@milkibay And we in Israel destroyed your stupid Hezbollah asses! With Israeli weapon. Hassan Nasrallah still hiding in his bunker for 4 years. Тупая Хизбала.
Смешно читать комментарии американцев. Как можно жить с таким ограниченным мышлением? Ни малейшего понятия об истории и современной политической обстановке - только штампы и стереотипы. Прочитанное заставило меня поверить в анекдоты об американской тупости. В ваших словах отсутствует элементарная логика.
Israel Jerusalim USA, just can suck cook to our big brother Russia, When the times up pick up your gun. Big suport and hello to our brothers from Serbia
marlo,,,russia is the best usa and europe are lots of stats and they have to make the nato to have a minimal chance against russia, russia is alone against the others, and russia good destroy the half of the usa because of the tsar bomb,biggest atomic bomb in the world.
The Tsar bomb was a propaganda stunt, a smaller bomb suspended in a massive tank of deuterium slush to magnify the blast. For years the USSR lied and claimed it was a 100 megaton blast, only admitting it was 48 megatpons at the end of the cold war. It was not, and was never meant to be, deployable as a weapon.
@CuiusRegio Nemoj da te samo Rus naguzi. I ne nagazi. That means Lets just see when Russian take stape on u. Or When Russia take your ass from behind u just gonna to say, jaikx jaixs. Big hello to brothers from Serbia
the only countrey that defeded russia was the afghan mujahidin not becouse of weapons tec but by fighting moral just like america was defeded in vietnam never undermin the human capacity of fighting spirit in other words if you just relay on high tech weapons in a war and your oponent are determent you will defentley loose thats what i belive
ONLY country that ever defeated Russia was Afghanistan? Really?
Whay about Poland defeating Russia in 1921, or Germany defeating Russia in 1917, or japan defeating Rusia in 1905, or France and the UK defeating Russia in 1853? Shall I continue?
nrouslan, please stop spamming the boards with your illiterate childish scribblings. Nobody can read your misspelled drivel, not that it matters because you never have anything relevant or topical to say at all, just badly scrawled adolescent one-liners: which is as much as your retarded 11-year old mind can manage. Please stop embarassing yourself and your country by speaking.
the new sperpower of the world this comminig years wil be Israel and the oppresion of mankind will beging it will be Jeruselem the headqurters of the new world order At its Washington right now you people jst wauit and see And Russia will be crushed by the anglo american Israeli Alliance.
в смысле--америка должна 55 триллиона--Да-это правда-сверхдержава!---и 651 биллион в милитари--!--Говори-Я -баобаб-я-баобаб-\10000 раз\--и станешь баобабом.--лет через 10.
Люди - главное оружие. А здесь, я думаю, пока паритет. "Пока" - потому что, судя по всему, Америка прилагает больше усилий к уничтожению своего человеческого потенциала, чем кто либо другой.
@gazakind thats not a reason to bomb the US there are millions of inocent people here and if the US troops are not welcome u cant do anything about it,hating america is getting old man,they are US troops in a lot of countries because that is a strategy the world hates the US because they are envious,nothing more nothing less,german soldiers r in afganistan too so i think they r terrorists too
why does those innocent people dont do anyhting against the iraq and afghan conflict? there are innocent people too which die because of american force
is someone who dont do anyhting against a injustice realy innocent in your eyes?
in my eyes, the person who hurts someone and another who just stay there and watch this are both nocent
german troops are in afghan because they are in nato and were "forced" to join the conflict
@gazakind it doesnt matter why they are there,they are killing talibans too as well as royal marines (from UK) are there killing talibans too,french troops are there too so if the US troops are terrorists then all these countries's troops are terrorists too,please u r not making any sense it is obvious that u hate the US for no reason,americans havent done anything to u,even if on american did something to u it doesnt mean they are all the same
@gazakind lol stop making excuses man german troops are doing the same shit,who's the dumb soldier that wants to kill a inocent person ?please..............
@gazakind my nation ?im not american,however i lived here and remember that there are a lot of foreigners living here,the US should not be bombed,people who think america should be bombed are inhuman assholes and racists,if the US wanted to kill inocent people they could have just nuked the entire country or city by city and u know what ?they can,but they wont do it,it doesnt matter whats the reason germans are there it dosent change the fact that they are killing talibans too
@gazakind just like an american is born in china and he will always an american,u r not making any sense stop trying to cover germans they were by far the biggest terrorist the world has ever had,USA is been just a victim of terrorism,why the world hates the US ?only one answer,ENVY that is all
@gazakind i didnt forbid germans do this or do that cuz im not american i just live here,remember that soldier only follow orders,do u think US troops are fighting for terror ? thats a big NO,they are trying to survive and go home and as u can see most of them very young,there's no reason to bomb the US that is a very inhuman thing to do
@gazakind they r fighting for money ?now i know that u have no fucking brain u r the dumbest person on earth i rest my case everyone who hates the US is either envious and jealous or stupid i wont reply u anymore good bye keep hating america that only make her stronger germans were real terrorist
@yandykun ?! retard.. what do they else fight for`? for thair fuckin money and the fact that you dont want to see that makes me think that you have no fuckin brain NOBODY forces them to go to the army.. "They fight to survive" WTF DONT FUCKIN GO TO THE ARMY AND YOU DONT HAVE TO SURVIVE ANYTHING is that your stupid american way? btw i allready told you 4 times that i am not german i study in germany i dont care about them
Actually, about 74% of German soldiers died in the East, though only about 15% of the Luftwaffe and none of the Kriegsmarine. The US joined the war in exactly the same year as the USSR, the difference being the USSR had spent the previous two year helping out their allies the Nazis in every way they could, giving them thoudsands of tons of oil and resources and working alongside the nazi military. The US was on the ground fighting the Nazis in Africa in 1942 and Europe in 1943. Go learn history.
But USSR had to be in allience with nazies, to prepare to war.
USSR asked Poland, if they wanted USSR army to enter Poland to defend it, but they sad no. British and French didn't even want to speak with USSR, while Germany gave suggestion do not enter USSR-Japan war and USSR shouldn't enter Europe conflicts. It gave USSR chance to stay in piece, finish war with Japan and prepare for hard war with Germany.
You can justify allying with the Nazis any way you like, but in the end, the truth is that Russia allied itself with Nazi germany and then gave them vast resources and critical fuel to help Hitler destroy western Europe. They actively helped the nazis, signed many military and commercial deals with them, and were happy to keep being the Nazis bestest friend if Hitler had not attacked them. So when you brag about what Russia did in the war, dont forget to mention how much you helped the nazis.
Yes, but that was partially British and Fremch falt.They didn't answere on any suggestiones of cooperation with USSR.Poland refused to let USSR troops in its territory for defending Poland
At the same time Hitler had good suggestion.Trading agreement between USSR and Germany and Germany 's promised do not get into USSR-Japan war were good enough for country, that was rebuilding from revolution and civil war at that point, compared with nothing, coming from England, France and Poland.
