emanGP1, He is American so you have to excuse him. Trust me, most Americans do not know anything about any country beyond their own, and many do not know anything even about their own.
Im not with this racist woman but you are the dumbest retard i have ever met. In great britan (and your own country too) DO have freedom of speech, but there is this thing in most contitutions that says that you can say whatever you want just as long as it isnt offensive to an ethnic group, race, culture or society. (i know this is alot for you to handle but stay with me) In short i hope you stop making videos because you are a complete dipshit.
@emanGP1 "In great britan (and your own country too) DO have freedom of speech, but there is this thing in most contitutions that says that you can say whatever you want just as long as it isnt offensive to an ethnic group, race, culture or society."
I don't think it's too long before parents can have their baby's genes artificially designed/altered to determine skin colour, hair type, immunity to certain diseases, prior to giving birth. So, perhaps white supremacists need not worry too much about 'whites' becoming extinct. Two black parents can potentially give birth to a white child. I read about this in a science magazine sometime back.
I don't buy the idea that genetically there are more differences among one group of people than people of different groups. Sorry, but genetically, Europeans are clustered together and are more similar to each other than they are to some Africans. This, of course, excludes Nort Africa, who are principally European type anyway.
I agree Europe should, in principle, remain mostly white as it is the natural of home European people, but the US is a different story. I think people should be able to migrate there from all over the world because that's what has been happening for the last 2 centuries. And race mixing in America is not a big deal because the idea there is to melt into a pot. So, perhaps the non-whites in Europe should be allowed to migrate to the US and make it their new home.
The entire Eurasian region from the outskirts of Western Europe to the West to the Indian Subcontinent to the East is a great mix of different cultures because empires have criss-crossed this region for thousands of years.
Just typical..... this guy appears to be reinforcing the American stereotype nicely :/ Obviously knows very little about Britain and the British way of life.
My family was forced out of Britain by immigration, my lineage goes back to the tenth century. The area we lived in became so dangerous due to Arab and African immigration inflating crime rates that my parents no longer felt safe in the country as a whole. White people in Britain are simply being replaced, because the more immigrants enter and area, the more whites who have the power to do so, leave.
Refugees from foreign countries made my family fucking refugees. Whites are second class in UK.
Of course there's free speech in the UK. Who told of there wasn't? But free speech to too much extreme can be a bad thing. Ifi go around shouting out the 'nigger', sooner or later Ii am going to be hospitalised or even killed. And frankly, I would deserve to be. You cannot preach hate in the name of free speech.
The woman was not arrested for disagreeing with immigrants, she was arrested for racist behaviour. Which before you yanks play the "Freedom of speach" card, we don't have such a thing over here. We're a monarchy, we're all subjects to the Queen if we like it or not.
@LossGaming Were not realy subjects of the Queen. She just a figure head. Having her is a act of nationalism because she is a main part of our culture. She makes her money from her owning lots of land which is part of the agreement Geroge III made with the government. And we do have freedom of speach. E.g we can vote the BMP if we wish.
@LossGaming You can abuse the Queen. I live in Scotland and people say it every time she is mentioned (Even when she is present). She is Queen in name only. She has 0 powers. She is is there for serimonial purposes in parliment. She gets the title because of the agreement with Geroge III that allows the Government to use her land in return for her keeping the title and a sum of money. Which the Government makes 160m out of and gives 40m to the Queen.
I mean really. the UK didnt invade the rest of europe the axis did. I think the concept is called "total war" and it is the only kind that wins and lasts, if you knew history youwuold know that. you cry baby liberal limp turd. the UK had every right to bomb any friggen city in Germany they wanted to you weenie. so did the US.
you are a fool and she had every right to say what she said. by the time dresdan was bombed both sides were guilty of "not playing fair" I am sure there were reasons for dresdan that will be lost to history besides the given ones. We werent alive then we cant say what her grafather was thinking but i am sure the battle of britian was on his mind. or maybe the children he had to send to the countryside or to america to the germans wouldnt bomb them in their house one night BEFORE DRESDAN asshat.
@howler505 There was more children died in dresden on that one day then the rest of the ww2 (including the holocast) and ww1. They maximised deaths by having a constant bombing raid so they couldnt escape. UK was the first to bomb civilian areas and Hitler waited 3 weeks for churchill to stop, Which he didnt so Hitler use the old tactic of fire vs fire. We were both guilty of it yet only Germany got punished for it. Which isnt fair.
Immigration is not genocide, intermarrying is not genocide. If you are to fucking stupid to see the diference between a minor demographic trend brought about by the end of insitutionalized racism and a gas chamber, your brain is clearly defective or you beleive in repugnant ideologies that the sooner they are permianntly relegated along with the idea of the Flat Earth or the Five Humours in "The Big Book of False Nonsense Unelightend Man Once Believed in In", the better.
My ancestors harmed no one- no slaves or genocide, and in fact since the 1700s were keen on neighborly acceptance. This goes for both sides of my heritage, the white and the Lenape sides.
You know what else? That doesn't matter. No white American today has ever owned slaves, and no race of any kind has a right to demand "payback" for grievances that have no surviving parties left. I have been oppressed, and I only blame those who might be directly responsible, because it's *logical*.
You don’t see such sensitivity training being forced upon anyone in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, or South America. You don’t hear China, Japan, or Israel being lectured to swing open their doors to foreigners. Almost exclusively, multiculturalism is a psychological marketing program designed for majority-white countries. Why is that?
@k0nslify well at least the gasing part was well organised not the mass shootings. how do you measure who went through more shit? i don't know if it is measurable.
@k0nslify it wans't less than what other groups have experienced. the nazis killed 12-14 million civilians from the USSR, 5 millions from poland (jews included in those numbers), most other european countries lost hundreds of thousands of citizens. japan killed 7-16 million chinese citizens. and of course the axis lost millions of civilians too. the holocaust is not the first or the last genocide in history what was unique about it is that it was an industrial genocide and well organized.
where did he get the bullshit that 70% of london is not white? 69% of the population is white, he got confused. anyway if most british people want britian to stay british i think they should have the right to preserve their ethnicity and heritage and not have their nation stolen from them.
It's good not to have free speech then nobody can be discriminate and hurt full as it is illegal in the uk. Plus I don't agree with what she said but I dont like the fact of England not being White anymore. Its just not British.
@youmakemeracist Okay, I give up. You obviously don't know how to read or how to understand what you read. I did not call you anything you moron. I was trying to explain to you that the other poster and myself also agree to an extent with you. Get it? We were on your side. After seeing how dense you are I don't think you really know what you believe in yourself.
A diversed population is easier to control. Because tensions from the lower class will be kept inside that class and fought between the different ethnicities. An easy way to take the rights away from the people, step by step, as we can see, once we turn away from the TV-God.
And thank you very much for describing the bombing of Dresden as a genocidal policy. In Germany we blame ourselves for that mass murder. If that isn't suicidal! Laws forbid to even call this a Holocaust (=Death by flames).
It's genocide if you kill them off dumbass. That is a good fucking reason to speak out against it? Do you think the british authorities go around, the ethnically british? No, of course they don't. Cultures develop. Get the fuck over it. So what if it's not a white country anymore?
I AM WHITE I AM PROUD .... I HAVE HISTORY.... I WILL BE PROUD OF MY CULTURE..... I WILL STAND UP FOR MYSELF!!! AS YOU CAN SEE NOW HOW MUCH SHIT IS TALKED TO WHITES " JUST FOR STICKING UP FOR THEMSELVES" WE ARE CALLED RACIST, BIGOTS, REDNECK, BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA GET THE FUCK OUT.... LOVE A COMBAT INFANTRYMAN!!
@youmakemearacist Calm down. She was actually saying the opposite and sticking up for illiterate people like you. Learn how to read before you fly off your handle. People that claim to be against racism are just racists against whites or any other race that wants to survive.
@ANGELSRAGE77 I am a racist, do u think I give a fuck? I hate gangs, druggies, junkies, thieves, punks, and lames fucks who think they run shit, while still sucking on moms tit!! If U label me a racist that's fine I don't give two shits what your armchair commander ass says!! Emma is a fucking hero, she is pissed off about the fucking London riots and telling everyone to their fucking face, instead of being cowards like the ones on here talking shit!! I have pride for my race not exploitation!
good video friend you are right but what you have to understand is that the white people are moving out of london ,that is why some not all parts of london are ethnic,most of the uk is white about 70% .
the woman is poor and uneducated if she does not like the part of london she lives in she should move essex or cornwall , good video fair and to the point............
I AM WHITE I AM PROUD .... I HAVE HISTORY.... I WILL BE PROUD OF MY CULTURE..... I WILL STAND UP FOR MYSELF!!! AS YOU CAN SEE NOW HOW MUCH SHIT IS TALKED TO WHITES " JUST FOR STICKING UP FOR THEMSELVES" WE ARE CALLED RACIST, BIGOTS, REDNECK, BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA GET THE FUCK OUT.... LOVE A COMBAT INFANTRYMAN!!
@youmakemeracist That woman did not stand up for her race, she didn't exactly say racist things either. She just ranted and said stupid things, if you want to stand up for your race would you really do it the way she did? If so then you're not helping your cause since you wouldn't want anyone talking like this to you.
@NellaN1337 w.t.f. are you talking about payback time??? your a fucking idiot!! i DIDN'T DO SHIT TO NO MOTHER FUCKING MAN B4 ME.... ALL THAT SHIT BACK IN THE DAY IS HISTORY!!! WHY SHOULD I BE PUNISHED FOR SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED BACK THEN IF SO BITCH GIVE ME MY $ FOR THE ROMANS ATTACKING GERMANY!!! LAME!!
The Government has reported that WE HAVE OVER TWO MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN THIS COUNTRY. These illegals need to be tracked down and deported as a matter of urgency. The current figure of deportations is only 50,000 annually and this needs to be increased urgently. We MUST put our own people first as these parasitic illegals are sucking our welfare health and education system dry to the detriment of our own people.
London is considered by many nowadays as no longer being a place for English people, nevermind the supposed capital of the country. England is a prime example of what happens to a nation when PC leftists call the shots.
Of course it wouldn't be considered genocide if Lagos (capital of Nigeria is now Abuja, though) was 80% white or whatever. In fact here in South Africa we get your black equivalents constantly bitching about whites trying to wipe them out due to white people emigrating back to South Africa. You're stupid and they're stupid.
Are you purposely trying to look stupid, or do you really believe 70% of London is not white? Statistically London is 70% white.
It's also important to remember that England invented free speech, being one of the oldest democracies in the world. Now while there were a lot of minorities on that tram, there was no reason to start swearing at them. People can voice their opinions without being abusive.
