Wix’s Tuner Directory. Has Tons of high quality low cost auto parts for any car. They have special discounts and links to sites that have a lot of car parts at low prices and its totally free.
Just type "Wixs tuner Directory" into Google to go to site
on another note, i have a 95 prelude vtec and mine can hit 160. You just need valve springs to get there red line is at 7200 @ 8k rpms hits 160mph. Tried it once and that enough for me.
Oh and its not safe obviously, need a flat flat road lol especially for a muscle car with a poor suspension better have good shokcs springs etc cus it aint the same at 150 lol
@karsseboomh22 acually i built a couple civics with h22's. if you use the accord r tranny, which has longer gears than the lsd prelude s, you can achieve 160 at 8200 rpm with 215/40/16. so yes, there is no way it would do it stock, even if power wasnt an issue
on another note, i have a 95 prelude vtec and mine can hit 160. You just need valve springs to get there red line is at 7200 @ 8k rpms hits 160mph. Tried it once and that enough for me.
Are they electronically limited to that speed or what?
Also, a four banger in turbo territory? The S2000 is awesome. Needs a supercharger or a V6 six option to those of us who dont like the putt putt sounds lol.
lol by the time i hit 125 in mine i always hit some sort of traffic, then i get down to 60, traffic clears up, hit 125, traffic again, i guess im just unlucky....
I see all these stories about people weaving the stock S2000 at speeds close to 140mph?? Well... I actually have a friend who has a BONE stock AP1 and i've personally been in his car when he was weaving at 138mph... and the car was totally solid. It's amazing what a good driver can do for that car WITHOUT a full suspension. FYI... the S2000's stock suspension setup is pretty unbeatable.
i have an AP1 myself and oddly enough i agree melinko, no way can you dip with a bike at 140. maybe if ure boosted with a full suspension then yea (like me) lol. but thats too dangerous, i like smokin V8's much better :)
@JOHNGO... I had a witness in the car... this is not a lie... I outweaved a motorcycle in moderate to heavy traffic at about 140mph... believe it or not...that is your problem.... it 100% happened... Just because you own the car doesnt mean you are capable of replicating the same skills as another driver.... get real dude.
im sure you did, remember this isnt a dream man, its real life. going 140 isnt exactly a skill, any moron can step on a gas pedal. i think you are the one who should get real "dude". being to tell a b/s story from a fact is not a problem either, its common sense. Just so you know in case you misunderstood the first time im not doubting that an s2k can do that speed, just the fact that you say your boy out dipped a motorcycle is dumb. no stock s2k can do that i promise you.
JOHNGO----- whatever you say. You actually think your word is the FINAL word? If you do, you're fkn crazy. Since you cannot disprove or approve my statement, stop running your mouth like shit is flowing out.
sure i can disprove, ask any stock s2k owner if they can dip on a bike at 140. go ahead ask, and if they say yes they're lying too. my friends new M5 barely keeps up with bikes man, get your shit straight. i dont doubt it can do that speed at all cause everyone knows it can. im only runnin my mouth to disprove your LIE, so just stop. no one cares about your fake story.
@JOHNGO.. Are you aware of the rules of logic? Do you realize you are breaking every rule that every determined logic as well as its ugly brother, circular logic? Apparently, you are not bright enough to construct a valid path of reasoning in your feeble attempt to disprove me. Once again, since you cannot, on ANY logical platform, prove me wrong, please shut your fkn mouth. The genesis of your argument is one that is flawed and furthermore, your poor education is surfacing with each rebuttal
@JOHNGO... ask yourself this: 1) What is the skill level of the individual I am speaking with and what are the skill levels of the drivers you're addressing 2) What kind of highway was it....double lane, triple lane.. 3) What were the enviornmental conditions on that day 4) Is it because my friends own s2000's and one has an M5, that it means they are not capable of doing what "i've" done, so it's impossible?? THATS THE GUTS OR YOUR ARGUMENT.. FLAWED LOGIC.
@JOHNGO-- until you can construct a VALID argument..leave me the fk alone... you're dumber than shit..and that tiny brain of yours needs serious education--SERIOUS. Got education???
must have been a bicycle, theres ure logic tough guy lmao. ppl like you make me laugh. write a fuckin book to try to sound smart on youtube. get a life man.
