GÖBEKLI TEPE RECONSTRUCTED

[THEMASTEROFYOU2000]

Nohah's staging site, pillars to support the giant zoo he had aquired and hosuing for th animals, plus the support beams for the shit contruction, as eaily seen if one steps nack and studies just for a moment, yet modern science would not allow such an idea

[WolfeBear]

where are the graveyard(s)? noting metal? no gold or silver images or coins? nothing but stone? This could have been a place for giants to live-rule. Can it be something linked to the Mahabharata ?

[ELKOKE59]

Leaving aside what seems to have become a pointless creationist/evolutionist debate (I wonder why?), I would say that the T-shaped pillars are too big, too heavy just to support a simple hatched roof - it does not make much sense. Besides, such a roof would be too fragile to support the big monkeys, good enough for just a few bananas, and lots of bacterial flagellums.

[ColorfulVideoz]

You have no evidence do you AjPuj?

[Dionysos37]

A kind of kiva or 'house of the ancestors and spirits'?

[Aprilshowersss]

it looks like it was built in second life.

[4569badboy]

If they are intelligent enough to build these stone supports, then they are intelligent enough know that they can carry 100's of tons of weight. Try putting a lid on it. Like a Vimana. Then keep your food gathers in the bottom with the food. They can even cook there if your lid is made of metal and 15 feet high.

Nice place to park your intergalactic motorhome while you build your real house.

Just a thought.

[wizardoflawz]

the problem is that the pillars dont make any sense as supports for some simple roof. they are much too strong, bulky and hard to build

[7to777]

Every thing we know is WRONG

[saintron60]

Lets play doom. Its a great wad file. Two thumbs op.

[Graywolf116]

nice crib bro

[L00kng]

Where did you find the floorplans to build this with? I can't find them anywhere. From the visuals that I have seen so far of the main Temple, there actually ARE NO DOORS in the central enclosure and it is surrounded by 3 corridors what go no where. But I can't find any conclusive pictures.

[bixntram]

More high tech crap.

[1ekzit0n]

I don't know why it reminds me Fallout 2.

[Delafer74]

Animation is like playing "Might and Magic VI. Mandate of Heaven"

[73mandala]

The only problem here is the pillars in this reconstruction are not angled, the pillars are sloping downwards in reality.

[mrfoltz]

I can't believe you people are arguing over something that is thousands of years old and can never be proven as conclusive.... how the fuck do you guys know how it looked??/ Were you there??? Just enjoy the dam video... And WOW! you believe everything Wikipedia and scientists say or write??? WTF? Happy birthday as of yesterday!!!! BTW it's a great video!!!

[farang]

Good recreation based on the existing remains. Probably very close to original in form, thanks! Love these recreations: done any Egyptian or Hittite or any of those type remains?

[YanaRish]

very interesting Thanks!!

[UBtheNEWS]

The most mysterious aspects of Gobekli Tepe--like why the stones get bigger and better as they get older--were explained in The Urantia Book in 1955, about 40 years before they even discovered this incredibly amazing archaeological site. At UBtheNEWS (.) com there is a report that correlates this discovery with what The Urantia Book says about this period in human history.

[ssgoktas]

göbekli tebe is a pre-pottery neolithic site

[punkbloater]

All though a nice attempt this is not correct.

If you read what they have discovered on the site you would see this too.

No roof and the small stones put everywhere into the whole site (also in the middle) was put there to hide the place,

cover it up, for a reason we don't yet know.

[5tonyvvvv]

we are nothing like apes or monkeys nor did we evolve from ape like animals..

[AjPuj]

@5tonyvvvv So what you're saying is that 98% of all scientists in the world are wrong? Yeah... right. Besides, what does that have to do with this attempted reconstruction???????

[5tonyvvvv]

@AjPuj 98 percent of your community,,there is creation science,,its called intellegent desgin

[Safetysealed]

@5tonyvvvv Creation science is NOT a science in any way shape or form, it's a political movement created by american morons who believe in stupid ancient stories and try to twist data and distort proven theories to support their ridiculous and outlandish beliefs.

If you believe anything that comes from the idiots in the biblical creationism movement then I truly pity you.

[5tonyvvvv]

@Safetysealed no thats Evolutiln..morons...good too see u know that evolution is all morons

[Safetysealed]

@5tonyvvvv Seriously?? That's the best reply you can come up with? Rather than attempt to refute my argument with facts, you misspell words, use incorrect grammatical structure and then have the audacity to accuse me of being a moron.

How old are you? You barely have the language skills of even a stupid 10 year old. After seeing how badly you write, it's no surprise to me that you lack the brain power to understand even the most basic scientific concepts behind the theory of evolution.

