This guy is a total cunt.. and a stupid one too. Thousands of innocent people also die in wars.. not all victims of war are terrorists you dumb fuckwit.. not only that he tells the guy he sounds like a parakeet.. Has he listened to his own high pitched nasal shrill.
If you are prolife then you are PROLIFE! the name says it all.. What does mark nopt understand.. If the group was innocent life then maybe he would have a point, Then againt he would know what a "kettle of fish" that is... Face it Mark Fans the Man Levin is a fwit... Like all righjt wing nutters he doesnt support Abortion! Why well its very simple Nothing to do with innocent babes.. a lot to do with cheap labour . Fuck you Levin the axe will fall upon your neck.. :-)
@myY0UTUBEchanneI I read your responce and I'm sorry it took me forever so if you give me the name of that video and I shall give you my reveiw of it. P.S. Nothing can make me anti-war. "We make war to keep peace." Aristotle.
@myY0UTUBEchanneI It said, and I don't say it in quote, "You're pro-war? Than watch this video. It changed my mind about Levin." Hope you remember I would love to see a video that challenges my beliefs so I know I won't falter in them.
@sugarlanskee8 They both mean the same thing. We believe that life is precious, I know, how dare us think that. Anti-abort is a negative term to make us sound like we're negative. Pro is positive, that's why the left-wing, liberal media uses the terms pro-choice and anti-choice. Google or Bing image search 'abortion', still anti-life?
Moslems and JC-people are both anti-abort but they generally hate each other and the Moslems do not recognize the humanity of JC-people or the Jews. Religion-people, in the main, have pure disdain for the Animal Rights-Atheists and vice-versa. Anti-Aborts love to bomb clinics, terrorize the children of clinic workers and murder doctors. Anti-Aborts say: 'Lives are sacred as long as they agree with us'. The Anti-Aborts thrive on hate.
@sugarlanskee8 It's spelled muslim, and yes, I do have distaste for Islam. Only extreme EXTREME people attack abortion clinics. Tell me, of what religion are you? If it's evolution, it's still a religion. Since when do animals have rights? I know that there is no way punching an animal that is not attacking is okay, but seriously? They're just dumb animals for us to eat, hunt, or keep as pets.
Anti-Aborts are almost always RCC, Fundie, Moslem or other religion which need more and more peoples 'feeding the plate'. Anti-Aborts loathe anyone who disagrees with them and do not even believe they are human, are pro-their-own-lives but not anybody else's.
Then, why are you an anti-abort? Are you an ultra-Humanist who says the more people the better? My happen to be Animal Rights-Atheist but the A/R part of it is what counts.
People are so stupid- Exodus 21:24, 2 Thessalonians 1:6, 6th commandment...come on...If someone walked up to me a said "Joshua Komisarjevsky and Steven Hayes should be allowed to live" I'd spit in their face and probably beat the crap outta whoever said that. People have nothing but contempt for the unborn and love the criminals.
@refuckulate420 Excuse me, you are the moron. Of course innocents get killed in war. Innocents got killed in WWII. When the allies bombed Dresden, who do you think they were bombing, Gestapo generals? They were fighting the German people, and they were trying to break their will, and they did! So what's your point, that they shouldn't have fought Germany? If they hadn't, tens of millions more would have died. When you grow up, you have to learn about something called the greater good. Idiot.
WW2 was probably the last justified war we fought, in which case the death of innocents can't be avoided. But wars like Afghanistan and Iraq which have proven to be uneccessary wastes are often supported by a lot of people who claim to be pro-life. It's really quite hypocritical.
Terrorism is a tactic and a tool of military and political action. Going on "evil terroists" blah blah blah just makes you look an absolute tool. The american revolutionarys were terrorists, the French reisistance were terrorists, the Mujahideen were terrorists. And their not regarded as evil.
@aaronharms123456 you are really a dumb idiot, you ought to know that alright. How on hell you are comparing people who have died for you to be free and spew your ignorance to terrorists who want to kill you just cause you are from the west or don't submit to islam and sharia law. Retard, Retard. You have your right to express your dumb not well thought out remarks and i have mine, You are dumbass of the rawest quality.
what about killing civilians and american soldiers, which is what happens when you are pro war? and to actually think that we are "killing terrorists" is a failure in your brain
My recent post somehow didn't print my opening. Please add: "Shades of 1984 and double-speak! Both pro-life and pro-choice are positive-image" [terms. etc.]
terms. Pro-life basically means anti-abortion, and was later expanded to include all that supports life (which doesn't include what destroys it). Pro-choice meant pro-abortion (and not choices they don't approve of). The caller fell into double-speak by taking "pro-life" to mean absolute non-killing, even of terrorists, dealers in genocide, and destroyers if innocent lives). You'd have to go a long way to find a pro-lifer who means this.
They want those babies to come out, but then they don't care what happens to them afterward. WTF is that? I'm not pro abortion nor anti, because I feel that if a woman gets pregnant after being raped, or that the baby is a product of incest. There's really no black & white positions in these polar opposite beliefs, but shades of grey. Let those kids emerge from the womb & then send them off to war to be killed or maimed for life. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.
@lonelyheroine You just made a straw man argument. Pro-lifers don't say after babies come out we don't care for them. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Think before you post!!!
@Cj5316 I wasn't referring to ALL people. Perhaps I should have been clearer. Look, I made a conscious effort not to have kids. It would have been extremely selfish of me, because he or she would have undoubtedly ended up in foster care or worse. Not to mention taking the real risk of having one or all of them inherit my bi-polar genes. Having said that, if I had found myself pregnant, I would not make the choice of aborting it. Meaning I would put my beliefs first & doom my kid forever.
@lonelyheroine What are you talking about? ALL people? I'm talking about your comment on Pro Lifers in relation to the video. Let me re-state, Pro Life people are not for killing innocent people in the womb. If a person rapes and then kills, I feel someone could make a legitimate argument for the death penalty, or if terrorists are trying to kill innocent lives, should we go after them and kill them? I would say so.
sudden judgment coming where the Lord will turn everything upside down. God always moves in judgment when the cup of violence overflows. Sexual crimes against children, Homosexual ,(( Abortion)), Greed and Corruption. I LOVE America, BUT America is a toilet bowl. There are kidnappings in broad daylight right on the streets of America AND ALL OF THIS will bring
about sudden destruction that will change the world in one hour.
I love Mark Levin, I get so furious reading these comments by you morons and then I replay the video.... and I'm happy again :) If there is even 1 person like mark in this world for every 100 of you drones, well be alright :)
Republicans want: No Social Security No Public Education No Regulated Banking No Medicare No Healthcare No Regulations for Wall Street No Regulations for Insurance No Tax to the Rich who make wealth by plunder of the poor No Regulation of private business, all free trade No environmental protection, so you can cut anyway you want , pollute anyway you can Republican want: All Plunder, Extortion, Scam, Feudalism, Anarchy and Capitalism for Crooks and Criminals.
@superwhiz88 Democrats want: excessive taxes, no QUALITY public education, union goon control of everything, beaurocratic healthcare, excessive povery, excessive regulation on job creators, pandering to radical islamist freaks, political corectness, abortion, false global warming theories, hatred towards american way of life, regulate all and everything you can, take however much taxpayer money you want. All government, no competition, no state rights, socialism from bloated beaurocrats.
@Texfield91 by "beaurocratic healthcare you mean NHS? (which every other developed country has), and by regulating "job creators" you must mean the bums on Wall Street, and by "false global warming theories" you mean that you are scientifically illiterate and listen to anything FOX(funded by oil revenues) tells you, and by "socialism" you must mean that you just don't fucking understand what socialism is... I'm an independent so I'm not a democrat, I just thought u should know how retarded u are
@Texfield91 U are close minded person that only watch fox news..and live ur life in azz crack of republscum agenda. i dont want to waste time debate u .. why cause u are an retard.. just do an comparison wealth of Republican state and liberal state.. why is liberal state are so much richer, and conservative state are poor , because Conservative state only depend on few big corporate for their entire state income .. while libreral state have better education , health care,, roads , older care
@Texfield91 second .. corporate in conservative state don't pay no taxes.. they only use infrastructure .. that you and i pay.. is this fair.. they guy have 1000 trucks that ride the road that you and i build.. is that fair Exxon mobile don't pay taxes , is that fair Holliburton don't pay taxes ,, is that fair royal Caribbean don't pay taxes.. while they use our infrastructure.. these companies simply register their company in small island ... this is what republscum call fair..
save the fetus.. but you don't want to support them after then come out.. cut their health benefit , cut on low income housing , cut on education ,,cut on food stamps .. yet you support keep shting them out.. so we can dump them in the street to be bums so they can come back rob us twenty years later ..
most pro lifers really arent .....they are simply anti abortion. they support a war where thousands of innocent ppl are killed by our armed forces everyday and they rejoice at this fact, but when a womans life is on the line or gets raped and ahs to make the hardest choice the call her a murderer. the real murderers are those who rejoice when people die....esp over this phony war in iraq.
Neural cells in the brain and spinal cord that have been damaged can be replaced by stem cells. In cancer, cells destroyed by radiation or chemo can be replaced with new healthy stem cells that adapt to the affected area, whether it be part of the brain, heart, liver, lungs, or wherever. Dead cells of almost ANY kind, no matter the type of injury or disease, can be replaced with new healthy cells because of the amazing flexibility of stem cells. Drugs can't do that.
The pharmaceutical industry brings a lot of dollars (particularly for the ones who produce the drugs) but it is also killing Americans at an alarming rate. Do a little research on how many drugs are banned, how many lawsuits are filed and WON, etc. Drugs are killing us, believe me I know.
The FDA is full of former heads of these big pharmaceutical companies. Why? Because they all work together. Not in OUR best interest but in the best interest of PROFIT...not health.
