the advantage in my opinion would be very minimal depending on the experience of each pilot in his aircraft! Apache has more (aiming gun capascete grouped in the pilot that would benefit to the Apache!) do not know if the M-35 has the same TECHNOLOGICAL
@russiarolesLOL, they could upgraded with Shtora-1 and Arena system to decoy incoming manpads. It will probably be heavier, but you'll have far more protection.
@russiarolesLOL Your welcome you commie, and your mighty technology seems a bit obsolete when it can be taken down with something as simple as an infantry launched rocket. Tisk Tisk, all that firepower, time, and money just to be blown apart by something 1/12 its size that any capable soldier can be armed with. I apologize for your comrades but you were fighting for the wrong side. Its also kind of embarrassing that "The Decadent Western Pigs" and their corporations could do it better.
@Suyamu True, but our systems are more modern, up to date, and have state-of-the-art components, they do have their kinds and they sure as hell are expensive but they would stand a better chance then a half asses piece of iron with a rotor on top and missiles slung on the side. Competition creates technological advances, not the pursuit of the common good, have you ever wondered why we have (or at least had till liberal era) the best economy and military in the world?
Russia has more modern helicopters than the Mi-24. Mi-28 and Ka-52 carry all the state of the art electronics you can expect.
Still they all go down when hit by a missile - in fact Russian attack helicopter probably carry heavier armor than western ones and Ka-52 even has ejection seats unlike any western helicopter.
There was always competition, internal as well as competition on the export market.
@Suyamu Just because you can conscript millions of idiots, give them AKs, and throw them into the frontlines like cannon fodder doesn't necessarily mean you are the best, in fact, considering your method, China is the best.
@Suyamu Oh please, don't give me that videogame bullshit, I have seen your tank series and am utterly disappointed, quite frankly your plans seem to revolve around manufacturing an immense load of cheap inexpensive garbage (en mass) then throw it at the enemy with little to no care for the individuals involved, after all, they are expendable. However, I will admit, your Kalashnikova impressed me significantly.
Our "cheap and inexpensive" designs are actually quite robust and do their job very well.
The "just throwing things at the enemy" is again a myth formed from hollywood and videogames.
You have to consider that hollywood was a propaganda instrument during cold war.
Military strategy and tactics were always of big importance for Russia, our military schools still teach many Officers from all around the world. Our instructors and advisors were present in many hotspots.
@Suyamu Not Only the KA-52 has ejection seats. Mil Mi-28 has ejection free fall system.The rotorblades will not blow away but the pilots will eject to site down they have a big matress to lead the pilots far away from rotor blades. And the KA50 has ejections seats to like KA-52. russian build the heaviest armored and armed helicopters and the safest.
a very very good helicopter! Unbelievably quick and agile! but it does lack weapons and range. It is also VERY BIG which makes it easier to shoot down with an RPG when flying at low altitude. Unlike the cobra
A trully awesome helicopter that has evolved quite a lot throught blood and pain in Afghanistan..
Even it looks so heavy and cunversome it works so well that even now with the KA-50 and MI-28 allready functional russians say they still want Hinds arround
I want to see the Hind and Apache face off. Would be an awesome battle, I wonder who would win?
NastyNatey 8 months ago
the advantage in my opinion would be very minimal depending on the experience of each pilot in his aircraft! Apache has more (aiming gun capascete grouped in the pilot that would benefit to the Apache!) do not know if the M-35 has the same TECHNOLOGICAL
Although most of the two are very deadly
fabriciobrisola1 8 months ago
georgian army has also that hellicopter
lashatotladze 1 year ago
What is the diference between the Mi 24 and the Mi 35 if both are clasied as Hind
metalkat77 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is it better than Apache?
asmumy 2 years ago
Amazing weapons platform. Would hate to be on the business end of one of them.
jonesy97 2 years ago
Mil-MI-35 now in Brazilian Air Force =)
fernandorc 2 years ago 11
@fernandorc Só daqui a 5 anos!
zimmermann10 1 year ago
num viaja filho, a cerimonia de recebimento das tres primeiras aeronaves em um total de 12 foi conssagrada no dia 17 de abril.
kaiozus 1 year ago
@kaiozus Não inventa, é preciso preparar trazer todo o ferramental de manuntenção, preparar a sargentada e os pilotos.Não é assim, não criança!!!
zimmermann10 1 year ago
Mil MI-24 is sovietic, but Mil-Mi-35 is Russian =)
thanks for your post.
Regards
fernandorc 2 years ago 2
Soviet, not Russian.
SLAVSnotSLAVES 2 years ago
when the Soviet Union broke up, It become the country of Russia, but russia previously formed part of the Soviet Union.
Borneng95 2 years ago
@Borneng95 STFU!
SLAVSnotSLAVES 2 years ago
fuck you fucking uneducated!!!! no know nothing of world, stupid ideot!!!!