There is a line between being anti-immigration and just racist.
@graemeoliver84 The Red Indians didn't like it and the White Europeans don't like it either. Also, dominated is the wrong word; invaded or intruded are more appropriate.
I, however, find it rather perplexing to hear the logic of liberals. "You did it to someone, therefore you can't complain when it's done to you!" People should want the survival of White Europeans -- we're actually an accomplished people.
@return135 sir u suck. What that women did was racist. She wasnt defending anything, she was just spewing hatred from her mouth and no white europeans aren't any more accomplished than any other race in this world. So quit trying to act like ur race is better than the rest of us.
@cj31501 Quit trying to pretend like your race is as accomplished as ours. When you invent the computer, airplane, automobile, electricity, telephone, internet, land someone on the moon, pioneer medical breakthroughs, create mathematics and physics as we know it, create philosophical concepts such as logic, build nations around the world and much more, then you can say you're comparable. No other race can compare, let's be honest.
@return135 yea and slaughtered many other races of ppl to get there. Most the things ur race "created" is just a pun off what other races already did. This my race is better than yours crap is what i ruining this world. We are all human and we are all equals.
This pre-supposes that the "holocaust" of the Jews also was correct. Yet, you hear no other people, moaning in louder voice about this supposed extermination...than the Jews.
What happened to the Jews in WWII was a damn fair less than what other ethnic-groups experienced in the same period. People forget that.
@return135 They don't care about us. When we are the minorities they are going to kill us all. They are not going to give us reservations like we do and they are not going to give us tax player dollars like we do for the Natives. They are just going to kill men women and children and re-wright the history books. The jews will rule over them.
@return135 the ironic thing is the white race is the only race ever thats volunteered and encouraged others to wipe it out. Perhaps not the average white person but those in power certainly have.
It doesn't seem the "White Europeans" really cared what the "Red Indians" did or didn't like judging by what they did to the Indians. But do tell how nonwhite people immigrating to Europe legally is akin to the European genocide on the Natives of the Americas while white people migrating to Africa, Latin America and Asia is just fine and is somehow not genocide? Do tell.
@A86 . immigration is only legal because elites in Europe betrayed their own people. nobody's fool enough to let that many people come without thinking. it's the same thing as in America just a little bit more vicious : a substitution genocide. europeans are still lobotomized for the moment but patriotism is coming back everywhere in Europe. Euopeans are waking up and they'll fight to keep their homeland (over 2000 years old). there isnt any people in history that let die himself this way.
Genocide is when the population is actively being killed and exterminated en masse or not being allowed to reproduce, or being starved off. What official organization lists any European country as experiencing that right now? None. Tell me, is Westerners being allowed to immigrate to Japan, China and S. Korea a "genocide"? It is "genocide" for them to be allowed to go to S. Africa or Zimbabwe or the Caribbean?
@A86 genocide doesn't obviously mean mass murder with violence. check this wiki/Genocide_definitions.(lots of them agree with me) intent to destroy ,anti nations is enough and the result is the same. I wouldnt trust any of these official organizations since theyre against nations and systematically controled by countries governments . even with the common brainwashing and propaganda for multiculturalism its obvious. its written in black and white on the parliamentary assembly. they support it
@A86 youre pretending not understanding for Asia ? if they have a job, I guess westerners can go to Asia. and same the other way with Asians of course. asian countries you talked about dont have any immigration. according to the anthropologist Levi Strauss "Japan is today the only country which is ethnically and culturally balanced : it absorbes and refuses an lot from outside".I read japanese are very reluctant to immigration even with their low birth rate and old people increase.
@asilaydyingdg - Asian countries, particularly China, S. Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore, tend to let a lot of Westerners immigrate regardless of their income level. As long as you're a Westerner who can speak English they allow you (white or black) to come there. Especially if you come there to get a job as an English teacher. In those cases you don't even have to speak the local langauge. Japan tends to be more selective but toward non-Western immigrants like Filipinos, Chinese & Africans.
@asilaydyingdg - I would say most Asian countries are less selective and discriminatory in their immigration policy towards Westerners than Western countries are to Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants. Asian countries tend to be more discriminatory towards other Asian immigrants and to Middle Eastern and African immigrants. If you're a Western (particularly American) soldier stationed in Asia you can become a citizen fairly easily. Amazingly even North Korea used to allow this.
@A86 and what wrong with that ? theyre just protecting themselves. they've the right to exist. the massive immigration Europe's been bearing for 40 years is from Africa and its not work. (10 millions in France) trust me if the entire african continent was going to China it'd happen very differently. Chinese people havent adhered to stupid universalist humanism values promoted by europeans goverment and dont give a shit about it. this propanganda is done to disarm and weaken people of Europe .
And who is stopping them from existing? No one. It's no one's fault but their own that their birth rate is so low. No one's stopping them from having more kids.
"Europe's been bearing for 40 years is from Africa" As has Africa. As of 2010 Africa's population is over 1% white. So it's okay for Europeans to immigrate to South Africa, Zimbabwe and Kenya but it's okay for Africans to immigrate to Europe? That's mighty hypocritical.
@A86 Im saying it'd be insane for Japanese to let massive immigration come from evevrywhere given that birth rate is low and immigrants (in Africa for instance) have the highest on the planet.its suicidal. anyway the immigration you are talking about for Asia is different from Europe it's only for work. in France 90% of the immigration is for family reunification.
@asilaydyingdg - Please explain how it would be "suicidal". This seems to be the basis of your problem - you have a deep misunderstanding of population and genetics. If their population rate is low enough to be "suicidal", even banning ALL immigration would not do a damn thing to change that. If their birth rate is that low. They'll be gone either way. Unless the immigrants are going to kill them off in some coordinated effort.
Um, no, the Westerners don't go there like on some work visa. Many go and live in Asia for years and years. Some never leave (like expatriates) and some live in Asia long enough to have kids with local women (or men if they are female immigrants).
Immigration from non-European countries tends to be family reunication because they come from countries colonized by France at some point and now all the good jobs are in the colonial parent nation - France.
@A86 western and Asia trade qualified labour works and some people that do want to settle in new culture&country. whereas Europe welcome the third world . difference is colonization is over and 1% white left in South Africa prob be kicked out soon. Europeans had ressources when they came to Africa and it was to do business no to settle. so its wasnt ok. but history'll never be ok in that case. if African never get over colonisations and start building their own continent & keep their ressources
@asilaydyingdg - I love how you assume non-white immigrants are all from the "third world". Some are from places better off than the European countries they go and move to Europe for political reasons. And do explain you mean by "welcome" them and how nonwhite immigrants moving to Europe is different than white immigrants moving to non-white nations.
"colonization is over"
Officially, but the effects have not left. In many of those countieis the West still owns the resources.
@A86 I was talking a lot about France. the great majority of immigrants that come to France is from Africa. family reunion is "welcoming". there is no massive flows of europeans moving to non western countries today. whereas there are 200000 legal non europeans immigrants from Africa moving to France every year.
@asilaydyingdg - In proportion to population size there are large Western immigrations to Brazil, South Africa and Singapore. The biggest immigrations on the planet are from Afghanistan to Pakistan and back and forth between Pakistan and India. Looking at France's black population size that number sounds fishy. Unless it's including temporary immigrants who leave not long (within 2-5 years) after arriving.
@asilaydyingdg - If you start stabbing a person and then stop the damage you've done doesn't magically heal as soon as you stop stabbing.
"Europeans had ressources when they came to Africa and it was to do business"
When? Many today move to Africa permanently, most do not move on work visas since Europe has more jobs than Africa. If you're referring to the colonial age that is certainly not true, Europeans came to Africa to steal resources because Africa had (and still has) more resources.
@asilaydyingdg - "but history'll never be ok in that case"
It's not even really about making things "okay". Humans have forever moved about the planet. This is nothing new. The only thing new is the concept of nation-states. There was only a "France" in the past 250 years or so and only a "South Africa" in the past 150 years. Thinking humans will ever stop emigrating is unrealistic. Africans should have the right to move wherever like everyone has the right to move to Africa.
@A86 all Im saying is Africans'll eventually have to get over colonization if they want to build their countries and coming in Europe as an eternal victim is certainly not the right thing to do." humans always moved nothing new" is not a way to justifiy massive immigration. humans moved in the past but certainly not millions in 30 years. massive immigration like that is pretty new for europeans since war agains muslim in middle-age.
@asilaydyingdg - I agree with you that Africa will have to overcome its colonization problems and will have to stop being the eternal victim. But Europeans with your mindset will have to stop playing eternal victim as well, especially if you're gonna move to other people's countries.
"not millions in 30 years"
Apparently you never heard of the Mongol takeover of the Kievan 'Rus. Or the Christian migration to Jerusalem during and after the Crusades.
@A86 where'd you see europeans're playing victims ? it's the opposite they stand up and show that their people exist.dont know how&where there could big immigrations of Europeans today !? so you're comparing extra european invasion (Kievan'Rus) at the Europe borders &part of european history, religious expeditionary war (not migration lol) to what happens now ?
@A86 well I guess thats a glimpse of the certainly "primitive" for this human rights age but natural and legitime reaction that what will happen if massive immiragtion continue.
@A86 France's been existing for 250 years, haha are you kidding ? as a republic state you mean maybe . but the history of French people and their roots like the other europeans started way before the "state" thats what matters more because thats what makes people exist. same for south Africa : a recentlty state made with different ethnies. im not contesting the right of Africans or anyone to move wherever they want but if you settle your whole family in my house dont expect me not to react
@asilaydyingdg - Yes, that's what I meant. As a republic. South Africa existed long before the 1800s but didn't exist as a modern republic. You can react about people immigrating if you want to, but you don't have the right to stop them as long as they're not breaking the law or hurting people.
Countries that try to restrict immigrants usually do get criticized by the UN. Japan is heavily criticized for its policy by the UN as is Zimbabwe for its policies towards white immigration.
@A86 back in the Middle-Age this would have been different there would have been a real solidarity even "tribal" reactions. the right today is only what is decided by UN.
@asilaydyingdg - I hate to burst your bubble but tribes back then had little problem selling their fellow tribesmen to other tribes as slaves. Eastern Europeans sold other Eastern Europeans as slaves to the Mongol Khaganate all the time. Same with Africans selling each other.
