Question for the Mormons?

[mrjaggers]

Of course she can remarry. For women, the original sealing must be dissolved or undone. Then she can be sealed to her new spouse. It's really a simple answer.

[streboryesac]

When a spouse dies, he can be sealed again. There are two current apostles who have been sealed to more than one woman because of this situation. A woman however, cannot be re-sealed to a second spouse. Women are only permitted to be sealed to one man. They can marry for time on this earth. but the first sealing is the only one.

[mrjaggers]

@streboryesac This is false. A woman can be sealed to a different person. The first sealing, however, has to be undone or unsealed.

[MendedVeracity]

@mrjaggers Then that makes "sealed for all Eternity" A BOLD LIE, kinda sorta like everything else about mormonism,huh.....hmmmmmm

[MendedVeracity]

@streboryesac And that is because,....Drum roll please .Because spiritual polygamy is doctrinal until of course some LD$ inc. power-crazy profiting prophet decides for the umpteenth time to change the freakin rules,right. I know I am a little late into the conversation but just got out and GEEZ, it feels good to let off some steam.Not a true religion so the rules are a pack of lies also.

[Mute5916]

Women have to be unsealed in a temple in order to be resealed to another husband. Very simple.

[Trillidotia]

Oh my no, a woman can only be sealed to one man. In rare instances sealings can be cancelled, but it's not common, even in divorce. A woman who's been sealed can remarry for time only. Only men can have harems in the celestial kingdom. Women must accept their lot as sister wives in the CK. Yes, this is way sexist - but that's Mormonism for ya.

[moyersings]

...n that 2nd husband will have to find another wife to be sealed to in the after life.

[moyersings]

great question.

ya if ur sealed to a woman n then u die the next day she is screwed. she'll have to find a new husband n hope it's ok w him to be only for this life cuz u'll be waiting for her when she dies n not her 2nd husband, even if they were married longer n she got along better w him. :)

[jonnygotz2343]

so if i die my wife cant be sealed to another nor can a man be sealed to a woman who was married in the temple he can marry her just cant be sealed only to the first spouse can a woman be sealed to

[jonnygotz2343]

a woman cant be sealed again if she was married in the temple so shes sealed to one person

[HomesliceDrummer]

I didn't read any of the other replies, but what happens is this:

If a woman is sealed a to a deceased man, in order to be sealed to another man, the first sealing has to be "undone", however that process goes.

A man could potentially be sealed to infinity wives, but a woman sealed only to one man.

Polygamy, although not practiced publicly, is still an LDS doctrine that remains true within the church.

[moparmonster1965]

Since you can't legally be a polygamist, you can't achieve exaltation and thus, no godhood for you.

Sorry.

[HomesliceDrummer]

moparmonster1965 Clearly you are a fool. You litter all LDS videos full of trash and your comments and replies call for zero respect beause they deserve none.

You think the laws of man will override God in the end? um, no.

Polygamy is STILL practied in the temple by the LDS church, on a spiritual level, and anyone who doesn't know this should.

Oh, and Ford > Mopar.

[moparmonster1965]

Like most, you're simply unable to answer the questions because of the conclusion they'll likely lead you to; that Mormonism is a farce and that almost everything you believe is a lie.

Will the laws of man override those of God? Apparently they did when the church renounced polygamy and allowed blacks into the priesthood. The church has a habit of caving in to social pressure, it seems.

And the "spiritual level" nonsense is not supported by your scripture, is it?

[HomesliceDrummer]

Unable to answer the questions? Hahahahah!!!

This guy proposed a question in his video and I answered it. Plain and simple.

I know you are an anti-mormon and will do and say anything to drive people away from the LDS church. Your motives are sour and you are as transparent as glass.

You need to get a life. You litter nearly every LDS video with trash that is aimed at driving people away. You suck.

[moparmonster1965]

Anti-Mormon as in anti-lies? Yes, I therefore am.

I have a life, thank you, and a calling, which is to be here, right now, doing what I'm doing to the best of my ability.

I'm giving you the information that the church won't because if you leave, you take your tithe with you, and they don't want that. You will, however, have to explain to God the reason you urinated on his gospel by accepting the gospel of a fraud named Smith.

[HomesliceDrummer]

Anti-lies? Bwahahaha, good one.

