Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (87)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mas conocido como flato solar.

  • Awesome!!

  • This is what the sun does after a hard days work.

  • This is really cool!!! If you look really close it looks like the mortal combat logo B-)

  • @EnterTheTerrible Sure, no problem. Links are on my channel in my profile. It may take some time to get all of the information consolidated but i will work on it as soon as i have the time.

  • IT'S OVER 9000 ! :O

    Well, this is just epic. (: I love such things: nothing extreme enough for me!

  • What they are doing is creating a bunch of Disinformation to blame their fake "climate change" Agenda on. In reality it is HAARP that is creating the natural disasters. Not the sun, or Nibiru..

  • @jh4dc5s

    Yeah? You think something man made or a fictional dwarf star have more of an effect on the planet than the SUN?

    Where's your proof that HAARP is responsible for creating the natural disasters?

  • @EnterTheTerrible The research I have done leads me to believe that they can use HAARP to create Earthquakes, Floods, Tornadoes, Sandstorms, Hailstorms, Hurricanes, and possibly induce an Earthquake. The proof is in the Patents. I'm not going to do your research for you but i can tell you that the U.S. Govt. put out an OFFICIAL document entitled Owning the Weather by 2025.

  • @jh4dc5s

    The research you've done? which you can't site beyond Dr. Eastlund's patents which explain what is *possible* and not what HAARP has specifically been used for? Yeah - i've done research into HAARP and there's no evidence of what you suggest or it would have been proven and HAARP dismantled for breech of SEVERAL different laws.

    Links to official document please, I can't find a credible source on Google Scholar for "Owning the Weather by 2025"

  • @EnterTheTerrible I know. The HAARP patents dont explain the whole geo-engineering process. Its gives the capabilities of the Machine. You have to put that information into relationship to the physics that drive the Weather. Only then will you understand truly how things can be done and how HAARP can effect the Weather.

    Link to Owning the Weather

    csat(dot)au(dot)af(dot)mil/202­5/volume3/vol3ch15(dot)pdf

  • Comment removed

  • @EnterTheTerrible I'm pretty sure there is direct evidence to Weather Manipulation By HAARP over the Unites States. But I'm sure it's stored on a secured computer at the HAARP facility or somewhere else.

    I doubt they will let you waltz in there and get a copy of one of their hard drives.

  • @jh4dc5s

    Yeah, like i said - no proof.

    I hear what you're sayin man but without proof there's no hope in hell of changing anything. I mean you can try, but you'll just get arrested, lol.

  • @EnterTheTerrible The proof exists. It's just not assessable by Civilians. You can Photograph Geo-Engineering all day long (chemtrails) etc. But it's not considered "evidence" because it doesn't put things in a broader perspective.

  • @jh4dc5s

    Not putting things into a broad perspective isn't why something wouldn't be considered evidence... it's because it's not directly related, lol.

    Observing the phenomenology and being able to say certain things are characteristic of HAARP and not a natural mechanism would be a start for example.

  • @EnterTheTerrible That's kind of what i mean. It's not being put in a spectrum broad enough to as show it being Directly Related to weather modification, Filming Chemtrails i mean.

    The link to owning the weather is also on my blog.

  • @jh4dc5s

    Yeah I don't get what you mean. Observations that would relate these natural disasters to HAARP instead of a natural mechanism is kind of what you mean? The evidence dictates the context, not vice versa.

  • @EnterTheTerrible "Observations that would relate these natural disasters to HAARP instead of a natural mechanism is kind of what you mean?"

    Yes Exactly.

    Please take a look at these two videos.

    /watch?v=xe1Mx0bRZrg

    /watch?v=ggMpWKkURw8

    Please note that i know exactly what is going on in this video and how this is directly related to this latest deadly major tornado outbreak across the U.S.

    More information about this will be on my blog in the coming weeks.

  • @jh4dc5s

    Yeah idk - they just look like strange clouds.

    You said you know exactly what's going on in these videos. Do you mean meteorological? What data sets are you looking at and from what source? If this is truly out of the ordinary, i'm sure there's some links you can provide to at least a few meteorologists talking about it being related to something unnatural.

  • @EnterTheTerrible Yes I mean meteorological. The Data that i am putting together on this comes from a number of different sources.

    Meteorologists know exactly what is going on and they will not talk about it.

    Their job is on the line so they chose to stay silent. Most actually go along with it and the B.S. NWS forecasting system.

  • @jh4dc5s

    What type of data, and which sources specifically? I'm quite interested to see some evidence in the form of data that can explain why the clouds in your two videos are at all related to something man made like HAARP and not known cyclical weather patterns from a natural mechanism.

    It can't be too difficult to find a meteorologist who will speak out about it if your assertion is correct. There's lots of renegade scientists who advocate things far outside mainstream science.

  • @EnterTheTerrible Wind Speed, Atmospheric Moisture Content, in relation to satellite and radar images of man made aerosol clouds (aka Chemtrails) diverting jet streams. That type of data, much more also.

