@BAGboy0032 actually they were invented by the french in the 1500's because you only have one shot then you have to reload and that takes to long so you need a backup weapon.
@mexicanmadmonkey the time and place are correct, however in the documentary "history of the rifle" which i believe you may still find somewhere on this site, they said it was intended for dispatching game.
They outlawed "saturday night specials". Those were .25 cal cheap handguns. They were not capable of penetrating a cop's leather jacket at 50 feet. They were very hard to aim and hit a target past 25 feet.
Now, gangs carry .45 and 9mm handguns. Far more dangerous. Stupid anti-gun types.
Keeping guns for defense against an invasion or tyranical governent makes sense. Whether or not law abiding citizens have the right to keep powerful weapons is one thing, but I would hold their right not to get shot in higher esteem. Another legal issue is the objectives of self defense. There have been cases in Ireland where people killed others in self defense and all were indicted, those getting off proved an imediate threat to life (i.e) not leaving the property.
Most of these cases did not involve guns but knives or blunt instruments. One famous 2004 case led to a man getting 6 years for shooting an intruder. It was over turned on appeal. The laws were changed in 2009, removing the "need to retreat, yet still requiring the use of deadly force to be necessary and proportionate. Also the right of the intruder to claim for injuries sustained was diminished. So in Ireland it is advisable not to shoot the drunk guy on your lawn.
bit lame, its like saying i should be able to get heroin at a pharmacy just cause there is legal drugs that are just as bad. automatic and semi-automatic weapons are banned in Australia, but theyre still around, if ppl want weapons theyre gonna have weapons regardless of law. if u cant buy them ur gonna steal them. in Australia a few years ago an army barracks, i believe in Sydney, was missing a shitload of weapons from training rifles(.22 austeyr), assault rifles, grenade/anti-tank launchers..
Please a folding stock takes away the stock with can be used as a club. Pistol grips do nothing but make your rifle have a new shape. Bayonets are inpractical when anyone can hit a target from 200 meters away. Muzzel surpressors were designed to reduce recoil not the flash. No one uses WW2 rifles for anything but collecting and recreation. The standard magazines for AK47's and M16's are 30 rounds. Though the M16's original magazine held 20 the larger one was made standard during the Vietnam War.
It's not like any army would by seperated. Obviusly they would focus in big cities or important military points like ports and borders. They would also clear out areas around them. But true that US would have prety big undeground army.
@JbRezurectd Its not stupid its perfectly logical the constitution was written during a time where the atrocities of the British government were still fresh in there mind. The Brits were passing heavy taxes and sending all back to Britain making harsh living conditions. In order to stop us from rebelling they didnt allow guns searches seizures destroyed printing presses. They wrote all those things into the constitution to ensure our government acted on behalf of citizens and stop tyrants.
@Mikitsubizunizu Skinner would have stated that it is probably because of a traumatic experience which made them uneasy (eg getting owned after clicking the like button) or that they had a pleasurable experience when they clicked the unlike button
Fighting with NWO using guns is pointless. It's monster without gun. If police\US army comes to you door to arest you can kill 100 of them but still you can't stop NWO. Also about invading US. To use that 300 milion weapons US would had to lose the war. How do anyone image that US would allow to desant troops on thier land with Air superiority. Civilians do not have training and hardware to defend country doing war.
@Ormusn2o Not that it would happen but if a foreign army was on US soil they wouldn't be able to move. They would be under constant harassment fire. Sure civilians couldn't win an all out battle but there is no way a foreign military could stay. They would be slowly picked off 1 by 1.
@Ormusn2o "X.X cuz of people like you everyone thinks americans are stupid."
Because of dimwitted trash like you, American don't give a damn what foreign trash think.
By the way, maggot. I am one of those Americans with military experience. i also have experiience in law enforcement, prior to a long career as a software engineer. I am now retired and have time in the winter to kick ignorant asses like you.
all you fucking gun nuts keep talking about "defending our nation from tyrants" or "shooting the crazy guy with the gun before he shoots up the shopping mall" or whatever excuse you can muster without looking at the real issue! 1. your country is already run by tyrants - where's the revolution guys? 2. do you think the huge availability of guns has anything to do with the high proportion of gun massacres?
@Megalithomaniac 1) people are seriously considering it, especially if Obama is re-elected. 2) no, almost all massacres were committed using ILLEGAL firearms in GUN FREE zones.
youtube is made for videos, not powerpoint presentations. when will people get it? it sure is informative, but it's not a video. just when will people start posting real videos?
to every poster here believing that guns are evil, I thank you. I really do thank you. because I can buy a fairly cheap, non regulated rifle imported from our kind mexican friends (federal regulations don't apply, weapon's illegal to begin with). I can then break into your house, kill you, rape your daughter, steal whatever you own. And the best part is, I know you'll have no way to defend yourself. I bet you'll wish you had a gun of your own as I splatter your brains,
The only guns I will ever consider to be ASSAULT WEAPONS are the ones that cops carry due to their trigger happy fingers weather its their pistols or rifles, but my AK-47 is no assault rifle because I never have the intension to assault anyone with it I'm a god damn collector for fuck sake so leave me the hell alone.
I don't understand your video: Are you trying to advocate for a free access to an arsenal capable of killing a hundred of people before the police even arrive (for self-defense, of course, like in Oslo...) or are you trying to show how dangerous the legal weapons already are because they are just the same and those differences are just gadgets? BTW, if those are just gadgets of already very effective weapons, why did you feel the need to make this video? To diffend your family or your hobby?
1. if you read carefully what you've written in your video you will see that the limited magazine capacity was to prevent people from making a carnage. That the 5 most used weapons in crimes are all below 10 rounds has nothing to do with the fact that it's easier to make a carnage when you can fire 30 rounds without reloading.
2.that 2nd amendment came from the time that there was a frontier and not much government control
3. do you guys realy think 300 million weapons make your country safer???
@TheBackslash1 I don't know, ask them brits how confident they are of defending their houses and properties. meanwhile, here in montana, go ahead..make my day.
@TheBackslash1 would you invade a country that is protected with 300 million weapons?
even back in ww2, the main reason that the Japanese didn't invade mainland USA is because every man and his dog had a firearm and was willing to use it.
@LooksLegitBro that wasn't the question. sure, 300milion weapons are good for that but so is a big army (and believe me 664 billion dollars is waaaay too much)
the only real menace to the US stability and freedom is not in the Middle East nor Far East... it's right here, in the minds of these people who want to have weapons to face the US government... people who is accumulating weapons and training not for the eventuality of a foreign attack, but to confront a US government that doesn't represent their political interests Say no to domestic terrorism and domestic extremists!!
@NOTQUITETHEREGAMiiNG What in the world are you thinking? You could have done a simple google search and figured out that you are completely wrong! The rifles are developed on the base of the venerable Kalashnikov assault rifle and chambered for 7.62x39, . 223 Rem (5.56x45), and 5.45x39 cartridges. Additional buttstock available with adjustable cheek rest. That is straight off Sagia's website. The AK47 is chambered in 7.62 mainly not 5.56
a well regulated militia doesn't mean the fucking national guard or military. it means rebels and "minute men". the bill of rights is about protecting people from the government so why the fuck would they need to add an amendment that says teh u.s. can have a military. thats in the first and 2nd god damn articles.
tell me when the 2nd amendment was added did they think about sporting no they were thinking about protection the right to bear arms s there so that u can protect yourself from the government that was their true intention for self defense and gun laws are retarded these days
intresting video and well done. like the video states over and over again, the best way to combat the people who want to ban the use of firearms in the U.S. (though i dont think it is a major threat because of the constituion) is through education. if most of the populace isnt behind you, your opinions have no traction in washington D.C.
urban supposedly intellectual americans think that guns are dangerous. do you prefer to be living in a country like where i have been, where government even require you to have gun permit to buy non-firing replicas? guard your freedom and treasure it while you have them.