"only what is decided by the UN"
Which people like you have no problem referencing to claim you're under a "genocide", the same organization you complain is unjust or useless. Talk about hypocrisy. *eyeroll*
@A86 yes thats why no people in the world can stop existing without fighting this is survival reactions, unless enslaved. but if someone of your tribe sell your brother thats probably because hes getting some bribe from the enemy and has therefore no dignity. I recognize we are not under a genocide now but it is an potential future UN and other globalist organisations submit our betrayers leaders to open Europe doors. so therefore it's more like a potential substitution genocide
That's not an argument. There is no international right for the "autochthonous" population to be the majority. Otherwise, like I said, Native Americans should have the right to ship out most US citizens. Their birth rate is low enough they'll be a small minority in their own land for the foreseeable future.
@A86 you did understand the whole argument "Im opposed to let immigrants in for the reason of autochtone low birht rate in a way that it can help balance this rate"t Yes there not such international right. But Im not following the international right which is anti nations or any other. yes native Americans should have had the right to ship most US citizen but they were outnumbered and not as strong thats the only law there was. but I'd understand if they were able to ship them out
@asilaydyingdg - Some Europeans (such as yourself) are playing victim by pretending they're somehow being harmed by immigration and using drama queen terms like "genocide" to describe it (which is insulting to any ethnic group that has undergone a REAL genocide, like the Herero or Tutsis or European Jews).
@A86 its unconsciously or not warnings what can happen by the end of the century if immigrations isnt reduced. and I think it's quite understandable : people living in the countryside can be quite surprised when going to the capital and find that there are really few French in Paris or English in London. well actually immiration does harm since 70% people in jail in France are Muslim (Islam is the hidden word for immigration)
@A86 my source is that for ex in major cities like Marseille or even in London, the majority of names given to new born babies are Arabic, African name or Indian names which obviously mean new generation of immigrants not autochtone.its not hard to understand. if you let people come that have a higher birth rate than yourself. its obvious than the population is slowly being replaced. its not a violent genocide in 3 years but takes a few decades and that is enough. same results; a new polulation
@asilaydyingdg - I know in the UK the most common baby name in 2010 was "Muhammad", however, this is because Muslims give boys that name at a high rate as opposed to Europeans who don't use a particular name that often. Never heard of that situation in France but I suspect a similar thing is going on.
"the population is slowly being replaced"
1) This assumes the population with the lower birth rate has one low enough not to maintain any population at all. 2) This assumes the one with the
@asilaydyingdg - higher birth rate will continue on that way indefinitely. Not a realistic assumption. By your "logic" the Middle East should have the world's highest population. In reality Europe has a bigger population than the Middle East.
3) This also ignores a key problem: If the white European birth rate is so low that Europeans will disappear anyway how will keeping others out magically stop this disappearance? In other words - your argument makes no damn sense.
@A86 would have been already here and brought continously like it has been for 30 years. so it would be slowly a replacement then (sort of balance in terms of demography but still replacement) Middle East countries (but not Africa) have less people since less developped and less density too, but bring immigrants and their families and they have everything needed plus their higher birth rate. its true there a lot of steps to lead to that "genocide" but thats why we feel the first tensions .
@asilaydyingdg - It's like saying keeping everyone away from a vanishing man will cause him to stop vanishing. If the European birth rate is so low that it's "suicidal" NOTHING is going to stop Europeans from disappearing unless they have more kids, which they can do whether non-whites are present or not.
If you're arguing that whites in Europe may not be the majority, like I said, there is no legal right to be the majority.
@A86 I think quite a lot of other foreign names were given in the list. being in the list is enough anyway to show that its is high proportion of new babies born so the next generations. you say some true things about growth and birht rate of people. but as I said this phenomenon is something that will happens slowly.beside, the economic system needs people for cheap labour work and consumers too, so it'll make more and immigration come. if the europeans disappear an extra european population
@asilaydyingdg - Yes, but Muslims have a very high rate of naming boys "Muhammad". It's like the name "John" was 1 or 2 generations ago in the US where like every other guy was named "John" or "Michael". I don't think any other signficantly large groups name their kid any particular name as often as Muslims name boys "Muhammad".
Anyways..
"happens slowly"
What does? Multiple ethnic groups with different birth rates live in other countries and none has died out (except during wars).
@asilaydyingdg - And you still glossed over the fact that if the white European birth rate is so low that they're going to die out, keeping others out of Europe will do nothing to stop this. Like my comparison earlier to a vanishing man. What you're saying also assumes that minorities will produce at high rates forever, which is not realistic.
"needs people for cheap labor"
Now that I do have a problem with when it comes to immigration. But the immigrants are as much victims as the natives
@A86 of not being the majority in hometowns,cities even there is not legal right for that. the problem with that international legal right is that it's egalitarianism and universalist (a form of ethnocentrism too) thinking all these laws should rule the world, apply to everybody and that humans are all exchangeable.it forgets people have an identity and want to keep it and making million immigrants from completely differnent place is not helping. it was hard enough between Europeans themselves..
@asilaydyingdg - Uh, what ethnicity is egalitarianism and universalism based around (you accused it of being ehtnocentric). You shouldn't knock universalism since you are demanding it for your own "group". The non-egalitarian thing to do would be to just the Europeans be wiped out. Survival of the fittest. If the non-white people were able to overwhelm the white population that would mean the nonwhites were evolutionarily preferred, using Darwinian logic.
Not all. However, cultural identites are not eternal. You think the cultural identities of European countries today is the same as it was 500 years ago? 1000 years ago? lol Nope. Cultures change and all cultures today are the result of various cultures mixing and changing over time. Great Britain is probably one of the biggest hodgepodge cultures in the world outside of Central Asia.
@A86 I think your interpration of the names isnt entirely true. Muhammed is indeed the most given names by muslims. But it’s not the only foreign name of the list. In Bruxelles the seven most given names are Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine et Hamza. Apart from Adam ( hebrew origin name btw) none of the rest is european. And it’s similar in Marseilles and probably London too. Muslims represent 25% in Marseilles, Rotterdam, 20% in Malmo, 15% in Bruxelles, 10% Paris, Londres, Copenhague.
@asilaydyingdg - Never said it's the only foreign name, just the most common because there are no other foreign cultures in the UK or France where a particular name is as common as it is among Muslims (or those other minorities are not as numerous as Muslims).
@A86 That doesnt even include the other immigrants that arent Muslims. the forecast also says there will be more than 20% of muslims in Europe by 2050. and its already the case in most big cities. Again in France the growth population is entirely due to immigration. Yes it doesnt means it helps Europeans to die of course but just says a large proportion of new generations to come wont be europeans so in the end it’s the same. More immigrants on the continent and less europeans. Even if we where
@asilaydyingdg - "also says there will be more than 20% of muslims in Europe by 2050"
And? South Africa is already 20% non-black (or not fully black). By your logic the black natives should be claiming they're under a genocide since they're only the 80% majority in their entire country (not just the cities).
@asilaydyingdg - "just says a large proportion of new generations to come wont be europeans"
Wow. France being "only" (not like that's a small number) 80% white French in the urban areas by 2050 instead of 99% means Europeans have died out? That's quite a drama queen/king-like mentality.
@A86 dying by the end of century (we’d have found solutions to avoid it hopefully) making people come that obviously are growing faster than us is problematic. Immigrants from Italy, Spain and Poland in France already met difficulties to integrate in France after 1940. Im really sceptical about the integration of millions of people that dont share the same appearance, cultural roots, behaviours and language.
@asilaydyingdg - "sceptical about the integration of millions of people that dont share the same appearance, cultural roots, behaviours and language"
It's been happening since time immemorial. What you call "Spanish" or "French" culture even before significant immigration from outside of Europe is the result of thousands of years of different people mixing. Do you think to be ethnically "French" was in 1900 what it was in 1000 AD? 500 AD? Or is that okay as long as the people are "white"?
@A86 Yes in addition to cheap labour problem, immigrants are as much victims as autochtone for the integration too. That reminds me of the video “my tram experience” where that African woman says to the English woman “we do the work for you” which is wrong. Native dont accept poor working conditions and low wages but immigrants would do anything just to come in a fantasized Europe and big CEOs know it thats why they support massive immigration
@asilaydyingdg - "Im not asking for universalism for my group"
Asking that your culture be granted special status as a protected group, like some kind of rare bird or endangered animal, IS asking for universalist sympathy. A non-universalist or non-egalitarian would just say, "Welp, if the native people can't keep their own population numbers up just let 'em go. Survival of the fittest. They can just go the way of the Native Americans."
@A86 Im not asking for universalism for my group. Its the opposite,Im against that “Same” culture ideology that thends to erase differences and bring back everything ofhumanity as One. The fact that this ideology has been invented by the degenerate society of westerners doesnt make it right at all, and even less to followIn that way universalism is just another form of ethnocentrism.(judging another culture from your own culture).
@asilaydyingdg - According to non-egalitarians it's not natural to protect creatures from extinction....
"that thends to erase differences and bring back everything ofhumanity as One"
There was never a time when the cultures of humanity were as one. Also, if Europeans should have the right to exist outside of Europe, such as the Americas, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, S. Africa, etc. then why should they have special privilege to deny others the same freedom to live abroad?
What ethnicity is it central around? For something to be "ethnocentrist" it has to be biased in favor of a particular ethnicity.
"Egalitarianism and universalism hasnt got any ethnicity" Then by definition it can't be "ethnocentrist". It's like saying someone is "sexist" for not favoring either sex.
@A86 And Im against France involvelment in anything that doesnt harm its interest.
Egalitarianism and universalism hasnt got any ethnicity since the aim of it is to create a sort unique human from al the existing differences not to allow groups exist separately. The non egalitarian treatment you are talking about is already happening since new generations upcoming in Europe arent europeans as a majority.
@asilaydyingdg - "aim of it is to create a sort unique human from"
In other words, you're complaining that egalitarians allow humans the freedom to interact with whomever they'd like...
"not to allow groups exist separately" By this you mean not viewing authoritarian closed-door immigration policies as legitimate or constructive. Your complaint is that egalitarians don't agree with North Korean-type immigration policies (North Korea is notorious for allowing almost no outsiders in).
@A86Same thing in terms of culture, there are new communities living in Europe with their own culture how is that egalitarian for European culture ?the assimilation (unlike multiculturalism anglosaxon) of Spanish took time in France but these people from immigration feel French as much as someone whose ancestors have been in French territory for generations. But this assimilations needed efforts of course like changing your first name and even taking the family name of the person you’d marry
@asilaydyingdg - "how is that egalitarian for European culture ?"
The same way it's egalitarian to allow non-black cultures to exist in Africa and non-Native cultures to exist in the Americas and Canada.
Also, what is "European culture"? There is no singular European culture, and the many cultures of Europe are themselves a mix of different ethnic cultures from the past. Some of them from outside of Europe. Some of the culture of Hungary is from Central Asian culture. Same with Russia.
