Added: 3 years ago
From: EzgiiKa
Views: 78,376
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (282)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The last Sultan gave up power because he knew Chuck Norris was coming.

  • The corruption of Ottoman officials made all of the integrated peoples angry towards their opportunistic governors, however the sultan had no way to respond as his Janissary "praetorian" might kill the sultan. But there were random despots that convinced the people to rebel against the Ottomans for no reason at all. Even still many newly integrated peoples could get really high in the social ladder in fact most of the Grand Viziers were not even Turks.

  • The nationalist-minded minorities in the Balkans were just ungrateful. They were more interested in fascism than harmony and peace that the Ottomans gave them and that mankind should be living in. What happened when they gave themselves up to Europe. They started warfare and the biggest of them all being the World War I.

  • @ashsoccer960 stop your propaganda.we wanted to be free you fucker.whats wrong about freedom?

  • @panosmel97 Freedom made you lose your morality, etiquette and ethics when you use "fucker" to address people. Nationalism divided humanity and destroyed its faith. It is same as racism! Just learn from the Ottomans - how you should treat the people. The Ottomans accepted all kinds of people regardless of nationality, race or religion.

    So much cultural diversity and yet no discrimination. You love this New World Order where you are deceived with what you call freedom.

  • @ashsoccer960 use your brain.if the ottomans treated as well why would opposed them?and it wasnt just us.so did romanians,bulgarians and serbs. by the way taking babies away from their families and training them to be cold hearted machine killers is treating some one nice then what would u do if u were treating us bad?

  • @panosmel97 what is good then can be interpreted as bad now

  • @reashot yes it was good... for the ottomans.brainwashing children how nice.killing their parents WAAAAY BETTER!!!!

  • @panosmel97 Brainwashing is a very narrow point of view toward the Ottoman Devrishme system. Devrishme is a system where the Ottoman enslave christian & training them into a loyal soldier to serve the Ottoman Empire. This is a time where your "morality" doesn't apply. Killing parents is a just wild accusation.

  • @ashsoccer960 I agree, God bless the Ottoman Empire from the U.S.A.

  • Nationalism. It destroyed unity, humanity, mutual friendship, faith (Muslim, Christian or Jewish alike) both in Europe and the Ottoman Empire and gave rise to the modern secular nation states of a devastating world order namely the so-called Pax Britanica and the Pax-Americana

  • @ashsoccer960 The Janissaries became too powerful. With power came corruption. With corruption cane the fall of the empire.

  • They have showed the greatness of Islam - defense of the religion, freedom of religion and living to the Jews and Christians, peace and prosperity - and hence their right to the Caliphate is very much justified in Islamic theology

  • Notice the painting @ 0:22. The painter was biased towards Christianity - look at the color of the horses. The Christian one is white and the Islamic one is black. It's pretty clear symbolism.

  • thank you europe for driving those turkish barbarians into the dust where they belong, and stopping the spead of the islamic disease to the rest of the world, fact remains western christian civilization is superior to backward islam, even to this day just take a look at the medevil muslim countries today, if i was a muslim i would feel ashamed at such babarism displayed in the islamic world, many Outside observers know see muslims as little better than animal. Islam wants all infidels killed

  • QUESTION: WHY DO THE AMERICANS CALL THEIR NATIVE BIRD TURKEY

  • @Abbadon380 Because turks are heroes of heroes, Really want to know why? Do some research on the korean war and the turkish soldiers that fought allongside with america

  • @Abbadon380 They imported bird from Turkiye so engilish they ask what this bird where is it form be come their name turkey so in Turkiye we call bird Hindi becouse bird come from Hindistan(india) some happen to turkey from Turkiye(Turkey) I hope this will help your question

  • so there is no "typical" turk of today's turkey... it's one of the most ethnically mixed lands in the world

  • said by a blonde, blue eyed european who visited turkey four times and studied mediterranean heritage and asian cultures and religions

  • and persians even more

  • you ppl have to think that turks are a mix of europeans and arabs and persians, romans were there, the cruzaders were there and many stayed there and mixed with ppl aswell as other germanic tribes that went there when the ottomans occupied balcans... turks are mixed race

  • I watch how tolerate the Ottoman's were to Jews and Christians makes me wonder where Islam went wrong.

