SABAI CHAAN NEPAL MA MOUNT EVEREST, BUDDHA NI JANMEKO, HIMALAYA, MAHENDRA GUFA, SABAI CHAAN ABBA NEPALI JANTA AGADI BADAU, HISTORY MATRAI RAMRO BHAYERA HUDAINA... LETS CHANGE NEPAL... LETS DEVELOP NEPAL....
Firstly, your sentences are not written in appropriate grammar, so it's not clear what you are trying to say. Secondly, i am not sure if you have read carefully of what I have written because your so called reply seems to be just an unrelated racial stir. If you can't reply to my comments appropriately then please don't bother because the point I have made is a very valid one indeed.
@rishav79 hey dhoti go to english school if you can't understand english. or go and learn kirati language so i can explain to you much better. finally use chopstick to eat ok. don't use hand....disgusting.
Just like western Europeans stole the image of Jesus Christ to an appeasing blonde hair, blue eyed scandanavian looking male despite the fact he was Aramaic. Likewise The Buddha's Mongolian image has been created to appease the majority of his followers. He was a Hindu crown prince name Siddhartha Gautum, his language was Sanskrit based therefore Indo-Aryan on origin.
buddha was a mongoloid oriental neplese born in lumbini nepal. india wants to steal thousands of pilgrims to their country so the falsely claim buddha was born in india.
if buddha was born india then,why dont millions of buddhist goes to visit india rather then nepal....why would all those country like s.korea,china,france ,tailand,bhutan,japan,manang build there pilgrims in lumbini nepal...so think that dhootis
i wonder why buddhism is written in sanskrit/pali and not in nepali. why anchient chinese and japanese had to travel to india to learn buddhism. why tibetan in 7th bc had to invite indian guru to teach buddhism when calling a nepalian would have been easier as nepal is closer to tibet. anyway, it is stupid to fight over where lord buddha is born, it is more important where he resides. lord buddha resides where his teachings are followed. india & nepal are hindu majority country.
@pythonjibraltar still today in the 21st century my people are being discriminated in india.
watch this video --> The Kiratas In Modern India: Discriminated in their own home
if indian likes to discriminate mongoloid northeast indian, then it is better for northeast indian to demand separate and independent nation from india. voice out.
@pythonjibraltar Lord Buddha was from Shakya community. Shakya are Mongoloid race.
Define Mongoloid race?
Mongoloid - The maximum people of this race are found in areas of Himalayas like Nepal, Assam, and Burma (Myanmar) . Broad head, average height ,round face, yellow skin, small and flat nose, and small eyes are some common traits of this race.
Still hard to believe. I welcome you to Nepal and visit Shakya town in Kathmandu and see their appearance.
honestly isn't it time to modify our culture and cultural beliefs according to time? why do we disagree against each other simple why don't we just give one new religion known as Nepalism? if you love Nepal you are following it, live for Nepal and Nepali die for Nepal and Nepali.
@TaMaGuRaLi I'm not even Indian.....but I learned and believed that he was an Indian descendant because he was an Indo Aryan...(Indo Aryans came from India to Nepal right )and what about the curly hair? people of mongoloid race do not have curly hair I guess...but I've seen Indian people with curly hair...so he probably looked like an indian person with aryan origin...and of course it is fair to say he was a nepali with Indian origin :)
khashai culture ta sabaiko culture nai hola ma ta sabai cutureko respect garchuu umm kirati culture hide bhaye ni truth nikle tyo truth nai sabai hune aaunu parcha culture ra historyma bhedbhau rakhnu hunna any way tara yasko naamma divide garnu hunna tyo chahi cha ok cheers
In order for Nepal to have its own distinctive identity away from India, following must be taken by the Nepalese.
Buddha was born in Nepal and so the New Constitution of Nepal must make Buddhism as national religion of Nepal. More importantly Nepalese need to distinguish Hinduism.
Hinduism= Brahmanical religion + Kirati religion.
Nepalese must shift from Brahmanical religion towards Kirati religion. Kirat religion is more of worshiping of mother nature, land and ancestors.
@pzya1 yes pzya1 we are nepalese but diliprai is not wrong either. he's trying to tell the world the truth. as we all know that nepal history was written by hindu rulers and his government. many historical reference to Kirat are hidden and only today these truth is coming out. In Nepal school, teacher always do not want to elaborate on Kirat history. The book too give small refernce to Kirat then says nothing is known about them and goes onto Licchavis, Thakuris and so on.
@TaMaGuRaLi look bro india was so and is so wrong...at the time buddha was born it was Indian subcontinent there wasn't any nepal...u know that...now lumbini belongs to nepal....so i dont know what to say he is nepalese or indian...if he had given nationality ..probably he would get indian passport....thats fact...but now lumbini is nepal and nepal has full right to say siddhartha gautam was born in nepal...note; not buddha ...he became buddha at india...seriously i hate india and its gov too
Citizens of the World, the Indians claimed Buddha was born in India based on their ancient map. The ancient India was known as Bharatvarsha. But they forgot that Nepal was then known as Kiratdesh. They need to look deep into their own vedic books as Kiratdesh is listed as one of the 56 ancient kingdom.
In short,
Bharatvarsha ---> India
Kiratdesh ---> Nepal
check this video ---> "Kiratas:the Himalayas Race"
and you have better understanding of Nepal, culture and people of the Himalayas.
@diliprai yeah am saying the same thing...but does lumbini lies at kiratdesh??? bro look i dont have time for ur all this history things...i could like ur info about kirat but now am getting pissed off,,,,i dont care about my history why should i care about urs...that nepal was kirat desh and all??? i give a damn.
@latescarface21 said " i dont care about my history why should i care about urs...that nepal was kirat desh and all???"
then why are you here claiming Buddha was born in India? If you don't give a damn care about your history, then please don't give false information to the world that he(Buddha) was born in India.
@diliprai i am not saying he was born in india....at that time there wasn't any nepal and neither india..did kiratdesh covered lumbhini??? u said kirats used to rule Himalayas so???? lumbhini is in terai...i am nepalese and i proud to be nepalese...for me all people are equal aint like u aryans and mongolians and all...i just wanted to say that...siddhartha gautam was born in lumbhini(in present nepal) and became Buddha in boydhgaya(in present india)
latescarface21, Bottom line although Lord Buddha attained enlightenment in India, his birth place is in Nepal. And yes the Kiratdesh covered all the Himalayas region from Nepal and Northeast India of Assam, Sikkim, Nagaland, Tripura per the vedic scriptures and books.You need to read more sources and not only depend so much information from Nepali teachers who are trained to spread in championing Hindu-Aryan civilization. The Himalayas region(Kiratdesh) is Mongoloid race civilization.
@diliprai you know mite...latescarface was somehow right but i agree with you too...but i want to know who and how do we know that he is aryan and other is mongoloid ???? if any mongoloid got married with aryan then their chikd would be what>>>???>>>> in this 21st century u are talking about this stupid things...aryans and mongoloid of nepal is like strength...when they are together even british couldn't rule US...nor nepalese aryans ran from india and we kirats lost war with aryans...
@diliprai and matter of fact as far as i know...and we used to read in books too..siddhartha gautam got source of en-light from nepal and became buddha in india now say where he was born literally speaking???? i too used to get piss off when i used hear this but later on my teacher(chandra shakya, social teacher, L.A.S, hattiban lalitpur) told me in CHAT this things and i support him
@latescarface21 yes it is true that Lord Buddha got enlightenment in India.
The place where Siddhartha Gautama got enlightenment or nirvana was in a village call Uruvela, in the state of Bihar, India. This place is now better known as Bodh-Gaya. It is believed that Siddhartha Gautama became Buddha mediating under the pipal tree. "Because it was under this tree that he was to find enlightenment, it is called the Bodhi-tree (Tree of Enlightenment) and is revered by Buddhists everywhere.
@white0dove well brother sir!!! u are educated and bit of historian but i have never heard about this tsang...can u give me some link...well bro we gurkhas were rajput but now we are known as nepali, u believe??dont ya??? bro well last but not the least...thanks for extra history...u read about my country's history..no one said thanks for that...well it was pleasure meeting u, i definitely read about sikh history in very short period of time, long live ur Sikh's guru and JAI NEPAL
@latescarface21 try reading cast and tribes of ancient india , I dont remember the author, try reading guide to taxila by john hubert marshall, or go to british library site and check for their online catalogue I am sure you will find abundant books on ancient history including nepal and what is the link between gorkhas and rajputs and jatts. Good luck with your search! Hueng Tsang was an ancient historians we read about him since class 3 till class 12! search him on google!
@latescarface21 its wierd I tried posting a site for history bt couldnt check your messages have sent you a site to check Gorkha and Nepal history, good luck!
Not only Buddha originated in Nepal, Sivaism too have it origin in Nepal. check this video --> "KIRAT: A bridge between Nepal - Mongolia revealing the origin of Sivaism"
and the light will be shed. That's why you see Siva always resting above the Himalayas. He is from the Himalayas race(Kirat).
@latescarface21. isn't it so funny that Indians always claim that Buddha was born in India. Neolithic tools found in the Kathmandu Valley, Dang and Sikkim proved that Mongoloid ethnicity have been living in the Himalayan region for past 10,000 years. The findings of these neolithic tools can be found on
---> "Archaeological Activities in Nepal Since 1893 AD To 2002 AD" by Prakash Darna
I agree with diliprai that Indians are NOT Mongoloid race so how come they even think of owing Nepal.
@white0dove cheers bro...thank you...well bro british are from cold places...so they were fed up staying at hot as hell in india..so they were so keen to colonise nepal...well bro thats why they did maldives....and at that time nepal was full of gold left by lichivi, malla and kirats...they did try to colonise brother but like american lost war at Vietnam coz of lack of geographical knowledge so did britsh too...
I agree with your video description. It is true and sad at the same time. India being a giant has the tendency to overwhelm its much smaller neighbors and their history. Mohenjadaro or indus civilization existed in a region which is in pakistan but its always associated with india. Similarly budda was born in kartikdesa or nepal but its always associated with india. As an indian we should not undermine or twist hisotric facts under the patriotic umbrella.
@Rohit84up are you serious? very important part of Indus valley was found in Patiala, Punjab, India. It is in Pakistan and India. you cant categorize it like that. The reason India is mentioned is cause the pakistan site is more under bombs than scientists. It is sad about the movie, but please don't twist history and historical findings like that. Its found in India and Pakistan.
@ white0dove bro now i dont want to talk to you anymore at last let me tell you...write to anyone,may be u could say me stubborn or arrogant..but i dont feel proud of being part of india.. i dont hate india but i feel proud of being nepalese...u can count that u won and i lost...but nepal was free country and is...am proud of being free man of free country...well al last bro enjoy ur common wealth game...peace be upon india....and its from my heart...remember dont reply..u won i lost
@latescarface21 why do people when know they are wrong and arguin uselessly say I wont reply anymore? I understand your sentiments but maybe you should read more, go out of Nepal and read, not in India but somewhere else! I know how you feel cause these irritating scientist say even I am not Indian cause my ancestors came from somewhere else well!! But it doesn't mean history is wrong.I aint in India right now so well but have a nice day, i aint replying uselessly now, read more.....
@latescarface21 sorry I cant control from replying I have no hard feelings here so well, I dint reply to win, I just like to have knowledge, get it and give it, Peace.