I think we should ban SCARY looking guns because they can murder my children in the middle of the night by themselves. As for the criminals that use them, we'll give them 2 years in jail and call it a day.
@UggmunsStudios Don't forget that in NY, a telescoping stock turns my AR into a HEAT SEEKING HELICOPTER DESTROYER that has a fail safe that if it misses the chopper to kill the nearest cop! Who knew a stock could be so bad right?
government=idiots. gun laws are written by people that have never had gun experiance. guns may be bad in their eyes, but NOT in the eyes of responsible average american gun owners. THE ASSAULT WEPONS BAN SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN!!!
Damn dude, this is very well done. As an NRA member, and gun owner, of the most-shown AR15, I salute you on this video. It is very comprehensive and loaded with good information. Now, go show this to some liberals.
I can't even join in the debate. I crapped my pants when I saw a picture of that flash suppressor I was so scared! Maybe we can just paint all guns pink? I don't know the answer but until I figure it out don't try to hurt me or any good people I know because I have a high capacity mag.
the statistics for gun violence in America are coming from the GIANT gang wars in NY and L.A and cities all around America they don't really apply to legal gun owners,of course we have a high rate of gun related crimes we have a full blown war going on in the streets guns are imported and sold illegally and used by the estimated 2 million gang members responsible for more then 80% of crimes in communities across the nation,CA and NY have the toughest gun laws and there the places with gun crime
@Apegutt11 You just made yourself look very, very stupid. Anti-gun piece of crap... People should be able to buy whatever they want with their own money. If you want to dress up your rifle with a bayonet, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO IT! And if you don't like it, just get the fuck out of America. Seriously dude, just get the fuck out.
@Whitekid762 see the problem with americans is they think they can do anything without concequences they just do what they want because they think they are allowed, there is no good reason to make a rifle a stabbing instrument you arent gonna be cutting cheese with it anytime soon.
fantastic! exactly the point i've had in my head for a few years now. in canada, our laws are very similar to those during the ban, but ours effect where, and how you own, carry/transport, and opperate your firearm. you can own an AK-variant, but it can only be used at a range if classed as a restricted firearm. but an SKS is perfectly ok to use anywhere you like. within reason of course. i own 2 AR-15's. i'm limited to 5rnd mags, and can only shoot at the range. but my SR-22 can go anywhere.
@WenchesOfRedemption totally agreeable, from how I see it people don't ask for bigger guns, people think a pistol is enough to defend a family, which I can see, but then again some people find it to be that they can purchase like an mp5 or other smg and still defend their family with more firepower, how I see it what you carry is the best, but most Americans carry small pistols like the ones shown in the video, and even revolvers, but from my point of view, carrying a larger weapon has a type o
If I am right, by U.S. law we cannot have a firearm that is automatic, all firearms that were automatic have to be decommissioned or something like that so they are only semi-auto. I do not care if it is auto or not, but in a lot of games I play where I can change the fire rate I usually set it you semi-auto if I can since it gives more accuracy and conserves bullets. What I do not understand is the reason why auto is so bad when semi-auto is just a different tactic basically.
@tbclycan no even during the ban you could get an ffl and get them they are really no far illegal also i find it funny you know where ppl say the government banned suppressors and fully auto weapons yet you can get a $200 dollar tax stamp for a suppressor and that makes the government happy
@stillbillstillbillst. Well I'm not surprised you're not in this country because you obviously haven't heard of Kennesaw, Georgia. A law was passed in the late 80s (not positive on the year) for every household to have at least one weapon with ammunition. This was done to deter crime. You'd think "more guns = more crime" right? Wrong - the crime rate dropped by about 85%. The reason is simple. Criminals don't follow laws. An armed citizen is a criminal's worst fear, not the authorities or laws.
@DaddyRTO - "If the government becomes rogue" - Sorry dude. 2 late for that. The government IS already as rogue as rogue gets. It has been for decades now, corporations run this place and we live in a police state, and martial law is only a few years away. BUY AMMO and LOTS of it.
i get that in america today the country is saturated with guns so criminals would have guns and public wouldent, but its because it started out legal and then grew to the point where we have enough nukes in the world to coat the surface in lethal radiation may times over. a pistol is enough to defend yourself and family, because people keep demanding bigger guns because they are constantly being developed needs to stop or we are gna keep spiraling down a self desctrutive path.
"a pistol is enough to defend yourself and family, because people keep demanding bigger guns because they are constantly being developed needs to stop or we are gna keep spiraling down a self desctrutive path"
First of all, people keep demanding bigger guns because the government keeps demanding bigger guns too.
Secondly, my Ar-15, semi auto MP5, and my Saiga 12 shotgun loaded with a 20 shell drum magazine are enough to defend my family and my country from a tyrant.
my dog is potentially dangerous. he has claws and teeth, and he's strong. If he wanted to harm me, he could. But he sleeps in my bed. He eats the scraps from my table. He protects my family for me when I am away. He would give his last breath to protect any member of this family.
dissenters of 2A rights- you are our family. we are your sheepdogs. yes we have guns, but we love you and we will protect you with our dying breath if we have to. we need these sharp teeth to protect you from wolves.
You know, Fritz, while you guys do make some pretty snazzy cars, the main reason you are able to speak your mind freely at all is because at one point in time, a bunch of Americans that liked to talk about guns liberated you from a bunch of fascist socialist scumbags. Immediately after that, a bunch of other Americans who were also mostly fond of firearms were stationed in your land of fine beer and sausage to keep you from being steamrolled by a bunch of communists.
@WenchesOfRedemption and now the americans are the overpowering thinking there better than every one else scumbags...... things really do come full circle.
Uhm… I may have to diagram that sentence, and then get back to you. =)
One can only hope that your level of reasoning doesn't rival your grasp of the English language. Then again, you are the hoplophobic buffoon who seeks out gun videos.
Uhm… I may have to diagram that sentence, and then get back to you. =)
One can only hope that your level of reasoning doesn't rival your grasp of the English language. Then again, you are the hoplophobic buffoon who seeks out gun videos.
@WenchesOfRedemption Pretty sure the poms had a fair bit to do with knocking Hitler down too. In fact most of the intelligence the U.S used during the cold war came from the English, it was an intelligence war wasn't it?
The point I was trying to make in my comment was that people in Europe have a lot to thank us for, instead of bashing our country and the second amendment. If it weren't for our country, the Russians wouldn't have lasted long due to the fact Hitler was fighting a two front war. He had a fair amount of troops ready for D-Day and the allies in Europe.
Stillbillstillst is anti-gun, anti-self defense, and anti-American. He doesn't deserve my respect.
@WenchesOfRedemption And the point I was trying to make is that rather than give credit where it is due, to win an argument that only the right wing extreme want to argue. You claim America's imaginary need to defend themselves from the "British" attacking again, is what is single handedly saving the world. How about the British helping you Americans out in the Pacific. I mean Jesus Christ it was a world war and you guy's trooped in late.
First of all, I am a conservative who loves our country and constitution, not a "right-wing extremist."
Second of all, yes it was a world war and we did receive help during the European and Pacific theater.
