Um, if the information in living things is ASTRONOMICALLY LESS than the information in the supposed Designer, then how does it make sense to argue that the information in living organisms is too great to come into existence, so there must have been a Designer???
You posted hostility then when I resond you get your panties all twisted and call more names...figures...I would expect nothing less from a moron. Go bark up someone else's tree you dirt bag idiot. If you make another post I will delete all of your posts and block your screen name you douche bag moron.
You are the one responding to it...what does that make you? Yeah if it was irrelevant you wouldn't have found it worth responding to, but you responded....fool.
Yeah, Its about as brilliant as those who claim there is a common ancestor between humans and chimps. It uses the same basic logic and reasoning as those who make that claim.
He starts off trying to do a parody about scientists who believe the theory of evolution and then he goes into abiogenesis. Then he butchers that theory by saying the first life form was a bacteria. Only creationists believe bacteria just popped into existence. I guess the parody is really about creationists.
Yeah I shoulda said it was algae...Yeah that woulda worked better cuz algae is in water too...yeah thats it it was algae. ..THEN bacteria...yeah thats it algae then bacteria...that makes more sense. ...first matter then algae then bacteria...yeah thats how it works uh huh. yeah
This Mexican understands your english, get down homies. I wish Dawkins could see this, I would pay 100 dollars or 20.000 pesos and a sack of weed to see the look on his face.
You better tell Silvia Brown that you want your money back, because your psychic abilities suck. Ive never said the list was proof of anything. so you might want to save yourself the trouble of wasting all your energy lol. I think its time to take out the FACEPALM.
And yet, you never explained what the expression on his face would be, or why he would have it.
My personal opinion about what would happen is a facepalm, and was merely presenting another possibility, the two most obvious that I could think of. What other expressions would he likely have?
I did not mean to imply you thought that, I meant that horror would make sense IF you believed that. I apologize for the inadequacies of English language, and lack of sleep.
I didnt realize I was required to explain his facial expressions. This is whats called a parody, as unflatering as it is to the simple /just so/ dogma that make up evolutionary theory. If your interested in my oponion on the dissent list, I have posted them on donexedus dissent post for the last couple of days. I think don decided to entitle it "scienist who reject evolution" wich really is a misnomer since evolution can mean either macro or micro to different people.
I'm sorry, but I don't see any evidence for your position hear. All I see is emotional ranting and bellyachin. All i ask was just a simple grain of sand.
You still haven't show that you are familiar with mtDNA. Nor have you presented ANY argument for your position. Therefore if you continue to make these nonsensical posts that contain simpleminded blather, I will have to delete your posts and block your comments.
Now post just one article that shows that common ancestry between apes and man is science.
I know about mitochondrial DNA. And I know what "reserch" you refer to. It is produced by creationists. It has nothing to do with science. It has not been peer-reviewed. It's jibberish. Made up by people that doesn't follow the scientific method in their "reserch".
You CAN trust the scientific method, because the whole point of it, the way it works, is by trying to disprove the proposed theory/hypothesis, whatever it may be. In this case the theory of evolution..
The theory of evolution have been up for this kind of testing for 150 years, more than 200000 peer-reviewed papers exist on the subject, covering just about every conceivable part of the theory, and they all support it.
The theory still holds water. There is not a single paper that contradicts it.
Several famous creationists themselves have clearly stated that if there was any evidence that contradicted what they believed or what was in the bible, they refuse it.
Ah, why am I not surprised. You really keep sinking lower and lower don't you.
I made a typo, and because of that I can't possibly know anything about mitochondrial DNA?
Following your "logic"; If a simple typo holds that much "power", all the false information, blantant lies, hypocrisy and ignorance from the creationists surely must mean that you don't know shit about anything.
Oh wait, you actually don't, and you just keep proving this over and over.
And this comes from the guy that thought putting in fake teeth and making himself sound and look like a hillbilly would support HIS claims against evolution. Oh boy you're just priceless :]
You still haven't presented any evidence for your position. this leads me to believe that you don't know anything about evolution and what is shows and what is doesn't show. You fail
What did your claim prove? Even tho it's false, it certainly doesn't disprove the fact that humans and chimps share common ancestor.
And anyway when you bring up claims that havn't gone through the process of which the scientific method works, I'd say the burden is on you to prove that it's true.
I COULD start linking proof that HAVE been tested and peer-reviewed, but the amount of papers is so immense there's little point, It's easier if you do a bit of research of your own.
Lets look at mtDNA...you do know what that is don't you?
Explain to me what mtDNA is then I will sorta understand what you know about genetics then we will work our way out from there. So give me your best definition of mtDNA. If you don't know then just say "Idon't know." then I will explain it to you, then we can do some REAL science.
Of course a 5% difference in DNA proves beyond question that there is no common ancestor between apes and humans, but are you going to still say they are related? Probably so. Thats science!! No common ancestry thats what it means.
Then again you only talk about my ignorance while I am presenting evidence for my position Calling me ignorant doesn't support your position.
Then when you consider the mtDNA my position is further supported. Studies that have used pedigrees or generational mtDNA comparisons have yielded a much more recent common ancestor—even 6,500 years! You could claim population bottleneck, but a population bottleneck is not supported by the evidence.
Your claim is in no way proof against common ancestry. The fact that you think it does, proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Your second statement just shows what a hypocrite you are. You don't believe in the scientific method, even tho it constanty questions and tests any scientific theries, yet you blindly buy what crationist throw at you.
You're not teaching me anything. There has come nothing new out of this discussion, I already knew how ignorant you religious people can be.
And yet again, with the grain of sand.
How many times do I have to say it. Oh well, that's religion for you, ignore what's being said, ignore the proof, just stick to your beliefs about magic.
