Isn't this clitsucking dykes 'little boy' haircut cute? Or is this disgusting pig a cocksucking tranny? EIther way, since it enjoys calling people degrading sexual terms I felt it deserved to be called a few of its own. Nice adams apple BTW! LOL! GROSS!
When you hear the Teaheads say that they AREN'T Republicans but Patriots, or John Adams, or George Washington, or the Minutemen, or whatever.... What they are ACTUALLY SAYING IS, DON'T CALL US (BUSH) REPUBLICANS anymore!
They know the Bush legacy. It smells. They know what state of chaos Bush left of this nation. So they know that they CANNOT argue the following...
YES, RE-ELECT US REPUBLICANS, THE SAME MORONS THAT TRASHED THIS NATION. TRUST US.
Another fine example of the liberal "progressive." Compassionate, humanitarian and above all else, Tolerant. Unless, of course, your perspective happens to be divergent from her own ideology. You call this journalism? You should be ashamed of yourselves!
Where does your income tax go? It doesn't go to the infrastructure of the United States. It goes to pay off the interest of the money lent by the private bank the federal reserve to the United States Treasury.
He has driven up the deficit trillions of dollars that will have to be paid back in tax dollars by our children and children's children. Obama has spent more money than all presidents combined in the last 30 years! That's what the conservative party is pissed off about.
Someone needs a diction class before going to work.
Then again she already looks a bit too cute-butch and "perfection" would only make her "adorable" gay and this country has more than enough adorable gays.
No, she doesn't need a diction class, she is just using modern lexicon that happens to poke fun of Bush, who was actually the one who talked about looking things up on "the internets" - he also said that he hadn't used "the Google" very much.
-- TEA is not a right/left issue, it's a moral one
-- TEA is not anti-Obama
-- TEA does not state Obama raised or wants to raise taxes
-- TEA is NOT teabagging
Maddow FAILED in her basic job as a media person TO INFORM by saying what each letter in TEA (Taxed Enough Already) means. And laughing about TEA or tainting it by mentioning demonized groups along with TEA (i.e. KKK), by Maddow, will not change the fact we are Taxed Enough Already!
Do you expect anything less from the MSM? ... I think somewhere in our hearts we still look for allies and respectful honest people on TV,..... I doubt we'll find any as this shift torwards fascism keeps on happening.
Inflation is a tax, and prices are about to skyrocket as a result of all the new money creation. I'm guessing Rachel Maddow doesn't own any gold or silver.
and this koolaid drinking bitch has no clue what a 3.5 trillion dollars is... your taxes are going up... everybodys !!! and alot thay are going to tax things you NEED ..energy .meds. food.etc ... thay have already taxed your food with eathenol ...corn prices....you cant name one thing that does not have a hidden tax...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Your taxes are going down ... unless you are a billionaire.. or you are paid to put this stuff on youtube by fox news. I agree with Ron Paul types that we need to change the tax system... but I think it's pathetic that people believe Fox News saying their taxes will rise. What a joke. I also think people who don't want to contribute to society are infants in adult bodies.
Contribute to society... lol ... really? you honestly think that's what the IRS collects money? I mean... talk about infant assumptions regarding our reality.
agreed. People who only want to anarchize society without debating (that means, talking, listening and considering!) are saying "we want a failed state"
Perhaps they should move to Somalia-there's a good example of a failed state.
WHAT KIND OF IDIOT WANTS HIGHER TAXES FOR ANYBODY the I.R.S. is the worst ENEMY you will ever have...PMSNBC likes the I.R.S. only out of political gamesmanship.... if you idiots want to give more money the I.R.S. thay take donations !!! send them a check !!! but the liberals just like giving out other peoples money.... geithner.... and this smug bitch laughing and enjoying every second of the theft...glad she it he could help !!!
Rachel Maddow is a Patriot. The Fox propaganda machine is terrible and I am shocked they don't see this. The majority of these people are not even paying more taxes. Its a shame that all they have left is tantrums like this.
Most certainly, and yet that was a gift given to us by republicans, it looks like the dems are going to reduce the damage and hold inflation down... if you give them a hand.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Perhaps but taxation is not. So whether it is income or some other form of taxes...we all pitch in to pay for society. the good news? You owe a lot less his year. You can thank the electorate for putting Obama in the white house who kept his promises to lower your taxes. Or you could teabag... and help the billionaires.
Perhaps? Every single cent given to the IRS is used to pay for a gigantic debt perpetuated by same system itself, it's the biggest Ponzi Scheme in this country - modern day slavery. These might be harsh words but when looking deep into the subject the realization will make you feel nothing but the taste of puke in your mouth from pure disgust.
