Thank-you Dr. David Suzuki, for speaking the truth.....it is unfortunate that our own Conservative Govt under Stephen Harper still doesnt "get it".....but thats what happens when you are beholden to the fundamentalist Christian right, and his cronies in the Alberta oil patch....
and is it more terrifying that this has 2903 views and charlie bit my finger has 231 million. maybe the media got it right - we are more interested in charlie's finger - sigh
The biosphere will not die within 100 years, but it will in time. As it should, over the coming centuries the old world will fade away and be replaced by one designed by and for mankind. With nuclear breeder reactors, photoelectric cells, and geothermal turbine generators we will have more than enough energy to complete our redesign of this world. Abandon the weak flesh, rejoice in the freedom and purity of steel. There is no certainty in flesh, but death. Ave Machina
Humanities impact is all around you. Deforestation, polluted oceans, polluted fresh water, which is only 2% of the water on the planet and is detrimental to life, industrialized food systems, inhumane feed lots, accelerating loss of diversity, and the list could go on and on. You have had the wool pulled over your eyes in the name of profits. How ignorant do you have to be to convince yourself that Suzuki is a lying thief? If you had half his education you would only begin to see the light.
David stated that in 1990 the leading scientists issued a dire warning, & that within 10 years or so catestrophic events would occur & that 16 years later, he didn't state which catestrophic events occured or not...odd...
You heard that wrong, he did not say that catastrophic event would occur in 10 years, he the chance to AVOID catastrophic events in the future would be lost in 10 years...meaning that we are currently waiting for an environmental catastrophe.
Ice caps melted before man existed. Temperatures rose before man existed. We have proof what happened in the past, but no proof of what will happen in the future. Just the alarmists....that's all we have. And the alarmists like Suzuki have been living high off the hog and stinking the planet up, and now they want us to change the world AND pay them for this advice...:). In the 70's, all the mentors of the present day thieves were saying there was an impending ice age...DUHHH
Read anything on his bio. After he abandoned science many many years ago, he has done nothing but advocate an extreme position on the environmental issue. Show me what he has done that isn't advocating an extreme position on the environment.
Just because he has a PhD that doesn't mean he isn't a lying thief. He's had the wool over people's eyes for years, travelling around the globe and keeping 2 houses and living with a huge carbon footprint and now he wants us all to be not like him? The guy should be thrown in jail with Al Gore. And make them share a toilet and bed, that will reform them hopefully
Ok, so you're not going to answer my question then. You've resorted to ad-hominem attacks instead of telling me why you doubt anthropogenic global warming. I didn't ask you in jest - I was honestly wondering about your opinion - what it is, and how you came about it.
So I'll ask again: what scientific data has led you to doubt the claims of the scientific community that global warming is anthropogenic in nature?
What proof do you have that global warming exists? We've recently come to know that scientists in England feel the need to cover up data when it doesn't conform to what they are telling us. Also, how do you explain the fact that Greenland was once a lush rainforest? And there was no man back then. How about ice ages? Man didn't cause global cooling. It's all part of natural cycles. Man has nothing to do with temperatures, unless there are thousands packed into a room.
What proof? The temperatures are getting warmer? Duh? Ever looked at the melting polar ice caps? Or receding glaciers?
How do I explain Greenland once being a lush rainforest? How about climate change, dude? No one is disputing that natural cycles have played their part.
But carbon dioxide absorbs the longwave radiation heading back to space in the form of heat, so as we add more CO2, there's more material absorbing this heat. We're "indirectly" warming the planet.
So tell me then...why this increase of one degree over the past 50 years...are you following?....tell me with indisputable proof how you can be sure that this isn't a natural warming pattern. Just because man is present during this one it doesn't mean that this one is man-caused. Come on Mr. Duh, Mr Insulter. Greenland might become a lush rain forest again. How can we be positive that if man does everything these crooks want us to that we can stop these minute increases in temperature. To you.
See, he was wrong, there isn't any climate change, or we'd have floods everywhere, and hurricanes and typhoons; I haven't seen this on the nightly news, so it just isn't happening, is it?