Mark has been to the Kool-Aid kegger. People, we aren't just killing terrorists we are killing MANY civilians, innocent people including children, babies and pregnant women. Making excuses for civilian casualties is hypocritical and no different than making excuses for abortion. If you value INNOCENT LIFE then PROTEST WAR because innocent people (including babies) get killed in every single one of them. More Americans have died in this war than "they" killed on 9/11. What a brilliant solution.
I agree with a lot of what you are saying, I am pro-life and I don't see how we can justify civilian casualties, yes I do think there is a time for war, but we have to go about it properly and not bomb entire cities. I o support the death penalty because the person is a murderer and we cannot risk them escaping or orchestrating more crime behind bars. They deprived someone of life, they are not innocent.
I feel the same way. I am for the death penalty when significant involvement in the crime has been proven without a doubt. I'm for getting the true evil doers off the planet. My issue is all of the fake "do gooders" who go around claiming to be pro-life yet support war or any activity that takes innocent lives, born or unborn. I wish Pro-Lifers would have a little more concern for those who have already been born. Their concern seems to fade once they are already here.
No kidding. I am no longer in the Republican party because of Neocons like him. I try to go around and explain to "Conservatives" why people like him are not one.
If you so called Tea Party members and Republicans are serious about limited government then you should support ending the Fed, bringing home our troops 865 military bases in 130 countries, ending the silly war on drugs that has cost hundreds of billions of dollars, etc. That is a true conservative position in my mind...
I agree with you 100%. They are all for spending as long it is for their own personal agenda. No Tea Parties while Bush was spending (and losing) trillions. Not a peep from them when Rumsfeld was interviewed the day before 9/11 and he admitted to 2 trillion dollars being "missing". Then the WTC came down the next day along with the accounting dept at the Pentagon. Yeah, I guess it was all just a big coincidence. ;) Can you imagine is 2 trillion went "missing" under a Democrat??
I grew up in a Republican household and was one until Rush Limbaugh disgusted me enough to reconsider supporting any such animal. I think these people are dangerous and they are heading our country toward another civil war. Glenn Beck needs to be locked up for what he is doing. And Mark Levin is an absolute disgrace.
I agree 100 percent. I am a Libertarian, I have no problem with them calling Obama out for his out of control spending and Unconstitutional acts because I think he deserves it. With that said, I want people to be consistent. Where were they when Bush shredded the 4th amendment, torturing, Paulson lying under oath and getting TARP under false pretenses and passing the money out to his Goldman Sach buddies? I just want people to strip away the R and D and hold ALL people accountable.
Both parties disgust me but in different ways. But the hypocrisy from the right is nauseating. Where the heck was the Tea Party when Bush was spending like a maniac? They NEVER seem concerned about spending as long as it is a Republican doing the spending. This is what I can't tolerate. If you hate the spending, then get upset with EVERYONE who is overspending, not just a certain party. I would have a lot more respect for them if they were more consistent in their views.
@christiTN do you watch the news? 99% of the civilians killed in Iraq or Afghanistan is committed by suicide bombing terrorists. it is the equivalent of saying "look at how many jews the allied armies killed during WWII"
Do you actually believe the reports on the news? If they were so accurate, why would there be a need for WikiLeaks? You are very gullible and naive if you believe what is reported on the news about the war. Obviously you have never been over there or you do not know anyone who has if you actually believe that civilians are not being killed by the US. There are even videos of it right here on YouTube. I'm amazed at how many people trust everything the government tells them.
I agree with you. My point about oil is that it is more about oil than getting terrorists. And its more about oil than "bringing democracy" to anyone or the multitudes of other lies and excuses that have been stated about why we are there. If you look at how much money has passed hands to get TO the oil over there, it is obvious that a lot of it has to do with oil. The destroying a culture and people part has to do with gaining control of a land that is drenched in oil, IMHO.
@appleman1324 I dont wish to shoot you down but Was the collateral murder video not proven to be edited in favor of wikileaks ?
Again I dont wish to shoot you down but do you mean 1,000,000 scince 2003 ? as Iraq body count puts the figure near 100,000 and most other stats do not estimate above 200,000.
@spetsnaz4656 actually, wikileaks released the video "collateral murder". doesn't matter, they exposed many fields of our government, but they were part of a setup and conspiracy to continue and endorse censorship on internet sites.
the "100,000" death toll was endorsed by mainstream media, specifically targeting death by terrorist attacks, but there are the food and depletion of water supplies through uranium, a chemical warfare that resulted in over a million deaths
@appleman1324 Thanks for your prompt reply as it prompted some interesting reading. Please look at the above link, as I personally tend to disagree with the DU arguement firstly myself and my collagues handle it, and none of us have ever developed any health problems, secondly as far as i am aware DU is not a chemical agent and could not be used in chemical warfare.
@christiTN So what dumbass you expect us to just sit back and take our citizens getting killed by the these freaks? They declared war on us thats why we went in... And all the innocent life you speak of is at the mecry of those monkeys with bombs strapped to their chests... You dont even take into account how many lives we have saved by taking these guys out, our brave troops out there right now understand that, thats why they fight. God Bless em...
You are very naive and believe what the gov't and the news tell you. You must not know anyone who has been over there and is willing to discuss what actually takes place. You could at least get on YT and look at the videos that show SOME of the Americans killing civilians for fun. They actually yell "woo hoo" and laugh while they are killing civilians walking down the street. MOST are disgusted by being ordered to kill civilians though. But we ARE killing civilians and children.
You don't even understand why we are really there. Do you actually think we would be unable to locate Bin Laden after 10 years? Do you think they are that much smarter than us? That they could hide him for this long? If they are able to do that then they have outsmarted us yet AGAIN. The terrorists we should fear LIVE HERE. NEWSFLASH: The people who flew those planes on 9/11 were LIVING HERE not THERE. Any lives that have been saved is because of what we have done HERE not THERE.
@christiTN I dont think you can say living in a little cave eating crickets if hes even alive can be called outsmarting us, I know there could have been and probably were other agendas for going in besides the little turd bin laden but killing a nut job overthere just saves us the time of waiting for him to fly a plain over here and risk us not getting him before he detonates. When someone attacks your country you dont just sit back and wait for em to come into your territory, thats just stupid
There have been hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed because of the war there so that point is moot. You must not have read the Downing Street memo's yet (which I recommend you do). Do your investigation before you trust your government to send people to war. Everyone knows the reasons why we are bombing Libya now are even more absurd considering we could be using the same justifications on about 15 different countries.
This is hilarious! Statist/liberal sheep can't defend the nonsense they believe. They can only criticize and attack those of us on the right; usually on the most snarky, personal, petty level.
Pregnant women are being killed in war you stupid, freaking idiots. Since you don't seem to care about the innocent men, women and CHILDREN who are killed or disfigured in war, I feel the need to let your little brains know that pregnant women are being blown to smithereens while we attempt to kill terrorists. Conservative morons never cease to amaze me. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people die in war. You think only those who sign up for the military are dying. Morons.
Pregnant women are being killed in war you stupid, freaking idiots. Since you don't seem to care about the innocent men, women and CHILDREN who are killed or disfigured in war, I feel the need to let your little brains know that pregnant women are being blown to smithereens while we attempt to kill terrorists. Conservative morons never cease to amaze me. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people die in war. You act like only those who sign up for the military are dying. Morons.
@christiTN While innocents do get killed in war, a lot more would get killed (especially our citizens) if we didn't go to war to stop these people, primarily the terrorists.
Could you please explain how being in Iraq and Afghanistan is going to stop terrorism? Do you think that terrorists are going to be too "scared" to kill people? Umm, they fly airplanes into buildings, blow themselves up and set themselves on fire. These are not people who are going change their mind because of a few bombs and bullets. We are making them ANGRIER and MORE determined to harm us by killing non-terrorists (which is mostly who we are killing) in their country. L-O-G-I-C
@christiTN Let me get my views straightened out a bit more. I believe in going to war to stop people like Hitler when it is necessary, but I do not believe that the whole war in Iraq is justifiable. Since the terrorists are not a country/army, we should not have handled it by sending in troops which, as you said, would kill a lot more innocents than the terrorists would (not counting our citizens). Personally, I think we should have fought using a guerrilla group, instead of an entire army.
I totally agree. I am impressed by the fact that you are open minded and not defensive. Very refreshing change for YouTube! I agree, some wars have to be fought, like with Germany, because you can't just stand by and let millions of people be slaughtered. But people are still being slaughtered today but we are not invading those countries. You are right, terrorists are NOT a country, army or religion, they are a specific group. Americans have been deceived to think otherwise.
But should that stop us from striving for a better world by getting rid of the guys who make it worse? Would you rather us just step aside and watch madmen terrorists wreak havoc on the rest of the world?
If you did use logic, you would see that if we didn't engage these terrorists, innocent people would still be dying. Yes, innocents have fallen during the cross fire, but it'd be no different if we stood by watching. The terrorists target the civilians, we don't. Big difference.
Here is another way for you to look at what we are doing:
A man kills a police officer. He is armed and hiding at someone's house but the police don't know which one but they know the general area. So, they go through the neighborhood, house by house, shooting anything that moves just in case it is him. And while they are shooting up his neighborhood, the killer quietly leaves and moves to another country and masterminds the greatest terror attack in history out of revenge.
First of all, your example makes no sense. Police officers don't go through neighborhoods shooting whatever they see just in case it is him. They would go through a thorough search of the neighborhood to find him, and then they would only shoot him if he was threatening an innocent civilian or another police officer.
Yes, you are correct. This is how criminals should be dealt with...which is how we should be handling terrorists. That was my point, sugar. Terrorists are killers and should be punished. But it is NO DIFFERENT to kill civilians in Iraq while we look for a killer than it is to kill innocent people HERE while we look for a killer. The difference is those "civilians" aren't AMERICAN so the we do not care. And these pro-war hypocrites call themselves "Pro-Life". WTF ever.
First of all, I'm not your sugar. I'd like the mutual respect that I have given you.
