Freemasons working from the inside.... that would explain a lot. I went to a New Mass recently and it was just weird, and Protestantized. I would like to be Catholic, in my own western heritage, but guess I'll be staying Eastern Orthodox. As an outsider, the difference between an SSPX church I visited, to see a Latin Mass and my own ethnic heritage, versus the local Novos Ordo churches - WOW, it really is like different 2 different religions.
[A] At the meeting in the Vatican on "papal infallibility" (1864), the Catholic historian Dollinger, had to leave the church. He could not stand the monstrous way in which the Jesuits and priests there ignored the entire history of their own church to set up the doctrine of papal infallibility: later this was modified to "being only infallible when he pronounced OFFICIAL DOCTRINE."
[B] To this day no one has been able to put their finger on ONE OFFICIAL doctrine any pope spoke "infallibly" except the SINLESS BIRTH OF MARY (the Immaculate conception, making her equal with Christ) and her RAPTURE UP TO HEAVEN (the divine assumption making her equal with Christ). And neither of these blasphemous heresies are taught in the Bible or even hinted at.
Apostle Paul never prays to Mary, tells anyone to honor her or talk about her, and in thirteen Pauline Epistles, there is not ONE MENTION of Mary as a "mediatrix," "intercessor," "gate to heaven" or any other blasphemous title attributed to her in the official Roman Catholic books (nihil obstat) written by Catholic cardinals and bishops.
Vatican 2 demons will make all kind of ‘law’ to make possible the alibis for their crimes; like defining ’material-formal’ heresy, burying the altered demonic missals by replacing them with new hoax , impossible to detect if you have a weak mind, etc.
@10WiseVirgins You are a “material” heretic without knowing it if you objectively contradict what God has said but through no fault of your own; you are a “formal” heretic if you do pertinaciously contradict what God has said, i.e., knowing that you’re denying what God has said and wanting to do this anyway.
@WeepingStellaMaris From your own definition of ant-canon law 1983, IDIOTS are called ‘material‘ heretics , canning manipulators are called ’formal’ heretics. Ratzineger presents BOTH. His brain is dead from his own pedophilia crimes , and he does consciously his best to pull all to hell with him, as usually demons do.
@10WiseVirgins But could pertinacity not be presumed from the insistence of these popes on the new ways, and this in the face of all tradition and its present-day witnesses? Perhaps; but not socially i.e., as regards loss of office, etc., which must not be presumed but proven, otherwise societies would collapse.
@10WiseVirgins Now, the ordinary way for the Church to ascertain pertinacity and enforce the consequences of one’s heresy by either excommunication and/or loss of office, is through authoritative monitions* to the delinquent which he spurns (1983 Code of Canon Law, canon 2314, §1). But nobody can authoritatively admonish the pope (canon 1556), and the bishops can only be admonished by their superior, the pope (canon 1557), who has not done so.
@10WiseVirgins * To have canonical force, they must come from one's superior (cf., canon 2233). The point is not only the crime but also its imputability must be notorious (canon 2195; 2197).
@WeepingStellaMaris so is the case with the devil...You, heretics, who create this vertex of the hell, walking in uncertainty of fog, not us, the saints of the true Church.
All related to Vatican 2 and its illegally appointed masonic anti-popes - are 100% PURE HELLISH!
Does Jack Chick hate Catholics? Quite the opposite. In the mid-1970' when he first began to understand what Roman Catholicism really teaches, he knew it was unscriptural. He also knew that to speak out against it would be unpopular and hurt his publishing company. After much prayer, he made the decision that, no matter what it cost him personally, he would publish the truth that Roman Catholicism is not Christian.
So I have decided to negotiate with the Modernist Manifestly Heretical Anti poop
anyway . I believe by submitting to a heretic and calling him the VICAR OF CHRIST this will somehow help Rome to come back to the faith ??Dealing with the devil himself is O.K. sometimes especially if he is the poop of the Katholick Sect . I believe another 40 years of not calling him what he is and having "dialog" will do good for the church ? Fellay is crazy and is onboard with Rome ...secret agreements ?
I finally got a SSPXer to explain the resist but accept the modernist manifestly Heretical anti pope " Search4diabetescure said 1. Accepting Popes since V 2 are valid, but resist: Certainly. This is how it works. It's like your Mom or Dad have a contagious disease that have been proven fatal. Sure, you love them and live up to your responsibilities to them, but you just make sure not to get too close, and
I love the Society priests! Look at the good fruit that comes from them preserving the Catholic Faith. You can't deny that. The powerful Catholic sermons so guided by the Holy Ghost that one hears from these Society Catholic priests are food for the soul. God is with them. There is no arrogance about them. They are truly reaching out to the rest of those in the Church (our neighbors) to come back to tradition. That is what we are called to do.That is where charity is and virtues grow.
