The reason we see more persistent contrails now than we did in the 70s is because of the number of flights every day. In the 70s it was not a common thing to see a passenger jet in the sky. Today you can hardly look up without seeing at lest one. It is just a matter of number, more adn much larger jets flying higher than ever make more contrails.
@Epoxynous Hmm.. i trust in you, maybe you are right.but explain why an italian guy has a copy and it's ripped (some pages) and added pages with long trails pictures.I'm just buying one of these ... i'll see.Take a look at the "tankerenemy" video that show why it's fake" :) i don't know...
THIS BOOK IS FAKE, AS SHOWN IN ANOTHER VIDEO, A LOT OF PAGES WERE RIPPED OFF AND REBUILDED!!!! FIND AN ORIGINAL COPY, IT DOESN'T HAS THOSE PICS INSIDE OF IT!!!!!!!!!!!!! STOP DISINFORMING!
@mem- Simply calling me a liar without a shred of evidence or proof - doesn't make it so...its a desperate attempt to remain relevant. YOU claim contrails can't persist, never have and no one has actually seen ANY contrail- persistent or not- ALL of those claims are demonstrably and verifiably false...and yet you refuse to even discuss the physics that render your claims bogus. None of the "scientists" in your propaganda vid said contrails couldn't persist.
@mim- for as much as you rail on the patterns of disinfo everywhere- your video seems to be a classic example - pure propaganda- carefully crafted to evoke fear, menacing quotes taken out of context, speculation purveyed as fact etc...
The "Informed Consent" clause included in Public law 105-85 is fulfilled once the law is published. The UCC requirements for "consent" make section C of the law of no effect once the law is made public.
Remember, ignorance of the law is no excuse, so if you have not opposed this law in court, you have consented.
@Epoxynous If you want to know what informed consent means under UCC law, follow the link:
urlbam - com/ha/M002Y
In brief, once the law is made public, then "each human subject" has consented. So, once published, section C of 105-85 is fulfilled and spraying continues lawfully without public opposition.
This is the reason why all of these tests were conducted and no crimes were ever committed:
@mmem701 Again I would suggest you actually check with a lawyer. Implied consent still requires some action on the part of the person consenting, and specific knowledge of what they are consenting to. No court would every uphold the interpretation you put on the law.
Sorry Thor. You're lying. You're the same Thor that lies and spreads disinformation on other forums.
About public law 105-85. I already provided a link that clearly explains how it allows the government to spray U.S. citizens. You obviously didn't bother to visit it. Here is the link again:
urlbam - com/ha/M002Y
U.S. citizens, realize that disinformation is alive and well. Please know that disinformation has been used against you for years:
@mmem701 Public law 105-85, Sec. 1078, actually prevents such experiments except for peaceful purposes, and those can ONLY be performed if informed consent is obtained from each test subject. It’s basically the same procedure as for human drug trials.
You should read the actual law. Google for "chemtrail myths", then click the link in myth #5
Astonishing the word games that you play. Chemtrail spraying is an open, unclassified, legalized (public law 105-85) activity, and although it's horribly harmful to humans, you continue to spread harmful pure disinformation. So many people I know are suffering from elevated blood aluminum and barium/mercury symptoms since spraying began in their area. The work you are doing - spreading disinformation - is akin to telling people that the mystery white powder is perfectly safe to eat.
@MEM- quit lying mem. Your distorted reality is tiresome. Please show exactly where in law 105-85 it is specifically authorized to "spray" barium.
U R either lying or ignorant.
Which is it?
...funny how you avoid the actual science behind contrail persistence. UR continued avoidance is highly telling and an indication of your failure.
Oh...and why do I have a copy of this book just as it was published 35yrs ago that is identical to this version. Ignoring reality will not make it go away
he can't explain why a copy of this book purchased over 35yrs ago is identical to the one in this video.
He can't provide proof of his claim that "chemtrails" is an "admitted" program. Suggesting calls for geo-engineering is proof that every trail in the sky is really a clandestine 'spray" campaign is all he can offer.
he can't seem to explain why he disagrees with the physics that dictates the behavior of contrails...
You have resorted to to name-calling, insults, and strawman arguments, and you ignore all of the evidence and information that I've provided. Simply put, you are censoring yourself. Well, good luck with that.
@mmem701 - You have not presented any credible evidence...not a shred.
Moreover, you simply refuse to discuss undeniable evidence that refutes your claims. Sticking your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes will not make it go away. Your silence on those matters is telling in its failure.
That you are a Fool is not an insult merely a fact.
Why do I have a copy that was purchased 35 years ago that is identical to the one in this video?
In order to be taken seriously which you appear to desperately want...you need to offer proof of your claims. Otherwise, you will be just be another fear mongering, lying fool on the internet.
The book in this video is a well-known deception. All disinformation shills need to remember that - historically (not in theory) - disinformation workers are a threat to the very people they work for. They have historically been the first to be "silenced" by their employers. Being a disinformer is not only a crime, it's just plain stupid.
Soil aluminum levels are rising and massive wildlife die-offs are occurring. I have witness 2 of these event personally. These people who deny chemtrails are mostly shills spreading disinformation and are as guilty for the resultant suffering as those giving the orders to spray: watch?v=PtlOXhSnNw8
In April 2010, 90% of all geoengineering operations in our area went high-altitude and are no longer visible from the ground. Still, the metallic taste remains in the air, insects are still dying and soil-aluminum levels are still soaring.
Disinformation is very real, and disinformants have historically been the greatest liabilities to their employers after their job is done. Those involved in disinformation should be very away of this aspect of history.
@mmem701 - so, you can't see "them" but know they are still there...You do understand that a metallic taste is an indication of your internal health rather than an ambient cause...of course, never mind that schizophrenia patients often report a metallic taste too. Ignorance is very real and the internet only exacerbates the problem. No consequence for error on the internet- only indoctrination.
@TheThorazineShuffle Schizophrenia patients often do experience a metallic taste, this is true, but that is because schizophrenia is caused by mercury toxicity which leaks from the mercury/amalgam metal fillings in their mouths.
@mmem701 - alas, not every schizo patient who experiences the taste of metal has mercury fillings...that is an correlation not based on proven fact and seems like disinfo designed to promote propaganda.