Yeah, you do seem to be incapable of learning. "Oh well, that's religion for you, ignore what's being said, ignore the proof, just stick to your beliefs about magic. "
I haven't ignored anything I have responded to all of your comments, but all you've said is that I am ignorant. I posted science, but apparently you chose to ignore it.
What are you on about? Creating somthing from nothing and grains of sand?
Just just proves how little you know.
Evolution explains what happened to life after it was formed. Nothing more, nothing less. It says nothing about the big bang if that's what you're implying, nothing about how life STARTED, but how it eveolved.
No, your view of evolution shows that you have bought into a world view that is not at all demonstrated by true science.
And you still haven't made that grain of sand. I'll make it easy for you. Just tell me how a grain of sand can be produced from nothing. You don't have to actually create it just tell me how its done. That should make your task much easier.
So what you're saying is you have no clue what evolution really is; You havn't read any of the evidence to support it, still you categorically deny it because it comes in conflict with what you have been brought up to believe. Instead of doing some research into the matter, you lean on a book written by man some 2 millennia ago, that there is absolutely no evidence to support.
We're talking about evolution here, it's got nothing to do with creating something out of nothing.
You don't even have a clue about how the scientific method works. It's not like darwin one night after a couple of bears just said "hey, I have an idea, evolution through natural selection!" and now everyone just believes that. That is how religion works. Scientific theories are CONSTANTLY being challenged and tested, and yet 150 years after the theory went public, there still is no evidence that contradicts it. But more than 200000 peer-reviewed documents that support it.
Will evolution be called into question now that the similarity of chimpanzee and human DNA has been reduced from >98.5% to ~95%? Probably not. Regardless of whether the similarity was reduced even below 90%, evolutionists would still believe that humans and apes shared a common ancestor
As if you are telling me stuff I have never heard??
But more than 200000 peer-reviewed documents that support it.
BS pure BS they don't support any common ancestry between apes and humans not at all. You really should study the evidence Well I guess since the WERE CREATED it show that God is the only thing they have in common.
"It show that evolutionary science is lunacy and those who teach it are basing there information on methods which cannot be tested by the true scientific method." Wait, say what now?
There are over 200000 peer-reviewed documents supporting evolution.
There isn't a single shred of evidence backing up creationism.
Whoopie do!! And I know you, your ancestry is a gorilla, so that makes you brilliant. You can spew your peer review all you want, I stand by my statement and your peer review is nothng but speculation. there is nothing in any peer reviewed article that shows common ancestry between you and apes....Nothing
BTW Will evolution be called into question now that the similarity of chimpanzee and human DNA has been reduced from >98.5% to ~95%? Probably not. Regardless of whether the similarity was reduced even below 90%, evolutionists would still believe that humans and apes shared a common ancestor.
well i agree that you shouldn't but the way you look and talk doesn't really make you come across as a person intelligent enough to make assuptions about the things you are talking about. i have a really hard time to even judge if you are being serious, so what;'s up. are you serious? atleast we'd know where we'd stand
Its a You Tube video. Yes its serious. It seriously represents how teachers of evolution are polluting the minds of young people. It show that evolutionary science is lunacy and those who teach it are basing there information on methods which cannot be tested by the true scientific method. Yes it seriously questions the veracity of those teaching evolutionary theory.
Take the people for example. According to evolutionary theory people evolved from a lower primate that has common ancestry with chimps and apes, but you can't test that because there in no intermediate to test no valid test in the world can show that human beings evolved from apes.
"So apparently you stayed awake long enough in science class to hear the words "amino acid". That's...longer than I gave you credit for. "
Yes and I've studied the evidence long enough to realize that people like you accept propaganda and bs over real science. Either that or you slept right through genetics and biogenesis, and hence you are completely clueless concerning those subjects.
well considering my previous comment was making fun of you, i don't understand how i was trying to make fun of you. So the correct response would have been "you made fun of me." instead of "you are trying to make fun of me..."
haha that's not me silly, that's the way you sound! sorry if it didn't make sense, i should have spoke in fewer words so that you could understand, my bad!
Why do you talk with fake teeth in your mouth? It makes you hard to understand and they look terrible and people will think this is a joke and not take you seriously.
"Are you one of those people who believe that God did it,"
Yes, I am one of those who like Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, Luis Pastuer, and the many founders of modern science who believe that life is impossible from nonlife apart from an intelligent agent.
Are you one of those voodoo, hocus pocus believers who says it all sprouted up by itself? You are a good laugh for real scientists thats all.
"What? God created the universe, but thats not creationism?"
ah, lets make a distinction here. he believed god made the physical laws and then from that the rest of the universe developed along with humans. creationism is the belief god made everything more or less the way it it.
No creationism is not "the belief god made everything more or less the way it is (sp)."
God didn't create cars or other modern devices such as blenders and sewing machines. Nevertheless, he believed in a creator. Also, his protege Max Planck was a practicing Christian.
Okay now we are moving from creator to specifics. Alright, like Max Planck, Isaac Newton, and and the majority of the founders of modern science I too believe that God created the universe and is a personal savior for all who accept Him.
Jesus Christ was a real historical figure that lived a sinless life. He claimed to be God in the flesh. Then proved it by coming back to life after being dead three days. His birthday is celebrated every year by billions of people all over the world. You can't deny it. You are nothing but a foul mouthed sinner that needs salvation. You mouth tell me everything about what is in your mind...sewage.
what if i told you i`m not even actually an Atheist? No Graighill9 i am not an Atheist,
Making a claim that there is no god is making an appeal towards Ignorance, just as Creationism is. I am Agnostic, i Neither Reject or Accept The existence of a deity, why?
Because absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I simply to not conform your own Personal Religious beliefs.