Second, that is what we have done. Since we have been over seas we have killed and caught several terrorists. Terrorists have been killing innocents before we got there, they haven't stopped since we've been there, and if we just pulled back now do you think they would stop? The terrorists are the ones who have been killing innocents intentionally. That is their goal, to create terror. We are not
Secondly, yes civilians have fallen victim to terrible acts done by U.S. soldiers, and for them there is no excuse. But, the actual number of these occurances are slim compared to what actually takes place most of the time. When it does occur, heavy consequences are brought down on them. The objective of the military is to engage the enemy, and do whatever it can to also avoid the loss of civilian life. Which is pretty hard to do considering most of the time the enemy is normally
Oh, and PS, do you actually think civilians aren't being targeted? Have you not tuned in to all the videos on YouTube of US soldiers "woo-hooing" while they shoot civilians? It is documented on video. HAVING FUN shooting civilians. They shoot pregnant women and blow up weddings.They rape young girls and set their home and family on fire to hide the evidence. Look up Steven Green. Do you know how much evidence has to exist for someone in the military to actually go to prison?
among civilians and dressed like civilians. There are even rules of engagement that prevent soldiers from shooting unless they are shot at first. Civilians have died and its terrible, it really is. But its not because the U.S. targets them.
Your comparison of the situation in the middle east to your story carries no weight first of all. Secondly, should the police not pursue the man who killed the police officer? No! They would and they should cause its the just thing to do.
I suspect you are very young so I see no need to continue this "debate". Its pointless and like challenging an armless person to a tennis match. Its an unfair game and no challenge for me even if you give it your all. So, therefore I must say...stay in school, go to college, open your mind, do not follow the sheep, do not trust the government or religion, respect authority but challenge it, think outside the box, break the mold and bend the rules. And tell 'em Christi sent ya.
Yes, I am young! I'm 18. But I think it's funny that you'd dismiss my argument because of my age. I don't need any advice from someone who can't even think of a sensible argument (i.e. your police story). I have stayed in school, I am going to college, I don't follow the sheep and trust government like the rest of my generation who thinks Obama rocks just because he tells us to have hope, and I am a Christian!! Don't give me any life advice via youtube pal.
@christiTN Can you please explain to me what's "their" country? What country does the Taliban represent? What country did "they" die for on 9/11. Oh wait you can't answer that question because there IS no fucking answer. These terrorists will and have been killing people from Iraq, Afghanistan, YOU FUCKING NAME IT as long as the person doesn't share the same RELIGIOUS view with them- THEY'LL FUCKING KILL ANYBODY they consider an infidel- reguardless of their damn nationality. Now read me out-
You are exactly right. Terrorists will always exist and they will always kill....we can't change that. Soooooo, why are we sending our own people to die to fight a group of people that can never be stopped? Anyone reading this: TERRORISM CAN NEVER, EVER BE STOPPED. Not EVER. Not NOW and not in the future. It is an impossibility. When I refer to "their" country....uhhhh, I mean the ones our freaking soldiers are fighting in right now, duh. This is not the EARTH war...YET.
@christiTN no no no no no no you didn't catch my message.. or maybe i didn't explain in right.. IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN and EVERY COUNTRY IN WHICH TERRORISM RESIDES should be fighting the terrorism themself, and if you fight it CORRECTLY- then the terrorism doesn't expand into another country because they're too busy fighting the country they were brought up in. and for MANY years the middle east has failed to do it that is why the Taliban is even threatening and have attacked us in the first place
Of course they should be fighting it themselves, jeez. Does anyone on the planet not actually know this? Why the heck do you think I'm upset over sending our troops over there to fight a battle they should be fighting themselves? I have stated that we need our military HERE protecting our own country. It is obvious our military defense is seriously lacking as demonstrated on 9/11. There is no excuse for the Pentagon being hit, they had more than enough time to stop it.
@christiTN How the heck is the 9/11 attacks a lack of "military defense" it was the AIRPORT SECURITY that FAILED to prevent terrorists from even getting on the plane in the first place. Now I just like you and pretty any sane person, does not like to hear on the news about anybody in the military getting killed.. but this Taliban we know of has existed for MANY years and the middle-eastern countries have FAILED to stop them and we have every right to be anywhere in the MIddle East fighting them
Jesus Freaking Christ, are you not even aware that our military is on stand by to shoot down any foreign or unidentified missile that enters our airspace? That includes a God Blessed plane. A plane that makes a 180 and starts heading for the freaking PENTAGON after two planes "attacked" the WTC should have been blown to smithereens long before it even got anywhere close. If it takes this long to shoot down a plane, how do you think they will handle a missile out of nowhere?
When did your comments suggest you didn't know our miitary was on stand by?
Right here: "How the heck is the 9/11 attacks a lack of "military defense"
Anybody with ANY knowledge in this area at ALL would know what a TREMENDOUS error this was on the part of our government and military to allow a hijacked plane to arrive at the Pentagon with THAT much notice. Trillions of dollars for the military and this is the best we can do? Oh yeah, GREAT security we have over here.
@christiTN lol I'll say it again.. It was the AIRPORT SECURITY'S JOB TO MAKE SURE A TERRORIST DOESN'T GET ON A US AIRPLANE IN THE FIRST PLACE. But yes I agree the military should have known immediately where the plane was going and as soon as the communications were disrupted and the planes went off course they should have been immediately blown to pieces
LOL, it is the government's place to set airport standards.You can't blame airport security without blaming the government. Not sure if you know this or not but this wasn't the first time a terrorist boarded a plane. The government was fully aware that this was a threat and has been for many years. Why didn't they secure the problem? They had been put on notice of the threat of airplane attacks and had practice drills. Yet the terrorists still outsmarted our gov't. Feel safe?
@christiTN well yeah i fly like 3 times a year to see my dad. ever since 9/11 theyve beefed up the security a crap load. and no I actually thought that the airport security wasnt military lol idk y. but thanks for informing me
But the government and the military are sort of the same. Different but the same. Air traffic controllers aren't just making sure vacationers get to their destination on time. Naturally our military is going to be notified anytime a commercial airliner appears to be going way off course and heading toward the Pentagon. Military involvement starts at that moment as it well should. The military isn't patrolling airports but they sure better be ready if something is amiss.
@christiTN Please forgive me if I sound pissed at you, I don't blame you for something you don't understand, it's just that your way of thinking seems to be everybody's- and it's quite frankly overwhelming. And there is obviously NOTHING wrong with being concerned for anybody's innocent life. But see this terrorist group you refer to is the Taliban- "duh" I know you're thinking- and where they are brought up-the Middle-East- ones allegiance is to their family, religion, THEN leader-THAT ORDER.
Actually, yes, I agree. Both sides are willing to die for what they believe in. I've been saying that for many years. But you don't know that because you've only read a couple of my posts on YouTube. The difference is that many people join the military for a job or an education and they don't really want to fight in a war EVER and they are playing the odds that they won't have to ever go. And when I think about them losing their lives for a war based on lies, it sickens me.
@christiTN well firtst off forgive me for assuming you weren't clear on whats going on but believe a lot of people aren't clear. Well then i think that's a problem don't you? "many people join the military for a job or an education and they don't really want to fight in a war EVER and they are playing the odds that they won't have to ever go" sad thing is you're right and I personally dont thin they d=should take that chance if they don't want to sacrifice themself.
You know what, it is not my place to judge why anyone joins the military. I haven't been in a position of not being able to get an education or a job. I haven't walked in their shoes. I can't say "it was stupid to join the military if you didn't want to go to war" because that is apparent. People who get on a plane don't expect it to crash but it happens. Should we say they shouldn't have taken the chance if they weren't willing to die? We all know planes can crash.
@christiTN umm no.. see the military- or atleast from what I understand- is a service of our government, in which young men and women join and knowingly put their country before THEMSELF, and put their country BEFORE the benefits they may acquire such as an education. And by all means I believe that I have the right to say it is not a great idea to join something that you don't particulary believe in, personally for self-benefits.
You can say whatever you want, just like I can say you are an idiot for getting in a plane and then crying as it crashes. You knew it was a possibility. These kids are just that - kids. Do you actually think an 18 year old is capable of fully understanding what he/she is doing when they join the military? They are brainwashed by our government and military leaders to BELIEVE they should put their country first. This happens AFTER they join the military, not before.
Are you really this naive? Do you not realize that people do all sorts of things that they do not particularly believe in for INCOME and benefits? It happens all day, every day, in every walk of life. Look at all the crap jobs people do all over this planet that they do not really want to be doing because they need or want the paycheck. You have the right to say anything you want but you are putting human behavior into far too simplistic terms. Where do you live, Utopia?
Wait, I think I figured it out. You are asking how is it that I know something they do not? Well, it has to do with being on the planet for 44 years vs only 18. It has to do with having an advanced education which is something they haven't had a chance to receive yet. There is a vast difference between ignorance and stupidity. Who said they are stupid? You can be ignorant of a subject yet still be an intelligent person. You can gain knowledge but sometimes its too late.
@christiTN by the way im 17 and I'm considering joining the Airforce and completely understand that my life will be at risk and im not gonna do it for any benefits or MONEY and it's not anybodys fault but their own to join something like the military and doing it souly for MONEY or the education they couldnt get in the college they could have got a scholarship from doing well in school
@christiTN no see this is why i think you're the idiot because your comparing JOINING THE MILITARY to A CIVILIAN GETTING ON A FUCKING PALNE AND HOPING IT DOESN'T CRASH. See EVERYBODY- even the "stupid and pre-brainwashed 18 year olds" you say to be who join the military know or SHOULD know that joining ANY branch in the military is always a sacrifice by being ready to serve their country when called upon and UNDERSTAND that they would risk their life for people of our country b4 brainwash begins
Are you even 18 years old? Listen, this is just silly and I'm not going to waste any more time on this nonsense. I tried to entertain you with your "enlightening" information about terrorism. What, did you just Google that before getting on YouTube or something? Feel as though you had come to this big conclusion about the Taliban and you wanted to educate someone? Alrighty then. Sugar, you picked the wrong person. Better luck next time. I'm going to bed now.