  • BEWARE ARROGANT TURKS. Nationalism destroyed the Ottomans. Turks who think that they are superior are in manifest error.

    Islam brought out the best in them (establishment of khalifa) and nationalism brought out the worst in them (Armenian genocide) Read surah Kahf where Allah talks about arrogance in the story of two men with gardens.

  • @Azamspazam91 I'm neither Turk nor Arab and my experience showed me that arabs are very arrogant and see non arab muslims as insects. I've never witnessed single Turk acting like that. If you read history its Arabs particularly Saudis(who were jealous of Turk rule as they think arab are superior so they should be ruler) helped British to demolish Ottoman rule. When your own people conspire against you then you have fall & it was not arrogance it was arabs conspiracy who brought this fall.

  • @symna Agreed, Arabs are proud too. I'm Indian and I personally know how nationalism has destroyed Islamic societies all over the world. It hurts to see Muslims killing each other and dividing among each other for the sake of ethnicity. We are just as bad as the Europeans if that's our mentality. I guess its easier for me to say this since I live in America on a diverse campus of college students.

  • I think one side was smoking more weed than the other

  • 7:17 Just another example of the failure of Keynesianism. HOW MANY EXAMPLES DOES ONE NEED!!

    '

  • btw the ottoman is still here right now in europe they are smart people they rely on assimilation and when everyone looks like them and everyone is it the governement sharia shall come and everything shall change

  • FUCKIN ASSHOLES ARGUING TO ONE ANOTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • cool upload

  • 3:40 And its all downhill from there

  • Comment removed

  • The Tsar's calling the Ottoman Empire the "sick man of Europe" was ironic.

  • Whence did the huge headdresses originate?

  • The osmans were lazy pigs. They used the Christians as slaves, raped their women, and put their daughters in harems, and their sons in the front line to get killed. The turks must pay damages, and return the land and property stolen, otherwise they will also be slautered like filthy pigs.

  • IS CANIBALIC POSSESSION IS NOT empire OFCOURSE

  • The map of Ottomans Impire drufing Sultan Suleymen is not right, the Caucas region was under the rulling of the ottomans, especially Azerbaijan.

  • Interestingly, America is also engaged in heavy borrowing to foreign creditors. One more good reason, to cut the deficit, and cut spending.

  • Comment removed

  • The muslims were more tolerant than the christians

  • @celebrei It's funny how things change, the christians became more tolerable than the muslims, and now, the most tolerable are atheists! hoho!

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside hah!!! if only you were correct... atheism is no different than religion, it consists of narrow minded assholes just as anything else is. It's like a childish game both sides play in! it's rather pathetic that you would say such a thing... its seems like both sides have people with pride through foolish views, in other words we're all biased so dont feel too high of yourselve you stereotypical fool

  • @wocLov I am right, even if some atheists are narrowminded assohles, THERE ARE WAY MORE DOUCHEBAGS that follows ISLAM than atheism. :] hence that's why atheist do not tend to fly planes into buildings or bomb themselves up, atheism breeds less fuckups, it's a fact that you njust can't deny.

    It's all really about the acceptance of secularism, to free a society from religious laws and also political like communism, nazism etc.

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside you're either a shitty troll or you really are stupid. I'm sorry to say that yu're a fool for blaming those religions based on such actions taken on by people who were raised by evil men, they are just coward criminals hiding behind god to "justify" what they do. Atheism really isn't as great as you think it is... I believe the people will eventually question what they believe in without the help of pathetic assholes such as yourselve who believe you're spreading peace.

  • @wocLov And you're a butthurt conservative christian/wathever who can't take criticism/facts and move on, it isn't random that islam and christianity are doctrines evil men can get much power from unless their society values secularism, because they have holy books that recommend you to beleive in their god without questioning and have holy books that can be interpreted any way you want, but atheism has no holy book. (Continuation)

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside i'm not defending religion any more than I was defending atheisim as I said they both have problems... you're showing a great deal of prejudice ideals you idiot :o

  • @wocLov You forget that I didn't deny that atheism have problems and never said that atheism is perfect, but your agenda is to make it look like I don't know about flaws of atheism and that I am one of them atheist pinkos who want to exterminate religious people.