@asilaydyingdg - Spanish culture is itself a mix of Roman, Visigothic, Celto-Iberian and Moorish culture and has been for over 1,000 years. There's a reason that Spanish music bears a vague resemblance to Middle Eastern and North African music sometimes and why the Spanish language has loanwords from Arabic. Like "Ojala" ("perhaps"), borrowed from Arabic "Allah".
@A86 Survival of the fittest is not the current trend of the evolution since we are not biologically or genetically evolving anymore or very little and slowly. at least it is not what made doing the big jump form animals to humans building civilzations. The increase complexity of human brain as it has developped, allowed to developp in a cultural way. We are able to rule the the different imperatives of survival, natural conditions. For instance we cure the diseases due to genetic mutations.
@asilaydyingdg - "since we are not biologically or genetically evolving anymore"
Evolution doesn't stop. Humans are still evolving today, and according to some scientists more rapidly than we previously had been for quite some time. It's doubtful that humans 40,000 years from now (if we don't kill each other first) will look like exactly like humans look today.
"differences between continents" Genetically there are more differences between humans within continents than between.
@A86 They are of course differences in terms of how advanced are civilizations ,differences between continents but it is possible to teach it to non europeans coming in Europe how to rule it when they are young. My point is“fittest survival” does not make any sense to me since we are not running in woods anymore we have passed this stage.
@A86 I wonder how you explain people in the world can exist without any identity. Cultural identity arent eternal of course it builds over time like layers upon each other and that is what makes a civilization.Cultural identity in Europe isnt certainly the same as it was 500 years ago or before due to scientific progress, industrial revolution and intra invasions between europeans.But the roots are still the same and very present I think : celtic, greek-latin, germanic and christian influences
"it builds over time like layers upon each other" Sometimes. Some populations gradually (or rapidly) phase out their old cultures and adopt a new or foreign one. Do you think Sudanese culture is today what it was 1,500 years ago? Nope. Today Sudanese culture is Arab-like now opposed to what it was in ancient times (Nubian times). French culture is much more Germanic today than its original Celtic culture.
@asilaydyingdg - The ancient Gaulic culture of what's today France (Gaul) was rapidly Romanized by Roman presence and later largely displaced by the Germanic culture of the Franks, Normans and Teutons. The Celtic Gaul culture is largely gone today and only traces remain in modern French culture. Little is left of the language anymore in the modern French language which is mostly Latin-based with Germanic Frankish influence.
@A86 For France there havent been any massive immigrations since the viking invasions (around 800) until today so the population until late 1940 and 30 years ago has been stable and balanced. That is why the massive immigration from outside Europe today is new and worrying. And it is similar for the rest of Europe too
@asilaydyingdg - "Great Britain today multicultiralism is not what I call an identity and neither is the consumerist, mercantilist"
Gotta agree with you on that (and your complaints about how immigration policy exploits low-income immigrants and puts native workers out of a job in European countries). This is the result of globalist Neoliberal and Neoconservative post-industrial capitalism and its materialistic values.
@A86 Great Britain today multicultiralism is not what I call an identity and neither is the consumerist, mercantilist anglo-saxon that spread over ther world. At least we see that the effects are ending with the crisis. and I bet the communities living there feel more belonging to their parents origin than feel British.thats what Muslims say.. For me it’s not part of the european civilization
@asilaydyingdg - "anglo-saxon that spread over ther world"
Speaking of, that's another example of a culture that exists by displacement. British culture today is much more Anglo-Saxon than it was 1,000 years ago. The culture of the Anglo-Saxon invaders who came to represent the majority in England almost completely wiped out the aboriginal Stonehenge culture (which was non-Indo-European) and the Celtic Brythonic culture. The English language is much more Latin-Germanic than Celtic today.
@asilaydyingdg - "well actually immiration does harm since 70% people in jail in France are Muslim"
The French gov't doesn't keep demographics on inmates. This figure was estimated by "Muslim leaders". No telling how accurate this is, it could just as easily be a very inflated figure to get more radical Muslims riled up and accuse the French gov't of targeting Muslims. Supposedly some of them are illegals and some are criminals from impoverished neighborhoods.
By that logic being around any humans should be considered hazardous. The average white French citizen is more likely to be victimized by another white French person.
"but it is an potential future UN" There's going to be a systematic wiping out of white Europeans? By whom? Who is going to prevent them from living or execute them in mass numbers?
@A86Im afraid it's not only in France that Africans and Arabs have a bad reputation. you are saying that since there are still more French native that Arabs, the average of attacks on French native is done by other French native but its wrong in reality most attacks are done by immigrants. I told you 70% people in jail are from immigration. it won't happen like a massive wiping
@A86 but if immigration continues like it does we may reach a point not now but by the end of century where autochtone are barely the majority. you think autochtone doesnt have to be a majority but in reality it doesnt work like that, making millions of people come is cool but you have integrate them. well in France its becoming like in UK French native leave suburbs wheres there are in minority beacause they dont feel at
@A86 and if you let that continue immigrants'll ask their own laws like they already do in UK for sharia, then they'll ask to have independant zone. tell me why should I accept that some communities live in my country like that ? dont answer the internanationa law says its ok I know they support it. and btw we already reached a point where in big cities autochtone arent majority anymore. I take the exemple of London or in Sweden or Norway (with cities like Malmo) and they didint colonize anyone
@asilaydyingdg - "Chinese people havent adhered to stupid universalist humanism values"
According to whom? The Chinese government is still partially socialistic and adheres, at least officially, to egalitarianism. If you think egalitarianism and universalism is so "stupid" then you should have no problem with people like President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. He doesn't believe in universalism either and believes in limiting the non-black popuation of Zimbabwe and Africa.
@A86 its communism not socialism. so in many ways similar to Russia which is very nationalistic too. wanting an egalitarist society for your people is not wanting to adapt your recipe principles to the rest of the world. western universilism tries to make believe that everybody is exchangeable to another (this suits very well captalism which features blig flows of goods, capitals and humans) as long as there's the human rights religion but I dont think populations can be moved this way.
@asilaydyingdg - What on Earth are you talking about? What does communism or sociailsm have to do with the right to live where you want to live? If anything the policies you promote are more like the Soviet Union - the Soviet Union heavily restricted who could enter the country. So did Red China. That sounds like a lot like you on that issue.
"western univeralism"
Psst, Western nations aren't the only ones who don't heavily restrict the number of immigrants.
@asilaydyingdg - Also, the "right to live" argument you used earlier was fallacious. You would have to prove that immigrant will somehow cause the native population to die off. If by "right to live" you mean 'right to be the majority population" no such international law or right exists. The native population doesn't have the right to be the majority. If it did Native Americans would have the right to forcibly remove all or most non-Amerindian Americans, including the white American majority.
@A86 it's not a genocide in the African countries since Africans autochtone are not getting a minority in their homeland. I disagree with the colonies and the conflicts they made but colons who went there were bourgeois middle class and rich industrialist not the people of Europe and it was clearly to do business. Europe ruins itself anyway with the colonies. the argument saying you did it so dont complain when its done to you is childish. not even comparable. how about scandinavian colonies ?!
@asilaydyingdg - Uh, neither are Europeans. There isn't one European nation on the planet where the local main European ethnicity is the minority. The UK, one of the European nations with the highest nonwhite minority population, is still over 90% white and 85% "white British". South Africa's population is only about 80% black (not counting "Coloreds") - it's more non-black than Britain is non-white.
And other people outbreeding the natives is NOT genocide.
@asilaydyingdg - A genocide would be if the government or some institutional body (like a military) is actively not allowing white Britons to reproduce or is sterilizing them or starving them off.
"the argument saying you did it so dont complain when its done to you is childish"
This has been flagged as spam show
emanGP1, He is American so you have to excuse him. Trust me, most Americans do not know anything about any country beyond their own, and many do not know anything even about their own.
riggerize 1 day ago
Im not with this racist woman but you are the dumbest retard i have ever met. In great britan (and your own country too) DO have freedom of speech, but there is this thing in most contitutions that says that you can say whatever you want just as long as it isnt offensive to an ethnic group, race, culture or society. (i know this is alot for you to handle but stay with me) In short i hope you stop making videos because you are a complete dipshit.
emanGP1 1 day ago
Comment removed
molimhvalaizvoli 3 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@emanGP1 "In great britan (and your own country too) DO have freedom of speech, but there is this thing in most contitutions that says that you can say whatever you want just as long as it isnt offensive to an ethnic group, race, culture or society."
War is peace
Ignorance is strength
Freedom of speech are hate speech laws
molimhvalaizvoli 3 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't think it's too long before parents can have their baby's genes artificially designed/altered to determine skin colour, hair type, immunity to certain diseases, prior to giving birth. So, perhaps white supremacists need not worry too much about 'whites' becoming extinct. Two black parents can potentially give birth to a white child. I read about this in a science magazine sometime back.
riggerize 3 days ago
It also excludes Europeans that have settled in Africa in relatively recent times like white Afrikaaners.
riggerize 3 days ago
I don't buy the idea that genetically there are more differences among one group of people than people of different groups. Sorry, but genetically, Europeans are clustered together and are more similar to each other than they are to some Africans. This, of course, excludes Nort Africa, who are principally European type anyway.
riggerize 3 days ago
I agree Europe should, in principle, remain mostly white as it is the natural of home European people, but the US is a different story. I think people should be able to migrate there from all over the world because that's what has been happening for the last 2 centuries. And race mixing in America is not a big deal because the idea there is to melt into a pot. So, perhaps the non-whites in Europe should be allowed to migrate to the US and make it their new home.
riggerize 3 days ago
The entire Eurasian region from the outskirts of Western Europe to the West to the Indian Subcontinent to the East is a great mix of different cultures because empires have criss-crossed this region for thousands of years.
riggerize 4 days ago
No one is forcing whites to have children with non-whites . Stop the racism.
riggerize 4 days ago
Just typical..... this guy appears to be reinforcing the American stereotype nicely :/ Obviously knows very little about Britain and the British way of life.
tgharrison1992 4 days ago
My family was forced out of Britain by immigration, my lineage goes back to the tenth century. The area we lived in became so dangerous due to Arab and African immigration inflating crime rates that my parents no longer felt safe in the country as a whole. White people in Britain are simply being replaced, because the more immigrants enter and area, the more whites who have the power to do so, leave.
Refugees from foreign countries made my family fucking refugees. Whites are second class in UK.
