Wikipedia is a good source of info for anyone that doesn't care about getting things completely accurate or who are lazy. Sure some things are correct, but anyone can put anything on wiki. At uni we are told never to use wiki as a source of information and I agree. We actually get marked down for referencing wiki.
So many people use it as their only source of info, then argue if a more legit source says otherwise cause they think wiki is always accurate.
As with any reference of information for academic purposes,it should be crossed referenced to verify its validity. However, for casual, or even infotainment, wikapedia is a good source for people to pool communal knowledge.
I know if one of my students (undergrad psych) cites a Wikipedia reference in an APA paper I disallow the reference and give them the chance to remove the reference and replace it with something else. Once.
Wikipedia is very good for some things but you have to be careful. I would be a lot less trusting of anything I read on that site pertaining to any topic which is political in nature. I've found some entries to be not only incomplete but downright false in such cases.
As a prank I even went on and editted sumthin cuz my sis needed something for a project and i was pissed at her so i made her flunk the assignment cuz i knew she'd use wikipeidia!!! mwahahahaha
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during five and a half years by the German BND, which is the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100 videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. Markus Bott was assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears, the BND will have assassinated me as well.
I think Wiki is a good source, but you can't rely on it entirely.
I think that dismissing Wiki in advance is stupid. especially that people often do it because someone does refer to an information from Wiki when adding an good argument against them.
You need to remember that the information on Wiki are controlled by many professors, there are sources to most of the content, and falls information are quickly deleted (not all of them of course, you cant control everything).
Checking out the sources is cumbersome, but you can get to them and see by yourself if they are true or not.
Otherwise you don't have solid evidence to dismiss them.
And since in most of the cases the only reason someone does dismiss the information from wikipedia is because they don't fit his beliefs, and not because he is a expert on the subject (with an diploma), or even well informed, you need those hard evidence to prove you right.
And because most of the information in wikipedi are reliable (especially in bigger articles about less recent events on with the emotions had fallen, and with are not controversial).
The biggest problem is that informations can be exploited and manipulated (those from the sources), with is a problem of books (with some of you may think are 100% reliable), documentaries, and generally any media.
But then again, there are people controlling the quality of information on Wiki.
This is somewhat an advantage, the number of people creating wikipedia in the context of its quality of information.
Because the more people does it, the less the probability of some illegitimate information being published on wiki (at least for a long time, because you cant really avoid it entirely).
But there is also an big drawback with concerns most of the people questioning wiki. The fact that anyone can edit it.
But its not as much of a danger as everyone thinks.
Note how often articles are edited (not very often), and how quickly any falls information are removed (very quickly).
Also if any untrue information could stay on Wiki for longer it would have to be very well written and thought through with drastically limits the number of people that could do that.
The problem with wiki mentioned in HotForWords, about the etymology of words shows what happens when you dont have the full picture.
Wiki is not complete, and probably articles about origins of words are not very developed.
In one of the examples i seen, there where one of the possible origins out of 3 or 4, and it was not the most probable one (the one accepted among philologists).
And this is how Wiki works, someone knew only one and posted it, and thats why you need to be cautious relying solely on Wiki.
I admit that Wiki is not as credible and complete as an well known book, but it an valuable source.
then again you have a right to be jealous - every man who aint gay would love to fuck her ( and plenty of women also ) and then have a good conversation with her afterwards .
I doubt many men want to talk to you - let alone do the other.
once while on wikipedia, i don't remember what i was reading, but what i found looked as if it was typed by a four year old. i don't think i will be using wikipedia anymore. thanks for the vid. i used it for a school essay! oh crap.....
I wouldn't rely on it for sources. Its good to browse info when you're curious, but not always for 100% accurate info. Especially when a lot of their articles say things like things like "no sources for this article are available".
Its funny, but I was reading this one article that looked like it was typed by somebody in middle school...
Another parallel expresion is [LET THE CAT OUT OF THE BAG]. do you mean GULLIVER'S TRAVELS? I used to have these little cheap grocery store encyclopeidias Illustrated World which had short synopsises of the great literature at the end of each volume. I like my Encarta on my PC.
I respect that you stood up for yourself to whoever it was that said that of you. People in this country usually say bad things about those who they are intimidated by, and it really never says anything about the person who they are attempting to debunk, it usually says something about themselves, you will find. Afterall, there is nothing wrong with checking more than one source for information of any kind. How else could you crack the case? Good luck.