@christiTN no sir, I am 17 therefore I am not 18. And no, all of the knowledge I have and was TRYING to help you understand about the war on terrorism came from my dad. Not trying to boast- but my dad's been in the Marine Corps for 31 years and he's been over seas fighting twice and he told me everything about it but then again- me and you both know that he is in the military so he is brainwashed as am I and we are dillusionists who have no clue how the world works. You win, God bless you , nite
Look, I know you mean well. And I do want to say I'm impressed with the fact that you KNOW about how terrorism works, most people do not. And I'm sorry for saying anything that was insulting to you or your dad. You just started out with this arrogance, saying "I know you just don't understand the Taliban" without even taking the time to find out what I did or did not know. YOU were assuming I did not know how the world works...so that is one finger you really can't point.
@christiTN well you what you're right. and i admit shouldnt have just assumed anything about you just because of a couple comments. or actually one.. idk. It's just i always hear people protest the war and they go on and it bugs how little they actually know about it. you are different though honestly... first one ive came across who gets it
I feel the same about you. I respect you. So many people are pro-war without even knowing why. You are doing your homework and you aren't screaming and cussing and acting like a psycho. I think you are a smart kid. And I'm sorry we didn't hit it off on the right foot.
Sorry, I posted the next to last comment before I got your kind response. Otherwise I would have worded it differently. I'm sure you are fully aware that terrorists have boarded airplanes before. Sorry for being a smart ass.
@christiTN well hey I respect you too and whats sad is that our parties in our government cant even respect eachother. and yeah lol probably not the right foot but, hey, what's it matter now
Hey, we have even more in common....our political parties not respecting each other is one of my greatest pet peeves in life. Always pointing a finger but never at themselves.
@christiTN oh alright thanks for explaining that. and yeah no kidding how the heck can we get anything done when we have these high-egoed politicians so worried about not being wrong than getting anything done for the country? it's always been annoying to to me
@christiTN Note how religion comes before leader, and what this suggests is the encouragement for one to have such extremist views on their religion. Therefore the Taliban- considers all those who's religion doesn't line up to their own to be an "infidel" must die at any cost- even sacrificing their own life, because their religion is greater than their life itself. SOUND FAMILIAR? Like how those in OUR military joined to sacrifice THEIR life because our country is greater than our life itself?
@christiTN Okay so the Taliban erose in the Middle-East and they've been fighting the "infidels" for many, many, many years. Despite this "terrorism" exists in EVERY country, and it is the duty for that particular country to fight it's own terrorism itself. Now the problem with the Taliban is that in the Middle-East the allegiance is more towards what good for each individuals family and religion more than what's good for their own country-It's completely different mindset and hard to understand
I actually completely understand the situation. And I will never change my opinion about this war. We just shouldn't be over there, plain & simple. Its not going to change anything and we can't eradicate all terrorists all over the globe. They are everywhere and they are probably our neighbors. They don't go around wearing Turbans. They blend into society. That's how they get on planes and fly them into buildings. I'm sort of tired of discussing this also.
@christiTN Which explains why so many people are opposed to this war and nobody really know what's even happening or who we are exactly fighting. So many people mainly in the US believe we are fight Iraqies in Iraq and Afghanies in Afghanistan and what they don't understand is that these terrorists and insurgents are from everywhere and could care less of their own nationality. See what our troops are doing.. or should I say trying to do is help stabilize a democracy- NOTHING LIKE OURS- but...
@christiTN a democracy that would be able to set up its own military, police force, etc. so THEY can fight terrorist groups like the Taliban. And if the Taliban and a stabilized democracy in the Middle-East are fighting eachother... who are they not trying to attack?.. get it?? This can also work like the "dominoe-theory"-one country falls to commusim,it's neighbor does too/One country becomes Democracy/It's neighbor does too. I'm NOT saying it will work and I'm NOT saying it won't.
@christiTN so i guess we just ignore al qaeda and then they will leave us alone? we tried that, and look what it got us: the 93 bombing of the WTC, 2 of our embassies in africa blown to hell in 98, and the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. we are not trying to "scare" them. we are trying to KILL them.
Do you actually think that terrorism can be stopped? Do you not realize that they are spread out all over the planet? Do you really think that people who can outsmart the US government, military and TSA on 9/11 are just going to stay put in an area where they are known to be? Do grown adults actually believe this? I just will never understand this level of thinking. We can't even locate Bin Laden after a decade yet people have faith that we are "getting the terrorists". Sheesh.
I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians who have been killed are resting easier now that it's been revealed by Mark Levin that they were all just "terrorists." Isn't this guy a lawyer? And he can't do better than just the basest form of sarcasm at the beginning, telling the caller "oh, you're so smart! It must be bad to kill terrorists hurr hurr"
Mark is right on here. We are pro-INNOCENT life. This caller is capable of understanding the difference, he just won't because it's politically inconvenient for him. There is a law higher than man's and he needs to understand that.
The libs think they're smart by trying to compare saving innocent babies from being torn apart in the womb to killing terrorists and mass murderers on death row. Amazing.
Neocons like Levin make me sick. He has some things right, but why continue to back 2 fraudulent wars? Over a million people dead in Iraq since we started that war for WMD's that of course weren't there.
What a dickhead Levin is. Just talk over people, overpower them with stupidity and voila, you're right everytime. Any idiot still defending this Iraq war bullshit it just that, an idiot. And Obama is Bush with an afro, and he keeps piling on debt along with not living up to the promises of getting us out of Iaq and Afghanistan. This country is screwd big time
The doctor didn't go around soliciting women for abortions. These women make that choice freely. I know you conservative idiots don't understand the concept of choice but that's how it works. We make choices and then we live with those choices. That woman who makes that choice has no culpability to you because you want to hate a doctor who can more easily be made a vill
This guy is a total cunt.. and a stupid one too. Thousands of innocent people also die in wars.. not all victims of war are terrorists you dumb fuckwit.. not only that he tells the guy he sounds like a parakeet.. Has he listened to his own high pitched nasal shrill.
johant23 1 week ago
Mark Levin is a piece of shit.
randyjones1988 3 weeks ago
If you are prolife then you are PROLIFE! the name says it all.. What does mark nopt understand.. If the group was innocent life then maybe he would have a point, Then againt he would know what a "kettle of fish" that is... Face it Mark Fans the Man Levin is a fwit... Like all righjt wing nutters he doesnt support Abortion! Why well its very simple Nothing to do with innocent babes.. a lot to do with cheap labour . Fuck you Levin the axe will fall upon your neck.. :-)
whiskasalpha 3 months ago
The guy didn't even have a point! He kept switching from pro-life and pro-war to pro-choice and against war. Idiot.
GrimmThePhantom 4 months ago
Comment removed
myY0UTUBEchanneI 3 months ago
@myY0UTUBEchanneI I read your responce and I'm sorry it took me forever so if you give me the name of that video and I shall give you my reveiw of it. P.S. Nothing can make me anti-war. "We make war to keep peace." Aristotle.
GrimmThePhantom 2 months ago
@GrimmThePhantom my comment was removed. what did i say?
myY0UTUBEchanneI 2 months ago
@myY0UTUBEchanneI It said, and I don't say it in quote, "You're pro-war? Than watch this video. It changed my mind about Levin." Hope you remember I would love to see a video that challenges my beliefs so I know I won't falter in them.
GrimmThePhantom 2 months ago
@GrimmThePhantom
Anti-Aborts are not pro-anything--they are anti-aborts.
sugarlanskee8 1 month ago
@sugarlanskee8 They both mean the same thing. We believe that life is precious, I know, how dare us think that. Anti-abort is a negative term to make us sound like we're negative. Pro is positive, that's why the left-wing, liberal media uses the terms pro-choice and anti-choice. Google or Bing image search 'abortion', still anti-life?
GrimmThePhantom 1 month ago
@GrimmThePhantom
Moslems and JC-people are both anti-abort but they generally hate each other and the Moslems do not recognize the humanity of JC-people or the Jews. Religion-people, in the main, have pure disdain for the Animal Rights-Atheists and vice-versa. Anti-Aborts love to bomb clinics, terrorize the children of clinic workers and murder doctors. Anti-Aborts say: 'Lives are sacred as long as they agree with us'. The Anti-Aborts thrive on hate.
sugarlanskee8 1 month ago
@sugarlanskee8 It's spelled muslim, and yes, I do have distaste for Islam. Only extreme EXTREME people attack abortion clinics. Tell me, of what religion are you? If it's evolution, it's still a religion. Since when do animals have rights? I know that there is no way punching an animal that is not attacking is okay, but seriously? They're just dumb animals for us to eat, hunt, or keep as pets.
GrimmThePhantom 1 month ago
@sugarlanskee8 You talk like a total moron.
hooplablahblahblah 1 month ago
@hooplablahblahblah
Anti-Aborts are almost always RCC, Fundie, Moslem or other religion which need more and more peoples 'feeding the plate'. Anti-Aborts loathe anyone who disagrees with them and do not even believe they are human, are pro-their-own-lives but not anybody else's.
sugarlanskee8 1 month ago
@sugarlanskee8 And this "Anti-Abort" is super athiest. I still don't see the point you're trying to make.
hooplablahblahblah 1 month ago
@hooplablahblahblah
Then, why are you an anti-abort? Are you an ultra-Humanist who says the more people the better? My happen to be Animal Rights-Atheist but the A/R part of it is what counts.
sugarlanskee8 4 weeks ago
@sugarlanskee8 It honestly sounds like you're just making shit up.
hooplablahblahblah 4 weeks ago
@hooplablahblahblah
Best to you and yourn for 2012.
sugarlanskee8 4 weeks ago
People are so stupid- Exodus 21:24, 2 Thessalonians 1:6, 6th commandment...come on...If someone walked up to me a said "Joshua Komisarjevsky and Steven Hayes should be allowed to live" I'd spit in their face and probably beat the crap outta whoever said that. People have nothing but contempt for the unborn and love the criminals.