I am an anti-liar myself, and therefore reply to you.

A calling, no doubt, and directly from Satan.

I don't need the "information" the church "won't give". They sell the very sources of that information in their own bookstores. They aren't hiding anything.

Go makeout with Sanrda Tanner or something.

[moparmonster1965]

Really? Can you find the first account of the Furst Vision for me at Deseret Books, please. Look for the one with the "Jewsih minister" named Joshua.

[HomesliceDrummer]

There are books that speak of the multiple accounts of the first vision and analyze them, at Deseret book. Again, the church doesn't try to hide anything.

Not publicly speaking about something vs trying to keep it away from people are two entirely separate things that you have failed to distinguish.

You are really trying here, aren't you?

Pathetically scrambling to find something to get me on, but have failed miserably. Sad, poor, old man.

Get a life.

[moparmonster1965]

Is that right? Why did even Hugh Nibley admit that that particular account was supressed? The fact of the matter is that the church was forced to admit to it because the cat was already out of the bag. To continue treating it as they had would then most certainly be hiding it.

And then you insult me while pretending to be a Christian?

Who's the hypocrite?

[HomesliceDrummer]

Pretending to be a christian?

Believing and following Jesus is the very definition of a christian and is what I try my best to do.

I'm not one of those judgemental, over-zealous fanatical traditional christians who can't trace any source of authority to even speak of the things of God to others.

Traditional christians are retarded. They believe in only minute parts of the new testament.and ignore everything else that stares them in the face that LDS people fully embrace. Pathetic 4 U.

[moparmonster1965]

What you perceive as believing only parts of the NT is actually of two problems: the first is projection, accusing me of what you're actually doing and second, is the intentional misinterpretation of scripture since it doesn't fit LDS theology.

The Biblical Jesus isn't a created being, isn't a polygamist, and didn't attone for our sins in the Garden of Gethsemane.

[HomesliceDrummer]

Actually, Jesus was created. Jesus was born through the womb of a woman. That is called creation. You fail, my friend.

Jesus is not the Almighty God. Jesus is the Son of the Almighty God. Jesus was created by the Almighty God as the first born.

Get a clue.

I don't recall any LDS canon even implying Jesus was a polygamist. JOD or HOTC doesn't count dingbat. They are not canonized.

[moparmonster1965]

Luckily, my god didn't commit incest with his daughter, Mary, in order to produce a weak savior.

My savior was with God because he is God. The allusion to Jesus is the common thread between the old and new testaments.

Since your church is lead by Jesus, anything is commissions, aithorizes, approves, prints, distributes, and sells has that divine stamp of approval, no matter what is canonized.

And the JOD clearly states that it is scripture...

[HomesliceDrummer]

You've been watching that ridiculous cartoon too much dude.

Nobody ever said God had sex with mary. That is a seriously erroneous misconception of the doctrine of the Divne Sonship of Jesus Christ.

The mechanics of the conception of Jesus have NEVER been identified by any church leader. EVER.

Jesus is God, but he is not the Highest God, as he Himself clearly identifies in the New Testaments several times. "There is one even greate than I"

Read the scriptures more. It helps.

[moparmonster1965]

You sure about that?

"Well, now for benefit of the older ones, how are children begotten? I answer just as Jesus Christ was begotten of his father...Now, my little friends, I will repeat again in words as simple as I can, and you can talk to you parents about it, that God the Eternal Father, is literally the father of Jesus Christ." (Joseph F Smith, Box Elder Stake Conference, Dec 20, 1914)

And it was even stickier when the church taught that Adam was god...

[HomesliceDrummer]

You completely misunderstand what is being said. The point of this comment is to display how literally Jesus is the Son of God just as we are sons and daughters of our parents.

Conception doesn't mean having sex. Conception means that the egg is fertilized.

We have artificial insemination, test tube babies, and other ways to achieve conception other than intercourse/physical relationship. I think God could come up with an even better way.

Again, you fail. Miserably.

[moparmonster1965]

You're talking in circles saying that Jesus is literally the son of God, but not through intercourse, though Joseph F Smith made it clear, using the term "literally," and telling the children to ask their parents about it. He was quite obviously talking about sex, physical intercourse, which then basically equates to incest, your god being the father of Mary's spirit.