Third, do not think I hate Europeans. I love them. But the ones who I do not like are the people who insult our nation, refer to us as gun-nut hillbillies, say we need better health care, more government control, high taxes, etc etc.
@speebyda "How about the British helping you Americans out in the Pacific. I mean Jesus Christ it was a world war and you guy's trooped in late." The British did help a LITTLE bit. Not nearly as much as we helped the British. If it wasn't for the US the British would be still be under German control. As for us coming in late we didn't have a real reason to in till the attacks on Pearl Harbor. Peace commerce and honest friendship with all nations entangling alliances with none-Thomas Jefferson
but hey see through the "propaganda" and see the truth! that is that you wanna shoot a bigger gun so you feel a bit more powerful meanwhile schoolkids borrow daddys gun and teach the half the school a lesson. also guns have been developed a freaking lot since sinse the declareation of independence when guns could shoot like 5 bullets a minute now its more like a thousand, pistol is for defence.. sport takes skill nothing about a thousand bullets a minute takes skill. its unnescesary.
@stillbillstillbillst the only guns that are actually capable of firing "a thousand rounds a minute" are guns such as the minigun which are electrically operated multibarrel weapons. So if you see a guy with a huge battery pack on his back and a weapon that weighs more than he does with 5 barrels coming out of it maybe you should leave the area. Otherwise be worried about the guy with the pistol that can deliver one round, accurately, to your head.
@jmcclelland2007 M4A1 Rate of fire: 700 - 950 rounds per minute- Source worldguns.ru I assume thats without reloading so it couldent actually fire that amount. But it does has the capacity to rapidly empty a clip of high calibre bullets. What about this gun and all others should be legalised letting anyone with a driving licence and a internet connection gain not only a VERY efficient killing tool but the information to use it effectively. just because you shoot cans that does not make it a toy.
@stillbillstillbillst first of all do some research on the weapon after around 200 repetitive rounds the barrel heats so much it starts to warp. second go fire a weapon lets say a semi-auto .22 with a 20 round magazine aim at a target about 30-50yds away aim the sights dead center at the target and fire all 20 rounds as quick as you can. count hw many actually hit. very few hand held weapons are designed to shoot accurately at anywhere near those speeds that simply means the action is that fast.
@stillbillstillbillst Also, assault rifles (civilian) aren't automatic. They fire one round at a time. And I know of no assault rifle that fires a thousand rounds a minute. That would have been nice to have WHEN I WAS IN IRAQ! You obviously don't know anything about guns or about our country. The Founders weren't worried about shooting sprees. They were worried about what you're proposing. The government taking from the people.
the creater of this cares nothing about the impact that legalising such a lethal gun could have on crime in america, homfri says we are gonna find another way to kill eachother, sure.. but nothing quite as effective as 1 crazy dude with ten magazines and a assult rifle, your talking triple death figues all across the country. suddenly their legal everyone can get them death rate for gun crimes skyrockets... women and children dead because you wanted a bigger gun to shoot either cans or animals.
Well put togeather vid that makes a very good point. My right to own firearms is being infringed upon and i don't like it! All lawmakers (senators, congressmen, ect...) should be required to watch this vid. Laws should exist ''for the people'' not ''against the people''. Having different stocks, mags, grips, ect... don't make the firearms more (or less) dangerous. Just ask someone who has been shot a killed by one if he cares wether he cares if it had a pistol grip on it or not! IMHO
@stillbillstillbillst yeah but what im saying is THEY will have the assualt rifels and a pistol wont be a good defence who do you think would win a guy with a ak-47 or a colt 1911
@stillbillstillbillst IM JUST SAYING THAT WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT SO WE CAN HAVE GUNS (EXCEPT FOR HEAVY MACHINEGUNS) WHAT ARE YOU SOME KIND OF HIPPIE!
@supermanben123 if you read my comment i said the second ammendment was written when guns could fire maybe 4 shots a min now its like a thousand thats a fuck tonne more dangerous and the second ammendment is quite frankly out the fuck dated. your just using the second ammendment as a shield to shrug off the impact legal firearms has on society. i come from england and without even researching it i can garenteee we have less % of gun crimes because they are illegle + no accidentental discharges.
@stillbillstillbillst If the second amendment doesn't cover modern firearms, then does the first amendment cover words that were not used during the time it was written? Does the fourth amendment not cover your cars or your computers, because those sure as hell weren't around then. Does the eighth amendment allow people to be tortured with electricity because man wasn't able to harness the power of it back when the bill of rights was written? keep to your own country and let us worry about ours.
@jcroccoCT Keep to your own country and let us worry about ours HA!, thats the most hypocritical statement ever. Americans keeping to themselves, dont be retarded. at least realise what kinda country you live in. litrally one guy just rephrased the second ammendment and thought he was entitled to a assault rifle.I dident really wanna address the ammendments. Dont have a problem with any of them aside from the second as it is allowing people to gain access to killing tools, Regardless of how used
The 2nd Amendment isn't for hunting ducks, or even self defense.
It is for preventing an American Stalin, or Hitler.
'The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.' - Thomas Jefferson
@TheBoberton But the Home Office has hit back at the statistics, claiming that the average American is seven times more likely to be murdered than their British counterpart and 60 times more likely to be shot. -BBC news
@stillbillstillbillst maybe less gun crime but much more knife crime in europe. Remember if you take away my gun I'll kill you with a stick. As far as "accidental discharges" if you are reffering to kids getting thier parents weapons, thats a parenting issue not a gun control one.
@stillbillstillbillst haha a gun isnt a toy, I agree but its still fun to go out and shoot whether it be a toy or not
Just like how my truck on the road can be very deadly if not driven carefully, but I still like to let loose off-road driving fast and wild and be safe
Just like how I can go to a range or a nice peice of land and let loose with firearms but be much more carful with a firearm when walking the streets
Also theres a much higher chance of me accidently rolling my vehicle or hitting a tree then there is of me having an accidental discharge or accidental shooting
I say therefore I say we ban all atv's, dirtbikes, and trucks, I mean who needs them there dangerous and who needs them, where so progressive nobody needs a truck or atv for work anymore
@supermanben123 You can have heavy machine guns. You just have to pay the $200 dollar tax, file a shit ton of paperwork and then fork out 20,000 - $shitload.00. lol.
@stillbillstillbillst yeah but what im saying is THEY will have the assualt rifels and a pistol wont be a good defence who do you think would win a guy with a ak-47 or a colt 1911 moron
@jaxfromcanada the context of the constitution has not changed only the way at which we speak you are clearly the retard if you are to narrow minded to realize this
@insanezy no it has the constitution was written when the u.s was only 13 small states and not the massive country it is today. when the constitution was written there was threat form attacks from britan through canada and spain from mexico and cuba so the protection of civilians was needed due to the relitivly small army they were left with now the united states mexico and canada are on good terms as are the u.s an britan militia is no longer a valit term due to the creation of reseve forces
@jaxfromcanada #2 that dowhat militias used to do but are trained using weapons and other equipment that are useful to the new tasks found on the modern battle feild.... let me put it in a simple way. if another suicide attack comes what are you going to do shoot at the plane with an M16?
@jaxfromcanada the need for an armed militia is to fend off an oppressive government the fact that the us is now bigger changes nothing we may not be under threat from britan or wherever the hell else but at some point in time we are going to have to fend for ourselves against our own government thats what he second amendment was created for so the people can at least try and defend themselves
@jaxfromcanada And who do you think is going to force out the old government and put a new one in??? the militia made by the people. the army's will do what they are told by the government that includes the people who are trying to overthrow an oppressive government and the allies are allies to the government not the people they wouldnt be any help either
@jaxfromcanada It doesn't matter what the "context of time" was when it was written. That was the point. What posed a threat to Liberty then still does today. Our Constitution was written to remain a foundation for our country. If the foundation is constantly changing, how can a building stand?