STARSandBARS1994 6 months ago
God Almighty. How did we get so low, that a person can't distinguish between killing the terrorist and the murder of an innocent life?
I think you have to go to college to become so morally confused.
koyunbaba73 6 months ago
@koyunbaba73 trust me I know plenty of high school educated loons who are this morally confused.
austenbosten 6 months ago
@koyunbaba73
War kills innocents too you moron.
refuckulate420 5 months ago
@refuckulate420 Excuse me, you are the moron. Of course innocents get killed in war. Innocents got killed in WWII. When the allies bombed Dresden, who do you think they were bombing, Gestapo generals? They were fighting the German people, and they were trying to break their will, and they did! So what's your point, that they shouldn't have fought Germany? If they hadn't, tens of millions more would have died. When you grow up, you have to learn about something called the greater good. Idiot.
koyunbaba73 5 months ago
@koyunbaba73
WW2 was probably the last justified war we fought, in which case the death of innocents can't be avoided. But wars like Afghanistan and Iraq which have proven to be uneccessary wastes are often supported by a lot of people who claim to be pro-life. It's really quite hypocritical.
refuckulate420 5 months ago
has anybody ever told you what a genius you are?
yes, yes, every day.
well that must be because youre talking to yourself.
PRICELESS
swedeej114 7 months ago
this guy just contradicted himself just by asking
spdcool11 7 months ago
this conversation is orgasmic. You rock Mark Levin!!!
kilokipo 9 months ago
Terrorism is a tactic and a tool of military and political action. Going on "evil terroists" blah blah blah just makes you look an absolute tool. The american revolutionarys were terrorists, the French reisistance were terrorists, the Mujahideen were terrorists. And their not regarded as evil.
aaronharms123456 10 months ago
@aaronharms123456 you are really a dumb idiot, you ought to know that alright. How on hell you are comparing people who have died for you to be free and spew your ignorance to terrorists who want to kill you just cause you are from the west or don't submit to islam and sharia law. Retard, Retard. You have your right to express your dumb not well thought out remarks and i have mine, You are dumbass of the rawest quality.
kilokipo 9 months ago
what about killing civilians and american soldiers, which is what happens when you are pro war? and to actually think that we are "killing terrorists" is a failure in your brain
hempartist420 11 months ago
My recent post somehow didn't print my opening. Please add: "Shades of 1984 and double-speak! Both pro-life and pro-choice are positive-image" [terms. etc.]
frankcioppa 11 months ago
terms. Pro-life basically means anti-abortion, and was later expanded to include all that supports life (which doesn't include what destroys it). Pro-choice meant pro-abortion (and not choices they don't approve of). The caller fell into double-speak by taking "pro-life" to mean absolute non-killing, even of terrorists, dealers in genocide, and destroyers if innocent lives). You'd have to go a long way to find a pro-lifer who means this.
frankcioppa 11 months ago
They want those babies to come out, but then they don't care what happens to them afterward. WTF is that? I'm not pro abortion nor anti, because I feel that if a woman gets pregnant after being raped, or that the baby is a product of incest. There's really no black & white positions in these polar opposite beliefs, but shades of grey. Let those kids emerge from the womb & then send them off to war to be killed or maimed for life. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.
lonelyheroine 1 year ago
@lonelyheroine You just made a straw man argument. Pro-lifers don't say after babies come out we don't care for them. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Think before you post!!!
Cj5316 11 months ago
@Cj5316 I wasn't referring to ALL people. Perhaps I should have been clearer. Look, I made a conscious effort not to have kids. It would have been extremely selfish of me, because he or she would have undoubtedly ended up in foster care or worse. Not to mention taking the real risk of having one or all of them inherit my bi-polar genes. Having said that, if I had found myself pregnant, I would not make the choice of aborting it. Meaning I would put my beliefs first & doom my kid forever.
lonelyheroine 11 months ago
@lonelyheroine What are you talking about? ALL people? I'm talking about your comment on Pro Lifers in relation to the video. Let me re-state, Pro Life people are not for killing innocent people in the womb. If a person rapes and then kills, I feel someone could make a legitimate argument for the death penalty, or if terrorists are trying to kill innocent lives, should we go after them and kill them? I would say so.
Cj5316 11 months ago
sudden judgment coming where the Lord will turn everything upside down. God always moves in judgment when the cup of violence overflows. Sexual crimes against children, Homosexual ,(( Abortion)), Greed and Corruption. I LOVE America, BUT America is a toilet bowl. There are kidnappings in broad daylight right on the streets of America AND ALL OF THIS will bring
about sudden destruction that will change the world in one hour.
dewerbylhserf 1 year ago
@dewerbylhserf amen.
spetsnaz4656 10 months ago
I love Mark Levin, I get so furious reading these comments by you morons and then I replay the video.... and I'm happy again :) If there is even 1 person like mark in this world for every 100 of you drones, well be alright :)
Helionova15 1 year ago
superwhiz88 1 year ago
@superwhiz88 Democrats want: excessive taxes, no QUALITY public education, union goon control of everything, beaurocratic healthcare, excessive povery, excessive regulation on job creators, pandering to radical islamist freaks, political corectness, abortion, false global warming theories, hatred towards american way of life, regulate all and everything you can, take however much taxpayer money you want. All government, no competition, no state rights, socialism from bloated beaurocrats.
Texfield91 11 months ago
@Texfield91 by "beaurocratic healthcare you mean NHS? (which every other developed country has), and by regulating "job creators" you must mean the bums on Wall Street, and by "false global warming theories" you mean that you are scientifically illiterate and listen to anything FOX(funded by oil revenues) tells you, and by "socialism" you must mean that you just don't fucking understand what socialism is... I'm an independent so I'm not a democrat, I just thought u should know how retarded u are
hempartist420 11 months ago
@Texfield91 U are close minded person that only watch fox news..and live ur life in azz crack of republscum agenda. i dont want to waste time debate u .. why cause u are an retard.. just do an comparison wealth of Republican state and liberal state.. why is liberal state are so much richer, and conservative state are poor , because Conservative state only depend on few big corporate for their entire state income .. while libreral state have better education , health care,, roads , older care
superwhiz88 10 months ago
@Texfield91 second .. corporate in conservative state don't pay no taxes.. they only use infrastructure .. that you and i pay.. is this fair.. they guy have 1000 trucks that ride the road that you and i build.. is that fair Exxon mobile don't pay taxes , is that fair Holliburton don't pay taxes ,, is that fair royal Caribbean don't pay taxes.. while they use our infrastructure.. these companies simply register their company in small island ... this is what republscum call fair..
superwhiz88 10 months ago
pro life.. ahhahha what an fking joke yea
save the fetus.. but you don't want to support them after then come out.. cut their health benefit , cut on low income housing , cut on education ,,cut on food stamps .. yet you support keep shting them out.. so we can dump them in the street to be bums so they can come back rob us twenty years later ..
superwhiz88 1 year ago
@superwhiz88 If u didnt tax their brains out they could afford all that stuff.... if they worked for it........ dumbass....
Helionova15 1 year ago
@Helionova15 sure i am dump azz .. hahahahahhaa... against self preservation its not..
superwhiz88 1 year ago
most pro lifers really arent .....they are simply anti abortion. they support a war where thousands of innocent ppl are killed by our armed forces everyday and they rejoice at this fact, but when a womans life is on the line or gets raped and ahs to make the hardest choice the call her a murderer. the real murderers are those who rejoice when people die....esp over this phony war in iraq.
B4mytyme 1 year ago 2
@B4mytyme thank you .. for speaking true .. come back more often...
superwhiz88 1 year ago
viva mark levin....
this man is awesome...
fbi10 1 year ago
lol mark levin makes great pointz! "Ur an idiot", "war only killz terroristz, no civilian deaths!"
ElusiveHermit 1 year ago
Mark Levin is a disgrace to this country.
yourworstfear39 1 year ago
@yourworstfear39 no leftist scum like you are the disgrace
maximunoutlaw32 1 year ago
Mark Levin is such a self-righteous prick.
InfernalApocalypse 1 year ago
ah liberals, so bitchy, so wrong, but so funny.
giggity goo.
AdventureTimeTy 1 year ago
I;m glad Mark Levin put that LIberal fuckhead IN HIS PLACE !!!
Mark Levin is right...stem-cell research is not RIGHT for america!!!
The pharmaceutical industry brings more money into this country, than any other sector of our economy.
WHY in HELL... are we going to give that up... by introducing "one-time stem-cell cures". Why? ANSWER ME LIBERALS !
...And I don't care if Japan and Russia are taking the lead in stem-cell research... fuck them all !
SAY "NO" TO STEM-CELLS
MrSuperneocon 1 year ago
@MrSuperneocon
Neural cells in the brain and spinal cord that have been damaged can be replaced by stem cells. In cancer, cells destroyed by radiation or chemo can be replaced with new healthy stem cells that adapt to the affected area, whether it be part of the brain, heart, liver, lungs, or wherever. Dead cells of almost ANY kind, no matter the type of injury or disease, can be replaced with new healthy cells because of the amazing flexibility of stem cells. Drugs can't do that.
christiTN 1 year ago
@MrSuperneocon
The pharmaceutical industry brings a lot of dollars (particularly for the ones who produce the drugs) but it is also killing Americans at an alarming rate. Do a little research on how many drugs are banned, how many lawsuits are filed and WON, etc. Drugs are killing us, believe me I know.
The FDA is full of former heads of these big pharmaceutical companies. Why? Because they all work together. Not in OUR best interest but in the best interest of PROFIT...not health.
christiTN 1 year ago
Abortion is good for the soul
HowardSternn 1 year ago
Mark Levin, your the best. Please keep up the good work as a truth detector. You expose the liberal lies.
122651Lil 1 year ago
BOTH WRONG.
barbiedoll535 1 year ago
@barbiedoll535 yeah I don't agree with mark all the way but I did agree with him more that this problem must not go on with law breakers
Splangy1 1 year ago
What about the innocent killing of over 4,000 Iraqi kids? Oh, yes that's Pro-Life.