    As I said american, I can read you like a book.

  • @wocLov Stop painting me as a warmonger, *Facepalm*, just because I give Islam and christianity critique does not make me biased and full of hate as you are implying, grow up.

  • And I understand your anger; Muslims all brag about how glorious and accepting they are and when atheists and liberal christians come and say that the muslims are not at all like that today, muslims get angry because of course there is no argument there, it is PAINFULLY correct. ;'D

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside =/ if only the world were a happy and peaceful place, it seems like for such a world to take it's place we would have to either dream of and die fighting for it, or part ways and live away from those in need of help and hope for a wonderful place to exist in the next life. If there is a god then he must pity the living for possessing such childlike ignorance

    Socrates once said "I only know that I know nothing" biased veiws blind us all

  • @wocLov And that's why I am not biased retard, I am an agnostic atheist, I cannot prove absolutely that there is no god, agnostic, but because of the lack of evidence I have taken the atheist position, a lot of atheists tend to have this position.

    That's why today, atheists tend to be more in favour of unbiased secularism than theocracy and state religions who are VERY biased, my dear sir. :D

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside well from what i've seen atheisim isn't what you say it is >_> and from your very words I can tell you are biased. Keep in mind it's a big world out there and it tends to be hard to actually state such a thing and blame only one group. You clearly don't know what biased means when you continue to talk trash on others and try to make yourself look like you are correct... You're just another media blinded peice of shit X] don't rely on other to give you the answers.

  • @wocLov I haven't even hinted what atheism is, lol! You are the one who started to talk trash, calm down, just look at this: "You're just another media blinded peice of shit X]" FAIL.

    I live in sweden, Europe, a very atheistic, secular and peaceloving part of the world, I know very well from observation that secularism and atheism breeds more understanding in a society, however as I said in the beginning, it isn't 100% garuanteed that atheism breeds more understanding, it is MORE LIKELY.

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside Yes I was clearly talking trash on you and not atheisim. You dumb fuck >_> but what ever i'm done trying to explain something you'll never understand because you're too busy trying to imply that by being atheist the world would be much more successful when infact it would most likely spawn its own problems with time. I'm done now.

  • @wocLov Yes "I was clearly talking trash on you and not atheisim." //Facepalm

    Yeah you're running away like a chicken, we know.

    "trying to imply that by being atheist the world would be much more successful when infact it would most likely spawn its own problems with time. I'm done now."´

    It is more likely to be secular, just look at europe retard. The discussion was about secularism, nice trying to put words in my mouth, liar. Yeah run away from the discussion, make you look good!

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside you're a disscrace to atheists worldwide! and your mother is a whore! :)

  • @Imhornydadcomeinside

    Turkish people are still and always are tolerant. Ottoman Turks are great example of that.

  • @ismetdere ou mean the ottoman empire that no longer exist?

  • YASASIN OSMANLI DEVLETI

    LONG LIVE OTTOMAN EMPIRE / TURKEY

  • DUDE, that guy has a fat hat! lol 1:45

  • @trceb Dude Sucker That's Not A Fat Hat ...

  • biz kan Türk susamış durumdayız

  • @AllochGs yeah ... your Turkish sucks and makes no sense.

    It's quite ironical you're acting all innocent and post a comment in broken Turkish afterwards saying that you have thirst for our blood and that revenge will come soon.

    Hahaha moron, that's what got your ancestors deported.

  • the majority of mostly christian in turkey where armenians we where massacred our medivals menestery are destyoed our churches our ancestors hanged raped killed burned beheaded revenge will com soon!

  • greece serbia all balkan nations all arab nations armenians other nations who live in ottoman empire you never live happy and proud like ur ancestor ! europe want u hate turks because they dont want u to see truth ottoman was free land true livings when europe kiliing peopels in africa and america ottoman was protecting all race in her lands !