@dividebyzero... IF YOU SAY SO CLOWN.... you cannot refute my statements, because you were not there. IT HAPPENED...and it happened with my buddy in the passenger seat. I could care less if you believe it... You're probably just a shitty driver.
my '02 stock took me to 147mph once, TOP DOWN......was your canvas up or down on this drive? :D
The only reason I resumed "normal" speed was due the fact I was passing highway traffic at about double their speed & I became nervous that someone might cut me off. I've always wondered how many more mph's I could've pulled. Smooth as silk all the way to where I was; great feeling. Next exit was State Police...*sigh*
Great and highly-addictive car....even moreso in the twisties and hills! :D
no, top was definitely UP and closed. I tried with top down (road was bumpy though) and only could get 135mph or so.. never tried with top down on a super flat road.
2002 is one of the best years for the S2000. From the 99-01, the improved the trans, the suspension, the interior, the back window got changed to glass with a rear defroster, and a few other tweeks cosmetically. 2003 copied 2002 and 2004 began with the F22C, which decreased the redline but improved the lower end torque. Personally, the Ap1 can take the Ap2, its truly a drivers race.
next time try for top speed on less fuel! a full tank of gas is heavy! try it with a few gallons in the tank and you should have more acceleration on the top end
If you don't run out of fuel! I've done this in my S2K, same year as this one, and let me tell you it drinks gas like crazy. I'd never attempt top speed in my S2K without filling up first.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
are you sure? cause the s2000 that was made in 1999 or watever had the f20c engine that revved to 10k rpm. This one is 9k rpm which means it's an F22c engine which was made after 2004 or something.
@racerboyroy No, the motor isn't bigger. The pistons are shorter, which in turn gives it more displacement. Technically, by switching the pistons and crankshaft an AP1 could become an AP2. 2.2L displacement with 9000 revs. You might run into valve slapping problems or such.
@segovian my buddy bought an AP2 bottom cause he blew some parts in his bottom end and he slapped on his AP1 top and the shop bought some new AP2 parts and now it has the ability to keep the revs high and gots some low end torque. i wanna do that too :)
I have an S2000 and actually enjoy sitting in traffic for the first time in my life..... Its all about the ride, nothing else. Just get what you like and enjoy it. It doesn't matter what it is as long as you like it.
@Jetspeedz no true gear head in the world will talk shit about an s2k, one of the n=best cars Honda has ever made, most powerful 4cyl ever, annnnd she LOVES boost.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
dont get me wrong, i do see your point. on a racetrack all three cars are about the same.(actually the s200 is the fastest) But on the street, in traffic, the 350Z has more low end HP. Stuff i actually feel at low speeds. I have driven both an s2000 and an RX8 two high revving screamers, but you have to admit, they feel like civics under 5000 RPM.
LOL--he said "he enjoyed sitting in traffic with the car" HE DID NOT SAY--he purchased the car to sit in traffic. Not so sure why everyone gave you a thumbs up--- what you said was pretty much pointless.
WHODAMANME: MOST people with sportscars cannot control when or if they hit traffic. Of course sports cars are not meant for traffic, but I saw a ferrari in traffic the other day; shit happens.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
show me a video where the s2000 beat a 350z around a track.... not happening its been tested many times even tho the s2k is alot lighter it just doesnt have the power.
yeah thats how I explain my car to people. I tell them its like a civic under 6 grand but after that it just hauls. 4.77s helped with low end tho too.
First off I would like to point out that I have 2 cars.. Honda 2001 S2000 Turbo and a Stock 2006 Corvette Z06.. When I first got the Honda s2000 6 months ago.. which I got for driving around.. I test drove the new s2k.. I felt that they are very powerless.. However.. They are nice looking.. Also.. I would like to say thank for for putting this video up.. It's the best top speed video I have seen.
Its acually only in the US that the ap2 red lines at 8,000rpm. Europe n Japan they have the same 2.2L engine on the ap2 which red lines at 9,000rpm. You can thank americans car regulations for not being able to pull that extra 1,000 rpm...
