For grins, run this vid, then mute it. Open second tab, search for "The Andy Griffith Show Original Opening 1960." Wait for que leader to run, then click back to this tab and run vid again and pretend this is Don Knots. ;)
OK, 20 something layers of nylon, capton film, and teflon coated glass fiber beta cloth? This is supposed to protect people from the conditions on the moon?LOL
I guess Cernan WAS being exceedingly reckless considering all the bottle glass and dry wall screws in that soil that could have freyed the patches on his knees.
Most sand has some dust in it, unless it is soaking wet. The moon dust looked pretty dry in the pictures, and unlike on Earth, there is no atmosphere to suspend it in the form of dust clouds.
Face it. We went to the moon. All evidence points TOWARD an actual landing, and AWAY from a faked landing.
... and sand does not retain bootprints the way lunar soil does.The lunar soil is undeniably a fine powder like plaster dust or flour, and these would raise great clouds of dust in the atmosphere if kicked around like that.
Try spraying the sand lightly with an aerosol-fine water jet, leave it to penetrate and pervade for a few minutes and Bob's your uncle. Very fine bootprints in a shallow layer of desert sand. Cuts out the hovering dust clouds too when kicked up!
The sand falls back down just like on earth!!!
Apply a little slo mo, some wires and hey presto!
Mikey... So there was someone with a hudson sprayer just out of camera, spritzing the soil where the astronauts were about to walk WHILE leaving no footprints of their own? Don't forget, the original footage is NOT a series of little one minute YouTube clips... it's three hour, uncut, continuous video. Your explanation does not address the true scope of this evidence.
The bootprints are documented in many formats and are consistant from image to image. No stage hand boot prints evident. Isn't this "moist sand" is also your excuse for there being no dust floating on air in the video shots? As for the hours of uncut video... They set up the camera and broadcast entire EVAs. I skipped school and watched ALL the moonwalks as they happened w/parent's blessing. You can watch them too in the SC films.
Yes, that's moist sand being kicked up in slo mo by Cernan on wires - you put it better than I have in fact.
Re. SC films version. Yes I have - but it's not uncut footage. In fact it looks like highly edited pre-recorded material that was passed off by NASA as a live event. The astronauts' lines sound as if they were read off a well-rehearsed script and dubbed onto the video footage later.
Well... hell. Now I'll actually have to WATCH the SC DVDs so I'll quit putting my foot in my mouth... but it was all straight, live feed when they broadcast it back then. "Sound as if" don't cut it in front of a live jury, by the way. Their every movement WAS scripted... and they wore the script in a little booklet on their sleeve. Highly choreographed to maximize effifiency for this rare opportunity.
Now you're being even more silly than ever satbeavers.
Sorry your photobucket leads seem to have dried up of late. Guess you'll just have to settle for your own stagnant imagination pool from now on, or else whatever under-table scraps you can lick up and chew from my comments - just like your friend the squeaky- voiced piglet :)
BTW I finally realised why you work for Disney etc - you're a complete joke.
Whatever... TELL us, StMark Almighty... what do YOU do when you aren't sitting here wasting your life away with this bullshit? What is YOUR noble and superior profession?
Hi res photos of Jack " geology" Schmidt with his face exposed eh?
Well I'm flattered that someone ( HLAR?) has spent so much searching, just on my say-so. Glad you take me so seriously!
But seriously, Mr Disney, you shouldn't waste our time like this, there are no full face visor-ups anywhere on the Apollo Hassleblads. Only sneak glimpses of 1990s stand-ins.
I dare say you'll soon have this scrap lead of mine up and running on YOUR original little PB, what?
Who cares about Schmidt. You have repeatedly made an issue of my career. You have now made careers the prime issue here. Tell us what you do, SkidMark. Tell us why you have the right to feel so thoroughly superior about careers, Mikey. What is your magnificent job description? Be specific and stop avoiding the issue!
Your paranoid assertion is a cheap attempt to dodge the question, Skid. From what lofty throne do cast such frothing assertions? Tell us what you do for a living that is so much more noble than the rest of us.
Your cowardly dodge reverses the the true issue, Skid, for it is you that impute my character based on my means of gainful employment. I am calling you on this issue and challenge you to explain to everyone how your livelyhood makes you so superior. Tell us how you earn your keep and how that makes you better than the rest of us!