Wikipedia...it's okay. There are a lot of interesting things on there and for the most part, things are true. Every now and then, you might find an extreme false or two, I guess it depends on what your looking up. Oh well, it's all about personal preferences. :D (YAY, my homework's done!!!! LOL)
OK is short for okay, yes, but the sound 'okay' may originally come from the initials OK themselves, especially since the sound is so international. There are many different theories about there the abbreviation came for. A list can be found on wikipedia under 'list of proposed etymologies of OK'
I use Wikipedia when I am curious about someone or something. The Bios on Wiki are good. As for the other stuff, sure, it's informative enough to address my needs. But if I needed information for an academic piece I would not rely on it.
How do you know this crap? Where do you research this? Leave your research notes, this would definitely add to your reputation as a trusty source for facts.
жаль у меня такиx учителей очаровательныx не было )
А так, ну да постоянно юзаю, только обычно на мои вопросы всегда можно проверить эти ответы. Или надо искать еще в 3-4еx сурсаx. А доверять, да изредка доверяю.
Your fascination with words and languages is very refreshing. Do you have a simialr interest for accents? Can you speak english as an english person or an american?
I wish I had this show instead of sesame street when I was younger. Things would have been way different if big bird was a hot intelligent foreign girl. (sounds russian. but not knowing kind of adds to the intrigue.) None the less keep it up.
i love wikipedia because my teachers recommend us 2 use it. so if we get crap information from wikipedia and put it in a report i can blame on wikipedia
Yes, it is true that anyone can edit an article. But go find me a wiki that has random information such as your "Haha" in an article that shouldn't shouldn't belong there.
wikipedia is a good place to start if you have no idea about the subject/question that you are trying to research, but you still need to check a peer reviewed source after you've been steered in the right direction
I think wikepedia is pretty good but not if you want to do very in depth stuff like word or phrase origins. Its better to use for animals or games and stuff like that.
I think Wikipedia is useful and can be trusted in some areas... but not others. Usually, it is a trustable source of info that is usually available widely at other websites, but it becomes rather unreliable when it comes to information that is hardly found. Many a time I have found really bad errors in the information, and though I still use it, I would definitely not rely on it as my only source. I like to compare sources.
Wikipedia is reliable..i mean for the fact thaT it helped me do my worldwide currency track called libre solidi denari.. but it also has alot of b/s in it due to the goverment influence.. like the 9/11 and 7/7 bombings...yea anyway..the first explanation b4 yer sis spilled the beans was a bit more classy
Wikipedia is really good!!.. Of course Anyone can write anything, but then these are again validated and edited.. Yah! So lets not go crapping abt Wikipedia..! Anyone who disagrees have not used wiki then.
Watch Marina’s psychological portrait. Search:
“HotForWords Socionics”
Yaaroslav 5 months ago
wikipidia is the worst source for info.. you could get better info from a 2 year old
1997skaterboi 6 months ago
NO
thegamerkid246 10 months ago
Wikipedia is a good source of info for anyone that doesn't care about getting things completely accurate or who are lazy. Sure some things are correct, but anyone can put anything on wiki. At uni we are told never to use wiki as a source of information and I agree. We actually get marked down for referencing wiki.
So many people use it as their only source of info, then argue if a more legit source says otherwise cause they think wiki is always accurate.
Ragnarok187 1 year ago
As with any reference of information for academic purposes,it should be crossed referenced to verify its validity. However, for casual, or even infotainment, wikapedia is a good source for people to pool communal knowledge.
dominofate 1 year ago
The commercial that came on before this video told me to pee in the shower.......
JessBisme 1 year ago
can you piss on your sister?
zerdling 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO BODY CARES!
Imdobest 1 year ago
"spill" is game in Norwegian
heisenfeis 1 year ago
no cleavage >:(
xxxcountymusicxxx 1 year ago
Masons use the black and white marbles (beans) for voting...even today.it is used to approve or reject applicants..white for yes, black for no.
True.