@DaddyRTO the entire idea of the armed miliia i understand. but with the entire idea is old and it needs to be at least re worked i guess my real issue is that people have like stockpiles of weapons in their basements and the constitution needs to make at least limiting weapons and controll of these weapons so that he american people can be safer.......
Ah, but the Constitution does not say 'The right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, except for this gun because it's scary-looking.'
The Second Amendment is there to allow the American people to prevent the government (Or that of another nation) taking over.
@DaddyRTO part 2 sry if that dosent make sence like i get where everyone else is coming from just think that even if these weapons were used against a rogue government they need to be beter regulated than they are now.
@jaxfromcanada If the government becomes rogue, how will regulating weapons help? If the government regulates them and then decides to usurp its power (go rogue) it will just take the guns away. Any power we give to the government is a right that we lose.
@jaxfromcanada How would the "American people be safer" if they do not have access to the tools to defend themselves? And how does a stockpile of firearms cause an immediate danger? I have never seen nor heard a gun commit an evil or malicious act, without an evil or malicious person behind it.
@mauiboy are you serious? Do you think criminals buy guns from places that sell them legally? Then how do they get fully automatic weapons? Cause believe me they have them. You need to stop listening to the news and every other retarded democrat that thinks they know what's right for me own.
great video. and funny thing is, bayonets were originally invented for hunting, not warfare.
BAGboy0032 1 month ago
@BAGboy0032 actually they were invented by the french in the 1500's because you only have one shot then you have to reload and that takes to long so you need a backup weapon.
mexicanmadmonkey 1 month ago
@mexicanmadmonkey the time and place are correct, however in the documentary "history of the rifle" which i believe you may still find somewhere on this site, they said it was intended for dispatching game.
BAGboy0032 1 month ago
@BAGboy0032 thank you! i did not know that.
mexicanmadmonkey 1 month ago
They outlawed "saturday night specials". Those were .25 cal cheap handguns. They were not capable of penetrating a cop's leather jacket at 50 feet. They were very hard to aim and hit a target past 25 feet.
Now, gangs carry .45 and 9mm handguns. Far more dangerous. Stupid anti-gun types.
HateGovernment 2 months ago
Comment removed
Paxification 2 months ago
Keeping guns for defense against an invasion or tyranical governent makes sense. Whether or not law abiding citizens have the right to keep powerful weapons is one thing, but I would hold their right not to get shot in higher esteem. Another legal issue is the objectives of self defense. There have been cases in Ireland where people killed others in self defense and all were indicted, those getting off proved an imediate threat to life (i.e) not leaving the property.
Paxification 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Most of these cases did not involve guns but knives or blunt instruments. One famous 2004 case led to a man getting 6 years for shooting an intruder. It was over turned on appeal. The laws were changed in 2009, removing the "need to retreat, yet still requiring the use of deadly force to be necessary and proportionate. Also the right of the intruder to claim for injuries sustained was diminished. So in Ireland it is advisable not to shoot the drunk guy on your lawn.
Paxification 2 weeks ago
bit lame, its like saying i should be able to get heroin at a pharmacy just cause there is legal drugs that are just as bad. automatic and semi-automatic weapons are banned in Australia, but theyre still around, if ppl want weapons theyre gonna have weapons regardless of law. if u cant buy them ur gonna steal them. in Australia a few years ago an army barracks, i believe in Sydney, was missing a shitload of weapons from training rifles(.22 austeyr), assault rifles, grenade/anti-tank launchers..
AussieSoldier1984 2 months ago
Please a folding stock takes away the stock with can be used as a club. Pistol grips do nothing but make your rifle have a new shape. Bayonets are inpractical when anyone can hit a target from 200 meters away. Muzzel surpressors were designed to reduce recoil not the flash. No one uses WW2 rifles for anything but collecting and recreation. The standard magazines for AK47's and M16's are 30 rounds. Though the M16's original magazine held 20 the larger one was made standard during the Vietnam War.
drnogood59 2 months ago
Well done
irishgreen343 2 months ago
Thank you nice presentation.
calrenman 3 months ago
first comment in 3 weeks?! i fell so fulfilled
Makzimiser 3 months ago
Wolling20's spelling skills really add to his credibility.
springle82 4 months ago
It's not like any army would by seperated. Obviusly they would focus in big cities or important military points like ports and borders. They would also clear out areas around them. But true that US would have prety big undeground army.
Ormusn2o 5 months ago
You sir, deserve a cookie...
halolover2dmax 5 months ago
lol...just sounds like americans compalaining about not being able to have guns...fucking stupid
JbRezurectd 5 months ago
@JbRezurectd It's more about stupid laws that serve no purpose.
shananagans5 5 months ago 4
@JbRezurectd Its not stupid its perfectly logical the constitution was written during a time where the atrocities of the British government were still fresh in there mind. The Brits were passing heavy taxes and sending all back to Britain making harsh living conditions. In order to stop us from rebelling they didnt allow guns searches seizures destroyed printing presses. They wrote all those things into the constitution to ensure our government acted on behalf of citizens and stop tyrants.
trilintia 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JbRezurectd "lol...just sounds like americans compalaining about not being able to have guns...fucking stupid"
Sounds just like a limp-wristed limey whining again.
XNMR53 2 weeks ago
and thats an airsoft magazine
williamjpiano 5 months ago
AND, the government likes to blind us shooters
williamjpiano 5 months ago
firing from the hip is easier without a pistol grip due to the shape of our hands
williamjpiano 5 months ago
Freud would think these 42 people were sexually repressed.
Mikitsubizunizu 5 months ago
@Mikitsubizunizu Skinner would have stated that it is probably because of a traumatic experience which made them uneasy (eg getting owned after clicking the like button) or that they had a pleasurable experience when they clicked the unlike button
williamjpiano 5 months ago
Fighting with NWO using guns is pointless. It's monster without gun. If police\US army comes to you door to arest you can kill 100 of them but still you can't stop NWO. Also about invading US. To use that 300 milion weapons US would had to lose the war. How do anyone image that US would allow to desant troops on thier land with Air superiority. Civilians do not have training and hardware to defend country doing war.
Ormusn2o 6 months ago
@Ormusn2o Not that it would happen but if a foreign army was on US soil they wouldn't be able to move. They would be under constant harassment fire. Sure civilians couldn't win an all out battle but there is no way a foreign military could stay. They would be slowly picked off 1 by 1.
shananagans5 5 months ago 4
@Ormusn2o "Civilians do not have training and hardware to defend country doing war."
Evidently the moronic eurotrash has no idea of how many amrican citizens have military experience.
XNMR53 2 weeks ago
@XNMR53 X.X cuz of people like you everyone thinks americans are stupid.
Ormusn2o 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ormusn2o "X.X cuz of people like you everyone thinks americans are stupid."
Because of dimwitted trash like you, American don't give a damn what foreign trash think.
By the way, maggot. I am one of those Americans with military experience. i also have experiience in law enforcement, prior to a long career as a software engineer. I am now retired and have time in the winter to kick ignorant asses like you.
How is pushing that broom working out for you?
