It seems to me the general public is fed BS in regard to this field.....by design to keep the real knowledge to a selct few lest the masses become too knowledgeable. (about what?)
It seems something is already known to them and it is extroidinary!
@bajajoes1 Okay first, it's "extraordinary." Second, why would the scientific field want to keep "the real knowledge" about astronomy to a select few? Why would the scientific community want to keep the masses ignorant? It's the ignorant masses who love to get on board with crackpot theories like plasma cosmology for seemingly no other reason than they like the idea of a david vs. goliath battle, with the maverick iconoclasts fighting "the man." Come on, friend! Think about it!
If our suns binary star sirius A (Isis) was near us with Sirius B (Osiris) at some stage in the past we would very much be having these discharge displays in the sky as not only would our sun be interacting with it's binary they would both be interacting with the diamond transducer that is Sirius B, The egyptian myths speak to saying that osiris had varying consorts with offspring and that sirius b was segmented by interaction with our sun, perhaps overload where isis then placed us in orbit.
Been working with plasma for 15 years and always wondered why big bangers never had any electrical components to their theories. It has been very obvious to me there is an electrical component to the universe. Besides, I could never buy into gas in a vacuum magically forming a star. This goes against physics. Electrical universe is going the right way. If nothing else, it is honest science and not dogma.
"how does the electric universe change science , what will be the effect"
It won't. It's dead on arrival, since its predictive powers are zero, as it fails to make any quantitative predictions. For instance, it utterly fails to explain the cosmic microwave background radiation.
Why these people keep flogging a dead horse is beyond me. What a waste of time and energy.
I love your examples ending at 4:55. Ember in the sky, then a collapsed dust cloud, atomic furnace, and now a plasma globe [a pinch point].
The farther away they get the fast the particles go is due to the cooling and magnetic changes. As they cool their field grows resulting in repealling them quicker. [?]
Planetary discharges of electrical plasma, to create comets? Come on, that's just plain wrong! How would those discharges occur? From where? Your theory might have a point, but you guys are ruin it with bullshit stuff, and then you ask why people don't take the theory seriously, and they categorize it as pseudo-science!
I'm beginning to think that what "physicists" like to term "fusion" is not "hot" but very cold. Great, now I have to look up a bose-einstein condensate!
Awesome!! I've always been skeptical of the explain-away that astronomers have resorted to, especially with pulsars and neutron stars. Plasma theory just simplifies everything so much. Love it.
search google plasma cosmology and see the blog post "how I know plasma cosmology is wrong".
desspec 1 day ago
It seems to me the general public is fed BS in regard to this field.....by design to keep the real knowledge to a selct few lest the masses become too knowledgeable. (about what?)
It seems something is already known to them and it is extroidinary!
bajajoes1 3 weeks ago
@bajajoes1 Okay first, it's "extraordinary." Second, why would the scientific field want to keep "the real knowledge" about astronomy to a select few? Why would the scientific community want to keep the masses ignorant? It's the ignorant masses who love to get on board with crackpot theories like plasma cosmology for seemingly no other reason than they like the idea of a david vs. goliath battle, with the maverick iconoclasts fighting "the man." Come on, friend! Think about it!
desspec 1 day ago
The words spoken at/after the 6 min. mark seem to me a wonderful verification of TESLA's
research and quest for the Earth to be connected wirelessly by electric energy.
He said the World was not ready to accept him....but he will yet be verified as correct!
bajajoes1 3 weeks ago
@bajajoes1 Tesla has about as much to do with plasma cosmology as I do.
desspec 1 day ago
If our suns binary star sirius A (Isis) was near us with Sirius B (Osiris) at some stage in the past we would very much be having these discharge displays in the sky as not only would our sun be interacting with it's binary they would both be interacting with the diamond transducer that is Sirius B, The egyptian myths speak to saying that osiris had varying consorts with offspring and that sirius b was segmented by interaction with our sun, perhaps overload where isis then placed us in orbit.
MrCryospark 2 months ago
Been working with plasma for 15 years and always wondered why big bangers never had any electrical components to their theories. It has been very obvious to me there is an electrical component to the universe. Besides, I could never buy into gas in a vacuum magically forming a star. This goes against physics. Electrical universe is going the right way. If nothing else, it is honest science and not dogma.
nodice4me 3 months ago
@nodice4me how does the electric universe change science , what will be the effect
bestinfadel 3 months ago
@bestinfadel
"how does the electric universe change science , what will be the effect"
It won't. It's dead on arrival, since its predictive powers are zero, as it fails to make any quantitative predictions. For instance, it utterly fails to explain the cosmic microwave background radiation.
Why these people keep flogging a dead horse is beyond me. What a waste of time and energy.
MomoTheBellyDancer 2 months ago
I love your examples ending at 4:55. Ember in the sky, then a collapsed dust cloud, atomic furnace, and now a plasma globe [a pinch point].
The farther away they get the fast the particles go is due to the cooling and magnetic changes. As they cool their field grows resulting in repealling them quicker. [?]
SlackerSlayer 4 months ago
@SlackerSlayer sry, repelling.
SlackerSlayer 4 months ago
Planetary discharges of electrical plasma, to create comets? Come on, that's just plain wrong! How would those discharges occur? From where? Your theory might have a point, but you guys are ruin it with bullshit stuff, and then you ask why people don't take the theory seriously, and they categorize it as pseudo-science!
danielbluesmoke 4 months ago
I'm beginning to think that what "physicists" like to term "fusion" is not "hot" but very cold. Great, now I have to look up a bose-einstein condensate!
wavyinfinity 5 months ago
Awesome!! I've always been skeptical of the explain-away that astronomers have resorted to, especially with pulsars and neutron stars. Plasma theory just simplifies everything so much. Love it.
nictheman144 6 months ago
Im floored. I took astronomy (2 courses) and never heard any of this.
destroistheduke 1 year ago
@destroistheduke, it blew my hair back as well. Glad you enjoyed it.
LeagueOfWisdom 1 year ago
@destroistheduke That's because it's nonsense and has nothing to do with astronomy.
desspec 1 day ago
The BBT is just a bunch of names for the same two things
Aspanaut 1 year ago