Tom in Utica NY
telsport 1 year ago
1:23 +10
animep 1 year ago
дура
CorsairDATALUx 1 year ago
wikipedia says al ghore is born on mars
kinicksterhawk 1 year ago
And now we actually shorten that back to "Spill it," or even just "Spill."
trlkly 1 year ago
pause at 1:23
mustardman72 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks,
Chuyên cung cấp các loại gạch xây dựng:
Gạch block xây tường rào, gạch trồng cỏ, gạch terrazzo, gạch con sâu, gạch chữ I, gạch màu, gạch lục giác, gạch 3 lá, gạch bông, gạch lát vỉa hè, gạch lát sân - vườn, gạch lát nền, gạch tuynel, gạch xây, gạch ống, gạch đinh, gạch ốp tường, gạch trang trí,..
Vui lòng liên hệ:
- Mr. HẢI > Cellphone 0907531007
Công ty Phát Triển Việt Nam
- Địa chỉ: 54/17 Nguyễn Hồng Đào, P.14, Q.Tân Bình, TP.HCM
- Điện thoại: 08.39492682 - Fax: 08.39492683
gachviet 1 year ago
omg u r so hot
stiven999 1 year ago
NO!
BaphometRex666 1 year ago
I mean aren't I? And she's cute I guess...
blinksoad 1 year ago
Comment removed
blinksoad 1 year ago
To spill the beans is why information means misfortune in Latin: Hope you suffer more misfortune.
WOWJBEOWULF 1 year ago
You can't trust wikipedia especially when it should be wikipaedia (if you know the semantivs of the English language).
DieGLAZERDie 1 year ago
I'd love to spill my beans on ur face =p
XuBlax 1 year ago
Знакомый акцент)
thePmr 1 year ago
I know if one of my students (undergrad psych) cites a Wikipedia reference in an APA paper I disallow the reference and give them the chance to remove the reference and replace it with something else. Once.
meby2k 1 year ago
Your accent is shitty...
truedimebagdarrell 1 year ago
Wikipedia is very good for some things but you have to be careful. I would be a lot less trusting of anything I read on that site pertaining to any topic which is political in nature. I've found some entries to be not only incomplete but downright false in such cases.
hungarygator 1 year ago
¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ post to 3 other vids
¨°º¤ø„¸ Copy „ø¤º°¨ press F5 twice
¸„ø¤º°¨Paste ``°º¤ø„¸ OK
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º look at ur backgroud
bubba02009 1 year ago
no... wikipeidia is BAD!!!
As a prank I even went on and editted sumthin cuz my sis needed something for a project and i was pissed at her so i made her flunk the assignment cuz i knew she'd use wikipeidia!!! mwahahahaha
TaylurNikol001 1 year ago
nonsense
sigmaforte 1 year ago
I don't tink she actually has a sister, faker... ;-P
CatGameDaiyE 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during five and a half years by the German BND, which is the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100 videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. Markus Bott was assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears, the BND will have assassinated me as well.
Martin Bott
wwwtotalitaerde 1 year ago
I agree with jizzonyourass!! Six parts? really Serialkiller? You need to get laid bud!!
MegaGeoffry 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
asone . ru
wow server 3.2.2
x75 or x5
присоединяйтесь!
inigmos 2 years ago
wtf serialkiller really six parts, most people already know that shit... it doesnt really matter
jizzonyourass 2 years ago
I think Wiki is a good source, but you can't rely on it entirely.
I think that dismissing Wiki in advance is stupid. especially that people often do it because someone does refer to an information from Wiki when adding an good argument against them.
You need to remember that the information on Wiki are controlled by many professors, there are sources to most of the content, and falls information are quickly deleted (not all of them of course, you cant control everything).
PART1
serialkiller1990 2 years ago 2
PART2
Checking out the sources is cumbersome, but you can get to them and see by yourself if they are true or not.
Otherwise you don't have solid evidence to dismiss them.
And since in most of the cases the only reason someone does dismiss the information from wikipedia is because they don't fit his beliefs, and not because he is a expert on the subject (with an diploma), or even well informed, you need those hard evidence to prove you right.
serialkiller1990 2 years ago
PART3
And because most of the information in wikipedi are reliable (especially in bigger articles about less recent events on with the emotions had fallen, and with are not controversial).
The biggest problem is that informations can be exploited and manipulated (those from the sources), with is a problem of books (with some of you may think are 100% reliable), documentaries, and generally any media.