MusicCityMiracle 1 year ago
@MusicCityMiracle
I know, it will drive you nuts listening to this madness, huh?
christiTN 1 year ago
He genuinely thought that Mark Levin was calling him a genius.
Goodatconnect4 1 year ago
Mark has been to the Kool-Aid kegger. People, we aren't just killing terrorists we are killing MANY civilians, innocent people including children, babies and pregnant women. Making excuses for civilian casualties is hypocritical and no different than making excuses for abortion. If you value INNOCENT LIFE then PROTEST WAR because innocent people (including babies) get killed in every single one of them. More Americans have died in this war than "they" killed on 9/11. What a brilliant solution.
christiTN 1 year ago 48
@christiTN
I agree with a lot of what you are saying, I am pro-life and I don't see how we can justify civilian casualties, yes I do think there is a time for war, but we have to go about it properly and not bomb entire cities. I o support the death penalty because the person is a murderer and we cannot risk them escaping or orchestrating more crime behind bars. They deprived someone of life, they are not innocent.
BenjaminWirtz 1 year ago
@BenjaminWirtz
I feel the same way. I am for the death penalty when significant involvement in the crime has been proven without a doubt. I'm for getting the true evil doers off the planet. My issue is all of the fake "do gooders" who go around claiming to be pro-life yet support war or any activity that takes innocent lives, born or unborn. I wish Pro-Lifers would have a little more concern for those who have already been born. Their concern seems to fade once they are already here.
christiTN 1 year ago 9
@christiTN Girl I like ur logic :)
iversonmatthew 1 year ago
@iversonmatthew
Thanks "Matty"! LOL!! JUST KIDDING!!!!!
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN Haha nah you can call me that anytime :)
iversonmatthew 1 year ago
@christiTN
No kidding. I am no longer in the Republican party because of Neocons like him. I try to go around and explain to "Conservatives" why people like him are not one.
If you so called Tea Party members and Republicans are serious about limited government then you should support ending the Fed, bringing home our troops 865 military bases in 130 countries, ending the silly war on drugs that has cost hundreds of billions of dollars, etc. That is a true conservative position in my mind...
rmccay88 1 year ago
@rmccay88
I agree with you 100%. They are all for spending as long it is for their own personal agenda. No Tea Parties while Bush was spending (and losing) trillions. Not a peep from them when Rumsfeld was interviewed the day before 9/11 and he admitted to 2 trillion dollars being "missing". Then the WTC came down the next day along with the accounting dept at the Pentagon. Yeah, I guess it was all just a big coincidence. ;) Can you imagine is 2 trillion went "missing" under a Democrat??
christiTN 1 year ago
@rmccay88
I grew up in a Republican household and was one until Rush Limbaugh disgusted me enough to reconsider supporting any such animal. I think these people are dangerous and they are heading our country toward another civil war. Glenn Beck needs to be locked up for what he is doing. And Mark Levin is an absolute disgrace.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN
I agree 100 percent. I am a Libertarian, I have no problem with them calling Obama out for his out of control spending and Unconstitutional acts because I think he deserves it. With that said, I want people to be consistent. Where were they when Bush shredded the 4th amendment, torturing, Paulson lying under oath and getting TARP under false pretenses and passing the money out to his Goldman Sach buddies? I just want people to strip away the R and D and hold ALL people accountable.
rmccay88 1 year ago
@rmccay88
Both parties disgust me but in different ways. But the hypocrisy from the right is nauseating. Where the heck was the Tea Party when Bush was spending like a maniac? They NEVER seem concerned about spending as long as it is a Republican doing the spending. This is what I can't tolerate. If you hate the spending, then get upset with EVERYONE who is overspending, not just a certain party. I would have a lot more respect for them if they were more consistent in their views.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN do you watch the news? 99% of the civilians killed in Iraq or Afghanistan is committed by suicide bombing terrorists. it is the equivalent of saying "look at how many jews the allied armies killed during WWII"
Texfield91 1 year ago
@Texfield91
Do you actually believe the reports on the news? If they were so accurate, why would there be a need for WikiLeaks? You are very gullible and naive if you believe what is reported on the news about the war. Obviously you have never been over there or you do not know anyone who has if you actually believe that civilians are not being killed by the US. There are even videos of it right here on YouTube. I'm amazed at how many people trust everything the government tells them.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN 1,000,000 civilians died in iraq.... its not about oil, its about destroying a culture, a people, throw them into submission.
search: collateral murder
appleman1324 1 year ago
@appleman1324
I agree with you. My point about oil is that it is more about oil than getting terrorists. And its more about oil than "bringing democracy" to anyone or the multitudes of other lies and excuses that have been stated about why we are there. If you look at how much money has passed hands to get TO the oil over there, it is obvious that a lot of it has to do with oil. The destroying a culture and people part has to do with gaining control of a land that is drenched in oil, IMHO.
christiTN 1 year ago 6
@christiTN
And just how many oil derricks does the US have in Iraq?
THEVETERAN7 10 months ago
@appleman1324 I dont wish to shoot you down but Was the collateral murder video not proven to be edited in favor of wikileaks ?
Again I dont wish to shoot you down but do you mean 1,000,000 scince 2003 ? as Iraq body count puts the figure near 100,000 and most other stats do not estimate above 200,000.
spetsnaz4656 10 months ago
@spetsnaz4656 actually, wikileaks released the video "collateral murder". doesn't matter, they exposed many fields of our government, but they were part of a setup and conspiracy to continue and endorse censorship on internet sites.
the "100,000" death toll was endorsed by mainstream media, specifically targeting death by terrorist attacks, but there are the food and depletion of water supplies through uranium, a chemical warfare that resulted in over a million deaths
appleman1324 10 months ago
@appleman1324
spetsnaz4656 10 months ago
@appleman1324 Thanks for your prompt reply as it prompted some interesting reading. Please look at the above link, as I personally tend to disagree with the DU arguement firstly myself and my collagues handle it, and none of us have ever developed any health problems, secondly as far as i am aware DU is not a chemical agent and could not be used in chemical warfare.
spetsnaz4656 10 months ago
@christiTN So what dumbass you expect us to just sit back and take our citizens getting killed by the these freaks? They declared war on us thats why we went in... And all the innocent life you speak of is at the mecry of those monkeys with bombs strapped to their chests... You dont even take into account how many lives we have saved by taking these guys out, our brave troops out there right now understand that, thats why they fight. God Bless em...
Helionova15 1 year ago
@Helionova15
You are very naive and believe what the gov't and the news tell you. You must not know anyone who has been over there and is willing to discuss what actually takes place. You could at least get on YT and look at the videos that show SOME of the Americans killing civilians for fun. They actually yell "woo hoo" and laugh while they are killing civilians walking down the street. MOST are disgusted by being ordered to kill civilians though. But we ARE killing civilians and children.
christiTN 1 year ago
@Helionova15
You don't even understand why we are really there. Do you actually think we would be unable to locate Bin Laden after 10 years? Do you think they are that much smarter than us? That they could hide him for this long? If they are able to do that then they have outsmarted us yet AGAIN. The terrorists we should fear LIVE HERE. NEWSFLASH: The people who flew those planes on 9/11 were LIVING HERE not THERE. Any lives that have been saved is because of what we have done HERE not THERE.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN I dont think you can say living in a little cave eating crickets if hes even alive can be called outsmarting us, I know there could have been and probably were other agendas for going in besides the little turd bin laden but killing a nut job overthere just saves us the time of waiting for him to fly a plain over here and risk us not getting him before he detonates. When someone attacks your country you dont just sit back and wait for em to come into your territory, thats just stupid
Helionova15 1 year ago
@Helionova15
"How many lives we have saved"?
There have been hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed because of the war there so that point is moot. You must not have read the Downing Street memo's yet (which I recommend you do). Do your investigation before you trust your government to send people to war. Everyone knows the reasons why we are bombing Libya now are even more absurd considering we could be using the same justifications on about 15 different countries.
rmccay88 10 months ago
@rmccay88 Are you saying our troops are over there killing Iraqi citizens on purpose?
Helionova15 10 months ago
@Helionova15 BRAINWASHED
maximus7prime 9 months ago
@Helionova15 The war on terror breeds new terror.
lamiac2411 8 months ago
@lamiac2411 Unless you kill every last one of them...
Charonveritas 8 months ago
@Charonveritas Lol. Thats 1 way to do it
lamiac2411 8 months ago
1:23 - '...the reason behind prolife is that you're pro...life..' - brilliant!!
jskim1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is hilarious! Statist/liberal sheep can't defend the nonsense they believe. They can only criticize and attack those of us on the right; usually on the most snarky, personal, petty level.
Michael326 1 year ago
you do realize Mark... we... aren't... at... war... with... terrorists... RIGHT?
He sounds like a parakeet... have you ever listened to yourself?
DrummerBoyJason 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pregnant women are being killed in war you stupid, freaking idiots. Since you don't seem to care about the innocent men, women and CHILDREN who are killed or disfigured in war, I feel the need to let your little brains know that pregnant women are being blown to smithereens while we attempt to kill terrorists. Conservative morons never cease to amaze me. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people die in war. You think only those who sign up for the military are dying. Morons.
christiTN 1 year ago 23
Pregnant women are being killed in war you stupid, freaking idiots. Since you don't seem to care about the innocent men, women and CHILDREN who are killed or disfigured in war, I feel the need to let your little brains know that pregnant women are being blown to smithereens while we attempt to kill terrorists. Conservative morons never cease to amaze me. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people die in war. You act like only those who sign up for the military are dying. Morons.
christiTN 1 year ago 18
@christiTN While innocents do get killed in war, a lot more would get killed (especially our citizens) if we didn't go to war to stop these people, primarily the terrorists.