Alexy, that's crap. The french signed a defence pact with the Soviets in 1934, and it was Stalin who let it expire and refused to renegotiate. There were British and French negotiators IN MOSCOW in 1939, who had been trying to hammer out a deal for weeks, when Stalin suddenly announced the Nazi-Soviet pact. And yes, Poland refused to let Russian troops in, but then Russia had invaded Poland in 1921, and then again in 1939, so it seems they had cause to be worried.
it seems zat u r under influence of ur europaian todays crap mass media-Now lesson to ya-
Soviets had delegations from Fr Uk etc-in usmmer 1939-
Soviets offered 136 regiments in order to make smth preventive vs Hitler agression-\ allies offered nothing\Soviets needed a corridor via Poland and Romania etc-to do zat/These countries refused to give such chance to Ussr-after zat Molotov signed up a pact and soviets got 2 more years to prepare for ww2-
Nrouslan, considering you dont know what lend-lease is, you dont know when jets were invented, and you dont even know who was president of the US at the time, the irony of you accusing anyone else of ignorance is hilarious. Every post of yours contains a basic historical error, one even a 12 year old would spot. And yes Poland refused Soviets access (for good reason), but that doesnt justify signing an alliance with Hitler and actively helping him destroy western Europe.
and talking seriously-it all was made up by hodden ppl-someone overseas wanted Wermacht to fight vs Ussr\of course,under antibolshevik slogans,as usually?like antiterror slogans today,when there is no terror, in the nature ,but just well planned terror by certain ppl\-
No, Rockefellers did not sponsor the NSDAP in 1932, what an absurd claim. Come on, back it up I dare you.
yes, some businesses from every country on earth did business in early 30s Germany, just as they did in early 30s Russia. They stopped when war approached, which is when Stalin decided, as a NATION not as a couple of companies, to sign a friendship deal with Hitler and help him conquer most of Europe. This is reality my friend.
No nrouslan, I think you have made it clear you are unable to argue with me, and your attempt to insult me as you flee like a scared little bitch just deepens your own humiliation.
As I said, you destroyed your OWN credibility in this debate, with your illiterate drivel insanely stupid claims, which even a 12-year old would know were utterly false. Dont blame me for your own lack of basic education and intelligence.
enough with ur faking Poland-do ya know zat Poland offered its help to Wermacht in 38?to fight vs Ussrin order to grab Ukraine\they wanted acces to the Black sea\-but germans thrown them a bone?this bone was piece of Chekoslovakia-etc-U r a home made historian-sitting in a cosy Monaco-hello to ur Princess-
My faking? My friend the ataggering ignorance of history you have displayed here is beyond elief. look, if you dont even know who the leaders of the big three were, you are not even fit to speak on this subject. You semi-literate ramblings about Truman running the US in 1942, and the US sending jets to Russia in lend lease are hilarious, but utterly discredit you. How old are you exactly? Obviouslt you have never attended a high school history class, so I would guess 13?
Firstly, Russia was responsible for the destruction of about 74% of the German military. Secondly, they did this with vast assistance from the west in the form of Lend Lease. Zhukov himself said that without this aid, Russia would not have been able to continue to fight. Thirdly, The US entered the war the same year the USSR did, and the US was fighting the Nazis on the ground in Africa in 1942 and Europe in 1943. And you DARE tell anyone else to learn history you ignorant twerp?
Truman has such idea like helping both sides in order to let them to kill each other as much as it was possible--zat was their main idea /-Cuze after such loss at Dunkirk \1940\allies didnt even think about fighting vs Wermacht-and they landed in Fr in 4 yrs after zat only--
No nrouslan, you are just making things up. First;ly, Truman was not even president, way to demonstrate your 'vast' knowledge of history. LOL. Secondly, The US was fighting the Nazis on the ground in Africa in 1942 and Europe in 1943, and they were supplying VAST quantities of lend-lease aid to russia in the meantime, aid without which Zhukov himself said Russia would have been unable to continue the war.
mb it was Rosevelt-doesnt matter\or you think zat presidents do really rule?\-their plans were like zat--
Dont worry about my knowledges-Its hard to believe zat without Cobra jets-studebekkers-and canned beef ussr wouldnt defeat Wermacht--its not underestimation of the allies"s help at all-
Yes, though if you cant even get the wartime president right, it makes me wonder why we should pay attention to any of your ignorant ramblings. And if you think thats what the US gave to Russia, you are delusional. Also, jets had not even been invented at that point. What are you, 10 years old?
u going to compare african german troops to those,who were fighting at the Eastern front??-ahaha-if u reciting Zukov zen let me recite one german general\his doary-beforeKurskay Duga battle-" we brought our best troops herebest technics-if we wont defeat russians now,zen nobody will do it in decades after us"-
Yes, Russia did a great deal. Congratulations on arguing a point that was never in contention. You should REALLY try and pay attention nrouslan, it would help you look less foolish.
I know the history. And fals they do not know most Hitler troops were fought with the Soviet Union. And the concentration camp camps were released from Soviets (like Auschwitz, for example). So it means the other countries not to end of the war have not contributed, but The Soviet Union the most important role has played is a fact. Except him has fought the USA not on his own ground like it did Russia. And the USA has not gained the same bad experience like it did Russia.
Clearly you do not, based on your past comments. And seeing as you have just abandoned the point about the Nazi-Soviet pact negotiations, I see you admit your ignorance on that matter at least.
Yes, The USSR fought the majority of the German army, nobody is denying that. They did so with extensive assistance from the western allies, who provided vast quantities of aid before they actually fought the Germans in Africa in 42 and Europe in 43. That was never up for debate.
What have I given up?!?! Russia has searched allies in Europe against Hitler before the war. These were France and England have declined. The pact between Hitler and Stalin was verzicht on war if the Nazis the Poles Akkupiert. This is a normal survival tactics. Poland has required wärend of that The Westukraine (Soviet Union) of Hitler fals He attacks the Soviet Union.
The Solte Soviet Union (almost no military has after the revolution) itself
for the country to victims ebenfals like Hitler planned an Akkupation in Soviet?! At that time the Russians few chance was shon Clearly you against modern Hitler's army have. And it was clearly this Hitler attacks (living space in the east "My fight"). Their arguments are ridiculous and basing on silly pride and empty words. Cherchill a war between Nazi and Soviet also wanted.
Actually in the 1930s Russia had a strong military, and was experiementing with advanced tactics unseen anywhere else. Then Stalin decided to execute a huge swath of his own officer corps just because, thus shattering the effectiveness of his own military. Then he decided to sign a friendship deal with the Nazis, and help them destroy the west.
You claimed France and England refused negotiations before the Nazi-Soviet pact was signed, that is absolutely factually false. I listed the vasrious examples of how that is false (there are several) and you never responded. The USSR cut off negotiations with france and England to sign its alliance with the nazis.
So instead the Russians spent the next two years allied with Hitler, fueling his attack on Western Europe while conducting massacres and invasions of their own.
first-idiot from Monaco-western europe wasnt fighting -except Dunkirk battle--
and negotiations between ussr and allies took place in Moscow summer 39-BEFORE M-R pact--U cant put this in to ur mind--so i gave u friendly advise already--get faking lost-
nrouslan, you are obviously throwing a tantrum, because when you get all upset and frustrated and start to cry, your writing becomes less and less comprehensible. Perhaps you should calm down, have a nap, and come back when you learn a language? I have no idea what you were trying to say half the time.
My point stands: Hitler might not have been able to wipe out western Europe without Russian fuel and resources. Thank the Russians for helping their best friends the Nazis every way they could
No you retard, as in you should READ the book, so you might educate yourself. Do you understand what that means? Educate yourself? It means learning facts as opposed to making silly crap up every time you post, as you love doing. You were flat out wrong about the French/ British negotiations, just as you have been flat out wrong about all your made-up crap.
No, negotiations were ongoing at the very moment of the pact's signing., Shall I tell you the names of the negotiators and when they arrived? I happen to have a book about the negotiations on my shelf right here. You might try reading it, assuming you can read, of course.
Western Europe wasn't fighting? Really? So there was no battle of Eban Emael, no drive through the Ardennes, no battle of Hannut, no battle of Sedan?
You idiot, you demonstrate your stupidity every time you post.
That comment was even more illiterate than usual. But I would not speak to the 'ignorancy' (whatever that is) of anyone else. You who didnt even know who the wartime President of the US was, you who thought the US was delivering jets to Russia in lend-lease when they had not even been invented.
If this was a battle of wits, you lost long ago my pathetic little friend, and you have nobody to blame but yourself. Go get an education, if any school will take you.
