The top two comments are addressing the same issue that he is talking about, however they are jumping to conclusion just like he described. They assume he is pissed off at the interviewer for turning around his words, because of the cut to his face after the comment and since you don't get a follow up it is left as that.
I'm a little confused about this negativity towards Hitchcock and how Griffith and Eisenstein founded these principles. Did you not hear him: "Which Griffith invented, it's true." He knows what's become before him. Just because he wasn't part of the initial founding creators of cinema doesn't mean his work is invalid or not progressive. Look at his body of work. He's incredible. I watched "Psycho" for the first time a week ago and could not take my eyes from the screen. The control.
Damn I'm learning more watching interviews with Hitchcock than I have from years of studying other sources. Truly the master, not only of suspense, but of cinema.
@brassmonkeyjew: uhhh if ur implying that U don't for those particular reasons, then that's stupid. Older movies actually have class and DO make sense if u have a brain when you watch them. Hello? Hitchcock? Casablanca? Streetcar Named Desire? What planet do u come from??
"in the first place we had in it the murder of a woman, of a nude woman. as you know, you could not take the camera of a nude woman ........................... being stabbed to death." LOL
@MrDrHAZjr Honestly, I think the video was just cut after the interviewer asked the question, to a random shot of Hitchcock. If however, it's un-editted, god damn that's funny. The 'Cock was a strange and powerful being.
@brassmonkeyjew You are missing the entire purpose of this video. PURE CINEMA. Using cinematic technique to manipulate the audiences emotion. He was a master of the craft and at explaining it in a simple way. Please do not compare his films to the Gorefest that is Saw. Saw was entertaining, but the only emotion I got from it was "god, I hope that never happens to me. That would suck"
@brassmonkeyjew This is honestly hard to respond to. "No one watches old movies cause they are dated and don't make sense anymore cause they are from a time which has passed." Are you serious? There are so many things wrong with that sentence. In terms of grammar and accuracy. Believe it or not, a lot of people still watch old movies. I have so much more to say but I can already tell it will be a waste of my time.
@brassmonkeyjew you are a genuine moron, I am not joking, if you honestly believe what you just typed, you are systematically by all of society's intellectual standards a truly dumb person
The title should not say "Hitchcock explains about cutting": we don't explain about things, we explain things. Thus, the title should say "Hitchcock explains cutting." There you are.
That was the kuleshov experiment, not the alfred hitchcock experiment. You can call hitchcock a genius, but just remember who explored these ideas in the first place: Eisenstein, Kuleshov, D.W. Griffith, Pudovkin. Alfred Hitchcock only mastered the techniques that filmmakers had already invented.
This is not quite correct, the way hitchcock manage to build tension in his movies was never seen before. yeah tough, for the last part he refers to kulesov experiment, but his movies are full of brand new ways of cinecrafting
Now lets replace the woman in the bikini with an interviewer saying ""or you for it, as it were" and change the shot of a smile, to a frown. Now we a really angry man. lol. All jokes aside hitchcock was a legend.
@CraigKramer That's the same way I took it. The other thing to keep in mind is that the last shot might not have actually been a reaction to the interviewer's comment. It's unlikely this was done with two cameras. They do the interview with the camera trained on Hitch, then later shoot the interviewer whose shot may or may not have even been in the same room as the actual interview or even the same day. The closing reaction shot could be Hitch listening to a question from earlier on.
@Corrupt140 I'm sure that the interviewer didn't mean any offense by it, but from what I've seen and gathered of Hitchcock, he was easily offended by certain things. LOL Some people are just like that. We don't mean to offend people usually but we will and that's just how it is.
The top two comments are addressing the same issue that he is talking about, however they are jumping to conclusion just like he described. They assume he is pissed off at the interviewer for turning around his words, because of the cut to his face after the comment and since you don't get a follow up it is left as that.
Relativisticism 1 week ago
@Relativisticism That's the magic of cinema
randomperson31 3 days ago
this guy speaks slower than gary barlow, fascinating stuff nevertheless
rockyfan94 2 weeks ago
I'm a little confused about this negativity towards Hitchcock and how Griffith and Eisenstein founded these principles. Did you not hear him: "Which Griffith invented, it's true." He knows what's become before him. Just because he wasn't part of the initial founding creators of cinema doesn't mean his work is invalid or not progressive. Look at his body of work. He's incredible. I watched "Psycho" for the first time a week ago and could not take my eyes from the screen. The control.
