Until I heard this, I often wondered why they called Rhapsody in Blue jazz, Even the 1927 recording was refined compared to this version. By 1942 it had become a standard. I don't believe the raw energy captured here or the innovation allowed by Whiteman and Gershwin here have been reproduced.
@carliarago I'm just bustin' chops; I know it's the original, acoustic version and that you're playing it on a Victrola; it actually sounds pretty good, considering.
Sorry to that I gave you the opposite impression and also let's thank the poster for putting this up.
I like the original version because it has a very spontaneous quality about it; I have read that the origianal performance was indeed spontaneous and improvised, with the band trying to follow Gershwin's exquisite play. All other versions have sought to capture the same quality and have fallen short, in my humble opinion.
The really neat part of the story about this song, was that Gershwin, didn't write the solos... he just named the soloist, and left the music up to the musician.
Is this a recording of the actual February 12, 1924 concert at Aeolian Hall in New York that was broadcast on the radio? If not, when was this recorded?
@clszm There is so much that is great about this performance - and not just because it is the original. From Ross Gorman's laughing clarinet, to Gershwin's uncanny rhythm. Listen carefully to Gershwin's playing and you'll find it has more in common with the great pianists of the past such as Hofmann and Rachmaninoff than more modern pianists - including Bernstein. There is beautiful tone, a natural rubato, even distribution of the hands - and of course a wonderful sense of rhythm.
@ignaz1882 the most notable and impressive thing about Gershwin's pianism in this recording is his sparing use of the pedal. Gershwin in general is meant to be played pretty dry, and here you have it with Gershwin himself showing us exactly how to do it
Until I heard this, I often wondered why they called Rhapsody in Blue jazz, Even the 1927 recording was refined compared to this version. By 1942 it had become a standard. I don't believe the raw energy captured here or the innovation allowed by Whiteman and Gershwin here have been reproduced.
swinedance 3 days ago
Rhapsody in Blue is the greatest compositon ever,or that ever will be.I doubt if it gets outdone.
dlsofsetx 1 week ago
It feels like watching a very old cartoon. Rhapsody in Blue is one of my favourite pieces of music. Thanks for the upload!
babehuiy 1 month ago
@babehuiy It's my absolute favorite!IMHO,the greatset composition ever.
dlsofsetx 1 week ago
Is this Gershwin with Paul Whiteman Orchestra?
mikemcgee 2 months ago
nice.lovin it
wiruserror 4 months ago
@carliarago I'm just bustin' chops; I know it's the original, acoustic version and that you're playing it on a Victrola; it actually sounds pretty good, considering.
Sorry to that I gave you the opposite impression and also let's thank the poster for putting this up.
SatchmoSings 6 months ago
Music history! Thanks for posting this for our easy listening access.
Lockbar 10 months ago
awesome.
mediawest 11 months ago
I like the original version because it has a very spontaneous quality about it; I have read that the origianal performance was indeed spontaneous and improvised, with the band trying to follow Gershwin's exquisite play. All other versions have sought to capture the same quality and have fallen short, in my humble opinion.
chev6art 1 year ago 9
I just love the true clarinet gliss in the intro.
reuben2011 1 year ago
haha it sounds as if its a pack of ducks singing it! For 1924 it's not terrible I guess though...
larie2 1 year ago
This sounds as if it were played with a tin can; better check your record player!
SatchmoSings 1 year ago
The really neat part of the story about this song, was that Gershwin, didn't write the solos... he just named the soloist, and left the music up to the musician.
louswire 1 year ago
Good song even 86 years it still famous
TheMoviefan1996 1 year ago 3
Kudos to you for posting the Original 1924 Recording. I've always preferred it over the more polished 1927 Orthophonic Version. Thanks again!
ASACurator 1 year ago
Yes, excellent . . . the very best - you can almost imagine you're in 20's New York . . .
MrBazza86 1 year ago
This original version is so jazzy & sounds cutting edge.
atyg1967 1 year ago
Is this a recording of the actual February 12, 1924 concert at Aeolian Hall in New York that was broadcast on the radio? If not, when was this recorded?
duckman531 1 year ago
@duckman531 No. It was recorded a few months later I believe.
Animainiac85 1 year ago
of all performances this is the one I would liked to have witnessed. The genius, pure in the raw, not polished.
jwinansa 2 years ago
Thanks... Though I must say I like Leonard Bernstein's rendition better. This is the original, however, so nothing can put it down.
clszm 2 years ago
@clszm There is so much that is great about this performance - and not just because it is the original. From Ross Gorman's laughing clarinet, to Gershwin's uncanny rhythm. Listen carefully to Gershwin's playing and you'll find it has more in common with the great pianists of the past such as Hofmann and Rachmaninoff than more modern pianists - including Bernstein. There is beautiful tone, a natural rubato, even distribution of the hands - and of course a wonderful sense of rhythm.
ignaz1882 4 months ago
@ignaz1882 the most notable and impressive thing about Gershwin's pianism in this recording is his sparing use of the pedal. Gershwin in general is meant to be played pretty dry, and here you have it with Gershwin himself showing us exactly how to do it
retrogamerdave 2 months ago 2
Nice.
InkRaven 2 years ago