Let's Fight for our Freedom

[TheStranglehold]

Bob Fertik is a good little progressive. He hates the "Corprarashuns" spending their evil "corprarashun" money in elections, however, he has not an ounce of a probelm with deputizing them to act as tax collectors in support of his pet redistributionist programs, Social Security and Medicare.

[distantrhythm]

Corporations are already writing our laws, what's the difference if they select our lawmakers for us as well?

Don't they know best?

[DillonX]

We must kick THE CORPORATE WHORES out of DC.

[firejack007]

This is like an SUV in the news. People are corporations. They're not some thing that runs itself. We may not like it but words like 'we the people' and 'all' include people in any career or walk of life. I don't want my constitution to say that one group can't speak up for themselves and it doesn't. Who might be next on the premise that 'we' don't like them.

[Gilgamesh387]

"Let's FIGHT for our Freedom"

it only takes one psycho to take that message literally.

[Harpenboper]

@Gilgamesh387

lol thats awsom man!

[joncalx]

pretty sure who ever posted this is mentally retarded and knows nothin about campaign finance.

[Lucem2]

Corporations have already too much weight with the lobbies.

Campaign funding by Corporations National or Foreign is totally wrong.

[xp19375]

This is ridiculous. The court's decision only gives corporations the right to say what they want about a candidate. It has nothing to do with campaign finance. The elections are still in the hands of the people.

[MsWanderer1]

IT'S OUR REPUBLIC!

[MsWanderer1]

A democracy is rule by majority; that's why Rome fell. Our government's rule is limited by the powers given it by our constitution; that is supposed to protect all from tyranny by our government.

[msilving]

Corporations need to be regulated in many ways, but especially as it pertains to their power in Washington. The most obvious reason is that our corporations are made up of shareholders, investors, owners, and employees from many countries. One of several less obvious reasons is that the folks representing the corporations have a single purpose, to increase shareholder profit, which is not always in the best interest of their employees or the citizens of our country.

[PurpleJacketJoker]

@msilving Corporations only have political influence when politicians give it to them. Lobbyists are only as powerful as the Politicians allow them to be.. but it is hard for any politician to turn down Millions of dollars toward their next electoral campaign.

That is why we need politicians representing us that can't be bought.

[DillonX]

This was the worst decision in USSC history.

It allows someone like Hugo Chavez, listed by Time magazine as one of the most influential & powerful men in the world & someone who could drive US gases up to $8 per gallon next week, & who's a master at television propaganda, & who heads the USA Company CITGO, to funnel many millions into a Senator or Representative's Congressional race.

It makes me want to kick the asses on the Sup Ct who want to turn our country over to International Companies

[DillonX]

We have way far too many CORPORATE WHORES in Washington...and not all of them are Republicans.

[JCJ77]

I find it ironic that they are using graphics from Tea Party protests, when if they people they took pictures of knew what it was actually for they wouldn't agree to it. Just look at the list of clients though some aren't political you can see most of their clients are political in nature and progressive in philosophy.

[JCJ77]

The name of the company that produced this is "agit-pop" which is a play on the word "agitprop". Agitprop was a genre of propaganda used by the former USSR to spread communist ideas across Russia, its satellite states and to other countries. They were very multimedia oriented for the time traveling with a printing press to make posters and troupes of actors. This current group simply opposes the freedom of association and the right to petition the government.

[peterlows]

This bunch of so called " Supreme Court Justices" also ruled that the government can take your property and sell it to a private company,corps,another person or whoever for a profit... there should be a term limit on these guys,they get so damn old sitting on their asses making up laws which is not their job. Their job is to interpret the law, not make laws..lets place a term limit on this elitism.

[NamchuWangden]

peterlows

Rule the world

Obama victory-news made media headlines

Same day disaster struck him for ever bec IL. Lottery drew 666 so he shared front page with it "Obama Wins White House - Lottery draws 666"

So the Illinois people saw Obama, the Antichrist

666 is Obama's Mark of the Beast: MONEY

The Bible says "The Antichrist suffers a fatal head-wound". The Lotto's Obama's fatal head-wound "killing" him

Reveal this to everyone of the whole world and rule

[peterlows]

@Todd82TA ...Not sure where you're going with the comment...But by no means am I anti-Corp but I am Anti-Government when taking my house,real estate,land and sell it to a private investor for profit...I'll be damn I let the govt fuk me without a fight.Many wars over this kind of shit..But eminent domain for roads,power grids and progress is not the same as the filth in the Supreme Court ruled a few years ago..Learn the facts before you start bitching..BTW..I was once a Broker in NC.

[peterlows]

@Todd82TA ...I'm a conservative republican here,center on some issues.By no means a liberal or progressive or democrats or socialist or Obama supporter nor do I support the govt sticking it's head up my ass nor would / do I agree supporting big govt. nor do I agree with the Supreme Court ruling a few years back about taking private property from the people and selling it to a private investor for profit...Eminent Domain should only be for progress ONLY.

[Siru2008]

Welcome to corporate pluteucracy of America! Goodbye democracy!

[fuzzybekool]

LOL . Why wouuld anyone want to limit groups of citizens joining together to voice their opnion ?

Let's worry about our out of control Federal Government.

[quickboat22]

Well at least the corporations will fight for the capitalist systems that brought us the first 200 + years of prosperity. All the Dumbocrats and many Repuppetlicans promise us is a progressive "utopia" that taxes the productive and rewards the non-productive. Classic socialist bull!

[hobo59]

Tragically this video is a typical example of outright misrepresentation about what the justices decided in this case. But too few Americans will even lift a finger to do a Google search and read for themselves what the decision actually does say. So irregardless what the truth is, too many ignorant sheep will be led astray by this or other misleading propaganda videos and commercials.

[Boomer1949]

The first video I've seen that is an activist video about this ruling. This is the fight people, it has always been the fight.

[TAMARLANE]

How dumb can you be? To limit corporate participation on our political system is just silly.

[ThePackers123]

Pretending to be patriotic while denigrating a corparations right to free speech. That is classic.

[ThePackers123]

Corparations built the ships and the planes and the guns. You know where else there wasn't any corparations? The Soviet Union. It is funny how you call our side the brown shirts considering the Brown Shirts were socialists like yourselves.

[Manhattanite1]

Brilliant! Now let's see what the American brown-shirts have to say....

[xbluebells]

Please consider posting your video over at the YouTube Viral Contest on the impact of the Supreme Court Ruling. Search on YouTube for Corporations Aren't People. It is so wonderful to know that someone else finds this ruling atrocious. Thanks!!