Ultima7132 1 year ago
@Ultima7132
Could you please explain how being in Iraq and Afghanistan is going to stop terrorism? Do you think that terrorists are going to be too "scared" to kill people? Umm, they fly airplanes into buildings, blow themselves up and set themselves on fire. These are not people who are going change their mind because of a few bombs and bullets. We are making them ANGRIER and MORE determined to harm us by killing non-terrorists (which is mostly who we are killing) in their country. L-O-G-I-C
christiTN 1 year ago 52
@christiTN Let me get my views straightened out a bit more. I believe in going to war to stop people like Hitler when it is necessary, but I do not believe that the whole war in Iraq is justifiable. Since the terrorists are not a country/army, we should not have handled it by sending in troops which, as you said, would kill a lot more innocents than the terrorists would (not counting our citizens). Personally, I think we should have fought using a guerrilla group, instead of an entire army.
Ultima7132 1 year ago
@Ultima7132
I totally agree. I am impressed by the fact that you are open minded and not defensive. Very refreshing change for YouTube! I agree, some wars have to be fought, like with Germany, because you can't just stand by and let millions of people be slaughtered. But people are still being slaughtered today but we are not invading those countries. You are right, terrorists are NOT a country, army or religion, they are a specific group. Americans have been deceived to think otherwise.
christiTN 1 year ago 11
@christiTN
But should that stop us from striving for a better world by getting rid of the guys who make it worse? Would you rather us just step aside and watch madmen terrorists wreak havoc on the rest of the world?
If you did use logic, you would see that if we didn't engage these terrorists, innocent people would still be dying. Yes, innocents have fallen during the cross fire, but it'd be no different if we stood by watching. The terrorists target the civilians, we don't. Big difference.
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@haaakkkk2010
Here is another way for you to look at what we are doing:
A man kills a police officer. He is armed and hiding at someone's house but the police don't know which one but they know the general area. So, they go through the neighborhood, house by house, shooting anything that moves just in case it is him. And while they are shooting up his neighborhood, the killer quietly leaves and moves to another country and masterminds the greatest terror attack in history out of revenge.
christiTN 1 year ago 26
@christiTN
First of all, your example makes no sense. Police officers don't go through neighborhoods shooting whatever they see just in case it is him. They would go through a thorough search of the neighborhood to find him, and then they would only shoot him if he was threatening an innocent civilian or another police officer.
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@haaakkkk2010
Yes, you are correct. This is how criminals should be dealt with...which is how we should be handling terrorists. That was my point, sugar. Terrorists are killers and should be punished. But it is NO DIFFERENT to kill civilians in Iraq while we look for a killer than it is to kill innocent people HERE while we look for a killer. The difference is those "civilians" aren't AMERICAN so the we do not care. And these pro-war hypocrites call themselves "Pro-Life". WTF ever.
christiTN 1 year ago 25
@christiTN
First of all, I'm not your sugar. I'd like the mutual respect that I have given you.
Second, that is what we have done. Since we have been over seas we have killed and caught several terrorists. Terrorists have been killing innocents before we got there, they haven't stopped since we've been there, and if we just pulled back now do you think they would stop? The terrorists are the ones who have been killing innocents intentionally. That is their goal, to create terror. We are not
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@christiTN
Secondly, yes civilians have fallen victim to terrible acts done by U.S. soldiers, and for them there is no excuse. But, the actual number of these occurances are slim compared to what actually takes place most of the time. When it does occur, heavy consequences are brought down on them. The objective of the military is to engage the enemy, and do whatever it can to also avoid the loss of civilian life. Which is pretty hard to do considering most of the time the enemy is normally
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@haaakkkk2010
Oh, and PS, do you actually think civilians aren't being targeted? Have you not tuned in to all the videos on YouTube of US soldiers "woo-hooing" while they shoot civilians? It is documented on video. HAVING FUN shooting civilians. They shoot pregnant women and blow up weddings.They rape young girls and set their home and family on fire to hide the evidence. Look up Steven Green. Do you know how much evidence has to exist for someone in the military to actually go to prison?
christiTN 1 year ago 25
@christiTN
among civilians and dressed like civilians. There are even rules of engagement that prevent soldiers from shooting unless they are shot at first. Civilians have died and its terrible, it really is. But its not because the U.S. targets them.
Your comparison of the situation in the middle east to your story carries no weight first of all. Secondly, should the police not pursue the man who killed the police officer? No! They would and they should cause its the just thing to do.
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@haaakkkk2010
I suspect you are very young so I see no need to continue this "debate". Its pointless and like challenging an armless person to a tennis match. Its an unfair game and no challenge for me even if you give it your all. So, therefore I must say...stay in school, go to college, open your mind, do not follow the sheep, do not trust the government or religion, respect authority but challenge it, think outside the box, break the mold and bend the rules. And tell 'em Christi sent ya.
christiTN 1 year ago 24
@christiTN
Yes, I am young! I'm 18. But I think it's funny that you'd dismiss my argument because of my age. I don't need any advice from someone who can't even think of a sensible argument (i.e. your police story). I have stayed in school, I am going to college, I don't follow the sheep and trust government like the rest of my generation who thinks Obama rocks just because he tells us to have hope, and I am a Christian!! Don't give me any life advice via youtube pal.
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@christiTN
I enjoyed your subtle insults though. They show your true colors.
haaakkkk2010 1 year ago
@christiTN That's a good and logical argument. We don't understand the way they think. These wars are useless and serve no purpose.
waterhead001 1 year ago
@christiTN Can you please explain to me what's "their" country? What country does the Taliban represent? What country did "they" die for on 9/11. Oh wait you can't answer that question because there IS no fucking answer. These terrorists will and have been killing people from Iraq, Afghanistan, YOU FUCKING NAME IT as long as the person doesn't share the same RELIGIOUS view with them- THEY'LL FUCKING KILL ANYBODY they consider an infidel- reguardless of their damn nationality. Now read me out-
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
You are exactly right. Terrorists will always exist and they will always kill....we can't change that. Soooooo, why are we sending our own people to die to fight a group of people that can never be stopped? Anyone reading this: TERRORISM CAN NEVER, EVER BE STOPPED. Not EVER. Not NOW and not in the future. It is an impossibility. When I refer to "their" country....uhhhh, I mean the ones our freaking soldiers are fighting in right now, duh. This is not the EARTH war...YET.
christiTN 1 year ago 2
@christiTN no no no no no no you didn't catch my message.. or maybe i didn't explain in right.. IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN and EVERY COUNTRY IN WHICH TERRORISM RESIDES should be fighting the terrorism themself, and if you fight it CORRECTLY- then the terrorism doesn't expand into another country because they're too busy fighting the country they were brought up in. and for MANY years the middle east has failed to do it that is why the Taliban is even threatening and have attacked us in the first place
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Of course they should be fighting it themselves, jeez. Does anyone on the planet not actually know this? Why the heck do you think I'm upset over sending our troops over there to fight a battle they should be fighting themselves? I have stated that we need our military HERE protecting our own country. It is obvious our military defense is seriously lacking as demonstrated on 9/11. There is no excuse for the Pentagon being hit, they had more than enough time to stop it.
christiTN 1 year ago 2
@christiTN How the heck is the 9/11 attacks a lack of "military defense" it was the AIRPORT SECURITY that FAILED to prevent terrorists from even getting on the plane in the first place. Now I just like you and pretty any sane person, does not like to hear on the news about anybody in the military getting killed.. but this Taliban we know of has existed for MANY years and the middle-eastern countries have FAILED to stop them and we have every right to be anywhere in the MIddle East fighting them
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Jesus Freaking Christ, are you not even aware that our military is on stand by to shoot down any foreign or unidentified missile that enters our airspace? That includes a God Blessed plane. A plane that makes a 180 and starts heading for the freaking PENTAGON after two planes "attacked" the WTC should have been blown to smithereens long before it even got anywhere close. If it takes this long to shoot down a plane, how do you think they will handle a missile out of nowhere?
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN "our military is on stand by..." when in any of my comments did i suggest i didn't know this?
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
When did your comments suggest you didn't know our miitary was on stand by?
Right here: "How the heck is the 9/11 attacks a lack of "military defense"
Anybody with ANY knowledge in this area at ALL would know what a TREMENDOUS error this was on the part of our government and military to allow a hijacked plane to arrive at the Pentagon with THAT much notice. Trillions of dollars for the military and this is the best we can do? Oh yeah, GREAT security we have over here.
christiTN 1 year ago 2
@christiTN lol I'll say it again.. It was the AIRPORT SECURITY'S JOB TO MAKE SURE A TERRORIST DOESN'T GET ON A US AIRPLANE IN THE FIRST PLACE. But yes I agree the military should have known immediately where the plane was going and as soon as the communications were disrupted and the planes went off course they should have been immediately blown to pieces
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
LOL, it is the government's place to set airport standards.You can't blame airport security without blaming the government. Not sure if you know this or not but this wasn't the first time a terrorist boarded a plane. The government was fully aware that this was a threat and has been for many years. Why didn't they secure the problem? They had been put on notice of the threat of airplane attacks and had practice drills. Yet the terrorists still outsmarted our gov't. Feel safe?
christiTN 1 year ago 2
@christiTN well yeah i fly like 3 times a year to see my dad. ever since 9/11 theyve beefed up the security a crap load. and no I actually thought that the airport security wasnt military lol idk y. but thanks for informing me
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
But the government and the military are sort of the same. Different but the same. Air traffic controllers aren't just making sure vacationers get to their destination on time. Naturally our military is going to be notified anytime a commercial airliner appears to be going way off course and heading toward the Pentagon. Military involvement starts at that moment as it well should. The military isn't patrolling airports but they sure better be ready if something is amiss.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN Please forgive me if I sound pissed at you, I don't blame you for something you don't understand, it's just that your way of thinking seems to be everybody's- and it's quite frankly overwhelming. And there is obviously NOTHING wrong with being concerned for anybody's innocent life. But see this terrorist group you refer to is the Taliban- "duh" I know you're thinking- and where they are brought up-the Middle-East- ones allegiance is to their family, religion, THEN leader-THAT ORDER.