XNMR53 2 weeks ago
all you fucking gun nuts keep talking about "defending our nation from tyrants" or "shooting the crazy guy with the gun before he shoots up the shopping mall" or whatever excuse you can muster without looking at the real issue! 1. your country is already run by tyrants - where's the revolution guys? 2. do you think the huge availability of guns has anything to do with the high proportion of gun massacres?
Megalithomaniac 6 months ago
@Megalithomaniac 1) people are seriously considering it, especially if Obama is re-elected. 2) no, almost all massacres were committed using ILLEGAL firearms in GUN FREE zones.
polske322 6 months ago
@Megalithomaniac Hey, Look up Nazi Germany or Stalins U.S.S.R.
Un-armed people vs. Tyrants. I wonder who won... combined death total over 60 million to 100 million... priceless.
calrenman 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Megalithomaniac "all you fucking gun nuts keep talking about "defending our nation from tyrants" "
All you loudmouthed eurotrash keep sticking your nose into affairs that don't concern you. All I hear is the whining of a pack of losers.
XNMR53 2 weeks ago
youtube is made for videos, not powerpoint presentations. when will people get it? it sure is informative, but it's not a video. just when will people start posting real videos?
mardamek1 6 months ago
whats with all this scary nonsense? its all bad ass
sojuwannadrink1 6 months ago
to every poster here believing that guns are evil, I thank you. I really do thank you. because I can buy a fairly cheap, non regulated rifle imported from our kind mexican friends (federal regulations don't apply, weapon's illegal to begin with). I can then break into your house, kill you, rape your daughter, steal whatever you own. And the best part is, I know you'll have no way to defend yourself. I bet you'll wish you had a gun of your own as I splatter your brains,
touge242 6 months ago
The only guns I will ever consider to be ASSAULT WEAPONS are the ones that cops carry due to their trigger happy fingers weather its their pistols or rifles, but my AK-47 is no assault rifle because I never have the intension to assault anyone with it I'm a god damn collector for fuck sake so leave me the hell alone.
TheCaferocker 7 months ago
I don't understand your video: Are you trying to advocate for a free access to an arsenal capable of killing a hundred of people before the police even arrive (for self-defense, of course, like in Oslo...) or are you trying to show how dangerous the legal weapons already are because they are just the same and those differences are just gadgets? BTW, if those are just gadgets of already very effective weapons, why did you feel the need to make this video? To diffend your family or your hobby?
wollin20 7 months ago
1. if you read carefully what you've written in your video you will see that the limited magazine capacity was to prevent people from making a carnage. That the 5 most used weapons in crimes are all below 10 rounds has nothing to do with the fact that it's easier to make a carnage when you can fire 30 rounds without reloading.
2.that 2nd amendment came from the time that there was a frontier and not much government control
3. do you guys realy think 300 million weapons make your country safer???
TheBackslash1 7 months ago
@TheBackslash1 I don't know, ask them brits how confident they are of defending their houses and properties. meanwhile, here in montana, go ahead..make my day.
touge242 6 months ago
@TheBackslash1 would you invade a country that is protected with 300 million weapons?
even back in ww2, the main reason that the Japanese didn't invade mainland USA is because every man and his dog had a firearm and was willing to use it.
LooksLegitBro 6 months ago
@LooksLegitBro that wasn't the question. sure, 300milion weapons are good for that but so is a big army (and believe me 664 billion dollars is waaaay too much)
TheBackslash1 6 months ago
the only real menace to the US stability and freedom is not in the Middle East nor Far East... it's right here, in the minds of these people who want to have weapons to face the US government... people who is accumulating weapons and training not for the eventuality of a foreign attack, but to confront a US government that doesn't represent their political interests Say no to domestic terrorism and domestic extremists!!
josuegtz 7 months ago
so where can i get a muzzle brake that will make sir the bad guy cant see me at night???
50TNCSA 8 months ago
the sagia and ak47 are not the same similair recivers however the ak47 is a 5.56mm rifle the sagia is a shotgun or slug firing gun stupid video
NOTQUITETHEREGAMiiNG 8 months ago
@NOTQUITETHEREGAMiiNG What in the world are you thinking? You could have done a simple google search and figured out that you are completely wrong! The rifles are developed on the base of the venerable Kalashnikov assault rifle and chambered for 7.62x39, . 223 Rem (5.56x45), and 5.45x39 cartridges. Additional buttstock available with adjustable cheek rest. That is straight off Sagia's website. The AK47 is chambered in 7.62 mainly not 5.56
natebrod 8 months ago in playlist Gun Control in the United States
@natebrod The AK 47 is 7.65 the AK 101 is 5.56. I don't know if any other flavors of AK are chambered for the 5.56
purplemutantas 7 months ago
@purplemutantas 47 is 7.62
74 is 5.45 which is similar as you can tell
my saiga ak variant is chambered for .223
shotgunn9 7 months ago
a well regulated militia doesn't mean the fucking national guard or military. it means rebels and "minute men". the bill of rights is about protecting people from the government so why the fuck would they need to add an amendment that says teh u.s. can have a military. thats in the first and 2nd god damn articles.
26FanMusic 8 months ago 2
dianne feinstein is a bitch
MaximGhost 8 months ago
its nice to know there aere people who cares about our rights
kolinmartz 8 months ago
37 people are pro gun laws theyll see what happent to those who dont like guns
kolinmartz 8 months ago
tell me when the 2nd amendment was added did they think about sporting no they were thinking about protection the right to bear arms s there so that u can protect yourself from the government that was their true intention for self defense and gun laws are retarded these days
kolinmartz 8 months ago
only one which was actually proven make any difference at all was foldind stock.
Colenelnelson 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The song is from the movie Max Payne. The original song though is "Marilyn Manson - If I Was Your Vampire".
THUMB UP ON THIS FOR PPL
cv0lv0g0 8 months ago
intresting video and well done. like the video states over and over again, the best way to combat the people who want to ban the use of firearms in the U.S. (though i dont think it is a major threat because of the constituion) is through education. if most of the populace isnt behind you, your opinions have no traction in washington D.C.
dylaninLG 8 months ago
urban supposedly intellectual americans think that guns are dangerous. do you prefer to be living in a country like where i have been, where government even require you to have gun permit to buy non-firing replicas? guard your freedom and treasure it while you have them.
muhyiting 9 months ago
I think we should ban SCARY looking guns because they can murder my children in the middle of the night by themselves. As for the criminals that use them, we'll give them 2 years in jail and call it a day.
UggmunsStudios 9 months ago
@UggmunsStudios Don't forget that in NY, a telescoping stock turns my AR into a HEAT SEEKING HELICOPTER DESTROYER that has a fail safe that if it misses the chopper to kill the nearest cop! Who knew a stock could be so bad right?
Speedogg138 8 months ago
as a race it seems guns are necescary
stillbillstillbillst 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst
As for someone who believes in self defense, I guess you're right!
WenchesOfRedemption 8 months ago
US weaponizing everyone and hunt them as a threat!!!
JineshJK 9 months ago
government=idiots. gun laws are written by people that have never had gun experiance. guns may be bad in their eyes, but NOT in the eyes of responsible average american gun owners. THE ASSAULT WEPONS BAN SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN!!!
tennessee226 9 months ago
Damn dude, this is very well done. As an NRA member, and gun owner, of the most-shown AR15, I salute you on this video. It is very comprehensive and loaded with good information. Now, go show this to some liberals.
bigapple0828 9 months ago
Where The HELL Would one get a Grenade Launcher in America?
BOBSAGATification 9 months ago
@BOBSAGATification AutoWeapons. com Go to destructive devices.