@TheThorazineShuffle Amazing how you state the negative as a fact. Sad truth is that you don't know the answer, yet you are pretending to. Yes, mercury does cause this disease, and many others. So why don't you tell us where that metal taste comes from. You are a shill, and it disgusts me that you speak about things you know nothing about.
@TheThorazineShuffle Any by the way, you misquoted me. I said they can't be seen from the ground, but they are clearly visible from commercial jets. They fly about 1 to 2000 feet above commercial traffic (33,000 feed). This move is clearly to avoid any more public scrutiny that has been widespread because of the overwhelming spraying that people have been witnessing and suffering from (health-wise). People are getting fed up with the profound corruption in government.
@mmem701- are you really suggesting that commercial planes only fly at one altitude? Is every video from the cockpit showing contrails of other planes just planted disinfo? Please explain why these commercial planes are leaving contrails- You are not portraying an accurate picture of reality.
watch?v=5LjgRwLL8Ow
watch?v=eUXfbRkPkNQ (these trails are BELOW the other plane)
@TheThorazineShuffle I never said that. You are playing strawman word games. How disgusting. This is the most serious issue humanity has ever faced and you want to spread disinformation. I already told you that military jets are often painted as commercial jets and flown near other commercial flights so the video taken eventually ends up on the internet in order to claim that chemtrails don't exist. Chemtrails are an open program. It's known and documented to be in progress.
@mmem701 - you truly do not even know how empty and ridiculous your words are? You make outlandish claim after outlandish claim with not a shred of evidence to back it up...You are beyond the pale.
@TheThorazineShuffle Wow. That's deep. It's amazing how much you "care" that - in your opinion - there are a bunch of loons out here believing that chemtrails exist. Interesting how you should take such in interest in it.
Aerosol spraying has been going on since the Vietnam war, nevertheless, many of the books and videos on YouTube have been altered to attempt to disinform the public. None of this discounts the fact that geoengineering (spraying aluminum and other metals) into the atmosphere is an official government program. Whether they make trails or not is irrelevant. The bottom line is that it is occurring.
@mmem701 _ why do I have family photos from the 60s and 70s with persistent contrails in them? WHy does physics undeniably determine what will happen to water vapor ejected into air that is -30 below and humid? Just making outlandish statements on the internet without proof or evidence smacks of "disinfo"-
@TheThorazineShuffle Spraying has been in effect in certain area from before the Vietnam war. There are literally hundreds of declassified documents showing that the government has routinely sprayed populated areas for "testing" purposes. You must be one of the lucky ones to have experienced it first-hand. Lucky you. Now it's time to overcome your fearful denial of documented facts. This problem is not going away by itself.
@mmem701 - This book is not "altered". I have a copy of it as it was first published- it has been in my family since it was first purchased 35yrs ago. You are either lying or ignorant...which is it?
@TheThorazineShuffle You obviously have no concept of disinformation. In some cases, commercial jets have been painted to cover up CIA flying operations, and the same occurs with the massive geoengineering operation. Movies are altered on a regular basis. Chemtrails are injected into video and pictures on Saturday-morning TV all the time, so children become used to seeing jet-trails. Part of growing up is realizing that evil does exist in the world. Maturity means overcoming your fears.
@mmem701 - Why were they studying persistent contrails in the 1950s,60s and 70s if they do not exist. You clearly have not overcome your fear of reality...maturity indeed.
@TheThorazineShuffle The skies are saturated in chemtrails so much so that the entire sky becomes overcast. When this occurs, people get sick, tired, achy, migraines, etc., and this is all consistent with mercury, aluminum, and barium exposure. And you say this is normal? I'm not young and I find your disinformation disgusting and harmful.
@mmem701 you conveniently neglected to discuss the proven science of atmospheric physics. Can you think of a reason why scientists for 40years have studied contrails that persist and spread. can you think of reason why not a single atmospheric scientists ANYWHERE in the world agrees with you? HOw about pilots who for years have witnessed persistent contrails and even their own?? Your views just do not reflect accepted reality.
@TheThorazineShuffle Another thing you need to learn about before mindlessly commenting on this subject is that these large programs have been frequently delayed (for years). For this reason, you have artifacts (like this book) that contain artifacts of early disinformation. You are doing irreversible harm to people by spreading this disinformation. So many have already died as a result (aneurysm, heart attacks, strokes, etc.). This is a crime against humanity unmatched in human history.
@mmem701 - Judge NOT Mem- you knowing nothing of me and your insults is a deflection of truth, a reflection of your own failures of knowledge. The fact remains persistent contrail have been observed, documented, studied, replicated in labs, sampled directly in the atmosphere in EVERY decade. The physics is not disinfo. YOU could replicate a persistent contrail if you chose- but you will not as that would shatter your mythos and force you to face reality.
@TheThorazineShuffle The truth remains that the global geoengineering program is an open program. It is in place. Your level of denial is fascinating. We have chemtrails saturating the sky (suddenly), people then come down with various illnesses, soil aluminum levels are rising, multiple air tests have been done, dust particulate tests have been conducted, and all show hugely disproportionate levels of aluminum and barium. What exactly are you missing? Why are you spreading disinformation?
@mmem701 - Global "geo-engineering" is a catch-all phrase meaning different thinsg to different people. I dare you to provide one verified source proving your claim that "chemtrails" are "admitted" to. You won't because you can't and it is evidence of your failure. Your fear mongering is disgusting and harmful and you should be ashamed.
SAW ONE TODAY OVER RENFREW ST. BURNABY, BC. HUGE, LONG AND WIDE TRAIL - CLOSER THAN ANYTHING I HAVE SEEN SO I KNOW ITS NOT AN AIRPLANE CARRYING PASSENGERS. ALSO WENT IN A HALF-MOON TYPE OF FLIGHT - NOT STRAIGHT. RIGHT OVER MY HEAD. Took 20 minutes to dissapate.
the whole chaff thing is a joke. the word persistant contrails is a joke. freemason weather men are a joke. chemtrails come from tanker jets, every inch of the planet is being sprayed. stop falling for simple disinformation, RESEARCH. OR LOOK UP IDIOTS
lol i watch these tankers all of the time. we've been getting sprayed in toronto for 9 days in a row LOL! look at the youtube account TANKERENEMY, he has good footage of the tankers in action. i also have pictures of them on my account. if you haven't figured it out by now, then you'll never get it. i didn't get caught up in a hoax, i knew what they were BEFORE they started spraying in canada. you can even clearly see scalar technology in use on a daily basis *magnetic anomolies*
But why are there no clear photos? Why no photos showing spraying apparatus? If they do it so often there must be hundreds of these jets. It's not hard to take a photo, so why are there none?