@ white0dove and yeah india didnt bow??? bro look at size of indian and nepal...britian was cunning country at that time if they could win ur country then why they didnt use their force to won nepal and make them slave like they did to other country??? i know u say some emotional drama answer..lol but history book says u lost the war..didnt say why or how...u may have inter reason for that coz u know well than history coz u are native...history say u became slave and all...
@latescarface21 lol dont say why and how? lol must be Nepali history book :P cause I read a lot and there is a lot of history!!! and punjab never gave in, until few of dumb people acted like nepalese and supported britishers, that is how we lost the war! there is special history fr that 40 soldiers against 400! a TRUE one! Please advise your library to have books, and if you say about london just go and see british museum or national history or british library, books are abundant!
@ white0dove i just know that am nepalese...and we create diff history, we fought with british...neither we lost nor we won...both of them wanted to have treaty and did...bro read the deep history of nepal..ur so called gurung gotra, magar...even tharu of nepal had fought equally at war...so i do mix up and say gurkha was not rajput beacause what about their sacrifice at that war???
@ white0dove i never feel proud of being khas... i feel proud being nepalese... i feel proud when i see gurkha statue in middle of the london...i feel superior when anyone ask me weather ur country was colonized by british and i reply NO...brother whoever u are..historian or sikh or whatever...or u stick nepal to rajput or whatever nobody gives shit...i just wanted to say i even dont believe in diliprai even he's nepali, u are sikh, i give a shit and i dont want to know ur history too...
@latescarface21 as for colonisation I dont think there was any good in colonising Nepal, there wasnt much to offer, except army and weapons which the Nepalese heartly supported britishers and so britishers did not need to colonise them, cause they got what they wanted, Nepal never uprose against the british demand that is the reason in world history there is only one country listed as not having been taken over by another people besides british and that is not Nepal! Go check yourself!
@ white0dove bro u are amazing. gorakhnath shah??? where did u read this??? ok i really used to rely on indian books but from today NO...hahahaha he was god...and bro have u ever been to gorkha??? coz i have been...i dont know who is this idiot wrote abt nepalese history but gorkha must relate with gurung coz gurungs are native of gorkha, i dont know abt rajput or whatever, or from punjab and i give a shit...am proud of being nepalese and my history starts from nepal....
@latescarface21 just because you are from Nepal does not qualify you as a historian and its not an Indian book, its written by chinese and british historians, like tsang, have you heard of him? I dont think so, so please shutup until you read more.
@latescarface21 as for Gorkha statue, the british recognised them as martial race, just as they recognised rajput and jatts, you should be proud and I am happy for you, and yes Gurungs are all gorkhas, but all gorkhas are not gurungs, so you after all accept what I said. good!
This video is stupid and the comments here are worse, if you really want some real discussion on FACTS message me, else talk to diliprai and other people like him here.
@white0dove well bro dont believe to diliprai...he is poison...hate creates hate...i dont like indian government policy against nepal, that i say openly...they are ruining our country....but i have many indian friends in london,believe me they are so nice to me..they say we are from neighbouring country.bro if u give respect then u get too, u know why these nepali ppl against u? coz u are interferin in our history and they think u are another ppl like indian gov...and i am too against diliprai
@latescarface21 ummm actually u r right,if we have unity tha are samen india nepal food,talking way n many culture match,besides india n nepal in any world nation while they meet they become fren too.hate create in nepal specially because of border enroachment.but we not sure but media show india enroaching border n interfaring nepali politics,any way infact because of english we all india pakistan nepal get suffer,hamara asali dushman in my opinion
@latescarface21 being khas does not mean you are superior or destined to be king, there were many non-khas kings in Indian history and people from punjab who denied the caste system! As for Nepal I have nothing against it, I have shouting that Buddha was born there, and as for problems, what you think abt us , we are depicted abt you, so its not clear whether its the media or the politics, I just replied here cause I wanted the history right, specially one which relates to me! Have a nice day :)
@white0dove sikh was sikh and is...even they fight under christian and if anyone says that all sikh group during war was christian then how would u feel??? angry..wouldn't u??? even u know commander was christian...nd thapa, pandey( Kshatriya), bista arent rajput for sure...they are Khas...and they used be the commander, i like indian history too. knew lil knowledge but dont want to say anything coz aint indian and u people know what is correct history than books so do we. i think u understood..
@latescarface21 I think you dont understand the reason castes were created and why they mean nothing to me. Gurung is a gotra, not a caste. I cant explain the stupid hindu technicality but you cant mix Gorkha with gurung, or gorkha with sikh, Gorkha is a race, sikh is a religion while gurung is a gotra, now if people fight in an army its diff but when people fight for religion its diff, when people fight as a race for land its diff! now you understand?
@latescarface21 btw since you so up for rajputs, let me tell you, they are genetically just an uprooted branch of jatts and so are the jats, there is no diff except that rajputs adopted hinduism and were given land in return and political power by brahmins and a high caste, but genetically and proven by scienctist ,they along with jat, are the bloodlines of the jatts( from Punjab) which is a race and not a caste as often mistaken by people around the world!!!
@white0dove well bro one simple question...if u are good in history then gorkahli armies were gurung, magar and khas( Kshatriya) at first, weren't they??? later on kirat joined...former was shah(so called rajput) but does it mean gorkhali was rajput??? lets say many sikh fought along with british in 1 and 2nd word war under british captain or whatever now were all sikh christian??? i guess NO...u cant say gorkha army was rajput
@latescarface21 First of all Gorkhali is an Indian word but had no historical refrence, secodnly Kirats were never hindu, they have mongol links. Shah was not kirat. the person Gorakhnath he was in a smadh when a certain person a shah, stayed with him as a devotee and the saint said he will be called a gorkha : the one with valour and vigour, the saint was a rajput, and so his disciples came from him, were also rajput. Now stop saying it an army, it happened before britishers came!
@latescarface21 now you will say britishers came much before 1700,but not to himalayas, because they had to first win the sikh war! before shahs, kirats had small kingdoms, Gorakhnath shah awoke from his meditation and decided to unite all kingdoms and make a nepal! He was a rajput, secodnly stop saying kshatriya shit, we are talking about races here not castes, Gorkha is a race not a cast, while Gurung is not a race. Fighting in a british army is different, its organised and people join it
@latescarface21 but getttin together your race and making an army of GORKHAS by a Gorkha is different. No matter who fights, truth is the leader made it possible, who was a rajput, because of this dominance,later Nepal had more hindus and less buddhists, earlier than that the whole area stretched till afghanistan was buddhists!! And my forefather fought in world war 1 and 2 and it was nothing like fighting for your own land or race, or nation!!! and stop saying Gorkhali lol its ruins everything!
@latescarface21 you are mixing religion, with race and mixing caste with race! People can be mongol but are christian or muslim or buddhists are same time! They can be diff surname does not mean they are not mongol. Kashatriya was created by brahmins, it wasnt even dipicted in present form in the vedas, it had diff significance, Gorkha is not a caste, its a race. When sikh fought under britishers it was an army, but people fighting in the sikh war 1 and 2 were all jatts, that was a race!
@white0dove hmmm...impressive....brother...am Kshatriya, rana are not from shah well shah might be rajput but rana was like post before rana they were kunwar...i studied that in books i dont know what u read???? first rana pime minister ofnepal was junga bahdur rana, he was kunwar too before...aint have hard feelins about india, yeah at time gorkha was hindhu for sure, only later on people changed to buddhism...
@latescarface21 hmmm no they were all buddhist before and later changed to hindu, you facts are pretty lame. And rana which was in Nepal came after shahs, he was no prince, he murdered the royals as he himself had no right to reign directly. Hmmm I think you should read more!
@white0dove by the way gorkha is not a name of army force...it is gorkhali or gurkha...gorkha is palce or kingdom of prithivi naryan shah from where he started war against other small country...but as a matter of fact, since some hindhu were at the top level, it doesnt mean gorkhali were proper hindhu...pun, magar, gurung had fought along with them...where most of them are buddhist...it was lets say mixed up army but they were gorkhali, and nepali rana and kunwas dont belong to rajputs
@sudhan16502 you history is very poor my friend. First of all I never said armed forces. Secondly Saint Gorakhnath Created the word GORKHA, thirdly he was hindu, and lastly shah dynasty were his disciples decendants. hmm read more before blabbering. It has got nothing to do with hindu,neither am I one. and Gurung is a gotra, stop mixing it with gorkhas. That is the main reason present Nepal has more Hindus, cause the guy who started its unification was a rajput, case closed.
@White0Dove said "Saint Gorakhnath Created the word GORKHA,....and Gurung is a gotra, stop mixing it with gorkhas" Indians claims
-that Lord Buddha was born in India and was Hindu Aryan.
-Mt. Everest is located in India
and now Gorkha and Gurung also originated in India. LMAO!!!
Indians are dirty and corrupted by birth.
The only Indian invented was Aryan race, caste system, sati system(burning of widow), dowry system, corruption, money laundering, terrorism, human trafficking, AIDs, etc
@diliprai are you demented? seriously did you knock your head somewhere? India never said Mt Everest is in India, only an idiot like you will say so, and I am not repeating that Buddha was not a hindu and not an Indian, sigh! its futile talking to you I am not wasting my precious time on you anymore, you are a certified hate breeder. First get your history right, second get a mental check up done! Third none of the things you state here are true: none, India did not invent Aryan race, or others.
@diliprai well I aint replying anymore, you freak. go sleep peacefully cause I wont be stating fact anymore,add as much fiction you want and make a sick film out of it!
@sudhan16502 There is no term as gorkhalis lol you mixing puns in too! Oh my dear god! Next you will say Gorkhas are mongols and that huns were too in Nepal! Go read more, and shush until you know more. Nepali rana lol ranas came after the shah, he actually killed the king and his brother to be kind hmmm he was the wasir, which you dont knw, well, I dont have time to explain more!
@white0dove...yeah i know that...but at that time there was no nepal...NEPAL no NEPAL...u said whatever betn china and india, did anyone mention nepal, before nepal there was many small country within modern nepal...later they unified into Nepal...and never got colonize by any other country...thats whaat am proud of, not for being part of rajput or anyone...now what then???i dont know what we are getting from this arguement???
@sudhan16502 when your so called Nepal was never colonized cause they pledged allegiance with britishers, to help them whenever they could, provide food and men for battle, which the Indians did not bow to and hence the battle ensued, there was only one indo-gorkha war, after which britishers recognized Nepal as a nation in 1924. hmmm actually all gorkhas are rajputs :) lol sorry but its true. Dont worry I am not rajput. The argument is people calling names at India without a reason.
@white0dove bruv well done...yeah i know hinduism,buddhism and sikh are all from india...that true, i never said buddha wasnt from india just wanted to say sidhartha was born in lumbini which is now in nepal...and became buddha in india...well u are mistaken nepal was never ruled by anyone except shah..may be they had some part but not modern NEPAL...if u find any link modern nepal was ruled by gupta or whatever..lemme know...there wasnt any nepal before shah...thank you (:
@sudhan16502 go look in history books yourself. Start reading about Chandragupta II he took over what ever was left between china and India, including the Kiratas, which includes the mordern day Nepal, he defeated all the hindukush,kiratas,kinnaras ot include into proper India. As started by his father Chandragupta. I can only refer a book to you if you can find: Raghu Vamsa v 4.60-75
my reply was to reference of India being conquered, I think people need to know more about Nepal history before spitting out venom. Even the MODERN Nepal was recognized by Britishers only in 1924 so I don't know why it matters, I never said Buddha was born in India, we have learned since class 2 that he was born in Lumbini, but abusing another nation and people just on basis of a stupid flop movie is dumb and amounts to spreading of only hatred which I cannot understand, how it helps any cause?