Firstly, you said 'Cobra jet'. You were not smart enough to realize jets had not even been invented yet, just as you were not smart enough to know who was the wartime president of the United States. Also, the plane you are trying to refer to was not called the cobra at all, it was the p-39 airocobra, which you would knew if you had even the slightest clue about history. Congratulations, you have been wrong in every single thing you have said. At least you are consistent.
The difference is simple. If you cant tell who was president of the US during the war, and if you dont know the difference between a jet and a prop-plane, why on earth should anyone pay any attention to any of your other, equally absurd lies regarding the war? You have proven to everyone here you dont know shit about the topic, and like making lies up which a 10-year old would know were false. You utterly discredited yourself my sad young friend.
>>Zhukov himself said that without this aid, Russia would not have been able to continue to fight
Did you hear that from your US history lessons or you reading wikipedia?
Lend Lease began only when russians defeated germans at Moscow in 1941 (your propaganda ofcause says "winter stopped germans") Then lend lease stopped for 9 month in 1942 when the most bloody battles took place(There was no lend lease during STALINGRAD and KURSK battes) BTW land lease gave USSR only 5%-7% of it's tanks
Go back to Kindergarden. Though the lend-lease protocols only started in October 41, pre-lend lease, for services paid on gold started in June 41. It NEVER stopped, though ATLANTIC convoys were halted for a while, the Person and pacific routes, which accounted for 60% of total aid, never stopped. Or did your colouring book not teach you that fact? Yes most tanks were russian, but 25% of military aircraft and 70% of trucks and jeeps were Western made. Read Zhukov's memoirs, assuming you can read.
Yes.....in tucks and food it was awasome help. But most of the stuff was send in 1943/44/45 when soviets became superior to germans. In 1941/42 this help was like drop in the sea. Do you really belive this red army would lose the war without lend lease? )))
P.S. My bad about stopping for 9 month, i heard in somewhere =/
No actually, most of the lend-lease aid arrived in 1942 and 1943, when it was desperately needed. Dont believe me, believe Stalin who clamoured for more and more aid stating openly that the fate of Russia was on the line. Read Zhukov's memoires, it was HE that said Russia could not have won the war without lend-lease, in particular Russia had run out of explosives and could not even make shells anymore without US supplies, a fact he specifically names as being war-losing without lend-lease.
Only? Stop and think about that. A full third of all explosives used by the Russians was from lend-Lease. And in 1942-43, before Russian industry had recovered, it was more than that. Imagine taking away a third or more of Russian explosives in 1942 and 1943. Also remove 20% of their aircraft, 8% of their tanks, 70% of trucks and jeeps, as well as trains, radios, radar, AA guns: Do you still think Russia could possibly have won? Zhukov didnt.
Russia won in the end because Stalin was willing to absorbe enormous losses and send more troops. World War II decimated an entire generation, but in the end, no matter how many died, Stalin demanded more go to the front line. Had most other countries faced such staggering losses, they surely would have been forced to the bargaining table.
kibabiba, how DARE you tell anyone else to learn history?
Lend-lease never stopped, ever. The North Sea route stopped for 9 months because of German sub activity, but the Persoan and pacific routes never stopped, and the Pacific route alone delivered over 50% of all lend-lease aid.
lend Lease gave Russia 10% of its tanks, but also 25% of its aircraft, 80% of trucks and jeeps and (most importantly according to Zhukov) over 50% of its explosives and shells. Go read a book.
Russia s trys to shake off the latest failed missle test in the Artic from a submarine launch of a Bulava test missle on July15,2009 ended in failure. The sixth since 2005'.
take the penis out of your mouth before typing . This is YouTube. It's a US company owned by Google another US company located in Mtn. View,Ca. you've failed - ' confused me with someone who cares if russia failed over 6 times to successfully launch a Bulava misslle'. gtfoh
no shit? take the dick out of your mouth before typing this is youtube its a russian company owned by russian google another russian company in Moscow View Fuck.
ahedhussein2002 LOOL u are incredible wrong , first : russia has 5 times better engineers and scientists than USA and LOL russia has much much more jets than only 99 omg :D i never saw more stupid comment than yours XD
are you aware that russias fighter jet which is mostly mig-29s over half of them along with other types of jets had to be grounded because of maitenance issues and corrosion - they take off and crashed - and the navy is in the same condition - besides russia has serious problems with population decline russian are dyieying out more they are born- that is why the military is not all what you think it is :)
Russians are great people. Their government can spend trillions on garbage weapons to challenge America and the West. Never cared about the satisfaction of it's citizens. A Russian Doctor can earn 300 times less than our's in America despite the Russian doctor is 300 times better than our's. This is their retarded system. I hope they can focus on better car, washer, dishwasher and computer instead of weapons. Russia has 99 air crafts only. South West only has over 500 jets. WOW
watch?v=2VEhBYV5LwU Russian military video (not slideshow) Jets in action, bombing and doing tricks (Su-47, MiG-35 etc) Tanks (T-80, T-90 etc) S-400, TOR-M1 (anti aircraft systems, missile systems) Navy (Admiral Kuznetsov, Zubr etc) Nuclear/Hydrogen bombs (Tsar Bomba, Daddy of all bombs) Typhoon submarine (Akula, largest in World) Females in Russian army (lol) Some new Russian bombs (ya rly) And alot more
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Through experience, Russian weapons are nothing but total garbage. SU 35 can be the best in maneovering, very fast, great design but the problem is the radar system. Israel shut down 87 Russian planes in 1982 w/o losing one. Radar and computer technology is everything these days to survive your plane from being destroyed.
Hahah We will see about that... PAK FA Will make you americans to shit in pants... and go away comment on some other video for example on some video that is all about american craps...
Its our country that are the masters of democracy mate.Ask the repressed citizenry of iraq about reedom.ask the citizens of vietnam that were over ran by the chinese after the fall of south vietnam.ask the even the french who we liberated from the germans in WW2.Theres lots more gratefull peoples than there are ungratefull.The ungratefull are actually the scum that would crare to do the repressing and those that hate a christian nation. go figure....apparently you didnt ...mate
Здесь показана 9К58 «Смерч» (БМ-30) - америкосы никогда с ней не столкнутся, разве что в локальном конфликте, если Россия их кому-нибудь продаст. Поэтому пугать их этим клипом не стоит. Лучше показать им Тополь-М, Р-36М, Ту-160 и Р-30 3М30 «Булава́-30»Р-30 3М30 «Булава́-30»
um...gwahahaha..This is the same thing that always makes me laugh about new russian weaponry.Its continentally imobile.Its only usefull if the enemy is attacking you in your yard.If russia wanted to attack say south africa(only russia would find a reason)They would have to drive this junk 8 thousand miles.Can you imagine the fuel delivery logistics night mare involved in suppling an army that drives vehicles getting 3 miles to the gallon? The russians never think it through.
If I may, as of January 2009, Russia actually has twelve Su-35 in operation, one of those recently burst into flames on takeoff. None of those have ever been deployed in combat. Six of the aircraft are in fact in use by the Russian stunt pilot group, 'Russian Knights'.
While 12 (now 11) is more than four, it is still a pitifully small number, considering the aircraft has been technically in production for almost 15 years. Russia cannot even afford to mass produce this 4.5 generation fighter.
How's the Su-35 Flunker coming along? Anymore exploded on takeoff lately?
Russia now has three out of its grand total of four left, one is a static test airframe too, so Russia is down to two Su-35 Flunkers, funny stuff for a suppossed superpower!
So how's that severe case of retardation going? Are you brain dead? You're convinced that Russia has only 2 planes in it's arsenal? Are you fucking serious? The only reason any country would have sucha small supply of any war machine is because it's out of service which i doubt the Su-35 is. Also all the UK war machines pale in comparison to Russia as well as the US.
The third flying prototype crashed the other day and was destroyed.