This is the unfortunate by-product of believing that god has a body of flesh and bone (though it's not in the BOM).

[HomesliceDrummer]

Saying "literally" means that God's DNA literally is a par of Jesus. That does not mean God had sex with mary. You are an idiot.

Read luke chapter 24, and come back and tell me the ressurected Jesus Christ doesn't have flesh and bones. Since you think God and Jesus Christ are one in the same, it would then mean that God also has flesh and bone. Even not considering that, Jesus's perfected immortal and eternal state would only logically be equal in substance to that of Gods.

Owned again.

[moparmonster1965]

The words of your own prophet are abundantly clear and he went out of his way to make the point.

Just because Jesus had flesh and bones at his resurrection doesn't mean that he was going to keep them for all eternity, does it? And he wasn't exalted in the Mormon sense because he still bore the wounds of his crucifixion, not a perfect, godly body.

It's also funny that you cite the Bible as your evidence, a book that's missing any "plain and precious things."

[HomesliceDrummer]

So, you are assuming that Jesus at some point ditched his ressurected body? What motivates you to make such a horrible assumption? That's completely irrational and stupid. completely unscriptural, whereas my view point is backed completely by scripture.

You are digging the hole deeper and deeper as you go.

Christ bares the wounds in his hands because of the significance of what he has done. Showing he is one in the same before and after death was necessary to testify of his divinity.

[moparmonster1965]

I absolutely never said that, nor do I necessarily believe it.

Since you think he was an exalted being (in the Mormon sense of the word), why did he still have the wounds he suffered upon his resurrection? A perfected being shouldn't likely have those, would he?

And assuming he was "exalted," why was he performing miracles and casting out demons before his Crucifixion? That clearly indicates divinity before his resurrection.

[HomesliceDrummer]

Of course he was divine before the ressurection. DUH!!

The fact that he still has the wounds in his hands testifies to the people that iwas the same man, and I think those wounds in Christ's hands are a badge of honor.

Bull frickin crap dude, the fact that he had a physical body at his ressurection explicity implies and testifies that Immortality is within the bonds of a physical body. You saying otherwise is PURE LIES. Trying to dance around it won't work. I don't let that BS slide.

[moparmonster1965]

In that case, he wouldn't need to be exalted after all, would he?

And if your assertion is correct, please tell me where I can find that God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are "one in purpose in the BOM. I can't find it anywhere...

[HomesliceDrummer]

Completely untrue. Jesus Christ was the first born spirit child of God, and had never been through mortality. He was required to go through the same things we do, just as God did before us, with also the mission to live perfectly and atone for our sins. Before he did this, he was divine, but not of the same power, authority and glory of God the Father. Read John chapter 5:19-20

You can find it in the Bible, so what does it matter to you what the BOM says?

[moparmonster1965]

Why would I take your advice and read a book that's missing many "plain and percious things?" It obviously cannot be relied upon because it needs to be propped up by the BOM.

[HomesliceDrummer]

You know wha, since you DO believe the biblke, I've sadi all I need to.

Yes, t eBook of Mormon clarifies Bible doctrines. It epxplains them better, and goes into mre detail, bu it ever contradicts, contrary to the claims made by bias enemies of the true gospel of Jesus Christ.

Oh, and don't send me videos either. I've seen and heard everythin over and over. I don;t need ye anoher video full of worthless false accusations that have been proven wrong over and over again.

[moparmonster1965]

I believe in the authority of the Bible, but your god doesn't. Even he, through your prophets, said essentially the same thing so your point is moot.

I haven't sent you any videos because they're not my own; I can take no responsibility for the content of anyone's else's messages or videos.

[HomesliceDrummer]

Of course my God doesn't believe in the authority of the Bible. My God IS the authority. Not words on a page that are so commonly misinterpreted and distorted as is evident from the 1000's of different Christian creeds.

[moparmonster1965]

And back to the point I believe I made before: if that's the case, why is it canonized? And why don't you use the JST? We know he finished it, don't we? And if it is so incorrect, why would the church distribute copies of it? Isn't that your churhc, then, repeating a lie that it knows to be a lie?

[theembracedofgod]

god is in your head, its not real. so ya your right your god has authority over you not anything else.

oh by the way, could you show me some words that are misinterpreted and distorted by Christian "creeds"? because your not the one to talk with your book of mormon having well over 3913 corrections since 1830, and having more than 1200 plagiarized verses from the KJV bible. also having no record of evidence of Nephies.