[Hoyacap88]

@Safetysealed sorry but I disagree. Creationism doesn't necessarily have to be a specific God. It is just a belief that we are created by a superior intelligent. You don't need to pity anyone because if you do some research you will find out that majority of the world's elite scientist support the idea of creationism

[farang]

@Hoyacap88 "You don't need to pity anyone because if you do some research you will find out that majority of the world's elite scientist support the idea of creationism " as if, bozo: define "Elite." Some scientist graduated from Oral Roberts archaeology department with a Major in man/dinosaur relations 6000 years ago? Will you please keep your paleolithic beliefs to yourselves, and try focusing on the science, just for once? You creep me out, and should not be on a science video comment board.

[Hoyacap88]

@farang I"m majoring in science here in southern California and who the hell are you to talk down on me. I could care less about your atheistic viewpoints because I can prove to you that science and religion are compatible.

bible- God created man from dirt- science confirms that our body atoms and molecules are found it dirt

bible -there was a beginning to the universe- Einstein proved that time had a beginning

Genesis 2:1 rephrases the first law of thermodynamics

You need more examples

[5tonyvvvv]

@AjPuj right and we came from a rock.4.6 billion years ago as bacteria..yeah right,,thats bullshit....life from non living materials

[Safetysealed]

@5tonyvvvv Who said that we came from bacteria 4.6 billion years ago? You're a moron. You clearly don't even know the arguments that you're against.

[AjPuj]

@Safetysealed U dumbass- read a science book, will ye.

[nb0616]

@5tonyvvvv Bacteria is a living organism, viruses are non-living.

[PatriotsRepublic]

@AjPuj First, while I don't subscribe to the creation theory, I am going to side with real scientists who don't claim we evolved from apes, but instead theorize that it is due to the formation of organic materials and the simplicity of the DNA molecule that we have similarities to all other life on this planet. We share nearly 50% similar DNA with a banana, yet no one is theorizing that we evolved from bananas or that bananas and humans have a common ancestor.

[robin22391]

@PatriotsRepublic

banana trees share a common ancestor with humans YES. the reason the same genes are found is because those genes deal with the same things needed in both eg cell division dna replication etc, only a small number of genes is needed to make a big difference.

[PatriotsRepublic]

@robin22391 You can posit that hypothesis, but without real evidence, you're just guessing. The only way to prove that we have common ancestry with a banana is to find extraterrestrial life, and show that it does not have any DNA in common with Earth life. In order to prove that every living thing on this planet has common ancestry with every other living thing on this planet, we'll have to show that anything not from this planet shares nothing in common. Don't make claims you can't back up.

[robin22391]

@PatriotsRepublic

we are related to bananas this can be seen in both genetics and cell struture of eukaryotes. Go to university and study genetics and molecular biology and you will have your answers, we scientists waste too much time answering your questions when you will never change your point of view. you use schoolboy reasoning and by your style of reasoning nothing can be known not even if we exist, that is why we invented the scientific method....descartes....

.p.s you are a moron.

[TheJimmax]

@robin22391 I particularly enjoyed the scientific post script.;)

[robin22391]

@TheJimmax

hahaha, i just cant resist it.



[luizfernandomolina]

@AjPuj Where did you take the 98%???? How cientific is that?

[farang]

@5tonyvvvv I did, I have no clue what species you are: "Homo Sapien Sapien...or???? Gerbil?

[5tonyvvvv]

@farang "This engineered RNA" would break down do to the unstable conditions of it..similar to rats leaving a sinking ship..This artificial RNA..has ZERO chance of further evolving into a living cell.

Activated subunits are used along with templates taken from living sources..its not a geochemical relevant reaction.Intelligence created life not time and and chance..

[farang]

@5tonyvvvv What "engineered RNA" , what "artificial RNA" are you referring too??? I posted nothing about any such subject: please take your gibberish and your paleolithic storm god myths back to the hole you crawled out of...and intelligent is spelled with an "i","genius. Oh, forgot: we're "nothing like apes" eh? So, please enlighten us all with YOUR scientific analysis of the percentage of DNA match between primates. I'll wait......."crickets chirping" ..did I hear 95%+..We ARE 5% Neandertals.

[5tonyvvvv]

@farang So only atheists can be scientists..ok..man..LOL..

[5tonyvvvv]

@farang Do you know how unstable proteins and RNA are??..they break down under amazing conditions in the perfect solutions under the supervision of scientists protecting it,at just the right temperatures....so you really think a protein could survive on a poisonous toxic primordial earth.LOL..and evolve ..LOL

[farang]

@5tonyvvvv But they'll exist if your paleolithic storm god placed them there? LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

You seem unaware that Neandertal/Cro-Magnon mix remains have been found. That Europeans have 5% Neandertal DNA to this day, that Max Plankt Institute has isolated FIVE types of MODERN humans, and that Africans lack the Neandertal DNA....which means your paleolithic storm god from Africa ain't MINE. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL No "Israel" archaeological remains in Israel prior to 1000 BC, by the way....

