I'm just going to sit back and enjoy the show of these youtube idiots taking everything personal and arguing about what Stephenson said more than ten years ago in some corny TV show hosted by Gilian Anderson on the Discovery Channel... fun times.
I think he's really just talking about the practicality of it, and not so much being very philosophical. It's like the flying car: interesting sci fi device, plausible, but not a practical option for various reasons. Normal cars and planes already do the job.
Human-like AI is the same as the flying car: People's brains and computers (perhaps better, but much as they are today function-wise) will cover most problems.
He is sooo correct. But for nerds working on AI this is ridicolous. Why? because they only way they are able to reproduce is to build computer which would replicate them.
@Zarrov You are a dumb ass. The point of AI is to build something with the processing power of a computer the memory capacity of a computer and the intelligence of a human. AI has infinite possibilities and infinite power.
@mrhnm yeah, your comment just confirms what I said before. If you are one of those guys working on AI->its no wonder you have uch poor record, since your own inteligence is that of a plant, since you are unable to grasp concept of a joke. Have fun with building AI as useless as you.
@rivethead1982 He has a point to an extent and a limited one at that. Building AI will be a watershed moment for all of science and AI is more powerful than any human being could ever be probably more powerful than we can imagine.
An AI with enough processing power can reduce the time it takes to research anything.
Building silicon brains sounds ok to me, because why not do something useful with all that silicon lying around here, right? Or should we create a big silicon pyramid that we all can stand around and admire, lol.
There's a chance he was being at least partially facetious. He's also operating on the same concept line that he used in The Diamond Age, whereby he surmised that, if you could force human brains to devote most of their processing power to a single problem AND to "cluster" with a large number of others in the same way we can cluster servers or teamed microprocessors, you have the most powerful computer ever made.
I'm pretty sure there will be a breaking point. To many people are scared of losing humanity. Therefore we need to make technology which makes us more aware of our knowledge en enhance it, instead of dumben us down.
Let`s take it one step at a time; teach the brain to masturbate first.
AClarke2007 2 months ago
I'm just going to sit back and enjoy the show of these youtube idiots taking everything personal and arguing about what Stephenson said more than ten years ago in some corny TV show hosted by Gilian Anderson on the Discovery Channel... fun times.
FractalBolt 4 months ago
I think he's really just talking about the practicality of it, and not so much being very philosophical. It's like the flying car: interesting sci fi device, plausible, but not a practical option for various reasons. Normal cars and planes already do the job.
Human-like AI is the same as the flying car: People's brains and computers (perhaps better, but much as they are today function-wise) will cover most problems.
PraxisAxis 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cool haha, check out my channel for my latest machinima a political sci fi fo halloween = i Robot in Snow Crash :D
CelestialElf 1 year ago
LOL so if we want an AI for a war machine we just grab a child and wire it into
the machine. Seems highly inefficient, because the life support would decrease
the ammunition storage capacity. The response time is also not optimal.
tyrbolo 1 year ago
LOL so if we want an AI for a war machine we just grab a child and wire it into
the machine. Seems highly inefficient, because the life support would decrease
the ammunition storage capacity.
tyrbolo 1 year ago
He is sooo correct. But for nerds working on AI this is ridicolous. Why? because they only way they are able to reproduce is to build computer which would replicate them.
Zarrov 1 year ago
@Zarrov You are a dumb ass. The point of AI is to build something with the processing power of a computer the memory capacity of a computer and the intelligence of a human. AI has infinite possibilities and infinite power.
mrhnm 7 months ago
@mrhnm yeah, your comment just confirms what I said before. If you are one of those guys working on AI->its no wonder you have uch poor record, since your own inteligence is that of a plant, since you are unable to grasp concept of a joke. Have fun with building AI as useless as you.
Zarrov 7 months ago
@Zarrov Text is hardly the medium for which to transmit sarcasm.
mrhnm 7 months ago
@mrhnm indeed your right
Zarrov 7 months ago
do we need to understand the universe this deeply???
Tiddlefish 1 year ago 2
Wow, Neal.....Absolutely goddamn right :)
rivethead1982 1 year ago
@rivethead1982 He has a point to an extent and a limited one at that. Building AI will be a watershed moment for all of science and AI is more powerful than any human being could ever be probably more powerful than we can imagine.
An AI with enough processing power can reduce the time it takes to research anything.
mrhnm 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Building silicon brains sounds ok to me, because why not do something useful with all that silicon lying around here, right? Or should we create a big silicon pyramid that we all can stand around and admire, lol.
jandroid66 1 year ago
Comment removed
jandroid66 1 year ago
He has a point, perhaps we should listen. Am I the only one who finds artificial intelligence a scary idea that perhaps shouldn't be taken too far?
JacksonOssea 1 year ago
Well, I think he is damn right.
Joe.
joecounter 1 year ago
That's also the lesson of Frankenstein (the original), you know. Neal Stephenson is quite the classicist.
teldiron 1 year ago
reality differs from person to person
nuggert 1 year ago
There's a chance he was being at least partially facetious. He's also operating on the same concept line that he used in The Diamond Age, whereby he surmised that, if you could force human brains to devote most of their processing power to a single problem AND to "cluster" with a large number of others in the same way we can cluster servers or teamed microprocessors, you have the most powerful computer ever made.
oldthinkertube 2 years ago 8
AI will make humans more and more dumb and weak just as all the modern technology and amneities are doing
maghi85 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure there will be a breaking point. To many people are scared of losing humanity. Therefore we need to make technology which makes us more aware of our knowledge en enhance it, instead of dumben us down.
HaxxBlaster 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Neal betrays a deep misunderstanding of the key advantages of AI:
1) Once you have a working AI then it may be copied inexpensively as much as you like.
2) This applies to the mental modules just as much as the whole AI.
The consequences are that:
3) AIs may move around at close to the speed of light. (space travel)
4) AIs have essentially zero educational costs. (massive economic advantage)
5) AIs will be able to attain much higher competences due to much faster learning. (genuis)
BarnabyLDawson 3 years ago
you misunderstand reality
sdhaimtn 3 years ago 7