[metaljar02]

dam the god of you church was racist when church started man so that mean if the original mormon religion still exist then I could have more then one wife since hey josep smith started it all but crap I wouldnt be able to assist since Im brown :( not even byu back in the days sad I rather stick to god and jesus and us humans not mormons jewiscatholic etc for your info I used to be a mormon n I know how hipocrite people were just do research first just hope when a 14 yr old sees god u belive him

[HomesliceDrummer]

@metaljar02

learn how to type, spell and put apostrophes. I can't even decipher that message. I'd expect more from a 12 year old.

[metaljar02]

it's all good, if your trying to be funny is not working.. anaways I would use apostrophes but how can I when Im going over the limit, I guessing your smarter then that.. and I know my spelling is not the best but I was typing fast at that time, even though I really dont care.. mormon to grammer well hey If I got to grammer school atleast I will learn something useful huh ;) oh and by the way if you check you grammer when typing to moparmonster1965 you will notice your not the best speller huh

[HomesliceDrummer]

Whatever dude. Your first comment isn't even understandable.

[moparmonster1965]

These, perhaps?

God being married, of us all being spiritual siblings, that he's an exalted being and that we, too, can become gods, anything about the pre-mortal existance, that God has a physical body, that there are three levels of Heaven, that polygamy would be permitted even while it was publicly denounced, that he, God, and the Holy Spirit are separate and distinct, or that he atoned for our sins in the Garden.

[moparmonster1965]

Is this so? Can you point out some of the doctrines in the BOM that we don't find in the Bible?

[HomesliceDrummer]

I cite the Bible because to you, it's infallible. It should be that much more convincing. And since it is infallible in your view, why completely ignore what it says concerning the physical ressurected body of Christ?

Assuming he didn't keep his physical body and at some point ditched it has absolutely no base, and is a COMPLETELY RETARDED position to take.

For someone who makes ridiculous assumptions with no scripture, you claiming something to be abundandtly clear has NO validity.

[moparmonster1965]

I don't recall ever having said that, yet you rant as if I had. You need to reread my posts in order to keep up.

I said that there's no evidence that he was supposed to keep a physical body in eternity. There's no way to say one way or the other.

[HomesliceDrummer]

Face it , you are getting your ass handed to you in a hand basket. Just leave while you still have a pair before I take those too.

[moparmonster1965]

Is that right? Is that the reason you have yet to answer with any abilty the answers I've asked, the points I've made?

If that's your interpretation of being right, your standards are very low, but then again, accepting the BOM as fact, they have to be.

[llegalPlayer]

YoungApologetics LDS Mormon women are not aloud to be sealed to more then one man in the Mormon temple.Unless they get what you call a Temple divorce.

HomesliceDrummer sex to make Jesus

Mormon Apostle McConkie explained,"And Christ was born into the world as a literal Son this Holy Being;he was born in the same personal,real,and literal sense that any mortal son is born to a mortal father. He was begotten,conceived and born in the normal and natural course of events (Mormon Doctrine, p. 742).

[nashaunconwell]

Had I been a Mormon, I would be so concerned that the overwhelming truth of NO EVIDENCE concerning the lands of Lamanites, Jaradites, like Zarahemla, etc. Many Mormons get the warm fuzzy and feel that everything they learn in church must be true regardless of the multiple "first Visions" of Joseph Smith AND some MORMONS will defend these problems, one can simply understand Mormonism by the lyrics in the Hymn book " PRAISE TO THE MAN" this is both disturbing and discusting!

[theembracedofgod]

I have to admit; it is disgusting.

mormonism has nothing to do with Jesus Christ- its all about the self- humanism, which doesn't help in the process of atheists after leaving the church.

[nashaunconwell]

Jack Nimble, let me be clear, I DO NOT TOLERATE MORMONISM, I HOPE IT COMES CRASHING DOWN IN MY LIFE TIME. You can visit my youtube page any time , NOTHING TO HIDE. People are becoming aware of the fraud Joseph Smith through current leaders ie Monson. Face it your part of a FRATERNITY, Joseph taught garbage and copied and altered the scriptures. Mormons RELIGION ids NOT Christ but DEFENDING a fraud, the Mormon apologetics are running dry, get out of this fraternity.