@earliozz the ap1's [1999-2003] have the f20 (2.0) that redlines round 9+ the ap2 [2004-2009] f22 redlines at like 8,300...and the ap2 has stabilty control and roll bar speakers just some info on these little beasts
@xxnissansilviaxx auhh, Tell me more please whats better ap1 or ap2? Does 9rpm makes a differents from the 8000rpm one? Sorry for so much question but I like to know more about these bad boys..
hey "philipp122", your wrong... if you read the description it tells you that its an s2000 from the first year (its a 2000 year model) and from 2000-2003 was the first and best generation ever made and if you know anything about the s2k's then you should know the first gen came with the 2.0 not the 2.2 and the 2.0 redlines at 9200 rpm instead of 8500rpm like the 2.2 does.
thats hawt man, im glad to see that at least one honda goes above 140 haha. Anyway, i might be switching from my 390whp sti to an s2000. It was i originally wanted and now im getting bored with the sti. Rep for the fast mph
hah, hey roy.. it's me Chris the driver of the s2000 in that video. i had an Xgirlfriend holding the camera. she was brave - shoulda kept her around a little longer :)
oh. and the clutch/transmission fried after that run. i helped discover the problem with the 1-2 grind that got worse with higher speed runs when the gears weren't lubericated enough.
I bet that mid 14s preformnce is blowing away modern v6 sedens, even racecar drivers dont go that fast on public roads, reason is because a racetracks roads are way diffrent and those are for twisties not straightline
14 seconds out of a 2.2 liter 4 cylinder car is amazing. They're really pretty quick. The F22C engine under the car's hood currently makes more n/a ponies than any other car in production, with a total of over 120 n/a horsepower per liter. That brings it to a total of about 246 horsepower.
True, it does have smaller displacement, but only because of the engine design. The engine is actually less fuel efficient and doesn't have any more potential. Also, VTEC isn't what's unique about Honda's engines. It's not what gives it its power. VTEC is simply a mechanism that allows both economic driving at cruising speeds and sport driving when you punch the gas. The F22C makes all of its power solely from its ingenious design,
Also that 1.3 liter isn't actually a 1.3L. Because if displacement is how much air per revolution it's more than a 1.3 liter, mazda only rated one stroke, but it rotates 3 times per revolution. which is why Mazda can't use rotaries in races anymore, because it's way too easy to lie about the displacement. That eninges more of a 2.6 liter.
roy (who posted this video) was behind me in his Camaro .. forgot specs but he'd always win 20mph - 80mph.. but i think i could keep distance if not make a few car lengths from 90ish to 155ish..
yeah above 100mph the honda was just as fast i guess it was more aero - my flipup rear spoiler and huge (non functional at the time) air scoop on the hood didnt help
to slow stock! exactly how fast do you think your average car goes stock? these are sub 6 seconds and more importantly for me, look stunning! ive only had mine a week cant stop the grin every time i push the button!
the s2000 is a roadster but can be used as a sports car
snarfeater 2 months ago
its WEAK, it takes along time to get to 153mph so i got bored. what happen to the HP, did it die. GARBAGE HP it has
js42021 4 months ago
@js42021 and your sedan goes 110? stfu
SikedChiken 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ap1 right? i hit 165mph with one.
ikeepzitclean 5 months ago
Comment removed
ikeepzitclean 5 months ago
my dad had that car
moviemyles100 6 months ago
uhuh lemme see out the window, i bet youre on jackstands in your driveway :D
Umayrkaleem 7 months ago
Wix’s Tuner Directory. Has Tons of high quality low cost auto parts for any car. They have special discounts and links to sites that have a lot of car parts at low prices and its totally free.
Just type "Wixs tuner Directory" into Google to go to site
wixtunerdirectory 8 months ago
@PythonTechnology, its not a "v4" its an inline 4.
on another note, i have a 95 prelude vtec and mine can hit 160. You just need valve springs to get there red line is at 7200 @ 8k rpms hits 160mph. Tried it once and that enough for me.
Oh and its not safe obviously, need a flat flat road lol especially for a muscle car with a poor suspension better have good shokcs springs etc cus it aint the same at 150 lol
AbrahamLopezSJ 10 months ago
@AbrahamLopezSJ no way your stock prelude hit 160. I have had many vtec preludes and they dont hit 160. The s2000 is a way faster car
karsseboomh22 8 months ago
@karsseboomh22 acually i built a couple civics with h22's. if you use the accord r tranny, which has longer gears than the lsd prelude s, you can achieve 160 at 8200 rpm with 215/40/16. so yes, there is no way it would do it stock, even if power wasnt an issue
evilevo420 5 months ago
@PythonTechnology, its not a "v4" its an inline 4.
on another note, i have a 95 prelude vtec and mine can hit 160. You just need valve springs to get there red line is at 7200 @ 8k rpms hits 160mph. Tried it once and that enough for me.