Craig, your attempts to be ironic have failed, especially considering the fake teeth, the slurred accent, and the lack of social reliability; are qualities attributed to the anti-evolutionists.
Get back to me after you get out of high school. I can refer you to some competent universities that don't spew the evolution mantra and teach REAL OBSERVED science.
Evolution is accepted by the scientific community Period. No escaping it.
all you have left to do is Try and Discredit the entire Community of scientists world wide.
Or you can collect your data, Perform your tests and Bring it Before the community for peer review. If you can do this it shows you have integrity and confidence in your ideas.
"Evolution is accepted by the scientific community Period. No escaping it."
never said it didn't. You have missed my point, because of your emotional disconnect with reality. Your statements are not made from a scientific standpoint; they are made from a metaphysical standpoint. There is no evidence that man has a common ancestor with monkeys.
I'm sorry, but you are too emotional about this subject to hold an intelligent conversation. I have no alternative but to remove your cments and block any further comments from you on this site.
Seriously, what are you calling unbiased? The ones that espouse your particular view? Are these the unbiased ones? how about Ugenie Scott? She is the major gatekeeper of the National Academy of Sciences, and she is one of the most biased asses on the planet. Should I consider those of her ilk as experts? You are the one that should be imparcial and look at the REAL evidence, and stop relying on the conjecture and philosophical arguments.
"Evolution is universally accepted as truth by all except the most inept in soceity."
First off you must explain to me what you mean by evolution. Second if you are saying that everything is the product of common descent from a universal ancestor then you are totally wrong. Third learn to spell society.
Firstly, do you believe that scientists are involved in a conspiracy to hide the truth about evolution? If yes, then why? Secondly, do you believe that God is organic or inorganic?
2 God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship Him in Spirit.
Also, God came to earth as a man. Mary was a virgin who concieved from the Holy Spirit. She gave birth to Jesus. He (Jesus, God in the Flesh) lived a sinless life , was crucified, died, and rose to life again after having been dead for three days. He now sits at the right hand of God, and makes intercession for us. (the short answer)
I'm sorry, but I have trouble comprehending the "Spirit". We can easily sample organic and inorganic matter, but have not yet scientifically measured "Spirit" or a soul in any way. I guess therein lies my difficulty with believing the Bible. I'm not saying I don't believe in God, but how can we be sure that the Bible is right? After all, there have been many religions.
The amount of fulfilled prophecies in the Bible and the odds of them having been fulfilled by chance is one good indicator. Nevertheless, there are many other indicators than this; I would suggest you don't rely on my word for it though, take the time to read it and learn it for yourself.
There aren't any detailed, unambiguous prophecies in the Bible that have been demonstrably fulfilled. I know you're referring to the 100s of prophecies Jesus supposedly fulfilled, but there's no evidence suggesting that he did, or that he even existed... except for the Bible itself.
"There aren't any detailed, unambiguous prophecies in the Bible that have been demonstrably fulfilled. I know you're referring to the 100s of prophecies Jesus supposedly fulfilled, but there's no evidence suggesting that he did, or that he even existed... except for the Bible itself."
Feel free to give even one example of a fulfilled prophecy. I've read the Bible, many parts of it more than once, and I've not been convinced. So please, one example of a detailed, unambiguous prophecy, and an independent source verifying its fulfillment. There are supposedly more than 2,000, so this should be easy for you.
Well, if you have read the Bible many times and aren't convinced then there is no way I can convince you so you can run along about your merry little business.
great comeback shows your complete ability to avoid and bury factual information. I think it must be due to you preconcieved brainwashing that causes you to reject things that interfere with your world view, even when the physical evidence backs the claim.
Yes te egyptians drew pictures of mythical beings and when one studies the mythical beings they are drawn in the context of being mythical. Yet there are many other drawings in caves, on walls, and on artifacts that depict actual creatures which are depictions of what we would call dinosaurs.
Another thing. For life to exist in the simplest single cell you need at least 397 genes. You must jump from 0 to 397 in a single shot. Tell me how this happens naturally.
"also infants were found with the remains which further indicates it was their natural habitat."
Sorry, but it indicates that this was not a mine or digging site. The discovery shows that placement the placement of the bodies in the sediment was consisten with having been washed there by a flood.
In 1971 in LaSalle Utah the complete skeletons of fully formed humans were found in 15ft of Dakota sandstone sediment which some scientists had dated 95 -96 million years old. First there were
He's got such a neatly trimmed goatee, but he doesn't fix his teeth. lmao
SBRslacker00 1 year ago
Um, if the information in living things is ASTRONOMICALLY LESS than the information in the supposed Designer, then how does it make sense to argue that the information in living organisms is too great to come into existence, so there must have been a Designer???
DNAunion 1 year ago
Still responding huh?...figures.
You posted hostility then when I resond you get your panties all twisted and call more names...figures...I would expect nothing less from a moron. Go bark up someone else's tree you dirt bag idiot. If you make another post I will delete all of your posts and block your screen name you douche bag moron.
Craighill9 2 years ago
Delete this you inbred moron.
foxlake02 2 years ago 7
no problem you sick piece of pig excrement
Craighill9 2 years ago
You are the one responding to it...what does that make you? Yeah if it was irrelevant you wouldn't have found it worth responding to, but you responded....fool.
Craighill9 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The irony is this:
That this guy is probably more intelligent than the whole Evolutionary system combined.
FirebrandNIRE 2 years ago
Yeah, Its about as brilliant as those who claim there is a common ancestor between humans and chimps. It uses the same basic logic and reasoning as those who make that claim.
Craighill9 2 years ago
When you give a retard the internet: The True Story
beyondbedandbathisme 2 years ago 19
Got to be satire.