AkamuSlayer 6 days ago
He's like Pat Condell, but without the eloquence or the persuasiveness.
rockyqw12 1 week ago
Of course there's free speech in the UK. Who told of there wasn't? But free speech to too much extreme can be a bad thing. Ifi go around shouting out the 'nigger', sooner or later Ii am going to be hospitalised or even killed. And frankly, I would deserve to be. You cannot preach hate in the name of free speech.
riggerize 1 week ago
The woman was not arrested for disagreeing with immigrants, she was arrested for racist behaviour. Which before you yanks play the "Freedom of speach" card, we don't have such a thing over here. We're a monarchy, we're all subjects to the Queen if we like it or not.
LossGaming 1 week ago
@LossGaming Were not realy subjects of the Queen. She just a figure head. Having her is a act of nationalism because she is a main part of our culture. She makes her money from her owning lots of land which is part of the agreement Geroge III made with the government. And we do have freedom of speach. E.g we can vote the BMP if we wish.
ochick1 1 week ago
@ochick1 We ARE Subjects to the Queen, thats how a Monarchy works.
We're a Monarchy, a democratic one at that
Deface a pound coin, you'll be thrown into jail if you're caught.
Hunt swan, you'll be arrested aswell.
Freedom of speach comes under the declaration of independance, which is American.
however, we are subject to things very simliar to freedom of speech, but limited.
For example if I were outside Buckingham palace claiming the queens a bitch, i'd be approached by men in suits
LossGaming 1 week ago
@LossGaming You can abuse the Queen. I live in Scotland and people say it every time she is mentioned (Even when she is present). She is Queen in name only. She has 0 powers. She is is there for serimonial purposes in parliment. She gets the title because of the agreement with Geroge III that allows the Government to use her land in return for her keeping the title and a sum of money. Which the Government makes 160m out of and gives 40m to the Queen.
ochick1 1 week ago
@ochick1 Laws are written by the House of Commons, then pasted onto the House of Lords, then sent onto the queen for signature.
She does have powers if she doesn't sign the laws, they don't get passed.
Let's not forget, when an PC (In Britian) signs up, (s)he has to swear alliegance to the Queen.
LossGaming 1 week ago
I mean really. the UK didnt invade the rest of europe the axis did. I think the concept is called "total war" and it is the only kind that wins and lasts, if you knew history youwuold know that. you cry baby liberal limp turd. the UK had every right to bomb any friggen city in Germany they wanted to you weenie. so did the US.
howler505 1 week ago
you are a fool and she had every right to say what she said. by the time dresdan was bombed both sides were guilty of "not playing fair" I am sure there were reasons for dresdan that will be lost to history besides the given ones. We werent alive then we cant say what her grafather was thinking but i am sure the battle of britian was on his mind. or maybe the children he had to send to the countryside or to america to the germans wouldnt bomb them in their house one night BEFORE DRESDAN asshat.
howler505 1 week ago
@howler505 There was more children died in dresden on that one day then the rest of the ww2 (including the holocast) and ww1. They maximised deaths by having a constant bombing raid so they couldnt escape. UK was the first to bomb civilian areas and Hitler waited 3 weeks for churchill to stop, Which he didnt so Hitler use the old tactic of fire vs fire. We were both guilty of it yet only Germany got punished for it. Which isnt fair.
ochick1 1 week ago
I don't agree with her views but I don't think she should have been arrested.
jcvc2011 1 week ago
Immigration is not genocide, intermarrying is not genocide. If you are to fucking stupid to see the diference between a minor demographic trend brought about by the end of insitutionalized racism and a gas chamber, your brain is clearly defective or you beleive in repugnant ideologies that the sooner they are permianntly relegated along with the idea of the Flat Earth or the Five Humours in "The Big Book of False Nonsense Unelightend Man Once Believed in In", the better.
ImperatorZor 1 week ago
My ancestors harmed no one- no slaves or genocide, and in fact since the 1700s were keen on neighborly acceptance. This goes for both sides of my heritage, the white and the Lenape sides.
You know what else? That doesn't matter. No white American today has ever owned slaves, and no race of any kind has a right to demand "payback" for grievances that have no surviving parties left. I have been oppressed, and I only blame those who might be directly responsible, because it's *logical*.
benskin79 1 week ago
You don’t see such sensitivity training being forced upon anyone in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, or South America. You don’t hear China, Japan, or Israel being lectured to swing open their doors to foreigners. Almost exclusively, multiculturalism is a psychological marketing program designed for majority-white countries. Why is that?
KumarZimmerman08 1 week ago
@k0nslify well at least the gasing part was well organised not the mass shootings. how do you measure who went through more shit? i don't know if it is measurable.
goblinclaus 1 week ago
@k0nslify it wans't less than what other groups have experienced. the nazis killed 12-14 million civilians from the USSR, 5 millions from poland (jews included in those numbers), most other european countries lost hundreds of thousands of citizens. japan killed 7-16 million chinese citizens. and of course the axis lost millions of civilians too. the holocaust is not the first or the last genocide in history what was unique about it is that it was an industrial genocide and well organized.
goblinclaus 1 week ago
Great Britain does have free speech. You are wrong.
guyhooper999 1 week ago
Vonnegut's book Slautherhouse 5 is also one of my favourite books.
k0nslify 1 week ago
where did he get the bullshit that 70% of london is not white? 69% of the population is white, he got confused. anyway if most british people want britian to stay british i think they should have the right to preserve their ethnicity and heritage and not have their nation stolen from them.
goblinclaus 2 weeks ago
It's good not to have free speech then nobody can be discriminate and hurt full as it is illegal in the uk. Plus I don't agree with what she said but I dont like the fact of England not being White anymore. Its just not British.
dec370 2 weeks ago
@youmakemeracist Okay, I give up. You obviously don't know how to read or how to understand what you read. I did not call you anything you moron. I was trying to explain to you that the other poster and myself also agree to an extent with you. Get it? We were on your side. After seeing how dense you are I don't think you really know what you believe in yourself.
ANGELSRAGE77 2 weeks ago
A diversed population is easier to control. Because tensions from the lower class will be kept inside that class and fought between the different ethnicities. An easy way to take the rights away from the people, step by step, as we can see, once we turn away from the TV-God.
And thank you very much for describing the bombing of Dresden as a genocidal policy. In Germany we blame ourselves for that mass murder. If that isn't suicidal! Laws forbid to even call this a Holocaust (=Death by flames).
Bommelmensch 2 weeks ago
I don't consider it that United Arab Emirates is now >60% non-Arab. And I'm an Arab.
flameretardant 2 weeks ago
It's genocide if you kill them off dumbass. That is a good fucking reason to speak out against it? Do you think the british authorities go around, the ethnically british? No, of course they don't. Cultures develop. Get the fuck over it. So what if it's not a white country anymore?
GrungeRockabilly 2 weeks ago
93 % of primary schools in London are now majority BLACK.
By the year 2066, England will cease to be a white country.
Bluemax1945 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I AM WHITE I AM PROUD .... I HAVE HISTORY.... I WILL BE PROUD OF MY CULTURE..... I WILL STAND UP FOR MYSELF!!! AS YOU CAN SEE NOW HOW MUCH SHIT IS TALKED TO WHITES " JUST FOR STICKING UP FOR THEMSELVES" WE ARE CALLED RACIST, BIGOTS, REDNECK, BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA GET THE FUCK OUT.... LOVE A COMBAT INFANTRYMAN!!
youmakemeracist 2 weeks ago
@youmakemearacist Calm down. She was actually saying the opposite and sticking up for illiterate people like you. Learn how to read before you fly off your handle. People that claim to be against racism are just racists against whites or any other race that wants to survive.
ANGELSRAGE77 2 weeks ago
@ANGELSRAGE77 I am a racist, do u think I give a fuck? I hate gangs, druggies, junkies, thieves, punks, and lames fucks who think they run shit, while still sucking on moms tit!! If U label me a racist that's fine I don't give two shits what your armchair commander ass says!! Emma is a fucking hero, she is pissed off about the fucking London riots and telling everyone to their fucking face, instead of being cowards like the ones on here talking shit!! I have pride for my race not exploitation!
youmakemeracist 2 weeks ago
good video friend you are right but what you have to understand is that the white people are moving out of london ,that is why some not all parts of london are ethnic,most of the uk is white about 70% .
the woman is poor and uneducated if she does not like the part of london she lives in she should move essex or cornwall , good video fair and to the point............
sirknight1988 2 weeks ago
I AM WHITE I AM PROUD .... I HAVE HISTORY.... I WILL BE PROUD OF MY CULTURE..... I WILL STAND UP FOR MYSELF!!! AS YOU CAN SEE NOW HOW MUCH SHIT IS TALKED TO WHITES " JUST FOR STICKING UP FOR THEMSELVES" WE ARE CALLED RACIST, BIGOTS, REDNECK, BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA GET THE FUCK OUT.... LOVE A COMBAT INFANTRYMAN!!
youmakemeracist 2 weeks ago
@youmakemeracist That woman did not stand up for her race, she didn't exactly say racist things either. She just ranted and said stupid things, if you want to stand up for your race would you really do it the way she did? If so then you're not helping your cause since you wouldn't want anyone talking like this to you.
yoshobbit 1 week ago
It is not genocide because there is no mass murdering like during the colonial era.where entire civilizations were wiped out.
kxr225522 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are a fucking dumbass. Her Grandad fought against facists like her you fool!
dhextall1 2 weeks ago
The comments further proves the anti white theory. "Whites MUST accept non whites in their countries" or my favourite: "Payback time".
Anti racist = Anti white.
NellaN1337 2 weeks ago
@NellaN1337 w.t.f. are you talking about payback time??? your a fucking idiot!! i DIDN'T DO SHIT TO NO MOTHER FUCKING MAN B4 ME.... ALL THAT SHIT BACK IN THE DAY IS HISTORY!!! WHY SHOULD I BE PUNISHED FOR SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED BACK THEN IF SO BITCH GIVE ME MY $ FOR THE ROMANS ATTACKING GERMANY!!! LAME!!
youmakemeracist 2 weeks ago
@youmakemeracist
Calm the fuck down and read my comment again.
NellaN1337 2 weeks ago
@NellaN1337 Dude, shut. the. f*ck. up. Are you a racist?
yoshobbit 1 week ago
"According to the Office for National Statistics, based on 2009 estimates, 69.7 per cent of the 7,753,600 inhabitants of London were White" Fail.
DevilMayhem666 2 weeks ago
United Arab Emirates is 16.6% Emirati. A non-white country.