AbrahamLopezSJ 10 months ago
Are they electronically limited to that speed or what?
Also, a four banger in turbo territory? The S2000 is awesome. Needs a supercharger or a V6 six option to those of us who dont like the putt putt sounds lol.
peepeevagi 10 months ago
got my old 95 impala ss up to 151 it was awsome
bergaflickal 1 year ago
@bergaflickal yeah but your car is a v8...5.7L??? this is 4banger 2L....s2k is amazing for what its got
Maniakq1 11 months ago
I've got an old Chevy truck with a 350 motor in it. Isn't worth more than 2k, and it's ooooooold. Easily hits 160 lol.
My deal is better than the S2000's. Though i dont win in the end though. Seven miles to the gallon >.>
peepeevagi 10 months ago
@peepeevagi 160km's maybe and thats even pushing it
Zanidean9 7 months ago
@Zanidean9 160mph son. Needle going back around and past the Zero :D
peepeevagi 7 months ago
lol by the time i hit 125 in mine i always hit some sort of traffic, then i get down to 60, traffic clears up, hit 125, traffic again, i guess im just unlucky....
bastec666 1 year ago
I wouldn't love my S2000 any less if it could only go 125. That's fast enough for me! Cool vid though.
glennkrueger 1 year ago
wow ima sound like a punk but i have not taking mine past 120 and i dont think i dare to
epich100 1 year ago
That's crazy. I didn't know the AP1 had a higher top speed than an AP2? I've taken my AP2 to 148 twice, but read they are limited to 150.
1ruffryder1 1 year ago
1999 s2000 epicc wat color
xxnissansilviaxx 1 year ago
@johngo and @scorpios. Lol both of u get a life and quit arguing over a fucken video on YouTube. You both r just so cool. :D
S2kownerha 1 year ago
less than 7k miles on the car...wonder how long it was before he totaled it..lol
jeffkugel 1 year ago
I see all these stories about people weaving the stock S2000 at speeds close to 140mph?? Well... I actually have a friend who has a BONE stock AP1 and i've personally been in his car when he was weaving at 138mph... and the car was totally solid. It's amazing what a good driver can do for that car WITHOUT a full suspension. FYI... the S2000's stock suspension setup is pretty unbeatable.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
i have an AP1 myself and oddly enough i agree melinko, no way can you dip with a bike at 140. maybe if ure boosted with a full suspension then yea (like me) lol. but thats too dangerous, i like smokin V8's much better :)
johngo1224 2 years ago
@JOHNGO... I had a witness in the car... this is not a lie... I outweaved a motorcycle in moderate to heavy traffic at about 140mph... believe it or not...that is your problem.... it 100% happened... Just because you own the car doesnt mean you are capable of replicating the same skills as another driver.... get real dude.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
im sure you did, remember this isnt a dream man, its real life. going 140 isnt exactly a skill, any moron can step on a gas pedal. i think you are the one who should get real "dude". being to tell a b/s story from a fact is not a problem either, its common sense. Just so you know in case you misunderstood the first time im not doubting that an s2k can do that speed, just the fact that you say your boy out dipped a motorcycle is dumb. no stock s2k can do that i promise you.
johngo1224 2 years ago
JOHNGO----- whatever you say. You actually think your word is the FINAL word? If you do, you're fkn crazy. Since you cannot disprove or approve my statement, stop running your mouth like shit is flowing out.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
sure i can disprove, ask any stock s2k owner if they can dip on a bike at 140. go ahead ask, and if they say yes they're lying too. my friends new M5 barely keeps up with bikes man, get your shit straight. i dont doubt it can do that speed at all cause everyone knows it can. im only runnin my mouth to disprove your LIE, so just stop. no one cares about your fake story.