But then again, there are people controlling the quality of information on Wiki.
serialkiller1990 2 years ago
PART4
This is somewhat an advantage, the number of people creating wikipedia in the context of its quality of information.
Because the more people does it, the less the probability of some illegitimate information being published on wiki (at least for a long time, because you cant really avoid it entirely).
But there is also an big drawback with concerns most of the people questioning wiki. The fact that anyone can edit it.
But its not as much of a danger as everyone thinks.
serialkiller1990 2 years ago
PART5
Think about it.
Note how often articles are edited (not very often), and how quickly any falls information are removed (very quickly).
Also if any untrue information could stay on Wiki for longer it would have to be very well written and thought through with drastically limits the number of people that could do that.
The problem with wiki mentioned in HotForWords, about the etymology of words shows what happens when you dont have the full picture.
serialkiller1990 2 years ago
PART 6
Wiki is not complete, and probably articles about origins of words are not very developed.
In one of the examples i seen, there where one of the possible origins out of 3 or 4, and it was not the most probable one (the one accepted among philologists).
And this is how Wiki works, someone knew only one and posted it, and thats why you need to be cautious relying solely on Wiki.
I admit that Wiki is not as credible and complete as an well known book, but it an valuable source.
serialkiller1990 2 years ago
What the fuck stop commenting its just a fucken video.
mammalbruiser 2 years ago 2
Эта баба просто снимает видео о себе и потом читает комменты про свои большие сиски и жопу....
MrVasya74 2 years ago
Как же это блять тупо.......
Nipasha 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck her in mouth
Vaukskis 2 years ago
so tem peito gostoso.. mas do resto.. nada!!
apunike 2 years ago
i want to spill a load of bean juice on her
bigmike784 2 years ago
no wikipedia lies i wrote there some fake stuff during a project and one group accualy printed what i wrote and glued it to their project...
...and got an F
00000fulable 2 years ago
You have a sister!?
Plz email me with her number. Thanks!
WootNico 2 years ago 14
no its her just talking over the top
wonderman234 2 years ago
@WootNico Haha you're right .. me,too ;)
SamiHyypiae 2 years ago
she got some DSL for sure
exxent88 2 years ago
She is fine. her titties are not lopsided
lovethenew 2 years ago 2
Sorry honey but not only are your boobs lop-sided, so are your fricken lips:( SAD!!!
lafiora27 2 years ago
well wikipedia is an open source of information so i really don't know if you can trust it or not.....
but if you don't find anything else i guess you can but it should be your last choice.
now put me in your next vid! :]
Stilllookingforacure 2 years ago
you sure know how to make guys interested in science
gedaxx 2 years ago
hahahhaha im not american smart ass
alicekool 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At least she know to languages , you stupid Ameican SLUT !
Mishik77 2 years ago
learn english!!
russian whore:)
alicekool 2 years ago
At least she knows two languages , you American slut !!
Mishik77 2 years ago
no she doesnt.....that wasnt english.....and russian girls ARE whores....so idk y yu gettin so pissy....pfft....idiot
XxXmizzshottaXxX 2 years ago
that wouldnt be jealousy your spouting would it -
then again you have a right to be jealous - every man who aint gay would love to fuck her ( and plenty of women also ) and then have a good conversation with her afterwards .
I doubt many men want to talk to you - let alone do the other.
chisacat 2 years ago
Haha you are the cutest :)))
makuuz 2 years ago
man wazz up wit all these haters wit no life wat so ever if u hate da vid y did u klik it biatches shes perfect smart and fukin hot
MrMcthundar 2 years ago
To look shit up on the internet doesn't take brains. I have serious doubts as to whether she really is intelligent but you never do know.
The only reason anybody takes her seriously is because she is "hot".
