The problem is that man is a duplicitous creature. Unlike other mammals, man thinks in subversive terms about how he can exploit a situation. It doesn't matter that something was organized for a good purpose, if he can twist it to make a profit, he will. So with the stock market that was initially used to create capital and investment into enterprises that might benefit mankind, it has instead become a gambling casino that benefits the richest investors, while suckering the little guy.
this guy is great , the only flaw I can detect with the nature parody is that humans do not function as any other animals in nature. We have the need to be lead and to form large groups of the same mind set or become a collective with a dogmatic vision of our ability to transcend mother nature, all of our science and religion tries to point above our comprehensions to a singular understanding and nature never has a singlular anything , so human ego robs us of our own true nature , oh the irony
He makes a lot of sense and plenty of nations around the world know what it's like to specialize in one primary industry and then crash and burn when that industry tanks.
The rhetoric is what is bad, not what he was proposing, necessarily. The idea of redundancy, ok. decentralization, ok. but all this crap about nature "wanting" it that way is just silly. I could go on a similar path and argue that nature does not give a damn about something being too big to fail, 90 something percent of all that nature has dished out has gone extinct, maybe nature likes to see things fail...you get my drift?
I totally agree with you. He didn't provide any substantial argument here, and his analogy hardly stands any careful scrutiny.
But I think we're kinda judging it out of context. He might have had some good arguments, and only used the analogy to make the talk a bit more interesting.
In a sense, I think that's one big problem with FORA posting these short clips. If we fail to recognize them as promotional material that invites us to watch the full video, and start having discussions and drawing conclusions from them, we can end up being quite misinformed.
The speaker's rhetoric is terrible for public knowledge. All he gives are common idioms instead of actual arguments of his position. Speaking of nature as if it were a person that thinks and pretending to know what it thinks? that is just silly.
hahahhahahahahahahahahahhaha he is funny
mounickkumarreddy 1 year ago
The problem is that man is a duplicitous creature. Unlike other mammals, man thinks in subversive terms about how he can exploit a situation. It doesn't matter that something was organized for a good purpose, if he can twist it to make a profit, he will. So with the stock market that was initially used to create capital and investment into enterprises that might benefit mankind, it has instead become a gambling casino that benefits the richest investors, while suckering the little guy.
romeoechomike369 1 year ago
Strange to say, he reminds me of Andy Kaufman.......
vivaloriflamme 1 year ago
When in doubt, look to nature.
LiveFreeOrDieNow 1 year ago 2
this guy is great , the only flaw I can detect with the nature parody is that humans do not function as any other animals in nature. We have the need to be lead and to form large groups of the same mind set or become a collective with a dogmatic vision of our ability to transcend mother nature, all of our science and religion tries to point above our comprehensions to a singular understanding and nature never has a singlular anything , so human ego robs us of our own true nature , oh the irony
flogthedoggy 1 year ago
@flogthedoggy --- oh, I how I wish you were wrong!
csacta 1 year ago
Mother Nature has decided to push the restart button again - and it's very simple.
theroilsoil 1 year ago
Excellent!
fal2grace 2 years ago
He makes a lot of sense and plenty of nations around the world know what it's like to specialize in one primary industry and then crash and burn when that industry tanks.
blackiron60 2 years ago
can you name some of these "plenty of nations" that crashed and burned because of that?
Finiras 2 years ago
usa & banks, LOL
mathiur 2 years ago
recession or depression is not "crash & burn"
Finiras 2 years ago
Be patient...lol.
Late 2010 you will be shouting:
"Oh, the Humanity!"
kja5 2 years ago
HE SAYS IT ALL 1:16 - 1:18
MOTHER NATURE IS THE OPPOSITE OF DEATH.
HERE'S MORE PROOF -->
watch?v=R4QfeaF3MmE
truthtrekker 2 years ago
I wouldn't use Mother Nature as a metaphor for good economic systems.
After all, every organism in nature live only to consume other organisms, often in a long term self destructive manner.
dreamdewil 2 years ago
Comment removed
truthtrekker 2 years ago
The rhetoric is what is bad, not what he was proposing, necessarily. The idea of redundancy, ok. decentralization, ok. but all this crap about nature "wanting" it that way is just silly. I could go on a similar path and argue that nature does not give a damn about something being too big to fail, 90 something percent of all that nature has dished out has gone extinct, maybe nature likes to see things fail...you get my drift?
Bucketses 2 years ago 2
he should have shared data rather than this, but then again it is just a clip and he may be doing just that in the rest of the video.
Bucketses 2 years ago
I totally agree with you. He didn't provide any substantial argument here, and his analogy hardly stands any careful scrutiny.
But I think we're kinda judging it out of context. He might have had some good arguments, and only used the analogy to make the talk a bit more interesting.
merdufer 2 years ago
In a sense, I think that's one big problem with FORA posting these short clips. If we fail to recognize them as promotional material that invites us to watch the full video, and start having discussions and drawing conclusions from them, we can end up being quite misinformed.
merdufer 2 years ago 10
@merdufer Well put. I like your observation.
jaggnosis 1 year ago
The speaker's rhetoric is terrible for public knowledge. All he gives are common idioms instead of actual arguments of his position. Speaking of nature as if it were a person that thinks and pretending to know what it thinks? that is just silly.
Bucketses 2 years ago
YET MORE... mixed metaphors, glittering generalities and random analogies... masquerading as economics. Yaay.
voyeurdug 2 years ago
voyeurdug
"YET MORE... mixed metaphors, glittering generalities and random analogies... masquerading as economics. Yaay."
you're probably confused because you don't know the difference between keynes and von mises.
CRAPCANNONS 2 years ago