Send me a link
Have you considered you might simply be mistaking regular air traffic for "tankers"?
Hey ass, because people didn't have the internet in the 70's most didn't know the government you are working for was modifying the weather. So why or how would people take clear photos of something they don't know exist?
oh and can i see some of these pictures of your "spraying apparatus"?
any pictures that you people have claimed to be involved with chem trails is either a cloud sample aircraft or a midair refuel tanker or my personal favorite the Evergreen 747
I agree, this book is a fake. Watch this video from 1:43 until end. The pages that hold the "contrail" information do not lie flat like the rest of the book! Joke's on you, Epoxy!
Please provide proof that there are any "extra" chemicals in any persistent contrail, or "chemtrail", as you call them.
Claiming something as fact requires you, the claimant, to provide proof to me, the skeptic (also, a person educated in these subjects which include meteorology and general aviation.).
So, I will be waiting for supposed "facts" to back up your claim. Thank you
Oh, youtube videos don't count as proof. That would be ridiculous!
it's useless to reply with a video i know,but,do you ever watch the german weather video?i've got a lot of reasons to say that those trails aren't normal...i don't want to write anymore,sorry
You are a moron. Obviously you can't understand German because that video refers to chaff dropped from military planes. It has nothing to do with contrails or chemtrails .
The translation in that video is even more ridiculous than this one: watch?v=QDgzAp0-zYQ
epoxynous is a great source for seeing just how long this criminal practice has been in the works. his book authors are some of the highest ranking scientists involved in noaa and national weather service. apparently plausible deniability was in the works 50 years ago. rat bastards all.....
you are interesting Epoxynous. you have modified your style somewhat. very subtle and effective i must say...but you know the answers to your queeries so why should we tangle up again. you've got a job to do and you are wasting your time with me...onward to the newbies sergeant, there's debunking to be done!
Soon every one will know , because there pall the tv will tell them , but than it will look like they are trying to save us and that there arn't harmful effect ( right ;) )
Truth will prevail , chemtrails are a fact.
Orgonite is easy to make and can help clear the atmosphere!
I think you miss the point. This is strong evidence that persistent contrails are normal, and have been around since the dawn of aviation.
There are account all the way back to 1921. Obviously nobody has been "spraying" since 1921. It's just contrails, formed from the water vapor in aircraft engine exhaust, which turns to ice at the cold temperatures (-40) found at high altitude.
Yes, I would love to believe that these are just contrails. But, i saw them sprayed the first week of each month since last summer. They were sprayed last week in my area. Funny how the trails I saw were only on one area of the sky covering the sunset, but none anywhere else in the sky. These were sprayed at or around sunset every month. The trails I saw last week were still visible the next morning. They don't go away, they linger..In this case for over 12 hours. Do contrails do that?
Last question. People trying to raise awareness to these Chemtrails post videos to raise awareness and possibly save lungs.(good intentions). What drives you to disprove?
1000's of Chemtrail videos and only a handful on your side of the fence.
If they are Contrails then what about the samples of Barium and Aluminum found in the fallout? What about the gov. documents? Why so many now, all over the world? What about the photos of the planes with pics of the inside the plane (Tanks and Hoses)? Why are these trails happening on a monthly basis almost on a schedule. I think some of the photos you showed were added they look too clear for the 70's. More questions than answers..
Orville and Wilbur were in 1904. The first high altitude flights that produced persistent contrails were around 1920. They were documented in 1921. See the article "Pre WWII Contrails" on contrailscience. com, or google:
Could very well be that there was early testing of these systems? I'm not saying I know for sure what these trails are but I lived in New York and Los Angeles and never seen this. I would have noticed.
The descriptions of persistent spreading contrails are consistent all the way back to first observed one in 1921, which was when planes first got to that altitude. So, no, it's not early testing, it's just contrails.
There are more planes now. But really, why would you remember something you did not pay much attention to. Sure, you might have noticed them - but without them being pointed out as being "chemtrails", why would you remember them? What DO you remember?
You so NO, like you have proof... You can't do that cause you don't know... I'm speculating and you are spouting FACT... You have no basis to say "So, no, it's not early testing, it's just contrails." That is wrong.
I don't have proof of the non-existence of a lot of things. Check out my favorite videos and watch "Richard Dawkin's The God Delusion Tea Pot" video.
The accounts of contrails like this go back to 1921. Sure, you can believe things because there is no proof that they are not true - but then how do you choose what to believe. Surely at least the evidence that something MIGHT be true needs to outweigh the evidence that it is not.
I know all about Dawkins and while agreeing with a lot of what he says, he tends to come off like a dick and arrogant, it's why "unfortunately" he wont reach more people.
My first fact is my eyes. imagine you had a wall and it was hot to the touch. I tell you and you say... Nah, that wall gets hot sometimes on and off. I say, "Well, if there is a short, it could set the house on fire," What would you do? Stick with what you know or have it tested?
I agree with you about Dawkins, he has an unfortunate manner sometimes.
People would agree that your hot wall was rather unusual. But are spreading contrails unusual? Perhaps they are to you, as you don't remember them. But to scientists, persistent spreading contrails ARE normal.
Which scientists? Try going to Google Scholar, and searching for "persistent contrails"
I looked up a lot of stuff on Contrails and they don't have all the answers either. Ice Crystals, Sulfur content of the fuel, contrails forming cirrus clouds. All of that is there and by no means does it seem like this is normal. On a lot of papers "More Research needed" was stated.
Something has changed and I want it looked into... Might be as simple as they changed the fuel and it's causing this much more than it used to.
I added a video of the 1963 book. Check my videos.
Water itself is not fully understood - the way it changes from liquid to solid is incredibly complex. Much of science is simply a very good approximation of how things work. Contrail formation is not perfectly understood, but the basic principals are very well understood. Engines make water, water freezes into clouds, if the air is humid enough then they persist and spread.