I was being ironic - Americans don't get any of the real news about the fires of Australia, the floods in Europe, the droughts in Africa, etc. An American has to watch Russia Today, BBC, even Al Jazeera to find out about what is happening. Thanks to YouTube there is more than CNN.
He won the alterntive Nobel prize today!! The Right Livelyhood ward 2009 :)
Mr . Suzuki will accept the award at at ceremont at the Swedish governments head quarters 'Riksdagen ' on the 4 Dec. 2009. Well deserved and well done.!
Suzuki is merely pasing on whats now widely known as fact .
He is right in being mad at the perspective and the dumb assed short term priorities of the the major news carriers. They are too old school and corportate and should be made aware of it, like he is doing here.
its supposed to be a free society in whcih we live , not one where celebrities and rumors make the headlines . its sad that its taken solong . maybe we have blown it because of that .
As a media student we're taught that the media/television is a follower not a leader. The dilemma is TV produces what ppl want to watch, so this goes back to the ppl more than the media's responsibility.
738 views is also terrifying, I hope more poeple see this and that even more people understand it. Your daily lives won't matter when your dead with no environment left to reincarnate into.
it's not overpopulation thats the problem, it bad organization, check out over population, all the poeple in the world would fit into Jacksonville Florida. the world isn't overpopulated, it's just very, very poorley organized how we live.
This is a very stupid , crazy, comparison , check the footprint! And you discover we use more than one earth. Because we are legio and use factor 2000 more than we give back to the earth. It must be equal by reducing our numbers drastic and very fast.
That is a possible solution, if we don't destroy the earth in the process trying to bring our numbers down. If we were to use biological agents to acheive this, theres always a chance it could get out of hand, wipe our species out entirely, and/or wipe out other forms of life on the planet. I don't think destructive action is the solution. According to many models, the earth can sustain possibly 12-14 billion humans, with humans living neutral to the environment. Not living as we are now though.
Your right, urban sprawl and poor urban development lead to inefficient land use. In terms of the worlds carying capacity, estimates range from 1 to 1000 billion in terms of population. It comes down to this: will population growth ever excede human innovation that allows to obtain and use our resources more efficiently and effectively.
I understand your point on human inovation. I beleive however that the innovation has existed for a long, long time, but human social circumstances, also with the priorities and traditions of the ruling elites, have sent us down this horrible path. Whats even scarier is that they may be even doing it on purpose. Unless swift revolution takes hold, I think we're fucked.
fair enough, although swift revolution might not even be necessary, there is a lot of hope in the European countries. Relative to North America, they are much more efficient, effective, competent in terms of public administration. The most heartening thing about Europe is voter turnout and political literacy, and I believe one begets the other in terms of competent governing. Ignorant population allow for incompetent rule.
Thank-you Dr. David Suzuki, for speaking the truth.....it is unfortunate that our own Conservative Govt under Stephen Harper still doesnt "get it".....but thats what happens when you are beholden to the fundamentalist Christian right, and his cronies in the Alberta oil patch....
Signed, a Former Conservative(in recovery)
FMHammyJ 11 months ago 3
This has really opened my eyes, I guess the media does after all report things that won't have any significance in the future of man kind...
TeensForTheBetter 11 months ago
and is it more terrifying that this has 2903 views and charlie bit my finger has 231 million. maybe the media got it right - we are more interested in charlie's finger - sigh
paultmckay 1 year ago 2
The biosphere will not die within 100 years, but it will in time. As it should, over the coming centuries the old world will fade away and be replaced by one designed by and for mankind. With nuclear breeder reactors, photoelectric cells, and geothermal turbine generators we will have more than enough energy to complete our redesign of this world. Abandon the weak flesh, rejoice in the freedom and purity of steel. There is no certainty in flesh, but death. Ave Machina
12345combination 1 year ago
@Dointhupidthings Why are you so against what DZ has too say? I mean what really bothers you about a guy trying to help the planet?
