Added: 5 years ago
From: travisdeluxe
Views: 280,303
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (439)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I learned to Skat from Stevie and Grover and Richard Pryor taught me my alphabet.

    It all went to shit when Elmo came along.

  • Do people dislike shit just to dislike? whats with the 7 people who dislike this?

  • Damn! Hella funky!

  • haha this is awesome

  • DL the audio from this song at tubepull doht cohm.

  • was that bob mintzer?!?!

  • Kid in the red sweater... no OSHA violation there!

  • When I am having a bad day I think of this song and it brings a huge smile to my face. Oh, such are the memories of childhood.

  • Thats a bad bad man right there autotune and all baby the baddest alive!!!

  • @yanna50h that's not autotune: it's called a talk box! Way cooler!

  • @hippojuice23 true

  • @hippojuice23 Thank you for the info. Its cool!!!

  • Do you think it could be anthony keidis in the red?? It may as well be...

  • Wonderlove really sang great on this 1, right, gang? God bless!

  • Roger Troutman's vocoder!

  • @kuifmans2001 NAW This was in 72.....

  • I remember this when it was on originally!! I was 11!!! Thanks for posting!! Stevie always has been and always will be the BEST!!!!

  • wot 5 heinous fools clicked thumbs down???

  • it's called a vocoder l2 steviewonder

  • @greenbean105 actually it's a talkbox!

  • this is the best Stevie WOnder song! LOL

  • @LMBMSP i've got the MP3 for this, I listen to it all the time lol

  • auto-tunes manually 1973 t-pain!!!!!!!!

  • stevie and his talk box = AMAZING !!

  • OH MY! I have forgotten all about this video; haven't seen it since it first came on Sesame Street back then and I still love love love love this! very cool! Jam on Stevie & band!

  • Thanks for posting! More love!

  • this maybe the coolest video on the internet!

  • This was on near the end of the same episode where he played "Superstition". I consider myself fortunate to have been one of the little ones watching when this first aired...and was also grooving to it just as much as the kid in red!!

  • @wsbtam I remember this too! It set the pace for all other musicians that fame after him, and I do believe he was the first, unless I am mistaken.

  • T pain who???

  • It's the best video on youtube!

  • Styles change. Style doesn't. And I am glad.

  • mutron tre babay , yah!!!! ( just got mine)

  • This what made Roger do the Talkbox!

  • @whouwit24 Yes sir!!!

  • This bassline is the shit.

  • hey everyone check out my channel im a 12yr old singer and im singing stevie wonder

  • METAL!!

  • i love this! so classic!

  • daaaang

    i didn't know it was stevie wonder singing this song

    i thought it was the old theme song for the show

    in the 70s

  • kid in the red at 1:09 = fliest motherfucker ever

  • @kingmeehanthewicked If you watch Stevie singing Superstition on SS, i think it's the same kid that is ROCKING OUT about 39 sec in. I'd like to see a version of the song with just that kid! Awesome!

  • @kingmeehanthewicked haha!!! watch the other stevie wonder vid on youtube, superstition should be on the right >> the kid in red at 4:10, dunno whether it's the same kid,haha, this kid's got soul!!!

  • @pengy94: it is, they are both from the same episode of SS...I was watching that day in '72.

  • @wsbtam woah! nice! u must be really old! haha, sorry. i wish i was around your age, cuz i love sesame street so much, i wish i could watch all the episodes!!! i turned 16 in may, btw

  • @pengy94 i just realized, that kid looks like the young mowgli from the jungle book movie!

  • @kingmeehanthewicked You gotta see how he dances in the superstition video from the same day.

  • @kingmeehanthewicked how bout that little girl sitting!

  • @kingmeehanthewicked Got that too!!

  • @kingmeehanthewicked

    You gotta see him in the Superstition clip!

  • @mountpanic (at ~ 4:19 in superstition xD)

  • @kingmeehanthewicked

    That's Lenny Kravitz :)

    

  • @staeone1 is that really Lenny Kravitz??

    in all seriousness?!

  • @staeone1 Ray Parker Jr.(Ghostbusters) is in this band, though!

  • This is so fucking dope

  • BEAST!!!