But that is not what was started in about 4 or 5 things I read on Google Scholar... You mentioned of the sulfur amounts in fuel or that they stated that it creates cirrus clouds and we are not talking small ones... Ones that show up on radar.
Also the fact that many seem to think further study is needed. Seems like you just want to prove me wrong, instead of wanted to know what is really happening.
so....you are saying these giant sometimes checker board patterned, streamers in the sky over and over day after day were always here, we just started noticing them.
wow, that's a load of bullshit that takes leaps and bounds of faith,
From a person who knows planes and airports because they were all around me and has always looked at the sky because I lived in a high rise apartment building,
...it's at the height of sick that you're convinced I never looked at the sky and just never noticed giant lines all over the place despite the fact there were many airports and crosspaths in the highly populated area I'm from.
I'm curious: How old are you and where are you from?
LoL...you expect us to believe that chemtrails are clouds when we see them being formed in the sky by planes? How fucken stupid do you really think we are? Take your disinformation BS and shove it where the sun dont shine (and I dont mean where the sun doesn't shine because the chemtrails are covering it up).
All you chemtards watch the Memphis Belle WWII Bomber video in the related section and see how wrong you are about chemtrails just now showing up.
WhiteGangster400 8 months ago
The reason we see more persistent contrails now than we did in the 70s is because of the number of flights every day. In the 70s it was not a common thing to see a passenger jet in the sky. Today you can hardly look up without seeing at lest one. It is just a matter of number, more adn much larger jets flying higher than ever make more contrails.
watch?v=G1L4GUA8arY
ChrisArcen 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THIS BOOK IS FAKED ...IT EXISTS BUT SOME PAGES DON'T EXISTS IN THE REAL 1972 EDITION!!! WHO FAKED IT??? AND WHY? CHEMITRAILS EXISTS!!!
TIX74 1 year ago
@TIX74 Why would it need to be fake? It just shows the exact same things that are in other books, newspapers and old photographs.
That other video that supposedly shows it to be fake shows exactly the same book.
Why don't you order a copy through your local library (it's free) and see what happens.
Epoxynous 1 year ago 4
@Epoxynous Hmm.. i trust in you, maybe you are right.but explain why an italian guy has a copy and it's ripped (some pages) and added pages with long trails pictures.I'm just buying one of these ... i'll see.Take a look at the "tankerenemy" video that show why it's fake" :) i don't know...
TIX74 1 year ago
@TIX74 Yes, I've seen the TankerEnemy video.
I bought the book on Amazon, there's 7 available now, from $11.71, so go for it.
Epoxynous 1 year ago
THIS BOOK IS FAKE, AS SHOWN IN ANOTHER VIDEO, A LOT OF PAGES WERE RIPPED OFF AND REBUILDED!!!! FIND AN ORIGINAL COPY, IT DOESN'T HAS THOSE PICS INSIDE OF IT!!!!!!!!!!!!! STOP DISINFORMING!
TIX74 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Clouds of the world is FAKE! watch?v=kM75WU-ko9U the book is fake!
Proof?
urlbam - com/ha/M003m
mmem701 1 year ago
And for those who are interested in the science behind chemtrails... Take a look at what these scientists have to say:
urlbam - com/ha/M003m
mmem701 1 year ago
@mem- Simply calling me a liar without a shred of evidence or proof - doesn't make it so...its a desperate attempt to remain relevant. YOU claim contrails can't persist, never have and no one has actually seen ANY contrail- persistent or not- ALL of those claims are demonstrably and verifiably false...and yet you refuse to even discuss the physics that render your claims bogus. None of the "scientists" in your propaganda vid said contrails couldn't persist.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@mim- for as much as you rail on the patterns of disinfo everywhere- your video seems to be a classic example - pure propaganda- carefully crafted to evoke fear, menacing quotes taken out of context, speculation purveyed as fact etc...
Seems like you are becoming your own worst enemy.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
Wrong again Thorboy.
The "Informed Consent" clause included in Public law 105-85 is fulfilled once the law is published. The UCC requirements for "consent" make section C of the law of no effect once the law is made public.
Remember, ignorance of the law is no excuse, so if you have not opposed this law in court, you have consented.
For a detailed explanation, see this link:
urlbam - com/ha/M002Y
Look under the heading "informed consent".
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 So you say, that the actual section c of the law, which reads:
(c) Informed Consent Required.--The Secretary of Defense may conduct
a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed
consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance
of the testing on that subject.
means that they DON'T need to obtain consent? You might want to check with a lawyer on that one. :)
Epoxynous 1 year ago
@Epoxynous If you want to know what informed consent means under UCC law, follow the link:
urlbam - com/ha/M002Y
In brief, once the law is made public, then "each human subject" has consented. So, once published, section C of 105-85 is fulfilled and spraying continues lawfully without public opposition.
This is the reason why all of these tests were conducted and no crimes were ever committed:
urlbam - com/ha/M003w
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 Again I would suggest you actually check with a lawyer. Implied consent still requires some action on the part of the person consenting, and specific knowledge of what they are consenting to. No court would every uphold the interpretation you put on the law.
Epoxynous 1 year ago
Sorry Thor. You're lying. You're the same Thor that lies and spreads disinformation on other forums.
About public law 105-85. I already provided a link that clearly explains how it allows the government to spray U.S. citizens. You obviously didn't bother to visit it. Here is the link again:
urlbam - com/ha/M002Y
U.S. citizens, realize that disinformation is alive and well. Please know that disinformation has been used against you for years:
urlbam - com/ha/M003v
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 Public law 105-85, Sec. 1078, actually prevents such experiments except for peaceful purposes, and those can ONLY be performed if informed consent is obtained from each test subject. It’s basically the same procedure as for human drug trials.
You should read the actual law. Google for "chemtrail myths", then click the link in myth #5
Epoxynous 1 year ago
Astonishing the word games that you play. Chemtrail spraying is an open, unclassified, legalized (public law 105-85) activity, and although it's horribly harmful to humans, you continue to spread harmful pure disinformation. So many people I know are suffering from elevated blood aluminum and barium/mercury symptoms since spraying began in their area. The work you are doing - spreading disinformation - is akin to telling people that the mystery white powder is perfectly safe to eat.
mmem701 1 year ago
@MEM- quit lying mem. Your distorted reality is tiresome. Please show exactly where in law 105-85 it is specifically authorized to "spray" barium.
