its simple, the camera is closer to the start point than the end point. Thats why the jumper seems to shrink, cos he lands further away from the camera. Erm, i hope u guys get what i mean
2d comment. Now I know there is something wrong. The jumper is 20% smaller at landing compared to takeoff. And compare the height of the structure behind at takeoff and then at landing.
oh man awesome!
i tried your technique and i improved from 18x cm to 22x cm :D
too good to be true!
HornyMofo 1 year ago
283cm! very good jump!
ihatepap75 2 years ago
Im 28 this yr. 27 at the time of the jump
captnj 4 years ago
how old is this guy
highjumper180 4 years ago
can you dunk???
tgan3 5 years ago
its simple, the camera is closer to the start point than the end point. Thats why the jumper seems to shrink, cos he lands further away from the camera. Erm, i hope u guys get what i mean
linbeilinbei16 5 years ago
True. But if the scene is downhill going directly away from the camera no one could tell---and it would aid the jump, right?
Rushtown 5 years ago
2d comment. Now I know there is something wrong. The jumper is 20% smaller at landing compared to takeoff. And compare the height of the structure behind at takeoff and then at landing.
Rushtown 5 years ago
There's something wrong with this video. The jumper looks like he is going to the left and maybe downhill.
Also his technique is bad for a 10 ft standing broad jumper--too high a jump.
Rushtown 5 years ago
wow.. that's a long jump. do you have any tips on how i should train to achive the same?
azulrojoanaranjado 5 years ago