Just so some people do know. Just because as kids we are taught these guys lived 65 millions yrs ago, this does not make it true. They fail to teach kids or mention that the science invovled in dating is argued. Carbon dating can't be done because all carbon has deterioted, so they reference off of the atomic time/orbital time "assuming(nice word)" that it remained constant since the beginning of time. Very fat chance there huh?
@thetexanfan Something which science needs to get rid of, is the theory of evolution and its geologic column. Modern scientists see the geologic column as sacred (no joke) and are limited to think that anything bellow millions of years is wrong. But what will they believe in then? That sounds like religion to me.
@BUNGLE7777777 You are right. I know this, and you know this but,scientist are still in denial. Also there is this arrogance and sense of royalty that they seem to embellish when presenting their "so-called" facts. We are just peasants and shouldn't bite the hand that feeds us our technology. This is our lack of appreciation, becuase we use computers and cell phones and don't acknowledge that they invented it for us.Ha Ha Ha They are the blind ones now and hide the truth as did the Catholics.
Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. There are at least sixteen different known instances of common retrogene insertions between chimps and humans. The Odds of 16 in the exact same place are not possible unless evolution is true.
@gregrutz This is your science? You base your conclusion on odds? This is because everything there is to know about DNA is known?. Again, just read they are undertaking a huge task in breaking down the DNA and how little we know about it. You on the other hand, have it all figured out. By the way, you know carbon dating is not reliable or accepted as truth in aging the dinosaurs. How did the scientist decide when they appeared again?
@gregrutz You could be book smart but you lack logic and common sense. Your reasoning and lack of being open minded creates problems with your science. I know you would just love to tell me more stories about dino's and what they looked like, what they ate, what sound they made, how long they lived, how they mated...etc. this is your love. Does not mean everything you were taught was the truth, you just thought it was.
@gregrutz This is so sad dude.I am surfing from one site to another...googling this and that. Not one person can say for a fact just how old them bones are . So much difference that some say with the knowledge we have now, it shows these fossiles to be more recent than previously thought. Not 65 million or so, more like 15 to 20,000 yrs old. Falling in line with creation verses evolution. Just the facts is what I am reading you. I guess you believe what you wanna, u r 1 that doesn't need proof.
@thetexanfan The ‘Super Group’ of rocks in the Grand Canyon is below the level layers at the east end. These layers were laid down level, block faulted into mountains , worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over the basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind blown desert sands, some corals. Then the whole area was raised to 8000 feet above sea level. Finally water flowing down hill cut the canyon. How long do you think this took?
@gregrutz I was going to comment on your closed mindedness, but I enjoy reading how someone from the 18th century is still living today, and still continue to think as you. Yeah, Montana has dinosaur bones there and from that you tracked to their entire migration pattern, knew how the Earth was exactlly connected(tectonic plates), and know when they existed and can also tell just from that, the inca stones are out-dated and innaccurate.I have to ask, but have you ever sold 1 book that you wrote?
@gregrutz No...I watch the video and find it interesting. You will not see me breaking down the true History of mankind as though I hold the truth.Nobody really knows it.You have to admit,with or without the stones, we have to many "out of time/date" artifacts.They just don't fit. Way way too many ancients text and writings that show a different beginning than what you or I believed. You like evolution, me?, I like creation. Just both have holes and try keeping an open mind vs being offended.
@thetexanfan ''way too many ancients text show... '' And that is what you base all your faith in, ancients text. Try reading a science book and catch up with the rest of the world.
We know about dinosaurs from the fossils, and the people who study those fossils say the dinosaurs stoppec making fossils 65 million years ago.
Thy also say 99% of the species that ever lived on the earth are extinct !
@gregrutz Hey Gregrutz! Take a few moments of your time and readinga few comments on here. You suggest me to raed some history books. Show me where I said I based my faith on ancient text. Tick tock tick tock....Faith and belief does not need proof by the way. Science and history are having to re-write their books because they are flawed with lies..We do not know when Dinosaurs existed, we "BELIEVE" it was 65 millionyrs ago. You seem to struggle with the little words. You are FUBAR,keep walking.
@thetexanfan So you don't base your religion on an old book and your 'belief' is by faith only. That's nice. I don't care.
Scientinst KNOW that Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some small ones with feathers. Read a science book
@gregrutz ok. Here we go. If you are going to preach about something being fact, be prepared to supply some proof. You try to speak for me and when I correct you, you say you don't care. Tell you what, stop pretending you do care and I will not be confused as to what you are typing about...ok? Post a link that proves anything you believe in. Sad...like so many others, you read about something and just grew up thinking it was the truth. I bet Santa was a huge blow to you huh?
@thetexanfan ''We do not know when Dinosaurs existed, we "BELIEVE" it was 65 millionyrs ago'' You don't even know the facts.
Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some small ones with feathers.
@gregrutz ok....I can tell you are just a geek that likes to play with dinosaur toys and grew up knowing everythinhg there is to know and know you wanna act all "I know everything there is to know about dinosaurs, just ask me". Just take the time to post 1 site or link that states it is as fact as not hypothesis on when the dinosaurs did exist. I do know the facts, you just thought you did. Please supply a link to this proof.
@gregrutz Why do you tell me all this stuff? I DON'T CARE(back at you baby). These are only your opinion and unfortunately, everytime you read something, your eyes kept missing the word "predict", "theory", "believed", "hypothesis" and "think". Everything you have said is only guessing. Though it is an educated guess, by no means is it proven. This video alone proves we do not know everything there is to know about physics or even what we "THINK" we know, could be wrong.
@thetexanfan You have no idea what scientists know. Get an education.
There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.
There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of biologists.
@gregrutz Wow...Just a big WOW!....Evolution is now proven? I just read where they thought they found that missing link and you are saying they found it. Yes...all life is connected or related...and from this...you are saying they said this proves evolution? At least Biology has a backbone, you seem to use it as a crutch to excuse anything that doesn't fit. You seem to type a lot of fiction...try backing it up with facts and not your 2 bit opinion next time. There is no proof dude!
@gregrutz ""There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution"" this was good....this part was a waste..."proves how all life is related to all life". Uh....The bible stated this long ago. Glad science is STILL catching up proving what we already knew as a fact, still is just that...." A FACT ". What a huge waste of money and science trying to make that connection. Just what has evolved in say...ol...the last 2000yrs? Let me guess, it takes millions so you can't prove it.
Several of the stones appear to have exactly the same stuff (at 3:40) on them as the Nazca lines, the monkey, humming bird, spider, etc. So these stones were copied from the lines, or the lines copied from the stones. Weren't the Incas more recent than when the Nazca lines were made?
name of the song? i love it so much Men have always been intelligent even under monkey apparence ! yes they killed dinosaurs and tore tore so much when the last one was dead so they made of them GODS the Snake god issued from waters saurian.
i did a search and found conflicting info. 1 thing that was the same on both sides of the issue is that the stones have been obtained under suspicious circumstances. Of course, the side in favor their validity words it differently though. To my understanding the place where they were obtained from is an integral part of the practice of archaeology. The source cold be the difference between a probable fraud or not, yet from what I've read, the closest pple to said source have been shady about it
Wow, oh my goodness, i'm totally awestruck on how... this video SUCKS. The music belongs in a computer hacker video, not this. And what's up with the horney lady moan in the backbeat. I know what it is... tweaker crap. Thumbs down to the ground
While it's been proven that some rocks have been made to sell to tourist, Dr. Cabrera bought THOUSANDS from his original person, a farmer. The farmer would have had to make one stone a day for 40 years to make that many.