  • All we ever got in the UK was Playschool!!! Stevie is the best

  • Very cool I agree shouldve been the theme song :) 123 sesame street

  • This should have been the theme song for the show.

  • I know...right...I'll NEVER understand why they didn't use this...esp for the 72-73 season...and 73-74 season.

  • this was in 1973

  • Whoe man

  • Got up and danced, just like when I was 4 years old!

  • is that a talkbox i see

    yup, stevie was like one of the pianoeers of the talkbox

  • I like his shades!!! Stevie's the best!!!

  • Life in the early 70's.Dig the clothes!

  • Is anyone amazed at the fact that this man is doin sesame street and by now wrote some of history's most amazing albums by this time...and he was def only 22 years old...

  • I was wondering if that was Nathan Watts...looks like him. He's been playing with Stevie FOREVER.

  • Comment removed

  • Funky

    Ass

    Shit

    No question. :)

    Go Stevie!

  • i was 2 years old.. i cant remember this but i started watching this shit young ... good times!! definately! SS rocks.. what other kids show gave them some of the best music the country had to offer...

  • Wow- can't believe how much richer the sound is from a talkbox than from a vocoder. I gotta get me one of those.......

  • Stevie is truly a genius. He's doing his thing on the vocoder, which was not normal to use in R&B music at that time. Nothing again Roger Troutman, but Stevie is the one that brought the talk box to R&B!!

  • He is also the first RnB artist to ever do Reggae with Master Blaster Jammin....amazing song!

  • that was epic

    RESPECT

  • T Pain tryin to get paid/copywrite for somethin that was done b4 he was born.

  • damn.....

  • wow, his face is so thin! I would give anything to back in time and jam with stevie - man I wish I grew up in the 70's

  • must be the coolest hippest kids show ever

  • it USED to be... sigh !

  • The kid on the fire escape was on an episode in 1973(at least I think it was around 1973). Stevie Wonder also starred on that episode. Geez he must really like Sesame Street AND Stevie Wonder. He's a cute kid though. Type in

    Stevie Wonder- Superstition Live On Sesame Street. Look for the kid in the red shirt, partying like theres no tomorrow.

  • @ladyshoud Its all the same episode, if you look closely same people, same clothes, same children, just broken up on ty

  • Cool bass riff!

  • I believe that's a young Nathan Watts. Stevie's long time bassist. Check out Do I Do to here some really good licks.

  • This is so much fun! :)

    Does anybody know the lyrics?

  • It's actually not a vocoder, its a talk box. See the hose in his mouth?

  • This song has sung out in my head ever since the first time it aired in the 70's.I remember watching seseme street with my children at the time when Stevie Wonder sang this and superstition. I thuoght i would never hear or see this clip again. Thanks

  • It seems that Stevie Wonder certainly did a great job of singing this song with the cast on Sesame Street, don't you think?

  • whatever!!..

  • this is unbelievably funky material to present to kids across america. i dont think stevie growling undistinguishable phrases about sesame street into a vocoder would fly today, i think it would have to have a message about acheademics rather than just an education in good music.

  • This was at the tail-end of the show he perfomed Superstiotion; easily the coolest SS episode ever, IMHO.

    I loved the kid that was rockin' out too.

  • awsum performer

  • Wow... I had only a dim memory of this song from when I was a kid, mainly Stevie singing "1-2-3" into the vocoder... but a Google search found it! Cool stuff.

  • Ballin'.

  • lil one at 1:07 is doin it :)

  • lololololololol that really made my day

  • I watch Sesame Street with my son. Umm I dont ever see or hear anything like this.

  • WElcome to the 21st century. :\

  • To be honest, can you name one act out now that you can put on sesame street lol? Lets be real, quite a few "successful" acts are not the sharpest knives in the drawer lol. I won't name any name's but a few are r&b acts and quite a few are rap acts. Sign of the times.

  • God really blessed Stevie Wonder, to say the least!!

  • i love that little kid in the orange shirt his dance moves are awsome

  • Even Sesame Street Is Made Bitching Buy Stevie

  • Anthony Jackson!

  • Still ABSOAFRIGGIN BEAUTIFUL!!!

    I come in here and listen to this because it always makes me feel better!