[theembracedofgod]

well, if the book of breathings doesn't through off mormons i don't know what will haha.

[technicainsidia]

the x chromsome is passed from the mother and likely the y from the father, making it traceable as to it's origins. Do not mistake my intentions, I am in this for the sake of Christ and that he be glorified. Man is saved by one name under heaven and that is Jesus Christ, to which is not the same Jesus as Gordon B. Henkley believes ( his own words). By faith we are saved not by works lest any man should boast, Eph 2.

[JackNimble61]

I agree that works alone do not save us just as all LDS believe. But we also believe we WILL be judged upon our works as it says in Revelation 20:12.

[nashaunconwell]

"Looking at your subscriptions and reading your profile, one MUST question your motives. " - JackNimble -61 Hey Jack why not answer his question, I love it when Mormons stumble over the stupid ignorant complexities of the non prophet Joseph Smith. Even if this guy were to ask Monson he probably would get a differing answer in the future as past prophets can "have a revelation" when public opinion isnt popular

[JackNimble61]

nashaunconwell,

Same thing goes for you as it does for tech... Thanks.

[technicainsidia]

And the icing on the cake, DNA testing with tribes across north and south america puts them in north east ASIA. The inhabitants came from asia. We can't even analyze the books of mormon because none of the facts line up let alone happened.

[JackNimble61]

technicainsidia,

If you are going to ask me a question, please click on the "reply" link next to MY post, that way I get notified that someone has replied to my post. Otherwise, I get no notification and don't know you ask me a question. Thanks.

[technicainsidia]

So I clicked a reply, did you check the history out? Has BYU or BYO whatever the name is found anything yet? they should if 230,000 were killed you'd think.

[JackNimble61]

Do you actually think this disproves the Book of Mormon?

[JackNimble61]

The DNA analysis that has come out thus far, whether mDNA or Y-Chrom DNA cannot disprove it either. So I guess you're back to square one.

[technicainsidia]

And that my friend is where you are wrong. I'm not sure where you got that from but it is not the consensus among secular molecular biologists. Dr. David Glenn Smith, Dr Dennis O'Rourke just to name a few. Both saying they are ancestral to north east asia. This disproves the book of mormon the same way, a complete lack of historical evidence would disprove the bible. What the book or mormon said happened , didn't, and who was supposedly there, weren't.

[JackNimble61]

And we are not saying all of them were of semitic lineage and looking for an infusion of less than a dozen people into a population that already numbered in the millions is like looking for a needle in a haystack especially when the record shows that one side was exterminated. If David Smith and Dennis O'Rourke believe they have proven the Book of Mormon wrong, then they are sadly mistaken just like the scientists of old were wrong that their only four elements, earth, wind, fire, and water.

[technicainsidia]

so nimble, who's would she be? of the countless other topics to be brought up with mormonism I would love to bring up your archeology. What evidence is there that the lamenites and the nephites had a war where 230,000 nephites died let alone any of which even existed. They used steel, but only stone tools are found, they spoke reformed egyptian when nobody knows what that is, the erected temples that apparently don't bare the names of any of these tribes mentioned in the book of mormon.

[JackNimble61]

I believe your stated intention in the beginning of this video is a deception or half-truth. At least that is how it appears to me. Yes, you may have had a sincere question but I do not believe your motives. You say it's not to "trip us up" but that is generally the whole premise of practically all your videos concerning the Mormon faith. It's subtle but evident. Looking at your subscriptionsand reading your profile, one MUST question your motives.

[YoungApologetics]

look at my subscriptions look at my videos. I have a completly open channel. I am here to dialect not to bash! Ur basing ur asumptions on a premise u want to see not a primise that is evident..

[JackNimble61]

YA,

The reason I doubt your intentions is that after viewing your vids and reading your comments, it appears that you are in this merely to argue. If you want to learn about these things and other things that might affect whether you accept these teachings, it would be best to talk with the missionaries in your area or with local church leaders such as a bishop or elders quorum president. No disrespect intended, but your actions speak louder.