"What madness makes you impute a persons character..." You ask this and continue with the defamation, while avoiding the question? You are a raging, flaming coward, StMark, afraid of divulging your convenience store cashier job, I have to guess, since you are cowering behind your fear of telling us the truth.
So that's all it takes? You feel a little put-out and we're done with it? "There are NO images with a visor up". Well, here's four. "They're fake". No effort on your part. Cringe and dodge the issue. Duck and cover. Cower and hide. You hoaxers are spineless and worthless. Enjoy your little sand box.
Of the four images you or HLAR have unearthed weeks after my throwing you dogs the lead ( yet again, yaaaaawn ), three of them feature some guy with visor two thirds down and with no identifiable facial features.
In the fourth the visor is only halfway down ( wild applause ) but then we only see part of the forehead and eyebrows of the shy dude within. If you think you can identify someone without seeing the lower two thirds of their face or their eyes, then good luck gumshoe.
One last question, SkidMark... Do you speak openly and freely at work, without any concern, about your personal beliefs of the varacity of the moon landings? Are you free of any aprehension about your bosses and coworkers knowing your views about this?
Wow this guy is obviously and quite literally a puppet on a string. I pose this question, With death a certainty if a puncture occurs in the pressurized suit, why is he bouncing and falling with reckless abandon? Is it because he is here on earth? Or is Gene Cernan, A NASA trained astronaut just that stupid?
I met Mr. Cernan once and, unlike you, he is NOT stupid. With the benefit of lots of testing and five prior lunar landings, Gene and Jack had a pretty good idea of how much punishment their suits could safely take.
I may be stupid but Still, would you risk it? Not like anybody could help you if it did get punctured. I think most people would be more careful if they were on the surface of the moon 200,000 miles away from the nearest sewing kit.
The early astronauts were more careful. But as I said before, the suits were tested to the nth degree. Also there was a lot going on on the moon and thing were pretty exciting so one tended to run about when something interesting happened.
Sorry I called you stupid but you called Gene stupid first (neener neener)
All I'm saying is I wouldn't be running around if it meant that I might die as a result of the real possibility of puncture(however slim you know that there is a chance). 200,000 miles away from help, You'd think everything would be taken very soberly.
For grins, run this vid, then mute it. Open second tab, search for "The Andy Griffith Show Original Opening 1960." Wait for que leader to run, then click back to this tab and run vid again and pretend this is Don Knots. ;)
RustyRazor2010 3 months ago
"I'm on the moon ♫"
"wow! I just tripped =("
"screw that, I'm on the moon, yippie! ♫"
Laurelindo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TRUE WORDS SPOKEN watch?v=BnKlHgDBjUI
NASAHOAX 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There's a mountain of evidence that they faked the moon landindings. Here's a link to some of it.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread dot()php?t=144487
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored 1 year ago
Boom, right on top of that Hasselblad! Or did he catch himself just before it hit the dirt? I assume there's a lens cap.
I think he was galloping a little too happily there LOL
El135o 2 years ago
increible como se nota q esta colgado en 0:28 la inclincacion es antinatural, haya la gravedad q haya.
pento1000 2 years ago
My favorite quote from Apollo 17 after Gene says "Ok Houston, the Challenger has landed."
CAPCOM Bob Parker (in a bored voice): "Roger Challenger, that's super."
curea229 3 years ago
I think Bob was the strictest of the Apollo EVA CapComs but he lets out some humor when Gene falls at nother time.
XmegaPresident 3 years ago
Gene's cool! He's my fave NAVY astronaut!!!
tracyterry 4 years ago
he can stand like that cause of the heavy box he has on his back.
IamWeasel2 4 years ago
plus he has to put very little effort, the moon has less gravity than earth.
1stNeoSpartan 4 years ago
OK, 20 something layers of nylon, capton film, and teflon coated glass fiber beta cloth? This is supposed to protect people from the conditions on the moon?LOL
CaptainUSA 5 years ago
I guess Cernan WAS being exceedingly reckless considering all the bottle glass and dry wall screws in that soil that could have freyed the patches on his knees.
satweavers 5 years ago
The suit is extremely tough with 25 layers of laminated material. DUH!
Hoaxers and Xylene...it's not just for breakfast anymore. LOL!
LindaStevensBZ 5 years ago
Sand does not produce dust clouds when you kick it. You can kick it and it will fly just like this video, however no cloud will be produced.