I agree the amount of Uk fighters is less than Russias, however our pilots get four times the flying hours, fly properly maintained machines unlike Russia who's readyness rate is pathetic thanks to lack of spares, personal and pilots. Russian fighter pilots flew just one major excersise last year and thier flying hours are absolutely pityfull, the equivilent of 3rd world nations
Hm, maybe see the funny part is...in WW2 Russian pilots had about 1000 hours less the German Lufthansa and their plains was sock but ...you know what happened.
Are you seriously replying to a comment that old? Alright then. Challanger has nothing on the T-90 or the Abrams. And the Harrier while it is very inevative and the vertical take off is very usefull. I'm talking combat capability wise. While it is better then most I doubt it's beter then it's Russian/US counter parts.
World's largest top 10 software companies 1. Microsoft USA 2. IBM USA 3. Oracle Corporation USA 4. SAP Germany 5. HP USA 6. Computer Sciences Corporation USA 7. Symantec USA 8. Computer Associates USA 9. Nintendo Japan 10. Adobe Systems USA
World's Largest Company by Market Capitalisation 1 ExxonMobil USA 2 General Electric USA 3 Microsoft USA 4 Citigroup USA 5 AT&T USA 6 Bank of America USA 7 Toyota Motor Japan 8 Gazprom Russia 9 PetroChina China 10 Royal Dutch Shell Holland America OWNED YOU AGAIN!
Academic Ranking of World Universities compiled by Shanghai Jiao Tong Universitys Institute of Higher Education 2008. 1.Harvard University USA 2.Stanford University USA 3.University of California, Berkeley USA 4.University of Cambridge UK 5.Massachusetts Institute of Technology USA 6.California Institute of Technology USA 7.Columbia University USA 8.Princeton University USA 9.University of Chicago USA 10University of OxfordUK 11.Yale University USA American Superiority confirmed! Sorry Russia
If U.S. will keep this type of policy it has now it will destroy itself. There is a great disagreement between various political streams inside the country right now. Some scientist think that this could lead to the civil war in U.S. by 2014
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck russian
istanbulgencligi 4 months ago
/watch?v=AEjx4O9bHyM
MilitaryofRussia 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice videos this you tube world just gets bigger every day! When you have time come visit my channel!
simplechocolatediet 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice videos this you tube world just gets bigger every day! When you have time come visit my channel!
truehealthyproducts 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice videos this you tube world just gets bigger every day! When you have time come visit my channel!
TheNitricOxide 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice videos this you tube world just gets bigger every day! When you have time come visit my channel!
FatReleaseSystem 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*Insert ridiculous nationalistic comment concerning military power here.*
Look, Russians, Americans... There are lots of idiots in both our countries. More idiots than intelligent people. Don't let them get under your skin.
Maxables 11 months ago
USSR!
LivingHardcore 11 months ago
@LivingHardcore
CCCP !!!!
JaschaRascha 10 months ago
@milkibay And we in Israel destroyed your stupid Hezbollah asses! With Israeli weapon. Hassan Nasrallah still hiding in his bunker for 4 years. Тупая Хизбала.
MrDimab 1 year ago
Смешно читать комментарии американцев. Как можно жить с таким ограниченным мышлением? Ни малейшего понятия об истории и современной политической обстановке - только штампы и стереотипы. Прочитанное заставило меня поверить в анекдоты об американской тупости. В ваших словах отсутствует элементарная логика.
zFromKazakhstan 1 year ago
always liked russian weapon. Simple and effective . What else do you need?
qwer55555555 1 year ago
hlavne ne na česko 1968 stačil
svobypce 1 year ago
Israel Jerusalim USA, just can suck cook to our big brother Russia, When the times up pick up your gun. Big suport and hello to our brothers from Serbia
vladandada 1 year ago
@vladandada man i can READ your accent
also russians are very bad trained
Krattoffel 1 year ago
@Krattoffel
BS
You made that up.
stalingradComando 1 year ago
Russia's weapons programs are super impressive...by the way, for the record, the music is French...Chronologie IV byJean-Michel Jarre
drzhava73 2 years ago
Russia will have the best army that is for shure
S1av3z3r0o 2 years ago 2
marlo,,,russia is the best usa and europe are lots of stats and they have to make the nato to have a minimal chance against russia, russia is alone against the others, and russia good destroy the half of the usa because of the tsar bomb,biggest atomic bomb in the world.
rednax2 2 years ago
The Tsar bomb was a propaganda stunt, a smaller bomb suspended in a massive tank of deuterium slush to magnify the blast. For years the USSR lied and claimed it was a 100 megaton blast, only admitting it was 48 megatpons at the end of the cold war. It was not, and was never meant to be, deployable as a weapon.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
@CuiusRegio Nemoj da te samo Rus naguzi. I ne nagazi. That means Lets just see when Russian take stape on u. Or When Russia take your ass from behind u just gonna to say, jaikx jaixs. Big hello to brothers from Serbia
vladandada 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Russian believe they would be the best :D xD lol
Europe and USA are best forever
MarloX01 2 years ago
@MarloX01 u r stupid adolecente. goo jurk off and fuck you. Stupid retard from the west.
vladandada 1 year ago
the only countrey that defeded russia was the afghan mujahidin not becouse of weapons tec but by fighting moral just like america was defeded in vietnam never undermin the human capacity of fighting spirit in other words if you just relay on high tech weapons in a war and your oponent are determent you will defentley loose thats what i belive
sangif 2 years ago 2
ONLY country that ever defeated Russia was Afghanistan? Really?
Whay about Poland defeating Russia in 1921, or Germany defeating Russia in 1917, or japan defeating Rusia in 1905, or France and the UK defeating Russia in 1853? Shall I continue?
CuiusRegio 2 years ago 2
@CuiusRegio -its all lie\about 1853\--i told u 100 yrs ago--fak off with ur idiotic comments--stinky polish citizen-
nrouslan 2 years ago
nrouslan, please stop spamming the boards with your illiterate childish scribblings. Nobody can read your misspelled drivel, not that it matters because you never have anything relevant or topical to say at all, just badly scrawled adolescent one-liners: which is as much as your retarded 11-year old mind can manage. Please stop embarassing yourself and your country by speaking.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
i meant soviet union when they were the superpower
sangif 2 years ago
the new sperpower of the world this comminig years wil be Israel and the oppresion of mankind will beging it will be Jeruselem the headqurters of the new world order At its Washington right now you people jst wauit and see And Russia will be crushed by the anglo american Israeli Alliance.
sangif 2 years ago
Да, но Однако на сегодняшний день Америка является сверхдержавой
morewar210 2 years ago
в смысле--америка должна 55 триллиона--Да-это правда-сверхдержава!---и 651 биллион в милитари--!--Говори-Я -баобаб-я-баобаб-\10000 раз\--и станешь баобабом.--лет через 10.
nrouslan 2 years ago 7
@morewar210 derjava is a russia and we must fuck all world with our weapons
derjava 1 year ago
Я до сих пор считают, что Америка имеет лучшее оружие
morewar210 2 years ago
Люди - главное оружие. А здесь, я думаю, пока паритет. "Пока" - потому что, судя по всему, Америка прилагает больше усилий к уничтожению своего человеческого потенциала, чем кто либо другой.
SmDMitr 2 years ago 12
wow-u said--we think--It means zat u ve turned in to 1000 ss pieces after facing the russian missile---rest in peace-you were a nice guy.
nrouslan 2 years ago
Что ты говоришь, я всегда был хорошим парнем
morewar210 2 years ago
верю--оставайся хорошими парнями----
-так меньше вони.
nrouslan 2 years ago
I live in PHILIPPINES, I think RUSSIA is the second of most powerful country in the world.
marcschuck 2 years ago 2
@marcschuck
and you think US are the first?