I dunno about that. Many believe the original rocks are legit, while certainly many later were made for profit.
@alexchavez777 After being hauled in to the police station and questioned about the stones, because it is illegal to rob graves and you will to to jail for a long time, the farmer said that he made them. He later hired some people to make stones for him to prove that he was making them. Theses were not of the same quality artwork and there was not patina varnish in the grooves of the etchings.
If something doesn't fit into the already-established scientific box, it's automatically deemed a "hoax". Very anti-science to have a pre-conceived notion and force everything to fit into it, witness testimony be damned.
people are led to believe in radioisotope dating that's proven to be unreliable due to natural disasters (decay rate is NOT constant), instead of eye-witness testimony of people who were actually there.
Simple and sad how easily we're fooled, and how little value we place in the evidence of people before us.
These fake stones are made for tourists. No scientist falls for this creationist balony. Evolution is what happened and if your religion can't survive this simple fact then its time to drop your superstition and join the growing atheist movement. Please don't show your lack of intelligence by saying atheism is a religion. Thats like saying not collecting stamps is a hobby.
If anyone can show me a frog in the millions of transitional stages of becoming a salamander id like to see it!
Id like to add that evolution contradicts itself completely! When is anything at its weakest? During transition. That even applies to businesses and governments. Its a undisputable general principle of existence! Transition means weakness and susceptibility.
If it takes millions of years for organisms to change nothing would have made it. Nothing!
Takes more faith to believe that the ENTIRE universe as specifically ordered as it is just happened than to believe that a Creator created the heavens and the earth. In fact that kinda faith doesnt exist. It isnt faith. Its foolishness which is what most of evolution is.
There is only form of evolution which exists and can be observed and thats macro evolution which is just like things changing over time through inter breeding and environmental adaptations. Cosmic, Macro, Chemical? Nope!
Id also like to point out that there are drawing all over the planet of what looks like anything from dinosaurs to aliens. I really dont think anything other than that can be said.
I believe God created the heavens and the earth but I do not believe the earth is 6000 years old any more than I believe catholicism to be a Christian religion.
If you read Sumerian texts or even the Book of Enoch youll find 5000 years ago people knew the earth was round. That information was lost like other things.
The best thing about this is that it was all proven to be a hoax! The doctor himself admitted to making them himself in order to attract tourists! Just do a simple google search of the Ica Stone Hoax... fun times
Actually little dumb child? The Inca Stones were brought from Peru to Spain in the 17th century. The guy who carved images in stones DID NOT create these images he simply copied them.
So in other words he made FAKE COPIES of the ORIGINAL INCA STONES so he could open a museum and profit from it. Thus he didnt make them. He copied them!
How bout ya actually do some research instead of using google as a convenient stumbling block to youre already wavering intelligence.
@Davemustang2600 First of all I love how you come right out and call me a little dumb child. A nice way of introducing yourself. I'm sure that he got his inspiration from somewhere, and not all the stones were forgeries, but the images of people riding on dinosaurs certainly aren't authentic, he admitted it himself. He did that to cause a stir. Don't you creationists have other pieces of "evidence" to cling to besides this pathetic lie?
Evidence? Did you actually ask for evidence? Man you are an idiot. Okay look around dummy! The ENTIRE universe depends on ORDER and not just any order a very SPECIFIC ORDER. ORDER doesnt just happen. Everything in the universe speaks of a creator. You deny that creator because you feel diminished by His existence. Youre only diminished when you believe a lie.
Furthermore, Evolution has presented NO EVIDENCE! Not one shred! Missing link? DUDE! Theres MILLIONS of missing links!
An evolutionists from Berkeley admitted in an interview that evolutions biggest weakness is that there isnt
a single example of ANYTHING turning into something else in the beloved fossil record. In other words, you have different species that evolved naturally in groups such as horses, zebras, donkeys, etc over time but there isnt ONE EXAMPLE of MICRO EVOLUTION which is ONE THING RISING FROM ANOTHER THING!
Why millions of missing links? Because micro evolution doesnt happen!
Micro evolution simply states that EVERYTHING came from the same matter. That basically we all came from amphibians and reptiles and BS such as that. Yet, there isnt a SINGLE EXAMPLE of these TRANSITIONARY stages of one species giving rise to a completely different species! The chromosomal difference between us and apes is what 3 percent? Big deal! The DNA difference is like 300 percent! That makes us as different from apes as you to a cherry tree.
@Davemustang2600 Boyo, there goes another creationist. If i've argued with a creationist once i've done it a million times. Do you realize how old and recycled your arguments are? Do you think, in my experience of "interacting" with creationists, that I haven't heard all this before? You are ignorant if you dont know how tired and old your arguments are and how they have been refuted countless times."No transitional fossils" is sooooooo old. Also, learn to refrain from using ad hominem attacks.
Dude ad hominem? lol What are youre a dumb catholic too? Ya just in love with 1500 year old Latin?
Heres some more ad hominem for ya! YOURE A MORON!
Youve never argued with me little infant.
You have nothing! Youre a subscriber to the idiocy of scientists who betray the very science they claim to live by! What is science little infant? What is it? The drive towards fundamentals TRUTHS of the universe! Whats the basis of ALL science little infant? OBSERVATION!
In science the rule is IF IT CANNOT BE OBSERVED THEN IT CANNOT BE STUDIED! IF IT CANT BE STUDIED THEN NO HYPOTHESIS CAN OFFERED!
Only ONE SINGLE FORM of evolution has been observed! ONE! Can you count to one dummy? Hold up one finger! ONE! And that is MACRO Evolution. Chemical, organic, cosmic, etc NEVER BEEN OBSERVED! Not even from digging around in the earth! ITS ALL CONJECTURE!
@Davemustang2600 BOORRINNGG!!! Same old recycled crock Ive heard before. For the love of GOD, give me something GROUND-BREAKING for once, something interesting that will leave me baffled and speechless. Something I havent already seen and hasn't already been refuted a million times. Same old recycled arguments ("no transitional forms!!!" "Macroevolution cant be observed!!!") and finally, same old insults (ad hominem) Also you totally messed up one of your arguments.Youre boring me to death here!
Listen to me you half baked bloviating numb skulled king of idiots and footstool of fools!
You havent said one single shred of information. Not one!
So you get to shut up. Got it? All you've proven is that youre more unlearned and less worthy to speak on issues like this than these poor ignorant religious freaks you hate so much.
People like you man are classic! You go around the world and circle the bushes to say NOTHING!!!
Why dont you bring all of us poor deluded creationists proof contradicting what the TOP scientists in evolutions have already admitted! Do you know more than these guys? Heck man. I dont think youre IQ gets out of the 80s! Youre circular reasoning and dumb bell thinking proves it!
Bring me an example of the millions of transition stages of an amphibian evolving into a reptile?
Oh, you cant! Hmmm. Now why is that? BECAUSE IT DIDNT HAPPEN!~ MORON!
Explain to all of us how DNA changes? Tell me doofas! Why cant humans breed with apes? Why cant dogs breed with cats? Because of barriers in DNA! The very tenets of evolution are illogical and summarily comical. Do you know how much DNA information is present in a rat? Who wrote the DNA codes? Who said which DNA codes work producing what life forms? Can DNA evolve? NO! in over 40 years weve known about DNA every test proves it cannot replicate anything other than its source code.