  • 04:25 Само като чух гайдата и настръхнах.:)

  • Interesting video

  • Take those special taxes and stick them up your arses, you fucking cuntrag.

  • @Gloriamagnificens lol you sound a bit bitter

  • Ottoman Empire succeded because Crusaders give such a blow to Byzantia , conquered and destroyed Constantinopole that it never recovered..Half of the first ottomans were exchristians or with christian decent...ottomans will allow criminals and outlaws to join and leave on looting

  • @kirilmv Actually Seljuks had already defeated the Byzantine few times when Byzantine was still strong. You can't say that Ottomans could not succeed otherwise.

  • OTTOMAN İS THE BEST

  • whole europe united against ottoman empire. only than they were defeated. but turks came on their own and destroyed roman empire, byzantine empire and far more. and still after WWI, whole europe lost against turks. thats why we are turks and you are not

  • @199219931994S All of Europe did NOT unite against the Ottoman Empire. In fact, the European forces that contributed were less than those of the Ottomans, and the Europeans still won. Battle of Lepanto is a good example.

  • @Krshwunk foolish man. battle of lepanto, ottomans fought with swords. because the arab soldiers refused to use guns. thats why europe won. no turks NEVER lost against 1 enemy. show me 1 example. always multiple nations against turks. ALWAYS ! but still we dominated.we brought democray to europe, laws and schools. we brought culture, hygiene in europe. these are the facts

  • @199219931994S yeah great argument....what about the principality wallachia , moldavia and transylvania . If you know your turkish history than you have to know that guys like Stephan the Great , Vlad the Third aka Dracula , Michael the Brave , Mircea the Elder and even John Hunyadi all of them defeated the turks at least once in their lives and without the exception of John Hunyadi all of them dint had support from other nations . There are a few battles that we romanians won that are awesome

  • @GhostZ0 its what you call a victory. because turks conquered those areas few years later. dracula was a sick man who loved eating blood and torturing. is that the romanian pride?

  • @199219931994S again you are just talking about things you don't know...the ottoman's NEVER conquered Transylvania , moldavia and wallachia always retained some sort of independence even in the XVIII-XIX century's . we where never conquered , we always stoped the ottoman's from fully conquering us , unlike the other nations of the Balkan's . And you should never talk about Vlad because you don't have the slightest idea on who he was....The stories are all fake and yes i am proud of Vlad

  • @GhostZ0 you are the wrong one. they were all vassal states. to be a vassal state doesnt mean you stoped their conquests. it means your land was far from capital so you had to be vassal. algeria, tunusia they were all vassal states like moldovia, slovakia, hungary and transylvania. you talk ridicilous but history says turks conquered your lands and keep it for a long time. and yeah stories about vlad is true and i see him as a man who defended his country but of course he was our enemy.

  • @GhostZ0 and you talk like serbs,romanis,ukrainians and hungarians. you all say "we stoped em on our borders" how it possible if we hadnt come over all of your borders ? are you same countries ? you destroy your own theories dont talk ridicilous. black sea was our "lake" and we took some parts of austria too.

  • @floodkhan dude....you don't understand the meaning of the word conquerd....did we adopt your religion? did we bow to the sultan?....we only paid a tribute(haraci) to you and for a period of about 100-150 years the sultan appointed his own men as rulers of wallachia and moldavia....and of course wallachia and moldavia where not turned into an eyalet...they where autonomous....i am not trying to say that the turks where weak or anything else...they had one of the greatest empires in history

  • @GhostZ0 that's the point. you say we didnt adopt their religion. what about greeks or serbs ? did they adopt islam ? no. are they talkin turkish ? no. even they were our part for many years. ottoman never forced nations to change their names, languages and religions. only there were janissaries which were takin from christian families to become muslim soldiers but that's all. There are many sources say wallachia an transylvania were tributary or vassal states.

  • @floodkhan i already said that yes they were vassal states....but there is a difference between counquerd nation and a vassal nation

  • @GhostZ0 anyway but if you understand to asilimate when you heard conquerin a nation ottoman never did it to any nation.