CaptainUSA 5 years ago
Most sand has some dust in it, unless it is soaking wet. The moon dust looked pretty dry in the pictures, and unlike on Earth, there is no atmosphere to suspend it in the form of dust clouds.
Face it. We went to the moon. All evidence points TOWARD an actual landing, and AWAY from a faked landing.
tuttt99 5 years ago
... and sand does not retain bootprints the way lunar soil does.The lunar soil is undeniably a fine powder like plaster dust or flour, and these would raise great clouds of dust in the atmosphere if kicked around like that.
satweavers 5 years ago
Try spraying the sand lightly with an aerosol-fine water jet, leave it to penetrate and pervade for a few minutes and Bob's your uncle. Very fine bootprints in a shallow layer of desert sand. Cuts out the hovering dust clouds too when kicked up!
The sand falls back down just like on earth!!!
Apply a little slo mo, some wires and hey presto!
Here's one I made earlier.......
Photobucket / Michaelstmark
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Mikey... So there was someone with a hudson sprayer just out of camera, spritzing the soil where the astronauts were about to walk WHILE leaving no footprints of their own? Don't forget, the original footage is NOT a series of little one minute YouTube clips... it's three hour, uncut, continuous video. Your explanation does not address the true scope of this evidence.
satweavers 4 years ago
I doubt very much it's a "three hour uncut continuous video". Where's your evidence for that?
As for sprinklers, remember Langley AFB has fantastic bespoke overhead facilities.
And don't forget we don't see those fine bootprints on the TV - only on the Hasselblad stills.
And photos are a cinch to manipulate, always have been.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
The bootprints are documented in many formats and are consistant from image to image. No stage hand boot prints evident. Isn't this "moist sand" is also your excuse for there being no dust floating on air in the video shots? As for the hours of uncut video... They set up the camera and broadcast entire EVAs. I skipped school and watched ALL the moonwalks as they happened w/parent's blessing. You can watch them too in the SC films.
satweavers 4 years ago
Yes, that's moist sand being kicked up in slo mo by Cernan on wires - you put it better than I have in fact.
Re. SC films version. Yes I have - but it's not uncut footage. In fact it looks like highly edited pre-recorded material that was passed off by NASA as a live event. The astronauts' lines sound as if they were read off a well-rehearsed script and dubbed onto the video footage later.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Well... hell. Now I'll actually have to WATCH the SC DVDs so I'll quit putting my foot in my mouth... but it was all straight, live feed when they broadcast it back then. "Sound as if" don't cut it in front of a live jury, by the way. Their every movement WAS scripted... and they wore the script in a little booklet on their sleeve. Highly choreographed to maximize effifiency for this rare opportunity.
satweavers 4 years ago
Now you're being even more silly than ever satbeavers.
Sorry your photobucket leads seem to have dried up of late. Guess you'll just have to settle for your own stagnant imagination pool from now on, or else whatever under-table scraps you can lick up and chew from my comments - just like your friend the squeaky- voiced piglet :)
BTW I finally realised why you work for Disney etc - you're a complete joke.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Whatever... TELL us, StMark Almighty... what do YOU do when you aren't sitting here wasting your life away with this bullshit? What is YOUR noble and superior profession?
satweavers 4 years ago
I do the same general kind of stuff as piglet - only much much better - and from quite a bit higher.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Yeah? Like WHAT? Tell us what you do.
By the way, to see Hi-res Hasselblad photos of Schmidt with his gold visor raised and his face exposed, reference these frames:
AS17-136-22296
AS17-134-20453
AS17-134-20471
AS17-143-21941
You can add them to your disorganized and irrelevant heap of images on Photobucket.
satweavers 4 years ago
Hi res photos of Jack " geology" Schmidt with his face exposed eh?
Well I'm flattered that someone ( HLAR?) has spent so much searching, just on my say-so. Glad you take me so seriously!
But seriously, Mr Disney, you shouldn't waste our time like this, there are no full face visor-ups anywhere on the Apollo Hassleblads. Only sneak glimpses of 1990s stand-ins.
I dare say you'll soon have this scrap lead of mine up and running on YOUR original little PB, what?
You're such a laugh, really.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Who cares about Schmidt. You have repeatedly made an issue of my career. You have now made careers the prime issue here. Tell us what you do, SkidMark. Tell us why you have the right to feel so thoroughly superior about careers, Mikey. What is your magnificent job description? Be specific and stop avoiding the issue!
satweavers 4 years ago
I see your squealing piglet friend is prodding you to obtain information....