Joppsta360 2 years ago
GOAT_HEAD(go-ahead) and the beans were read by candelite and cow-peas...its true---please tell on me, hea-hea...goathead soup and the cow peas(piss)
thawthepast 2 years ago
also black and white stones
jpWW2fighter42 2 years ago
Depending on the topic wikipedia can be appropriate or not
carlbot2000 2 years ago
i want to see you in a porno soo bad lol
a7x22261 2 years ago
i want you to see me in a porno doing her soo bad roflmfao
Stickletickle 2 years ago 2
wtf i came to see pissed off sis
watarball 2 years ago 3
how about i spill my cun all over your tittys
thechopper3 2 years ago
way to spell fool
SnedorKeeb08 2 years ago 3
I dont understand what she is saying but i would jizz on her face
placer007 2 years ago
you'd probly jizz in your pants when you approached her
SnedorKeeb08 2 years ago 3
um, i use it sumtimes, wen i cant be bohtered to open a book lol
xXasianmistressXx 2 years ago
U should not use wiki.I made an account and made retarted answers . Ps she's smokin hot
shotshelf 2 years ago
I don't use Wikipedia much.
I do it old fashion(that sounds weird),
I use encyclopedias(ah much better).
gamertooth17 2 years ago
once while on wikipedia, i don't remember what i was reading, but what i found looked as if it was typed by a four year old. i don't think i will be using wikipedia anymore. thanks for the vid. i used it for a school essay! oh crap.....
TayzieIsANarutoNerd 2 years ago
smart and beautiful
world needs more of u!
PGZ4sheezy 2 years ago 22
@PGZ4sheezy Lol @ smart.
blinksoad 1 year ago
its a pretyy good source of information...
MagyarRockerHonved 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch transformers in HD on Watchnewtransformers . com
New tr@nsformers Watchnewtransformers * com
full transformers movie is on watchnewtransformers(. com
transformes 2 dvd on WatchNewTransformers *-c0m
oceandept1551 2 years ago
I bet your sis is way fu*kin better than you, if u wana contradict me, show her :D
LgGerminator 2 years ago
Wikipedia is run by moderators.
If someone stupid writes something, they can delete it in a second.
TheWarrior816 2 years ago 2
actually wikipedia has been proven to be more accurate than actual encyclopedias
yoyodude7407 2 years ago 2
I wouldn't rely on it for sources. Its good to browse info when you're curious, but not always for 100% accurate info. Especially when a lot of their articles say things like things like "no sources for this article are available".
Its funny, but I was reading this one article that looked like it was typed by somebody in middle school...
juniorxx2 2 years ago
She pronounces the W a V
it's cute :)
KawtherKaram 2 years ago
Another parallel expresion is [LET THE CAT OUT OF THE BAG]. do you mean GULLIVER'S TRAVELS? I used to have these little cheap grocery store encyclopeidias Illustrated World which had short synopsises of the great literature at the end of each volume. I like my Encarta on my PC.
Big5XL 2 years ago
the way u talk annoys me.. =s
candyyycanesz 2 years ago
your sister has the same accent as you
gidosmart 2 years ago
But you still didnt explained why they use the word 'beans' and not 'grain' or blood' for example!
JumpingTomato 2 years ago
I respect that you stood up for yourself to whoever it was that said that of you. People in this country usually say bad things about those who they are intimidated by, and it really never says anything about the person who they are attempting to debunk, it usually says something about themselves, you will find. Afterall, there is nothing wrong with checking more than one source for information of any kind. How else could you crack the case? Good luck.
thayne116 2 years ago
can i spill some beans on those tits
TheLippers4 2 years ago
lol
ILovePencilTricks 2 years ago
Can I spill some beans on your tummy?
MikeHuntagape 2 years ago
i like you ! :)
dsmittyxo 2 years ago
Yes and no.
Harley2019 2 years ago
you talk funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xD no offence
Polaczek1995 2 years ago
she talks "funny" because she i from russia. and nobody cares, we only listen to what her boobs say...
hiitsmcjosh 2 years ago 2
Wikipedia...it's okay. There are a lot of interesting things on there and for the most part, things are true. Every now and then, you might find an extreme false or two, I guess it depends on what your looking up. Oh well, it's all about personal preferences. :D (YAY, my homework's done!!!! LOL)
gsotost 2 years ago
Anything that isn't legitimate on Wikipedia gets deleted very fast.
leccah 2 years ago 2
It told me the first americans were marshmallow men...
boredman443 2 years ago 2
she said Vikipedia! what r u? a russian? a pole?
ohoooh3ad 2 years ago
HELL NO!!!!!
Wikipedia is allmost always wrong ]-P.
