Siskel & Ebert @ David Letterman #2, 1991, Part 1 of 2

[GlengarryGlennBeck]

6:45 fatasses offended in the audience.

[Ingratiateful]

4:54 - Siskel gets ready to lay down some awesome shit.

4:55 - Siskel stands down, patiently and politely.

5:00 - Siskel realizes that his awesome shit is, indeed, going to triumph.

5:41 - Siskel begins laying down some awesome shit.

[IamConnorMacLeod]

Siskel was right. Blue Velvet was great..

I miss him.

[calebengler]

I agree with Roger. Watched Blue Velvet recently again and it was laughably terrible.

[RottyAngel]

I miss Siskel. I really liked him. Even though I thought Blue Velvet stunk too, lol.

One of those artsy fartsy films that only certain people "get" I suppose. lol.

[jjay75]

@RottyAngel No, its just fucking cool

[SKrizal]

Hahahaha what a great video! Thanks for uploading! This was hilarious!

:D So happy right now :)

[guidedbyalan]

I love the high-five. Heartwarming.

[guidedbyalan]

I think they rotate who sits closer to Letterman each year! Check out the videos.

[guidedbyalan]

On purpose, is what I'm getting at. If you hear the debates about the order of their names in the show title, it's not impossible.

[YouDickwod]

fuck your mother

[stokepogue]

This is when Letterman went goofy and never returned.

[juffan]

i didnt like blue velvet either, but i remember it i guess.

[godfatherofwiseguys]

i want to see their review of Apocalypse Now... 2/3 of the movie was very very good for me. with the brando scenes, i wasw thinking in my head, wtf is this?

[kolst8406]

This is June 13th, 1991. On his blog today, Ebert has a remembrance of Siskel.