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Actually, yes, I agree. Both sides are willing to die for what they believe in. I've been saying that for many years. But you don't know that because you've only read a couple of my posts on YouTube. The difference is that many people join the military for a job or an education and they don't really want to fight in a war EVER and they are playing the odds that they won't have to ever go. And when I think about them losing their lives for a war based on lies, it sickens me.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN well firtst off forgive me for assuming you weren't clear on whats going on but believe a lot of people aren't clear. Well then i think that's a problem don't you? "many people join the military for a job or an education and they don't really want to fight in a war EVER and they are playing the odds that they won't have to ever go" sad thing is you're right and I personally dont thin they d=should take that chance if they don't want to sacrifice themself.
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
You know what, it is not my place to judge why anyone joins the military. I haven't been in a position of not being able to get an education or a job. I haven't walked in their shoes. I can't say "it was stupid to join the military if you didn't want to go to war" because that is apparent. People who get on a plane don't expect it to crash but it happens. Should we say they shouldn't have taken the chance if they weren't willing to die? We all know planes can crash.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN umm no.. see the military- or atleast from what I understand- is a service of our government, in which young men and women join and knowingly put their country before THEMSELF, and put their country BEFORE the benefits they may acquire such as an education. And by all means I believe that I have the right to say it is not a great idea to join something that you don't particulary believe in, personally for self-benefits.
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
You can say whatever you want, just like I can say you are an idiot for getting in a plane and then crying as it crashes. You knew it was a possibility. These kids are just that - kids. Do you actually think an 18 year old is capable of fully understanding what he/she is doing when they join the military? They are brainwashed by our government and military leaders to BELIEVE they should put their country first. This happens AFTER they join the military, not before.
christiTN 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Are you really this naive? Do you not realize that people do all sorts of things that they do not particularly believe in for INCOME and benefits? It happens all day, every day, in every walk of life. Look at all the crap jobs people do all over this planet that they do not really want to be doing because they need or want the paycheck. You have the right to say anything you want but you are putting human behavior into far too simplistic terms. Where do you live, Utopia?
christiTN 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Well, first of all, its genius...and second, could you translate your question into some form of English so that I may attempt to answer?
christiTN 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Wait, I think I figured it out. You are asking how is it that I know something they do not? Well, it has to do with being on the planet for 44 years vs only 18. It has to do with having an advanced education which is something they haven't had a chance to receive yet. There is a vast difference between ignorance and stupidity. Who said they are stupid? You can be ignorant of a subject yet still be an intelligent person. You can gain knowledge but sometimes its too late.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN by the way im 17 and I'm considering joining the Airforce and completely understand that my life will be at risk and im not gonna do it for any benefits or MONEY and it's not anybodys fault but their own to join something like the military and doing it souly for MONEY or the education they couldnt get in the college they could have got a scholarship from doing well in school
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
This conversation has grown stale...for me at least. I do appreciate you giving it your best shot though. NIghty night.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN no see this is why i think you're the idiot because your comparing JOINING THE MILITARY to A CIVILIAN GETTING ON A FUCKING PALNE AND HOPING IT DOESN'T CRASH. See EVERYBODY- even the "stupid and pre-brainwashed 18 year olds" you say to be who join the military know or SHOULD know that joining ANY branch in the military is always a sacrifice by being ready to serve their country when called upon and UNDERSTAND that they would risk their life for people of our country b4 brainwash begins
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Are you even 18 years old? Listen, this is just silly and I'm not going to waste any more time on this nonsense. I tried to entertain you with your "enlightening" information about terrorism. What, did you just Google that before getting on YouTube or something? Feel as though you had come to this big conclusion about the Taliban and you wanted to educate someone? Alrighty then. Sugar, you picked the wrong person. Better luck next time. I'm going to bed now.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN no sir, I am 17 therefore I am not 18. And no, all of the knowledge I have and was TRYING to help you understand about the war on terrorism came from my dad. Not trying to boast- but my dad's been in the Marine Corps for 31 years and he's been over seas fighting twice and he told me everything about it but then again- me and you both know that he is in the military so he is brainwashed as am I and we are dillusionists who have no clue how the world works. You win, God bless you , nite
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Look, I know you mean well. And I do want to say I'm impressed with the fact that you KNOW about how terrorism works, most people do not. And I'm sorry for saying anything that was insulting to you or your dad. You just started out with this arrogance, saying "I know you just don't understand the Taliban" without even taking the time to find out what I did or did not know. YOU were assuming I did not know how the world works...so that is one finger you really can't point.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN well you what you're right. and i admit shouldnt have just assumed anything about you just because of a couple comments. or actually one.. idk. It's just i always hear people protest the war and they go on and it bugs how little they actually know about it. you are different though honestly... first one ive came across who gets it
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
I feel the same about you. I respect you. So many people are pro-war without even knowing why. You are doing your homework and you aren't screaming and cussing and acting like a psycho. I think you are a smart kid. And I'm sorry we didn't hit it off on the right foot.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN
Sorry, I posted the next to last comment before I got your kind response. Otherwise I would have worded it differently. I'm sure you are fully aware that terrorists have boarded airplanes before. Sorry for being a smart ass.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN well hey I respect you too and whats sad is that our parties in our government cant even respect eachother. and yeah lol probably not the right foot but, hey, what's it matter now
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
Hey, we have even more in common....our political parties not respecting each other is one of my greatest pet peeves in life. Always pointing a finger but never at themselves.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN oh alright thanks for explaining that. and yeah no kidding how the heck can we get anything done when we have these high-egoed politicians so worried about not being wrong than getting anything done for the country? it's always been annoying to to me
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@christiTN Note how religion comes before leader, and what this suggests is the encouragement for one to have such extremist views on their religion. Therefore the Taliban- considers all those who's religion doesn't line up to their own to be an "infidel" must die at any cost- even sacrificing their own life, because their religion is greater than their life itself. SOUND FAMILIAR? Like how those in OUR military joined to sacrifice THEIR life because our country is greater than our life itself?
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@christiTN Okay so the Taliban erose in the Middle-East and they've been fighting the "infidels" for many, many, many years. Despite this "terrorism" exists in EVERY country, and it is the duty for that particular country to fight it's own terrorism itself. Now the problem with the Taliban is that in the Middle-East the allegiance is more towards what good for each individuals family and religion more than what's good for their own country-It's completely different mindset and hard to understand
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@criticalsense92
I actually completely understand the situation. And I will never change my opinion about this war. We just shouldn't be over there, plain & simple. Its not going to change anything and we can't eradicate all terrorists all over the globe. They are everywhere and they are probably our neighbors. They don't go around wearing Turbans. They blend into society. That's how they get on planes and fly them into buildings. I'm sort of tired of discussing this also.
christiTN 1 year ago
@christiTN Which explains why so many people are opposed to this war and nobody really know what's even happening or who we are exactly fighting. So many people mainly in the US believe we are fight Iraqies in Iraq and Afghanies in Afghanistan and what they don't understand is that these terrorists and insurgents are from everywhere and could care less of their own nationality. See what our troops are doing.. or should I say trying to do is help stabilize a democracy- NOTHING LIKE OURS- but...
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@christiTN a democracy that would be able to set up its own military, police force, etc. so THEY can fight terrorist groups like the Taliban. And if the Taliban and a stabilized democracy in the Middle-East are fighting eachother... who are they not trying to attack?.. get it?? This can also work like the "dominoe-theory"-one country falls to commusim,it's neighbor does too/One country becomes Democracy/It's neighbor does too. I'm NOT saying it will work and I'm NOT saying it won't.
criticalsense92 1 year ago
@christiTN Well said! Kudos!
iversonmatthew 1 year ago
@christiTN so i guess we just ignore al qaeda and then they will leave us alone? we tried that, and look what it got us: the 93 bombing of the WTC, 2 of our embassies in africa blown to hell in 98, and the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. we are not trying to "scare" them. we are trying to KILL them.
Texfield91 1 year ago 2
@Texfield91
Do you actually think that terrorism can be stopped? Do you not realize that they are spread out all over the planet? Do you really think that people who can outsmart the US government, military and TSA on 9/11 are just going to stay put in an area where they are known to be? Do grown adults actually believe this? I just will never understand this level of thinking. We can't even locate Bin Laden after a decade yet people have faith that we are "getting the terrorists". Sheesh.
christiTN 1 year ago
I'm sure the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians who have been killed are resting easier now that it's been revealed by Mark Levin that they were all just "terrorists." Isn't this guy a lawyer? And he can't do better than just the basest form of sarcasm at the beginning, telling the caller "oh, you're so smart! It must be bad to kill terrorists hurr hurr"
eunicron 1 year ago
Abortion saves lives
Howard Stern
HowardSternn 1 year ago
Mark is right on here. We are pro-INNOCENT life. This caller is capable of understanding the difference, he just won't because it's politically inconvenient for him. There is a law higher than man's and he needs to understand that.
dmreeoogdaq 1 year ago
The libs think they're smart by trying to compare saving innocent babies from being torn apart in the womb to killing terrorists and mass murderers on death row. Amazing.
xxashyy 1 year ago
The great one strikes again!
MiKeNeWbUrGeR 1 year ago
Neocons like Levin make me sick. He has some things right, but why continue to back 2 fraudulent wars? Over a million people dead in Iraq since we started that war for WMD's that of course weren't there.
chriscr123 1 year ago
@chriscr123
wow, totally over exaggerated. More like around 100,000, and this s results from violence in general.
thundersnake1 1 year ago
What a dickhead Levin is. Just talk over people, overpower them with stupidity and voila, you're right everytime. Any idiot still defending this Iraq war bullshit it just that, an idiot. And Obama is Bush with an afro, and he keeps piling on debt along with not living up to the promises of getting us out of Iaq and Afghanistan. This country is screwd big time
inbredagogo 1 year ago
@nockout
The doctor didn't go around soliciting women for abortions. These women make that choice freely. I know you conservative idiots don't understand the concept of choice but that's how it works. We make choices and then we live with those choices. That woman who makes that choice has no culpability to you because you want to hate a doctor who can more easily be made a vill