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind yes, but they are almost the same level in power, anytime russia could defeat US
marcschuck 1 year ago
@marcschuck sure they can ^^
dropping thair 12000 nuclear bombs will blow up the shit out of america
furthermore
they can blow up america and half of europe
america has just about 9600 devices, france about 300
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind dropping bomb or shooting through missiles???
marcschuck 1 year ago
@marcschuck
you know exactly what i mean
^^ but i'm pretty sure the bombs are allready in there
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind hey man why bomb USA ?
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun
usa is a nation of lying waraddicted terrorists
everywhere where is a war... united states are not far away..
i mean us-soldiers are in about 30 nations in northern afrika..
they are still in germany and japan
why? do they think thair forces are welcome in germany for example? sure not
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind thats not a reason to bomb the US there are millions of inocent people here and if the US troops are not welcome u cant do anything about it,hating america is getting old man,they are US troops in a lot of countries because that is a strategy the world hates the US because they are envious,nothing more nothing less,german soldiers r in afganistan too so i think they r terrorists too
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun
"billions of innocent people"
why does those innocent people dont do anyhting against the iraq and afghan conflict? there are innocent people too which die because of american force
is someone who dont do anyhting against a injustice realy innocent in your eyes?
in my eyes, the person who hurts someone and another who just stay there and watch this are both nocent
german troops are in afghan because they are in nato and were "forced" to join the conflict
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind it doesnt matter why they are there,they are killing talibans too as well as royal marines (from UK) are there killing talibans too,french troops are there too so if the US troops are terrorists then all these countries's troops are terrorists too,please u r not making any sense it is obvious that u hate the US for no reason,americans havent done anything to u,even if on american did something to u it doesnt mean they are all the same
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun german troops dont get into conflicts
they dont fight the taliban
thats not thair mission
only thing is if they get attacked, they fire back
bundeswehrs mission is humanitary help
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind lol stop making excuses man german troops are doing the same shit,who's the dumb soldier that wants to kill a inocent person ?please..............
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun i dont see any reasons why i should do excuses..
i dont have anything to do with german troops or germany itself
except of that i stury in there
and german troops cant do such missions like your nations
our constitution forbids it (thats nuber one)
second thing is... the allies (including the us) forbid it to germany after second world war
so german troops cant do the "same shit" like you call it
and obama argues to merkel that they should do the same shit.. but that guy is hularious
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind my nation ?im not american,however i lived here and remember that there are a lot of foreigners living here,the US should not be bombed,people who think america should be bombed are inhuman assholes and racists,if the US wanted to kill inocent people they could have just nuked the entire country or city by city and u know what ?they can,but they wont do it,it doesnt matter whats the reason germans are there it dosent change the fact that they are killing talibans too
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun
wait a second.. racist?
american is not a race
its even no nationality, its just a word which which is written in your pasport
a chinese which is born in the us and has the us citizentship, will always be a chinese
dont you read my comment?
germany does not killing taliban except of the case that they get attacked
german troops have no right to attack a person from another state if they wont get attacked before
THAT is a fact
read my last comment again please
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind just like an american is born in china and he will always an american,u r not making any sense stop trying to cover germans they were by far the biggest terrorist the world has ever had,USA is been just a victim of terrorism,why the world hates the US ?only one answer,ENVY that is all
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun i could give you several answers
bigheadness, overestimation of one's own capabilities
view on other nations
i dont even want to cover germans, i dont have a reason for that
its just uss schizophrenic position
on the one hand you forbidded germany to do any military missions using firearms except of protecting thair own life
on the other hand you force them to interfere in that afghan question
thats what i cant understand
us dont even know what they want
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind i didnt forbid germans do this or do that cuz im not american i just live here,remember that soldier only follow orders,do u think US troops are fighting for terror ? thats a big NO,they are trying to survive and go home and as u can see most of them very young,there's no reason to bomb the US that is a very inhuman thing to do
yandykun 1 year ago
@yandykun they are not fighting to survive..
you can tell that an american fights in afghanistan to survive.. thats hilarous
you can tell that to a russian or to a frensh one because they have a thing called conscription
us soldiers fight for money
nobody in world forces them to go to the army because they have no conscription
sure in the moment they get attacked they fight to survive
but they dont have to go to the army and dont have to get into that situation
gazakind 1 year ago
@gazakind they r fighting for money ?now i know that u have no fucking brain u r the dumbest person on earth i rest my case everyone who hates the US is either envious and jealous or stupid i wont reply u anymore good bye keep hating america that only make her stronger germans were real terrorist
yandykun 1 year ago
gazakind 1 year ago
@yandykun hehehe typical yankee :p
Ricksonk 1 year ago
dyies yiez biyutifulzz (this is beautiful , with Russian accent)
LeMousqueteerBleu 2 years ago 2
all i know if USA don't win in ww2 russia and china are under the control of germany and japan now
yurikviking11 2 years ago
Learn history.
80% of Nazi soldiers are fought in the east front and died.
The USA have joined the war only in 1944 when the Hitler's army lost in Wolgograd, and Russians went in the direction of Germany.
Russia has supported China.
Americans have added only then in war. and Have shouted afterwards the victory to them is to be owed. How they always do this.
Alex1983demo 2 years ago 3
Actually, about 74% of German soldiers died in the East, though only about 15% of the Luftwaffe and none of the Kriegsmarine. The US joined the war in exactly the same year as the USSR, the difference being the USSR had spent the previous two year helping out their allies the Nazis in every way they could, giving them thoudsands of tons of oil and resources and working alongside the nazi military. The US was on the ground fighting the Nazis in Africa in 1942 and Europe in 1943. Go learn history.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
But USSR had to be in allience with nazies, to prepare to war.
USSR asked Poland, if they wanted USSR army to enter Poland to defend it, but they sad no. British and French didn't even want to speak with USSR, while Germany gave suggestion do not enter USSR-Japan war and USSR shouldn't enter Europe conflicts. It gave USSR chance to stay in piece, finish war with Japan and prepare for hard war with Germany.
Learn history
AlexeyFromRussia 2 years ago
...our common groud now should be the borderline at the river Neman?
SS4thD 2 years ago
You can justify allying with the Nazis any way you like, but in the end, the truth is that Russia allied itself with Nazi germany and then gave them vast resources and critical fuel to help Hitler destroy western Europe. They actively helped the nazis, signed many military and commercial deals with them, and were happy to keep being the Nazis bestest friend if Hitler had not attacked them. So when you brag about what Russia did in the war, dont forget to mention how much you helped the nazis.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Yes, but that was partially British and Fremch falt.They didn't answere on any suggestiones of cooperation with USSR.Poland refused to let USSR troops in its territory for defending Poland
At the same time Hitler had good suggestion.Trading agreement between USSR and Germany and Germany 's promised do not get into USSR-Japan war were good enough for country, that was rebuilding from revolution and civil war at that point, compared with nothing, coming from England, France and Poland.
AlexeyFromRussia 2 years ago
Alexy, that's crap. The french signed a defence pact with the Soviets in 1934, and it was Stalin who let it expire and refused to renegotiate. There were British and French negotiators IN MOSCOW in 1939, who had been trying to hammer out a deal for weeks, when Stalin suddenly announced the Nazi-Soviet pact. And yes, Poland refused to let Russian troops in, but then Russia had invaded Poland in 1921, and then again in 1939, so it seems they had cause to be worried.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Cuis-
it seems zat u r under influence of ur europaian todays crap mass media-Now lesson to ya-
Soviets had delegations from Fr Uk etc-in usmmer 1939-
Soviets offered 136 regiments in order to make smth preventive vs Hitler agression-\ allies offered nothing\Soviets needed a corridor via Poland and Romania etc-to do zat/These countries refused to give such chance to Ussr-after zat Molotov signed up a pact and soviets got 2 more years to prepare for ww2-
nrouslan 2 years ago
Nrouslan, considering you dont know what lend-lease is, you dont know when jets were invented, and you dont even know who was president of the US at the time, the irony of you accusing anyone else of ignorance is hilarious. Every post of yours contains a basic historical error, one even a 12 year old would spot. And yes Poland refused Soviets access (for good reason), but that doesnt justify signing an alliance with Hitler and actively helping him destroy western Europe.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Cuise-
and talking seriously-it all was made up by hodden ppl-someone overseas wanted Wermacht to fight vs Ussr\of course,under antibolshevik slogans,as usually?like antiterror slogans today,when there is no terror, in the nature ,but just well planned terror by certain ppl\-
nrouslan 2 years ago
hidden ppl-wanted to type-
to hell---
who wanted 2 main europian powers to fight vs each other?-Who sponsored HItlers party in 32?? -Rockfellers-
etc--And-wow-today mass media blame Ussr for WW2-!