In other words Chumlee, DNA has to be written like a computer program. It cannot change and it cannot evolve. As far as cells go mutation is ALWAYS unfavorable. Its what we call cancer! When you begin to look at chemical reaction and their basis in biological systems the more and more evolution unravels like a badly woven cheap sweater. All evolution has is in the rocks. It begins and ends there. Because when you look inside the bodies of life forms nothing bears out.
@Davemustang2600 truth is i dont have the time or energy to argue with you when i know what the end result will be.... your constant stream of insults is very off-putting and your arguments are very unoriginal... i will not type the same response for the millionth time. Goodbye.
@Davemustang2600 My final message to you: If you were an actual, honest, sincere truth seeker, you would do genuine research on your own instead of trolling Youtube and provoking others. Your comments show that you have no true knowledge of the subject at all, except for what you want to believe is true. Your immaturity is best displayed in your constant insults which are totally irrelevant to the topic at hand. As a decent person I need not interact with people like you. Good-bye.
@Davemustang2600 It's usually the people that resort to immature name calling that lack the evidence and intelligence. The Bible is a history book that you can't refute. Wake up to the truth. Stop denying it because of self pride.
@R0gyo The fish lived in shallow oceans and then the land is raised up over millions of years. Plate tectonics was proven in the 1950's A global flood was proven wrong 200 years ago.
I'd imagine that if you're going to base your beliefs off Incan artifacts then I'd probably guess that whatever religion the Incan's had is also yours.
Lol youre not intelligent enough to call it a hoax. You call it a hoax for the same reason people choose evolution as science and not the absent of religion which is essentially a religion itself being based and formed wholly around religion to begin with.
Whether or not dinosaurs coexisted with man is irrelevant. Unimportant! Its a non issue!
The specificity of the origins of life do not hinge on what species existed together but where these species came from.
The stones also depict planes and other modern technology. The Ica area where they were supposedly found has a history of 100-800CE. Clearly the stones are modern fakes. The overwhelming archaeological facts prove that dinosaurs did not exist at that time. If you think dinosaurs lived 2,000 years ago, in the time of Jesus, you have rocks in your head.
@imagineN0religion Here's an exerpt from an article by Dennis L. Swift, who went to Peru and saw the stones first hand. "However, the stone, of high density, smooth andesite (a volcanic rock), has several areas deeply encrusted with desert sand, especially covering some of the engraved areas showing leaves. It has a film of oxidation over it, and the segment of T. rex's lower leg and foot are well worn. The fact that the therapod is not a good representation of T. rex (the front legs are too...
@imagineN0religion ...long) is further evidence against a modern forgery. The frill-like treatment along the back suggests the artist may have been drawing something like Spinosaurus." There are no "archaeological facts" that dinosaurs didn't live back then besides dating methods that are inaccurate. There are also other depictions of dinosaurs many other places, such as Roman mosaics, if you would consider that a more trustable source, but then again, you won't. I can't make the blind see.
@imagineN0religion I suggest you get over the fact that you're wrong, stop imagining, and start looking into Christainity. God would love to have you. It's eternity we're talking about here.
my comments have nothing to do with religion, but if you must know I have done a great deal of study into christianity and was involved for about 8 years. Your faith is your personal choice. I wish you all the best with it but dont confuse it with knowledge. If you read widley enough and not just creationst literature you may come to an alternative conclusion on the dinosaur engravings and the history of the earth.
Why is this some big revelation? We knew about these stones a long time ago. Some people just denied/deny/will deny it, because it doesn't fit their versions of our past reality. Their paradigm won't allow it. Their "Matrix" won't allow it. Also, we know that our ancestors purposly destroyed the invaded' civilisation/culture/history to "erase their past" instill their futur. He who controls the past controls the futur. Maybe both are true.............boo!
1billion1deaths1 You sound like a man who really knows his drugs!
Your explanation of how the Inca's traveled time was very entertaining. Explains how they traveled into the 21st century, lifted these phony rocks at a local tourist shop, and took 'em back to show their friends!
Whatever you're smokin' it's gotta be premium quality!
The inca's traveld threw hyper dimension with potions and rituals that involved death and supernatural metaphysical beings of instant space time portation travel. They could travel back and fourth into the future & past, any place time or day of excistence. Disappeared sucked into the earth by the physical&mental law.
See how much more is out there when you do psychedelics, the governments of today are keeping us from seeing the rest of the world's in our heads/universe.
En 1975 J. J. Benítez escribió el libro "Existió otra Humanidad", hay indicios por todo el mundo sobre que pudo haber existido una gran civizacion , que huvo vida inteligente es este planeta mucho mas antes que nosotros y que por razones desconocidas ellos desaparecieron
@NEVALOVE Not Inca, this is lost civilization. Its miracle, that this civilization is so advanced. Everything came in 100 years, before that there werent any tvs, cars, phones...
@thoostorm4 I CAN'T!! , cause your momma stole it from me, instead of buying a new one from the store... she's a nasty pig... just like you, and you're the result of her slutty trailer trash whoreness behavior...
Go f@ck your cat you loser, at least you'll have a pussy to brag about... Nice to meet you too asshole... LOL
@justinbrayshaw In 1973 Uschuya confirmed that he had forged the stones during an interview with Erich von Däniken, copying the images from comic books, text books and magazines but later recanted that claim during an interview with a German journalist, saying that he had claimed they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological artifacts.
There is countless amounts of evidence proving just about everything we`ve been taught is a lie. They are so call "out of place artifacts". Because they conflict with current beliefs they aren`t made public, or are considered a hoax without evidence of such, or simply ignored and hidden. Not all having to do with religion either. Just things like who really discovered what first, Neanderthals having bullet holes in their skulls, human footprints found in the same rock as dinosaurs. Just a few.
@vme1111 ....i honestly dont think that thousands of scientists have got it so wrong or are apart of some giant conspiracy. all it would take is for some reputable scientist to blow the whistle and the whole thing would be exposed. no..these carvings have already been proven to be a hoax, the makers of them have admitted it and the point ive made is that the dinos have been miss- drawn in a trend that we did up untill just recently....these are facts.
@thehaleo Well did you hear about the reason and story why they "confessed"? Besides, even if these are hoaxes, there`s still tons of more evidence making the same statement that aren`t disclosed.
@sicario1919 That's nice, but no man alive today is 5500 years old and can verify the age. Always take dates with a grain of salt. Some are based on erroneous data and methods, others I believe are fabricated to discredit the Bible in the minds of the multitude. How did they come up with that figure?
A LOT OF THESE CREATURES HAVE BEEN HIDDEN, JUST LIKE THE FIRE BREATHING DRAGON "LEVIATHAN' THAT THE LORD HAS HIDDEN FOR THE DAY OF PAY BACK IN THE LAST DAYS. HE 'S GONNA BE LOOSE SOON, JUST WATCH!! SHALAM
to add more....it was also a common misconception that two legged dinosaurs stood up right. they didnt. but they are drawn this way in the carvings. if man had seen dinosaurs they wouldnt have made the same misake in drawing them because the backs ware flat with the tail counter weighing the head and would have been drawn as suck...
@thehaleo How can you draw the conclusion that two-legged dinosaurs weren't able to stand upright? Oh yeah, you read it in a magazine. As a rule archaelogists find fragments of dinosaurs (they found a "graveyard" of dinosaur bones though, the skeleton parts were scrambled all over the place). There are animals today that lean forward as they run, but stand upright while still, and vice versa. Also, dinosaurs before the Flood lived under other conditions, they were stronger = straighter tails.
@joroma77 Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.
