the strangest part of the resurrection was when the dead left their graves and walked into town to be seen by many. i wonder if any historians wrote about this event.
All born after the fact, none eyewitnesses. Just three guys passing along the legend of Christ. Suetonius is an especially weak source, as he often repeated the mistakes of his sources. He didn't even spell the name right.
After the fact but they didn't say it was a legend. It doesn't matter how Suetonius spells names. The body of Jesus was never found and that was guarded by crack Roman soldiers.
If you mean go back in time and relivl those events no, all the evidence has been presented, but you still choose not to believe, I suppose the even if you had been there and seen first hand with your own eyes you would still refuse to believe.
See the ProfMth series for rebuttal to your 'die for a lie' nonsense. Your lecture here is mere assertion without any reasonable persuasion. The only conclusion that "the intellect is driven to" is that the documents you speak of are transmissions of hearsay, constantly embellished and unrestricted by adherence to fact. The existence of a story about a virgin pregnancy is no reason to believe one actually occurred; that's silly, even if the story claims to be true.
IF the 'hearsay' was just by people who weren't at the events, yes, you might think of them as that. But these are people who died not only because of what the believed and wrote about. Also, non Christians of the time wrote about them as well. Again look at Roman historians who wrote about a man named Jesus. The existence of a story doesn't prove it but the lives of the people who wrote about it can. Instead of a story you have history, don't you?
What evidence are you claiming to have that says Jesus did not exist? The British Museum in London has documents-history books that claim that a man Jesus existed. Are they fakes?
the strangest part of the resurrection was when the dead left their graves and walked into town to be seen by many. i wonder if any historians wrote about this event.
wp4866 1 month ago
IT is a historical fact even attested by pagan Roman writers that a man called Jesus was crucified.
irishxxkelt 2 years ago
Name the Roman writers.
odinata 2 years ago
Tacitus, Suetonius and Josephus.
irishxxkelt 2 years ago
All born after the fact, none eyewitnesses. Just three guys passing along the legend of Christ. Suetonius is an especially weak source, as he often repeated the mistakes of his sources. He didn't even spell the name right.
odinata 2 years ago
After the fact but they didn't say it was a legend. It doesn't matter how Suetonius spells names. The body of Jesus was never found and that was guarded by crack Roman soldiers.
irishxxkelt 2 years ago
Ey suggest that yue wake up and show some respect to what yue can't disprove..
DocHoliday1882 2 years ago
If you have evidence, I'd gladly hear it.
odinata 2 years ago
If you mean go back in time and relivl those events no, all the evidence has been presented, but you still choose not to believe, I suppose the even if you had been there and seen first hand with your own eyes you would still refuse to believe.
DocHoliday1882 2 years ago
See the ProfMth series for rebuttal to your 'die for a lie' nonsense. Your lecture here is mere assertion without any reasonable persuasion. The only conclusion that "the intellect is driven to" is that the documents you speak of are transmissions of hearsay, constantly embellished and unrestricted by adherence to fact. The existence of a story about a virgin pregnancy is no reason to believe one actually occurred; that's silly, even if the story claims to be true.
cosmicjackpot 2 years ago
IF the 'hearsay' was just by people who weren't at the events, yes, you might think of them as that. But these are people who died not only because of what the believed and wrote about. Also, non Christians of the time wrote about them as well. Again look at Roman historians who wrote about a man named Jesus. The existence of a story doesn't prove it but the lives of the people who wrote about it can. Instead of a story you have history, don't you?
dailyreality 2 years ago
Excellent video, well researched and presented, well done. 5 Stars
DocHoliday1882 2 years ago
What evidence are you claiming to have that says Jesus did not exist? The British Museum in London has documents-history books that claim that a man Jesus existed. Are they fakes?
dailyreality 3 years ago
Comment removed
StoIenLogic 1 year ago