Falco: "Does not take away from the creativity." Maybe, maybe not. But the issue is whether it is in fact true or just conjecture created by people with an agenda. The best science is discovered when the scientist looks for the evidence that contradicts his/ her theory. Conversely, when evidence is cherry-picked and shoe-horned into theories it leads to bogus theses such as this one.
The Arnold example 3:00 - the camera can not adjust like the human eye, they use I believe a second camera and it is focused on the background. Some techs in the early 80' were working on a camera that functioned like the human eye to solve the focusing problem.
Falco: "Does not take away from the creativity." Maybe, maybe not. But the issue is whether it is in fact true or just conjecture created by people with an agenda. The best science is discovered when the scientist looks for the evidence that contradicts his/ her theory. Conversely, when evidence is cherry-picked and shoe-horned into theories it leads to bogus theses such as this one.
robitusson 6 months ago 3
The Arnold example 3:00 - the camera can not adjust like the human eye, they use I believe a second camera and it is focused on the background. Some techs in the early 80' were working on a camera that functioned like the human eye to solve the focusing problem.
GenericGene 3 years ago
Good demonstration -
GenericGene 3 years ago 3