johngo1224 2 years ago
@JOHNGO.. Are you aware of the rules of logic? Do you realize you are breaking every rule that every determined logic as well as its ugly brother, circular logic? Apparently, you are not bright enough to construct a valid path of reasoning in your feeble attempt to disprove me. Once again, since you cannot, on ANY logical platform, prove me wrong, please shut your fkn mouth. The genesis of your argument is one that is flawed and furthermore, your poor education is surfacing with each rebuttal
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
@JOHNGO... ask yourself this: 1) What is the skill level of the individual I am speaking with and what are the skill levels of the drivers you're addressing 2) What kind of highway was it....double lane, triple lane.. 3) What were the enviornmental conditions on that day 4) Is it because my friends own s2000's and one has an M5, that it means they are not capable of doing what "i've" done, so it's impossible?? THATS THE GUTS OR YOUR ARGUMENT.. FLAWED LOGIC.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
@JOHNGO-- until you can construct a VALID argument..leave me the fk alone... you're dumber than shit..and that tiny brain of yours needs serious education--SERIOUS. Got education???
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
must have been a bicycle, theres ure logic tough guy lmao. ppl like you make me laugh. write a fuckin book to try to sound smart on youtube. get a life man.
johngo1224 2 years ago
@johngo... That's what I thought. Have a good day.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
I have a 2000, s2000 and ive taken it up to that speed. Bone stock. sick lol
s2krexx 2 years ago
( Youngbleeb ) the top speed of a stock honda nsx is 168mph...
your comment FAIL!!!!!
arrancooper69 2 years ago
This video goes to show ALL YOU HATERS that the S2000 WILL go over 140mph. The cars as real as it gets for a 2.0 liter, 4.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
MusikIsMuhLyfe 2 years ago
@ScorpiosRevenge1 Our Diesel BMW 120d M Sport will do over 140Mph, what's your point?
DivideBYZero69 2 years ago
@ScorpiosRevenge1 of course it goes over 140, my gc can go 140 lol
serb07 2 months ago
stock?
gangstermac9 2 years ago
you weaved motorcycles? lol thats right before they smoked your ass right? LMFAO
melinko0662 2 years ago
The Ap1 is a GREAT CAR-- I own myself and have out weaved motorcycles at 140mph.... cars VERY VERY capable IF you know how to drive.
AP1FORLIFE 2 years ago
@AP1FORLIFE Unless you were actually weaving a basket, you're full of shit.
DivideBYZero69 2 years ago
@dividebyzero... IF YOU SAY SO CLOWN.... you cannot refute my statements, because you were not there. IT HAPPENED...and it happened with my buddy in the passenger seat. I could care less if you believe it... You're probably just a shitty driver.
ScorpiosRevenge1 2 years ago
The shitty driver is the one weaving @140Mph in heavy traffic.
DivideBYZero69 1 year ago
top up on mine ... 155mph.. couldn't rev my 5th gear anymore.
freddy4sure 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol. this video is a)old b)shot running downhill. Nice try though... like any stock honda will do 153MPH, esp. a F20C
youngbleeb 2 years ago
The max I ever pushed my AP1 was 145..on an interstate..ofourse top down... I could have pushed 5mph more.. but its too risky on these roads..
acv318 2 years ago
i cant wait to get my ap2 :)
TheLateRiser 2 years ago
my '02 stock took me to 147mph once, TOP DOWN......was your canvas up or down on this drive? :D
The only reason I resumed "normal" speed was due the fact I was passing highway traffic at about double their speed & I became nervous that someone might cut me off. I've always wondered how many more mph's I could've pulled. Smooth as silk all the way to where I was; great feeling. Next exit was State Police...*sigh*
Great and highly-addictive car....even moreso in the twisties and hills! :D
jcambassador7 2 years ago
no, top was definitely UP and closed. I tried with top down (road was bumpy though) and only could get 135mph or so.. never tried with top down on a super flat road.
drivefast617 2 years ago
For me, the instrumentation looks better than the Ap2.
Banj95 3 years ago
2002 is one of the best years for the S2000. From the 99-01, the improved the trans, the suspension, the interior, the back window got changed to glass with a rear defroster, and a few other tweeks cosmetically. 2003 copied 2002 and 2004 began with the F22C, which decreased the redline but improved the lower end torque. Personally, the Ap1 can take the Ap2, its truly a drivers race.