213141awesome 2 years ago
yeh it pwns rofl, marry mee, ur sister is hawt i rekon
glnvmgf 2 years ago
Hey hotforwords. Can you look up what the phrase O.K. means? What does the O and the K stand for?
zuppup1 2 years ago
O.K. Is ust short for "Okay" The actual word haha just letting you know.
supercat122 2 years ago
umm.. okay actually is just a misspelling of OK. im pretty sure when you say O.K. its the actual letters... that only makes sense..
zuppup1 2 years ago
I would have thought it was a derivative of mediocre.. but only marina knows the truth :p
kweheri 2 years ago
OK is short for okay, yes, but the sound 'okay' may originally come from the initials OK themselves, especially since the sound is so international. There are many different theories about there the abbreviation came for. A list can be found on wikipedia under 'list of proposed etymologies of OK'
PaddyTV 2 years ago
thanks :)
zuppup1 2 years ago
Wikipedia's OK.
A very reliable way to receive information is through my penis. You should try it sometime.
perspicacity89 2 years ago
Wiki? Yes
Artcarnie 2 years ago
we had a lexika test in germany and wikipedia won
schroedingersdrache 2 years ago
I like to use it for getting some info on something, then googling it to learn more.
TheRealShadoninja 2 years ago
I use Wikipedia when I am curious about someone or something. The Bios on Wiki are good. As for the other stuff, sure, it's informative enough to address my needs. But if I needed information for an academic piece I would not rely on it.
So, yeah, I love Wiki.
namashivaya36 2 years ago
Sent me your sister. HaHaHaHa. Is she as fine as you are ?
hockpooh777 3 years ago
she's full of shit and obsessed with guns. sick bitch.
h0tf0rw0rd515a5lut 3 years ago
1:05 lol X_X
anthonzi 3 years ago
this is gay
thugprincess523 3 years ago
all i no is everything i ave seen there checks out, XCEPT 1 thing, so i will say 75% pf the time
crakhoBITCH 3 years ago
crack-a-pedia is a horrible source
dezzy0 3 years ago
How do you know this crap? Where do you research this? Leave your research notes, this would definitely add to your reputation as a trusty source for facts.
anmpir 3 years ago
you can't use Wikipedia as an academic source for any academic work.
you can only use it for reference and to forward you to scientific or academic approved articles.
LtDanw 3 years ago
u guys shudent fight its not good and ur both fucking hot as hell so u should both team u and do it together INSTEAD OF FIGHTNG
nghtyby12 3 years ago
жаль у меня такиx учителей очаровательныx не было )
А так, ну да постоянно юзаю, только обычно на мои вопросы всегда можно проверить эти ответы. Или надо искать еще в 3-4еx сурсаx. А доверять, да изредка доверяю.
DEMlGOD 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
She uses wikipedia? There goes her credibility
hfl2005 3 years ago
I thought it was obvious that she is making a joke and that saying that her source isn't from wiki.
cwingnam 3 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
watch my videos meaculpa7
meaculpa7 3 years ago
i want your body damn your fine
KCCHAOS666 3 years ago
yes, sometimes wickipedia is kinda good. Years in another hand may not always be true.
xx Cajsa
cajsalindahl 3 years ago
Wikipedia has a reputation for not being accurate. However, sometimes I use it as a quick source of information.
A1l2l2e2n4 3 years ago
can't resist. too cute. *-*
i want a hug. (L)
fehgoingmad 3 years ago
Thank you for pointing out that you can't trust wiki all the time!
nicehotshower 3 years ago 4
Man. You're sister is a real bitch!
gsnaples 3 years ago
There is no sister. It's her too duh!
LimitedCry 3 years ago 3
uh,if one associates the phrase pissed off with water sports or urination sports does that mean serious mental problems?
BONEDOMEZ 3 years ago
Hello, I'm an internet tough guy.
Sori026 3 years ago
^^LMFAO
1Noa1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she is so hot!
D6825 3 years ago
Do you actually have a sister? Because I'm pretty sure by now that you don't.
TheMajesticOne1 3 years ago 2
Wikipedia is useful if you take the info from it with a grain of salt.
goodyfun 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG.. Du U Swallow.. ¿? :)
.-.-.
vk4akp 3 years ago
wikipedia sucksssssssssss just google stuff also what kind of accent is that i <3 it :D
xSyNdiCaT3v 3 years ago
Your fascination with words and languages is very refreshing. Do you have a simialr interest for accents? Can you speak english as an english person or an american?