DevilMayhem666 2 weeks ago
Nice bull shit facts you twat
Rammstein6001 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Government has reported that WE HAVE OVER TWO MILLION ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN THIS COUNTRY. These illegals need to be tracked down and deported as a matter of urgency. The current figure of deportations is only 50,000 annually and this needs to be increased urgently. We MUST put our own people first as these parasitic illegals are sucking our welfare health and education system dry to the detriment of our own people.
clarissapar 2 weeks ago
Japan for the Japanese, Mexico for the Mexicans and Britain for EVERYBODY so it seems.... Fuck that and fuck any liberal tosser that backs that idea.
scousehead 3 weeks ago
@scousehead whites fuck off from usa canada australia and new zealand fuck off back to england you hypocrites
BILLY7860943 2 weeks ago
London is considered by many nowadays as no longer being a place for English people, nevermind the supposed capital of the country. England is a prime example of what happens to a nation when PC leftists call the shots.
scousehead 3 weeks ago
You get all the darkies out of England and we will stop bitching is nothing sacred
SWEJEHTKCUF 3 weeks ago
Of course it wouldn't be considered genocide if Lagos (capital of Nigeria is now Abuja, though) was 80% white or whatever. In fact here in South Africa we get your black equivalents constantly bitching about whites trying to wipe them out due to white people emigrating back to South Africa. You're stupid and they're stupid.
MegaWinnieGirl 3 weeks ago
70% of people in London are no more white they are more pink and yellow brownish ....
Mar2623 3 weeks ago
@Mar2623 or just ugley
SWEJEHTKCUF 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you purposely trying to look stupid, or do you really believe 70% of London is not white? Statistically London is 70% white.
It's also important to remember that England invented free speech, being one of the oldest democracies in the world. Now while there were a lot of minorities on that tram, there was no reason to start swearing at them. People can voice their opinions without being abusive.
There is a line between being anti-immigration and just racist.
MrShamsulalom1 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ramzpaul you cretin, its verbal abuse! what are you on about Britain has no freedom of speech! bloody Americans!
MrShamsulalom1 3 weeks ago
Ramzpaul you cretin, its verbal abuse! what are you on about Britain has no freedom of speech! bloody Americans!
MrShamsulalom1 3 weeks ago
Funny to see an American musing about another country being dominated by foreign emmigrants instead of its indigenous people.
graemeoliver84 3 weeks ago
@graemeoliver84 The Red Indians didn't like it and the White Europeans don't like it either. Also, dominated is the wrong word; invaded or intruded are more appropriate.
I, however, find it rather perplexing to hear the logic of liberals. "You did it to someone, therefore you can't complain when it's done to you!" People should want the survival of White Europeans -- we're actually an accomplished people.
return135 3 weeks ago 16
@return135 sir u suck. What that women did was racist. She wasnt defending anything, she was just spewing hatred from her mouth and no white europeans aren't any more accomplished than any other race in this world. So quit trying to act like ur race is better than the rest of us.
cj31501 1 week ago
@cj31501 Quit trying to pretend like your race is as accomplished as ours. When you invent the computer, airplane, automobile, electricity, telephone, internet, land someone on the moon, pioneer medical breakthroughs, create mathematics and physics as we know it, create philosophical concepts such as logic, build nations around the world and much more, then you can say you're comparable. No other race can compare, let's be honest.
return135 1 week ago
@return135 yea and slaughtered many other races of ppl to get there. Most the things ur race "created" is just a pun off what other races already did. This my race is better than yours crap is what i ruining this world. We are all human and we are all equals.
cj31501 1 week ago
@return135
This pre-supposes that the "holocaust" of the Jews also was correct. Yet, you hear no other people, moaning in louder voice about this supposed extermination...than the Jews.
What happened to the Jews in WWII was a damn fair less than what other ethnic-groups experienced in the same period. People forget that.
k0nslify 1 week ago
@return135 They don't care about us. When we are the minorities they are going to kill us all. They are not going to give us reservations like we do and they are not going to give us tax player dollars like we do for the Natives. They are just going to kill men women and children and re-wright the history books. The jews will rule over them.
wavepsychic 1 week ago
@return135 the ironic thing is the white race is the only race ever thats volunteered and encouraged others to wipe it out. Perhaps not the average white person but those in power certainly have.
Liam2621 1 week ago
@return135 - "The Red Indians didn't like it"
It doesn't seem the "White Europeans" really cared what the "Red Indians" did or didn't like judging by what they did to the Indians. But do tell how nonwhite people immigrating to Europe legally is akin to the European genocide on the Natives of the Americas while white people migrating to Africa, Latin America and Asia is just fine and is somehow not genocide? Do tell.
A86 6 days ago
@A86 . immigration is only legal because elites in Europe betrayed their own people. nobody's fool enough to let that many people come without thinking. it's the same thing as in America just a little bit more vicious : a substitution genocide. europeans are still lobotomized for the moment but patriotism is coming back everywhere in Europe. Euopeans are waking up and they'll fight to keep their homeland (over 2000 years old). there isnt any people in history that let die himself this way.
asilaydyingdg 6 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "a substitution genocide"
Genocide is when the population is actively being killed and exterminated en masse or not being allowed to reproduce, or being starved off. What official organization lists any European country as experiencing that right now? None. Tell me, is Westerners being allowed to immigrate to Japan, China and S. Korea a "genocide"? It is "genocide" for them to be allowed to go to S. Africa or Zimbabwe or the Caribbean?
A86 6 days ago
Comment removed
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
Comment removed
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@A86 genocide doesn't obviously mean mass murder with violence. check this wiki/Genocide_definitions.(lots of them agree with me) intent to destroy ,anti nations is enough and the result is the same. I wouldnt trust any of these official organizations since theyre against nations and systematically controled by countries governments . even with the common brainwashing and propaganda for multiculturalism its obvious. its written in black and white on the parliamentary assembly. they support it
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@A86 youre pretending not understanding for Asia ? if they have a job, I guess westerners can go to Asia. and same the other way with Asians of course. asian countries you talked about dont have any immigration. according to the anthropologist Levi Strauss "Japan is today the only country which is ethnically and culturally balanced : it absorbes and refuses an lot from outside".I read japanese are very reluctant to immigration even with their low birth rate and old people increase.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Asian countries, particularly China, S. Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore, tend to let a lot of Westerners immigrate regardless of their income level. As long as you're a Westerner who can speak English they allow you (white or black) to come there. Especially if you come there to get a job as an English teacher. In those cases you don't even have to speak the local langauge. Japan tends to be more selective but toward non-Western immigrants like Filipinos, Chinese & Africans.
A86 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - I would say most Asian countries are less selective and discriminatory in their immigration policy towards Westerners than Western countries are to Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants. Asian countries tend to be more discriminatory towards other Asian immigrants and to Middle Eastern and African immigrants. If you're a Western (particularly American) soldier stationed in Asia you can become a citizen fairly easily. Amazingly even North Korea used to allow this.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 and what wrong with that ? theyre just protecting themselves. they've the right to exist. the massive immigration Europe's been bearing for 40 years is from Africa and its not work. (10 millions in France) trust me if the entire african continent was going to China it'd happen very differently. Chinese people havent adhered to stupid universalist humanism values promoted by europeans goverment and dont give a shit about it. this propanganda is done to disarm and weaken people of Europe .
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "they've a right to exist"
And who is stopping them from existing? No one. It's no one's fault but their own that their birth rate is so low. No one's stopping them from having more kids.
"Europe's been bearing for 40 years is from Africa" As has Africa. As of 2010 Africa's population is over 1% white. So it's okay for Europeans to immigrate to South Africa, Zimbabwe and Kenya but it's okay for Africans to immigrate to Europe? That's mighty hypocritical.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 Im saying it'd be insane for Japanese to let massive immigration come from evevrywhere given that birth rate is low and immigrants (in Africa for instance) have the highest on the planet.its suicidal. anyway the immigration you are talking about for Asia is different from Europe it's only for work. in France 90% of the immigration is for family reunification.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Please explain how it would be "suicidal". This seems to be the basis of your problem - you have a deep misunderstanding of population and genetics. If their population rate is low enough to be "suicidal", even banning ALL immigration would not do a damn thing to change that. If their birth rate is that low. They'll be gone either way. Unless the immigrants are going to kill them off in some coordinated effort.
A86 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "only for work"
Um, no, the Westerners don't go there like on some work visa. Many go and live in Asia for years and years. Some never leave (like expatriates) and some live in Asia long enough to have kids with local women (or men if they are female immigrants).
Immigration from non-European countries tends to be family reunication because they come from countries colonized by France at some point and now all the good jobs are in the colonial parent nation - France.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 western and Asia trade qualified labour works and some people that do want to settle in new culture&country. whereas Europe welcome the third world . difference is colonization is over and 1% white left in South Africa prob be kicked out soon. Europeans had ressources when they came to Africa and it was to do business no to settle. so its wasnt ok. but history'll never be ok in that case. if African never get over colonisations and start building their own continent & keep their ressources
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - I love how you assume non-white immigrants are all from the "third world". Some are from places better off than the European countries they go and move to Europe for political reasons. And do explain you mean by "welcome" them and how nonwhite immigrants moving to Europe is different than white immigrants moving to non-white nations.
"colonization is over"
Officially, but the effects have not left. In many of those countieis the West still owns the resources.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 I was talking a lot about France. the great majority of immigrants that come to France is from Africa. family reunion is "welcoming". there is no massive flows of europeans moving to non western countries today. whereas there are 200000 legal non europeans immigrants from Africa moving to France every year.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - In proportion to population size there are large Western immigrations to Brazil, South Africa and Singapore. The biggest immigrations on the planet are from Afghanistan to Pakistan and back and forth between Pakistan and India. Looking at France's black population size that number sounds fishy. Unless it's including temporary immigrants who leave not long (within 2-5 years) after arriving.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 of course these are neighbour terrirories. A lot of the current europeans people come from long intra -european mix too.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - If you start stabbing a person and then stop the damage you've done doesn't magically heal as soon as you stop stabbing.
"Europeans had ressources when they came to Africa and it was to do business"
When? Many today move to Africa permanently, most do not move on work visas since Europe has more jobs than Africa. If you're referring to the colonial age that is certainly not true, Europeans came to Africa to steal resources because Africa had (and still has) more resources.
A86 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "but history'll never be ok in that case"
It's not even really about making things "okay". Humans have forever moved about the planet. This is nothing new. The only thing new is the concept of nation-states. There was only a "France" in the past 250 years or so and only a "South Africa" in the past 150 years. Thinking humans will ever stop emigrating is unrealistic. Africans should have the right to move wherever like everyone has the right to move to Africa.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 all Im saying is Africans'll eventually have to get over colonization if they want to build their countries and coming in Europe as an eternal victim is certainly not the right thing to do." humans always moved nothing new" is not a way to justifiy massive immigration. humans moved in the past but certainly not millions in 30 years. massive immigration like that is pretty new for europeans since war agains muslim in middle-age.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - I agree with you that Africa will have to overcome its colonization problems and will have to stop being the eternal victim. But Europeans with your mindset will have to stop playing eternal victim as well, especially if you're gonna move to other people's countries.