AP1FORLIFE 3 years ago
Ive got an 02 Ap1 and have gone 140+, completely stable. For a NA 4 cylinder, cars amazing. How many NA 4 cylinders can claim 120hp per liter?
AP1FORLIFE 3 years ago
I think that has the highest power-displacement ratio. For a turbocharged four, I think it's the Mitsubishi Evo X, 150 per liter.
Banj95 3 years ago
next time try for top speed on less fuel! a full tank of gas is heavy! try it with a few gallons in the tank and you should have more acceleration on the top end
mattfra1 3 years ago
If you don't run out of fuel! I've done this in my S2K, same year as this one, and let me tell you it drinks gas like crazy. I'd never attempt top speed in my S2K without filling up first.
IntelEngineer1 3 years ago
try it with a 1/4 tank and you will see a big improvement!
mattfra1 3 years ago 4
props on your s2k but this is no big accomplishment! i hit 160 in a stock 01 lude sh
mattfra1 3 years ago
I hope that wasn't you holding the camera.
whitefangv 3 years ago
no, it wasn't me holding the camera.. it was my X-girlfriend holding the camera.
drivefast617 3 years ago
wow, it also shows mph?
sio77nvd4 3 years ago
sheesh.. is that stock?
nukefivesix 3 years ago
the car was bone stock less than 6 months old it was the first year they made it 1999 i think
racerboyroy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you sure? cause the s2000 that was made in 1999 or watever had the f20c engine that revved to 10k rpm. This one is 9k rpm which means it's an F22c engine which was made after 2004 or something.
yourmotherrules 3 years ago
no the F20C revs to 9k rpm. the F22 revs to 8k. or 8300rpm.
donisthabomb1 3 years ago 2
oh crap really? Damn... my bad, i really thought it could rev to 10k. Thanks.
yourmotherrules 3 years ago
@racerboyroy No, the motor isn't bigger. The pistons are shorter, which in turn gives it more displacement. Technically, by switching the pistons and crankshaft an AP1 could become an AP2. 2.2L displacement with 9000 revs. You might run into valve slapping problems or such.
segovian 1 year ago
@segovian my buddy bought an AP2 bottom cause he blew some parts in his bottom end and he slapped on his AP1 top and the shop bought some new AP2 parts and now it has the ability to keep the revs high and gots some low end torque. i wanna do that too :)
XxxXVick 1 year ago
I have an S2000 and actually enjoy sitting in traffic for the first time in my life..... Its all about the ride, nothing else. Just get what you like and enjoy it. It doesn't matter what it is as long as you like it.
Jetspeedz 3 years ago 27
@Jetspeedz seats are so comfortbale i dont blame u
xxnissansilviaxx 1 year ago
@Jetspeedz
I definitely agree. Since I git my S, Traffic has not been as bothersome.
japgamer00x 1 year ago
@Jetspeedz What are they like to drive normally i.e outside vtec are they still quicker than your average car?
AndrewStrang 1 year ago
@Jetspeedz no true gear head in the world will talk shit about an s2k, one of the n=best cars Honda has ever made, most powerful 4cyl ever, annnnd she LOVES boost.
adampope64 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i hate the s2000 just as much as the rx-8. overpriced cars you rev so high, yet have no power.
carl2tan 3 years ago
lol what do you drive?
WhoDaManMe 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
06 350Z coupe, 300 hp is better than those other two 239 hp 9000rpm cars.
carl2tan 3 years ago
well it may have 300hp but it as fun to drive in the twisties :) as the S2000
WhoDaManMe 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont get me wrong, i do see your point. on a racetrack all three cars are about the same.(actually the s200 is the fastest) But on the street, in traffic, the 350Z has more low end HP. Stuff i actually feel at low speeds. I have driven both an s2000 and an RX8 two high revving screamers, but you have to admit, they feel like civics under 5000 RPM.
carl2tan 3 years ago
I see your point also but most people dont get sports cars to sit in traffic.
WhoDaManMe 3 years ago 26
LOL--he said "he enjoyed sitting in traffic with the car" HE DID NOT SAY--he purchased the car to sit in traffic. Not so sure why everyone gave you a thumbs up--- what you said was pretty much pointless.
AP1FORLIFE 3 years ago
NEXT TIME! look at the correct post before you post something. Maybe that way you'll be able to understand why something is the way it is!