TraskNari 2 years ago
You're on FSTDT.
RottenKnight 2 years ago 6
Which one are you... the big dot or the little dot?(just kidding)
janken919 2 years ago
You're almost as good as Edward Current :p
Pinokio131 2 years ago
oh my god
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
you fucking redneck. What the hell is wrong with your teeth? Your dress sense and your brain?
jesus fucking christ I can't stop laughing at how disgusting you are.
crazy right wing nutcase.
prierprierprier 2 years ago 4
aint those fake teeth? L
generaldesor 2 years ago
He starts off trying to do a parody about scientists who believe the theory of evolution and then he goes into abiogenesis. Then he butchers that theory by saying the first life form was a bacteria. Only creationists believe bacteria just popped into existence. I guess the parody is really about creationists.
foxlake02 2 years ago 4
Yeah I shoulda said it was algae...Yeah that woulda worked better cuz algae is in water too...yeah thats it it was algae. ..THEN bacteria...yeah thats it algae then bacteria...that makes more sense. ...first matter then algae then bacteria...yeah thats how it works uh huh. yeah
Craighill9 2 years ago
@Craighill9
No, that makes no sense. Algae are eukaryotes, which are more complex than bacteria, which are prokaryotes.
DNAunion 1 year ago
This Mexican understands your english, get down homies. I wish Dawkins could see this, I would pay 100 dollars or 20.000 pesos and a sack of weed to see the look on his face.
benthemiester 2 years ago 2
For the huge facepalm?
Cyllid 2 years ago
ya sure, why not.
benthemiester 2 years ago
I couldn't decide if it was to see horror (because you think this disproved evolution.)
Facepalming at the sheer idiocy.
Or some other reaction. Lol.
Cyllid 2 years ago 7
You better tell Silvia Brown that you want your money back, because your psychic abilities suck. Ive never said the list was proof of anything. so you might want to save yourself the trouble of wasting all your energy lol. I think its time to take out the FACEPALM.
benthemiester 2 years ago
And yet, you never explained what the expression on his face would be, or why he would have it.
My personal opinion about what would happen is a facepalm, and was merely presenting another possibility, the two most obvious that I could think of. What other expressions would he likely have?
I did not mean to imply you thought that, I meant that horror would make sense IF you believed that. I apologize for the inadequacies of English language, and lack of sleep.
Cyllid 2 years ago
I didnt realize I was required to explain his facial expressions. This is whats called a parody, as unflatering as it is to the simple /just so/ dogma that make up evolutionary theory. If your interested in my oponion on the dissent list, I have posted them on donexedus dissent post for the last couple of days. I think don decided to entitle it "scienist who reject evolution" wich really is a misnomer since evolution can mean either macro or micro to different people.
benthemiester 2 years ago
Sorry me dumb mexican, but please tell me something... is this english what he is talking?
eurabio 2 years ago
You are totally nuts. Would you mind telling me"what argument" is bogus ? What statement did I make, that you proved wrong ?
Philos2006 2 years ago 3
All of them.
Craighill9 2 years ago
Go and play with your marbles, if you are intelligent enough to do that.
You can`t even spell, or use spellcheck.
Philos2006 2 years ago 3
"You can`t even spell, or use spellcheck."
Maybe not, but even with poor spelling I have shown that your argument is bogus.
Craighill9 2 years ago
I'm sorry, but I don't see any evidence for your position hear. All I see is emotional ranting and bellyachin. All i ask was just a simple grain of sand.
Craighill9 2 years ago
The biggist brain of any scientist still falls short of the capability to figure out what existance is. No joke. It's true.
Dejavu12321 3 years ago
what?
Craighill9 3 years ago
You still haven't show that you are familiar with mtDNA. Nor have you presented ANY argument for your position. Therefore if you continue to make these nonsensical posts that contain simpleminded blather, I will have to delete your posts and block your comments.
Now post just one article that shows that common ancestry between apes and man is science.
Craighill9 3 years ago
I know about mitochondrial DNA. And I know what "reserch" you refer to. It is produced by creationists. It has nothing to do with science. It has not been peer-reviewed. It's jibberish. Made up by people that doesn't follow the scientific method in their "reserch".
You CAN trust the scientific method, because the whole point of it, the way it works, is by trying to disprove the proposed theory/hypothesis, whatever it may be. In this case the theory of evolution..
schlippien 3 years ago 4
The theory of evolution have been up for this kind of testing for 150 years, more than 200000 peer-reviewed papers exist on the subject, covering just about every conceivable part of the theory, and they all support it.
The theory still holds water. There is not a single paper that contradicts it.
schlippien 3 years ago 4
Several famous creationists themselves have clearly stated that if there was any evidence that contradicted what they believed or what was in the bible, they refuse it.
And you talk about REAL science? REALLY?
schlippien 3 years ago 3
Yeah, and I can trust that you know what mtDNA is by your inability to spell the word research.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Ah, why am I not surprised. You really keep sinking lower and lower don't you.
I made a typo, and because of that I can't possibly know anything about mitochondrial DNA?
Following your "logic"; If a simple typo holds that much "power", all the false information, blantant lies, hypocrisy and ignorance from the creationists surely must mean that you don't know shit about anything.
Oh wait, you actually don't, and you just keep proving this over and over.
schlippien 3 years ago 3
Funny how some seem to think that calling me names somehow supports their position concerning evolution
Craighill9 3 years ago
And this comes from the guy that thought putting in fake teeth and making himself sound and look like a hillbilly would support HIS claims against evolution. Oh boy you're just priceless :]
schlippien 3 years ago 4
You still haven't presented any evidence for your position. this leads me to believe that you don't know anything about evolution and what is shows and what is doesn't show. You fail
Craighill9 3 years ago
So you want me to personally list all the proof of evolution (as mentioned more than 200000 papers) otherwise you won't believe it?