[5tonyvvvv]

@farang Neandertal/Cro-Magnon bullshit they are not related man..just like piltdown man and nebraska man and java man..all said the be ancestors of man..all lies..DNA proves common designer..you have been indoctrinated!!

[TheScienceFoundation]

@5tonyvvvv You still keep ignoring proto-cell vesicles and protein folding, this still isn't an argument.

[5tonyvvvv]

@farang Abiogenesis and evolution are very much connected...Tell an architect to build a skyscraper using no foundation, no base.just have the building float in thin air..let me me know what they will tell you..and how and when this great feat of engineering can be done..you need life to start in order for it to evolve....its nothing more than stubborn logic by evolutionists.

[5tonyvvvv]

@farang Learn Homochirality!!!!!..Stubborn atheist!!!

The synthesis of equal mixtures of racemates

in a solution, there is NO way to get the stereospecific,you cant separate them.

synthesis of molecules without using already EXISTING enzymes Thus, the products of theoretical random

reactions tend to be mixtures of isomers (pairs of chiral compounds)50/50 solution!!!!

[ZaGaZigZag]

@5tonyvvvv Okay, prove it,( in Anthropological terms).

[waisehell]

@5tonyvvvv that theory is that for some time...darwin sucks...sorry! i belieeve the theory of redevelopment...what does it say? it says that we had before the great flood an astonishing civilization wiped out or who left the planet...and this where all the theories intersescts and the fantastical archaeological proofs

[Kavalino]

@5tonyvvvv You're wrong, because, well... I've seen your parents. Walking proof of evolution- they are! Ii's indisputable!!! :-)

[psybmw]

@5tonyvvvv do you know what a mirror is?look in it and you will see a monkey :-)

[5tonyvvvv]

@psybmw Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!

A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!

Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!

[psybmw]

@5tonyvvvv no really when i look in the mirror i see a monkey :--))))))))

[inkey2]

@5tonyvvvv we have a 98% DNA similarity to apes...so it's crazy to say we are nothing like apes

[5tonyvvvv]

@inkey2 Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!

A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!

Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!

[inkey2]

@5tonyvvvv so clerify for me....you are saying it is not possible from a pure scientific point of view or do you say this with a fundimentalist christian, scientific slant

[5tonyvvvv]

@inkey2 All the so called ape men are lies! A. E wilder smith, the man has 3 PhD's and believes in Creation!!

[sayfadeen6]

it is ALL kurdish its so easy to see because

Like the arabs and tribes of arabs assyrians wil deny its kurdish

turks forbidd the kurdish language

KURDS BUILD THIS LIKE THEY INVENTED THE FIRST RELLIGION IN THE MIDDLE EAST

ZOROASTRANISM AND YEZIDI

kurds wil fight because we are fighters

[zippo807]

@sayfadeen6 Öf y.Ööööööf.Fnalık geldi lan.

[hammerheadhotel]

@sayfadeen6 I believe it is a European site.

[YTzinkk]

@hammerheadhotel Sanliurfa, S.E. Turkey

[zrah1092]

aliens built it!

[pjubagoni]

in this way the carves of animals would not be seen

[fenotipobombay]

you're wrong man... if you put the pillars in the wall like that, than all the reliefs and the drawings on their surface are a nonsense! this is your personal idea about the construption but it sounds too much simplified and totally wrong to me.

[AjPuj]

Sorry man, U FAIL! As far as I know, the outer Pillars (if those are the ones ur refering to) were constructed BEFORE the guys who built the rest decided to rais a wall between them- so yeah, ditto. The reliefs on those Pillars would have been covered!

[redwine65]

when I look at that fire pit it reminds me of the one about 100 foot in front of the senate house in the roman forum

[Alastair]

In the description you said it was a paleolithic site, but it's actually meso/neolithic.

[AjPuj]

Ooops- my bad. But it's now corrected.

[butlerson]

No, this site is at the end of the upper paleolithic which was c40,000-c10,000BC or 12,000BP (before the present). Gobekli Tepe is dated to at least 12,000BP and may be as old as 13,000BP - thence, it is upper paleolithic. I checked the dictionary and Wikipedia, both agreed.

[Alastair]

Besides the fact that wikipedia isn't a reliable resource, your facts are straight. The oldest parts of the site may date towards the latest of the late paleolithic or early mesolithic.

[mitchyd2425]

@butlerson....all the intelligent words for your conclusion to say you checked with wikipedia?

[ooglebydoogleby]

nice but there is no evidence of fire in the fire pits.

[AjPuj]

Yes but it's not unlikely. The reliefs on the pillars might have serveda similar purpose as the murals in Altamira in which they tell story that was made more compelling with fire. That's why fire pits.

[ooglebydoogleby]

I understand but fire has recognisable effects on stone which would be obvious they might not have been used however or posibly fire could have been kindled in some sort of container or animal fat floating wick or some such other method. certainly the snake image would not be out of place with fire.

[ozturkceyhan]

Its good job...Thanks.