  • @199219931994S You do know the Battle of Lepanto was a naval battle and the Ottomans did use guns and cannons. Much of the battle was hand to hand because naval warfare at the time still consisted largely of ramming ships and boarding them. The battle turned against the Ottomans when the Spanish managed to board and capture the Ottoman command ship Sultana beheading the commander Ali Pasha which destroyed Turkish moral. Also the Turks fought several 1 on 1 wars with Russia that they lost.

  • @Krshwunk I don't know where you get your source to say in the Battle of Lepanto the Ottoman forces were more. I believe the numbers were close match. Secondly, In Naval warfare the numbers of soldiers or vessels are not alone indicative of the fire force.

  • @kahraman Europeans had 208 ships (and about 20,000 soldiers). Ottomans had 251 ships (and about 30,000 soldiers). It is nonetheless true that Europeans had better and more guns, since science in general was more advanced in Europe at time.

    The only Europeans powers to take part in Lepanto was Italy, Spain (who contributed only few of their ships), and the tiny island of Malta. The Ottoman Empire was several times larger than all of them combined.

  • @Krshwunk I believe saying science in general was more advanced in Europe at time is an overstatement. As I said this is was a naval war and you can see that number of guns the Holy League were around twice as many as of the Ottoman fleet's. I believe the number of men you are given are soldiers where as the number of sailors were about the same. Ship number alone does not say much, as the Holy League's ships were larger than the Ottoman Fleet's ships.

  • @Krshwunk In addition, the size of the countries are irrelevant in here. The ottomans were also fighting with the nations who had a long experience of the waters and naval warfare.

  • @kahraman Yes, I agree that Spain, Italy, and Malta were better than the Ottoman Empire at naval warfare.

  • @Krshwunk I disagree. You can't make that kind of statement. Ottomans had defeated the holy league and alliance in Battle of Preveza (1538) and Battle of Djerba (1560). Besides, Battle of Preveza the Holy League's were much bigger than Ottoman forces.

  • @kahraman I was talking about the time of Lepanto (1571). By that time, the European naval systems were better than that of the Ottoman's. The Ottomans, due to Islamic fundamentalism that condemned scientific innovation, caused the Muslim world to lag behind in the technological advancements made in Europe.

  • @Krshwunk Please look at Battle of Preveza (1538). The Holy League's forces were much larger than that of Ottoman's but they were defeated by the Ottomans. It was a major defeat for the Holy Leage. Venice lost Morea, Dalmatia and many of their islands to Ottomans.

  • @199219931994S LOLL

  • @199219931994S both roman empire and byzantine empire? i got a bug.

    and far more? which one?

  • @199219931994S what happened to turkey now?

  • @199219931994S your an idiot lol, after WWI the Turks lost to the Brittish; and no one wants to be a turk, they are looked down upon xD

  • @EZBreezy187

    What do you mean they are looked down upon? They have some smart ass peoples, + they are a huge ally to Europe and the United States.

    Look up United States - Turkish relations and European-Turkish relations.

    Another typical American talking out his ass.

  • @EZBreezy187

    And there is no "Turk" unless your talking about Asiatic Turks.

    The "Turks" in Turkey aren't even Turkish. Turkey is a country that is a melting pot, same as the United States. The Turks have European blood, and middle-eastern blood.

    I've been to Istanbul with a class to study their architecture. There is no typical turkish person, one turk has brown hair, one has blond, one has black, blue eyes, green eyes, brown eyes.

    Just another American talking out his ass.

  • @Kamissick turkish person, one turk has brown hair, one has blond, one has black, blue eyes, green eyes, brown eyes.

    Just another American talking out his ass.

    -hahahahahahaha this was so funny good job brother

  • @EZBreezy187

    Also there is no Turk. Turkey is a melting pot like the United States, everyone in Turkey carries European DNA and Middle-Eastern DNA.

    I've been to turkey to study their architecture. One Turk has blond hair, one has brown, one has black. One has brown eyes, one green, one blue..

    Get it? Dumb ass Americans...