@joroma77 ....incorrect. it is common knowledge now that the spacing between the vertibrae wont allow it. up untill the 80's dino skeletons were assembled with the tails flowing along the ground (as is with these carvings). this left too large a gap in the backbone at the point where the tail angles out to follow the ground. prehaps you should do more reading yourself then you would know this.....
@joroma77 cont:...so when this discovery was made, all the skeletons were taken down and re-assembled following the exact spacing between the vertibrae. this left the tails high in the air acting as counterweights. these carvings, it could be forgiven for one or two to be drawn in the same mistake but for all of them?...lol....come on...
ok...the tails on nearly all act as a counterweight for the head and necks. with early skeletons not being assembled properly, it was assumed that the tails were close to the ground. they were not.my reference to ray was that the dinosours he made in all his dino films were portrayed the same way as were books up untill just recently. so are the carvings in this video. the backbones were more or less straight because the tails were high in the air. these carvings are copyed from early books...
On these stones the sauropods are depicted as mammals. The structure of a triceratops is that of a mammal. These shouldn't be called "dinosaurs"; they aren't lizards!
these are fake. the dinosaurs have been drawn in ray harryhausen style. its only in recent years weve found out that the backbones were more or less straight....this would mean the dinosaurs have a very different image....
@thehaleo I checked out Ray Harryhausen's work and it looks nothing like these depictions. He made animated man skeletons, snakes/lizards with human head or men with lizard heads. True, some of his creatures looked like regular dinosaurs, but so did the exhibits in museums of his day. He just had to copy them. What's funny is that most of his dinosaur models had straight backs!
@thehaleo yes. Some of these Dinosaurs have circles on them. Nobody knew that Dinosaurs had circles on their skin untill Dinosaurskin was found. Maybe the Dinosaur stones which doesn't have cirlces on the Dinosaurs are hoax.
man at 00:48 has nice winky
saqsay1 22 hours ago in playlist Unexplained - Artifacts
Just so some people do know. Just because as kids we are taught these guys lived 65 millions yrs ago, this does not make it true. They fail to teach kids or mention that the science invovled in dating is argued. Carbon dating can't be done because all carbon has deterioted, so they reference off of the atomic time/orbital time "assuming(nice word)" that it remained constant since the beginning of time. Very fat chance there huh?
thetexanfan 2 days ago
@thetexanfan Something which science needs to get rid of, is the theory of evolution and its geologic column. Modern scientists see the geologic column as sacred (no joke) and are limited to think that anything bellow millions of years is wrong. But what will they believe in then? That sounds like religion to me.
BUNGLE7777777 1 day ago
@BUNGLE7777777 You are right. I know this, and you know this but,scientist are still in denial. Also there is this arrogance and sense of royalty that they seem to embellish when presenting their "so-called" facts. We are just peasants and shouldn't bite the hand that feeds us our technology. This is our lack of appreciation, becuase we use computers and cell phones and don't acknowledge that they invented it for us.Ha Ha Ha They are the blind ones now and hide the truth as did the Catholics.
thetexanfan 1 day ago
@thetexanfan Evolution was accepted 150 years ago, you are in denial. Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 160 million years, FACT.
Your church evolved from the Catholics, the first christians.
gregrutz 17 hours ago
@BUNGLE7777777 ''the theory of evolution and its geologic column''.
The Geologic column is from...tada...Geology.
Why are the fossils layered simple to complex?
Why are most of the species extinct?
gregrutz 17 hours ago
Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. There are at least sixteen different known instances of common retrogene insertions between chimps and humans. The Odds of 16 in the exact same place are not possible unless evolution is true.
gregrutz 2 days ago
@gregrutz This is your science? You base your conclusion on odds? This is because everything there is to know about DNA is known?. Again, just read they are undertaking a huge task in breaking down the DNA and how little we know about it. You on the other hand, have it all figured out. By the way, you know carbon dating is not reliable or accepted as truth in aging the dinosaurs. How did the scientist decide when they appeared again?
thetexanfan 2 days ago
@gregrutz You could be book smart but you lack logic and common sense. Your reasoning and lack of being open minded creates problems with your science. I know you would just love to tell me more stories about dino's and what they looked like, what they ate, what sound they made, how long they lived, how they mated...etc. this is your love. Does not mean everything you were taught was the truth, you just thought it was.
thetexanfan 2 days ago
@gregrutz This is so sad dude.I am surfing from one site to another...googling this and that. Not one person can say for a fact just how old them bones are . So much difference that some say with the knowledge we have now, it shows these fossiles to be more recent than previously thought. Not 65 million or so, more like 15 to 20,000 yrs old. Falling in line with creation verses evolution. Just the facts is what I am reading you. I guess you believe what you wanna, u r 1 that doesn't need proof.
thetexanfan 2 days ago
@thetexanfan The ‘Super Group’ of rocks in the Grand Canyon is below the level layers at the east end. These layers were laid down level, block faulted into mountains , worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over the basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind blown desert sands, some corals. Then the whole area was raised to 8000 feet above sea level. Finally water flowing down hill cut the canyon. How long do you think this took?
gregrutz 2 days ago
@gregrutz It took God only a day. ....Tag on a few extra days and I can come close. :)
thetexanfan 2 days ago
Why don't any of these look like dinosaurs?!?
gregrutz 3 days ago
I thought these were proven to be fake.
Christopher1889 2 weeks ago
This is your evidence?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz LOL, evidence for what?
jignc1984 3 weeks ago
@jignc1984 This is their evidence that man rode dinosaurs. The closest dinosaur fossils are in Montana, good thing they have some rocks for tourists.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz I was going to comment on your closed mindedness, but I enjoy reading how someone from the 18th century is still living today, and still continue to think as you. Yeah, Montana has dinosaur bones there and from that you tracked to their entire migration pattern, knew how the Earth was exactlly connected(tectonic plates), and know when they existed and can also tell just from that, the inca stones are out-dated and innaccurate.I have to ask, but have you ever sold 1 book that you wrote?
thetexanfan 5 days ago
@thetexanfan So if inca stones show men riding dinosaurs you believe them just becasue you think it proves evolution wrong. LOL.
gregrutz 5 days ago
@gregrutz No...I watch the video and find it interesting. You will not see me breaking down the true History of mankind as though I hold the truth.Nobody really knows it.You have to admit,with or without the stones, we have to many "out of time/date" artifacts.They just don't fit. Way way too many ancients text and writings that show a different beginning than what you or I believed. You like evolution, me?, I like creation. Just both have holes and try keeping an open mind vs being offended.
thetexanfan 5 days ago
@thetexanfan ''way too many ancients text show... '' And that is what you base all your faith in, ancients text. Try reading a science book and catch up with the rest of the world.
We know about dinosaurs from the fossils, and the people who study those fossils say the dinosaurs stoppec making fossils 65 million years ago.
Thy also say 99% of the species that ever lived on the earth are extinct !
gregrutz 4 days ago
@gregrutz Hey Gregrutz! Take a few moments of your time and readinga few comments on here. You suggest me to raed some history books. Show me where I said I based my faith on ancient text. Tick tock tick tock....Faith and belief does not need proof by the way. Science and history are having to re-write their books because they are flawed with lies..We do not know when Dinosaurs existed, we "BELIEVE" it was 65 millionyrs ago. You seem to struggle with the little words. You are FUBAR,keep walking.
thetexanfan 4 days ago
@thetexanfan So you don't base your religion on an old book and your 'belief' is by faith only. That's nice. I don't care.