I don't have to thank a Republicrat for anything, yeah I said Republicrat because they are nothing more than a two faced party.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Actually, it is not unconstitutional. Look up the 16th Amendment, and the Supreme Court case of Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass - I have some links to send you, will send through pm since I can't send it to you here.
"If you...examined [The 16th Amendment] carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment." - U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox 2003.
The 16th Amendment is claimed by the federal government in the federal territory of Washington, D.C. to authorize their private collection company, the IRS, to collect "income tax". However if the 16th was not properly ratified the IRS has no legal authority to collect tax. The same applies to local County and State tax collectors who are also bound by the U.S. Constitution.
After an exhaustive year long search of legislative records in 48 sovereign States conducted by Bill Benson, (Alaska & Hawaii were not admitted into the Union until after 1913). the only record of the 16th Amendment ever having been confirmed was a fraudulent proclamation made by the Secretary of State Philander Knox on February 25, 1913, wherein he simply declared it to be "in effect", but never stated that it was lawfully ratified.
As I said before, Bill Benson was found to be a fraud in 2007. Even if he wasn't I wouldn't trust some random person making claims, especially when it comes to a legal matter - case law is what it is about and the cases DON'T support Bill Benson's views.
Ok, let's support the Nanny State instead and all its way to tax us. I'm happy to see our money wasted on fake wars and on interest to be paid to bankers I'll never meet :)
Who said anything about a nanny state, etc? I didn't support the Iraq war, and i am very concerned about the bailout (which Bush started) - however, I see the potential for being able to spend the money that has been legally collected on things that benefit us - such as new energy sources, updating infrastructure, etc. - and this type of spending actually gives us BACK $1.59, on average, for every $1 spent on it. Taxes simply aren't illegal - you just have to focus on WHERE/HOW it gets spent.
See my comment above about ratification. Also, the link I sent you (which you seem to not have read) has LEGAL information as well as FACTUAL information showing that the 16th Amendment was, in FACT, ratified.
True, if the 16th Amendment WASN'T ratified, THEN you MAY have an argument that direct, unapportioned income tax is unconstitutional - however, it WAS, making income taxes completely legal.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Instead of cherry-picking quotes out of thin air, please provide the case, page number of the quote AT LEAST - a citation would be best. Randomly cherry-picking quotes will not win you a case in court, all it will win you is a lot of laughter.
I already presented that to you, you are just to lazy to read it all the way through.
But like a told you before, you either work for today's government dissinformation campaign or you are just deeply brainwashed by this corrupted and slaving system.
I sincerely think you are not interested in the truth benefitial to We The People just whatever "truth" you can find to preserve the fantasy where our Nanny government takes care of us and protects us from all the evils of the world.
Uhm - again, you did NOT provide what case Judge James Fox's quote comes from - unless you can cite a CASE with the page number, it is not going to get you anywhere. I don't work for the government, I simply know how to deal with legal issues - you can't just walk into court and slap down some random quote from a judge without citing a case, page number, etc. and expect to win.
You can say tea bagger on the air but you can't call the president a dick? And get fired as a result?
What other news organization does this? Other than MSNBC I don't know of any other.
BeyondLame 4 months ago
Isn't this clitsucking dykes 'little boy' haircut cute? Or is this disgusting pig a cocksucking tranny? EIther way, since it enjoys calling people degrading sexual terms I felt it deserved to be called a few of its own. Nice adams apple BTW! LOL! GROSS!
fuklibs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When you hear the Teaheads say that they AREN'T Republicans but Patriots, or John Adams, or George Washington, or the Minutemen, or whatever.... What they are ACTUALLY SAYING IS, DON'T CALL US (BUSH) REPUBLICANS anymore!
They know the Bush legacy. It smells. They know what state of chaos Bush left of this nation. So they know that they CANNOT argue the following...
YES, RE-ELECT US REPUBLICANS, THE SAME MORONS THAT TRASHED THIS NATION. TRUST US.
New RENAME strategy: Call us TEAHEADS!
medartist01 1 year ago
Her guest's last name is Cox (cocks)! haha
whoo689 1 year ago
LOL! nice description of teabagging. "jockeying for AIR time" because they're gonna gag on the testicles.
whoo689 1 year ago
god i love her.
NioushaXD 2 years ago 2
Another fine example of the liberal "progressive." Compassionate, humanitarian and above all else, Tolerant. Unless, of course, your perspective happens to be divergent from her own ideology. You call this journalism? You should be ashamed of yourselves!