Sig
:)
Sigkim 3 years ago
I wish I had this show instead of sesame street when I was younger. Things would have been way different if big bird was a hot intelligent foreign girl. (sounds russian. but not knowing kind of adds to the intrigue.) None the less keep it up.
thatssensational 3 years ago
ummmmmm love ur accent
jicnpt 3 years ago
er what? gullible's travels? you mean gulliver's?
raebaby93 3 years ago
omg you can't say pissed.
TweekDash 3 years ago
Curious thing about "piss" and "pissed".
"Piss" appears twice in the King James Version of the Bible, once as a noun and once as a verb. "Pissed" can mean "drunk" in the United Kingdom;
"pissed" or "pissed off" can mean "upset" in the U.S. That's obviously how Marina is using it.
A1l2l2e2n4 3 years ago
i love wikipedia because my teachers recommend us 2 use it. so if we get crap information from wikipedia and put it in a report i can blame on wikipedia
randommfilms 3 years ago
u do know wikipedia is a edit page too. anyone can edit it. like in an article about cherries you could put HAHA.
CHeightsSchool 3 years ago
Yes, it is true that anyone can edit an article. But go find me a wiki that has random information such as your "Haha" in an article that shouldn't shouldn't belong there.
The articles are moderated and referenced.
ugotWTFP00NED 3 years ago
wtevr
CHeightsSchool 3 years ago
It would be funny if the voice they use for her sister had a ny accent instead of russian
hfl2005 3 years ago
is she a russian?just curious cuz her accent...anyway
gheale 3 years ago 2
yes, she's from nizhni novograd
shanetheutubster 3 years ago
your sister needs to get her ass kicked!
rickb731 3 years ago 2
Hey hotforwords, can you please tell me what the origon of "as easy as pie" is?
jens5465 3 years ago
Wikipedia? Umm... Maybe not the best.
OhMyFlipFlops 3 years ago
u r nasted and we know what spilled the beans is and yeah whatever
charlijeanjohnson 3 years ago
I LOVE YOU!!! WOOOOOOOH!
SpeedDemon661 3 years ago
wikipedia is a good place to start if you have no idea about the subject/question that you are trying to research, but you still need to check a peer reviewed source after you've been steered in the right direction
markzanewick 3 years ago
"You deserve it."
dam. your sis is a bitch
o.O
balltavorb 3 years ago
I think wikepedia is pretty good but not if you want to do very in depth stuff like word or phrase origins. Its better to use for animals or games and stuff like that.
Gunz997 3 years ago
where does "raging hardon" come from?
YOU thats where!
rickb731 3 years ago
Wikipedia is a good source for starting, but knowing that you really need to dig deeper to get more intel
willymessenger 3 years ago
i think it is a good suroce.
haliodlover 3 years ago 3
Gullible's travels? or Gulliver's Travels? is there a gullible's travels?
Cheengow 3 years ago
That was a play on words, I think.
tak178 3 years ago
YES!
AZN5Buffet 3 years ago
Wikipedia is not to good for information it is bad for that
Hex0xeH 3 years ago
Wikipedia seems to be a very reliable source of information - but then I may be too Gullible!
ProgressiveParty 3 years ago
I think Wikipedia is useful and can be trusted in some areas... but not others. Usually, it is a trustable source of info that is usually available widely at other websites, but it becomes rather unreliable when it comes to information that is hardly found. Many a time I have found really bad errors in the information, and though I still use it, I would definitely not rely on it as my only source. I like to compare sources.
JayashriV 3 years ago
Wikipedia is reliable..i mean for the fact thaT it helped me do my worldwide currency track called libre solidi denari.. but it also has alot of b/s in it due to the goverment influence.. like the 9/11 and 7/7 bombings...yea anyway..the first explanation b4 yer sis spilled the beans was a bit more classy
ThePrimary 3 years ago
At one time I used wikipedia a lot then I started to see just too many errors and no longer use or recommend it in the classes I teach.
Elaphae 3 years ago
Wikipedia is really good!!.. Of course Anyone can write anything, but then these are again validated and edited.. Yah! So lets not go crapping abt Wikipedia..! Anyone who disagrees have not used wiki then.
abishekn 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
wikipedia sucks
Punkanr 3 years ago