Yet the bible, a book written by man two millennia ago, you swallow without questions.
Priceless
schlippien 3 years ago 2
"So you want me to personally list all the proof of evolution"
No, just show me one paper that refutes the evidence I presented to you...just one.
You are the one who brought up the Bible...not me
Craighill9 3 years ago
What did your claim prove? Even tho it's false, it certainly doesn't disprove the fact that humans and chimps share common ancestor.
And anyway when you bring up claims that havn't gone through the process of which the scientific method works, I'd say the burden is on you to prove that it's true.
I COULD start linking proof that HAVE been tested and peer-reviewed, but the amount of papers is so immense there's little point, It's easier if you do a bit of research of your own.
schlippien 3 years ago
"it certainly doesn't disprove the fact that humans and chimps share common ancestor."
Sure it does.
"I COULD start linking proof that HAVE been tested and peer-reviewed, but the amount of papers is so immense there's little point, "
I simply asked for one the specifically refutes the mtDNA evidence...but its just as I thought...nothing.
Also, where's that grain of sand?
Craighill9 3 years ago
You a comedian?
schlippien 3 years ago
Lets look at mtDNA...you do know what that is don't you?
Explain to me what mtDNA is then I will sorta understand what you know about genetics then we will work our way out from there. So give me your best definition of mtDNA. If you don't know then just say "Idon't know." then I will explain it to you, then we can do some REAL science.
Craighill9 3 years ago
I already replied to this, but okay I'm gonna repeat myself.
Evolution is constantly being questioned and tested. That's how science works.
schlippien 3 years ago
Of course a 5% difference in DNA proves beyond question that there is no common ancestor between apes and humans, but are you going to still say they are related? Probably so. Thats science!! No common ancestry thats what it means.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Your ignorance is so staggering I'm just lost for words.
If you knew anything about genetics you would know that this claim is so ridiculous it almost hurts.
schlippien 3 years ago
Then again you only talk about my ignorance while I am presenting evidence for my position Calling me ignorant doesn't support your position.
Then when you consider the mtDNA my position is further supported. Studies that have used pedigrees or generational mtDNA comparisons have yielded a much more recent common ancestor—even 6,500 years! You could claim population bottleneck, but a population bottleneck is not supported by the evidence.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Your claim is in no way proof against common ancestry. The fact that you think it does, proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Your second statement just shows what a hypocrite you are. You don't believe in the scientific method, even tho it constanty questions and tests any scientific theries, yet you blindly buy what crationist throw at you.
schlippien 3 years ago
Not to mention that you can't spell worth crap.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Did you make the grain of sand yet?
Craighill9 3 years ago
"Your second statement just shows what a hypocrite you are. You don't believe in the scientific method,"
Apparently you've ignored my posts concerning ape and human DNA and mtDNA of humans? If you have a rebutal to this evidence then present it.
Craighill9 3 years ago
I still don't see that grain of sand or the explanation of its appearance from nothing
Craighill9 3 years ago
Funny I am teaching you genetics while you are callin me ignorant thats funny.
Craighill9 3 years ago
You're not teaching me anything. There has come nothing new out of this discussion, I already knew how ignorant you religious people can be.
And yet again, with the grain of sand.
How many times do I have to say it. Oh well, that's religion for you, ignore what's being said, ignore the proof, just stick to your beliefs about magic.
schlippien 3 years ago 2
You're not teaching me anything.
Yeah, you do seem to be incapable of learning. "Oh well, that's religion for you, ignore what's being said, ignore the proof, just stick to your beliefs about magic. "
I haven't ignored anything I have responded to all of your comments, but all you've said is that I am ignorant. I posted science, but apparently you chose to ignore it.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Aaah, I get it, sarcasm.
Well I got to admit, you're pretty funny.
schlippien 3 years ago
What are you on about? Creating somthing from nothing and grains of sand?
Just just proves how little you know.
Evolution explains what happened to life after it was formed. Nothing more, nothing less. It says nothing about the big bang if that's what you're implying, nothing about how life STARTED, but how it eveolved.
schlippien 3 years ago
No, your view of evolution shows that you have bought into a world view that is not at all demonstrated by true science.
And you still haven't made that grain of sand. I'll make it easy for you. Just tell me how a grain of sand can be produced from nothing. You don't have to actually create it just tell me how its done. That should make your task much easier.
Craighill9 3 years ago
So what you're saying is you have no clue what evolution really is; You havn't read any of the evidence to support it, still you categorically deny it because it comes in conflict with what you have been brought up to believe. Instead of doing some research into the matter, you lean on a book written by man some 2 millennia ago, that there is absolutely no evidence to support.
We're talking about evolution here, it's got nothing to do with creating something out of nothing.
schlippien 3 years ago
You don't even have a clue about how the scientific method works. It's not like darwin one night after a couple of bears just said "hey, I have an idea, evolution through natural selection!" and now everyone just believes that. That is how religion works. Scientific theories are CONSTANTLY being challenged and tested, and yet 150 years after the theory went public, there still is no evidence that contradicts it. But more than 200000 peer-reviewed documents that support it.
schlippien 3 years ago
Will evolution be called into question now that the similarity of chimpanzee and human DNA has been reduced from >98.5% to ~95%? Probably not. Regardless of whether the similarity was reduced even below 90%, evolutionists would still believe that humans and apes shared a common ancestor
Craighill9 3 years ago
Still no grain of sand huh?
Didn't think so. Just more pseudo science
As if you are telling me stuff I have never heard??
But more than 200000 peer-reviewed documents that support it.