--- turn off the lights!!
nrouslan 2 years ago
No, Rockefellers did not sponsor the NSDAP in 1932, what an absurd claim. Come on, back it up I dare you.
yes, some businesses from every country on earth did business in early 30s Germany, just as they did in early 30s Russia. They stopped when war approached, which is when Stalin decided, as a NATION not as a couple of companies, to sign a friendship deal with Hitler and help him conquer most of Europe. This is reality my friend.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
u think i gonna argue with 39-y old \ur IQ =12 y old kid\-
asshole from Monaco??--get faking lost--NObrainwasher
nrouslan 2 years ago
No nrouslan, I think you have made it clear you are unable to argue with me, and your attempt to insult me as you flee like a scared little bitch just deepens your own humiliation.
As I said, you destroyed your OWN credibility in this debate, with your illiterate drivel insanely stupid claims, which even a 12-year old would know were utterly false. Dont blame me for your own lack of basic education and intelligence.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
enough with ur faking Poland-do ya know zat Poland offered its help to Wermacht in 38?to fight vs Ussrin order to grab Ukraine\they wanted acces to the Black sea\-but germans thrown them a bone?this bone was piece of Chekoslovakia-etc-U r a home made historian-sitting in a cosy Monaco-hello to ur Princess-
nrouslan 2 years ago
"Poland is a pain in the ass of Europe"-
---
\W.Churchill\
nrouslan 2 years ago
My faking? My friend the ataggering ignorance of history you have displayed here is beyond elief. look, if you dont even know who the leaders of the big three were, you are not even fit to speak on this subject. You semi-literate ramblings about Truman running the US in 1942, and the US sending jets to Russia in lend lease are hilarious, but utterly discredit you. How old are you exactly? Obviouslt you have never attended a high school history class, so I would guess 13?
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
im 5 ,and u can go to hell,idiot
nrouslan 2 years ago
Firstly, Russia was responsible for the destruction of about 74% of the German military. Secondly, they did this with vast assistance from the west in the form of Lend Lease. Zhukov himself said that without this aid, Russia would not have been able to continue to fight. Thirdly, The US entered the war the same year the USSR did, and the US was fighting the Nazis on the ground in Africa in 1942 and Europe in 1943. And you DARE tell anyone else to learn history you ignorant twerp?
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Truman has such idea like helping both sides in order to let them to kill each other as much as it was possible--zat was their main idea /-Cuze after such loss at Dunkirk \1940\allies didnt even think about fighting vs Wermacht-and they landed in Fr in 4 yrs after zat only--
nrouslan 2 years ago
No nrouslan, you are just making things up. First;ly, Truman was not even president, way to demonstrate your 'vast' knowledge of history. LOL. Secondly, The US was fighting the Nazis on the ground in Africa in 1942 and Europe in 1943, and they were supplying VAST quantities of lend-lease aid to russia in the meantime, aid without which Zhukov himself said Russia would have been unable to continue the war.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Cuis-
mb it was Rosevelt-doesnt matter\or you think zat presidents do really rule?\-their plans were like zat--
Dont worry about my knowledges-Its hard to believe zat without Cobra jets-studebekkers-and canned beef ussr wouldnt defeat Wermacht--its not underestimation of the allies"s help at all-
nrouslan 2 years ago
Yes, though if you cant even get the wartime president right, it makes me wonder why we should pay attention to any of your ignorant ramblings. And if you think thats what the US gave to Russia, you are delusional. Also, jets had not even been invented at that point. What are you, 10 years old?
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
u going to compare african german troops to those,who were fighting at the Eastern front??-ahaha-if u reciting Zukov zen let me recite one german general\his doary-beforeKurskay Duga battle-" we brought our best troops herebest technics-if we wont defeat russians now,zen nobody will do it in decades after us"-
they lost as we know-
nrouslan 2 years ago
"generals diary"--
i wanted to type-
its high time to get it finally--
nrouslan 2 years ago
Yes, Russia did a great deal. Congratulations on arguing a point that was never in contention. You should REALLY try and pay attention nrouslan, it would help you look less foolish.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
I know the history. And fals they do not know most Hitler troops were fought with the Soviet Union. And the concentration camp camps were released from Soviets (like Auschwitz, for example). So it means the other countries not to end of the war have not contributed, but The Soviet Union the most important role has played is a fact. Except him has fought the USA not on his own ground like it did Russia. And the USA has not gained the same bad experience like it did Russia.
Alex1983demo 2 years ago
Clearly you do not, based on your past comments. And seeing as you have just abandoned the point about the Nazi-Soviet pact negotiations, I see you admit your ignorance on that matter at least.
Yes, The USSR fought the majority of the German army, nobody is denying that. They did so with extensive assistance from the western allies, who provided vast quantities of aid before they actually fought the Germans in Africa in 42 and Europe in 43. That was never up for debate.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
What have I given up?!?! Russia has searched allies in Europe against Hitler before the war. These were France and England have declined. The pact between Hitler and Stalin was verzicht on war if the Nazis the Poles Akkupiert. This is a normal survival tactics. Poland has required wärend of that The Westukraine (Soviet Union) of Hitler fals He attacks the Soviet Union.
Alex1983demo 2 years ago
The Solte Soviet Union (almost no military has after the revolution) itself
for the country to victims ebenfals like Hitler planned an Akkupation in Soviet?! At that time the Russians few chance was shon Clearly you against modern Hitler's army have. And it was clearly this Hitler attacks (living space in the east "My fight"). Their arguments are ridiculous and basing on silly pride and empty words. Cherchill a war between Nazi and Soviet also wanted.
Alex1983demo 2 years ago
Actually in the 1930s Russia had a strong military, and was experiementing with advanced tactics unseen anywhere else. Then Stalin decided to execute a huge swath of his own officer corps just because, thus shattering the effectiveness of his own military. Then he decided to sign a friendship deal with the Nazis, and help them destroy the west.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Alex-do switch on to smth diff--Zat idiot from Monaco is out of any comments--typical brainwasher--
nrouslan 2 years ago
You claimed France and England refused negotiations before the Nazi-Soviet pact was signed, that is absolutely factually false. I listed the vasrious examples of how that is false (there are several) and you never responded. The USSR cut off negotiations with france and England to sign its alliance with the nazis.
So instead the Russians spent the next two years allied with Hitler, fueling his attack on Western Europe while conducting massacres and invasions of their own.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
first-idiot from Monaco-western europe wasnt fighting -except Dunkirk battle--
and negotiations between ussr and allies took place in Moscow summer 39-BEFORE M-R pact--U cant put this in to ur mind--so i gave u friendly advise already--get faking lost-
nrouslan 2 years ago
"to destroy the west" --
and tell us how "bad" nazis destroyed the west??--
Ur brainwash stupidity is even more impressive zan american stupidity--
nrouslan 2 years ago
nrouslan, you are obviously throwing a tantrum, because when you get all upset and frustrated and start to cry, your writing becomes less and less comprehensible. Perhaps you should calm down, have a nap, and come back when you learn a language? I have no idea what you were trying to say half the time.