OrwellNation 2 years ago
Comment removed
OrwellNation 2 years ago
That is because Ron Paul started the movement! Republicans hijacked the movement!
wmalcom 2 years ago
Where does your income tax go? It doesn't go to the infrastructure of the United States. It goes to pay off the interest of the money lent by the private bank the federal reserve to the United States Treasury.
He has driven up the deficit trillions of dollars that will have to be paid back in tax dollars by our children and children's children. Obama has spent more money than all presidents combined in the last 30 years! That's what the conservative party is pissed off about.
wmalcom 2 years ago
INFLATION IS A TAX
THE WORST TAX OF ALL INSIDIOUS AND AMORAL.
Federal Reserve with no directive or oversight by congress lowers interest rates.
Obama=inflation.
chewbaca1989 2 years ago
Because The Fed Inflates and we have no controll over Fed policy we infact have taxation without representation.
Geschmolzen 2 years ago
Teabagging - Dick Army - Ana Maria Cox
wildhias 2 years ago
I read it on the internet's?
Someone needs a diction class before going to work.
Then again she already looks a bit too cute-butch and "perfection" would only make her "adorable" gay and this country has more than enough adorable gays.
1anotherview 2 years ago
No, she doesn't need a diction class, she is just using modern lexicon that happens to poke fun of Bush, who was actually the one who talked about looking things up on "the internets" - he also said that he hadn't used "the Google" very much.
technicschic 2 years ago
Maddow's lies & deception:
-- TEA is not a right/left issue, it's a moral one
-- TEA is not anti-Obama
-- TEA does not state Obama raised or wants to raise taxes
-- TEA is NOT teabagging
Maddow FAILED in her basic job as a media person TO INFORM by saying what each letter in TEA (Taxed Enough Already) means. And laughing about TEA or tainting it by mentioning demonized groups along with TEA (i.e. KKK), by Maddow, will not change the fact we are Taxed Enough Already!
RodCornholio 2 years ago
Do you expect anything less from the MSM? ... I think somewhere in our hearts we still look for allies and respectful honest people on TV,..... I doubt we'll find any as this shift torwards fascism keeps on happening.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
Inflation is a tax, and prices are about to skyrocket as a result of all the new money creation. I'm guessing Rachel Maddow doesn't own any gold or silver.
action762 2 years ago 4
and this koolaid drinking bitch has no clue what a 3.5 trillion dollars is... your taxes are going up... everybodys !!! and alot thay are going to tax things you NEED ..energy .meds. food.etc ... thay have already taxed your food with eathenol ...corn prices....you cant name one thing that does not have a hidden tax...
mike1111qq 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your taxes are going down ... unless you are a billionaire.. or you are paid to put this stuff on youtube by fox news. I agree with Ron Paul types that we need to change the tax system... but I think it's pathetic that people believe Fox News saying their taxes will rise. What a joke. I also think people who don't want to contribute to society are infants in adult bodies.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
Contribute to society... lol ... really? you honestly think that's what the IRS collects money? I mean... talk about infant assumptions regarding our reality.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago 2
agreed. People who only want to anarchize society without debating (that means, talking, listening and considering!) are saying "we want a failed state"
Perhaps they should move to Somalia-there's a good example of a failed state.
garthggarth 2 years ago
if the government takes 100% of your money then you are a SLAVE... if the gov takes 70% with hidden and income tax you are only 70% SLAVE !!!!!
mike1111qq 2 years ago 2
WHAT KIND OF IDIOT WANTS HIGHER TAXES FOR ANYBODY the I.R.S. is the worst ENEMY you will ever have...PMSNBC likes the I.R.S. only out of political gamesmanship.... if you idiots want to give more money the I.R.S. thay take donations !!! send them a check !!! but the liberals just like giving out other peoples money.... geithner.... and this smug bitch laughing and enjoying every second of the theft...glad she it he could help !!!
mike1111qq 2 years ago
Way to mis-inform the public ladie's
ImproveYourMagic 2 years ago 2
Rachel Maddow is a Patriot. The Fox propaganda machine is terrible and I am shocked they don't see this. The majority of these people are not even paying more taxes. Its a shame that all they have left is tantrums like this.
illinoisisboring 2 years ago
these bitches can read the Urban DIctionary, but when it comes to the Constitution, they are clueless coporate sponsored sheep.
dewboy910 2 years ago 3
Very true dewboy.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
Inflation (increase in money supply) is a hidden tax.
boots920 2 years ago 6
Most certainly, and yet that was a gift given to us by republicans, it looks like the dems are going to reduce the damage and hold inflation down... if you give them a hand.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
So how come Obama is protecting Bush from War Crimes ?
