I remember sitting in the living room on a Sunday afternoon and listening to Caruso with my Dad. It was an old wind up record player. I love those the little scratches. My dad would tell me the words in english. He had seen Caruso performed and said there will never be a voice like his. He was very proud of Mario Lanza, [ he was Italian after all] but said he just didn't have the strength and power that Caruso had. I think that he was rightfully prejudous..
@jbruschetti Mario Lanza was a complete joke; a man who sang in opera once in his life in the least liked tenor role and otherwise only recorded on a Hollywood sound stage. The phrase "the American Caruso" was made up by his record company and movie execs for sales. The real "American Caruso," as in an American spinto tenor who had a career closest to Caruso himself, was Richard Tucker.
WoW. I'm glad I can listen to & appreciate my old 78s without agonizing over whether I've got an early "B-plate", or a later pressing! It's about the music people - so quit doggin VinylToVideo over which pressing he/she used for this video! I'm, as always, glad to see people posting these videos & preserving the great artists of the past for future generations to enjoy. I'll take a scratchy 100 y.o. performance over ANY modern version. After 1950, something got lost, the quality just isn't there
Enrico Caruso è stato e continuerà ad esserlo x chi continua ad ascoltarlo ancora uno dei più grandi tenori,sentendo o sole mio,voglio ricordare e rendere omaggio al grande maestro Luciano Pavarotti,Costoro insieme e in epoche diverse fecero lodare con la loro voce il nostro tricolore nel mondo, grazie.
Back in the day, one reviewer likened the grafting of electrically recorded orchestras on to Caruso's records to "...putting Dutch Masters into chromium frames." (Francis Robinson, liner notes to "The Best of Caruso"., Personally, I think this one is pretty successful. Tinroof, you wouldn't want to put a record from the '40s on a wind-up Victrola.
Something about this just doesn't sound right.... it's almost as if some of the wonderful dynamics aren't "cutting through" like they should.... dunno.
The only thing "up" is that this was 'remastered' between 1928 and 1931 with equipment and in ways that I can't even imagine. How the hell would an engineer be able to make an acoustic recording sound this good in those days and why wasn't it done to acoustic recordings of other artists are the questions you should be asking! I really don't know the answer to your question; it could be simply that the stylus I used to transfer the recording from the 78 wasn't wide enough.
I can't stand them 9/10 times either but this is one of those times out of 10 that I can. They weren't able to remove anything at all from the voice in those days as they did in those awful recent digital Caruso remastered CDs, all they could do is add the new orchestra to the recording. I'll play it later with a wider stylus and see if that makes any difference.
I think if played on my Great Grandma's old " Brass " The victrola she had in the sitting room it would sound perfect as it should. for the recording.
In the 1930's, and a little bit after, they actually decided to put NEW orchestra backing into Caruso's recordingds
It's said that they resulting mash-ups sound throughly second hand. I, unfortunately, have one of the LATER remasters, and it sounds ok on a modern turntable, but played on an acoustic machine, the difference is obvious
I thought it was, but wasn't quite sure because the original didn't sound too bad. I also think it's a re-release from the 40s because the label looks to be the same as the ones released in Canada in the 40s. Also, I've never seen the words "RCA Victor Red Seal" as the main label on records produced in Canada this early - They normally say "His Master's Voice/Victor" with "RCA Victor" somewhere else on the bottom.
Beautiful..
TheShantry 4 months ago
Good remastering, but his voice sounds a little quiet. Computers and modern sound equipment would fix those kinds of issues.
31operafan 11 months ago
GENIO!!!
calasazules 11 months ago
EL INOLVIDABLE CARUSO, SOLO CARUSO EL MEJOR..
RECIEN VI UNA RESEÑA DE SU INTERESANTE VIDA.
ESCUCHARLO ME ESTREMECE......
hammapolita 1 year ago
I remember sitting in the living room on a Sunday afternoon and listening to Caruso with my Dad. It was an old wind up record player. I love those the little scratches. My dad would tell me the words in english. He had seen Caruso performed and said there will never be a voice like his. He was very proud of Mario Lanza, [ he was Italian after all] but said he just didn't have the strength and power that Caruso had. I think that he was rightfully prejudous..
jbruschetti 1 year ago 3
@jbruschetti Mario Lanza was a complete joke; a man who sang in opera once in his life in the least liked tenor role and otherwise only recorded on a Hollywood sound stage. The phrase "the American Caruso" was made up by his record company and movie execs for sales. The real "American Caruso," as in an American spinto tenor who had a career closest to Caruso himself, was Richard Tucker.
VinylToVideo 1 year ago
WoW. I'm glad I can listen to & appreciate my old 78s without agonizing over whether I've got an early "B-plate", or a later pressing! It's about the music people - so quit doggin VinylToVideo over which pressing he/she used for this video! I'm, as always, glad to see people posting these videos & preserving the great artists of the past for future generations to enjoy. I'll take a scratchy 100 y.o. performance over ANY modern version. After 1950, something got lost, the quality just isn't there
alternatehistories 1 year ago
It's old, but what a voice,. Very nice...