  • @Kamissick I don't know where the fuck your getting your information from, but you are so wrong it's laughable. Turk's don't have blonde/brown hair and green/blue eyes. They belong to the same cluster of people as the arabs, and they are darker than most Europeans with dark hair/eyes and defining features which relate them to most of their relative nations in the middle-east. just because some people living there don't meet this criteria proves nothing, they are not of Turkish origin =]

  • @EZBreezy187

    Ok keep talking out your ass, fucking clown.

    Have you been to Turkey? No, so shut the fuck up. I've been there and seen Turks myself and talked to them.

    Watch this.. on youtube, watch?v=w4GT3L7yHOU&feature=ch­annel_video_title

    This is a street cam of Turkish people going on their daily lifes. I don't know why you fucking dumb ass Americans are obsessed with race and always think you're right but, go to the country, and explore them to learn about them. not talk out of your ass.

  • @EZBreezy187

    And seriously dumb inbred cunt, i don't know where you get your rediculous information. It's so laughable to the world. By saying Turks don't possess light color features is ignorant. By saying Turks are Arabs is ignorant. Because in fact, Turks are genetically closer to Europeans then any middle-eastern.

    And you think people with dark hair/eyes are not European? Where the fuck have you been living, under a rock??

  • @Kamissick no... just no lmfao. I didn't say Europeans don't have dark hair/eyes or that Turks don't posess these light color features you speak of. All I said was that Turkish is a nationality which does have a native population, unlike Modern-America which is consisted entirley of Immigrants. Yes the Turks occupied many countries, such as Greece for example; but that does not make those Greeks Turks. The 'light-skin' people you refer to are most likley of Greek origin. :)

  • @EZBreezy187 you are right that blond hair are not frequent in turkey, but that they belong to the same cluster as arabs is bullshit... arabs are semitic roots, so afro-asiatic, they belong to the great white race, mediterranean family... the real turks are a 100% asian people and they are relative to the mongols and chinese rather than to any other ethnic group... and what you see today in turkey are not turks, but a total mix of ethnies who speak turkish and identify themselves as turks...

  • @EZBreezy187 there is no relative nation to turks in the middle-east.your comments are so american(ignorant about the world, specially the middle-east)... in the M-E, there are arabs, jews, kurds and persians as ethinc families... and just talking about relative nations arabs are physically more european than with turks... persians and kurds not only are of arian origins, but speak indoeuropean languages, what turks absolutely don't... so arabs are more relative to us(europeans) as to turks...

  • @199219931994S And yet you lost against the little Island of Malta

  • @juvekyle05 little island of malta? it's obvious that you don't know the history of your own country. Now it may sound funny but Malta was very powerful during that time.

  • @juvekyle05 Yes indeed and when the Ottoman empire where the sick man of Europe. The Europeans still feared them. Even England and France.

  • @199219931994S do you know about antep in turkiye im going next summer

  • @199219931994S

    Easy there, Seljuk, be proud, but don't forget that time is now over.

  • 1:11-1:19 very important

  • HAHAHA THEY BORROW THAT IS AGAINST ALLAH

    INTEREST MONEY AND WONDER WHY THEIR EMPIRE FALL

  • So there were no massacres or expulsions by the Ottomans?

    WTF is this?

  • @TheLoyalOfficer ohh.. wellcome to fact of history. sorry for ur washed brain... this is history channel. all tells about the facts. not the lies of religious priests. :)

    no massacres. a big tolerance and freedom. wellcome to ottoman world. !

  • @muzaffer0618 Yeah - like the Armenians???

    Yeah - "a big tolerance and freedom."

    Ask the Balkan peoples if they want the Turks back to rule over them! Once they finish vomiting, they will punch you in the face!

  • @TheLoyalOfficer you can ask to this video. ;) the real historians are speaking here. not the lier priests or ur lier pope.

  • @muzaffer0618 Haha - give me a break...

    This is just more Hollywood self-hate. They will do anything, including embracing your rotten empire, just to disrespect Christianity.

  • @TheLoyalOfficer do you really go to school there ? or you are just trying to be funny ? :) crusaders.. blah...

  • man, the ottoman empire fucked shit up for centuries, badass.