WhoDaManMe 3 years ago
lol.....................................
AP1FORLIFE 3 years ago
WHODAMANME: MOST people with sportscars cannot control when or if they hit traffic. Of course sports cars are not meant for traffic, but I saw a ferrari in traffic the other day; shit happens.
AP1FORLIFE 3 years ago
Look dont try to save face now by bringing it up a different way, and also I'm done talking about a 4 month old comment
WhoDaManMe 3 years ago
@WhoDaManMe hondas aren't sports cars ; )
pac850 6 months ago
@pac850 s2000, nsx.... really? its easy to spot the people on youtube who dont know jack shit about cars.
evilevo420 5 months ago
Comment removed
GvonX 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evilevo420 s2k, NSX,...... uhm anything else? nope unless you call your econobox civic a sports car
GvonX 1 month ago
@pac850 s2000 hsv si and tipe R are sport cars ; D
itzzEric2 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
show me a video where the s2000 beat a 350z around a track.... not happening its been tested many times even tho the s2k is alot lighter it just doesnt have the power.
drift300zx 3 years ago
yeah thats how I explain my car to people. I tell them its like a civic under 6 grand but after that it just hauls. 4.77s helped with low end tho too.
FastisFast 3 years ago
I've done 143mph but my girl started complaining so I had to let off... :( I know I can get to like 155mph
HONDAKING01 3 years ago
I've gone 148, but cars began joining me on what was an empty freeway at first, so I slowed down.
UmarS2000 3 years ago
The F22 has a longer stroke and does not need to be reved over 8500.
dlb83082 3 years ago 2
First off I would like to point out that I have 2 cars.. Honda 2001 S2000 Turbo and a Stock 2006 Corvette Z06.. When I first got the Honda s2000 6 months ago.. which I got for driving around.. I test drove the new s2k.. I felt that they are very powerless.. However.. They are nice looking.. Also.. I would like to say thank for for putting this video up.. It's the best top speed video I have seen.
LLM2236 3 years ago
the engine doesn't come alive until you rev it to about 7000, which is where it gets serious
Pageofzep 3 years ago
I've only done 133 :( too scared to go any faster on my stock red 01
rickjaruiz 3 years ago
she's still got a 1000 revs left, find a hill.
stunludez03 3 years ago
lol
turbulentmotorsports 3 years ago
r u kidding me dude da s2000 rapes da rx8 put dem up stock stock ull c the results i no frm experiance i have a s2000 my self
2pure 3 years ago
why do the earlier s2000's have a 9000 rpm red line, while the newer versions have an 8000 rpm red line?
earliozz 3 years ago
the newer cars have a bigger motor
racerboyroy 3 years ago 2
Its acually only in the US that the ap2 red lines at 8,000rpm. Europe n Japan they have the same 2.2L engine on the ap2 which red lines at 9,000rpm. You can thank americans car regulations for not being able to pull that extra 1,000 rpm...
kiap 3 years ago
@racerboyroy 2.2 right?
returnofdaking 10 months ago
@returnofdaking Yes I think so - it was the first year it was made
racerboyroy 9 months ago
@earliozz the ap1's [1999-2003] have the f20 (2.0) that redlines round 9+ the ap2 [2004-2009] f22 redlines at like 8,300...and the ap2 has stabilty control and roll bar speakers just some info on these little beasts
xxnissansilviaxx 1 year ago 3
@xxnissansilviaxx auhh, Tell me more please whats better ap1 or ap2? Does 9rpm makes a differents from the 8000rpm one? Sorry for so much question but I like to know more about these bad boys..
richguev 1 year ago
@earliozz older ones are 2L v4, the newer ones are 2.2L v4.
PythonTechnology 10 months ago
mid 14s is ok its no diffrent than rx8 in hp and speed altho still fun car
jayguy173 3 years ago
hey "philipp122", your wrong... if you read the description it tells you that its an s2000 from the first year (its a 2000 year model) and from 2000-2003 was the first and best generation ever made and if you know anything about the s2k's then you should know the first gen came with the 2.0 not the 2.2 and the 2.0 redlines at 9200 rpm instead of 8500rpm like the 2.2 does.
th3kingofsling 3 years ago
Not to shabby, but you want to try my S/C version 170+
siouxsteve 4 years ago
thats hawt man, im glad to see that at least one honda goes above 140 haha. Anyway, i might be switching from my 390whp sti to an s2000. It was i originally wanted and now im getting bored with the sti. Rep for the fast mph
stiscoobie 4 years ago
are those actual miles on the odo?
this things still a baby!