BS pure BS they don't support any common ancestry between apes and humans not at all. You really should study the evidence Well I guess since the WERE CREATED it show that God is the only thing they have in common.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Your delusion is most amusing.
Yes there ARE proof of evolution.
No there is NO proof of your god.
And still with the grains of sand.
But go ahead, live in your little bubble. Atleast it makes for great comedy.
schlippien 3 years ago
"It show that evolutionary science is lunacy and those who teach it are basing there information on methods which cannot be tested by the true scientific method." Wait, say what now?
There are over 200000 peer-reviewed documents supporting evolution.
There isn't a single shred of evidence backing up creationism.
schlippien 3 years ago
Whoopie do!! And I know you, your ancestry is a gorilla, so that makes you brilliant. You can spew your peer review all you want, I stand by my statement and your peer review is nothng but speculation. there is nothing in any peer reviewed article that shows common ancestry between you and apes....Nothing
Craighill9 3 years ago
Yes, there is.
schlippien 3 years ago
I tell you what when you can create a grain of sand from nothing, I'll find your argument credible.
Craighill9 3 years ago
What's sand got to do with anything?
It's funny really. There are tons of evidence supporting evolution, not a single bit of evidence against it.
There is not a shred of evidence backing your beliefs what so ever.
The fact that you don't understand something, doesn't mean it's not true.
schlippien 3 years ago
Haven't created anything from nothing huh? Didn't think so. Just one grain of sand from nothing and your argument is credible.
Craighill9 3 years ago
BTW Will evolution be called into question now that the similarity of chimpanzee and human DNA has been reduced from >98.5% to ~95%? Probably not. Regardless of whether the similarity was reduced even below 90%, evolutionists would still believe that humans and apes shared a common ancestor.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Evolution is constantly being questioned and tested. That's how science works.
schlippien 3 years ago
whats with the fake teeth? that doesnt make you sound more truthfull
Zuurkool1 3 years ago
Not really worried about appearances.
Craighill9 3 years ago
well i agree that you shouldn't but the way you look and talk doesn't really make you come across as a person intelligent enough to make assuptions about the things you are talking about. i have a really hard time to even judge if you are being serious, so what;'s up. are you serious? atleast we'd know where we'd stand
Zuurkool1 3 years ago
Its a You Tube video. Yes its serious. It seriously represents how teachers of evolution are polluting the minds of young people. It show that evolutionary science is lunacy and those who teach it are basing there information on methods which cannot be tested by the true scientific method. Yes it seriously questions the veracity of those teaching evolutionary theory.
Craighill9 3 years ago
ok so you say their methods cannot be tested by true scientific method. give me an example of that.
Zuurkool1 3 years ago 4
The burden is on you not me
Craighill9 3 years ago
Take the people for example. According to evolutionary theory people evolved from a lower primate that has common ancestry with chimps and apes, but you can't test that because there in no intermediate to test no valid test in the world can show that human beings evolved from apes.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"So apparently you stayed awake long enough in science class to hear the words "amino acid". That's...longer than I gave you credit for. "
Yes and I've studied the evidence long enough to realize that people like you accept propaganda and bs over real science. Either that or you slept right through genetics and biogenesis, and hence you are completely clueless concerning those subjects.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"people like you accept propaganda and bs over real science."
"Real science" like the universe being made in 6 days and humans coming from dirt?
mordredt02 3 years ago 2
"Real science" like the universe being made in 6 days and humans coming from dirt?"
You are also accepting ignorant propaganda concerning what the Bible says. Read it yourself before you claim to know what it says.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"You are also accepting ignorant propaganda concerning what the Bible says. Read it yourself before you claim to know what it says."
The bible does say that the universe was made in 6 days and that god made Adam out of dirt. Not sure what bible you're reading.
mordredt02 3 years ago
Nonsemse, Genesis 1 does not mention the universe
Craighill9 3 years ago
So do you think the universe doesn't exist?
mordredt02 3 years ago
Hang on there captain. First go see what Genesis 1 says then get back to me.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Same thing it said the last time I read it, probably.
mordredt02 3 years ago
"Same thing it said the last time I read it, probably. "
Apparently your problem is not reading; your problem is comprehension.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"Wow! Your pastor must be proud. You followed his explanation of how evolution works perfectly. "
And you believe it too huh?
Craighill9 3 years ago
Wow! Your pastor must be proud. You followed his explanation of how evolution works perfectly.
jedum1 3 years ago
Craig is a closet homosexual.
click on the side here,
"Craighill9's Little Secret"
You inbred mother fucker. Nice teeth on you! Has anyone kicked a field goal between your chicklets asswipe?
fitasafiddle123 3 years ago
Typical. you can lead an atheist to truth but you can't make him think. When you graduate kindergarten then you can comment on my video.
Craighill9 3 years ago
nice, that was a very creative response, my 6th grade sister could have came up with a better response than that! your pathetic.
fireman872 3 years ago
well considering my previous comment was making fun of you, i don't understand how i was trying to make fun of you. So the correct response would have been "you made fun of me." instead of "you are trying to make fun of me..."
fireman872 3 years ago
No you were showing that you are an idiot.
Craighill9 3 years ago
haha that's not me silly, that's the way you sound! sorry if it didn't make sense, i should have spoke in fewer words so that you could understand, my bad!
fireman872 3 years ago
Oh, I get it you are trying to make fun of me...oh hahahha.That's a good argument...not.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Drr ima stupid person. i think i... wait i forgot.. um,,,, oh yeah i like sheep and guns lol
You have got to be kidding, i hope this guy is a joke!
fireman872 3 years ago
I agree with your first sentence...yes you display those characteristics.