[YoungApologetics]

Jack,

I have attended your church and I spoke with the missionaries twice a week for almost 8 months! I continue to talk with members of the church to this day. Ur acusations continue to fall short of honest understanding. Please sir, I base what I know on evidence. Ur basing yours on what?? speculation??

[JackNimble61]

And what answer did you get from them? Surely they answered your question sometimes within the past 8 months. Are you looking for a different answer?

[GOLLYJONNY]

@JackNimble61 yea, your telling him to stop thinking and drink the kool aid. I will pray for you! and guess what; im not gonna pray hard because Jesus is listening no matter how hard i pray. I cannot help you only grace thru Christ can help you! not after works but before. No matter how hard i pray, My god just wants me to pray and he will listen. now repentance. now that is something i do hard!

[JackNimble61]

@GOLLYJONNY I wasn't telling him to stop thinking. I said he was in this to argue and it appears that by his last comment to me, that is precisely what he was doing. If he is talking to the missionaries twice a week for 8 months, it sounds more like he's in it for a debate, not truth. Even his YT nickname reflects that he's in it for the debate. It's either that, or he's just not ready spiritually and looking for any excuse.

[MendedVeracity]

@JackNimble61 NOPE,NOPE,NOPE, that is not where anyone can find TRUTH. They are just never gonna get paid salesmen for this cult, er I mean nonChristian church.

[MendedVeracity]

@JackNimble61 This question deserves an answer. When I asked it , all I got was a lot of pregnant pauses and vague nonsensical non answers. I was a sincere (just baptized) mormon and I had to bring up the question in the first place cause that's one of those questions one that knows better isn't supposed to ask.

[aliunde]

Just a question for YoungApologetics: So have you come to a conclusion as to the understanding you were seeking? If so, would you mind responding with what you now believe to be the case? Or do you need more clarification?

[YoungApologetics]

Of course. Given the many many responses given by the LDS members and my study of their doctrine I have concluded that their is no verifiable answer, it is not defined, although I know the LDS would disagree..

[Origin305]

A woman can be married again but not sealed again. I hope you understand the difference with the 2. End of the conversation.

[marcopolo8765]

Question for you my young friend? Why would someone want to be sealed to more than one spouse for all time and etunity. Doesn't that seem a little odd to you that someone would want more than one partner for life let alone eturnity? Are you into polygamy or do you just like the idea of having more than one wife. Strange question Im not sure why you ask it.

[YoungApologetics]

Well to answer your first question I would say: ask the mormons, there the ones who seem to think eternal polygamy is a celestial attribute.

I witness to mormons and I study their faith, this was something that I was confused about.. You should check out my channel. I think it will help you to understand my motives..

[marcopolo8765]

I am a mormon. I and I do not think that eternal polygamy is a celestial attribute. . Often times things that are misunderstood get talked about with great exaggeration. I suppose the truth is just to boring for most people. But this is america. You are free to believe anything you would like to. I think with 14 million memebers opinions would very about the celestial kingdom. Fact is were not in the Celestial kingdom, so does it matter that much to you what happens there. And so whatyournotLDS

[YoungApologetics]

Your mormon and you dont believe in eternal polygamy? have you read sec 132 of your D&C?

[marcopolo8765]

Of course it is MY D&C. And I don't think you take much stock in it, Am i correct? So what do you care what another religion has in their scriptures if you don't believe in that religion. You said in your video that you are approaching this question with complete ignorance. But you can site the exact section where it speaks about what you are asking. Did i miss something here? I think the best question of all here is Why do you care what is in our books. If you don't follow their teachings?

[YoungApologetics]

so you lied, you do believe in eternal polygamy? As for your question, why do I care? have you read my channel name? as for being able to site the exact section does not mean I should be able to understand the Mormon perspective! Your logic is amusing my friend.

[marcopolo8765]

label me what you will. But lying is not in our teachings so I always do my best not to. As for my question. I think you avioded it all together again and I am not asking you to think about it for my benefit. There may be a huge lesson you could possilby learn here when you are ready. As for the Latter day saint perspective. Easy.... do and act as a saint would. Thats really all there is to know. I know its not as juicy as eturnal sex with multiple partners. But again sometimes the truthsucks.

[Kaileo1]

hey bud, it's spelled "cite", not "site". given that you work with scriptures a lot you should know how it's spelled.... cheers!