Mario0401 4 years ago
yes it had few miles on it
my friend chris
got one of the first cars in this area
i think it was a 1999 model - the first year it was made
racerboyroy 4 years ago
hah, hey roy.. it's me Chris the driver of the s2000 in that video. i had an Xgirlfriend holding the camera. she was brave - shoulda kept her around a little longer :)
oh. and the clutch/transmission fried after that run. i helped discover the problem with the 1-2 grind that got worse with higher speed runs when the gears weren't lubericated enough.
drivefast617 4 years ago
cool good to hear from you chris
i knew early models had transmission troubles
but i didnt remember your car had had problems
that was a fun car to drive
racerboyroy 4 years ago
it could go faster
onesexys2k 4 years ago
they all want 2 know that your the fast n the furius
jayguys173 4 years ago
How much % from real for your digital tacho?
did you have approx.8000 rpm in VI gear I guess...Thx.
indigoblue555 4 years ago
I bet that mid 14s preformnce is blowing away modern v6 sedens, even racecar drivers dont go that fast on public roads, reason is because a racetracks roads are way diffrent and those are for twisties not straightline
jayguys173 4 years ago
^^ these guys are all about straight line performance, buy a freak'n camaro. you get an s2k for the twisties BIATCH
db17k 4 years ago
agreed
rocrfella 4 years ago
14 seconds out of a 2.2 liter 4 cylinder car is amazing. They're really pretty quick. The F22C engine under the car's hood currently makes more n/a ponies than any other car in production, with a total of over 120 n/a horsepower per liter. That brings it to a total of about 246 horsepower.
philipp122 4 years ago
how bout a 1.3 liter that makes 232 hp stock NA...thats 180 hp per liter...BEAT THAT VTECH...ROTARY POWER FTW
chancejat 4 years ago
True, it does have smaller displacement, but only because of the engine design. The engine is actually less fuel efficient and doesn't have any more potential. Also, VTEC isn't what's unique about Honda's engines. It's not what gives it its power. VTEC is simply a mechanism that allows both economic driving at cruising speeds and sport driving when you punch the gas. The F22C makes all of its power solely from its ingenious design,
philipp122 4 years ago 2
Also that 1.3 liter isn't actually a 1.3L. Because if displacement is how much air per revolution it's more than a 1.3 liter, mazda only rated one stroke, but it rotates 3 times per revolution. which is why Mazda can't use rotaries in races anymore, because it's way too easy to lie about the displacement. That eninges more of a 2.6 liter.
koukicrisp 4 years ago 3
roy (who posted this video) was behind me in his Camaro .. forgot specs but he'd always win 20mph - 80mph.. but i think i could keep distance if not make a few car lengths from 90ish to 155ish..
roy - you'd remember better than me..
drivefast617 3 years ago
yeah above 100mph the honda was just as fast i guess it was more aero - my flipup rear spoiler and huge (non functional at the time) air scoop on the hood didnt help
racerboyroy 3 years ago
Who cares - it is a blast to drive one - it's like a RWD car with a motorcycle motor in it!
dlb83082 4 years ago 2
not that bad stock with a couple of modds, but when i went turbo ill never go back its amazing turboed
s2khondas 4 years ago
to slow stock! exactly how fast do you think your average car goes stock? these are sub 6 seconds and more importantly for me, look stunning! ive only had mine a week cant stop the grin every time i push the button!
dombertone 4 years ago
lol ya they are. My friend has an S2000, and he took me for a ride in it. I can't believe he wasted 33k on one.
mcromance1 4 years ago
it drives like a race car - you havent driven one you have not driven it fasr enough
racerboyroy 4 years ago
buy a turbo kit for that S2000 man, they're to slow stock =(
andresc586 4 years ago
no their not.....
xxtrustxx 4 years ago
153MPH IS PRETTY DAMN FAST, JUST FYI.
TheSystemIsFlawed 4 years ago 2
I'm not talking about top speed, you're an idiot...just FYI
mcromance1 4 years ago