@sudhan16502 personally I am very proud of my history with so many diversities entering India and enriching its culture because of which my own family had indo-Greek and indo-Scythian ancestors and I don't see how it is bad? genetically everyone is related to each other so I don't feel anyone is inferior or superior. Whoever put this video clearly lacks the way to deal with a problem and believed in spreading of racism and hatred, lastly I believe with such rich history India is a rich country.
As for anyone who thinks Nepal was never ruled by anyone, it was under the influence of the Mauryan Empire and later became a vassal state under the Gupta Empire , you know like one who never dares fight and whenever required gave military assistant to the dominant state. if you need more history contact me. have a nice day :)
Nepal Developed on its own... it was never build up by any British or India or China. Though they helps us but we Nepalese are never a parasite on them as India used to be parasitic dependent on Britain. So you British followers stop claiming the false fact that Buddha was born in India and stop building false kapilbastu in India..
The Sutta Lakkhan, describes the Shakya, whom the Gautma Buddha was born into as "those yellow-skinned, soft and delicate as the bronze, his dark hair and slanted eyes and black" (dialogues of the Buddha, Part III p.138)
Now this clearly tells you Shakya ethnic group was Mongoloid race before as still today in Nepal and clearly proved you wrong that Buddha was indeed Mongoloid race.
@trapgyal1 nepal is nevr under china. whatever it did it did on its own.. but the fact all know is india as it is in present was developed by britain.. so you all are under britain...
@TheF0rbiddenPrince haha u stupid biatch..im not an indian or im not even nepali..but im not gon tell u where im frm ..lol.;i know that nepal is a fuckin loser country..it always was..u ppl couldn't even make ur own sewing needle..lol..forget about the rest..by the way, i didn't say nepal is officially under china, but nepal is fully under ccp's influence and u can't run from them lol..u ppl r fucked for good.
@trapgyal1 fuck u. ur india is sucked by other people sometimes .,alexender rome.,ur mother raped by muslim n sisters raped by britain 4 centuries n u dont shy telling nepal under china control. idiot, nepal is d only nation un beatable by centuries,watch our ancient flag n watch ur 100 time pussy changing flag......whoever big dick come in world u people always have sucked but nepal is still unbeatable n free nation till now,
@shishir871 u must be thinking i was born yesterday hahaha..i thought i read somewhere that nepal made an agreement not to fight or get attacked by other nation something like that..haha ur country nepal the nepalis are so fuckin hilarious..they don't wanna get indulged in war coz they knows theyll get raped within minutes lol..hilarious..they can't even make their own sewing needle lol..independent for ever and still backward like shit..shame on u ppl calling nepal grt..lmfao
@trapgyal1 hahaha there is no such agreement, dont touch us,while ur hrihtik bullied nepal how many dhotis we killed in nepal remember. so think about nepal living dhotis ok. back ward,wats that look at ur bihar n many state how back are they,nepal is not most backward nation there r more back nation than it n wat about india, look at begger in traistaion, most begger living country,nagalaind eating dogs n rats,n u tell us back first see ur face in mirror
@trapgyal1 u know wat, indian begger can speak english it not cos india is forward but d fact is ur mother sucked thier dick so deeply u made it national language,in army minister home every where i saw indian speaking englishstep father n if u go i doubt do they understand hindi or not n ur train r made by english n u say nepal depending on other jaja tere deshko aajad huye aur apne paau pe khade huye65 saal bhi nahi huyee bada hi dependence ki baat karta hai. tie laga, english bol slaves
@trapgyal1 while i read indian history uhuhu i cry hahahaha after defeating tipusultaan how english raped every girl mother even ur grand mother,while watcing freedom movie english hanged u so much uff cant see dhotis like bats hanging trees.hahaha all d gold looted,every time english raped all sexy bitch of india,luckyy bastards,brih divided u in part n part.wat u think do u trust ur indian,they r divided n every where rebolution terrorism,its britain who ruined u fuckers so stop m. this movie
Over 5000+ years go our King Yalamber fought these Indian monsters. It is clearly written in the Mahabharata epic my Nepali brothers and sisters that Kirat army fought these Indian who were encroaching our land. It is known in that war that Cinas(chinese) helped Kiratas to protect Nepal sovereignty. But the Indians in order to be friendly with Nepalese, the Indians accepted Kirat religion as theirs.
@reway7 hello imbecile;;;i don't understand wha ur saying u.;u forgot ur daily dosis or something ...?? yeah independent my ass..this country is the biggest shame in the history of world. they could never make progress by themselves...;always got help from ouside countries..fucktards who beg for help everywhere in the world..lol..u ppl r the disgrace of himalayan people.this world will be a better place without you yellow monkeys.
@montoogom there wasn't a country called Nepal at that time. You are correct. There wasn't Nepal at that time. That time it was called Kiratdesh.
The term Nepal came to exist from 4th BCE.
Any by the way, Kiratas were never Hindus and still they are not Hindus. Kirat are Mongoloid race unlike Indian and so had different religion and practices away from vedic teachings. check the video i have link below.
Finally India was built by British so it is part of Britain.
@diliprai your history is very poor to say that India was 'built' by Britishers. I think you need to read a lot before saying anything. Half truth is more dangerous than a lie!!!
@White0Dove and as for your Kiratdesh, they wernt budhists either, they all practiced paganism just LIKE hinduism. sigh! you are just like a child, how old are you? 12?
@diliprai not mater what you say, Jainism, Budhism, Hinduism and Sikhism ORIGINATED from India. THAT IS A FACT, RUB IT ON YOUR FACE AND REMEMBER IT. Sadly if you people are Buddhists its sad you malign the very country which gave birth to your religion. Wonder what a great man like Gautam must think of you.
...and u are right history is history...live in present...but fellow...u said @diliprai that they gave nepal to hindhu kings??? and what about ur tribe gave it muslims??? they died!!! what would u expect in war??? party or treat??? killing and dieing is rule of war but what does matter is who stood till last and who felt down first...
by the way am also kirat but am proud they lost with hindhu kings...rathr than sikh or other...so till now we have been siniging our own national anthem...
Still today the Kirat have their original religion which is animistic. The Kirat worshiped land, nature and their ancestors. check the video => "Sakela~the greatest festival of Kirat people"
The term Nepal came to exist from 4th BCE. The vedic scriptures and other ancient texts mentioned the Himalayas region as Kiratdesh or land of Kiratas.
check the video ==> "Kiratas:The Himalayas Race" for better knowledge and clarification. And yes Buddha was Mongoloid race and was born in Nepal
@white0dove...brother u are sikh...respect for that...we nepalese tried to defeat you all sikh but couldnt...we were badly defeated...history says it lack of knowledge...and i admit that...no doubt ur tribes are warriors...but u know what but...we were never colonised by any other countries...our gorkhas had also died...alot...but still we keep our country free and independent
@kingkhan 2...and u know...u go to china...burma...or or SRILANKA...or thailand or japan...or korea...they say buddha was born in nepal...and u fucking idiot...what te fuck is that westerns???? who the hell are they??? did u forget ur country was fucked by them and took all away ur treasures...and still many indian live in uk...bullocks...u have no independent history so u dont like it!!! but we are proud of our history...
@kingkhan2...listen u motherfucker...i am nepalese and i havent said yet...coz i know siddhartha gautam was born in nepal but he became buddha in india...and its god...he is not nepalese or indian or of any countries...but the point is u fucker...what the hell u are saying about my countries cast??? and fuck you...dont you dare about saying anything about my country...ok lets dnt say abt past...and u know what...westerns are not an asian...
Also i heard that the indians used to purchase nepalese quality carpets, take out the tag and put indians tag in it and send overseas while puting nepalese tag on their low standard carpet, causng loss and shutting down of carpet factories in nepal. is that true or is it only a rumour?????????? any ideaa!!!!
Lord Gautam Buddha was born in Nepal, not india...... what do the indians thinks???/ being powerful than nepal doesn't mean they can say anything and spread the false rumour like that...... whatever they say but they can't change the fact that Gautam Buddha borned in Nepal.
Before there was india, nepal small towns were ruled by different kings. Yes no country has taken over Nepal unlike India. Yes India can be proud that British made what thay call India now. In India even today people shit around train tracks yes sharing a bidi. And finally to all Indians who comment here visit all parts of india then come and visit nepal and then write here which country is balanced beautiful and developed as a whole country untill then..........
isnt it sad diliprai if only the so called gorkhas had some guts like the punjabis in north they would have kept the nepal with them rather than submit to hindu kings, just like the 40 sikhs who fought till death even though they lost to muslim forces, well atleast they died trying?
people can say all they want to about history,what matter is what you do now for your religion and country, your blood wont rescue you and abusin and calling people names and their country bad will certainly wont!
I seriously don't know why this video was put up! I have been taught since I was 5 years old that Gautam Buddha was born in Lumbini and when he was in India in Bodhgaya he attained englightenment. If only he knew this would follow I am sure he would have stayed in Nepal to get enlightenment also LOL poor Buddha so much of Abuses to other people on his name. so much for being a buddhist lool
and how does it matter where he was born? LOL he attainted enlightenment in BODHGAYA, in INDIA end of discussion! maybe you should come to India and you will have sense in the tiny brain of yours.
@diliprai and how is it of any significance? being mongoloid is what supreme? I seriously dont know what is the fight here? if you really want to do something talk to people who made the movie, but I guess you dont have the money. There is nothing to claim, everyone knows, Buddha gained enlightenment in India lol and I dont see how caste or sati is related to this fact? and not to shy away from the fact that atleast 5 or more religions in the world originated from India.
@diliprai stop crying like a baby and do something for your country for once. As for Australians I dont give a damn, even Indians abuse Australians, and I still dont care its their problem who stay there and I dont. The fact remains that Buddha did not reach enlightenment in Nepal, your so called land, there must be something in India that he got enlightened here and started preaching here then go around the world. or you want some more history?
@diliprai ok let me teach you Nepali History. 1. Gorkhas are not Mongols,mongols are not gorkhas, since its clear now, Nepal was founded by Gorkha king who migrated to Nepal from India and for that read Gorkha history and how the name originated from a saint. 2. Tibetians were not all mongols and nor were Sakyas, the first documented contact between the mongols and Tibetians was in 1215. Nepal was founded BY Gorkhas. Nepal did not found Gorkhas ok, once again Gorkhas found Nepal not vice versa.