U R either lying or ignorant.
Which is it?
...funny how you avoid the actual science behind contrail persistence. UR continued avoidance is highly telling and an indication of your failure.
Oh...and why do I have a copy of this book just as it was published 35yrs ago that is identical to this version. Ignoring reality will not make it go away
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
lets see how mem fails shall we?
he can't explain why a copy of this book purchased over 35yrs ago is identical to the one in this video.
He can't provide proof of his claim that "chemtrails" is an "admitted" program. Suggesting calls for geo-engineering is proof that every trail in the sky is really a clandestine 'spray" campaign is all he can offer.
he can't seem to explain why he disagrees with the physics that dictates the behavior of contrails...
In the end he has nothing but fear.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
You have resorted to to name-calling, insults, and strawman arguments, and you ignore all of the evidence and information that I've provided. Simply put, you are censoring yourself. Well, good luck with that.
urlbam - com/ha/M001R
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - You have not presented any credible evidence...not a shred.
Moreover, you simply refuse to discuss undeniable evidence that refutes your claims. Sticking your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes will not make it go away. Your silence on those matters is telling in its failure.
That you are a Fool is not an insult merely a fact.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
Here is some other documentation about chemical/biological testing on humans:
urlbam - com/ha/M003x
urlbam - com/ha/M003w
urlbam - com/ha/M003y
mmem701 1 year ago
The best way to control the future is to control the past. This is what this deceptive video (and YouTube channel) is all about.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - How is it a fraud? prove it? -
Why do I have a copy that was purchased 35 years ago that is identical to the one in this video?
In order to be taken seriously which you appear to desperately want...you need to offer proof of your claims. Otherwise, you will be just be another fear mongering, lying fool on the internet.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
The book in this video is a well-known deception. All disinformation shills need to remember that - historically (not in theory) - disinformation workers are a threat to the very people they work for. They have historically been the first to be "silenced" by their employers. Being a disinformer is not only a crime, it's just plain stupid.
mmem701 1 year ago
Soil aluminum levels are rising and massive wildlife die-offs are occurring. I have witness 2 of these event personally. These people who deny chemtrails are mostly shills spreading disinformation and are as guilty for the resultant suffering as those giving the orders to spray: watch?v=PtlOXhSnNw8
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - provide documentation or quit lying.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle What exactly are you missing? watch?v=PtlOXhSnNw8
mmem701 1 year ago
In April 2010, 90% of all geoengineering operations in our area went high-altitude and are no longer visible from the ground. Still, the metallic taste remains in the air, insects are still dying and soil-aluminum levels are still soaring.
Disinformation is very real, and disinformants have historically been the greatest liabilities to their employers after their job is done. Those involved in disinformation should be very away of this aspect of history.
watch?v=1QpDvNtoU4U
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - so, you can't see "them" but know they are still there...You do understand that a metallic taste is an indication of your internal health rather than an ambient cause...of course, never mind that schizophrenia patients often report a metallic taste too. Ignorance is very real and the internet only exacerbates the problem. No consequence for error on the internet- only indoctrination.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle Schizophrenia patients often do experience a metallic taste, this is true, but that is because schizophrenia is caused by mercury toxicity which leaks from the mercury/amalgam metal fillings in their mouths.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - alas, not every schizo patient who experiences the taste of metal has mercury fillings...that is an correlation not based on proven fact and seems like disinfo designed to promote propaganda.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle Amazing how you state the negative as a fact. Sad truth is that you don't know the answer, yet you are pretending to. Yes, mercury does cause this disease, and many others. So why don't you tell us where that metal taste comes from. You are a shill, and it disgusts me that you speak about things you know nothing about.
mmem701 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle Any by the way, you misquoted me. I said they can't be seen from the ground, but they are clearly visible from commercial jets. They fly about 1 to 2000 feet above commercial traffic (33,000 feed). This move is clearly to avoid any more public scrutiny that has been widespread because of the overwhelming spraying that people have been witnessing and suffering from (health-wise). People are getting fed up with the profound corruption in government.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701- are you really suggesting that commercial planes only fly at one altitude? Is every video from the cockpit showing contrails of other planes just planted disinfo? Please explain why these commercial planes are leaving contrails- You are not portraying an accurate picture of reality.
watch?v=5LjgRwLL8Ow
watch?v=eUXfbRkPkNQ (these trails are BELOW the other plane)
watch?v=aSIabcNRri4
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle I never said that. You are playing strawman word games. How disgusting. This is the most serious issue humanity has ever faced and you want to spread disinformation. I already told you that military jets are often painted as commercial jets and flown near other commercial flights so the video taken eventually ends up on the internet in order to claim that chemtrails don't exist. Chemtrails are an open program. It's known and documented to be in progress.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - you truly do not even know how empty and ridiculous your words are? You make outlandish claim after outlandish claim with not a shred of evidence to back it up...You are beyond the pale.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle Wow. That's deep. It's amazing how much you "care" that - in your opinion - there are a bunch of loons out here believing that chemtrails exist. Interesting how you should take such in interest in it.
chemtrails911 - com/supporting_evidence.htm
mmem701 1 year ago
Aerosol spraying has been going on since the Vietnam war, nevertheless, many of the books and videos on YouTube have been altered to attempt to disinform the public. None of this discounts the fact that geoengineering (spraying aluminum and other metals) into the atmosphere is an official government program. Whether they make trails or not is irrelevant. The bottom line is that it is occurring.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 _ why do I have family photos from the 60s and 70s with persistent contrails in them? WHy does physics undeniably determine what will happen to water vapor ejected into air that is -30 below and humid? Just making outlandish statements on the internet without proof or evidence smacks of "disinfo"-
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle Spraying has been in effect in certain area from before the Vietnam war. There are literally hundreds of declassified documents showing that the government has routinely sprayed populated areas for "testing" purposes. You must be one of the lucky ones to have experienced it first-hand. Lucky you. Now it's time to overcome your fearful denial of documented facts. This problem is not going away by itself.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - but none of those "tests" involved persistent trails that spread out into a haze of cirrus-like clouds...nor were they "sprayed".