The "sspx" is part of the Vatican-2 heretic cult which was founded in 1965 at the Vatican. I list the outrageous heresy of the "sspx" on Section 105 of my website >> Immaculata-one (dot) com.
The Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy is operative against Fellay's soul. Lefebvre lost his soul, he's in Hell forever.
The "society" was started in 1970 as part of the V-2 cult to mis-direct the "opposition" -- keep them Vatican-2 and send them into Hell.
@Mike4Dogma You are a liar and a devil. SSPX 100% rejects V2 and they are NOT HERETICS. Lukewarm yes, heretic- NO.
I know who are you, Richard I, a CULT LEADER, calling yourself a Sedevacantist. In fact you are a DEVIL. You are BLOCKED and no longer you can post your utter blasphemy and lies against Roman Catholic Church on my channel.
Then the anti pope B16 lifted the fake "excommunications" only because
SSPX pointed out that all other schismatics and non Catholics are welcome but if one tries to be "too Catholic' you get excommunicated ! ? The New 0rdo "church"
had to retract . Now they will be in "talks" for another 40 years !
Freemasons working from the inside.... that would explain a lot. I went to a New Mass recently and it was just weird, and Protestantized. I would like to be Catholic, in my own western heritage, but guess I'll be staying Eastern Orthodox. As an outsider, the difference between an SSPX church I visited, to see a Latin Mass and my own ethnic heritage, versus the local Novos Ordo churches - WOW, it really is like different 2 different religions.
pilgriminexile 1 month ago
[A] At the meeting in the Vatican on "papal infallibility" (1864), the Catholic historian Dollinger, had to leave the church. He could not stand the monstrous way in which the Jesuits and priests there ignored the entire history of their own church to set up the doctrine of papal infallibility: later this was modified to "being only infallible when he pronounced OFFICIAL DOCTRINE."
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
[B] To this day no one has been able to put their finger on ONE OFFICIAL doctrine any pope spoke "infallibly" except the SINLESS BIRTH OF MARY (the Immaculate conception, making her equal with Christ) and her RAPTURE UP TO HEAVEN (the divine assumption making her equal with Christ). And neither of these blasphemous heresies are taught in the Bible or even hinted at.
HANDLEtheHERETIC 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apostle Paul never prays to Mary, tells anyone to honor her or talk about her, and in thirteen Pauline Epistles, there is not ONE MENTION of Mary as a "mediatrix," "intercessor," "gate to heaven" or any other blasphemous title attributed to her in the official Roman Catholic books (nihil obstat) written by Catholic cardinals and bishops.
RepentCATHOLIC 3 months ago
Vatican 2 demons will make all kind of ‘law’ to make possible the alibis for their crimes; like defining ’material-formal’ heresy, burying the altered demonic missals by replacing them with new hoax , impossible to detect if you have a weak mind, etc.
OUT!
10WiseVirgins 3 months ago
If it is infallibly declared that 2+2=4, then the new ‘pope’ pops up saying 2+2=5 , will 2+2=5?
NO, it will not.The charlatans :anti-popes and Fellay, the supporter of a falsehood- SHOULD LEAVE! ..to hell…
10WiseVirgins 3 months ago
You cannot prove that Benedict XVI is a formal heretic.
WeepingStellaMaris 3 months ago
@WeepingStellaMaris yeaaa...you can not prove that the devil is a devil. GOD CAN!
10WiseVirgins 3 months ago
@10WiseVirgins Actually we can prove that the devil is the devil. His very nature makes him the devil. That is why we call him the devil.
WeepingStellaMaris 3 months ago
@WeepingStellaMaris yea, so is the case with Ratzinger
10WiseVirgins 3 months ago
@10WiseVirgins You are a “material” heretic without knowing it if you objectively contradict what God has said but through no fault of your own; you are a “formal” heretic if you do pertinaciously contradict what God has said, i.e., knowing that you’re denying what God has said and wanting to do this anyway.
WeepingStellaMaris 3 months ago
@WeepingStellaMaris From your own definition of ant-canon law 1983, IDIOTS are called ‘material‘ heretics , canning manipulators are called ’formal’ heretics. Ratzineger presents BOTH. His brain is dead from his own pedophilia crimes , and he does consciously his best to pull all to hell with him, as usually demons do.