Scientinst KNOW that Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some small ones with feathers. Read a science book
gregrutz 3 days ago
@gregrutz ok. Here we go. If you are going to preach about something being fact, be prepared to supply some proof. You try to speak for me and when I correct you, you say you don't care. Tell you what, stop pretending you do care and I will not be confused as to what you are typing about...ok? Post a link that proves anything you believe in. Sad...like so many others, you read about something and just grew up thinking it was the truth. I bet Santa was a huge blow to you huh?
thetexanfan 3 days ago
@thetexanfan Yup, I believed in Santa until I saw 3 of them at the mall. They have now found 3 Noah's Arks. LOL.
gregrutz 2 days ago
@thetexanfan ''We do not know when Dinosaurs existed, we "BELIEVE" it was 65 millionyrs ago'' You don't even know the facts.
Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some small ones with feathers.
gregrutz 2 days ago
@gregrutz ok....I can tell you are just a geek that likes to play with dinosaur toys and grew up knowing everythinhg there is to know and know you wanna act all "I know everything there is to know about dinosaurs, just ask me". Just take the time to post 1 site or link that states it is as fact as not hypothesis on when the dinosaurs did exist. I do know the facts, you just thought you did. Please supply a link to this proof.
thetexanfan 2 days ago
@thetexanfan I don't ''like evolution'' It is a fact, documented and observed, proven.
''many ancients text and writings that show a different beginning'' Yes,
Every religion does have a different creation story and a different creator god.
gregrutz 3 days ago
@gregrutz Why do you tell me all this stuff? I DON'T CARE(back at you baby). These are only your opinion and unfortunately, everytime you read something, your eyes kept missing the word "predict", "theory", "believed", "hypothesis" and "think". Everything you have said is only guessing. Though it is an educated guess, by no means is it proven. This video alone proves we do not know everything there is to know about physics or even what we "THINK" we know, could be wrong.
thetexanfan 3 days ago
@thetexanfan You have no idea what scientists know. Get an education.
There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.
There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of biologists.
gregrutz 2 days ago
@gregrutz Wow...Just a big WOW!....Evolution is now proven? I just read where they thought they found that missing link and you are saying they found it. Yes...all life is connected or related...and from this...you are saying they said this proves evolution? At least Biology has a backbone, you seem to use it as a crutch to excuse anything that doesn't fit. You seem to type a lot of fiction...try backing it up with facts and not your 2 bit opinion next time. There is no proof dude!
thetexanfan 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz ""There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution"" this was good....this part was a waste..."proves how all life is related to all life". Uh....The bible stated this long ago. Glad science is STILL catching up proving what we already knew as a fact, still is just that...." A FACT ". What a huge waste of money and science trying to make that connection. Just what has evolved in say...ol...the last 2000yrs? Let me guess, it takes millions so you can't prove it.
thetexanfan 2 days ago
At :47 the man has a dong that goes half way to his feet. This proves the Incas are hung and had sex with large dinosarus.
gregrutz 1 month ago
Maybe we had to defeat the dinosaurs in the past! lol
MadeInOregon27 1 month ago
!.56 looks like a kangaroo.. these are so interesting.
doctortwyla 1 month ago
Several of the stones appear to have exactly the same stuff (at 3:40) on them as the Nazca lines, the monkey, humming bird, spider, etc. So these stones were copied from the lines, or the lines copied from the stones. Weren't the Incas more recent than when the Nazca lines were made?
61804shill 1 month ago
looks fake. Plus this generic song ruins video
Globox822 1 month ago
This proves it that there was and probably still is theses creatures living with humans.
A great clip which is rareLy seen on YT.
Leowen2 1 month ago
name of the song? i love it so much Men have always been intelligent even under monkey apparence ! yes they killed dinosaurs and tore tore so much when the last one was dead so they made of them GODS the Snake god issued from waters saurian.
taniadevasconcelos 2 months ago
@taniadevasconcelos name of the song - Rob Dougan - Clubbed To Death
PapaSmurfsays1 2 months ago
another miracle in the holy quran ?! jajajaja, yes Men knew Dinosaurs !
taniadevasconcelos 2 months ago
remember when everyone thought t-rex walked upright, see even the Inca's got it wrong @ 0:35; or that is godzilla lol
plwpahi 2 months ago
i did a search and found conflicting info. 1 thing that was the same on both sides of the issue is that the stones have been obtained under suspicious circumstances. Of course, the side in favor their validity words it differently though. To my understanding the place where they were obtained from is an integral part of the practice of archaeology. The source cold be the difference between a probable fraud or not, yet from what I've read, the closest pple to said source have been shady about it
handom85 2 months ago in playlist Dinos
@handom85 obviously; what else what they say? evolution is not true? they have to make up an excuse now to match what they think is right.
R0gyo 3 weeks ago
Wow, oh my goodness, i'm totally awestruck on how... this video SUCKS. The music belongs in a computer hacker video, not this. And what's up with the horney lady moan in the backbeat. I know what it is... tweaker crap. Thumbs down to the ground
jaymorpheus11 2 months ago
While it's been proven that some rocks have been made to sell to tourist, Dr. Cabrera bought THOUSANDS from his original person, a farmer. The farmer would have had to make one stone a day for 40 years to make that many.
I dunno about that. Many believe the original rocks are legit, while certainly many later were made for profit.
alexchavez777 3 months ago
@alexchavez777 After being hauled in to the police station and questioned about the stones, because it is illegal to rob graves and you will to to jail for a long time, the farmer said that he made them. He later hired some people to make stones for him to prove that he was making them. Theses were not of the same quality artwork and there was not patina varnish in the grooves of the etchings.
AndyG792 2 months ago
If something doesn't fit into the already-established scientific box, it's automatically deemed a "hoax". Very anti-science to have a pre-conceived notion and force everything to fit into it, witness testimony be damned.
alexchavez777 3 months ago
people are led to believe in radioisotope dating that's proven to be unreliable due to natural disasters (decay rate is NOT constant), instead of eye-witness testimony of people who were actually there.
Simple and sad how easily we're fooled, and how little value we place in the evidence of people before us.
alexchavez777 3 months ago
@alexchavez777 "decay rate is NOT constant"
You know it? Present a proof or shut up.
MucusFelidae 2 months ago
These fake stones are made for tourists. No scientist falls for this creationist balony. Evolution is what happened and if your religion can't survive this simple fact then its time to drop your superstition and join the growing atheist movement. Please don't show your lack of intelligence by saying atheism is a religion. Thats like saying not collecting stamps is a hobby.
Cainkane1 3 months ago
If anyone can show me a frog in the millions of transitional stages of becoming a salamander id like to see it!
Id like to add that evolution contradicts itself completely! When is anything at its weakest? During transition. That even applies to businesses and governments. Its a undisputable general principle of existence! Transition means weakness and susceptibility.
If it takes millions of years for organisms to change nothing would have made it. Nothing!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
Takes more faith to believe that the ENTIRE universe as specifically ordered as it is just happened than to believe that a Creator created the heavens and the earth. In fact that kinda faith doesnt exist. It isnt faith. Its foolishness which is what most of evolution is.
There is only form of evolution which exists and can be observed and thats macro evolution which is just like things changing over time through inter breeding and environmental adaptations. Cosmic, Macro, Chemical? Nope!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
Id also like to point out that there are drawing all over the planet of what looks like anything from dinosaurs to aliens. I really dont think anything other than that can be said.
I believe God created the heavens and the earth but I do not believe the earth is 6000 years old any more than I believe catholicism to be a Christian religion.