Are you suggesting that physics is disinformation?
What happens to water vapor at -35 below and 70% humidity?
Why have persistent contrails been reported since the 30s?
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@mmem701 - This book is not "altered". I have a copy of it as it was first published- it has been in my family since it was first purchased 35yrs ago. You are either lying or ignorant...which is it?
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle You obviously have no concept of disinformation. In some cases, commercial jets have been painted to cover up CIA flying operations, and the same occurs with the massive geoengineering operation. Movies are altered on a regular basis. Chemtrails are injected into video and pictures on Saturday-morning TV all the time, so children become used to seeing jet-trails. Part of growing up is realizing that evil does exist in the world. Maturity means overcoming your fears.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - Why were they studying persistent contrails in the 1950s,60s and 70s if they do not exist. You clearly have not overcome your fear of reality...maturity indeed.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle The skies are saturated in chemtrails so much so that the entire sky becomes overcast. When this occurs, people get sick, tired, achy, migraines, etc., and this is all consistent with mercury, aluminum, and barium exposure. And you say this is normal? I'm not young and I find your disinformation disgusting and harmful.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 you conveniently neglected to discuss the proven science of atmospheric physics. Can you think of a reason why scientists for 40years have studied contrails that persist and spread. can you think of reason why not a single atmospheric scientists ANYWHERE in the world agrees with you? HOw about pilots who for years have witnessed persistent contrails and even their own?? Your views just do not reflect accepted reality.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle Another thing you need to learn about before mindlessly commenting on this subject is that these large programs have been frequently delayed (for years). For this reason, you have artifacts (like this book) that contain artifacts of early disinformation. You are doing irreversible harm to people by spreading this disinformation. So many have already died as a result (aneurysm, heart attacks, strokes, etc.). This is a crime against humanity unmatched in human history.
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - Judge NOT Mem- you knowing nothing of me and your insults is a deflection of truth, a reflection of your own failures of knowledge. The fact remains persistent contrail have been observed, documented, studied, replicated in labs, sampled directly in the atmosphere in EVERY decade. The physics is not disinfo. YOU could replicate a persistent contrail if you chose- but you will not as that would shatter your mythos and force you to face reality.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
@TheThorazineShuffle The truth remains that the global geoengineering program is an open program. It is in place. Your level of denial is fascinating. We have chemtrails saturating the sky (suddenly), people then come down with various illnesses, soil aluminum levels are rising, multiple air tests have been done, dust particulate tests have been conducted, and all show hugely disproportionate levels of aluminum and barium. What exactly are you missing? Why are you spreading disinformation?
mmem701 1 year ago
@mmem701 - Global "geo-engineering" is a catch-all phrase meaning different thinsg to different people. I dare you to provide one verified source proving your claim that "chemtrails" are "admitted" to. You won't because you can't and it is evidence of your failure. Your fear mongering is disgusting and harmful and you should be ashamed.
TheThorazineShuffle 1 year ago
SAW ONE TODAY OVER RENFREW ST. BURNABY, BC. HUGE, LONG AND WIDE TRAIL - CLOSER THAN ANYTHING I HAVE SEEN SO I KNOW ITS NOT AN AIRPLANE CARRYING PASSENGERS. ALSO WENT IN A HALF-MOON TYPE OF FLIGHT - NOT STRAIGHT. RIGHT OVER MY HEAD. Took 20 minutes to dissapate.
RedStar2fly 1 year ago
the whole chaff thing is a joke. the word persistant contrails is a joke. freemason weather men are a joke. chemtrails come from tanker jets, every inch of the planet is being sprayed. stop falling for simple disinformation, RESEARCH. OR LOOK UP IDIOTS
Wakeupsleepyhead1984 2 years ago
If so, then why are there no clear photos of these tanker jets?
Epoxynous 2 years ago
lol i watch these tankers all of the time. we've been getting sprayed in toronto for 9 days in a row LOL! look at the youtube account TANKERENEMY, he has good footage of the tankers in action. i also have pictures of them on my account. if you haven't figured it out by now, then you'll never get it. i didn't get caught up in a hoax, i knew what they were BEFORE they started spraying in canada. you can even clearly see scalar technology in use on a daily basis *magnetic anomolies*
Wakeupsleepyhead1984 2 years ago
But why are there no clear photos? Why no photos showing spraying apparatus? If they do it so often there must be hundreds of these jets. It's not hard to take a photo, so why are there none?
Send me a link
Have you considered you might simply be mistaking regular air traffic for "tankers"?
Epoxynous 2 years ago
Hey ass, because people didn't have the internet in the 70's most didn't know the government you are working for was modifying the weather. So why or how would people take clear photos of something they don't know exist?
ddarko2012 1 year ago
@ddarko2012 I mean clear photos NOW. Photos of tankers and nozzles.
There are lots of photos of persistent contrails from the 1970s. Like the ones in this video.
Epoxynous 1 year ago
oh and can i see some of these pictures of your "spraying apparatus"?
any pictures that you people have claimed to be involved with chem trails is either a cloud sample aircraft or a midair refuel tanker or my personal favorite the Evergreen 747
FireFighterrock24 2 years ago
I agree, this book is a fake. Watch this video from 1:43 until end. The pages that hold the "contrail" information do not lie flat like the rest of the book! Joke's on you, Epoxy!
blockclubof1 3 years ago 2
Are you serious? Have you ever seen a book? Open it in the middle, the pages don't lie flat.
Epoxynous 3 years ago
My goodness these guys are delusional. Worse than arguing with YECreationists.
GregOrca 2 years ago
clouds of the world is FAKE! watch?v=kM75WU-ko9U the book is fake!
chemtrails are fact!
GrovniTeam 3 years ago 3
Yes watch that video to see the extent of straw-grasping people will stoop to when they are wrong :)
Of course it's not fake. My copy is a UK original, ISBN 071535485X, and does not have extra pages (obviously a printer error).
OR just google for ""clouds of the world"+scorer" and tell me that it's fake.
You have a fascinating view of the world.
Epoxynous 3 years ago
"chemtrails are fact! "
Please provide proof that there are any "extra" chemicals in any persistent contrail, or "chemtrail", as you call them.