WenchesOfRedemption 9 months ago
tell me the name of the song
toyotasupra61 9 months ago
can you tell me the name of the song please ?
toyotasupra61 9 months ago
@toyotasupra61 Marilyn Manson - If I was your vampire.
got2xlr8 9 months ago
Hmm this video makes you think.
YoungBlackStud95 10 months ago
Dude. Whats the name of the music playing??
ALomovica 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ALomovica dude i found it :) Marilyn Manson - If I Was Your Vampire that is the song :)
toyotasupra61 9 months ago
@ALomovica Marilyn Manson - If I was your vampire.
got2xlr8 9 months ago
I can't even join in the debate. I crapped my pants when I saw a picture of that flash suppressor I was so scared! Maybe we can just paint all guns pink? I don't know the answer but until I figure it out don't try to hurt me or any good people I know because I have a high capacity mag.
1s1t1e1v1e1 10 months ago
the statistics for gun violence in America are coming from the GIANT gang wars in NY and L.A and cities all around America they don't really apply to legal gun owners,of course we have a high rate of gun related crimes we have a full blown war going on in the streets guns are imported and sold illegally and used by the estimated 2 million gang members responsible for more then 80% of crimes in communities across the nation,CA and NY have the toughest gun laws and there the places with gun crime
randomnoone 10 months ago
most criminals use ilegal weapons, even automatic one's, so the ban was bullshit
dfrss 10 months ago
hahaha this is the most stupid video i have ever seen! what are you going to use a bayonett for anyways? "ehhh...hunting"
Apegutt11 10 months ago
@Apegutt11 You just made yourself look very, very stupid. Anti-gun piece of crap... People should be able to buy whatever they want with their own money. If you want to dress up your rifle with a bayonet, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO IT! And if you don't like it, just get the fuck out of America. Seriously dude, just get the fuck out.
Whitekid762 10 months ago
@Whitekid762 see the problem with americans is they think they can do anything without concequences they just do what they want because they think they are allowed, there is no good reason to make a rifle a stabbing instrument you arent gonna be cutting cheese with it anytime soon.
stillbillstillbillst 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst hey "stabbing instruments" have been on a lot of firearms even before there were colonies do some research.
cv0lv0g0 8 months ago
fantastic! exactly the point i've had in my head for a few years now. in canada, our laws are very similar to those during the ban, but ours effect where, and how you own, carry/transport, and opperate your firearm. you can own an AK-variant, but it can only be used at a range if classed as a restricted firearm. but an SKS is perfectly ok to use anywhere you like. within reason of course. i own 2 AR-15's. i'm limited to 5rnd mags, and can only shoot at the range. but my SR-22 can go anywhere.
bigkid198 10 months ago
What is the song in the background?
jn102155 10 months ago
The 2nd amendment was put there in case thay start ignoring the others
Stiggian 10 months ago
BLA BLA BLA BLA.VIDEO
photogramistic 10 months ago
@WenchesOfRedemption totally agreeable, from how I see it people don't ask for bigger guns, people think a pistol is enough to defend a family, which I can see, but then again some people find it to be that they can purchase like an mp5 or other smg and still defend their family with more firepower, how I see it what you carry is the best, but most Americans carry small pistols like the ones shown in the video, and even revolvers, but from my point of view, carrying a larger weapon has a type o
YourAirsoftNightmare 10 months ago
If I am right, by U.S. law we cannot have a firearm that is automatic, all firearms that were automatic have to be decommissioned or something like that so they are only semi-auto. I do not care if it is auto or not, but in a lot of games I play where I can change the fire rate I usually set it you semi-auto if I can since it gives more accuracy and conserves bullets. What I do not understand is the reason why auto is so bad when semi-auto is just a different tactic basically.
tbclycan 10 months ago
@tbclycan no even during the ban you could get an ffl and get them they are really no far illegal also i find it funny you know where ppl say the government banned suppressors and fully auto weapons yet you can get a $200 dollar tax stamp for a suppressor and that makes the government happy
cv0lv0g0 8 months ago
2nd Amendmant isnt just for hunting
are forefathers GAVE us guns for our defense and sport
so what they say im so evil because i own a gun
everyone who founded this country owned a gun
and the police force isnt as effecient as liberals say it is
in fact basic response tim takes 30 minutes
beserkerpatroit1337 10 months ago
@beserkerpatroit1337 so lets pop a gun in everyones hand and see what happens
stillbillstillbillst 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst. Well I'm not surprised you're not in this country because you obviously haven't heard of Kennesaw, Georgia. A law was passed in the late 80s (not positive on the year) for every household to have at least one weapon with ammunition. This was done to deter crime. You'd think "more guns = more crime" right? Wrong - the crime rate dropped by about 85%. The reason is simple. Criminals don't follow laws. An armed citizen is a criminal's worst fear, not the authorities or laws.
bigapple0828 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst well i was origanally going to rant alot but these guys already owned so i dont need to speak my gathered info
beserkerpatroit1337 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst i kinda like that idea you know that had successful outcome when we did that in the revolutionary war
people can handle themselves with firearms i hate it when people treat grown human beings like toddlers
i hope you realize that its not that hard to learn firearms training
with all the new laws in germany its as if hitlers back under a new name
beserkerpatroit1337 8 months ago
M4 just sucks. end of story
saxokobe 11 months ago
@DaddyRTO - "If the government becomes rogue" - Sorry dude. 2 late for that. The government IS already as rogue as rogue gets. It has been for decades now, corporations run this place and we live in a police state, and martial law is only a few years away. BUY AMMO and LOTS of it.
hangman06 11 months ago
i get that in america today the country is saturated with guns so criminals would have guns and public wouldent, but its because it started out legal and then grew to the point where we have enough nukes in the world to coat the surface in lethal radiation may times over. a pistol is enough to defend yourself and family, because people keep demanding bigger guns because they are constantly being developed needs to stop or we are gna keep spiraling down a self desctrutive path.
stillbillstillbillst 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst
"a pistol is enough to defend yourself and family, because people keep demanding bigger guns because they are constantly being developed needs to stop or we are gna keep spiraling down a self desctrutive path"
First of all, people keep demanding bigger guns because the government keeps demanding bigger guns too.
Secondly, my Ar-15, semi auto MP5, and my Saiga 12 shotgun loaded with a 20 shell drum magazine are enough to defend my family and my country from a tyrant.
WenchesOfRedemption 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Assault is a behavior, not a device.
savage495 11 months ago
my dog is potentially dangerous. he has claws and teeth, and he's strong. If he wanted to harm me, he could. But he sleeps in my bed. He eats the scraps from my table. He protects my family for me when I am away. He would give his last breath to protect any member of this family.
dissenters of 2A rights- you are our family. we are your sheepdogs. yes we have guns, but we love you and we will protect you with our dying breath if we have to. we need these sharp teeth to protect you from wolves.
millersayshi 11 months ago 15
@stillbillstillbillst
You know, Fritz, while you guys do make some pretty snazzy cars, the main reason you are able to speak your mind freely at all is because at one point in time, a bunch of Americans that liked to talk about guns liberated you from a bunch of fascist socialist scumbags. Immediately after that, a bunch of other Americans who were also mostly fond of firearms were stationed in your land of fine beer and sausage to keep you from being steamrolled by a bunch of communists.
WenchesOfRedemption 11 months ago 29
@WenchesOfRedemption and now the americans are the overpowering thinking there better than every one else scumbags...... things really do come full circle.
jaxfromcanada 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaxfromcanada
Uhm… I may have to diagram that sentence, and then get back to you. =)
One can only hope that your level of reasoning doesn't rival your grasp of the English language. Then again, you are the hoplophobic buffoon who seeks out gun videos.