My point stands: Hitler might not have been able to wipe out western Europe without Russian fuel and resources. Thank the Russians for helping their best friends the Nazis every way they could
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
it seems zat u r bored like hell-find smth else--who zi hell would listen to ur"book"??--so let it stay on ur shelf--
--eternal teen-
nrouslan 2 years ago
No you retard, as in you should READ the book, so you might educate yourself. Do you understand what that means? Educate yourself? It means learning facts as opposed to making silly crap up every time you post, as you love doing. You were flat out wrong about the French/ British negotiations, just as you have been flat out wrong about all your made-up crap.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
No, negotiations were ongoing at the very moment of the pact's signing., Shall I tell you the names of the negotiators and when they arrived? I happen to have a book about the negotiations on my shelf right here. You might try reading it, assuming you can read, of course.
Western Europe wasn't fighting? Really? So there was no battle of Eban Emael, no drive through the Ardennes, no battle of Hannut, no battle of Sedan?
You idiot, you demonstrate your stupidity every time you post.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
u r not tired of blaming someones ignorancy? when u r bullshitting non stop here ?--
- brainless dwarf from Monaco-
nrouslan 2 years ago
That comment was even more illiterate than usual. But I would not speak to the 'ignorancy' (whatever that is) of anyone else. You who didnt even know who the wartime President of the US was, you who thought the US was delivering jets to Russia in lend-lease when they had not even been invented.
If this was a battle of wits, you lost long ago my pathetic little friend, and you have nobody to blame but yourself. Go get an education, if any school will take you.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
plane "Cobra" wasnt invented?-zen soviets were flying on the carpets?-
nrouslan 2 years ago
Firstly, you said 'Cobra jet'. You were not smart enough to realize jets had not even been invented yet, just as you were not smart enough to know who was the wartime president of the United States. Also, the plane you are trying to refer to was not called the cobra at all, it was the p-39 airocobra, which you would knew if you had even the slightest clue about history. Congratulations, you have been wrong in every single thing you have said. At least you are consistent.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
u probably have 1\one\ book on ur one shelf--which s a progress -
does it make diff what Prezident usa had in ww2 or how to call Cobra?-jet-bomber-airplane flying carpet--
U are a nag---
k
nrouslan 2 years ago
The difference is simple. If you cant tell who was president of the US during the war, and if you dont know the difference between a jet and a prop-plane, why on earth should anyone pay any attention to any of your other, equally absurd lies regarding the war? You have proven to everyone here you dont know shit about the topic, and like making lies up which a 10-year old would know were false. You utterly discredited yourself my sad young friend.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
>>Zhukov himself said that without this aid, Russia would not have been able to continue to fight
Did you hear that from your US history lessons or you reading wikipedia?
Lend Lease began only when russians defeated germans at Moscow in 1941 (your propaganda ofcause says "winter stopped germans") Then lend lease stopped for 9 month in 1942 when the most bloody battles took place(There was no lend lease during STALINGRAD and KURSK battes) BTW land lease gave USSR only 5%-7% of it's tanks
kibabiba 2 years ago
Go back to Kindergarden. Though the lend-lease protocols only started in October 41, pre-lend lease, for services paid on gold started in June 41. It NEVER stopped, though ATLANTIC convoys were halted for a while, the Person and pacific routes, which accounted for 60% of total aid, never stopped. Or did your colouring book not teach you that fact? Yes most tanks were russian, but 25% of military aircraft and 70% of trucks and jeeps were Western made. Read Zhukov's memoirs, assuming you can read.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Yes.....in tucks and food it was awasome help. But most of the stuff was send in 1943/44/45 when soviets became superior to germans. In 1941/42 this help was like drop in the sea. Do you really belive this red army would lose the war without lend lease? )))
P.S. My bad about stopping for 9 month, i heard in somewhere =/
kibabiba 2 years ago
No actually, most of the lend-lease aid arrived in 1942 and 1943, when it was desperately needed. Dont believe me, believe Stalin who clamoured for more and more aid stating openly that the fate of Russia was on the line. Read Zhukov's memoires, it was HE that said Russia could not have won the war without lend-lease, in particular Russia had run out of explosives and could not even make shells anymore without US supplies, a fact he specifically names as being war-losing without lend-lease.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
>>run out of explosives
There was a lack of explosives, but only 1/3 of explosives was given by lend lease.
Germans were weak after moscow, stalingrad and kursk......it was unreal for them to repeat Barabarosa again.
kibabiba 2 years ago
Only? Stop and think about that. A full third of all explosives used by the Russians was from lend-Lease. And in 1942-43, before Russian industry had recovered, it was more than that. Imagine taking away a third or more of Russian explosives in 1942 and 1943. Also remove 20% of their aircraft, 8% of their tanks, 70% of trucks and jeeps, as well as trains, radios, radar, AA guns: Do you still think Russia could possibly have won? Zhukov didnt.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Russia won in the end because Stalin was willing to absorbe enormous losses and send more troops. World War II decimated an entire generation, but in the end, no matter how many died, Stalin demanded more go to the front line. Had most other countries faced such staggering losses, they surely would have been forced to the bargaining table.
DrBuzz0 2 years ago 2
kibabiba, how DARE you tell anyone else to learn history?
Lend-lease never stopped, ever. The North Sea route stopped for 9 months because of German sub activity, but the Persoan and pacific routes never stopped, and the Pacific route alone delivered over 50% of all lend-lease aid.
lend Lease gave Russia 10% of its tanks, but also 25% of its aircraft, 80% of trucks and jeeps and (most importantly according to Zhukov) over 50% of its explosives and shells. Go read a book.
CuiusRegio 2 years ago
Here because of such as you all world considers the Yankee as idiots
sevdalin84 2 years ago
yuirik-idiotik-
of course everyone knows zat if not Usa army ,zen we would be sitting under control of persian king Darius\6 cent. bc\-
and Usa also defeated Napoleon in 1812,,dont forget
nrouslan 2 years ago
they did not show the true power of that missile weapon! ♫▐:0
Czaendermajer 2 years ago
узнаю полигон Капустин Яр)))
STARLEY981 2 years ago
Bulava epic fail 6 times assfag.
fluffy1931 2 years ago 2
for fluffy193: Bulava is a bad idea itself. Old missiles for submarines are better
MajorDumai 2 years ago
Russia s trys to shake off the latest failed missle test in the Artic from a submarine launch of a Bulava test missle on July15,2009 ended in failure. The sixth since 2005'.
fluffy1931 2 years ago
sheepfaker-
RF had good tests in Arctic circle--
Bulava is another story--
u bloody idiot
nrouslan 2 years ago
so? every country had failed tests even america when they tried the atomic bomb so stfu idiot FUCKFAG ASSFAG MOTHER FUCKING FAG
ilias2oo6 2 years ago
take the penis out of your mouth before typing . This is YouTube. It's a US company owned by Google another US company located in Mtn. View,Ca. you've failed - ' confused me with someone who cares if russia failed over 6 times to successfully launch a Bulava misslle'. gtfoh
fluffy1931 2 years ago
no shit? take the dick out of your mouth before typing this is youtube its a russian company owned by russian google another russian company in Moscow View Fuck.