Claiming something as fact requires you, the claimant, to provide proof to me, the skeptic (also, a person educated in these subjects which include meteorology and general aviation.).
So, I will be waiting for supposed "facts" to back up your claim. Thank you
Oh, youtube videos don't count as proof. That would be ridiculous!
UninterestedNU 2 years ago
it's useless to reply with a video i know,but,do you ever watch the german weather video?i've got a lot of reasons to say that those trails aren't normal...i don't want to write anymore,sorry
peace ^^
GrovniTeam 2 years ago
And I have my reasons to know they are normal.
But, even if they aren't "normal", does that prove that every trail in all these stupid youtube videos is a "chemtrail? Nope!
I don't want to write anymore, either.
Peace!
UninterestedNU 2 years ago
You are a moron. Obviously you can't understand German because that video refers to chaff dropped from military planes. It has nothing to do with contrails or chemtrails .
The translation in that video is even more ridiculous than this one: watch?v=QDgzAp0-zYQ
GregOrca 2 years ago 3
This video is bs chemtrails are a fact , may be if you go out once in a while and start caring about your fellow humans you would see.
But you have a long way to go!
AweSomo84 3 years ago
epoxynous is a great source for seeing just how long this criminal practice has been in the works. his book authors are some of the highest ranking scientists involved in noaa and national weather service. apparently plausible deniability was in the works 50 years ago. rat bastards all.....
DontSprayMeBro 3 years ago 2
What exactly do you think has been going on for 50 years?
Contrails?
Because that's what it looks like.
Epoxynous 3 years ago
you know exactly what has been going on...you and i have been around this block before.
DontSprayMeBro 3 years ago 3
Did you get anywhere?
Chemtrails look like contrails. So chemtrails ARE contrails.
Just contrails - ice clouds. That's it.
Epoxynous 3 years ago
like corn snakes look like corral snakes?
DontSprayMeBro 3 years ago
Actually no, as it's quite easy to tell those snakes apart: "Red touch yellow, kill a fellow
Red touch black, venom lack." (plus other differences).
But what you call "chemtrails", on the other hand, seem to look EXACTLY like contrails. Can you explain the difference?
Epoxynous 3 years ago
you are interesting Epoxynous. you have modified your style somewhat. very subtle and effective i must say...but you know the answers to your queeries so why should we tangle up again. you've got a job to do and you are wasting your time with me...onward to the newbies sergeant, there's debunking to be done!
DontSprayMeBro 3 years ago 2
For example, on your "chemtrail plane having some fun", you show two planes with very normal looking contrails, and you claim they are chemtrails.
Really, how can you tell that these are "chemtrails"? How?
Epoxynous 3 years ago
How can you tell the differences did you witness the event with your own eyes? .Stop making conclusions and ridiculous accusations will ya?
AweSomo84 3 years ago
Soon every one will know , because there pall the tv will tell them , but than it will look like they are trying to save us and that there arn't harmful effect ( right ;) )
Truth will prevail , chemtrails are a fact.
Orgonite is easy to make and can help clear the atmosphere!
peace
AweSomo84 3 years ago
you sick bastards have been experimenting with this shit for years huh?
well it's gonna stop pretty fucking soon.......
DICKcheneyMASTER 3 years ago
I think you miss the point. This is strong evidence that persistent contrails are normal, and have been around since the dawn of aviation.
There are account all the way back to 1921. Obviously nobody has been "spraying" since 1921. It's just contrails, formed from the water vapor in aircraft engine exhaust, which turns to ice at the cold temperatures (-40) found at high altitude.
Epoxynous 3 years ago
your lucidity is appreciated in this mess of conspiracy buffs.. people will see what they want to see
bzor 3 years ago
for everyone still believing its just H2O.. :P
The german military admitted the use of chemicals to create clouds.. these consist of polymers with a series of heavy metals on them.
Theres lots of videos on them.
R4L1989 3 years ago
Lots of videos where they mistranslated the german word "Düppel" (chaff) as "Chemtrails".
If the military admitted anything, then why is there not a link to a web page quoting what the Military said in German?
Look at the German wikipedia page on Düppel.
Epoxynous 3 years ago
The subtitles on the video are very inaccurate and misleading.
unusmultorumm 3 years ago
Yes, I would love to believe that these are just contrails. But, i saw them sprayed the first week of each month since last summer. They were sprayed last week in my area. Funny how the trails I saw were only on one area of the sky covering the sunset, but none anywhere else in the sky. These were sprayed at or around sunset every month. The trails I saw last week were still visible the next morning. They don't go away, they linger..In this case for over 12 hours. Do contrails do that?
pincerpal 4 years ago
Do some time lapse photography of these unusual contrails. You can get a cheap camera. Contrails, and clouds, do not linger unchanged for 12 hours.
How do you know it's the same contrails in the morning. It's probably just that to the west of you is where the planes fly.
Why do you think it only started last summer?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
5 stars for being positive. I hope they are just harmless vapor Contrails.
pincerpal 4 years ago
2 friends, 4 videos...Shill, I say sir.
Last question. People trying to raise awareness to these Chemtrails post videos to raise awareness and possibly save lungs.(good intentions). What drives you to disprove?
1000's of Chemtrail videos and only a handful on your side of the fence.
pincerpal 4 years ago 5
I just find it interesting. People post videos on FAR less interesting subjects.
Do you think these photos are fake? If they are not, then would you change your mind?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
If they are Contrails then what about the samples of Barium and Aluminum found in the fallout? What about the gov. documents? Why so many now, all over the world? What about the photos of the planes with pics of the inside the plane (Tanks and Hoses)? Why are these trails happening on a monthly basis almost on a schedule. I think some of the photos you showed were added they look too clear for the 70's. More questions than answers..
pincerpal 4 years ago 3
1) Ground samples, unconnect to contrails
2) Which? HR2977 was Kuchinch being gullible
3) More planes that are bigger and fly higher.
4) Boeing WD001 test plane. Barrels have water for COG test.
5) Planes fly on schedule, but the contrails depend on the weather at altitude. Keep a journal, then get back to me.
6) The copy of the book I have was printed in 1972. Photography has not advanced that much.