@diliprai and lastly Gorkhas were Hindus, no matter how much you deny the fact or shout it wont change,they were of rajput ehtnicity, that is why Nepal was established in 16th Century after the Rajput originated by the shahs. Gorkhas were not mongols, stop shouting it all around youtube. Whatever you are reading is poor research probably from wiki I guess. Maybe you should start reading the book: Caste and Tribes of ancient Asia or western and northern India, who migrated and formulated kingdoms
@diliprai shahs were purely Gorkhas, and Gorkhas purely Rajput and if you read Rajput history, well read it , they originated from Northwest India. Saint Gorakhnath contributed to origin of Gorkhas, which is why Gorkhas and rajput are related, rajputs are said to have originated from the race Jatt, which rajput dont want to admit cause they think they are royal or very high people which they were given by the brahmins. You should check the British chronicles
@diliprai If you follow british who have rated few forces in world as 'Martial' meaning high Valour: Gorkhas,Rajput,Jatt are in the list, along with people as the mesa-gaeta race ie the greek tribe, which is linked to Jatt race, so you can see all these people are actually genetically connected and part of a race modified along the years due to inter-marraiges and change in culture and religions. Again if you want read cast and tribes history rather than the dumb Wikipedia
@White0Dove Indinas have been lying all these years. Here's the truth.
1. Buddha is NOT incarnation of Hindu God as claimed by Hindu Aryan Brahmin. " The Sutta Lakkhan, describes the Shakya, whom the Gautma Buddha was born into as "those yellow-skinned, soft and delicate as the bronze, his dark hair and slanted eyes and black" (dialogues of the Buddha, Part III p.138)
2. Shivaism originated from Kirat,
check the video ==> "Kirat Temple" and you discover the crude or pure form of Shivaism.
@diliprai I dont know where you get this hatred or stupid stuff from but I have read since was 5 years old that Buddha was born in Lumbini and so does every literate Indian know!!! And I dont think people believe shit that a man as great as Buddha was incarnation of hindu god, if someone does well i would personally call them dumb, but I never met such a person in my life!!! Secondly history of Kirats is disputed cause they call themself Mongols but there is little evidence and there are many..
@diliprai are many people in India who claim same and have been found to have claims, so its disputed, that is why kirats are called Kirat-mongols and not mongols. Secondly after the shah many sites were changed into Hindu temples and buddhists places into hindu which I dont deny, but I clearly see your arguments head no where. Kirats have links with mongols no doubt bt Nepal was made by a hindu rajput. I am surprised you dint say anything to afghanis where majority of buddhists history existed!
@diliprai atleast in India you still find monasteries and stupas, when Gautama sent special dignitaries to indogreek places like present Afghanistan they had full conversion to Buddhism and that place was center of major Buddhist sculptures and temples which have sadly been destroyed. India has long supported Buddhism and Dalai lama, what more you want? you are just pointing to useless stuff which rather than screaming you should yourself solve by legal action.
and why ppl blame India if Buddha is known as Indian rather being Nepali? I dont think Indians spread this rumor. Western ppl always considered buddha to be Indian for many centuries and that belief is still persisting. For them everything beyond sindh river region,was Indian. I am sure there was not India-Nepal border then.All we can say Buddha had Indian culture not Nepali. suppose if agra become part of Nepal due to partitions, u cant say taj-Mahal was bulit by Nepali king Shhajahan.
@kingkhan2 Buddha was from Shakya family. Shakya is Mongoloid race. You still have doubt. Visit Nepal and you find Shakya communities living in Kathmandu. This same Shakya community also have custom of choosing Kumari(virign goddess).
And once you see Shakya, you will know that Buddha is Mongoloid race.
Over 2500+ years ago, Himalayas region was a stronghold of Kiratas. Kiratas means Mongoloid race. This is even mentioned in Veda, Puranas, Epic.
And once you see Shakya, you will know that Buddha is Mongoloid race.- stupid argument. just bcoz some ppl claim they r shakya does not prove anything. may be some early mongoloids accepted buddism and later on called as shakyas as Buddha belonged to shakya community. There r also Indian ppl who call themselves shakya.
fuck veda and puranas. Buddha was against it. When u talk about Buddha, dont talk of Veda which he called nonsense.
Over 2500+ years ago, Himalayas region was a stronghold of Kiratas. Kiratas means Mongoloid race. This is even mentioned in Veda, Puranas, Epic. - May be. It has nothing to do with Buddha. U know only fools feel pride about their ancient history and heritage rather than improving present. No one care u for ur elder's did. Ppl will recognise u for ur achievement. so dont waste on this kirata desh, mangoloid balh blah and try to make nepal developed and ppl will respect u.
@kingkhan2 why Nepal fail as antaion is because of Hindu people. The Hindu Kings ruled the indigenous Mongoloid Nepalese with caste discrimination. The Hindu rulers suppressed indigenous Nepalese culture-traditional-language and even their religion. Hindusim became a official religion and even Nepale was declared a Hindu nation. Majority of Nepalese were made dalits. This was the same reason why Mongoloid races in Nepal enlisted in the British Gurkhas Army because of discrimination at home.
@diliprai stop twisting the truth you imbecile..buddha was born in an indian family and everyone knows it...AND NOW THERE IS THIS SECOND BUDDHA BOY IN NEPAL PRETENDING TO BE BUDDHA HAHAHA YOU PEOPLE ARE FUCKING DISGRACE..STOP THIS NONSENSE
There is no proof if Buddha was mongolid or aryan. But by logics, it seems he was aryan. At that time aryans had dominance and only aryan could be king. and he rejected his ancestral religion which was vedic aryan hinduism.and if aryans had converted dravidians and mongoloids of indian subcontinent they would be treated as low caste.Only aryans could be brahmins and khshtriyas. there was less probabilty of mongolids to be kshtriya or king . Mostly Buddha was aryan not mongolid.
No matter how much nepalese argue, ppl still consider buddha as Indian. it is something registered in minds of ppl or may be coz Nepal has no value left. nepalease lowered their values by not focusing on technology and economy and arguing about ancient heritages. Rather than being pride of buddha or mount everest, try to develop ur country and then ppl themselves will recognise ur nation. try to create scientists and engineers or else ppl feel nepalese produce only labors and security guards.
I dont want to debate this.... Nepal was born in Modern day Nepal not modern day India.... Buddha was born in ancient India now Nepal... ok... And I know Shakya is.. it is a Aryan race not a mongoloid race... u can tell by looking at their face... their are aryan race dipil rai.I have many shakya friends... and i am not in doubt i know my race.
Buddha was born in Nepal to a Shakya family. Shakya people are Aryan people Indo- Aryan. Although there are debates that he might have another debate such as mongoliam that is fake because shakya are colored and many texts from buddhas times say he was aryan.
Anway Om Shanti shanti... please stop the argument and learn from the video.
@SandeepHumagain Shakya is Mongoloid race not Aryan. watch this video --> " 4.-Shakyamuni Buddha...Revolucionario Inédito (Segunda Parte del Episodio II)
and this will dispel all the misinformation the Aryan and now Indians has been writing about Buddha and Nepal.
And if you still have in doubt, Shakya still exist in Nepal.
Did he also know Sanskrit? In Bharat not just many one learns sanskrit. Not even the average man. You have to a high caste. Or Indo-European to have the right to learn the holy language.
@lollipopbbygrl10 His fathers small kingdom was in Nepal and in India. And he was the prince of Shakya he was born into Hindu Kshatriya clan which they came from India.Many India
SABAI CHAAN NEPAL MA MOUNT EVEREST, BUDDHA NI JANMEKO, HIMALAYA, MAHENDRA GUFA, SABAI CHAAN ABBA NEPALI JANTA AGADI BADAU, HISTORY MATRAI RAMRO BHAYERA HUDAINA... LETS CHANGE NEPAL... LETS DEVELOP NEPAL....
NEPALIBABU87 5 days ago
BUDA WAS BORN IN PAKISTAN
ACxaY 1 month ago
Firstly, your sentences are not written in appropriate grammar, so it's not clear what you are trying to say. Secondly, i am not sure if you have read carefully of what I have written because your so called reply seems to be just an unrelated racial stir. If you can't reply to my comments appropriately then please don't bother because the point I have made is a very valid one indeed.
rishav79 2 months ago
@rishav79 hey dhoti go to english school if you can't understand english. or go and learn kirati language so i can explain to you much better. finally use chopstick to eat ok. don't use hand....disgusting.
diliprai 1 month ago
indian encroach nepali land.
indian said lord buddha was born in india.
indian said lord buddha is avatar of hindu god vishnu.
indian builds fake birthplace of lord buddha.
indian said mt. everest is in india.
indian said nepal is part of india.
indian said they were victorious in mahabharata war.
indians said ravan was demon and so it is right to destroy sri-lanka.
after all this INDIA says " I'll Never do It Again"
INDIA=I'll Never do It Again=Coward
diliprai 1 week ago
looks like bunch of cunts (dhotis) dislike this video..fuck off morons...
nkit1o1 2 months ago
Just like western Europeans stole the image of Jesus Christ to an appeasing blonde hair, blue eyed scandanavian looking male despite the fact he was Aramaic. Likewise The Buddha's Mongolian image has been created to appease the majority of his followers. He was a Hindu crown prince name Siddhartha Gautum, his language was Sanskrit based therefore Indo-Aryan on origin.
rishav79 2 months ago
@rishav79 what did you said nepal king was incarnation of hindu god vishnu?
what did you said that lord buddha was incarnation of hindu god vishnu?
this is how cunning and manipulative brahmins are.
diliprai 2 months ago
buddha was a mongoloid oriental neplese born in lumbini nepal. india wants to steal thousands of pilgrims to their country so the falsely claim buddha was born in india.
Nameless9635 2 months ago
if buddha was born india then,why dont millions of buddhist goes to visit india rather then nepal....why would all those country like s.korea,china,france ,tailand,bhutan,japan,manang build there pilgrims in lumbini nepal...so think that dhootis
nawang9876 3 months ago
Doesn't make any sense to me anyway...........world is so globalized and it is about the history... so the evidence is suppose to prove this
asishgel 4 months ago
Buddha Was Born In NEPAL ....... Not In INDIA.
(Indian are trying to spread fake Message......!!)
Buddha was Born in Nepal..!! .... Not in India
Buddha was Born in Nepal..!! .... Not in India
Buddha was Born in Nepal..!! .... Not in India
Buddha was Born in Nepal..!! .... Not in India
Mrkrish1 4 months ago
Why are people using Dhotis as insults .. like lolwtfwut??
ilinaeternity 6 months ago
@pythonjibraltar......i just wanna say u one thing fuck u asshole..dhotis
25decvj 6 months ago
i wonder why buddhism is written in sanskrit/pali and not in nepali. why anchient chinese and japanese had to travel to india to learn buddhism. why tibetan in 7th bc had to invite indian guru to teach buddhism when calling a nepalian would have been easier as nepal is closer to tibet. anyway, it is stupid to fight over where lord buddha is born, it is more important where he resides. lord buddha resides where his teachings are followed. india & nepal are hindu majority country.
sandiya21683 6 months ago
Gays and Lesbians cannot be BUDDHISTS.
russkidancer1 6 months ago
So Buddha had to come to India to seek employment? Nepal was a poor baby even then!!!
akuap2001 7 months ago
Fuck u indian.dont ever try to insult nepal .......
11sagar123123 7 months ago
@pythonjibraltar still today in the 21st century my people are being discriminated in india.
watch this video --> The Kiratas In Modern India: Discriminated in their own home
if indian likes to discriminate mongoloid northeast indian, then it is better for northeast indian to demand separate and independent nation from india. voice out.
diliprai 8 months ago
Guys stop calling the Indians dhoties, I'm Nepali and I don't go around calling Indians Dhoties just because I hate them.
