Another thing, I find that the popping out titles do not work too well with cross-eyed, but work better with glasses. I think this is because with cross-eyed your eyes are kind of confused about normal depth and there is nothing to compare the titles too. If there was an unmoving background I think it would help. Also, with the glasses, optimized (Dubois) or black and white has a much better 3D than full color.
@bugeman0 I agree with you that the titles would have looked better against a stationery background. I also agree with you that Dubois and B&W are better looking options when using 3D glasses.
Awesome! I was thinking of doing this, but I didn't want to buy a separate camera, and anyways I thought of something even wilder, but it might not be coming out anyways :(.
I'm very good a cross-eyed, unlike everyone else I know, and I have red-cyan glasses. Anyways, I would be interested in your technique. Did you use two cameras? If so, I think it would be hard to find software, or if you moved the camera each frame, I think there would be camera shake. Also, there is a face on the left image
@bugeman0 I used 2 QCPro 9000 both ripped out of their cases. I flipped one upside down so I could get the lenses as close together as possible, and then built a LEGO case to enclose them together. A PC will only see one QC9000 at once, so I borrowed a 2nd computer from a friend for the right image, my own PC for the left image, and then for each frame, I had to remember to capture it on both PCs. But I just used all my typical software to pull it all together.
@snl3 Why would I not release a 3D film in 3D after doing all that work to film it in 3D? You can view it in 3D using the cross-eyed technique without any 3D glasses (see film info section for help with this technique).
If that doesn't work for you, you can still watch the film in 2D, just select the "right image only " or "left image only" from the YouTube 3D player pop-up located right under the video to the right of 480p.
@flooppy1 Actually, yes, if you want to see it in 3D the cross-eyed technique requires you very slightly cross your eyes. Seriously. Imagine you were to focus on your finger that you hold up about 8 inches in front of your face. That's about how much you need to cross your eyes for this technique.
@flooppy1 Nope, just apps I already used. I used PaintShopPro to figure out exactly how I'd need to crop all the Left and Right images so that things would line up properly. I used Virtual Dub to actually do the cropping of all the images. I then used an old version of Premiere to shrink the Left video clips over to the right hand side and then to overlay and shrink the Right video clips to the left-hand side. By the end, I'd gotten the 3D process down to a science. :)
@ancientbricks My my, it seems quite complicated if you ask me, Haha!!! But it seems like you know exactly what your doing. Unfortunately I couldn't get it to work on the cross-eyed 3D to work, for some reason I couldn't keep my eyes crossed. XD
i was thinking of doing this, 3D thing, i didn't though, so this makes me happy.
bwjclego 1 year ago
I can't wait to see this! Better find my 3D glasses, I hope I still have them from that Atlantis thing.
JokerVlogger 1 year ago
Another thing, I find that the popping out titles do not work too well with cross-eyed, but work better with glasses. I think this is because with cross-eyed your eyes are kind of confused about normal depth and there is nothing to compare the titles too. If there was an unmoving background I think it would help. Also, with the glasses, optimized (Dubois) or black and white has a much better 3D than full color.
bugeman0 1 year ago
@bugeman0 I agree with you that the titles would have looked better against a stationery background. I also agree with you that Dubois and B&W are better looking options when using 3D glasses.
ancientbricks 1 year ago
Awesome! I was thinking of doing this, but I didn't want to buy a separate camera, and anyways I thought of something even wilder, but it might not be coming out anyways :(.
I'm very good a cross-eyed, unlike everyone else I know, and I have red-cyan glasses. Anyways, I would be interested in your technique. Did you use two cameras? If so, I think it would be hard to find software, or if you moved the camera each frame, I think there would be camera shake. Also, there is a face on the left image
bugeman0 1 year ago
@bugeman0 I used 2 QCPro 9000 both ripped out of their cases. I flipped one upside down so I could get the lenses as close together as possible, and then built a LEGO case to enclose them together. A PC will only see one QC9000 at once, so I borrowed a 2nd computer from a friend for the right image, my own PC for the left image, and then for each frame, I had to remember to capture it on both PCs. But I just used all my typical software to pull it all together.
ancientbricks 1 year ago
lucky i have 3d glasses good job. some of it came out
legoreviewkid 1 year ago
Please don't release this in 3D this isn't so great for those of us that don't have 3D glasses.
snl3 1 year ago
@snl3 Why would I not release a 3D film in 3D after doing all that work to film it in 3D? You can view it in 3D using the cross-eyed technique without any 3D glasses (see film info section for help with this technique).
If that doesn't work for you, you can still watch the film in 2D, just select the "right image only " or "left image only" from the YouTube 3D player pop-up located right under the video to the right of 480p.
ancientbricks 1 year ago
are you still working on that last airbender tribiute?
legomaster1378 1 year ago
@legomaster1378 Now that I'm almost done with my BricksInMotion contest entry, I'll be able to get back to finishing up our little avatar tribute.
ancientbricks 1 year ago
great
legomaster1378 1 year ago
Epic.
lusasmproductions 1 year ago
Looks like it's going to be great. Unfortunately I don't have any 3D glasses on me.... : /
flooppy1 1 year ago
@flooppy1 No problem, learn cross-eyed viewing. See film info for details.
ancientbricks 1 year ago
@ancientbricks LOL!!! Do I have to watch it cross eyed. Haha!! Just kiding. Thank you. ; )
flooppy1 1 year ago
@flooppy1 Actually, yes, if you want to see it in 3D the cross-eyed technique requires you very slightly cross your eyes. Seriously. Imagine you were to focus on your finger that you hold up about 8 inches in front of your face. That's about how much you need to cross your eyes for this technique.
ancientbricks 1 year ago
@ancientbricks Hmm............. very very interesting, I will have to try that out. Is there a certain program you used to make it this way?
flooppy1 1 year ago
@flooppy1 Nope, just apps I already used. I used PaintShopPro to figure out exactly how I'd need to crop all the Left and Right images so that things would line up properly. I used Virtual Dub to actually do the cropping of all the images. I then used an old version of Premiere to shrink the Left video clips over to the right hand side and then to overlay and shrink the Right video clips to the left-hand side. By the end, I'd gotten the 3D process down to a science. :)
ancientbricks 1 year ago
@ancientbricks My my, it seems quite complicated if you ask me, Haha!!! But it seems like you know exactly what your doing. Unfortunately I couldn't get it to work on the cross-eyed 3D to work, for some reason I couldn't keep my eyes crossed. XD
flooppy1 1 year ago
@flooppy1 It does take a bit of practice. :)
ancientbricks 1 year ago
@ancientbricks Haha!!! Well I guess I will have to try it untill I get the hang of it. =)
flooppy1 1 year ago