SinFeind 1 year ago
Humanities impact is all around you. Deforestation, polluted oceans, polluted fresh water, which is only 2% of the water on the planet and is detrimental to life, industrialized food systems, inhumane feed lots, accelerating loss of diversity, and the list could go on and on. You have had the wool pulled over your eyes in the name of profits. How ignorant do you have to be to convince yourself that Suzuki is a lying thief? If you had half his education you would only begin to see the light.
toddghall 1 year ago
David stated that in 1990 the leading scientists issued a dire warning, & that within 10 years or so catestrophic events would occur & that 16 years later, he didn't state which catestrophic events occured or not...odd...
amaroq69 1 year ago
@amaroq69
You heard that wrong, he did not say that catastrophic event would occur in 10 years, he the chance to AVOID catastrophic events in the future would be lost in 10 years...meaning that we are currently waiting for an environmental catastrophe.
AmpegV4 1 year ago 3
@AmpegV4 Ok, ain't holdin' my breath though...:D
amaroq69 1 year ago
Ice caps melted before man existed. Temperatures rose before man existed. We have proof what happened in the past, but no proof of what will happen in the future. Just the alarmists....that's all we have. And the alarmists like Suzuki have been living high off the hog and stinking the planet up, and now they want us to change the world AND pay them for this advice...:). In the 70's, all the mentors of the present day thieves were saying there was an impending ice age...DUHHH
DoinThupidThings 1 year ago
These morons who think that educated people are more honest than uneducated people must not have had much of an education themselves.
DoinThupidThings 1 year ago
Suzuki is a liar. An activist with an agenda. No more, no less.
tunderbar04 2 years ago
Nah, you gotta read about his life. He worked so hard and did so much for many noble causes.
willduquebec 2 years ago
@tunderbar04
source of your claims?
pseudonymmmm 2 years ago
Read anything on his bio. After he abandoned science many many years ago, he has done nothing but advocate an extreme position on the environmental issue. Show me what he has done that isn't advocating an extreme position on the environment.
tunderbar04 2 years ago
@tunderbar04
Is there any such thing as an activist *without* an agenda?
Why is he a liar?
Politicimo 1 year ago
A "scientist" advocating an alarmist stance on non-existent manmade global warming is a liar.
tunderbar04 1 year ago
@tunderbar04
Suzuki has a PhD. Do you? And what makes you think anthropogenic global warming is "non-existent"?
Politicimo 1 year ago
Just because he has a PhD that doesn't mean he isn't a lying thief. He's had the wool over people's eyes for years, travelling around the globe and keeping 2 houses and living with a huge carbon footprint and now he wants us all to be not like him? The guy should be thrown in jail with Al Gore. And make them share a toilet and bed, that will reform them hopefully
DoinThupidThings 1 year ago
@DoinThupidThings
Ok, so you're not going to answer my question then. You've resorted to ad-hominem attacks instead of telling me why you doubt anthropogenic global warming. I didn't ask you in jest - I was honestly wondering about your opinion - what it is, and how you came about it.
So I'll ask again: what scientific data has led you to doubt the claims of the scientific community that global warming is anthropogenic in nature?
Politicimo 1 year ago
What proof do you have that global warming exists? We've recently come to know that scientists in England feel the need to cover up data when it doesn't conform to what they are telling us. Also, how do you explain the fact that Greenland was once a lush rainforest? And there was no man back then. How about ice ages? Man didn't cause global cooling. It's all part of natural cycles. Man has nothing to do with temperatures, unless there are thousands packed into a room.
DoinThupidThings 1 year ago
@DoinThupidThings
What proof? The temperatures are getting warmer? Duh? Ever looked at the melting polar ice caps? Or receding glaciers?
How do I explain Greenland once being a lush rainforest? How about climate change, dude? No one is disputing that natural cycles have played their part.
But carbon dioxide absorbs the longwave radiation heading back to space in the form of heat, so as we add more CO2, there's more material absorbing this heat. We're "indirectly" warming the planet.
Politicimo 1 year ago
So tell me then...why this increase of one degree over the past 50 years...are you following?....tell me with indisputable proof how you can be sure that this isn't a natural warming pattern. Just because man is present during this one it doesn't mean that this one is man-caused. Come on Mr. Duh, Mr Insulter. Greenland might become a lush rain forest again. How can we be positive that if man does everything these crooks want us to that we can stop these minute increases in temperature. To you.