SheridanODonnell 2 weeks ago
Hitchcock and Chris Nolan talk and look nit same.
hzhangcom 4 weeks ago
This is great and part of an interview with Hitch that's available on DVD (avail on Netflix), called, "A Talk with Hitchcock". WORTH SEEING!
BMPinc 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey youtubers
If you like Hitchcock you will love my video
Please watch it, i promise you you wont regret it
Thanks, ( this will not let me put on the link,
just search the following on you tube browser, it should be the first video)
erikgeiman
thanks and please watch my video!!!!!!!
it is "The Briefcase"
erikgeiman 3 months ago
did he just take credit for Metric montage and the Kuleshov effect?
probinsiya 3 months ago
@probinsiya he didn't take credit for the Kuleshov effect, he just pointed out this capability of film. Interviewer was hasty to appoint credit.
glaukus666 1 week ago
genius
rejector13 4 months ago 3
Damn I'm learning more watching interviews with Hitchcock than I have from years of studying other sources. Truly the master, not only of suspense, but of cinema.
WalterLiddy 4 months ago 4
@WalterLiddy can't really see what he's teaching that isn't already obvious.
radionr3 4 months ago
dreamBIG fucking amazing song gramatik
nickwcs 5 months ago 4
Gramatik.
aslad 5 months ago
the interviewer's comment was just stupid.
DementedBCecil 6 months ago
The one and only Alfred Hitchcock :)
KeliMutiso 6 months ago
Oh how editing has evolved x3
PantherMarie88 7 months ago
Hitchcock loved Les Diabolique, for good reason.
LeLimeLine 7 months ago
@brassmonkeyjew: uhhh if ur implying that U don't for those particular reasons, then that's stupid. Older movies actually have class and DO make sense if u have a brain when you watch them. Hello? Hitchcock? Casablanca? Streetcar Named Desire? What planet do u come from??
mscinematic40 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5:56 - 6:21 John Carpenter mentioned this sorta thing at 4:33 - :58 on Part 2 of John Carpenter - Halloween Interview.
027220 8 months ago
Comment removed
027220 8 months ago
A man who loves babies. Perfectly innocent....
shanangus 9 months ago
Oh my gosh, this taught me so much!
squaferno 9 months ago
"in the first place we had in it the murder of a woman, of a nude woman. as you know, you could not take the camera of a nude woman ........................... being stabbed to death." LOL
KaiChippi 9 months ago
The irony here is that one gets the impression that Alfred Hitchcock is annoyed with the interviewer when in fact it's the editing.
Ladygagsalot 10 months ago 9
@Corrupt140 why did that statement make him so angry?
MrDrHAZjr 10 months ago
@MrDrHAZjr Honestly, I think the video was just cut after the interviewer asked the question, to a random shot of Hitchcock. If however, it's un-editted, god damn that's funny. The 'Cock was a strange and powerful being.
Corrupt140 9 months ago
jajaajaja el primer plano de su rostro en el efecto kuleshov es increible.
Jeredos 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Psycho is dated and not scary to even babies! sSaw would have made poor old Alfred wet his pantaloons!
brassmonkeyjew 11 months ago
@brassmonkeyjew You are missing the entire purpose of this video. PURE CINEMA. Using cinematic technique to manipulate the audiences emotion. He was a master of the craft and at explaining it in a simple way. Please do not compare his films to the Gorefest that is Saw. Saw was entertaining, but the only emotion I got from it was "god, I hope that never happens to me. That would suck"
Beatmeup66 11 months ago
@Beatmeup66
No one watches old movies cause they are dated and don't make sense anymore cause they are from a time which has passed.
We have evolved since the time of movie infancy when his primitive "technique"was considered progressive... And you should too!
Saw is to Psycho what A monkey is to us humans! But this clip has it's purpose in showing us how far we have come since the stone age of cinema...
brassmonkeyjew 10 months ago
@brassmonkeyjew This is honestly hard to respond to. "No one watches old movies cause they are dated and don't make sense anymore cause they are from a time which has passed." Are you serious? There are so many things wrong with that sentence. In terms of grammar and accuracy. Believe it or not, a lot of people still watch old movies. I have so much more to say but I can already tell it will be a waste of my time.
