Please DO post these videos on Youtube, they're fun and perhaps informative too, just leave poor Veyron alone, you can't beat all the tech that's gone into it by putting an engine in your lap.
The comparisons are useless. Anyone could take a veyron to 300km/h while drinking a cup of tea As to this caterham most people would be shit scare just to cruise around. GREAT car? YES! FAST car? HELL YEAH! Compared to Veyron? As a car? It's nothing :x Remember Veyrons weren't made for racing ;)
I never really thought about it until now but I don't want to own one of these for one reason. You will inevitably need to one day get into another car. Whe you do you will die when you turn the wheel at 80 km/hr for a hard right hand turn and you sedan just explodes in failure as it cannot handle your caterham style driving. I cannot own a caterham because it wil ruin every following driving experience that takes place in any other car!
Yeah I know the reliability issue.. But when the Viper came out it had a 10 cylinder 8 liter truck engine with something like 300 hp. Thats just lazyness and rubbish quality. Its a joke. They pulled more hp out of 8 liters in the 60s. I know this Caterham is extreme but there are hardly any american cars that gets any efficent hp out of their engines. What is the big engine for then.. burning fuel ?
I will agree with you though on some of the crap being just quite sad. Point in case: 1978ish Chevy Nova with the 305. Only an American company could make an engine that size that makes the same amount of power as my stock CRV.
My father collects american classic cars and hes got a Dodge Mopar thing from 1964 and its got exactly the same performance figures that todays Viper has... Not much has changed in USA has it.
@Janusha i agree, one problem is that they should at least put up the roof because its so fast and light that it can get you mad because of the air movement
Well, I am approaching 60 years, and my old Super Seven twin cam de dion is approaching 30 years, but I think I could handle this things power no sweat. The CHP around these parts may have other ideas though.......
Ye this car rules and its veyron-beating but in what. Cornering speed and acceleration? I doubt you can beat a veyron acelerating, th veyron launches pretty well every time thanks to the traction control and awd. The veyron has more top speed, air conditioning, radio, security and yeah, cost more than 1 million xD
Who cares about all that? The Caterham would just thrash the Veyron on a race track. And who needs a radio when you have THAT engine noise? I think the Caterham could beat the Veyron in acceleration, if the right person drives it. The Veyron is probably much easier to drive though.
well seeming that the bugattis only got 550bhp per tone and this has nearly 1100bhp per tone i think round the track this may be the new lap record king of TG in IMO
Sadly the amount of footage we had wasn't enough for a proper feature-edit, though hoping to rectify that soon!
And yes, Stig would probably have a blast - would be interesting to see it beat the Veyron lap posted yesterday on Top Gear! That would put all the naysayers to rest ;)
still 0-60 under 3 seconds? so its close to 3 when they say that like 3.8 etc.
which means i still havnt seen anyone beat the veryons acceleration from 0-60
also is that car road legal? has to be road leagal to compete in veyron league.
i know several cars that are "faster" then veyron so i aint hating on every car that Vs. it. i appreciate what they do - faster to 200 or whatevr, or higher top speed. fair enough
I'd place good money that it has a faster 0-60 than a Veyron bobnos. It's 500bhp and 500kg, which is, what, twice the power-to-weight ratio. I'd say a 2.4 or 2.5. Veyron's claim 2.5 though most road tests done by press manage around a 2.9. Still, for an 8th the price this little toy does it quick enough, and I doubt much will keep up around corners and braking. And yeah I think it's road legal. I wonder how long before it flips if the speed limiter were to be removed.
when people say under 3 seconds (soz i said 3.8 i meant 2.8 - typo).. people usually mean something close to 3. half a second is no where near close in racing terms.
tests has shown 2.5 seconds. and the test for this car is under 3 seconds. i rather say 2. something then under 3.. obviously it was close.
anyways my main point was the car is a ultimate car. this is a car for speed only its focus is soo mediocre.
@bobnos FWIW theres a 4wd caterham with two hayabusa engines that does 0-60 in under 2 seconds. Also the Veyron 0-60 times posted is not actual times. IIRC they got that number on a dyno so it has the POTENTIAL to get those times but never actually does.
The Veyron may be fast but I bet you dont get the same thrill as this...
You buy one or the other in my opinion if you want to have fun you bay somthing like this, if you want comfort you buy a Rolls... the Veyron is nether one or the other...
I would have one of these any day over a Veyron!
(Well I would have the Veyron, sell it, buy this then spend the excess money on boose a bitches...)