If you read Sumerian texts or even the Book of Enoch youll find 5000 years ago people knew the earth was round. That information was lost like other things.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
hurrdurr they are fake because I say so [distinct absence of proof and substance to my claims]. You dont even provide proof.....
iamjacobnz 3 months ago
The best thing about this is that it was all proven to be a hoax! The doctor himself admitted to making them himself in order to attract tourists! Just do a simple google search of the Ica Stone Hoax... fun times
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Actually little dumb child? The Inca Stones were brought from Peru to Spain in the 17th century. The guy who carved images in stones DID NOT create these images he simply copied them.
So in other words he made FAKE COPIES of the ORIGINAL INCA STONES so he could open a museum and profit from it. Thus he didnt make them. He copied them!
How bout ya actually do some research instead of using google as a convenient stumbling block to youre already wavering intelligence.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
Comment removed
carlsm95 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Davemustang2600 First of all I love how you come right out and call me a little dumb child. A nice way of introducing yourself. I'm sure that he got his inspiration from somewhere, and not all the stones were forgeries, but the images of people riding on dinosaurs certainly aren't authentic, he admitted it himself. He did that to cause a stir. Don't you creationists have other pieces of "evidence" to cling to besides this pathetic lie?
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Evidence? Did you actually ask for evidence? Man you are an idiot. Okay look around dummy! The ENTIRE universe depends on ORDER and not just any order a very SPECIFIC ORDER. ORDER doesnt just happen. Everything in the universe speaks of a creator. You deny that creator because you feel diminished by His existence. Youre only diminished when you believe a lie.
Furthermore, Evolution has presented NO EVIDENCE! Not one shred! Missing link? DUDE! Theres MILLIONS of missing links!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@carlsm95
An evolutionists from Berkeley admitted in an interview that evolutions biggest weakness is that there isnt
a single example of ANYTHING turning into something else in the beloved fossil record. In other words, you have different species that evolved naturally in groups such as horses, zebras, donkeys, etc over time but there isnt ONE EXAMPLE of MICRO EVOLUTION which is ONE THING RISING FROM ANOTHER THING!
Why millions of missing links? Because micro evolution doesnt happen!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Micro evolution simply states that EVERYTHING came from the same matter. That basically we all came from amphibians and reptiles and BS such as that. Yet, there isnt a SINGLE EXAMPLE of these TRANSITIONARY stages of one species giving rise to a completely different species! The chromosomal difference between us and apes is what 3 percent? Big deal! The DNA difference is like 300 percent! That makes us as different from apes as you to a cherry tree.
Youre eating what ur being fed
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@Davemustang2600 Boyo, there goes another creationist. If i've argued with a creationist once i've done it a million times. Do you realize how old and recycled your arguments are? Do you think, in my experience of "interacting" with creationists, that I haven't heard all this before? You are ignorant if you dont know how tired and old your arguments are and how they have been refuted countless times."No transitional fossils" is sooooooo old. Also, learn to refrain from using ad hominem attacks.
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Dude ad hominem? lol What are youre a dumb catholic too? Ya just in love with 1500 year old Latin?
Heres some more ad hominem for ya! YOURE A MORON!
Youve never argued with me little infant.
You have nothing! Youre a subscriber to the idiocy of scientists who betray the very science they claim to live by! What is science little infant? What is it? The drive towards fundamentals TRUTHS of the universe! Whats the basis of ALL science little infant? OBSERVATION!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@carlsm95
In science the rule is IF IT CANNOT BE OBSERVED THEN IT CANNOT BE STUDIED! IF IT CANT BE STUDIED THEN NO HYPOTHESIS CAN OFFERED!
Only ONE SINGLE FORM of evolution has been observed! ONE! Can you count to one dummy? Hold up one finger! ONE! And that is MACRO Evolution. Chemical, organic, cosmic, etc NEVER BEEN OBSERVED! Not even from digging around in the earth! ITS ALL CONJECTURE!
Evolution is more science fiction than Star Wars!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@carlsm95
What has BEEN OBSERVED infant!?
ORGANISMS THAT EXISTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES THROUGHOUT THE EARTHS AGE!
THATS IT! Theres not ONE SINGLE organism we can OBSERVER CHANGING into another!
Why? BECAUSE THEY WERE CREATED LIKE THAT MORON!
Look fool? Again, you have nothing. Im more intelligent than you. Im more thoroughly studied than you.
Youre no more than a lost echo who doesnt know what to do when its over chorused by an actual VOICE!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@Davemustang2600 BOORRINNGG!!! Same old recycled crock Ive heard before. For the love of GOD, give me something GROUND-BREAKING for once, something interesting that will leave me baffled and speechless. Something I havent already seen and hasn't already been refuted a million times. Same old recycled arguments ("no transitional forms!!!" "Macroevolution cant be observed!!!") and finally, same old insults (ad hominem) Also you totally messed up one of your arguments.Youre boring me to death here!
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Listen to me you half baked bloviating numb skulled king of idiots and footstool of fools!
You havent said one single shred of information. Not one!
So you get to shut up. Got it? All you've proven is that youre more unlearned and less worthy to speak on issues like this than these poor ignorant religious freaks you hate so much.
People like you man are classic! You go around the world and circle the bushes to say NOTHING!!!
Guess nothing yields nothing. Youre a O.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Tell ya what dummy?
Why dont you bring all of us poor deluded creationists proof contradicting what the TOP scientists in evolutions have already admitted! Do you know more than these guys? Heck man. I dont think youre IQ gets out of the 80s! Youre circular reasoning and dumb bell thinking proves it!
Bring me an example of the millions of transition stages of an amphibian evolving into a reptile?
Oh, you cant! Hmmm. Now why is that? BECAUSE IT DIDNT HAPPEN!~ MORON!
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
Comment removed
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Explain to all of us how DNA changes? Tell me doofas! Why cant humans breed with apes? Why cant dogs breed with cats? Because of barriers in DNA! The very tenets of evolution are illogical and summarily comical. Do you know how much DNA information is present in a rat? Who wrote the DNA codes? Who said which DNA codes work producing what life forms? Can DNA evolve? NO! in over 40 years weve known about DNA every test proves it cannot replicate anything other than its source code.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@carlsm95
In other words Chumlee, DNA has to be written like a computer program. It cannot change and it cannot evolve. As far as cells go mutation is ALWAYS unfavorable. Its what we call cancer! When you begin to look at chemical reaction and their basis in biological systems the more and more evolution unravels like a badly woven cheap sweater. All evolution has is in the rocks. It begins and ends there. Because when you look inside the bodies of life forms nothing bears out.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@Davemustang2600 truth is i dont have the time or energy to argue with you when i know what the end result will be.... your constant stream of insults is very off-putting and your arguments are very unoriginal... i will not type the same response for the millionth time. Goodbye.
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
By the way dummy.
My comments? Are from my own personal research. My own time. My own money. My own mind.
Im a voice. Youre an echo. Now fade away.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Davemustang2600
"Birds are mammals", quote from Davemoron2600
Birds are birds NOT mammals LOL
PERFECT EXAMPLE OF Davethemoron26000s research LOLOL
sykeo123 3 months ago
@Davemustang2600 My final message to you: If you were an actual, honest, sincere truth seeker, you would do genuine research on your own instead of trolling Youtube and provoking others. Your comments show that you have no true knowledge of the subject at all, except for what you want to believe is true. Your immaturity is best displayed in your constant insults which are totally irrelevant to the topic at hand. As a decent person I need not interact with people like you. Good-bye.
carlsm95 3 months ago
@carlsm95
Little child mind. The TRUTH is YOU CANT RESPOND! You lack the intelligence. You lack the information.