ForestHero11 8 months ago
fuck ,, indians,,,,,,dhoties,,,,,,,,,,
endrazit6 8 months ago
@pythonjibraltar Lord Buddha was from Shakya community. Shakya are Mongoloid race.
Define Mongoloid race?
Mongoloid - The maximum people of this race are found in areas of Himalayas like Nepal, Assam, and Burma (Myanmar) . Broad head, average height ,round face, yellow skin, small and flat nose, and small eyes are some common traits of this race.
Still hard to believe. I welcome you to Nepal and visit Shakya town in Kathmandu and see their appearance.
And yes Lord Buddha was born in Nepal.
diliprai 8 months ago
i am indeed happy to know that people are really concerned about culture and history.. keep up the good work..
pzya1 1 year ago
Jai Nepal Buddha Was born in Lumbine . Lumbine is Part of Nepal Jai Nepal(OM MA NE PA ME HU)
charliepapa100 1 year ago 3
honestly isn't it time to modify our culture and cultural beliefs according to time? why do we disagree against each other simple why don't we just give one new religion known as Nepalism? if you love Nepal you are following it, live for Nepal and Nepali die for Nepal and Nepali.
ashil07 1 year ago
This is the last message to all Indians. Fcuking dhoti one to own everything in this world now.
Lord Buddha was born into Shakya tribe in Nepal some 2500+ years ago
during the Kirat period (800BCE-330AD).
Kiratas & Shakya are Mongoloid race (same look as chinese, korean, asian).
Watch this video --> Kiratas:the Himalayas Race
That's why chinese, japanese, korean are predominately Buddhist because Lord Buddha was Mongoloid race. But stupid Indian will never understand this.
TaMaGuRaLi 1 year ago 11
@TaMaGuRaLi I'm not even Indian.....but I learned and believed that he was an Indian descendant because he was an Indo Aryan...(Indo Aryans came from India to Nepal right )and what about the curly hair? people of mongoloid race do not have curly hair I guess...but I've seen Indian people with curly hair...so he probably looked like an indian person with aryan origin...and of course it is fair to say he was a nepali with Indian origin :)
Neothefish 4 months ago
@TaMaGuRaLi Mongoloid are you.
NossaSurpresa 1 month ago
@NossaSurpresa yes i am mongoloid.
TaMaGuRaLi 1 month ago
khashai culture ta sabaiko culture nai hola ma ta sabai cutureko respect garchuu umm kirati culture hide bhaye ni truth nikle tyo truth nai sabai hune aaunu parcha culture ra historyma bhedbhau rakhnu hunna any way tara yasko naamma divide garnu hunna tyo chahi cha ok cheers
shishir871 1 year ago
In order for Nepal to have its own distinctive identity away from India, following must be taken by the Nepalese.
Buddha was born in Nepal and so the New Constitution of Nepal must make Buddhism as national religion of Nepal. More importantly Nepalese need to distinguish Hinduism.
Hinduism= Brahmanical religion + Kirati religion.
Nepalese must shift from Brahmanical religion towards Kirati religion. Kirat religion is more of worshiping of mother nature, land and ancestors.
Long Live Nepal
diliprai 1 year ago
lets not divide even nepalese saying aryans and mongoloid.. we all are nepalese. respect the cultures and people.. not the caste ..
pzya1 1 year ago
@pzya1 yes pzya1 we are nepalese but diliprai is not wrong either. he's trying to tell the world the truth. as we all know that nepal history was written by hindu rulers and his government. many historical reference to Kirat are hidden and only today these truth is coming out. In Nepal school, teacher always do not want to elaborate on Kirat history. The book too give small refernce to Kirat then says nothing is known about them and goes onto Licchavis, Thakuris and so on.
TaMaGuRaLi 1 year ago
@TaMaGuRaLi look bro india was so and is so wrong...at the time buddha was born it was Indian subcontinent there wasn't any nepal...u know that...now lumbini belongs to nepal....so i dont know what to say he is nepalese or indian...if he had given nationality ..probably he would get indian passport....thats fact...but now lumbini is nepal and nepal has full right to say siddhartha gautam was born in nepal...note; not buddha ...he became buddha at india...seriously i hate india and its gov too
latescarface21 1 year ago
Citizens of the World, the Indians claimed Buddha was born in India based on their ancient map. The ancient India was known as Bharatvarsha. But they forgot that Nepal was then known as Kiratdesh. They need to look deep into their own vedic books as Kiratdesh is listed as one of the 56 ancient kingdom.
In short,
Bharatvarsha ---> India
Kiratdesh ---> Nepal
check this video ---> "Kiratas:the Himalayas Race"
and you have better understanding of Nepal, culture and people of the Himalayas.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai yeah am saying the same thing...but does lumbini lies at kiratdesh??? bro look i dont have time for ur all this history things...i could like ur info about kirat but now am getting pissed off,,,,i dont care about my history why should i care about urs...that nepal was kirat desh and all??? i give a damn.
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 said " i dont care about my history why should i care about urs...that nepal was kirat desh and all???"
then why are you here claiming Buddha was born in India? If you don't give a damn care about your history, then please don't give false information to the world that he(Buddha) was born in India.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai i am not saying he was born in india....at that time there wasn't any nepal and neither india..did kiratdesh covered lumbhini??? u said kirats used to rule Himalayas so???? lumbhini is in terai...i am nepalese and i proud to be nepalese...for me all people are equal aint like u aryans and mongolians and all...i just wanted to say that...siddhartha gautam was born in lumbhini(in present nepal) and became Buddha in boydhgaya(in present india)
latescarface21 1 year ago
latescarface21, Bottom line although Lord Buddha attained enlightenment in India, his birth place is in Nepal. And yes the Kiratdesh covered all the Himalayas region from Nepal and Northeast India of Assam, Sikkim, Nagaland, Tripura per the vedic scriptures and books.You need to read more sources and not only depend so much information from Nepali teachers who are trained to spread in championing Hindu-Aryan civilization. The Himalayas region(Kiratdesh) is Mongoloid race civilization.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai you know mite...latescarface was somehow right but i agree with you too...but i want to know who and how do we know that he is aryan and other is mongoloid ???? if any mongoloid got married with aryan then their chikd would be what>>>???>>>> in this 21st century u are talking about this stupid things...aryans and mongoloid of nepal is like strength...when they are together even british couldn't rule US...nor nepalese aryans ran from india and we kirats lost war with aryans...
sudhan16502 1 year ago
@diliprai and matter of fact as far as i know...and we used to read in books too..siddhartha gautam got source of en-light from nepal and became buddha in india now say where he was born literally speaking???? i too used to get piss off when i used hear this but later on my teacher(chandra shakya, social teacher, L.A.S, hattiban lalitpur) told me in CHAT this things and i support him
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 yes it is true that Lord Buddha got enlightenment in India.
The place where Siddhartha Gautama got enlightenment or nirvana was in a village call Uruvela, in the state of Bihar, India. This place is now better known as Bodh-Gaya. It is believed that Siddhartha Gautama became Buddha mediating under the pipal tree. "Because it was under this tree that he was to find enlightenment, it is called the Bodhi-tree (Tree of Enlightenment) and is revered by Buddhists everywhere.
diliprai 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
indohistory com/maurya_empire
at that time nepal was part of india
akuap2001 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
Dove0White 1 year ago
Comment removed
Dove0White 1 year ago
Comment removed
Dove0White 1 year ago
@white0dove well brother sir!!! u are educated and bit of historian but i have never heard about this tsang...can u give me some link...well bro we gurkhas were rajput but now we are known as nepali, u believe??dont ya??? bro well last but not the least...thanks for extra history...u read about my country's history..no one said thanks for that...well it was pleasure meeting u, i definitely read about sikh history in very short period of time, long live ur Sikh's guru and JAI NEPAL
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 try reading cast and tribes of ancient india , I dont remember the author, try reading guide to taxila by john hubert marshall, or go to british library site and check for their online catalogue I am sure you will find abundant books on ancient history including nepal and what is the link between gorkhas and rajputs and jatts. Good luck with your search! Hueng Tsang was an ancient historians we read about him since class 3 till class 12! search him on google!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@latescarface21 its wierd I tried posting a site for history bt couldnt check your messages have sent you a site to check Gorkha and Nepal history, good luck!
Dove0White 1 year ago
Not only Buddha originated in Nepal, Sivaism too have it origin in Nepal. check this video --> "KIRAT: A bridge between Nepal - Mongolia revealing the origin of Sivaism"
and the light will be shed. That's why you see Siva always resting above the Himalayas. He is from the Himalayas race(Kirat).
diliprai 1 year ago
@latescarface21. isn't it so funny that Indians always claim that Buddha was born in India. Neolithic tools found in the Kathmandu Valley, Dang and Sikkim proved that Mongoloid ethnicity have been living in the Himalayan region for past 10,000 years. The findings of these neolithic tools can be found on
---> "Archaeological Activities in Nepal Since 1893 AD To 2002 AD" by Prakash Darna
I agree with diliprai that Indians are NOT Mongoloid race so how come they even think of owing Nepal.
TaMaGuRaLi 1 year ago
@white0dove cheers bro...thank you...well bro british are from cold places...so they were fed up staying at hot as hell in india..so they were so keen to colonise nepal...well bro thats why they did maldives....and at that time nepal was full of gold left by lichivi, malla and kirats...they did try to colonise brother but like american lost war at Vietnam coz of lack of geographical knowledge so did britsh too...
latescarface21 1 year ago
I agree with your video description. It is true and sad at the same time. India being a giant has the tendency to overwhelm its much smaller neighbors and their history. Mohenjadaro or indus civilization existed in a region which is in pakistan but its always associated with india. Similarly budda was born in kartikdesa or nepal but its always associated with india. As an indian we should not undermine or twist hisotric facts under the patriotic umbrella.
Rohit84up 1 year ago
@Rohit84up are you serious? very important part of Indus valley was found in Patiala, Punjab, India. It is in Pakistan and India. you cant categorize it like that. The reason India is mentioned is cause the pakistan site is more under bombs than scientists. It is sad about the movie, but please don't twist history and historical findings like that. Its found in India and Pakistan.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@ white0dove bro now i dont want to talk to you anymore at last let me tell you...write to anyone,may be u could say me stubborn or arrogant..but i dont feel proud of being part of india.. i dont hate india but i feel proud of being nepalese...u can count that u won and i lost...but nepal was free country and is...am proud of being free man of free country...well al last bro enjoy ur common wealth game...peace be upon india....and its from my heart...remember dont reply..u won i lost
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 why do people when know they are wrong and arguin uselessly say I wont reply anymore? I understand your sentiments but maybe you should read more, go out of Nepal and read, not in India but somewhere else! I know how you feel cause these irritating scientist say even I am not Indian cause my ancestors came from somewhere else well!! But it doesn't mean history is wrong.I aint in India right now so well but have a nice day, i aint replying uselessly now, read more.....
White0Dove 1 year ago
@latescarface21 sorry I cant control from replying I have no hard feelings here so well, I dint reply to win, I just like to have knowledge, get it and give it, Peace.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@ white0dove and yeah india didnt bow??? bro look at size of indian and nepal...britian was cunning country at that time if they could win ur country then why they didnt use their force to won nepal and make them slave like they did to other country??? i know u say some emotional drama answer..lol but history book says u lost the war..didnt say why or how...u may have inter reason for that coz u know well than history coz u are native...history say u became slave and all...