DoinThupidThings 1 year ago
See, he was wrong, there isn't any climate change, or we'd have floods everywhere, and hurricanes and typhoons; I haven't seen this on the nightly news, so it just isn't happening, is it?
batourey 2 years ago
@batourey there are floods everywhere, hurricanes and typhoons. You don't see it on the news because you are not looking at the right sources
crass770 2 years ago
I was being ironic - Americans don't get any of the real news about the fires of Australia, the floods in Europe, the droughts in Africa, etc. An American has to watch Russia Today, BBC, even Al Jazeera to find out about what is happening. Thanks to YouTube there is more than CNN.
batourey 2 years ago
He won the alterntive Nobel prize today!! The Right Livelyhood ward 2009 :)
Mr . Suzuki will accept the award at at ceremont at the Swedish governments head quarters 'Riksdagen ' on the 4 Dec. 2009. Well deserved and well done.!
TheSwedechris 2 years ago
Suzuki is merely pasing on whats now widely known as fact .
He is right in being mad at the perspective and the dumb assed short term priorities of the the major news carriers. They are too old school and corportate and should be made aware of it, like he is doing here.
its supposed to be a free society in whcih we live , not one where celebrities and rumors make the headlines . its sad that its taken solong . maybe we have blown it because of that .
TheSwedechris 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Suzuki is a proponent of eugenics. Since he has bad eyes, among other things, why doesn't he rid the world of his own bad genetics???
The man couldn't be more wrong about everything. He knoes it, can't admit it. In way too deep.
Tilbily 2 years ago
Go David Suzuki!
savetheearthgirl 3 years ago
As a media student we're taught that the media/television is a follower not a leader. The dilemma is TV produces what ppl want to watch, so this goes back to the ppl more than the media's responsibility.
hodg7339 3 years ago
Oh yeah !!!!
Mon4ch0 3 years ago
738 views is also terrifying, I hope more poeple see this and that even more people understand it. Your daily lives won't matter when your dead with no environment left to reincarnate into.
Chewy2284 3 years ago
overpopulation should be on top of the list
skillwilly 3 years ago
it's not overpopulation thats the problem, it bad organization, check out over population, all the poeple in the world would fit into Jacksonville Florida. the world isn't overpopulated, it's just very, very poorley organized how we live.
Chewy2284 3 years ago
This is a very stupid , crazy, comparison , check the footprint! And you discover we use more than one earth. Because we are legio and use factor 2000 more than we give back to the earth. It must be equal by reducing our numbers drastic and very fast.
skillwilly 3 years ago
That is a possible solution, if we don't destroy the earth in the process trying to bring our numbers down. If we were to use biological agents to acheive this, theres always a chance it could get out of hand, wipe our species out entirely, and/or wipe out other forms of life on the planet. I don't think destructive action is the solution. According to many models, the earth can sustain possibly 12-14 billion humans, with humans living neutral to the environment. Not living as we are now though.
Chewy2284 3 years ago
show me one model !
skillwilly 3 years ago
Your right, urban sprawl and poor urban development lead to inefficient land use. In terms of the worlds carying capacity, estimates range from 1 to 1000 billion in terms of population. It comes down to this: will population growth ever excede human innovation that allows to obtain and use our resources more efficiently and effectively.
7CATALYST25 3 years ago
I understand your point on human inovation. I beleive however that the innovation has existed for a long, long time, but human social circumstances, also with the priorities and traditions of the ruling elites, have sent us down this horrible path. Whats even scarier is that they may be even doing it on purpose. Unless swift revolution takes hold, I think we're fucked.
Chewy2284 3 years ago
fair enough, although swift revolution might not even be necessary, there is a lot of hope in the European countries. Relative to North America, they are much more efficient, effective, competent in terms of public administration. The most heartening thing about Europe is voter turnout and political literacy, and I believe one begets the other in terms of competent governing. Ignorant population allow for incompetent rule.
7CATALYST25 3 years ago
Wow! I didn't know that! Amazing!
Toji85 3 years ago
put this man on the new world order of sanity and send hollywood on a long vacation.
peace
johnnierah 3 years ago 11