God will lose its existence value by a ward. The word is, "Without the universe, there is no matter." ＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋＋ From Mumyouan's Book " Irony on Spirituality " __Stupid Gods of the universe__ by EO 1994