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 lol dont say why and how? lol must be Nepali history book :P cause I read a lot and there is a lot of history!!! and punjab never gave in, until few of dumb people acted like nepalese and supported britishers, that is how we lost the war! there is special history fr that 40 soldiers against 400! a TRUE one! Please advise your library to have books, and if you say about london just go and see british museum or national history or british library, books are abundant!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@ white0dove i just know that am nepalese...and we create diff history, we fought with british...neither we lost nor we won...both of them wanted to have treaty and did...bro read the deep history of nepal..ur so called gurung gotra, magar...even tharu of nepal had fought equally at war...so i do mix up and say gurkha was not rajput beacause what about their sacrifice at that war???
latescarface21 1 year ago
@ white0dove i never feel proud of being khas... i feel proud being nepalese... i feel proud when i see gurkha statue in middle of the london...i feel superior when anyone ask me weather ur country was colonized by british and i reply NO...brother whoever u are..historian or sikh or whatever...or u stick nepal to rajput or whatever nobody gives shit...i just wanted to say i even dont believe in diliprai even he's nepali, u are sikh, i give a shit and i dont want to know ur history too...
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 as for colonisation I dont think there was any good in colonising Nepal, there wasnt much to offer, except army and weapons which the Nepalese heartly supported britishers and so britishers did not need to colonise them, cause they got what they wanted, Nepal never uprose against the british demand that is the reason in world history there is only one country listed as not having been taken over by another people besides british and that is not Nepal! Go check yourself!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@ white0dove bro u are amazing. gorakhnath shah??? where did u read this??? ok i really used to rely on indian books but from today NO...hahahaha he was god...and bro have u ever been to gorkha??? coz i have been...i dont know who is this idiot wrote abt nepalese history but gorkha must relate with gurung coz gurungs are native of gorkha, i dont know abt rajput or whatever, or from punjab and i give a shit...am proud of being nepalese and my history starts from nepal....
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 just because you are from Nepal does not qualify you as a historian and its not an Indian book, its written by chinese and british historians, like tsang, have you heard of him? I dont think so, so please shutup until you read more.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@latescarface21 as for Gorkha statue, the british recognised them as martial race, just as they recognised rajput and jatts, you should be proud and I am happy for you, and yes Gurungs are all gorkhas, but all gorkhas are not gurungs, so you after all accept what I said. good!
White0Dove 1 year ago
This video is stupid and the comments here are worse, if you really want some real discussion on FACTS message me, else talk to diliprai and other people like him here.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove well bro dont believe to diliprai...he is poison...hate creates hate...i dont like indian government policy against nepal, that i say openly...they are ruining our country....but i have many indian friends in london,believe me they are so nice to me..they say we are from neighbouring country.bro if u give respect then u get too, u know why these nepali ppl against u? coz u are interferin in our history and they think u are another ppl like indian gov...and i am too against diliprai
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 ummm actually u r right,if we have unity tha are samen india nepal food,talking way n many culture match,besides india n nepal in any world nation while they meet they become fren too.hate create in nepal specially because of border enroachment.but we not sure but media show india enroaching border n interfaring nepali politics,any way infact because of english we all india pakistan nepal get suffer,hamara asali dushman in my opinion
shishir871 1 year ago
@latescarface21 being khas does not mean you are superior or destined to be king, there were many non-khas kings in Indian history and people from punjab who denied the caste system! As for Nepal I have nothing against it, I have shouting that Buddha was born there, and as for problems, what you think abt us , we are depicted abt you, so its not clear whether its the media or the politics, I just replied here cause I wanted the history right, specially one which relates to me! Have a nice day :)
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove sikh was sikh and is...even they fight under christian and if anyone says that all sikh group during war was christian then how would u feel??? angry..wouldn't u??? even u know commander was christian...nd thapa, pandey( Kshatriya), bista arent rajput for sure...they are Khas...and they used be the commander, i like indian history too. knew lil knowledge but dont want to say anything coz aint indian and u people know what is correct history than books so do we. i think u understood..
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 I think you dont understand the reason castes were created and why they mean nothing to me. Gurung is a gotra, not a caste. I cant explain the stupid hindu technicality but you cant mix Gorkha with gurung, or gorkha with sikh, Gorkha is a race, sikh is a religion while gurung is a gotra, now if people fight in an army its diff but when people fight for religion its diff, when people fight as a race for land its diff! now you understand?
White0Dove 1 year ago
@White0Dove any ways in india only sikhs are good soldier too, i heard their history.
shishir871 1 year ago
@latescarface21 btw since you so up for rajputs, let me tell you, they are genetically just an uprooted branch of jatts and so are the jats, there is no diff except that rajputs adopted hinduism and were given land in return and political power by brahmins and a high caste, but genetically and proven by scienctist ,they along with jat, are the bloodlines of the jatts( from Punjab) which is a race and not a caste as often mistaken by people around the world!!!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove well bro one simple question...if u are good in history then gorkahli armies were gurung, magar and khas( Kshatriya) at first, weren't they??? later on kirat joined...former was shah(so called rajput) but does it mean gorkhali was rajput??? lets say many sikh fought along with british in 1 and 2nd word war under british captain or whatever now were all sikh christian??? i guess NO...u cant say gorkha army was rajput
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 First of all Gorkhali is an Indian word but had no historical refrence, secodnly Kirats were never hindu, they have mongol links. Shah was not kirat. the person Gorakhnath he was in a smadh when a certain person a shah, stayed with him as a devotee and the saint said he will be called a gorkha : the one with valour and vigour, the saint was a rajput, and so his disciples came from him, were also rajput. Now stop saying it an army, it happened before britishers came!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@latescarface21 now you will say britishers came much before 1700,but not to himalayas, because they had to first win the sikh war! before shahs, kirats had small kingdoms, Gorakhnath shah awoke from his meditation and decided to unite all kingdoms and make a nepal! He was a rajput, secodnly stop saying kshatriya shit, we are talking about races here not castes, Gorkha is a race not a cast, while Gurung is not a race. Fighting in a british army is different, its organised and people join it
White0Dove 1 year ago
@latescarface21 but getttin together your race and making an army of GORKHAS by a Gorkha is different. No matter who fights, truth is the leader made it possible, who was a rajput, because of this dominance,later Nepal had more hindus and less buddhists, earlier than that the whole area stretched till afghanistan was buddhists!! And my forefather fought in world war 1 and 2 and it was nothing like fighting for your own land or race, or nation!!! and stop saying Gorkhali lol its ruins everything!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@latescarface21 you are mixing religion, with race and mixing caste with race! People can be mongol but are christian or muslim or buddhists are same time! They can be diff surname does not mean they are not mongol. Kashatriya was created by brahmins, it wasnt even dipicted in present form in the vedas, it had diff significance, Gorkha is not a caste, its a race. When sikh fought under britishers it was an army, but people fighting in the sikh war 1 and 2 were all jatts, that was a race!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove hmmm...impressive....brother...am Kshatriya, rana are not from shah well shah might be rajput but rana was like post before rana they were kunwar...i studied that in books i dont know what u read???? first rana pime minister ofnepal was junga bahdur rana, he was kunwar too before...aint have hard feelins about india, yeah at time gorkha was hindhu for sure, only later on people changed to buddhism...
latescarface21 1 year ago
@latescarface21 hmmm no they were all buddhist before and later changed to hindu, you facts are pretty lame. And rana which was in Nepal came after shahs, he was no prince, he murdered the royals as he himself had no right to reign directly. Hmmm I think you should read more!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove by the way gorkha is not a name of army force...it is gorkhali or gurkha...gorkha is palce or kingdom of prithivi naryan shah from where he started war against other small country...but as a matter of fact, since some hindhu were at the top level, it doesnt mean gorkhali were proper hindhu...pun, magar, gurung had fought along with them...where most of them are buddhist...it was lets say mixed up army but they were gorkhali, and nepali rana and kunwas dont belong to rajputs
sudhan16502 1 year ago
@sudhan16502 you history is very poor my friend. First of all I never said armed forces. Secondly Saint Gorakhnath Created the word GORKHA, thirdly he was hindu, and lastly shah dynasty were his disciples decendants. hmm read more before blabbering. It has got nothing to do with hindu,neither am I one. and Gurung is a gotra, stop mixing it with gorkhas. That is the main reason present Nepal has more Hindus, cause the guy who started its unification was a rajput, case closed.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@White0Dove said "Saint Gorakhnath Created the word GORKHA,....and Gurung is a gotra, stop mixing it with gorkhas" Indians claims
-that Lord Buddha was born in India and was Hindu Aryan.
-Mt. Everest is located in India
and now Gorkha and Gurung also originated in India. LMAO!!!
Indians are dirty and corrupted by birth.
The only Indian invented was Aryan race, caste system, sati system(burning of widow), dowry system, corruption, money laundering, terrorism, human trafficking, AIDs, etc
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai are you demented? seriously did you knock your head somewhere? India never said Mt Everest is in India, only an idiot like you will say so, and I am not repeating that Buddha was not a hindu and not an Indian, sigh! its futile talking to you I am not wasting my precious time on you anymore, you are a certified hate breeder. First get your history right, second get a mental check up done! Third none of the things you state here are true: none, India did not invent Aryan race, or others.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai well I aint replying anymore, you freak. go sleep peacefully cause I wont be stating fact anymore,add as much fiction you want and make a sick film out of it!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@sudhan16502 There is no term as gorkhalis lol you mixing puns in too! Oh my dear god! Next you will say Gorkhas are mongols and that huns were too in Nepal! Go read more, and shush until you know more. Nepali rana lol ranas came after the shah, he actually killed the king and his brother to be kind hmmm he was the wasir, which you dont knw, well, I dont have time to explain more!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove...yeah i know that...but at that time there was no nepal...NEPAL no NEPAL...u said whatever betn china and india, did anyone mention nepal, before nepal there was many small country within modern nepal...later they unified into Nepal...and never got colonize by any other country...thats whaat am proud of, not for being part of rajput or anyone...now what then???i dont know what we are getting from this arguement???
sudhan16502 1 year ago
@sudhan16502 when your so called Nepal was never colonized cause they pledged allegiance with britishers, to help them whenever they could, provide food and men for battle, which the Indians did not bow to and hence the battle ensued, there was only one indo-gorkha war, after which britishers recognized Nepal as a nation in 1924. hmmm actually all gorkhas are rajputs :) lol sorry but its true. Dont worry I am not rajput. The argument is people calling names at India without a reason.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@white0dove bruv well done...yeah i know hinduism,buddhism and sikh are all from india...that true, i never said buddha wasnt from india just wanted to say sidhartha was born in lumbini which is now in nepal...and became buddha in india...well u are mistaken nepal was never ruled by anyone except shah..may be they had some part but not modern NEPAL...if u find any link modern nepal was ruled by gupta or whatever..lemme know...there wasnt any nepal before shah...thank you (:
sudhan16502 1 year ago
@sudhan16502 go look in history books yourself. Start reading about Chandragupta II he took over what ever was left between china and India, including the Kiratas, which includes the mordern day Nepal, he defeated all the hindukush,kiratas,kinnaras ot include into proper India. As started by his father Chandragupta. I can only refer a book to you if you can find: Raghu Vamsa v 4.60-75
White0Dove 1 year ago
@White0Dove just to edit Chandragupta In was his grandfather not father of Chandragupta II
White0Dove 1 year ago
my reply was to reference of India being conquered, I think people need to know more about Nepal history before spitting out venom. Even the MODERN Nepal was recognized by Britishers only in 1924 so I don't know why it matters, I never said Buddha was born in India, we have learned since class 2 that he was born in Lumbini, but abusing another nation and people just on basis of a stupid flop movie is dumb and amounts to spreading of only hatred which I cannot understand, how it helps any cause?