@bobnos It is not in the as you called "veyron leaque" - a step above that - because it is a performance car not a fat GT for drag strips ovals and mommy's weekend shopping. ^^
now ask yourself the question how much quicker does this thing go round a corner than a caterham roadsport, or caterham r300/400/500. Answer, not much I suspect.
Wonderfully fast in a straight line for people needing twice the bhp per tonne of the supercar beating r500.
Personally I'll take a R500 and keep £70k in the bank thanks. As an engineering exercise I take my hat off to you.
I'll sell my zonda for this
hajimekishi 1 week ago
lulz @ Veyron fanbois, especially if they never saw / touched / drove / owned a Veyron, and never will... You know who you are, hehe :D
CyberChrist 3 months ago
what meansthe TBC in 0-60 under 3 seconds (TBC)??
fabioandres7223 11 months ago
nice video, but whitch is the specific time of 0-60 mph??
2.1, 2.2, 2.3,....
and everyone wish have one, why this car isnt produced in mass??
fabioandres7223 11 months ago
looolz another "Veyron beater".
Please DO post these videos on Youtube, they're fun and perhaps informative too, just leave poor Veyron alone, you can't beat all the tech that's gone into it by putting an engine in your lap.
Still thumbs up!
christosswc 1 year ago
ten chlap umí jezdit jen rovně ..
troubela 1 year ago
wtf is that in the passenger side at 2:07 watch it move around Is that his backpack or something? o.O
klownevil 1 year ago
Big engine in a small car...hmm...thats good
DizzlerDazzler 1 year ago
The comparisons are useless. Anyone could take a veyron to 300km/h while drinking a cup of tea As to this caterham most people would be shit scare just to cruise around. GREAT car? YES! FAST car? HELL YEAH! Compared to Veyron? As a car? It's nothing :x Remember Veyrons weren't made for racing ;)
resu19 1 year ago 2
omg the sound, incredible sound
Georgeous129 1 year ago
great track day car ,too bad they lack in the looks dept very kit car-ish
classiccafe1 1 year ago
I never really thought about it until now but I don't want to own one of these for one reason. You will inevitably need to one day get into another car. Whe you do you will die when you turn the wheel at 80 km/hr for a hard right hand turn and you sedan just explodes in failure as it cannot handle your caterham style driving. I cannot own a caterham because it wil ruin every following driving experience that takes place in any other car!
JJJCHEVY 1 year ago
brutal !!
IllIlIllIlIllIlIllIl 2 years ago
This is how Europeans do it. 2,4 liter engine with 550 hp.
Americans get the same hp out of 8.4 liter in the Viper. This thing can lap a viper easily on any track. It weighs less than half its weight.
Janusha 2 years ago 3
Yeah, the only problem is reliability. And I'm not ragging on it or anything, I'm just saying. An engine like that, one thing goes, everything does.
theoriginalca7erham 2 years ago
Yeah I know the reliability issue.. But when the Viper came out it had a 10 cylinder 8 liter truck engine with something like 300 hp. Thats just lazyness and rubbish quality. Its a joke. They pulled more hp out of 8 liters in the 60s. I know this Caterham is extreme but there are hardly any american cars that gets any efficent hp out of their engines. What is the big engine for then.. burning fuel ?
Janusha 2 years ago
I will agree with you though on some of the crap being just quite sad. Point in case: 1978ish Chevy Nova with the 305. Only an American company could make an engine that size that makes the same amount of power as my stock CRV.
theoriginalca7erham 2 years ago
My father collects american classic cars and hes got a Dodge Mopar thing from 1964 and its got exactly the same performance figures that todays Viper has... Not much has changed in USA has it.
Janusha 2 years ago
you must not pay any attention, its a supercharged v8 not a 4cyl
RyIzzle 2 years ago
Agreed. I am not even Euro...haha.
romanosalvatore 2 years ago
@Janusha i agree, one problem is that they should at least put up the roof because its so fast and light that it can get you mad because of the air movement
miketothesupra 2 years ago
@Janusha sure it's the same HP but we get nearly 3 times the torque
xnavigator 2 years ago
Its a myth that you need 7-8 litre engines to get torque. You can achieve the exact same with high revs instead.
Janusha 2 years ago
torque is useless at high rpm
I was talking about the low range 2-4k
xnavigator 2 years ago
Comment removed
Janusha 2 years ago
Why dont you explain to us how torque works and how its different from horsepower.
Janusha 2 years ago
well this is one car you don't wanna hit no bugs, given the whole no windshield thing
bobsicle001 2 years ago
Motorcycle helmet...