Craighill9 3 years ago
isn't that craighill guy the biggest weirdo ever or what? And he wants to argue evolution?
zmart4ever 3 years ago
..how long were you stuck in your mothers birth canal and was the umbilical cord wrapped around your neck very long?
fitasafiddle123 3 years ago
yes, and i think he was dropped on his head a few times too
fireman872 3 years ago
Why do you talk with fake teeth in your mouth? It makes you hard to understand and they look terrible and people will think this is a joke and not take you seriously.
araleztri 3 years ago
hahahahaahhahahahahaha
Did you know that global warming is caused by cattle farts? and Algore invented the internet? The teeth are real.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Was this meant to be a parody, or a parody of a parody? Watching this video I'm more confused than anything else!
TheMathGuy 3 years ago
"Are you one of those people who believe that God did it,"
Yes, I am one of those who like Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, Luis Pastuer, and the many founders of modern science who believe that life is impossible from nonlife apart from an intelligent agent.
Are you one of those voodoo, hocus pocus believers who says it all sprouted up by itself? You are a good laugh for real scientists thats all.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"Yes, I am one of those who like Albert Einstein"
Einstein didn't believe in god in the same way you did, he believed in god as in nature not a personal god or intelligence.
spynija92704 3 years ago 2
So?
Craighill9 3 years ago
That creationists lie to promote their ideas.
spynija92704 3 years ago
"That creationists lie to promote their ideas."
And scientists don't?...yeah right.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Eistein believed that there had to be a creator. the type of creator he believed in is irrelevant.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"the type of creator he believed in is irrelevant."
allow me to respectfully disagree. He believed in a deistic or pantheistic god who may have started the universe but let it continue naturalisticly.
This is where your comparison fails, you may both believed in a god but he did not believe in creationism.
jtyranus 3 years ago
What? God created the universe, but thats not creationism? uh....yeah that makes sense... if your an imbecile.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"What? God created the universe, but thats not creationism?"
ah, lets make a distinction here. he believed god made the physical laws and then from that the rest of the universe developed along with humans. creationism is the belief god made everything more or less the way it it.
"that makes sense... if your an imbecile."
hey, lets not get emotional here.
jtyranus 3 years ago
that was supposed to be
"god made everything more or less the way it *is*"
sorry about that.
jtyranus 3 years ago
No creationism is not "the belief god made everything more or less the way it is (sp)."
God didn't create cars or other modern devices such as blenders and sewing machines. Nevertheless, he believed in a creator. Also, his protege Max Planck was a practicing Christian.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"God didn't create cars or other modern devices"
covered under the 'more or less' part.
"Also, his protege Max Planck was a practicing Christian."
and interesting factoid, but irrelevant to Einsteins views.
jtyranus 3 years ago
"Nevertheless, he believed in a creator"
yeah but his belief of creationism was consistent with the available evidence.
while he may have believed a creator, he certainly didnt believe creationism.
creationism being defined as "the religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe were created in their original form by a deity"
jtyranus 3 years ago
Okay now we are moving from creator to specifics. Alright, like Max Planck, Isaac Newton, and and the majority of the founders of modern science I too believe that God created the universe and is a personal savior for all who accept Him.
Craighill9 3 years ago
OK. that seems a little more accurate.
jtyranus 3 years ago
No, when he stated creator he meant something without intelligence that wasn't personal which is nature.
spynija92704 3 years ago
Is this meant to be mocking scientists or Christians who mock scientists?
theshredator 3 years ago
This is meant to mock pseudo scientist who claim that abiogenesis is real science and who claim that life is the result of naturalistic phenomena.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Everything is the result of Naturalistic Phenomena, Otherwise its supernatural.
If your god was real he would not be supernatural be default and there for Once again The origin of life becomes a Natural Phenomena.
Your Knowledge of this Seems shifty at best.
Nothings wrong with Believing in god mind you.
My whole family does, there just not Creationist Nut jobs.
Cnidarious 3 years ago 2
"The origin of life becomes a Natural Phenomena."
Jesus Christ was a real historical figure that lived a sinless life. He claimed to be God in the flesh. Then proved it by coming back to life after being dead three days. His birthday is celebrated every year by billions of people all over the world. You can't deny it. You are nothing but a foul mouthed sinner that needs salvation. You mouth tell me everything about what is in your mind...sewage.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Foul mouthed?
your the one who's now talking about sewage.
what if i told you i`m not even actually an Atheist? No Graighill9 i am not an Atheist,
Making a claim that there is no god is making an appeal towards Ignorance, just as Creationism is. I am Agnostic, i Neither Reject or Accept The existence of a deity, why?
Because absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I simply to not conform your own Personal Religious beliefs.
As for my Area of Study, Marine Biology.
Cnidarious 3 years ago
I love you craig
BadAcidVacation 3 years ago
I hope you have the best Christmas ever.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Craig, your attempts to be ironic have failed, especially considering the fake teeth, the slurred accent, and the lack of social reliability; are qualities attributed to the anti-evolutionists.
/Keep crying Craig
//For you tears nourish my soul
snipzor 3 years ago
You sound as you are personally offended. I'm sowwy if I hurted yur wittle fillins.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Get back to me after you get out of high school. I can refer you to some competent universities that don't spew the evolution mantra and teach REAL OBSERVED science.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Sorry but those Universities do not exist.
Evolution is accepted by the scientific community Period. No escaping it.
all you have left to do is Try and Discredit the entire Community of scientists world wide.
Or you can collect your data, Perform your tests and Bring it Before the community for peer review. If you can do this it shows you have integrity and confidence in your ideas.
Cnidarious 3 years ago
"Evolution is accepted by the scientific community Period. No escaping it."
never said it didn't. You have missed my point, because of your emotional disconnect with reality. Your statements are not made from a scientific standpoint; they are made from a metaphysical standpoint. There is no evidence that man has a common ancestor with monkeys.