More questions?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
"Persistent contrails were observed in 1921."
What???????? I remember Orville saying to Wilbur "Hey quit spraying me!"
ogrish2 4 years ago 2
Orville and Wilbur were in 1904. The first high altitude flights that produced persistent contrails were around 1920. They were documented in 1921. See the article "Pre WWII Contrails" on contrailscience. com, or google:
Macready contrails
Epoxynous 4 years ago
Seriously, I just can't get over your argument that ALL these people ALL over the world just "don't remember" them.
...even if they lived in highly populated congested areas that have always had heavy air traffic,
nope! according to you, no one looks at the sky and everyone has just gone nuts because of youtube. get real.
janeleone 4 years ago
people don't remember things they did not pay attention to ten years ago.
What about this book then? Photos from before 1972. Look like chemtrails. Do you seriously think it's a fake?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
Could very well be that there was early testing of these systems? I'm not saying I know for sure what these trails are but I lived in New York and Los Angeles and never seen this. I would have noticed.
MoJoSB 4 years ago
The descriptions of persistent spreading contrails are consistent all the way back to first observed one in 1921, which was when planes first got to that altitude. So, no, it's not early testing, it's just contrails.
There are more planes now. But really, why would you remember something you did not pay much attention to. Sure, you might have noticed them - but without them being pointed out as being "chemtrails", why would you remember them? What DO you remember?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
You so NO, like you have proof... You can't do that cause you don't know... I'm speculating and you are spouting FACT... You have no basis to say "So, no, it's not early testing, it's just contrails." That is wrong.
MoJoSB 4 years ago
I don't have proof of the non-existence of a lot of things. Check out my favorite videos and watch "Richard Dawkin's The God Delusion Tea Pot" video.
The accounts of contrails like this go back to 1921. Sure, you can believe things because there is no proof that they are not true - but then how do you choose what to believe. Surely at least the evidence that something MIGHT be true needs to outweigh the evidence that it is not.
So where is the evidence to support "chemtrails"?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
I know all about Dawkins and while agreeing with a lot of what he says, he tends to come off like a dick and arrogant, it's why "unfortunately" he wont reach more people.
My first fact is my eyes. imagine you had a wall and it was hot to the touch. I tell you and you say... Nah, that wall gets hot sometimes on and off. I say, "Well, if there is a short, it could set the house on fire," What would you do? Stick with what you know or have it tested?
MoJoSB 4 years ago
I agree with you about Dawkins, he has an unfortunate manner sometimes.
People would agree that your hot wall was rather unusual. But are spreading contrails unusual? Perhaps they are to you, as you don't remember them. But to scientists, persistent spreading contrails ARE normal.
Which scientists? Try going to Google Scholar, and searching for "persistent contrails"
Epoxynous 4 years ago
I looked up a lot of stuff on Contrails and they don't have all the answers either. Ice Crystals, Sulfur content of the fuel, contrails forming cirrus clouds. All of that is there and by no means does it seem like this is normal. On a lot of papers "More Research needed" was stated.
Something has changed and I want it looked into... Might be as simple as they changed the fuel and it's causing this much more than it used to.
MoJoSB 4 years ago
I added a video of the 1963 book. Check my videos.
Water itself is not fully understood - the way it changes from liquid to solid is incredibly complex. Much of science is simply a very good approximation of how things work. Contrail formation is not perfectly understood, but the basic principals are very well understood. Engines make water, water freezes into clouds, if the air is humid enough then they persist and spread.
Epoxynous 4 years ago
But that is not what was started in about 4 or 5 things I read on Google Scholar... You mentioned of the sulfur amounts in fuel or that they stated that it creates cirrus clouds and we are not talking small ones... Ones that show up on radar.
Also the fact that many seem to think further study is needed. Seems like you just want to prove me wrong, instead of wanted to know what is really happening.
MoJoSB 4 years ago 2
Memories fade, photographs last forever.
unusmultorumm 3 years ago
so....you are saying these giant sometimes checker board patterned, streamers in the sky over and over day after day were always here, we just started noticing them.
wow, that's a load of bullshit that takes leaps and bounds of faith,
are you sure you are an atheist?
disinfo spook.
janeleone 4 years ago
I'm saying YOU just started noticing them. Other people have been noticing them for decades.
Persistent contrails were observed in 1921.
Epoxynous 4 years ago
From a person who knows planes and airports because they were all around me and has always looked at the sky because I lived in a high rise apartment building,
BULLSHIT.
janeleone 4 years ago
...it's at the height of sick that you're convinced I never looked at the sky and just never noticed giant lines all over the place despite the fact there were many airports and crosspaths in the highly populated area I'm from.
I'm curious: How old are you and where are you from?
janeleone 4 years ago
I'm in my 40s, I live in Los Angeles.
Airports are nothing to do with contrails. where did you live before you noticed these persistent contrails?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
LoL...you expect us to believe that chemtrails are clouds when we see them being formed in the sky by planes? How fucken stupid do you really think we are? Take your disinformation BS and shove it where the sun dont shine (and I dont mean where the sun doesn't shine because the chemtrails are covering it up).
Enlightened12 4 years ago
Contrails are clouds formed in the sky by planes. They even have a name for it:
Cirrus aviaticus
Epoxynous 4 years ago
I like how the book is nearly 40 years old yet hasn't even got a crease or mark on it
oliax 4 years ago 2
I guess some people take care of their books.
What, you think it's fake?
Epoxynous 4 years ago
I'm diffenetly going to try find a copy of this book.
Thankyou for taking the time to upload.
Not 100% sure what I think yet, but after I've looked into it more it may changed my mind about Chemtrails.
ChemtrailUK 4 years ago
I'd be interested to hear what you think after seeing the book. The text is very interesting - discussing how the various types of trail form.
Epoxynous 4 years ago
Sounds interesting.
I shall contact you on youtube after I've found the book.
Peace.
ChemtrailUK 4 years ago
There is nothing to suggest that these were unusual. These were just photos of normal contrails in 1972 - just the same as contrails 35 years later.
Epoxynous 4 years ago
te pòxyno!
metti pure un video di com'erano normalmente i cieli, ti va?
could you post a video with the sky we had every day in 1972? or in 1980, or 1990...
Malunah 4 years ago