JSSV 1 year ago
Well, I am approaching 60 years, and my old Super Seven twin cam de dion is approaching 30 years, but I think I could handle this things power no sweat. The CHP around these parts may have other ideas though.......
paullubliner 2 years ago
Mad McHatters in de house!! Sell everything for aroad legal kart !!!
johnjamesindiatoo 2 years ago
Looks like a contender for the most dangerous car ever award, but I still want one!
bitchtastic 2 years ago
wow, wearing no helmet in this monster is really interesting :)
FuzzyStone01 2 years ago
I would be just crapping in my pants after this passing by from a meter distance at top speed :O
superaki93 2 years ago
Ye this car rules and its veyron-beating but in what. Cornering speed and acceleration? I doubt you can beat a veyron acelerating, th veyron launches pretty well every time thanks to the traction control and awd. The veyron has more top speed, air conditioning, radio, security and yeah, cost more than 1 million xD
DeScRuN 2 years ago
if they took both to drag strip, my money would be on caterham..
garhailija 2 years ago
The Veyron would be slower than this around most race tracks. That is what you pay for.
The Veyron is amazing but its not a track car.
IKNOWALLABOUTALL 2 years ago
Who cares about all that? The Caterham would just thrash the Veyron on a race track. And who needs a radio when you have THAT engine noise? I think the Caterham could beat the Veyron in acceleration, if the right person drives it. The Veyron is probably much easier to drive though.
kadvid 2 years ago
That car is the tits.
elsquibbs 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
two fireblade (bike) engines bored stroked than supercharged why waste that engine in a car
bikes are way better
whaleboy3000 2 years ago
Maybe you want the acceleration of a bike and the cornering speed of a car ??!!!
catografie 2 years ago 2
thats not 2 firebird engines m8, its a v8
gazmutd 2 years ago
Yah Freakin" Hoooo
(props to Ice Man)
And a Flappy Paddle Gearbox !
My insides are all squishy.
Screw the Corvette Clearance sale...
I WANT ONE.
Canadian Dealer Please?
(Summer's here)
droog57 2 years ago
holy friggen crap
icemanroyal 2 years ago
nothing like maximum power joined with minimum safety ^_^
andre83310 2 years ago 11
yes, yes...
KrazyHorse805 2 years ago
That is brutal.
Jaik666 2 years ago
*lusts*
TehRacooonODoom 2 years ago 2
that's what you call bump steering! 1:10
NFSELL 2 years ago
that thing has so much acceleration it's mind blowing
trxspirit 2 years ago 2
is that a paddle shift or an auto?
eric29armstrong 3 years ago
Very much a paddle-shift!
RacecarTV 3 years ago
well seeming that the bugattis only got 550bhp per tone and this has nearly 1100bhp per tone i think round the track this may be the new lap record king of TG in IMO
SeigeCJ 3 years ago
and oh yes its much faster the guy driving it is andy walsh ex f1 test driver and his hands are moving that fast (the vids not speeded up)
tom15rstv8 3 years ago
I own a RS500. Is this much faster and can I just have an engine shipped to me or must I buy the entire car.
Wolfwolfhoelaatisdit 3 years ago
would your car be able to take the capaticy of the 2.4 litre V8 in the Levante? maybe you would have to inquire to caterham about that.
SeigeCJ 3 years ago
The whole car is built from the ground up - though if you have the dollar it can't hurt to give RS Performance a call!
RacecarTV 3 years ago
Does this car have any actual lap times on paper, at any tracks?
speedtek007 3 years ago
In the near future we hope to post some actual track footage. Thanks for your interest!
RacecarTV 3 years ago
proper sports car and made in uk, nicely done
tomsjapcars 3 years ago 2
why no levante on top gear didnt caterham want to top the board
tom15rstv8 3 years ago
Nice vid, but why so badly edited?!
Would love to see the Stig in one of these!
b1gbrad 3 years ago
Sadly the amount of footage we had wasn't enough for a proper feature-edit, though hoping to rectify that soon!
And yes, Stig would probably have a blast - would be interesting to see it beat the Veyron lap posted yesterday on Top Gear! That would put all the naysayers to rest ;)
Thanks for the comments!
RacecarTV 3 years ago
where is veyron?
PTA35722 3 years ago
Way behind it lol naa they just mean it accelerates faster i think
JSSV 3 years ago
This video is to demonstrate the relative power. The actual power/weight is heavily in favour of the Levante.
Those who are expecting a Veyron - sorry to disappoint, but the hyphen in Veyron-Beating is important!