Craighill9 3 years ago
In what area of science do you actually study?
Have you got anything?
Cnidarious 3 years ago
I'm sorry, but you are too emotional about this subject to hold an intelligent conversation. I have no alternative but to remove your cments and block any further comments from you on this site.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Seriously, what are you calling unbiased? The ones that espouse your particular view? Are these the unbiased ones? how about Ugenie Scott? She is the major gatekeeper of the National Academy of Sciences, and she is one of the most biased asses on the planet. Should I consider those of her ilk as experts? You are the one that should be imparcial and look at the REAL evidence, and stop relying on the conjecture and philosophical arguments.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"Prove to me Jesus "died and came back to life" with 100% undeniable proof."
Nah..Your time is too precious to be wasted reading what I say.
Craighill9 3 years ago
I happen to have a lot of time to spare right now, I'd like to read your proof.
fredmachine 3 years ago
Evolution is universally accepted as truth by all except the most inept in soceity.
Smithson445 3 years ago 5
"Evolution is universally accepted as truth by all except the most inept in soceity."
First off you must explain to me what you mean by evolution. Second if you are saying that everything is the product of common descent from a universal ancestor then you are totally wrong. Third learn to spell society.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"As expected.Now whose the ignorant one?"
He's right, You are. Now I'm gonna delete your ignorance and block your posts...see ya.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"As expected.Now whose the ignorant one?"
You are
straightarrow50 3 years ago
Your ignorance is being removed
Craighill9 3 years ago
ur such a retard craighill9. just shut up and leave the facts to the competent people in this world not u
jbeaman848 3 years ago
Calling people retard is a good defense for your position
straightarrow50 3 years ago
I sincerely hope this video is a joke....
interfluv 3 years ago
Firstly, do you believe that scientists are involved in a conspiracy to hide the truth about evolution? If yes, then why? Secondly, do you believe that God is organic or inorganic?
NinjaWeekend 3 years ago
1. No.
2 God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship Him in Spirit.
Also, God came to earth as a man. Mary was a virgin who concieved from the Holy Spirit. She gave birth to Jesus. He (Jesus, God in the Flesh) lived a sinless life , was crucified, died, and rose to life again after having been dead for three days. He now sits at the right hand of God, and makes intercession for us. (the short answer)
Craighill9 3 years ago
I'm sorry, but I have trouble comprehending the "Spirit". We can easily sample organic and inorganic matter, but have not yet scientifically measured "Spirit" or a soul in any way. I guess therein lies my difficulty with believing the Bible. I'm not saying I don't believe in God, but how can we be sure that the Bible is right? After all, there have been many religions.
NinjaWeekend 3 years ago
"but how can we be sure that the Bible is right?"
The amount of fulfilled prophecies in the Bible and the odds of them having been fulfilled by chance is one good indicator. Nevertheless, there are many other indicators than this; I would suggest you don't rely on my word for it though, take the time to read it and learn it for yourself.
Craighill9 3 years ago
There aren't any detailed, unambiguous prophecies in the Bible that have been demonstrably fulfilled. I know you're referring to the 100s of prophecies Jesus supposedly fulfilled, but there's no evidence suggesting that he did, or that he even existed... except for the Bible itself.
sickink2 3 years ago 3
"There aren't any detailed, unambiguous prophecies in the Bible that have been demonstrably fulfilled. I know you're referring to the 100s of prophecies Jesus supposedly fulfilled, but there's no evidence suggesting that he did, or that he even existed... except for the Bible itself."
Your ignorance is duly noted
Craighill9 3 years ago
Feel free to give even one example of a fulfilled prophecy. I've read the Bible, many parts of it more than once, and I've not been convinced. So please, one example of a detailed, unambiguous prophecy, and an independent source verifying its fulfillment. There are supposedly more than 2,000, so this should be easy for you.
sickink2 3 years ago 2
Well, if you have read the Bible many times and aren't convinced then there is no way I can convince you so you can run along about your merry little business.
Craighill9 3 years ago
I tried to be nice now I'll just block your silly comments
Craighill9 3 years ago
Your post content is the reason it is deleted. I don't allow the posts of nonthinkers to pollute my comments section.
Craighill9 3 years ago
I'm sorry since you continue to spew ignorance I must now delete your messages and block your posts
Craighill9 3 years ago
Stop with the ignoranced
Craighill9 3 years ago
Wrong again virus are not life
Craighill9 3 years ago
viruses are not life. They are not cells. I said simplest cell.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"rubbish"
great comeback shows your complete ability to avoid and bury factual information. I think it must be due to you preconcieved brainwashing that causes you to reject things that interfere with your world view, even when the physical evidence backs the claim.
Craighill9 3 years ago
Yes te egyptians drew pictures of mythical beings and when one studies the mythical beings they are drawn in the context of being mythical. Yet there are many other drawings in caves, on walls, and on artifacts that depict actual creatures which are depictions of what we would call dinosaurs.
Craighill9 3 years ago
LOL Wow proof of the evolution of intelligent design, outstanding work!
GHLemaitre 3 years ago
Another thing. For life to exist in the simplest single cell you need at least 397 genes. You must jump from 0 to 397 in a single shot. Tell me how this happens naturally.
Craighill9 3 years ago
"also infants were found with the remains which further indicates it was their natural habitat."
Sorry, but it indicates that this was not a mine or digging site. The discovery shows that placement the placement of the bodies in the sediment was consisten with having been washed there by a flood.
Craighill9 3 years ago
In 1971 in LaSalle Utah the complete skeletons of fully formed humans were found in 15ft of Dakota sandstone sediment which some scientists had dated 95 -96 million years old. First there were