"not millions in 30 years"
Apparently you never heard of the Mongol takeover of the Kievan 'Rus. Or the Christian migration to Jerusalem during and after the Crusades.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 where'd you see europeans're playing victims ? it's the opposite they stand up and show that their people exist.dont know how&where there could big immigrations of Europeans today !? so you're comparing extra european invasion (Kievan'Rus) at the Europe borders &part of european history, religious expeditionary war (not migration lol) to what happens now ?
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@A86 well I guess thats a glimpse of the certainly "primitive" for this human rights age but natural and legitime reaction that what will happen if massive immiragtion continue.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@A86 France's been existing for 250 years, haha are you kidding ? as a republic state you mean maybe . but the history of French people and their roots like the other europeans started way before the "state" thats what matters more because thats what makes people exist. same for south Africa : a recentlty state made with different ethnies. im not contesting the right of Africans or anyone to move wherever they want but if you settle your whole family in my house dont expect me not to react
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Yes, that's what I meant. As a republic. South Africa existed long before the 1800s but didn't exist as a modern republic. You can react about people immigrating if you want to, but you don't have the right to stop them as long as they're not breaking the law or hurting people.
Countries that try to restrict immigrants usually do get criticized by the UN. Japan is heavily criticized for its policy by the UN as is Zimbabwe for its policies towards white immigration.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 back in the Middle-Age this would have been different there would have been a real solidarity even "tribal" reactions. the right today is only what is decided by UN.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - I hate to burst your bubble but tribes back then had little problem selling their fellow tribesmen to other tribes as slaves. Eastern Europeans sold other Eastern Europeans as slaves to the Mongol Khaganate all the time. Same with Africans selling each other.
"only what is decided by the UN"
Which people like you have no problem referencing to claim you're under a "genocide", the same organization you complain is unjust or useless. Talk about hypocrisy. *eyeroll*
A86 5 days ago
@A86 yes thats why no people in the world can stop existing without fighting this is survival reactions, unless enslaved. but if someone of your tribe sell your brother thats probably because hes getting some bribe from the enemy and has therefore no dignity. I recognize we are not under a genocide now but it is an potential future UN and other globalist organisations submit our betrayers leaders to open Europe doors. so therefore it's more like a potential substitution genocide
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@A86 Im opposed to the argument of letting immigrants in because autochtone birth is low (not low enough to be suicidal, it takes a bit longer)
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "because autochtone birth is low"
That's not an argument. There is no international right for the "autochthonous" population to be the majority. Otherwise, like I said, Native Americans should have the right to ship out most US citizens. Their birth rate is low enough they'll be a small minority in their own land for the foreseeable future.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 you did understand the whole argument "Im opposed to let immigrants in for the reason of autochtone low birht rate in a way that it can help balance this rate"t Yes there not such international right. But Im not following the international right which is anti nations or any other. yes native Americans should have had the right to ship most US citizen but they were outnumbered and not as strong thats the only law there was. but I'd understand if they were able to ship them out
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Some Europeans (such as yourself) are playing victim by pretending they're somehow being harmed by immigration and using drama queen terms like "genocide" to describe it (which is insulting to any ethnic group that has undergone a REAL genocide, like the Herero or Tutsis or European Jews).
A86 5 days ago
@A86 its unconsciously or not warnings what can happen by the end of the century if immigrations isnt reduced. and I think it's quite understandable : people living in the countryside can be quite surprised when going to the capital and find that there are really few French in Paris or English in London. well actually immiration does harm since 70% people in jail in France are Muslim (Islam is the hidden word for immigration)
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "its unconsciously or not warnings what can happen by the end of the century if immigrations isnt reduced"
What will happen? If you're claiming the "indigenous" population will go away completely link your source and explain exactly how this will happen.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 my source is that for ex in major cities like Marseille or even in London, the majority of names given to new born babies are Arabic, African name or Indian names which obviously mean new generation of immigrants not autochtone.its not hard to understand. if you let people come that have a higher birth rate than yourself. its obvious than the population is slowly being replaced. its not a violent genocide in 3 years but takes a few decades and that is enough. same results; a new polulation
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - I know in the UK the most common baby name in 2010 was "Muhammad", however, this is because Muslims give boys that name at a high rate as opposed to Europeans who don't use a particular name that often. Never heard of that situation in France but I suspect a similar thing is going on.
"the population is slowly being replaced"
1) This assumes the population with the lower birth rate has one low enough not to maintain any population at all. 2) This assumes the one with the
A86 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - higher birth rate will continue on that way indefinitely. Not a realistic assumption. By your "logic" the Middle East should have the world's highest population. In reality Europe has a bigger population than the Middle East.
3) This also ignores a key problem: If the white European birth rate is so low that Europeans will disappear anyway how will keeping others out magically stop this disappearance? In other words - your argument makes no damn sense.
A86 4 days ago
@A86 would have been already here and brought continously like it has been for 30 years. so it would be slowly a replacement then (sort of balance in terms of demography but still replacement) Middle East countries (but not Africa) have less people since less developped and less density too, but bring immigrants and their families and they have everything needed plus their higher birth rate. its true there a lot of steps to lead to that "genocide" but thats why we feel the first tensions .
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - It's like saying keeping everyone away from a vanishing man will cause him to stop vanishing. If the European birth rate is so low that it's "suicidal" NOTHING is going to stop Europeans from disappearing unless they have more kids, which they can do whether non-whites are present or not.
If you're arguing that whites in Europe may not be the majority, like I said, there is no legal right to be the majority.
A86 4 days ago
@A86 I think quite a lot of other foreign names were given in the list. being in the list is enough anyway to show that its is high proportion of new babies born so the next generations. you say some true things about growth and birht rate of people. but as I said this phenomenon is something that will happens slowly.beside, the economic system needs people for cheap labour work and consumers too, so it'll make more and immigration come. if the europeans disappear an extra european population
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Yes, but Muslims have a very high rate of naming boys "Muhammad". It's like the name "John" was 1 or 2 generations ago in the US where like every other guy was named "John" or "Michael". I don't think any other signficantly large groups name their kid any particular name as often as Muslims name boys "Muhammad".
Anyways..
"happens slowly"
What does? Multiple ethnic groups with different birth rates live in other countries and none has died out (except during wars).
A86 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - And you still glossed over the fact that if the white European birth rate is so low that they're going to die out, keeping others out of Europe will do nothing to stop this. Like my comparison earlier to a vanishing man. What you're saying also assumes that minorities will produce at high rates forever, which is not realistic.
"needs people for cheap labor"
Now that I do have a problem with when it comes to immigration. But the immigrants are as much victims as the natives
A86 4 days ago
@A86 of not being the majority in hometowns,cities even there is not legal right for that. the problem with that international legal right is that it's egalitarianism and universalist (a form of ethnocentrism too) thinking all these laws should rule the world, apply to everybody and that humans are all exchangeable.it forgets people have an identity and want to keep it and making million immigrants from completely differnent place is not helping. it was hard enough between Europeans themselves..
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Uh, what ethnicity is egalitarianism and universalism based around (you accused it of being ehtnocentric). You shouldn't knock universalism since you are demanding it for your own "group". The non-egalitarian thing to do would be to just the Europeans be wiped out. Survival of the fittest. If the non-white people were able to overwhelm the white population that would mean the nonwhites were evolutionarily preferred, using Darwinian logic.
A86 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "it forgets people have an identity"
Not all. However, cultural identites are not eternal. You think the cultural identities of European countries today is the same as it was 500 years ago? 1000 years ago? lol Nope. Cultures change and all cultures today are the result of various cultures mixing and changing over time. Great Britain is probably one of the biggest hodgepodge cultures in the world outside of Central Asia.
A86 4 days ago
@A86 I think your interpration of the names isnt entirely true. Muhammed is indeed the most given names by muslims. But it’s not the only foreign name of the list. In Bruxelles the seven most given names are Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine et Hamza. Apart from Adam ( hebrew origin name btw) none of the rest is european. And it’s similar in Marseilles and probably London too. Muslims represent 25% in Marseilles, Rotterdam, 20% in Malmo, 15% in Bruxelles, 10% Paris, Londres, Copenhague.
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Never said it's the only foreign name, just the most common because there are no other foreign cultures in the UK or France where a particular name is as common as it is among Muslims (or those other minorities are not as numerous as Muslims).
A86 3 days ago
@A86 That doesnt even include the other immigrants that arent Muslims. the forecast also says there will be more than 20% of muslims in Europe by 2050. and its already the case in most big cities. Again in France the growth population is entirely due to immigration. Yes it doesnt means it helps Europeans to die of course but just says a large proportion of new generations to come wont be europeans so in the end it’s the same. More immigrants on the continent and less europeans. Even if we where
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "also says there will be more than 20% of muslims in Europe by 2050"
And? South Africa is already 20% non-black (or not fully black). By your logic the black natives should be claiming they're under a genocide since they're only the 80% majority in their entire country (not just the cities).
A86 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asilaydyingdg - "just says a large proportion of new generations to come wont be europeans"
Wow. France being "only" (not like that's a small number) 80% white French in the urban areas by 2050 instead of 99% means Europeans have died out? That's quite a drama queen/king-like mentality.
A86 3 days ago
@A86 dying by the end of century (we’d have found solutions to avoid it hopefully) making people come that obviously are growing faster than us is problematic. Immigrants from Italy, Spain and Poland in France already met difficulties to integrate in France after 1940. Im really sceptical about the integration of millions of people that dont share the same appearance, cultural roots, behaviours and language.
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "sceptical about the integration of millions of people that dont share the same appearance, cultural roots, behaviours and language"
It's been happening since time immemorial. What you call "Spanish" or "French" culture even before significant immigration from outside of Europe is the result of thousands of years of different people mixing. Do you think to be ethnically "French" was in 1900 what it was in 1000 AD? 500 AD? Or is that okay as long as the people are "white"?
A86 3 days ago
@A86 Yes in addition to cheap labour problem, immigrants are as much victims as autochtone for the integration too. That reminds me of the video “my tram experience” where that African woman says to the English woman “we do the work for you” which is wrong. Native dont accept poor working conditions and low wages but immigrants would do anything just to come in a fantasized Europe and big CEOs know it thats why they support massive immigration
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "Im not asking for universalism for my group"
Asking that your culture be granted special status as a protected group, like some kind of rare bird or endangered animal, IS asking for universalist sympathy. A non-universalist or non-egalitarian would just say, "Welp, if the native people can't keep their own population numbers up just let 'em go. Survival of the fittest. They can just go the way of the Native Americans."