Nice fail!
WenchesOfRedemption 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaxfromcanada
Uhm… I may have to diagram that sentence, and then get back to you. =)
One can only hope that your level of reasoning doesn't rival your grasp of the English language. Then again, you are the hoplophobic buffoon who seeks out gun videos.
Nice fail!
WenchesOfRedemption 11 months ago
@WenchesOfRedemption all i saw was americans waiting til enough people died to have a advantage, swoop in and say america fuk yeah.
stillbillstillbillst 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst
All I saw was an ignorant, elitist Euro, who belongs in the local Asylum, commenting on YouTube and making a total ass of itself.
There's a place for you comrade. It's called Mexico. Have fun!
WenchesOfRedemption 9 months ago
@WenchesOfRedemption I fucking love you
aProudNRAMember 9 months ago
@aProudNRAMember
Thanks man! Subscribed!
WenchesOfRedemption 9 months ago
@WenchesOfRedemption No prob lol
aProudNRAMember 9 months ago
@WenchesOfRedemption Pretty sure the poms had a fair bit to do with knocking Hitler down too. In fact most of the intelligence the U.S used during the cold war came from the English, it was an intelligence war wasn't it?
speebyda 8 months ago
@speebyda
The point I was trying to make in my comment was that people in Europe have a lot to thank us for, instead of bashing our country and the second amendment. If it weren't for our country, the Russians wouldn't have lasted long due to the fact Hitler was fighting a two front war. He had a fair amount of troops ready for D-Day and the allies in Europe.
Stillbillstillst is anti-gun, anti-self defense, and anti-American. He doesn't deserve my respect.
WenchesOfRedemption 8 months ago
@WenchesOfRedemption And the point I was trying to make is that rather than give credit where it is due, to win an argument that only the right wing extreme want to argue. You claim America's imaginary need to defend themselves from the "British" attacking again, is what is single handedly saving the world. How about the British helping you Americans out in the Pacific. I mean Jesus Christ it was a world war and you guy's trooped in late.
speebyda 8 months ago
@speebyda
First of all, I am a conservative who loves our country and constitution, not a "right-wing extremist."
Second of all, yes it was a world war and we did receive help during the European and Pacific theater.
Third, do not think I hate Europeans. I love them. But the ones who I do not like are the people who insult our nation, refer to us as gun-nut hillbillies, say we need better health care, more government control, high taxes, etc etc.
WenchesOfRedemption 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@speebyda "How about the British helping you Americans out in the Pacific. I mean Jesus Christ it was a world war and you guy's trooped in late." The British did help a LITTLE bit. Not nearly as much as we helped the British. If it wasn't for the US the British would be still be under German control. As for us coming in late we didn't have a real reason to in till the attacks on Pearl Harbor. Peace commerce and honest friendship with all nations entangling alliances with none-Thomas Jefferson
whothaplaya 7 months ago
Guns dont walk around and shoot people people do
supermanben123 11 months ago
LOL'd at the bayonetting.
FUdirtbag 11 months ago
my AR has never shot at anyone, but it has been known to kill a few paper targets on the weekends:) scary huh?
20eXtreme00 11 months ago
BEWARE the folding stock on 2012!!!!!!!
bazookajoethethird 11 months ago
wat is ven scarier is my mom out da shower o=
ThatGuyOnTV564 1 year ago
but hey see through the "propaganda" and see the truth! that is that you wanna shoot a bigger gun so you feel a bit more powerful meanwhile schoolkids borrow daddys gun and teach the half the school a lesson. also guns have been developed a freaking lot since sinse the declareation of independence when guns could shoot like 5 bullets a minute now its more like a thousand, pistol is for defence.. sport takes skill nothing about a thousand bullets a minute takes skill. its unnescesary.
stillbillstillbillst 1 year ago
@stillbillstillbillst the only guns that are actually capable of firing "a thousand rounds a minute" are guns such as the minigun which are electrically operated multibarrel weapons. So if you see a guy with a huge battery pack on his back and a weapon that weighs more than he does with 5 barrels coming out of it maybe you should leave the area. Otherwise be worried about the guy with the pistol that can deliver one round, accurately, to your head.
jmcclelland2007 11 months ago
@jmcclelland2007 M4A1 Rate of fire: 700 - 950 rounds per minute- Source worldguns.ru I assume thats without reloading so it couldent actually fire that amount. But it does has the capacity to rapidly empty a clip of high calibre bullets. What about this gun and all others should be legalised letting anyone with a driving licence and a internet connection gain not only a VERY efficient killing tool but the information to use it effectively. just because you shoot cans that does not make it a toy.
stillbillstillbillst 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst first of all do some research on the weapon after around 200 repetitive rounds the barrel heats so much it starts to warp. second go fire a weapon lets say a semi-auto .22 with a 20 round magazine aim at a target about 30-50yds away aim the sights dead center at the target and fire all 20 rounds as quick as you can. count hw many actually hit. very few hand held weapons are designed to shoot accurately at anywhere near those speeds that simply means the action is that fast.
jmcclelland2007 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst Also, assault rifles (civilian) aren't automatic. They fire one round at a time. And I know of no assault rifle that fires a thousand rounds a minute. That would have been nice to have WHEN I WAS IN IRAQ! You obviously don't know anything about guns or about our country. The Founders weren't worried about shooting sprees. They were worried about what you're proposing. The government taking from the people.
DaddyRTO 11 months ago
the creater of this cares nothing about the impact that legalising such a lethal gun could have on crime in america, homfri says we are gonna find another way to kill eachother, sure.. but nothing quite as effective as 1 crazy dude with ten magazines and a assult rifle, your talking triple death figues all across the country. suddenly their legal everyone can get them death rate for gun crimes skyrockets... women and children dead because you wanted a bigger gun to shoot either cans or animals.
stillbillstillbillst 1 year ago
@stillbillstillbillst They are legal. And I haven't heard of any triple digit killing sprees.
DaddyRTO 11 months ago
Well put togeather vid that makes a very good point. My right to own firearms is being infringed upon and i don't like it! All lawmakers (senators, congressmen, ect...) should be required to watch this vid. Laws should exist ''for the people'' not ''against the people''. Having different stocks, mags, grips, ect... don't make the firearms more (or less) dangerous. Just ask someone who has been shot a killed by one if he cares wether he cares if it had a pistol grip on it or not! IMHO
BrianReisbeck 1 year ago
CRIMINALS ARE GOING TO GET GUNS AND KILL US AND WE WILL HAVE NO DEFENSE
supermanben123 1 year ago
@supermanben123 its called a pistol idiot.
stillbillstillbillst 1 year ago
@stillbillstillbillst yeah but what im saying is THEY will have the assualt rifels and a pistol wont be a good defence who do you think would win a guy with a ak-47 or a colt 1911
supermanben123 1 year ago
@supermanben123 so your saying that we should reduce ourselves to just letting everyone have assult rifles because thats gonna work out great.
stillbillstillbillst 1 year ago
@stillbillstillbillst IM JUST SAYING THAT WE HAVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT SO WE CAN HAVE GUNS (EXCEPT FOR HEAVY MACHINEGUNS) WHAT ARE YOU SOME KIND OF HIPPIE!