SuperMrduncan 1 year ago 2
Enrico Caruso è stato e continuerà ad esserlo x chi continua ad ascoltarlo ancora uno dei più grandi tenori,sentendo o sole mio,voglio ricordare e rendere omaggio al grande maestro Luciano Pavarotti,Costoro insieme e in epoche diverse fecero lodare con la loro voce il nostro tricolore nel mondo, grazie.
mariocaruso96 1 year ago
32 of Carusos original acoustic recordings were 're-recorded' in the mid 1930s, with a newly [electrically] recorded orchestra superimposed.
26 of these were issued on Victor 78s: all 32 appeared on HMV pressings.
Further Caruso 're-recordings' have been made in the past decade - some of them [to my ears] quite successful.
saltburner2 1 year ago
Enrico the Best ever...i love his Voice...
eisbearknut 1 year ago
si los angeles cantan como Enrrico que bello debe oirse en el CIELO
churunmerun 1 year ago
Back in the day, one reviewer likened the grafting of electrically recorded orchestras on to Caruso's records to "...putting Dutch Masters into chromium frames." (Francis Robinson, liner notes to "The Best of Caruso"., Personally, I think this one is pretty successful. Tinroof, you wouldn't want to put a record from the '40s on a wind-up Victrola.
luvmyrecords 1 year ago
One should accept and tolerate both, remasterings a n d originals! Why always fight about it instead of showing tolerance of other Caruso-fans?
oldcheery 1 year ago
The oldest Sole Mio ... the best! Caruso the best!
Hunorrrr 1 year ago 4
Something about this just doesn't sound right.... it's almost as if some of the wonderful dynamics aren't "cutting through" like they should.... dunno.
(makes a weird face)
Something's up imo.
Panzombren 2 years ago
The only thing "up" is that this was 'remastered' between 1928 and 1931 with equipment and in ways that I can't even imagine. How the hell would an engineer be able to make an acoustic recording sound this good in those days and why wasn't it done to acoustic recordings of other artists are the questions you should be asking! I really don't know the answer to your question; it could be simply that the stylus I used to transfer the recording from the 78 wasn't wide enough.
VinylToVideo 2 years ago
Well jesus christ... I didn't deserve a negative mark for noting what I observed during my listen....
I completely disagree with the "question you think I should have thought about/asked" because imo.... the ORIGINAL is where the Gold is.
I can't stand remasters 9/10... hell maybe you're right... it could have been the needle you used....?....
Panzombren 2 years ago
I can't stand them 9/10 times either but this is one of those times out of 10 that I can. They weren't able to remove anything at all from the voice in those days as they did in those awful recent digital Caruso remastered CDs, all they could do is add the new orchestra to the recording. I'll play it later with a wider stylus and see if that makes any difference.
VinylToVideo 2 years ago
Sounds good, I'm eager to see if I can hear any difference at all.... maybe it's just my ears.
We all have different ears : )
Panzombren 2 years ago
@VinylToVideo The remastered CDs are much worse!
Actually I prefer the LP sound:)
sirpolopaul 1 year ago
This is a bit-muffled rendering by the Master, of a lovely Neapolitan city-ditty.
Don't argue. Point to better versions.
Or shut up.
Take your aforementioned evocations of jesus christ with you. Interferes with the splendour of old Caruso.
Nowt to do with 9/10. Ref - Grindingly -ignorant-sod - post.! (i.e. yours) Panzobrem
Keep off the plaza, your comments could be those of a buffoon. Or a babboon.
redoler 1 year ago
@Panzombren swearing is completely unnecessary and offensive to some of us...
tsmlink 11 months ago
@tsmlink Well then don't get offended so easily. The fact that you are is reason enough for him to continue doing it.
VinylToVideo 11 months ago
I think if played on my Great Grandma's old " Brass " The victrola she had in the sitting room it would sound perfect as it should. for the recording.
tinroofbusted 2 years ago
@Panzombren
you are actually right
In the 1930's, and a little bit after, they actually decided to put NEW orchestra backing into Caruso's recordingds
It's said that they resulting mash-ups sound throughly second hand. I, unfortunately, have one of the LATER remasters, and it sounds ok on a modern turntable, but played on an acoustic machine, the difference is obvious
RICKROLLBLENDER 1 year ago
Didn't Elvis Presley record this same song with the lyrics changed and the title was called "It's Now Or Never?"
Gvieto 3 years ago
very beautiful!!
biaraffa87 3 years ago 2
And this is also a re-recorded version from 1930.
transformingArt 4 years ago 3
I thought it was, but wasn't quite sure because the original didn't sound too bad. I also think it's a re-release from the 40s because the label looks to be the same as the ones released in Canada in the 40s. Also, I've never seen the words "RCA Victor Red Seal" as the main label on records produced in Canada this early - They normally say "His Master's Voice/Victor" with "RCA Victor" somewhere else on the bottom.
VinylToVideo 4 years ago
These re-edition on red vynil dates from 1947
jozefsterkens 3 years ago
Those must be re-releases when vinyl first came out in the late '40s. I think 1947 was the first year for those Red Seal 45s.
VinylToVideo 3 years ago