  • Holy shit, me too!!

  • Good GOD, this is awesome, wrapped in win, and slathered in FUCK YEAH!!!!!

  • Stevie is a god..

  • I love this song!

  • Super cool!

  • Classic !!!!!!

  • when were talkboxes invented

  • Learn to Google.

  • Amen!!!!!! Give Stevie Some respect.

  • how did this beautiful video of stevie wonder on sesame street turn into some theology philosophy discussion?! can you take it somewhere else?

  • Superstition was also performed.

  • Wow... They just don't make em' like they used to... Anyone seen Blue's Clues lately? Awful...

  • jesus christ it's always a quarrel over something that has NOTHING to do with the damn video!

  • Stop arguing you dicks

  • Is mr drums richard kenyon???

    He's an argumentative bastard too.

  • Um, so anyway, I love this video. It takes me back to childhood. Thanks for posting!

  • Stevie keepin it funky

  • fun is 1? what does that mean?

  • This video is awesome beyond words.

    And the little dude feeling it at 01:07 is worth a cult following of his own.

  • the little dude feeling it at 01:07 grew up to be the one and only Prince!!!

    not really. but he does kinda look and move like a 3-yr old Prince. no?

    stevie is indeeed the man

  • Yet even certain differences carry certain similarities. The pipe organ may sound different from hammond b-3 but they both come from the same organ family tree.

  • true, but u also have to see it like this: we are all human that is the same, but our different dispositions and interests are what distinguishes one human being from another. just the same for the two examples u just mentioned yes they are from the same organ family but they're sound and usage are what distinguishes one organ from another. it is the differences not the similiarities that make things unique.

  • Well then how would you categorize identical twins who look exactly the same but are into things and have different personalities? That's exactly how I look at the pipe organ/hammond b-3 & talk box/vocoder contrast/comparisons.

  • nothing changes because they look the same. u will be able to distinguish one twin from another based on their personalities. no two things are EXACTLY alike, in some form or fashion they are different.

  • Maybe so, but it can very similar to the effect that you begin to put them all in the same category due to the sound that they're both reaching for.

  • i never said that they couldn't be put in a different category, but even though they are reaching for the the same results the sound in fact different enough where u can distinguish the two. u will be able to tell the difference between the talk box and the vocoder or a pipe organ and a hammond b-3. there is always something different about two things albeit how small one thing has a distinctive characteristic that will enable a person to distinguish one from another.

  • One's a technological advancement from the original model, that's the main difference I see apart from the different names but they all come off as robotic voices and organ sounds to me.

  • but different robot voices and organ sounds. cuz if they didn't sound different you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the two. is it not true that u can distinguish the difference between a vocoder and a talkbox and a pipe organ and hammond b-3

  • I know it's possible for one instrument to successfully mimic the other to the point where it can fool the listener into thinking it's a certain musical instrument when it's actually another. I know, it's happened to me and if it could can happen to me, who's to say it can't or hasn't fooled anyone else like that.

  • i already said that, so there is not reason to reiterate it. but, like i said before just as it can or has fooled one person, it may not or has not fooled another. it all depends on the person.

  • THAT I agree w/ you on, it does depend on the person who listens to the instrumental feedback.

  • well i'm glad that we can finally agree on something.

  • Well, stranger things have been known to happen.

  • awesome talkbox! sounds nothing like a vocoder!

  • Different strokes for different folks. It's all the same to me.

  • no, it's different. btw, do you like diff'rent strokes?

  • That's why I said "It's all the same TO ME". You don't have to agree. BTW I love Diff'rent Strokes because simply because it's for diff'rent folks.

  • Damn what happen to this music?

  • This is the song! I'm going back to school after break is over singing this down the hallway!!! LMAO! Stevie should release a box set with all the songs he ever recorded whether they were released or not.

  • That was some pretty funky music.

  • Zarejestrowałem się z Bonuscodem MONEY1 na Redkings com. Otrzymuję tu w prezencie 1000$. I to całkowicie bez ryzyka! Czy ktoś zna jeszcze inne online pokerroomy, gdzie to jest możliwe?

  • The guitar player was none other than Ray Parker, Jr.