Borneng95 2 years ago
Comment removed
russiarolesLOL 2 years ago 5
dude youre 19! how can you say youve flown with the hind in afghanistan?
LAPA50ty 2 years ago
@russiarolesLOL Your a liar....
hellcatdave1 1 year ago 2
@russiarolesLOL, they could upgraded with Shtora-1 and Arena system to decoy incoming manpads. It will probably be heavier, but you'll have far more protection.
SuperRatchetclank 1 year ago
@russiarolesLOL Your welcome you commie, and your mighty technology seems a bit obsolete when it can be taken down with something as simple as an infantry launched rocket. Tisk Tisk, all that firepower, time, and money just to be blown apart by something 1/12 its size that any capable soldier can be armed with. I apologize for your comrades but you were fighting for the wrong side. Its also kind of embarrassing that "The Decadent Western Pigs" and their corporations could do it better.
davedavedaveannoy1 11 months ago
@davedavedaveannoy1
uh - "infantry launched rockets" can take down western aircraft just as well - that's what they're made for.
Suyamu 8 months ago
@Suyamu True, but our systems are more modern, up to date, and have state-of-the-art components, they do have their kinds and they sure as hell are expensive but they would stand a better chance then a half asses piece of iron with a rotor on top and missiles slung on the side. Competition creates technological advances, not the pursuit of the common good, have you ever wondered why we have (or at least had till liberal era) the best economy and military in the world?
davedavedaveannoy1 8 months ago
@davedavedaveannoy1
Russia has more modern helicopters than the Mi-24. Mi-28 and Ka-52 carry all the state of the art electronics you can expect.
Still they all go down when hit by a missile - in fact Russian attack helicopter probably carry heavier armor than western ones and Ka-52 even has ejection seats unlike any western helicopter.
There was always competition, internal as well as competition on the export market.
Also: We have the best military in the world. :)
Suyamu 8 months ago
@Suyamu Just because you can conscript millions of idiots, give them AKs, and throw them into the frontlines like cannon fodder doesn't necessarily mean you are the best, in fact, considering your method, China is the best.
davedavedaveannoy1 8 months ago
@davedavedaveannoy1
shows what you know of our military.
You should stop substituting history lessons with hollywood movies and videogames.
Suyamu 8 months ago
@Suyamu Oh please, don't give me that videogame bullshit, I have seen your tank series and am utterly disappointed, quite frankly your plans seem to revolve around manufacturing an immense load of cheap inexpensive garbage (en mass) then throw it at the enemy with little to no care for the individuals involved, after all, they are expendable. However, I will admit, your Kalashnikova impressed me significantly.
davedavedaveannoy1 8 months ago
@davedavedaveannoy1
Our "cheap and inexpensive" designs are actually quite robust and do their job very well.
The "just throwing things at the enemy" is again a myth formed from hollywood and videogames.
You have to consider that hollywood was a propaganda instrument during cold war.
Military strategy and tactics were always of big importance for Russia, our military schools still teach many Officers from all around the world. Our instructors and advisors were present in many hotspots.
Suyamu 8 months ago
@Suyamu Not Only the KA-52 has ejection seats. Mil Mi-28 has ejection free fall system.The rotorblades will not blow away but the pilots will eject to site down they have a big matress to lead the pilots far away from rotor blades. And the KA50 has ejections seats to like KA-52. russian build the heaviest armored and armed helicopters and the safest.
Talshet 4 months ago
a very very good helicopter! Unbelievably quick and agile! but it does lack weapons and range. It is also VERY BIG which makes it easier to shoot down with an RPG when flying at low altitude. Unlike the cobra
poyanator 2 years ago 2
difference between mi-24 and mi-35 is that mi-35 is fully modified with western Technology !
RobiMarinko 2 years ago
It's modified for western market, but technology is eastern (Russian)
nikomo37 2 years ago 6
its not mi-24? or there are mi24 and mi35 too? (sry for my english)
gabrocki 2 years ago
Whats the difference betwen mi 24 and mi 35 ?
dimovskigoran 2 years ago
A trully awesome helicopter that has evolved quite a lot throught blood and pain in Afghanistan..
Even it looks so heavy and cunversome it works so well that even now with the KA-50 and MI-28 allready functional russians say they still want Hinds arround
sparrowlt 2 years ago
Mi 28 is much better than the Apache!!!
And the KA 50 or the KA 52 is superrior aginst the Apache!!
Giotiner 3 years ago 2
Really cool helicopter, much better than any other one, including the apache
MI-35 HIND
russiapower345 3 years ago 2
I like it too,its just a huge flying tank that can take a beating and still protect the troops..The US should had copied it I think..lol
americaneagle1967 3 years ago
Peoples,
this video is for demostrate the machine, dont "this better than those" ok.
tks
fernandorc 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Apache "Longbow" IS MORE BETTER LOL
ADELIN90 3 years ago
what a beast.....doesn't have anything on the apache....however the havoc might!
christianhoneywood 4 years ago 3