Youre failed
your a cunt
you suck my dick
nuff said
you mother Facker
ilias2oo6 2 years ago
yawn.
fluffy1931 2 years ago
we own yawn we nuke us in 1 second lmao and your destroyed
ilias2oo6 2 years ago
yawn.
fluffy1931 2 years ago
yawn i owned you aha
yawn
suck me
yawn yayaya yawn lmao i fuck you lamo
ilias2oo6 2 years ago
yawn.
fluffy1931 2 years ago
ahedhussein2002 LOOL u are incredible wrong , first : russia has 5 times better engineers and scientists than USA and LOL russia has much much more jets than only 99 omg :D i never saw more stupid comment than yours XD
Matto623 2 years ago
are you aware that russias fighter jet which is mostly mig-29s over half of them along with other types of jets had to be grounded because of maitenance issues and corrosion - they take off and crashed - and the navy is in the same condition - besides russia has serious problems with population decline russian are dyieying out more they are born- that is why the military is not all what you think it is :)
6308281 2 years ago
lol stupid retard, I have explain that several times and you fail to say an intelligent answer, please kill you
jtlwvsc100 2 years ago
Name of the song?
clovinho83 2 years ago
Russians are great people. Their government can spend trillions on garbage weapons to challenge America and the West. Never cared about the satisfaction of it's citizens. A Russian Doctor can earn 300 times less than our's in America despite the Russian doctor is 300 times better than our's. This is their retarded system. I hope they can focus on better car, washer, dishwasher and computer instead of weapons. Russia has 99 air crafts only. South West only has over 500 jets. WOW
ahedhussein2002 2 years ago
Какво срање овај таврља јебо мајку.... Шта сереш ти јебо те...What is wrong with your brain?
marintoss 2 years ago
Dimneh 2 years ago
die NATO!
blackpaladinking 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Through experience, Russian weapons are nothing but total garbage. SU 35 can be the best in maneovering, very fast, great design but the problem is the radar system. Israel shut down 87 Russian planes in 1982 w/o losing one. Radar and computer technology is everything these days to survive your plane from being destroyed.
ahedhussein2002 2 years ago
what do know about su 35 radar dumb ??
the su 35 has a long range radar and can track 12 targets and engage 8 simultaniously
"computer tech " it's called avionics dumb!!
DragonlordXV 2 years ago
Hahah We will see about that... PAK FA Will make you americans to shit in pants... and go away comment on some other video for example on some video that is all about american craps...
marintoss 2 years ago
Its our country that are the masters of democracy mate.Ask the repressed citizenry of iraq about reedom.ask the citizens of vietnam that were over ran by the chinese after the fall of south vietnam.ask the even the french who we liberated from the germans in WW2.Theres lots more gratefull peoples than there are ungratefull.The ungratefull are actually the scum that would crare to do the repressing and those that hate a christian nation. go figure....apparently you didnt ...mate
mastersduhgree 2 years ago
А кто совсем не в курсе, тем показать АК-47, МиГ-15, Ми-24 и Ту-95, они их хоть по Дискавери или в фильме про Рембу видели
lesikusUA 2 years ago
Здесь показана 9К58 «Смерч» (БМ-30) - америкосы никогда с ней не столкнутся, разве что в локальном конфликте, если Россия их кому-нибудь продаст. Поэтому пугать их этим клипом не стоит. Лучше показать им Тополь-М, Р-36М, Ту-160 и Р-30 3М30 «Булава́-30»Р-30 3М30 «Булава́-30»
lesikusUA 2 years ago
um...gwahahaha..This is the same thing that always makes me laugh about new russian weaponry.Its continentally imobile.Its only usefull if the enemy is attacking you in your yard.If russia wanted to attack say south africa(only russia would find a reason)They would have to drive this junk 8 thousand miles.Can you imagine the fuel delivery logistics night mare involved in suppling an army that drives vehicles getting 3 miles to the gallon? The russians never think it through.
mastersduhgree 2 years ago
"Only Russia would find a reason"?
I think its your country that are the masters of iligitimate war mate...
Connelly90 2 years ago
I wonder who they stole this from?
gregrutz 2 years ago
ure classic american cock sucker ;)
Rajce89 2 years ago
PPPEEEENNNNIIIISSSSS
AJtheGREAT10 2 years ago
cool
Dmailaa 2 years ago
Why don't you start up a fund and call it LITTLE BOY KALIESTRA and see if you can get some extra money for a new education.
goleafbudsgo 2 years ago 2
well Russians dont need to get back only you have to get in
and btw you have now problems, big problems with Russia because of Europa Shield project
edisGW 2 years ago
this is the thing that make me like the russian weapon system because, it is simple but dealy. giving hi fire power!
specops021 2 years ago
SouthUKGuy...
Don't misstake SU-35 and SU-35BM
One of four SU's that burned is SU-35BM is complitly new mashine and significaly different from SU-35.
SU-35bm is in the test stage and gonna go in to production in the next few years. SU-35 is long time ago canceled project.
KALIESTRA...
NO comment!!! read something about SU-35 , SU-35BM and "russian kinight" FGS before show everyone how retarded u are...
esta1982 2 years ago
If I may, as of January 2009, Russia actually has twelve Su-35 in operation, one of those recently burst into flames on takeoff. None of those have ever been deployed in combat. Six of the aircraft are in fact in use by the Russian stunt pilot group, 'Russian Knights'.
While 12 (now 11) is more than four, it is still a pitifully small number, considering the aircraft has been technically in production for almost 15 years. Russia cannot even afford to mass produce this 4.5 generation fighter.
KaIiestra 2 years ago
How's the Su-35 Flunker coming along? Anymore exploded on takeoff lately?
Russia now has three out of its grand total of four left, one is a static test airframe too, so Russia is down to two Su-35 Flunkers, funny stuff for a suppossed superpower!
SouthUKGuy 2 years ago
So how's that severe case of retardation going? Are you brain dead? You're convinced that Russia has only 2 planes in it's arsenal? Are you fucking serious? The only reason any country would have sucha small supply of any war machine is because it's out of service which i doubt the Su-35 is. Also all the UK war machines pale in comparison to Russia as well as the US.
nemis010 2 years ago
Russia has two Su-35s.
That is a hard fact.
The third flying prototype crashed the other day and was destroyed.
I agree the amount of Uk fighters is less than Russias, however our pilots get four times the flying hours, fly properly maintained machines unlike Russia who's readyness rate is pathetic thanks to lack of spares, personal and pilots. Russian fighter pilots flew just one major excersise last year and thier flying hours are absolutely pityfull, the equivilent of 3rd world nations
SouthUKGuy 2 years ago
Hm, maybe see the funny part is...in WW2 Russian pilots had about 1000 hours less the German Lufthansa and their plains was sock but ...you know what happened.
scuba36fun 2 years ago
"all the UK war machines pale in comparison to Russia as well as the US"
Try the challanger tank and the Harrier jump jet?
Connelly90 2 years ago
Are you seriously replying to a comment that old? Alright then. Challanger has nothing on the T-90 or the Abrams. And the Harrier while it is very inevative and the vertical take off is very usefull. I'm talking combat capability wise. While it is better then most I doubt it's beter then it's Russian/US counter parts.
nemis010 2 years ago
i'm a russian MIG32 pilot, shut your mouth and behave..!
mawaquemabalacat 2 years ago
Yeah and i'm an astronaut in my spare time too!
Grow up son.
SouthUKGuy 2 years ago
World's largest top 10 software companies 1. Microsoft USA 2. IBM USA 3. Oracle Corporation USA 4. SAP Germany 5. HP USA 6. Computer Sciences Corporation USA 7. Symantec USA 8. Computer Associates USA 9. Nintendo Japan 10. Adobe Systems USA
Where is 3rd world Russia :(
MissTeenTexas 2 years ago
1) the biggest nuclear weapon - Russian.
All listed any more has no value.
Maximuss87 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
MissTeenTexas 2 years ago
Who cares about capitalization?
I'm sure you dont even know what this word means. When your parents will lost their pensions we will talk abt capitalization then, you retard.
goody1984rambler 2 years ago 2
MissTeenTexas 2 years ago
id say,,, l8dell is an idiot. hahaha
ganarzon 2 years ago
If U.S. will keep this type of policy it has now it will destroy itself. There is a great disagreement between various political streams inside the country right now. Some scientist think that this could lead to the civil war in U.S. by 2014
l8dell 2 years ago
I8dell, what an amusing lie you just made up. is that your 'thing' to troll the forums posting absurd, laughable lies and hope nobody notices?
KaIiestra 2 years ago
BULGARI and RUSSIA :*:*:*:*:*:*
luxor4o 2 years ago