Youre a pathetic follower of a religion as ridiculous as mormonism.
Arguments do no require originality. They require rationality. Of which you have neither.
Now disappear back into the primordial abyss of your dark mind of shadows and caves and spears and 10 percent complete partial skeletons.
People like you live in the dirt because you cant handle the fresh air.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
@Davemustang2600 It's usually the people that resort to immature name calling that lack the evidence and intelligence. The Bible is a history book that you can't refute. Wake up to the truth. Stop denying it because of self pride.
krazykyle56 1 month ago
@krazykyle56 Your history book says there was a global flood but there is no geologic evidece for it. The bible is wrong again.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz bro, fish fossils in deserts, mountains, other strange places where there's no water?
R0gyo 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
@R0gyo The fish lived in shallow oceans and then the land is raised up over millions of years. Plate tectonics was proven in the 1950's A global flood was proven wrong 200 years ago.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz how was it proven wrong?
DuctTapeDerek0 6 days ago
@carlsm95 WELL SAID!
InTheirImage7 2 months ago
I'd imagine that if you're going to base your beliefs off Incan artifacts then I'd probably guess that whatever religion the Incan's had is also yours.
Zoofiend 3 months ago
The whole things a hoax.
Cainkane1 4 months ago
@Cainkane1
Lol youre not intelligent enough to call it a hoax. You call it a hoax for the same reason people choose evolution as science and not the absent of religion which is essentially a religion itself being based and formed wholly around religion to begin with.
Whether or not dinosaurs coexisted with man is irrelevant. Unimportant! Its a non issue!
The specificity of the origins of life do not hinge on what species existed together but where these species came from.
Davemustang2600 3 months ago
Comment removed
Skimbles2000 4 months ago
These have already been shown to be fakes -but not all of them.The culprit was not a theist nut just someone who wanted money.
stratocaster539 6 months ago
The stones also depict planes and other modern technology. The Ica area where they were supposedly found has a history of 100-800CE. Clearly the stones are modern fakes. The overwhelming archaeological facts prove that dinosaurs did not exist at that time. If you think dinosaurs lived 2,000 years ago, in the time of Jesus, you have rocks in your head.
imagineN0religion 6 months ago
@imagineN0religion Here's an exerpt from an article by Dennis L. Swift, who went to Peru and saw the stones first hand. "However, the stone, of high density, smooth andesite (a volcanic rock), has several areas deeply encrusted with desert sand, especially covering some of the engraved areas showing leaves. It has a film of oxidation over it, and the segment of T. rex's lower leg and foot are well worn. The fact that the therapod is not a good representation of T. rex (the front legs are too...
Skimbles2000 4 months ago
@imagineN0religion ...long) is further evidence against a modern forgery. The frill-like treatment along the back suggests the artist may have been drawing something like Spinosaurus." There are no "archaeological facts" that dinosaurs didn't live back then besides dating methods that are inaccurate. There are also other depictions of dinosaurs many other places, such as Roman mosaics, if you would consider that a more trustable source, but then again, you won't. I can't make the blind see.
Skimbles2000 4 months ago
@Skimbles2000
thanks for the reply. Yeah, dont waste your time on me - there are for more gullible people in the world.
imagineN0religion 4 months ago
@imagineN0religion I suggest you get over the fact that you're wrong, stop imagining, and start looking into Christainity. God would love to have you. It's eternity we're talking about here.
Skimbles2000 4 months ago
@Skimbles2000
my comments have nothing to do with religion, but if you must know I have done a great deal of study into christianity and was involved for about 8 years. Your faith is your personal choice. I wish you all the best with it but dont confuse it with knowledge. If you read widley enough and not just creationst literature you may come to an alternative conclusion on the dinosaur engravings and the history of the earth.
imagineN0religion 4 months ago
Why is this some big revelation? We knew about these stones a long time ago. Some people just denied/deny/will deny it, because it doesn't fit their versions of our past reality. Their paradigm won't allow it. Their "Matrix" won't allow it. Also, we know that our ancestors purposly destroyed the invaded' civilisation/culture/history to "erase their past" instill their futur. He who controls the past controls the futur. Maybe both are true.............boo!
MrLovESouls 6 months ago
@MrLovESouls its future with an e! fucking idiot!
o0zeroeffect0o 4 months ago
@o0zeroeffect0o LOL.....thanks for the correction..... asshole!
MrLovESouls 4 months ago
awesome i think there is more to human history than we think we know and we have been around much longer than we think.
FixedByDoc 6 months ago
1billion1deaths1 You sound like a man who really knows his drugs!
Your explanation of how the Inca's traveled time was very entertaining. Explains how they traveled into the 21st century, lifted these phony rocks at a local tourist shop, and took 'em back to show their friends!
Whatever you're smokin' it's gotta be premium quality!
SpaceOdyssey56 6 months ago
The inca's traveld threw hyper dimension with potions and rituals that involved death and supernatural metaphysical beings of instant space time portation travel. They could travel back and fourth into the future & past, any place time or day of excistence. Disappeared sucked into the earth by the physical&mental law.
1billion1deaths1 7 months ago
@:05 The only dinosaur with plates on it's back had a really small head, this is not a real dinosaur.
gregrutz 7 months ago
These stylized drawings on stone are of modern origin. They're made the ton down in South America and sold to tourists! Try again, bozos!
SpaceOdyssey56 7 months ago
@SpaceOdyssey56 yea right atheist extremist.
1billion1deaths1 6 months ago
They drew what they saw, poor evolutionist, more evidence against them. Men and dinos lived together.
xchris1800 7 months ago
@xchris1800 It makes no difference to Evolution.
stratocaster539 6 months ago
See how much more is out there when you do psychedelics, the governments of today are keeping us from seeing the rest of the world's in our heads/universe.
hawaiiguykailua 7 months ago
Comment removed
illusion5444 7 months ago
Comment removed
ChromeDove 8 months ago
@ChromeDove .....no, go on...tell us what you were gonna say
justtrollingalong 8 months ago
känguruhs at 1.57 ?
on inka stones ?
destructOzap 8 months ago
@destructOzap sorry,went from german to english
destructOzap 8 months ago
those werent made by the incas theure ICA stones, epic fail on that
Leozerolunaedge 8 months ago
they all look like Denver the last dinosaur.
they're too cartoonish...i don't buy it.
Picsie 9 months ago
interesting, but you can never differentiate what's real from what's fake these days.
romanianskill 9 months ago
@romanianskill They are all fake. Dinosaurs died of 65 Million years ago except the small ones with feathers.
gregrutz 7 months ago
Freshly scratched onto the stone.
davewatcher 10 months ago
holy shit, the inca loved the cock 1:40, they were the original village people
mynamesrickjames 10 months ago
pero no me digas una cosa asi muchacho!!!
mynamesrickjames 10 months ago
En 1975 J. J. Benítez escribió el libro "Existió otra Humanidad", hay indicios por todo el mundo sobre que pudo haber existido una gran civizacion , que huvo vida inteligente es este planeta mucho mas antes que nosotros y que por razones desconocidas ellos desaparecieron
Eldocchikana 11 months ago
OMG they were so advanced..Gay blowjob scene at 1:40!! Inca chopping a dick for suvenir at 2:20??) WTF????????? HAHAHAHAHA
NEVALOVE 11 months ago
@NEVALOVE Not Inca, this is lost civilization. Its miracle, that this civilization is so advanced. Everything came in 100 years, before that there werent any tvs, cars, phones...