White0Dove 1 year ago
@sudhan16502 personally I am very proud of my history with so many diversities entering India and enriching its culture because of which my own family had indo-Greek and indo-Scythian ancestors and I don't see how it is bad? genetically everyone is related to each other so I don't feel anyone is inferior or superior. Whoever put this video clearly lacks the way to deal with a problem and believed in spreading of racism and hatred, lastly I believe with such rich history India is a rich country.
White0Dove 1 year ago
As for anyone who thinks Nepal was never ruled by anyone, it was under the influence of the Mauryan Empire and later became a vassal state under the Gupta Empire , you know like one who never dares fight and whenever required gave military assistant to the dominant state. if you need more history contact me. have a nice day :)
White0Dove 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nepal Developed on its own... it was never build up by any British or India or China. Though they helps us but we Nepalese are never a parasite on them as India used to be parasitic dependent on Britain. So you British followers stop claiming the false fact that Buddha was born in India and stop building false kapilbastu in India..
TheF0rbiddenPrince 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheF0rbiddenPrince 1 year ago
TODAY NEPAL IS UNDER CHINA N THEY R LIKE SLAVES HAHA. THEY HAVE TO DO WATEVER CHINA WANTS THEM TO DO. lol
trapgyal1 1 year ago
The Sutta Lakkhan, describes the Shakya, whom the Gautma Buddha was born into as "those yellow-skinned, soft and delicate as the bronze, his dark hair and slanted eyes and black" (dialogues of the Buddha, Part III p.138)
Now this clearly tells you Shakya ethnic group was Mongoloid race before as still today in Nepal and clearly proved you wrong that Buddha was indeed Mongoloid race.
diliprai 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 nepal is nevr under china. whatever it did it did on its own.. but the fact all know is india as it is in present was developed by britain.. so you all are under britain...
TheF0rbiddenPrince 1 year ago
@TheF0rbiddenPrince for anyone to capture a place there has to be something worthwhile in it and I seriously doubt Nepal has ANYTHING to offer!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@TheF0rbiddenPrince haha u stupid biatch..im not an indian or im not even nepali..but im not gon tell u where im frm ..lol.;i know that nepal is a fuckin loser country..it always was..u ppl couldn't even make ur own sewing needle..lol..forget about the rest..by the way, i didn't say nepal is officially under china, but nepal is fully under ccp's influence and u can't run from them lol..u ppl r fucked for good.
trapgyal1 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 fuck u. ur india is sucked by other people sometimes .,alexender rome.,ur mother raped by muslim n sisters raped by britain 4 centuries n u dont shy telling nepal under china control. idiot, nepal is d only nation un beatable by centuries,watch our ancient flag n watch ur 100 time pussy changing flag......whoever big dick come in world u people always have sucked but nepal is still unbeatable n free nation till now,
shishir871 1 year ago
@shishir871 u must be thinking i was born yesterday hahaha..i thought i read somewhere that nepal made an agreement not to fight or get attacked by other nation something like that..haha ur country nepal the nepalis are so fuckin hilarious..they don't wanna get indulged in war coz they knows theyll get raped within minutes lol..hilarious..they can't even make their own sewing needle lol..independent for ever and still backward like shit..shame on u ppl calling nepal grt..lmfao
trapgyal1 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 hahaha there is no such agreement, dont touch us,while ur hrihtik bullied nepal how many dhotis we killed in nepal remember. so think about nepal living dhotis ok. back ward,wats that look at ur bihar n many state how back are they,nepal is not most backward nation there r more back nation than it n wat about india, look at begger in traistaion, most begger living country,nagalaind eating dogs n rats,n u tell us back first see ur face in mirror
shishir871 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 u know wat, indian begger can speak english it not cos india is forward but d fact is ur mother sucked thier dick so deeply u made it national language,in army minister home every where i saw indian speaking englishstep father n if u go i doubt do they understand hindi or not n ur train r made by english n u say nepal depending on other jaja tere deshko aajad huye aur apne paau pe khade huye65 saal bhi nahi huyee bada hi dependence ki baat karta hai. tie laga, english bol slaves
shishir871 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 while i read indian history uhuhu i cry hahahaha after defeating tipusultaan how english raped every girl mother even ur grand mother,while watcing freedom movie english hanged u so much uff cant see dhotis like bats hanging trees.hahaha all d gold looted,every time english raped all sexy bitch of india,luckyy bastards,brih divided u in part n part.wat u think do u trust ur indian,they r divided n every where rebolution terrorism,its britain who ruined u fuckers so stop m. this movie
shishir871 1 year ago
Over 5000+ years go our King Yalamber fought these Indian monsters. It is clearly written in the Mahabharata epic my Nepali brothers and sisters that Kirat army fought these Indian who were encroaching our land. It is known in that war that Cinas(chinese) helped Kiratas to protect Nepal sovereignty. But the Indians in order to be friendly with Nepalese, the Indians accepted Kirat religion as theirs.
diliprai 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 hello asshole. mandabuddhi
Nepal kisi bhi outsider ne kabhi bhi rule nahi kiya.
it was always an independent nation.
eat ur shit
people like u who speak without using ur minds are bringing disgrace to your land of rama and gandhi
reway7 1 year ago
@reway7 hello imbecile;;;i don't understand wha ur saying u.;u forgot ur daily dosis or something ...?? yeah independent my ass..this country is the biggest shame in the history of world. they could never make progress by themselves...;always got help from ouside countries..fucktards who beg for help everywhere in the world..lol..u ppl r the disgrace of himalayan people.this world will be a better place without you yellow monkeys.
trapgyal1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trapgyal1 @trapgyal1 hello asshole. mandabuddhi
Nepal kisi bhi outsider ne kabhi bhi rule nahi kiya.
it was always an independent nation.
eat ur shit
people like u who speak without using ur minds are bringing disgrace to your land of rama and gandhi
reway7 1 year ago
There wasnt a country called nepal at that time it was part of india.
montoogom 1 year ago
@montoogom there wasn't a country called Nepal at that time. You are correct. There wasn't Nepal at that time. That time it was called Kiratdesh.
The term Nepal came to exist from 4th BCE.
Any by the way, Kiratas were never Hindus and still they are not Hindus. Kirat are Mongoloid race unlike Indian and so had different religion and practices away from vedic teachings. check the video i have link below.
Finally India was built by British so it is part of Britain.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai your history is very poor to say that India was 'built' by Britishers. I think you need to read a lot before saying anything. Half truth is more dangerous than a lie!!!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@White0Dove and as for your Kiratdesh, they wernt budhists either, they all practiced paganism just LIKE hinduism. sigh! you are just like a child, how old are you? 12?
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai not mater what you say, Jainism, Budhism, Hinduism and Sikhism ORIGINATED from India. THAT IS A FACT, RUB IT ON YOUR FACE AND REMEMBER IT. Sadly if you people are Buddhists its sad you malign the very country which gave birth to your religion. Wonder what a great man like Gautam must think of you.
White0Dove 1 year ago
...and u are right history is history...live in present...but fellow...u said @diliprai that they gave nepal to hindhu kings??? and what about ur tribe gave it muslims??? they died!!! what would u expect in war??? party or treat??? killing and dieing is rule of war but what does matter is who stood till last and who felt down first...
by the way am also kirat but am proud they lost with hindhu kings...rathr than sikh or other...so till now we have been siniging our own national anthem...
sudhan16502 1 year ago
Still today the Kirat have their original religion which is animistic. The Kirat worshiped land, nature and their ancestors. check the video => "Sakela~the greatest festival of Kirat people"
The term Nepal came to exist from 4th BCE. The vedic scriptures and other ancient texts mentioned the Himalayas region as Kiratdesh or land of Kiratas.
check the video ==> "Kiratas:The Himalayas Race" for better knowledge and clarification. And yes Buddha was Mongoloid race and was born in Nepal
diliprai 1 year ago
@white0dove...brother u are sikh...respect for that...we nepalese tried to defeat you all sikh but couldnt...we were badly defeated...history says it lack of knowledge...and i admit that...no doubt ur tribes are warriors...but u know what but...we were never colonised by any other countries...our gorkhas had also died...alot...but still we keep our country free and independent
sudhan16502 1 year ago
@kingkhan 2...and u know...u go to china...burma...or or SRILANKA...or thailand or japan...or korea...they say buddha was born in nepal...and u fucking idiot...what te fuck is that westerns???? who the hell are they??? did u forget ur country was fucked by them and took all away ur treasures...and still many indian live in uk...bullocks...u have no independent history so u dont like it!!! but we are proud of our history...
sudhan16502 1 year ago
@kingkhan2...listen u motherfucker...i am nepalese and i havent said yet...coz i know siddhartha gautam was born in nepal but he became buddha in india...and its god...he is not nepalese or indian or of any countries...but the point is u fucker...what the hell u are saying about my countries cast??? and fuck you...dont you dare about saying anything about my country...ok lets dnt say abt past...and u know what...westerns are not an asian...
sudhan16502 1 year ago
Also i heard that the indians used to purchase nepalese quality carpets, take out the tag and put indians tag in it and send overseas while puting nepalese tag on their low standard carpet, causng loss and shutting down of carpet factories in nepal. is that true or is it only a rumour?????????? any ideaa!!!!
himal200 1 year ago
Lord Gautam Buddha was born in Nepal, not india...... what do the indians thinks???/ being powerful than nepal doesn't mean they can say anything and spread the false rumour like that...... whatever they say but they can't change the fact that Gautam Buddha borned in Nepal.
himal200 1 year ago
Before there was india, nepal small towns were ruled by different kings. Yes no country has taken over Nepal unlike India. Yes India can be proud that British made what thay call India now. In India even today people shit around train tracks yes sharing a bidi. And finally to all Indians who comment here visit all parts of india then come and visit nepal and then write here which country is balanced beautiful and developed as a whole country untill then..........
laxmanbasyal 1 year ago
So people now you all must have known that Buddha was born in Kiratdesh vis a vis Nepal in about 563 BCE.
Lord Buddha was born into Shakya tribe, a Mongoloid race ruling Kapilavastu region.
diliprai 1 year ago
isnt it sad diliprai if only the so called gorkhas had some guts like the punjabis in north they would have kept the nepal with them rather than submit to hindu kings, just like the 40 sikhs who fought till death even though they lost to muslim forces, well atleast they died trying?
people can say all they want to about history,what matter is what you do now for your religion and country, your blood wont rescue you and abusin and calling people names and their country bad will certainly wont!
