Sloooowwwwesssttt Unloading Ever

[davidsquall351]

"Slow a Fuck"...lol

I want one of those.

[GutpileCharlie]

A rather silly video.

Doesn't make shooters and gun owners look good.

[TheRobertloyd]

this fool woulda died in ww2

[SuperRevolvingdoor]

I just use it for russian roulette. works fine for me.

[drumminshooter]

Well, you would have survived on a civil war battle field...

[The1FastGP]

You fail, off to Siberia with you!!!

[jkitsunej]

Lol, just remember, slow is smooth and smooth is fast.

[outskool100]

WHEN HE WAS IN WAR HE WAS NOW DEAD

[LRooster4Prez]

slow and ugly to boot

[trunphin]

Boy, in a defense situation you'd be fuuuuuuuuucked

[bpowersman5000]

In a defense situation on the battle field if you have to use your pistol over your rifle you are pretty fucked anyway. Its not like you use your pistol all the time you know.

[Buffalowdown]

Where was the reloading in this reloading video?? haha

[beilei]

Yea.. I too just saw the unloading... =(

[CSSstravag]

27 seconds just on the extraction phase of the reload. Ouch. Then again, this was a weapon 'final act of defiance' basically, and it was designed back when swing-out cylinders were not all that popular.

Helluva gun, helluva piece of history, though. Keep 'em coming!

[melkor1861]

That's how most single-action revolvers are reloading, even nowadays. Go pick up a brand new Ruger Single Action revolver, and you have the same basic casing ejector. They are designed like that for reliability, durability, and accuracy, not for speediness.

[slowednthrowed420]

if i had a single action that would be fine but i would rather have a double action

[aphsknight74]

I prefer a good old fashioned Mk.23.lol

[82abnoff]

In the 'heat of battle' a 1911 always worked for me.

[Buffalowdown]

@82abnoff

1911 is a nice gun, but size, weight, and capacity are way to important to me in a carry pistol.

[lambda55]

It seems like having to do that in the heat of battle would be hard. I guess the Russians didn't think of moving the revolver out of the weapon...

[1cme1]

*cough* uhhh you mean the cylinder.

[Otacon237]

Not the Russians, the Belgians. Leon Nagant was a Belgian designer. He invented the pistol which the Russians (and other countries) adopted, and him and Mosin teamed up to make the Mosin-Nagant rifle.

[armohomi3]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzz...zzzzzzzzzzzzz...zzzz­zzzzz is he dont relaoding? did i miss anything

[SpadeHand]

Aw, with a gun like this, it's sometimes nicer to reload slowly

[szinyovszky]

ohh this is great gun! my uncle had one but he gave it to someone :S a want it back XD

[ifssal]

Good vid, I love that gun.  Are you using Nagant ammo or .32?

[deadmeat952]

using .32 there, nagant ammo's just too expensive when .32 works fine in it

[John234pwns]

I'm not too familiar with the Nagant, can it use .32 the same way a .357 can use a 38 special?

[mini4m3]

Kind've - but not really. In this video those are not 32ACP but 32SW Longs which will work 100% of the time.

[John234pwns]

So its not designed to , but it'll work?

[mini4m3]

Yes - accuracy will deminish though.

[CSSstravag]

It was originally chambered to a proprietary cartridge (I forget what), but the bore and headspace is close enough to .32 S&W Long that you can use off-the-shelf 32 in it without issue.

38 Spec / 357 Mag is a different fish altogether. 357 Mag is a beefcake 38 Special, not an interchange with a different caliber. Of course, if you are a cheapie, you can use .38 in a .357, just be sure to inspect your cylinders for throat erosion after doing it.

[SGM815]

.32 ACP?



[SGM815]

.32 ACP or .32 S&W Long?

[iloveguns1990]

There is one weapon I would never use in a firefight.

[SashaVedernikov]

These were mostly used as a last result weapon,Assasinating Nazi prisoners,and clearing out buildings. The Russian would have the PPSH in a firefight

[mini4m3]

The truth is that these revolves killed more russians than external forces. During the pograms and purges this was the weapon of choice.

[wangl601]

I'm wondering what will happpen to this buddy if it's in real warfare......

[coltgunman]

"Slow as fuck"... I love it!!!

[24GordonFan223]

doesn't make the SAA any faster to reload vs a m1895, in fact i think they're about the same.. i was just saying..

[mini4m3]

I never said it was faster, read my comment again please.

[24GordonFan223]

ohh ok, lol, nvm, lol

[24GordonFan223]

soo.. like the Colt Single Action Army is any better?

not about speed, its about precision and accuracy

[deadmeat952]

lol forgot to mention it in the description at the time but my friend and i were racing to see who could reload faster which is why speed was important

[mini4m3]

It is when this gun was kept as a front line weapon late into the 1940s. The Colt SAA was used against guns similar to itself, where as this gun was used against fully automatic and semi automatic weapons.