supermanben123 1 year ago
@supermanben123 if you read my comment i said the second ammendment was written when guns could fire maybe 4 shots a min now its like a thousand thats a fuck tonne more dangerous and the second ammendment is quite frankly out the fuck dated. your just using the second ammendment as a shield to shrug off the impact legal firearms has on society. i come from england and without even researching it i can garenteee we have less % of gun crimes because they are illegle + no accidentental discharges.
stillbillstillbillst 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst If the second amendment doesn't cover modern firearms, then does the first amendment cover words that were not used during the time it was written? Does the fourth amendment not cover your cars or your computers, because those sure as hell weren't around then. Does the eighth amendment allow people to be tortured with electricity because man wasn't able to harness the power of it back when the bill of rights was written? keep to your own country and let us worry about ours.
jcroccoCT 11 months ago 29
@jcroccoCT Keep to your own country and let us worry about ours HA!, thats the most hypocritical statement ever. Americans keeping to themselves, dont be retarded. at least realise what kinda country you live in. litrally one guy just rephrased the second ammendment and thought he was entitled to a assault rifle.I dident really wanna address the ammendments. Dont have a problem with any of them aside from the second as it is allowing people to gain access to killing tools, Regardless of how used
stillbillstillbillst 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst
'thought he was entitled to a assault rifle'
He is.
The 2nd Amendment isn't for hunting ducks, or even self defense.
It is for preventing an American Stalin, or Hitler.
'The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.' - Thomas Jefferson
TheBoberton 11 months ago
@jcroccoCT
Holey shit you nailed that one right on the head.
AustralianPyro 9 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst
To say that there are less gun deaths due to a ban on firearms is to slant the statistics.
If you look at the statistics, crime is increasing in your nation, whilst it is going down in ours.
TheBoberton 11 months ago
@TheBoberton But the Home Office has hit back at the statistics, claiming that the average American is seven times more likely to be murdered than their British counterpart and 60 times more likely to be shot. -BBC news
stillbillstillbillst 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst
In other words:
'Statistics are only correct when they support us.'
TheBoberton 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst maybe less gun crime but much more knife crime in europe. Remember if you take away my gun I'll kill you with a stick. As far as "accidental discharges" if you are reffering to kids getting thier parents weapons, thats a parenting issue not a gun control one.
jmcclelland2007 11 months ago
@jmcclelland2007 only because guns are illegal lol, bottem line you cant run from a gun or see it coming.
stillbillstillbillst 11 months ago
@stillbillstillbillst haha a gun isnt a toy, I agree but its still fun to go out and shoot whether it be a toy or not
Just like how my truck on the road can be very deadly if not driven carefully, but I still like to let loose off-road driving fast and wild and be safe
Just like how I can go to a range or a nice peice of land and let loose with firearms but be much more carful with a firearm when walking the streets
footbalr074 9 months ago
Also theres a much higher chance of me accidently rolling my vehicle or hitting a tree then there is of me having an accidental discharge or accidental shooting
I say therefore I say we ban all atv's, dirtbikes, and trucks, I mean who needs them there dangerous and who needs them, where so progressive nobody needs a truck or atv for work anymore
footbalr074 9 months ago
@supermanben123 You can have heavy machine guns. You just have to pay the $200 dollar tax, file a shit ton of paperwork and then fork out 20,000 - $shitload.00. lol.
backtoiron 11 months ago
@supermanben123 the guy that has better aim and proficiency with his firearm. NEVER JUDGE A GUN BY ITS SIZE
20eXtreme00 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stillbillstillbillst yeah but what im saying is THEY will have the assualt rifels and a pistol wont be a good defence who do you think would win a guy with a ak-47 or a colt 1911 moron
supermanben123 1 year ago
god the us if full of way to many gun happy faggots that all seem to be to retarded to think of the context of the time the constitution was written
jaxfromcanada 1 year ago
@jaxfromcanada the context of the constitution has not changed only the way at which we speak you are clearly the retard if you are to narrow minded to realize this
insanezy 1 year ago
@insanezy no it has the constitution was written when the u.s was only 13 small states and not the massive country it is today. when the constitution was written there was threat form attacks from britan through canada and spain from mexico and cuba so the protection of civilians was needed due to the relitivly small army they were left with now the united states mexico and canada are on good terms as are the u.s an britan militia is no longer a valit term due to the creation of reseve forces
jaxfromcanada 1 year ago
@jaxfromcanada #2 that dowhat militias used to do but are trained using weapons and other equipment that are useful to the new tasks found on the modern battle feild.... let me put it in a simple way. if another suicide attack comes what are you going to do shoot at the plane with an M16?
jaxfromcanada 1 year ago
@jaxfromcanada the need for an armed militia is to fend off an oppressive government the fact that the us is now bigger changes nothing we may not be under threat from britan or wherever the hell else but at some point in time we are going to have to fend for ourselves against our own government thats what he second amendment was created for so the people can at least try and defend themselves
insanezy 1 year ago
@insanezy thats what armys and allies are for or in the united states case a new style of govt that actually prevents psycos getting in
jaxfromcanada 1 year ago
@jaxfromcanada And who do you think is going to force out the old government and put a new one in??? the militia made by the people. the army's will do what they are told by the government that includes the people who are trying to overthrow an oppressive government and the allies are allies to the government not the people they wouldnt be any help either
insanezy 1 year ago
@jaxfromcanada No you just can't read.
lockdown260 1 year ago
@jaxfromcanada It doesn't matter what the "context of time" was when it was written. That was the point. What posed a threat to Liberty then still does today. Our Constitution was written to remain a foundation for our country. If the foundation is constantly changing, how can a building stand?
DaddyRTO 11 months ago
@DaddyRTO with out removing the rotting wood and rusty beams how can a building stand?
jaxfromcanada 11 months ago
@jaxfromcanada Explain.
DaddyRTO 11 months ago
@DaddyRTO the entire idea of the armed miliia i understand. but with the entire idea is old and it needs to be at least re worked i guess my real issue is that people have like stockpiles of weapons in their basements and the constitution needs to make at least limiting weapons and controll of these weapons so that he american people can be safer.......
jaxfromcanada 11 months ago
@jaxfromcanada
Ah, but the Constitution does not say 'The right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, except for this gun because it's scary-looking.'
The Second Amendment is there to allow the American people to prevent the government (Or that of another nation) taking over.
TheBoberton 11 months ago
@DaddyRTO part 2 sry if that dosent make sence like i get where everyone else is coming from just think that even if these weapons were used against a rogue government they need to be beter regulated than they are now.
jaxfromcanada 11 months ago
@jaxfromcanada If the government becomes rogue, how will regulating weapons help? If the government regulates them and then decides to usurp its power (go rogue) it will just take the guns away. Any power we give to the government is a right that we lose.
DaddyRTO 11 months ago
@jaxfromcanada How would the "American people be safer" if they do not have access to the tools to defend themselves? And how does a stockpile of firearms cause an immediate danger? I have never seen nor heard a gun commit an evil or malicious act, without an evil or malicious person behind it.
savage495 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jaxfromcanada
'used against a rogue government they need to be beter regulated'
Oh yes, because said 'rogue' government wouldn't use the records of who owns what gun to their advantage.
That would be REALLY dishonorable, thus they wouldn't do it.
TheBoberton 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DaddyRTO with out removing the rotting wood and rusty beams how can a building stand?
jaxfromcanada 11 months ago
@mauiboy are you serious? Do you think criminals buy guns from places that sell them legally? Then how do they get fully automatic weapons? Cause believe me they have them. You need to stop listening to the news and every other retarded democrat that thinks they know what's right for me own.
numberonezero83