  • Now that's how you use a vocoder, not T-Pain shit that's popular these days!

  • It's a talk box hence, the tubing in his mouth

  • Besides the tubing that's in his mouth & the different names associated w/ each of these devices, is there really a difference once you listen to the results!

  • Yes. Mr. Roboto does not sound like More Bounce To The Ounce.

  • Obviously because the rhythms in each of the songs are different. However, listen to the very beginning of Zapp and Roger's "More Bounce To The Ounce". It's clearly a replica of the robot sound heard on Stevie's Sesame Street song. One instrument is a more updated version of the other, that's the only difference I see. Otherwise, it's all the same thing with that same robotic sound.

  • That's right, both Zapp and Stevie use a talkbox. A vocoder is an entirely different machine working on an entirely different principle. A vocoder takes an audio signal (eg. from a mic) and modulates it to another. Done entirely electronically. Think "In The Air Tonight" or "Mr. Roboto". A talkbox performs its feat in the physical world.

  • Yes, the vocoder is an entirely different instrument but w/ the same purpose as the talk box, which is to replicate the sound of a robot, so other than from a mechanical standpoint, it can't be working on an entirely different principle. The only difference is, one is more updated technologically than the other. Same name, different pronounciation like tomato-tomatoe.

  • Okay, fair enough, on a general level. Their applications are different though, and would not be interchangeable in most situations. A vocoder is not simply "controlled muffling" like a talkbox. Most folks would agree that they do not sound alike.

  • If both of these instruments are so different(and they are on a technological level), why is the talk-box often confused w/ the vocoder, considering all of these other other modules that produce robotic voices exist? Like the sonovox,the autotuner, the ring mudulator, etc..Also, when you listen to the robotic chorus heard in Afrika Bambatta's "Planet Rock" chorus(Rock,rock planet rock.....)as synthesized as it is, it's still a robot voice that you're hearing like Stevie's SS song.

  • To be very very general, yes you can do robot voices with both. Try doing a Roger Troutman with a vocoder. It won't sound right. Much like the snare on an 808 and a snare drum would both be considered "snare sounds" they are quite different.

    If you had actually used a vocoder or talkbox for any length of time you would already know how different they are and this conversation would have been over long ago.

  • There's no need for me to personally try to imitate "The Roger Troutman Sound" on a vocoder when I've already heard it done on Daft Punks' "Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger". It CAN be done & WILL sound right if done properly, which Daft Punk clearly demonstrated through their use of it back in 2001.And yes this conversation would have been over a long time ago if I was convinced that a vocoder produced an ENTIRELY different robotic effect from the talk-box, THAT I agree w/ you on.

  • And to answer your question about why they're confused.... lack of education. People also confuse salamanders and lizards which couldn't be more different from one another.

  • Whether or not people are educated on the history behind certain instruments, there are still some songs out there that are a little misleading. For instance, the Mbira(thumb piano) & the Vibes sound hauntingly similar to each other,to the point where I actually thought an Earth, Wind,& Fire tune had a vibe sound to it.This was until finding out it was a Mbira. Not to mention, the certain types of keyboards that successfully replicate the sound of certain instruments.

  • nice little argument you guys had about basically nothing. Anyway, some people have better ears than others and can clearly hear the difference between a talk box and something like a digital vocoder, or a keyboard vs acoustic instrument. many keyboards can accurately duplicate the overtones series of certain instruments, but that is not the ONLY thing that effects timbre.

  • If the discussion myself and ryanvane had was about nothing, you would've bypassed our comments and wouldn't have felt inspired to add your little 2 cents to the topic. If anything, you just would have just commented on Stevie's performance on SS. And I still feel there are keyboards out there that can successfully replicate the sound of the talk-box note for note so well that it can fool the listener regardless of how good or bad their ears are.

  • think what you want

  • That shouldn't be a problem, I will.

  • see i don't agree with u on that because u can never make a keyboard sound EXACTLY like a talk-box...it may be dangerously close, but not exactly...and who made u the spokesperson for all people that u can come to the conclusion that a keyboard can replicate a talk box and fool everyone regardless of how good or bad their ears are...now u are doubting human possibility...maybe it would fool u, but what may fool u may not necessarily fool the next person.