A86 3 days ago
@A86 Im not asking for universalism for my group. Its the opposite,Im against that “Same” culture ideology that thends to erase differences and bring back everything ofhumanity as One. The fact that this ideology has been invented by the degenerate society of westerners doesnt make it right at all, and even less to followIn that way universalism is just another form of ethnocentrism.(judging another culture from your own culture).
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - According to non-egalitarians it's not natural to protect creatures from extinction....
"that thends to erase differences and bring back everything ofhumanity as One"
There was never a time when the cultures of humanity were as one. Also, if Europeans should have the right to exist outside of Europe, such as the Americas, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, S. Africa, etc. then why should they have special privilege to deny others the same freedom to live abroad?
A86 3 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "just another form of ethnocentrism"
What ethnicity is it central around? For something to be "ethnocentrist" it has to be biased in favor of a particular ethnicity.
"Egalitarianism and universalism hasnt got any ethnicity" Then by definition it can't be "ethnocentrist". It's like saying someone is "sexist" for not favoring either sex.
A86 3 days ago
@A86 And Im against France involvelment in anything that doesnt harm its interest.
Egalitarianism and universalism hasnt got any ethnicity since the aim of it is to create a sort unique human from al the existing differences not to allow groups exist separately. The non egalitarian treatment you are talking about is already happening since new generations upcoming in Europe arent europeans as a majority.
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "aim of it is to create a sort unique human from"
In other words, you're complaining that egalitarians allow humans the freedom to interact with whomever they'd like...
"not to allow groups exist separately" By this you mean not viewing authoritarian closed-door immigration policies as legitimate or constructive. Your complaint is that egalitarians don't agree with North Korean-type immigration policies (North Korea is notorious for allowing almost no outsiders in).
A86 3 days ago
@A86Same thing in terms of culture, there are new communities living in Europe with their own culture how is that egalitarian for European culture ?the assimilation (unlike multiculturalism anglosaxon) of Spanish took time in France but these people from immigration feel French as much as someone whose ancestors have been in French territory for generations. But this assimilations needed efforts of course like changing your first name and even taking the family name of the person you’d marry
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asilaydyingdg - "how is that egalitarian for European culture ?"
The same way it's egalitarian to allow non-black cultures to exist in Africa and non-Native cultures to exist in the Americas and Canada.
Also, what is "European culture"? There is no singular European culture, and the many cultures of Europe are themselves a mix of different ethnic cultures from the past. Some of them from outside of Europe. Some of the culture of Hungary is from Central Asian culture. Same with Russia.
A86 3 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Spanish culture is itself a mix of Roman, Visigothic, Celto-Iberian and Moorish culture and has been for over 1,000 years. There's a reason that Spanish music bears a vague resemblance to Middle Eastern and North African music sometimes and why the Spanish language has loanwords from Arabic. Like "Ojala" ("perhaps"), borrowed from Arabic "Allah".
A86 3 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "like changing your first name and even taking the family name of the person you’d marry"
So people should now not be allowed to change their names or change their surnames after marrying if the person they marry is not European?
A86 3 days ago
@A86 Survival of the fittest is not the current trend of the evolution since we are not biologically or genetically evolving anymore or very little and slowly. at least it is not what made doing the big jump form animals to humans building civilzations. The increase complexity of human brain as it has developped, allowed to developp in a cultural way. We are able to rule the the different imperatives of survival, natural conditions. For instance we cure the diseases due to genetic mutations.
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asilaydyingdg - "since we are not biologically or genetically evolving anymore"
Evolution doesn't stop. Humans are still evolving today, and according to some scientists more rapidly than we previously had been for quite some time. It's doubtful that humans 40,000 years from now (if we don't kill each other first) will look like exactly like humans look today.
"differences between continents" Genetically there are more differences between humans within continents than between.
A86 3 days ago
@A86 They are of course differences in terms of how advanced are civilizations ,differences between continents but it is possible to teach it to non europeans coming in Europe how to rule it when they are young. My point is“fittest survival” does not make any sense to me since we are not running in woods anymore we have passed this stage.
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@A86 I wonder how you explain people in the world can exist without any identity. Cultural identity arent eternal of course it builds over time like layers upon each other and that is what makes a civilization.Cultural identity in Europe isnt certainly the same as it was 500 years ago or before due to scientific progress, industrial revolution and intra invasions between europeans.But the roots are still the same and very present I think : celtic, greek-latin, germanic and christian influences
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "can exist without any identity"
Who said some people have no identity?
"it builds over time like layers upon each other" Sometimes. Some populations gradually (or rapidly) phase out their old cultures and adopt a new or foreign one. Do you think Sudanese culture is today what it was 1,500 years ago? Nope. Today Sudanese culture is Arab-like now opposed to what it was in ancient times (Nubian times). French culture is much more Germanic today than its original Celtic culture.
A86 3 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - The ancient Gaulic culture of what's today France (Gaul) was rapidly Romanized by Roman presence and later largely displaced by the Germanic culture of the Franks, Normans and Teutons. The Celtic Gaul culture is largely gone today and only traces remain in modern French culture. Little is left of the language anymore in the modern French language which is mostly Latin-based with Germanic Frankish influence.
A86 3 days ago
@A86 For France there havent been any massive immigrations since the viking invasions (around 800) until today so the population until late 1940 and 30 years ago has been stable and balanced. That is why the massive immigration from outside Europe today is new and worrying. And it is similar for the rest of Europe too
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "Great Britain today multicultiralism is not what I call an identity and neither is the consumerist, mercantilist"
Gotta agree with you on that (and your complaints about how immigration policy exploits low-income immigrants and puts native workers out of a job in European countries). This is the result of globalist Neoliberal and Neoconservative post-industrial capitalism and its materialistic values.
A86 3 days ago
@A86 Great Britain today multicultiralism is not what I call an identity and neither is the consumerist, mercantilist anglo-saxon that spread over ther world. At least we see that the effects are ending with the crisis. and I bet the communities living there feel more belonging to their parents origin than feel British.thats what Muslims say.. For me it’s not part of the european civilization
asilaydyingdg 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asilaydyingdg - "anglo-saxon that spread over ther world"
Speaking of, that's another example of a culture that exists by displacement. British culture today is much more Anglo-Saxon than it was 1,000 years ago. The culture of the Anglo-Saxon invaders who came to represent the majority in England almost completely wiped out the aboriginal Stonehenge culture (which was non-Indo-European) and the Celtic Brythonic culture. The English language is much more Latin-Germanic than Celtic today.
A86 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asilaydyingdg - "well actually immiration does harm since 70% people in jail in France are Muslim"
The French gov't doesn't keep demographics on inmates. This figure was estimated by "Muslim leaders". No telling how accurate this is, it could just as easily be a very inflated figure to get more radical Muslims riled up and accuse the French gov't of targeting Muslims. Supposedly some of them are illegals and some are criminals from impoverished neighborhoods.
A86 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "does harm"
By that logic being around any humans should be considered hazardous. The average white French citizen is more likely to be victimized by another white French person.
"but it is an potential future UN" There's going to be a systematic wiping out of white Europeans? By whom? Who is going to prevent them from living or execute them in mass numbers?
A86 5 days ago
@A86Im afraid it's not only in France that Africans and Arabs have a bad reputation. you are saying that since there are still more French native that Arabs, the average of attacks on French native is done by other French native but its wrong in reality most attacks are done by immigrants. I told you 70% people in jail are from immigration. it won't happen like a massive wiping
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@A86 but if immigration continues like it does we may reach a point not now but by the end of century where autochtone are barely the majority. you think autochtone doesnt have to be a majority but in reality it doesnt work like that, making millions of people come is cool but you have integrate them. well in France its becoming like in UK French native leave suburbs wheres there are in minority beacause they dont feel at
home anymore; that is simple to understand
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@A86 and if you let that continue immigrants'll ask their own laws like they already do in UK for sharia, then they'll ask to have independant zone. tell me why should I accept that some communities live in my country like that ? dont answer the internanationa law says its ok I know they support it. and btw we already reached a point where in big cities autochtone arent majority anymore. I take the exemple of London or in Sweden or Norway (with cities like Malmo) and they didint colonize anyone
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - "Chinese people havent adhered to stupid universalist humanism values"
According to whom? The Chinese government is still partially socialistic and adheres, at least officially, to egalitarianism. If you think egalitarianism and universalism is so "stupid" then you should have no problem with people like President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. He doesn't believe in universalism either and believes in limiting the non-black popuation of Zimbabwe and Africa.
A86 5 days ago
Comment removed
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@A86 its communism not socialism. so in many ways similar to Russia which is very nationalistic too. wanting an egalitarist society for your people is not wanting to adapt your recipe principles to the rest of the world. western universilism tries to make believe that everybody is exchangeable to another (this suits very well captalism which features blig flows of goods, capitals and humans) as long as there's the human rights religion but I dont think populations can be moved this way.
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - What on Earth are you talking about? What does communism or sociailsm have to do with the right to live where you want to live? If anything the policies you promote are more like the Soviet Union - the Soviet Union heavily restricted who could enter the country. So did Red China. That sounds like a lot like you on that issue.
"western univeralism"
Psst, Western nations aren't the only ones who don't heavily restrict the number of immigrants.
A86 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Also, the "right to live" argument you used earlier was fallacious. You would have to prove that immigrant will somehow cause the native population to die off. If by "right to live" you mean 'right to be the majority population" no such international law or right exists. The native population doesn't have the right to be the majority. If it did Native Americans would have the right to forcibly remove all or most non-Amerindian Americans, including the white American majority.
A86 5 days ago
@A86 it's not a genocide in the African countries since Africans autochtone are not getting a minority in their homeland. I disagree with the colonies and the conflicts they made but colons who went there were bourgeois middle class and rich industrialist not the people of Europe and it was clearly to do business. Europe ruins itself anyway with the colonies. the argument saying you did it so dont complain when its done to you is childish. not even comparable. how about scandinavian colonies ?!
asilaydyingdg 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - Uh, neither are Europeans. There isn't one European nation on the planet where the local main European ethnicity is the minority. The UK, one of the European nations with the highest nonwhite minority population, is still over 90% white and 85% "white British". South Africa's population is only about 80% black (not counting "Coloreds") - it's more non-black than Britain is non-white.
And other people outbreeding the natives is NOT genocide.
A86 5 days ago
@asilaydyingdg - A genocide would be if the government or some institutional body (like a military) is actively not allowing white Britons to reproduce or is sterilizing them or starving them off.
"the argument saying you did it so dont complain when its done to you is childish"
It's more