  • @jh4dc5s

    Chemtrails? lol. Okay just shoot me the link to your blog and i'll catch these data sets and sources as they become available. Hopefully they're as indicative as you're making them seem. Hopefully we can take it right to the authorities and start a class action lawsuit against some of these corporations involved. I appreciate the time in answering my questions and i'm really looking forward to these data sets.

  • @EnterTheTerrible "mainstream science" is an oxymoron like "diet lard" or "government intelligence". Anyone that says "the science is settled" about ANYTHING is simply lazy or afraid of debating. You think there's no weather modification? The United Nations banned weather manipulation IN WARFARE. Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980.

  • @EnterTheTerrible If there's no such thing as weather manipulation, why bother to sign it into law? In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration regulates weather control projects, under authority of Public Law 205 of the 92nd Congress.

    Did you pay attention to China during the olympics? They GUARANTEED there would be no rain. EVERY day for some time prior to olympics the red army would shoot canisters into the sky at the clouds. Modification. Now they're paying for it.

  • @EnterTheTerrible Regarding your debate with jh4dc5s, consider the source. Check out his list of favorite videos and what he's written about 911 being an inside job. I wouldn't be surprised if he's also a moon landing denier. Bottom line, he's not worth your time.

  • @jh4dc5s

    Yeah I understand physics a bit, not completely. I am taking it in College at the moment. I'm also not saying it's not possible that HAARP is doing those things, just that there's no definitve, direct evidence of it. if there was there would be a lot more pressure and criticism from the civilian population - which there isn't. As far as I know it's still operational and hasn't been shut down, which you'd expect if what you claim was provable.

  • @jh4dc5s The page cannot be found

    The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.

    That's what comes up when I try to find the document you posted the link for.

  • Amazing. The video's only 21 seconds. How long did it take in real time?

  • @minusdot Doh. 3 hours - the clue's in the title! ;-)

  • Sun was listening to skrillex and that was the bass. It explains everything

  • @bytebull yea, it's fake.

  • I think that was vegetas' big bang attack...

  • The sun Just took a giant Dumb wow IT must be constapaded

  • is ti real?! 

  • fake and gay. 

  • so that is a prediction of Ipod touch and iphone 5g are coming?

  • i think that  sun farted!

  • it is like my sexual member when I do the amazing brazilian shot!

  • God I love your creation so much....

  • @Izenith1 till it kills you.

  • Who farted? The sun farted!!

  • EPIC

  • Was that a real solar explosion or a movie as noted by the author?

  • WOW! That is huge!

  • Wow, the scale of that burst is enormous!

  • Wow! That solar explosion was enormous! Bet we'll definitely be feeling the after-effects of THAT one here on earth in some pretty profound ways. Fasten your seat belts and hang onto your hats ... we're in for an interesting ride!

  • I keep saying I should get a generator.

  • Esto es una clara eyección de masa coronaria!

  • que significa esto? increíble imágen

  • The sun just exploded.

  • mmmm ya se porque hace tanta calor hoy....

  • anyonw knows how many times the size of the earth was that blast?

  • @jjfremen It measured the energy of approximately 378 trillion burritos.

  • @nonplayerzealot4 HAHAHA

  • @jjfremen i have red ten times

  • @jjfremen the sun is about a million times bigger than earth, so it's gotta be in the tens of thousands (because it was on the surface) times bigger than Earth I figure, but probably WAY off.

  • Noticed at the onset of the eruption a diffraction grating. Does anyone know where that banded wave pattern is created?

  • Comment removed

  • This is the most beautiful sunflare I have ever seen!

  • sun god got angry and farted out loud

  • M-Class!

  • @Soartwo1980 CME

  • @seapeddler The only correct thing you said is that the sun can't go supernova. Which has nothing to do with electricity, and everything to do with the mass and type of star. When the sun dies, it will be as a red giant and eventually a small nebula, not a supernova. I have no idea what the electricity stuff you're talking about is, but it's certainly not science.

  • @cecilkorik Don't listen to trolls. That's my advice.

  • @cecilkorik I think hes putting it in layman's terms but is infact talking about magnetic fields maybe i dunno.

  • oh la la!

  • It is simple to explain how our Sun is dependent on the galactic core for energy.

    But, these outbursts are not really of the Sun, but the Sun is conducting away excess electrical current via. the conduit of the Orion galactic arm. It appears that supernovas are in fact electrical overloads. What is the total electrical capacity of a star before it goes supernova? The Sun shares its' electricity with Jupiter and the other solar system bodies. It can't go supernova, right?

  • WOW Planet size debris from blast slamming back into the sun! WOW!

  • Get ready for a G3 geomagnetic storm tomorrow...wow! Don't fly next couple days...earthquakes too!

  • Epic!!!

  • Based on the title it looks like about a 3-hr period

  • Holy cow! Is this flare shown in real time? If so the speed of that flare was simply astonishing.

  • Coolio

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more