JamesBondfan89 11 months ago
@NEVALOVE gback and sit on yer dildo
thoostorm4 10 months ago
@thoostorm4 I CAN'T!! , cause your momma stole it from me, instead of buying a new one from the store... she's a nasty pig... just like you, and you're the result of her slutty trailer trash whoreness behavior...
Go f@ck your cat you loser, at least you'll have a pussy to brag about... Nice to meet you too asshole... LOL
NEVALOVE 10 months ago
@NEVALOVE you nasty phukface
thoostorm4 10 months ago
@NEVALOVE lose yerdildo????????
thoostorm4 6 months ago
@thoostorm4 YES! Tell your momma not to steal from me again! Can't believe she stole my dildo... after I just use it... lol
NEVALOVE 3 months ago
FAKE! google Ica stones wiki
justinbrayshaw 1 year ago
@justinbrayshaw In 1973 Uschuya confirmed that he had forged the stones during an interview with Erich von Däniken, copying the images from comic books, text books and magazines but later recanted that claim during an interview with a German journalist, saying that he had claimed they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological artifacts.
JamesBondfan89 1 year ago
Comment removed
illusion5444 7 months ago
it's not the secret of the incas, it's way to old to be of the Incan civilization
xXDominoXx 1 year ago
put the h....t...t...p at the start
thehaleo 1 year ago
@thehaleo aha ok thx dude :)
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Palaeofiles/Frauds/reconstruction.htm
thehaleo 1 year ago
In fact, I just saw some videos here in youtube regarding OOPARTs. So you can get a small example of some there.
vme1111 1 year ago
There is countless amounts of evidence proving just about everything we`ve been taught is a lie. They are so call "out of place artifacts". Because they conflict with current beliefs they aren`t made public, or are considered a hoax without evidence of such, or simply ignored and hidden. Not all having to do with religion either. Just things like who really discovered what first, Neanderthals having bullet holes in their skulls, human footprints found in the same rock as dinosaurs. Just a few.
vme1111 1 year ago 3
@vme1111 ....i honestly dont think that thousands of scientists have got it so wrong or are apart of some giant conspiracy. all it would take is for some reputable scientist to blow the whistle and the whole thing would be exposed. no..these carvings have already been proven to be a hoax, the makers of them have admitted it and the point ive made is that the dinos have been miss- drawn in a trend that we did up untill just recently....these are facts.
thehaleo 1 year ago
@thehaleo Well did you hear about the reason and story why they "confessed"? Besides, even if these are hoaxes, there`s still tons of more evidence making the same statement that aren`t disclosed.
vme1111 1 year ago
Do further research on this and you`ll see these aren`t fake. Just another example of suppressed knowledge.
vme1111 1 year ago
@vme1111 ...too late...ive already proved it...
thehaleo 1 year ago
ok...for some reason it wont take....google 'reconstruction errors' and look for the one done by the bristol university..
thehaleo 1 year ago
@thehaleo ok. thx
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
@thehaleo Ehm I don't find it :S
send the link but remove the dots and write (dot) instead, then it works.
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
lol, dino breast feeding
Blackmailman 1 year ago
@:07 That has to be hard on the ... you know.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@sicario1919 That's nice, but no man alive today is 5500 years old and can verify the age. Always take dates with a grain of salt. Some are based on erroneous data and methods, others I believe are fabricated to discredit the Bible in the minds of the multitude. How did they come up with that figure?
joroma77 1 year ago
@joroma77 Trees are 7000 years old.
gregrutz 1 year ago
the bible is so right
Morenob 1 year ago
@Morenob Isaiah 40 : 22-24
“He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers.”
I can draw a circle on a flat piece of paper, they are 2D. FLAT.
Galileo proved the bible wrong too.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz Galileo did not prove the bible wrong...
R0gyo 3 weeks ago
A LOT OF THESE CREATURES HAVE BEEN HIDDEN, JUST LIKE THE FIRE BREATHING DRAGON "LEVIATHAN' THAT THE LORD HAS HIDDEN FOR THE DAY OF PAY BACK IN THE LAST DAYS. HE 'S GONNA BE LOOSE SOON, JUST WATCH!! SHALAM
Tazaraw 1 year ago
I was never told about this stuff in school. I wonder why?
rudge1982 1 year ago
to add more....it was also a common misconception that two legged dinosaurs stood up right. they didnt. but they are drawn this way in the carvings. if man had seen dinosaurs they wouldnt have made the same misake in drawing them because the backs ware flat with the tail counter weighing the head and would have been drawn as suck...
thehaleo 1 year ago
@thehaleo How can you draw the conclusion that two-legged dinosaurs weren't able to stand upright? Oh yeah, you read it in a magazine. As a rule archaelogists find fragments of dinosaurs (they found a "graveyard" of dinosaur bones though, the skeleton parts were scrambled all over the place). There are animals today that lean forward as they run, but stand upright while still, and vice versa. Also, dinosaurs before the Flood lived under other conditions, they were stronger = straighter tails.
joroma77 1 year ago
@joroma77 Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.
What flood?
gregrutz 1 year ago
@joroma77 ....incorrect. it is common knowledge now that the spacing between the vertibrae wont allow it. up untill the 80's dino skeletons were assembled with the tails flowing along the ground (as is with these carvings). this left too large a gap in the backbone at the point where the tail angles out to follow the ground. prehaps you should do more reading yourself then you would know this.....
thehaleo 1 year ago
@joroma77 cont:...so when this discovery was made, all the skeletons were taken down and re-assembled following the exact spacing between the vertibrae. this left the tails high in the air acting as counterweights. these carvings, it could be forgiven for one or two to be drawn in the same mistake but for all of them?...lol....come on...
thehaleo 1 year ago
Comment removed
thehaleo 1 year ago
ok...the tails on nearly all act as a counterweight for the head and necks. with early skeletons not being assembled properly, it was assumed that the tails were close to the ground. they were not.my reference to ray was that the dinosours he made in all his dino films were portrayed the same way as were books up untill just recently. so are the carvings in this video. the backbones were more or less straight because the tails were high in the air. these carvings are copyed from early books...
thehaleo 1 year ago
On these stones the sauropods are depicted as mammals. The structure of a triceratops is that of a mammal. These shouldn't be called "dinosaurs"; they aren't lizards!
joroma77 1 year ago
these are fake. the dinosaurs have been drawn in ray harryhausen style. its only in recent years weve found out that the backbones were more or less straight....this would mean the dinosaurs have a very different image....
thehaleo 1 year ago
@thehaleo Do tell us how the backbones could be straight with such a long heavy tail and a big belly that needed space...
joroma77 1 year ago
@thehaleo I checked out Ray Harryhausen's work and it looks nothing like these depictions. He made animated man skeletons, snakes/lizards with human head or men with lizard heads. True, some of his creatures looked like regular dinosaurs, but so did the exhibits in museums of his day. He just had to copy them. What's funny is that most of his dinosaur models had straight backs!
joroma77 1 year ago
@thehaleo not all of them
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
@eagleeye2102 ....and the ones you are refering to....do they have dinosaurs carved on them?
thehaleo 1 year ago
@thehaleo yes. Some of these Dinosaurs have circles on them. Nobody knew that Dinosaurs had circles on their skin untill Dinosaurskin was found. Maybe the Dinosaur stones which doesn't have cirlces on the Dinosaurs are hoax.
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
@thehaleo ....i dont think you understand the point i am trying to make. read over my prievious posts- it might give you a bit of a clue..