Beatmeup66 10 months ago 3
@brassmonkeyjew you are a genuine moron, I am not joking, if you honestly believe what you just typed, you are systematically by all of society's intellectual standards a truly dumb person
eltimo12 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eltimo12
I know you are but what am i :>()---
brassmonkeyjew 9 months ago
@brassmonkeyjew You likened Saw to the monkey btw.
ascetica0 9 months ago
@brassmonkeyjew Yo are an idiot!!!!
christophersyn 6 months ago
"Shadow on the curtain"
Hitch: DAMN IT HOW DARE YOU INTERRUPT ME!
generalcircle 11 months ago
Hitchcock on cutting: keep going until you run out of chocolate syrup.
haupper 1 year ago
I loooold at Alfred's silence at the end. He's like "What the fuck you talking about?"
Statistic100 1 year ago
The title should not say "Hitchcock explains about cutting": we don't explain about things, we explain things. Thus, the title should say "Hitchcock explains cutting." There you are.
dcolby5 1 year ago
@dcolby5 Nice cut! ;)
tarnopol 1 year ago
Size of image the create shock
dan2009 1 year ago
All hail the Master!
neerping 1 year ago 4
That was the kuleshov experiment, not the alfred hitchcock experiment. You can call hitchcock a genius, but just remember who explored these ideas in the first place: Eisenstein, Kuleshov, D.W. Griffith, Pudovkin. Alfred Hitchcock only mastered the techniques that filmmakers had already invented.
GOreelz 1 year ago
@GOreelz
This is not quite correct, the way hitchcock manage to build tension in his movies was never seen before. yeah tough, for the last part he refers to kulesov experiment, but his movies are full of brand new ways of cinecrafting
LoomPharade 1 year ago
@LoomPharade I was referring to the last part.
GOreelz 11 months ago
he's is fucking genius
cutepossession 1 year ago
Alfred the Great was great because he gets to the "brass tacks" of what it is all about like Charles the Great (Chaplin). No superfluous B.S.!
brianpadraic 1 year ago
Hey!< did he direct creed's with arms wide open music video??
alberts1985 1 year ago
Owww GOLD!
I like to think I know and understand editing, but I could never explain it as eloquently as Mr Hitchcock, never in a hundred years.
DirectedBySteve 1 year ago
Owww GOLD!
I like to think I know and understand editing, but I could never explain it as eloquently as Mr Hitchcock, never in a hundred years.
DirectedBySteve 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now lets replace the woman in the bikini with an interviewer saying ""or you for it, as it were" and change the shot of a smile, to a frown. Now we a really angry man. lol. All jokes aside hitchcock was a legend.
paintballing489 1 year ago
interviewer: "or you for it, as it were." - Hitchcock: "go fuck yourself."
Corrupt140 1 year ago 59
@Corrupt140 seems like he was giving him a compliment though.
CraigKramer 1 year ago
@CraigKramer That's the same way I took it. The other thing to keep in mind is that the last shot might not have actually been a reaction to the interviewer's comment. It's unlikely this was done with two cameras. They do the interview with the camera trained on Hitch, then later shoot the interviewer whose shot may or may not have even been in the same room as the actual interview or even the same day. The closing reaction shot could be Hitch listening to a question from earlier on.
patbuddha 1 year ago 2
@Corrupt140 I'm sure that the interviewer didn't mean any offense by it, but from what I've seen and gathered of Hitchcock, he was easily offended by certain things. LOL Some people are just like that. We don't mean to offend people usually but we will and that's just how it is.
tall32guy 1 year ago
@Corrupt140 hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
ericdisney1 9 months ago
Hi, Could I ask if you know the source of this clip? Was it a TV interview or is it on a DVD extras package? Regards, Adam
hananas1 1 year ago
ROFL he looks so pissed at the interviewer after he said "or you for it as it were..."
Jimbothy 1 year ago 20
@Jimbothy...naahh.. all the lines were scripted..Hitchcock knew that line was coming.
Atomicflash500 1 year ago
@Jimbothy hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
ericdisney1 9 months ago
@Jimbothy maybe he felt he was sucking up to him, I think Hitch is a quite modest man.
MrNerdyBrit 4 months ago
He's really gifted with explaining flmmaking techniques.
TheWorksful 1 year ago 4
@TheWorksful He's one of the best known and most talented filmmakers of all time. Is this a surprise? LOL :)
tall32guy 1 year ago
Comment removed
sqccccccccc 1 year ago