RacecarTV 3 years ago
those big lumps couldnt get round a circuit to even come close to this caterham
tom15rstv8 3 years ago 3
with a proper paddleshift, not the usual road car toy :)
thegearboxman 3 years ago
Good fun, but you may as well have a superbike. That's not a car?
mikekingphoto 3 years ago
a car w free supply of iron! i mean imagine how many bugs ud swallow driving this thing!
magnet6969 3 years ago
Hi - Not selling anything, just trying to get people to park in safer car parks...
If interested watch 'Criminals Operate in this car park' Thanks
angloengland 3 years ago
still 0-60 under 3 seconds? so its close to 3 when they say that like 3.8 etc.
which means i still havnt seen anyone beat the veryons acceleration from 0-60
also is that car road legal? has to be road leagal to compete in veyron league.
i know several cars that are "faster" then veyron so i aint hating on every car that Vs. it. i appreciate what they do - faster to 200 or whatevr, or higher top speed. fair enough
but acceleration still untouched.
also another title as ULTIMATE ROAD CAR
bobnos 3 years ago
I'd place good money that it has a faster 0-60 than a Veyron bobnos. It's 500bhp and 500kg, which is, what, twice the power-to-weight ratio. I'd say a 2.4 or 2.5. Veyron's claim 2.5 though most road tests done by press manage around a 2.9. Still, for an 8th the price this little toy does it quick enough, and I doubt much will keep up around corners and braking. And yeah I think it's road legal. I wonder how long before it flips if the speed limiter were to be removed.
ManicInc 3 years ago
when people say under 3 seconds (soz i said 3.8 i meant 2.8 - typo).. people usually mean something close to 3. half a second is no where near close in racing terms.
tests has shown 2.5 seconds. and the test for this car is under 3 seconds. i rather say 2. something then under 3.. obviously it was close.
anyways my main point was the car is a ultimate car. this is a car for speed only its focus is soo mediocre.
bobnos 3 years ago
but all in all they have produced an engine that is making a mark for itself. :D
but as a car -- veyron in my opinion takes it
bobnos 3 years ago
You should look up the Lingenfelter 427 Twin Turbo Corvette. Street legal and 0-60 1.97.
And no, that's not a typo.
screamosux 3 years ago
Bullshit! Corvetts are not that fast even with twin turbo! No traction....
iruss71 3 years ago 4
Look it up. John Lingenfelter knew his stuff...
screamosux 3 years ago
Quite right - that has some stomp!
Bloody thing would never take a hairpin-bend at speed though ;)
RacecarTV 3 years ago
It's a 2001 btw. It cost about $165k at the time, probably a bit more now.
screamosux 3 years ago
Yes - Road Legal. You get a 2-day driving course when you buy one!
RacecarTV 3 years ago
What about funeral costs?
billyposter 3 years ago 13
podes morir en cualqier auto pero igual el caterham posee un chasis tubular
47416390 2 years ago
HAHA., billyposter...best comment i've seen today, especially since it was a reply to the maker of the video.
alexzhu1 2 years ago
@RacecarTV Bit it's 0-60 doesnt match the Veyron nor does it have as high a top speed
VerticalB1rd 1 year ago
@bobnos FWIW theres a 4wd caterham with two hayabusa engines that does 0-60 in under 2 seconds. Also the Veyron 0-60 times posted is not actual times. IIRC they got that number on a dyno so it has the POTENTIAL to get those times but never actually does.
JD0x0 1 year ago
The Veyron may be fast but I bet you dont get the same thrill as this...
You buy one or the other in my opinion if you want to have fun you bay somthing like this, if you want comfort you buy a Rolls... the Veyron is nether one or the other...
I would have one of these any day over a Veyron!
(Well I would have the Veyron, sell it, buy this then spend the excess money on boose a bitches...)
Funkystumpy247 7 months ago
@bobnos It is not in the as you called "veyron leaque" - a step above that - because it is a performance car not a fat GT for drag strips ovals and mommy's weekend shopping. ^^
ckb313235 5 months ago
for get the car, how much will new kidneys cost?
jerrydoubleu 3 years ago
now ask yourself the question how much quicker does this thing go round a corner than a caterham roadsport, or caterham r300/400/500. Answer, not much I suspect.
Wonderfully fast in a straight line for people needing twice the bhp per tonne of the supercar beating r500.
Personally I'll take a R500 and keep £70k in the bank thanks. As an engineering exercise I take my hat off to you.
plwls 3 years ago
oh shit now thats fast
tom15rstv8 3 years ago