  • Who says you can NEVER? The word "never" should be permanently erased from your vocabulary especially w/ the technology that's available today & will be available tomorrow. And for the record I'm not trying to be a spokesperson for anything, I'm just giving my opinion on the subject matter. If I feel that a keyboard can replicate a talk box, how am I doubting human possibility when I for one feel that it can be done?

  • the word never is necessary because realistically there are some thing that can simply not be done whether we want to believe it or not...and i did not say that u were doubting human possibility because u believe that it can be done, but u doubted human possibility because u believe that a person will not be able to tell the difference between two things that sound similar...that is where u doubted...u presented ur "opinion" as if it were fact.

  • How can I feel that a person will not be able to tell the difference between things that sound similar when I partially agreed with you that what may fool me may not fool the next person. That's not entirely doubting human possibility. And if you feel that the word "NEVER" is necessary, then not only are YOU doubting human possibility but you ALSO are presenting your opinion as if it were a fact (If that's what you think I'm doing).

  • Also not to mention, you say what may fool me, may not fool the next person. True, but so is the fact that it might.

  • Isn't that what the meaning of "may" is? I'm not saying that it will not fool the next person. It very well may, but u are not the one that determines whether or not it will or will not. and same as with the word "never", same can apply there. some things may never happen, so i can not completely erase that word from my vocabulary because u expect one thing to happen and it doesn't, so then what?

  • You didn't say "Some things may never happen" in your earlier paragraph when you described your concept of the word "never", you said the word "never" IS necessary and that "Some things simply CANNOT BE DONE", which one is it?. Saying "Some things MAY never happen" & "Simply CANNOT be done" are 2 different opinions.If you feel that I'm not the one to determine things then you DEFINITELY are not one either w/ your contradicting concept of the word "Never".

  • first of all i'm not coming across as if i am one to determine anything as u are, so let's get that straight right now...secondly u are getting it all wrong, they both mean the same thing...

  • The way how you're coming across and the way that you FEEL you're coming across are 2 different things at this point. When it comes down to it, it's all an opinion whether you see it or not. Even if you currently feel that the talk box & the keyboard do not sound alike, who's to say that another keyboard won't come along tomorrow to change your opinion. That's why you can never say "NEVER". Secondly, saying "MAY NEVER HAPPEN" & "CANNOT BE DONE" are 2 entirely different statements NOT THE SAME.

  • point proven that the two statements are different, i can admit that...but to say that never saying never is dumb within itself...for example if u throw an object in the air, it will never stay in the air cuz gravity doesn't permit it to, the same as if u jump in the air u will never stay in the air u will come back down. if u were to jump off of a tall building u will die. if u were to get shot in the head with a shotgun u will die. so explain to me how "NEVER" should never be said?

  • This still a slim chance of survival if you get shot in the head (although you may never be the same) and there could even be a chance of survival if you were to jump off a building (A very, very slim chance but it could happen), stranger things have happened before. If you were an astronaut in outerspace and threw an object in the air, chances are it won't come back down. That's how I can explain to you that the word "NEVER" shouldn't be said.

  • that's a bunch of bs and u know it. i didn't say get shot in the head with a small ass gun, but i said specifically a shotgun. of course there is a chance of survival with a smaller less potent gun. now i didn't say some 5 story building, i said more specifically a tall building like the wtc. all of the people who jumped off that building died and all who will try the same will die. and finally, we are not talking about outerspace we are talking about on earth. please do not distort my words.

  • Now if my memory serves me correct, the World Trade Center Building was a 47-story building as well. If you're unfamiliar this story, then google Alcides Moreno and you'll see what I'm talking about. Now last but certainly not least, if you're holding a feather or a balloon in your hand (especially in windy weather) and were to throw it up in the air, you know damn well there's a good chance it may never come down. And I'm not distorting your words I'm just offering you a different perspective.

  • i read up on that and the article said that his colleagues saw that he rode the platform that they were working on which created some wind resistance which slowed the fall down, while on the other hand his brother who was knocked off of the platform died because he suffer the fall full force. secondly, you know damn well that no matter how light the object it will come back down, but it will just take a longer time to do so.