White0Dove 1 year ago
I seriously don't know why this video was put up! I have been taught since I was 5 years old that Gautam Buddha was born in Lumbini and when he was in India in Bodhgaya he attained englightenment. If only he knew this would follow I am sure he would have stayed in Nepal to get enlightenment also LOL poor Buddha so much of Abuses to other people on his name. so much for being a buddhist lool
White0Dove 1 year ago
and how does it matter where he was born? LOL he attainted enlightenment in BODHGAYA, in INDIA end of discussion! maybe you should come to India and you will have sense in the tiny brain of yours.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@ diliprai you have been replying since what last year? lol hmmmm seems like you really need some therapy!
White0Dove 1 year ago
It is no wonder chinese, tibetan,japanese, korean,thai, vietnamese all Mongoloid nation are Buddhist nation.
watch this video for more info. -->
"4.-Shakyamuni Buddha...Revolucionario Inédito (Segunda Parte del Episodio II) "
India always tried to claim everything that is good but never confess anything about caste system, sati system, dowry system which
were all originated in India. No wonder no body trust Indians and they are even gettiing abused in Australia.
Jai Nepal
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai and how is it of any significance? being mongoloid is what supreme? I seriously dont know what is the fight here? if you really want to do something talk to people who made the movie, but I guess you dont have the money. There is nothing to claim, everyone knows, Buddha gained enlightenment in India lol and I dont see how caste or sati is related to this fact? and not to shy away from the fact that atleast 5 or more religions in the world originated from India.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai stop crying like a baby and do something for your country for once. As for Australians I dont give a damn, even Indians abuse Australians, and I still dont care its their problem who stay there and I dont. The fact remains that Buddha did not reach enlightenment in Nepal, your so called land, there must be something in India that he got enlightened here and started preaching here then go around the world. or you want some more history?
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai ok let me teach you Nepali History. 1. Gorkhas are not Mongols,mongols are not gorkhas, since its clear now, Nepal was founded by Gorkha king who migrated to Nepal from India and for that read Gorkha history and how the name originated from a saint. 2. Tibetians were not all mongols and nor were Sakyas, the first documented contact between the mongols and Tibetians was in 1215. Nepal was founded BY Gorkhas. Nepal did not found Gorkhas ok, once again Gorkhas found Nepal not vice versa.
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai and lastly Gorkhas were Hindus, no matter how much you deny the fact or shout it wont change,they were of rajput ehtnicity, that is why Nepal was established in 16th Century after the Rajput originated by the shahs. Gorkhas were not mongols, stop shouting it all around youtube. Whatever you are reading is poor research probably from wiki I guess. Maybe you should start reading the book: Caste and Tribes of ancient Asia or western and northern India, who migrated and formulated kingdoms
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai shahs were purely Gorkhas, and Gorkhas purely Rajput and if you read Rajput history, well read it , they originated from Northwest India. Saint Gorakhnath contributed to origin of Gorkhas, which is why Gorkhas and rajput are related, rajputs are said to have originated from the race Jatt, which rajput dont want to admit cause they think they are royal or very high people which they were given by the brahmins. You should check the British chronicles
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai If you follow british who have rated few forces in world as 'Martial' meaning high Valour: Gorkhas,Rajput,Jatt are in the list, along with people as the mesa-gaeta race ie the greek tribe, which is linked to Jatt race, so you can see all these people are actually genetically connected and part of a race modified along the years due to inter-marraiges and change in culture and religions. Again if you want read cast and tribes history rather than the dumb Wikipedia
White0Dove 1 year ago
@White0Dove Indinas have been lying all these years. Here's the truth.
1. Buddha is NOT incarnation of Hindu God as claimed by Hindu Aryan Brahmin. " The Sutta Lakkhan, describes the Shakya, whom the Gautma Buddha was born into as "those yellow-skinned, soft and delicate as the bronze, his dark hair and slanted eyes and black" (dialogues of the Buddha, Part III p.138)
2. Shivaism originated from Kirat,
check the video ==> "Kirat Temple" and you discover the crude or pure form of Shivaism.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai I dont know where you get this hatred or stupid stuff from but I have read since was 5 years old that Buddha was born in Lumbini and so does every literate Indian know!!! And I dont think people believe shit that a man as great as Buddha was incarnation of hindu god, if someone does well i would personally call them dumb, but I never met such a person in my life!!! Secondly history of Kirats is disputed cause they call themself Mongols but there is little evidence and there are many..
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai are many people in India who claim same and have been found to have claims, so its disputed, that is why kirats are called Kirat-mongols and not mongols. Secondly after the shah many sites were changed into Hindu temples and buddhists places into hindu which I dont deny, but I clearly see your arguments head no where. Kirats have links with mongols no doubt bt Nepal was made by a hindu rajput. I am surprised you dint say anything to afghanis where majority of buddhists history existed!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@diliprai atleast in India you still find monasteries and stupas, when Gautama sent special dignitaries to indogreek places like present Afghanistan they had full conversion to Buddhism and that place was center of major Buddhist sculptures and temples which have sadly been destroyed. India has long supported Buddhism and Dalai lama, what more you want? you are just pointing to useless stuff which rather than screaming you should yourself solve by legal action.
White0Dove 1 year ago
yup buddha was baorn in nepal at lumbini...............not in india
jptnikesh 1 year ago
and why ppl blame India if Buddha is known as Indian rather being Nepali? I dont think Indians spread this rumor. Western ppl always considered buddha to be Indian for many centuries and that belief is still persisting. For them everything beyond sindh river region,was Indian. I am sure there was not India-Nepal border then.All we can say Buddha had Indian culture not Nepali. suppose if agra become part of Nepal due to partitions, u cant say taj-Mahal was bulit by Nepali king Shhajahan.
kingkhan2 1 year ago
@kingkhan2 Buddha was from Shakya family. Shakya is Mongoloid race. You still have doubt. Visit Nepal and you find Shakya communities living in Kathmandu. This same Shakya community also have custom of choosing Kumari(virign goddess).
And once you see Shakya, you will know that Buddha is Mongoloid race.
Over 2500+ years ago, Himalayas region was a stronghold of Kiratas. Kiratas means Mongoloid race. This is even mentioned in Veda, Puranas, Epic.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai
And once you see Shakya, you will know that Buddha is Mongoloid race.- stupid argument. just bcoz some ppl claim they r shakya does not prove anything. may be some early mongoloids accepted buddism and later on called as shakyas as Buddha belonged to shakya community. There r also Indian ppl who call themselves shakya.
fuck veda and puranas. Buddha was against it. When u talk about Buddha, dont talk of Veda which he called nonsense.
kingkhan2 1 year ago
@diliprai very simple logic.
When Buddha was born Indian subcontinent was ruled by Aryans. Aryans considered all natives as low caste.
Dravidians and mongoloids lived here much before aryans came. So it is proved that mongoloids and draviadians were deemed as low caste by Aryans.
So it is impossible to think Budddha's father was king despite being a mongoloid. Buddha's family was most probbaly aryan not mangoloid .
kingkhan2 1 year ago
@diliprai
Over 2500+ years ago, Himalayas region was a stronghold of Kiratas. Kiratas means Mongoloid race. This is even mentioned in Veda, Puranas, Epic. - May be. It has nothing to do with Buddha. U know only fools feel pride about their ancient history and heritage rather than improving present. No one care u for ur elder's did. Ppl will recognise u for ur achievement. so dont waste on this kirata desh, mangoloid balh blah and try to make nepal developed and ppl will respect u.
kingkhan2 1 year ago
@kingkhan2 why Nepal fail as antaion is because of Hindu people. The Hindu Kings ruled the indigenous Mongoloid Nepalese with caste discrimination. The Hindu rulers suppressed indigenous Nepalese culture-traditional-language and even their religion. Hindusim became a official religion and even Nepale was declared a Hindu nation. Majority of Nepalese were made dalits. This was the same reason why Mongoloid races in Nepal enlisted in the British Gurkhas Army because of discrimination at home.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai stop twisting the truth you imbecile..buddha was born in an indian family and everyone knows it...AND NOW THERE IS THIS SECOND BUDDHA BOY IN NEPAL PRETENDING TO BE BUDDHA HAHAHA YOU PEOPLE ARE FUCKING DISGRACE..STOP THIS NONSENSE
trapgyal1 1 year ago
@trapgyal1 shutup, Buddha was born in a kirta-mongol family, stop speaking nonsense! No wonder people say wrong things about Indians!
White0Dove 1 year ago
@kingkhan2 thats very true and the person who put this video should change the topic..
trapgyal1 1 year ago
There is no proof if Buddha was mongolid or aryan. But by logics, it seems he was aryan. At that time aryans had dominance and only aryan could be king. and he rejected his ancestral religion which was vedic aryan hinduism.and if aryans had converted dravidians and mongoloids of indian subcontinent they would be treated as low caste.Only aryans could be brahmins and khshtriyas. there was less probabilty of mongolids to be kshtriya or king . Mostly Buddha was aryan not mongolid.
kingkhan2 1 year ago
No matter how much nepalese argue, ppl still consider buddha as Indian. it is something registered in minds of ppl or may be coz Nepal has no value left. nepalease lowered their values by not focusing on technology and economy and arguing about ancient heritages. Rather than being pride of buddha or mount everest, try to develop ur country and then ppl themselves will recognise ur nation. try to create scientists and engineers or else ppl feel nepalese produce only labors and security guards.
kingkhan2 1 year ago
Comment removed
kuwaitiiraqi123 1 year ago
i know shakyas that have no mongoloid races and some that do... buddha could have been a mix of aryan and mongolid u never know..... no evidence...
and if u know what shakya means shakya is a hindu word
SandeepHumagain 1 year ago
and u could have been a mongolid race or an aryan race=... u never know....... very less evidence today
SandeepHumagain 1 year ago
I dont want to debate this.... Nepal was born in Modern day Nepal not modern day India.... Buddha was born in ancient India now Nepal... ok... And I know Shakya is.. it is a Aryan race not a mongoloid race... u can tell by looking at their face... their are aryan race dipil rai.I have many shakya friends... and i am not in doubt i know my race.
SandeepHumagain 1 year ago
Buddha was born in Nepal to a Shakya family. Shakya people are Aryan people Indo- Aryan. Although there are debates that he might have another debate such as mongoliam that is fake because shakya are colored and many texts from buddhas times say he was aryan.
Anway Om Shanti shanti... please stop the argument and learn from the video.
SandeepHumagain 1 year ago
@SandeepHumagain Shakya is Mongoloid race not Aryan. watch this video --> " 4.-Shakyamuni Buddha...Revolucionario Inédito (Segunda Parte del Episodio II)
and this will dispel all the misinformation the Aryan and now Indians has been writing about Buddha and Nepal.
And if you still have in doubt, Shakya still exist in Nepal.
diliprai 1 year ago
buddha z from shakya dynasty....
n he z fm <<<<nepal>>>>
no one can change the fact how hard they try 2.....
how hard they try 2 manipulate the fact,,,,
history z inevitable n histry nvr changes.....
jmssmhn 1 year ago
indian Fakers Gay.... they must stop it
MrGreenhole 1 year ago
Did he also know Sanskrit? In Bharat not just many one learns sanskrit. Not even the average man. You have to a high caste. Or Indo-European to have the right to learn the holy language.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lollipopbbygrl10 His fathers small kingdom was in Nepal and in India. And he was the prince of Shakya he was born into Hindu Kshatriya clan which they came from India.Many India