  • wrong. we captured also marroco. coz we get iams from marakech(marocco.

    most of istanbul imams were marocco's imams.

    we never took mekke, nor medina we respected it. but helped to improve medine and mekke.

  • what is the name of the song that comes up at 3:40?

  • As far as balkan history ottomans spread terror and musliam religion.

  • 7:58 Albanian soldiers ; )

  • somehow the ottoman empire was alot like the us, in regards to being a melting pot of different cultures, and in regards to being multiple states joined under one banner... so if history repeats itself, it wont be long until the usa separates into multiple autonomous states. as far as i remember the founding fathers of the usa never meant for it to become a country, perhaps the were right all along

  • go away yahoudy u don t ask the really story, laying laying

  • Europeans always kill people who they think r not Europeans

  • but then when israel became a state.... the muslims pissed on them!

  • so proud of my ancestors and my heritage.

  • the ottoman empire was one of the strongest empire in th world. They conqured.

    bosnia,austria,lebanon,rome, uzbekistan, azerbajan,syria,mecca,jueresal­em, greece and cyprus serbia,crotia,sloniena and also were the defenders of islam all the way then some dickhead arabs strted taliban the other terriorist groups and turkey is still strong in these days and have never lost a war.

  • This is a pretty poor attempt at a history of the OE, obviously dumbed down for an American audience. Watching it you get the impression the Ottomans did everyone a favour by conquering them and that the ungrateful vanquished rebelled because they felt a sense of superiority over their Turkish masters.

    Just ridiculous.

  • all those who hate ottoman ampire

    got her granny captured by ottoman playboys

  • Like the dispicable vultures that they are, the western powers wouldn't leave the Ottoman Empire alone until they stripped the state bare and there was nothing to scavenge for left.

  • They don't mention the atrocities the Ottoman Empire perpetrated against the citizens of Constantine. Rape of children, boys and girls, slavery, murder. This movie is biased against Christians and very pro-ottoman and Islam.

  • its all twisted incorrect...

  • since 1453 böööööhhhhyt :))) FATİH SULTAN MEHMET hesabı hehehe kamiller sizi fuck greece KIBRIS TÜRKTÜR ULANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

  • Ottoman empire was strong as long as their war machine was victorious. As they started to lose battles, as at Wiena of Hochim, whole empire was getting less and less strong. Poland and Austria, suported by rebels on the Balkans, at the end of 17th century manage to make the Ottomans too weak for going into new wars. It was the begining of Ottoman Empire end.

  • @Velagast thats true but Vlad Dracula is the only european person to show the ottoman the word fear and terror by impaling them!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Is there any unbiased doc on the ottomans on youtube?

  • 600 hundreds years boss of the world

  • Hahaa... here they tell how Muslim ruled other people. Pay tax, clothes and war. Sounds like submission to me.

  • this is bias crap fuck ottomans

  • please give your arguments. i would love to hear them

  • @ADZ01982 hater

  • Those Jews that entered Turkey betrayed the Sultan's kindness. They became Donmeh , they pretended to be Muslims. Then they got their financial hooks into the Sultan's empire and created the "Young Turk Movement" which was staffed heavily with Jews... including half Jew Mustafa Kemal the homosexual Jew. Jews , both in Spain and Greece undermined the native Christian peoples and helped The Muslims rule over the peoples there. This is why kikes are hated !

  • one thing i dont get is why didnt ottomans help spain muslims and send army to re-gain muslim spain?

  • 1821

  • They started borrowing...and borrowing is addictive....then they leased important strategic areas/economic enterprises to foreign powers to ease the mounting debts...sound familiar?

  • No way to do it against europe's colonies.

  • 1922

  • 1821

  • yeh they put up with u if u payed tax they would let u live dont matter who u were.

    look up kocek for there transvesite fetish of the turks!

  • It's funny how the Americans are doing the same thing apparently... Trying to reform the educational system, healthcare etc. And borrowing money like crazy from China and othre countries... I think this is the beginning of the end for the USA

  • in the end, the downfall of the turks was their tolereant waus toward other divisions. which is a good thing, but also served their fate.

  • Comment removed