Just askin here, looks like we're dealing with a two sided coin.
boots920 2 years ago 6
...and the most evil one.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
manipulated by the billionaires to protest on their behalf because they can't get off their fat arses and do it themselves..
minteko 2 years ago
The Income tax is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Perhaps but taxation is not. So whether it is income or some other form of taxes...we all pitch in to pay for society. the good news? You owe a lot less his year. You can thank the electorate for putting Obama in the white house who kept his promises to lower your taxes. Or you could teabag... and help the billionaires.
Corporations8MyBaby 2 years ago
Perhaps? Every single cent given to the IRS is used to pay for a gigantic debt perpetuated by same system itself, it's the biggest Ponzi Scheme in this country - modern day slavery. These might be harsh words but when looking deep into the subject the realization will make you feel nothing but the taste of puke in your mouth from pure disgust.
I don't have to thank a Republicrat for anything, yeah I said Republicrat because they are nothing more than a two faced party.
Billionaires? haha!
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Actually, it is not unconstitutional. Look up the 16th Amendment, and the Supreme Court case of Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass - I have some links to send you, will send through pm since I can't send it to you here.
technicschic 2 years ago
"If you...examined [The 16th Amendment] carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment." - U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox 2003.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
The 16th Amendment is claimed by the federal government in the federal territory of Washington, D.C. to authorize their private collection company, the IRS, to collect "income tax". However if the 16th was not properly ratified the IRS has no legal authority to collect tax. The same applies to local County and State tax collectors who are also bound by the U.S. Constitution.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
After an exhaustive year long search of legislative records in 48 sovereign States conducted by Bill Benson, (Alaska & Hawaii were not admitted into the Union until after 1913). the only record of the 16th Amendment ever having been confirmed was a fraudulent proclamation made by the Secretary of State Philander Knox on February 25, 1913, wherein he simply declared it to be "in effect", but never stated that it was lawfully ratified.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
Bill Benson's has an excellent website, support him: The Law That Never Was
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
Sorry, I don't "support" random nutjobs who have crawled out of the woodwork.
technicschic 2 years ago
Name calling? ... figures! once you run out of arguments what else could you do right?
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
As I said before, Bill Benson was found to be a fraud in 2007. Even if he wasn't I wouldn't trust some random person making claims, especially when it comes to a legal matter - case law is what it is about and the cases DON'T support Bill Benson's views.
technicschic 2 years ago
Ok, let's support the Nanny State instead and all its way to tax us. I'm happy to see our money wasted on fake wars and on interest to be paid to bankers I'll never meet :)
Keep up the good work.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
Who said anything about a nanny state, etc? I didn't support the Iraq war, and i am very concerned about the bailout (which Bush started) - however, I see the potential for being able to spend the money that has been legally collected on things that benefit us - such as new energy sources, updating infrastructure, etc. - and this type of spending actually gives us BACK $1.59, on average, for every $1 spent on it. Taxes simply aren't illegal - you just have to focus on WHERE/HOW it gets spent.
technicschic 2 years ago
See my comment above about ratification. Also, the link I sent you (which you seem to not have read) has LEGAL information as well as FACTUAL information showing that the 16th Amendment was, in FACT, ratified.
technicschic 2 years ago
True, if the 16th Amendment WASN'T ratified, THEN you MAY have an argument that direct, unapportioned income tax is unconstitutional - however, it WAS, making income taxes completely legal.
technicschic 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Instead of cherry-picking quotes out of thin air, please provide the case, page number of the quote AT LEAST - a citation would be best. Randomly cherry-picking quotes will not win you a case in court, all it will win you is a lot of laughter.
technicschic 2 years ago
I already presented that to you, you are just to lazy to read it all the way through.
But like a told you before, you either work for today's government dissinformation campaign or you are just deeply brainwashed by this corrupted and slaving system.
I sincerely think you are not interested in the truth benefitial to We The People just whatever "truth" you can find to preserve the fantasy where our Nanny government takes care of us and protects us from all the evils of the world.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
Uhm - again, you did NOT provide what case Judge James Fox's quote comes from - unless you can cite a CASE with the page number, it is not going to get you anywhere. I don't work for the government, I simply know how to deal with legal issues - you can't just walk into court and slap down some random quote from a judge without citing a case, page number, etc. and expect to win.
technicschic 2 years ago
You are proof that the government is extremely effective in the art of mind manipulation.
You should work for the government, they can always use another diciplined and obedient zombie like you.
AgainstTheOligarchy 2 years ago 2
Nope, the government hasn't done anything to me - I've just studied the law and know my case law.
technicschic 2 years ago
These women are idiots!!!!!!!!!! WAKE UP AMERICA! MSNBC is joining CNN with this propaganda Bull Sh1T!
g14314PATRIOT 2 years ago