Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
With BYPASSANYSURVEY(.)TK u can go past any of these surveys out there ! i use it for every survey i do .. delete the ( and )
HateSurveysHate 1 week ago
Comment removed
MacAtk33 2 months ago
The operation of nuclear power plants refers to a number of unresolved questions for Which there is no satisfactory answer. With the term of this deadly technology to grow even more problems. It`s astonishing that this is now even considered yet. It is determined at the instigation of the IAEA, which has failed utterly in every disaster.
People do not want nuclear power plants!
atomunfall 6 months ago in playlist La fin de l'industrie nucléaire
Yes Nuclear Power Energy is definitely an great radiation increasing technology.Is radiation less dangerous than coal smog. I don't know. I can see smog and avoid it but I can't see radiation and thereore cannot avoid it. I also don't like not knowing why I'm sick or what's doing me in. The best works of art music were created before electricity was invented. From darkness we get rest and inspiration. We need darkness for inspiration. Better to have less lights and renewable energy
angelialvares 6 months ago
985.000 deaths as a result of only one nuclear genocide plant,
not enough for nuclear lobby nazis ?
['Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment' the New York Academy of Sciences'].
Stop that madness - nuclear genocide power - no more - no where !
Nuclear lobby to the court .
JucheeTV 6 months ago in playlist La fin de l'industrie nucléaire
legalize Hemp and we can use that for energy combined with solar power can power our whole nation.
free00to00ryhme 8 months ago
More BULL SHIT feed to the American people !
patriciaannpat 8 months ago
nuclear energy is by no means a good idea.The impact is not worth the trade off .the cost is to high and the risk is to risky.they say it has no carbon foot print but that is not true .what i am concerned with is the by product .I would much rather have smog than radioactive fallout.
decycle1 9 months ago
@decycle1 wat is their carbon footprint
blaine215 3 months ago
@decycle1 all the energy ti takes to build one ,not to mention the the big giant hole in the ground from mining uranium.
Then figure in the storage of the spent fuel rods which is at least 100yrs or more.
That is with out considering the all the risk of failure.Jersey,Russia ,now japan 3 is a charm time to quit. America has over 30 reactors which could be considered antique and running dangerously over their intended capacity . if you feel safe the you are just ignoring all the facts
decycle1 3 months ago
Earthquakes will take care of the debate for the next 3000 years, you may as well build thousands of them.
Jai666666666 9 months ago