[GwLDS]

i just rembered somthing

LDS doctrine come from mosaic law witch forbids polyandry. but a woman can remarry another man after her husbands death preferable from her dead husbands family. but they are not sealed as this turns it into polyandry which is forbidden by mosaic law

[mclaw2000]

Interesting. You are pretty intelligent.

[GwLDS]

i have done quite a bit of bible study in school and i also did some college cores in religious studies as well

[GwLDS]

women can only be sealed to one man in the eternities, but she can remarry this is true.

gen 4:19-23

also look at Deuteronomy 25:5-9

[stanademas]

Women are sealed only to one spouse.

If a woman's husband dies she can get married again, but it is for life, not eternity.

She could even get married in the temple again, but it would not be a sealing.

[saxaphonedude]

no a women can be re-sealed, but she wont be sealed to her first husband, most dont do that though

[Shulamitefire]

Mormonism rather than being Christocentric is church-egocentric. It is a twistology of theology, sedition of addition, and infusion of confusion, very radically unlike the purity, simplicity and power of devotion to Christ lived and ministered by the church of the first century.

[Kolohe86786876786786]

Who does she sepnd eternity with? That is some thing that her and her 2 husbands will have to work out amongst themselves and the Lord. Remember, vicarious temple ordinances do not eliminate the free will of the benefited parties. My GUESS is, that the woman will spend eternity with the husband she loves the most, assuming both have "merited" exaltation.

[Kolohe86786876786786]

Good questian : O)

1) A woman may only be sealed to 1 man, while she lives in mortality. A woman cannot go to the temple and be sealed to 2 men. 2)Since the presidency of David O. McKay, once all the parties are deceased(the wife and both husbands), her descendants can do the vicarious temple work and seal her to her 2nd husband. Now to the original questian....

[jb2willis]

Could you imagine a Christian in the New Testament saying that they want to be part of the Church but not believe in Peter? "Um, yes, Peter, I want to be baptized because I believe in Jesus, and I want you to do it, but I don't think you're an apostle. What you say doesn't really matter. I just believe in the words of Jesus." If you believe in Jesus, you will believe His prophets. If you reject His prophets you are rejecting Him.

[jb2willis]

My mom and dad were sealed and then adopted me. They divorced. I remained sealed to them and they remained sealed to each other until my mom remarried again. Then their sealing was broken. She was then sealed to my step-dad. My dad was able to be sealed to both my mom and my step-mom at the same time. Then my dad died. My step-mom has since married again and not been able to be sealed to the new husband because her sealing is still in effect with my dad. Eternal marriage is different than civil.

[grnmessiah]

Women can only be eternally sealed to one man.

"Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we declare that we believe that one man should have one wife, and one woman but one husband, except in the case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again."--That was in D&C 101 until 1866.

[uSoBayArea]

....The seal is broken with the deceased husband. Only men are sealed to more than one women...thus the practice of polygamy in the after life.  It is all done in the temple.

[jb2willis]

The sealing is not broken with the deceased husband, that is the point of being sealed. It goes beyond death.

[YoungApologetics]

Sooo if she is resealed to a new husband in the temple, who does she spend eternity with? The first or the second husband??

[jb2willis]

She cannot be sealed to two or more men at the same time. She could get remarried but not sealed to the new husband. After remarrying, she is still sealed to the first husband, not to the second. After being married to the second for some time and demonstrating a solid relationship, it is possible to petition the Church to break the first sealing and then be sealed to the second. Petitioning is rare, and even rarer to receive permission for a sealing cancelation.

[YoungApologetics]

Good Answer.

[uSoBayArea]

..the second...

[uSoBayArea]

...your wrong. It is broken with the deceased husband. I asked my friends dad who is the walnut creek stake president in California.

[jb2willis]

The sealing does have to be broken with the deceased husband in order for a woman to be sealed again. You made it sound like the sealing is canceled with the first husband just by virtue of him dying. The process is quite complex. What I meant is that the sealing is still binding until the request is made to Church authorities and they grant that request, often taking years if ever granted.

[omiolo]

FAIL on the EVERLASTING COVENANT!

see this video

v=Y6u98FDzMDg

[uSoBayArea]

...on that video he says that who believes in him "Jesus Christ" shall have everlasting life. So if I believe in Jesus Christ and not Smith, why can't I be a member?