Pass on this message on to him, that any more shenanigans and he faces full and complete public exposure on YouTube.
You've been indoors too long today satters, go out to Montmartre or somewhere. Eat a Paris tart or two...you know, relax.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Your paranoid assertion is a cheap attempt to dodge the question, Skid. From what lofty throne do cast such frothing assertions? Tell us what you do for a living that is so much more noble than the rest of us.
satweavers 4 years ago
What madness makes you impute a person's character onto how they happen to be gainfully employed?
I mean, Hitler was the head of the German state was he not? And many a man of the cloth has been unmasked as a child rapist.
Silliness abounds in your poor mashed-up brain, Sats. You've been too long in the sun without a Capot Anglais on your yank head :)
michaelstmark 4 years ago
Your cowardly dodge reverses the the true issue, Skid, for it is you that impute my character based on my means of gainful employment. I am calling you on this issue and challenge you to explain to everyone how your livelyhood makes you so superior. Tell us how you earn your keep and how that makes you better than the rest of us!
satweavers 4 years ago
But you said you "don't fix the (Disneyworld Paris) rides"! So how have I ever imputed your character upon your exact line of work?
Now trot along, or Micky and Minnie will be wondering where you are today... lol.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
"What madness makes you impute a persons character..." You ask this and continue with the defamation, while avoiding the question? You are a raging, flaming coward, StMark, afraid of divulging your convenience store cashier job, I have to guess, since you are cowering behind your fear of telling us the truth.
I'm not in maintenance
satweavers 4 years ago
And I'm not a cashier. So we're quits, right?
Now quit the premenstrual histrionics and get an early night.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
So that's all it takes? You feel a little put-out and we're done with it? "There are NO images with a visor up". Well, here's four. "They're fake". No effort on your part. Cringe and dodge the issue. Duck and cover. Cower and hide. You hoaxers are spineless and worthless. Enjoy your little sand box.
satweavers 4 years ago
Of the four images you or HLAR have unearthed weeks after my throwing you dogs the lead ( yet again, yaaaaawn ), three of them feature some guy with visor two thirds down and with no identifiable facial features.
In the fourth the visor is only halfway down ( wild applause ) but then we only see part of the forehead and eyebrows of the shy dude within. If you think you can identify someone without seeing the lower two thirds of their face or their eyes, then good luck gumshoe.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
One last question, SkidMark... Do you speak openly and freely at work, without any concern, about your personal beliefs of the varacity of the moon landings? Are you free of any aprehension about your bosses and coworkers knowing your views about this?
I do, and I am.
satweavers 4 years ago
Oh yes, all the time and BIG time, Beavis.
Because I present the Common ScienceTM and the gargantuan Apollo anomalies behind my arguments lucidly and logically.
Look those two words up in the dictionary Satweavers - you missed out somewhere in your education.
michaelstmark 4 years ago
damn, how do people like you think they're so smart, while not contributing anything to mankind at all.
saigonpunkid 4 years ago
then why is there no dust clouds?
johnsmdm 5 years ago
Wow this guy is obviously and quite literally a puppet on a string. I pose this question, With death a certainty if a puncture occurs in the pressurized suit, why is he bouncing and falling with reckless abandon? Is it because he is here on earth? Or is Gene Cernan, A NASA trained astronaut just that stupid?
CaptainUSA 5 years ago
I met Mr. Cernan once and, unlike you, he is NOT stupid. With the benefit of lots of testing and five prior lunar landings, Gene and Jack had a pretty good idea of how much punishment their suits could safely take.
tuttt99 5 years ago
I may be stupid but Still, would you risk it? Not like anybody could help you if it did get punctured. I think most people would be more careful if they were on the surface of the moon 200,000 miles away from the nearest sewing kit.
CaptainUSA 5 years ago
The early astronauts were more careful. But as I said before, the suits were tested to the nth degree. Also there was a lot going on on the moon and thing were pretty exciting so one tended to run about when something interesting happened.
Sorry I called you stupid but you called Gene stupid first (neener neener)
tuttt99 5 years ago
All I'm saying is I wouldn't be running around if it meant that I might die as a result of the real possibility of puncture(however slim you know that there is a chance). 200,000 miles away from help, You'd think everything would be taken very soberly.
CaptainUSA 5 years ago