10WiseVirgins 3 months ago
@10WiseVirgins But could pertinacity not be presumed from the insistence of these popes on the new ways, and this in the face of all tradition and its present-day witnesses? Perhaps; but not socially i.e., as regards loss of office, etc., which must not be presumed but proven, otherwise societies would collapse.
WeepingStellaMaris 3 months ago
@10WiseVirgins Now, the ordinary way for the Church to ascertain pertinacity and enforce the consequences of one’s heresy by either excommunication and/or loss of office, is through authoritative monitions* to the delinquent which he spurns (1983 Code of Canon Law, canon 2314, §1). But nobody can authoritatively admonish the pope (canon 1556), and the bishops can only be admonished by their superior, the pope (canon 1557), who has not done so.
WeepingStellaMaris 3 months ago
@10WiseVirgins * To have canonical force, they must come from one's superior (cf., canon 2233). The point is not only the crime but also its imputability must be notorious (canon 2195; 2197).
WeepingStellaMaris 3 months ago
@WeepingStellaMaris so is the case with the devil...You, heretics, who create this vertex of the hell, walking in uncertainty of fog, not us, the saints of the true Church.
All related to Vatican 2 and its illegally appointed masonic anti-popes - are 100% PURE HELLISH!
10WiseVirgins 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
re: JACK T. CHICK PUBLICATIONS
Does Jack Chick hate Catholics? Quite the opposite. In the mid-1970' when he first began to understand what Roman Catholicism really teaches, he knew it was unscriptural. He also knew that to speak out against it would be unpopular and hurt his publishing company. After much prayer, he made the decision that, no matter what it cost him personally, he would publish the truth that Roman Catholicism is not Christian.
HANDLEtheHERETIC 3 months ago
So I have decided to negotiate with the Modernist Manifestly Heretical Anti poop
anyway . I believe by submitting to a heretic and calling him the VICAR OF CHRIST this will somehow help Rome to come back to the faith ??Dealing with the devil himself is O.K. sometimes especially if he is the poop of the Katholick Sect . I believe another 40 years of not calling him what he is and having "dialog" will do good for the church ? Fellay is crazy and is onboard with Rome ...secret agreements ?
SAYYOURROSARY 4 months ago
I finally got a SSPXer to explain the resist but accept the modernist manifestly Heretical anti pope " Search4diabetescure said 1. Accepting Popes since V 2 are valid, but resist: Certainly. This is how it works. It's like your Mom or Dad have a contagious disease that have been proven fatal. Sure, you love them and live up to your responsibilities to them, but you just make sure not to get too close, and
SAYYOURROSARY 4 months ago
SSPX recognize the pope and accept Vatican 2, but not how it was applied.
grandmasterc1982 5 months ago
I love the Society priests! Look at the good fruit that comes from them preserving the Catholic Faith. You can't deny that. The powerful Catholic sermons so guided by the Holy Ghost that one hears from these Society Catholic priests are food for the soul. God is with them. There is no arrogance about them. They are truly reaching out to the rest of those in the Church (our neighbors) to come back to tradition. That is what we are called to do.That is where charity is and virtues grow.
The1m2n3b4v 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The "sspx" is part of the Vatican-2 heretic cult which was founded in 1965 at the Vatican. I list the outrageous heresy of the "sspx" on Section 105 of my website >> Immaculata-one (dot) com.
The Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy is operative against Fellay's soul. Lefebvre lost his soul, he's in Hell forever.
The "society" was started in 1970 as part of the V-2 cult to mis-direct the "opposition" -- keep them Vatican-2 and send them into Hell.
Mike4Dogma 8 months ago
@Mike4Dogma You are a liar and a devil. SSPX 100% rejects V2 and they are NOT HERETICS. Lukewarm yes, heretic- NO.
I know who are you, Richard I, a CULT LEADER, calling yourself a Sedevacantist. In fact you are a DEVIL. You are BLOCKED and no longer you can post your utter blasphemy and lies against Roman Catholic Church on my channel.
.
10WiseVirgins 8 months ago
@Mike4Dogma
SSPX are *undeniably* the *WORST* heretics. According to Lefebvre and his lemmings, the "concilar church" is *BOTH* heretic *AND* the true Church.
The SSPX-Faith is V2-insanity cubed!
sedisvakantist 8 months ago
Then the anti pope B16 lifted the fake "excommunications" only because
SSPX pointed out that all other schismatics and non Catholics are welcome but if one tries to be "too Catholic' you get excommunicated ! ? The New 0rdo "church"
had to retract . Now they will be in "talks" for another 40 years !
SAYYOURROSARY 10 months ago