Added: 3 years ago
From: J0eCh1p
Views: 6,186
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Let`s take it one step at a time; teach the brain to masturbate first.

  • I'm just going to sit back and enjoy the show of these youtube idiots taking everything personal and arguing about what Stephenson said more than ten years ago in some corny TV show hosted by Gilian Anderson on the Discovery Channel... fun times.

  • I think he's really just talking about the practicality of it, and not so much being very philosophical. It's like the flying car: interesting sci fi device, plausible, but not a practical option for various reasons. Normal cars and planes already do the job.

    Human-like AI is the same as the flying car: People's brains and computers (perhaps better, but much as they are today function-wise) will cover most problems.

  • LOL so if we want an AI for a war machine we just grab a child and wire it into

    the machine. Seems highly inefficient, because the life support would decrease

    the ammunition storage capacity. The response time is also not optimal.

  • LOL so if we want an AI for a war machine we just grab a child and wire it into

    the machine. Seems highly inefficient, because the life support would decrease

    the ammunition storage capacity.

  • He is sooo correct. But for nerds working on AI this is ridicolous. Why? because they only way they are able to reproduce is to build computer which would replicate them.

  • @Zarrov You are a dumb ass. The point of AI is to build something with the processing power of a computer the memory capacity of a computer and the intelligence of a human. AI has infinite possibilities and infinite power. 

  • @mrhnm yeah, your comment just confirms what I said before. If you are one of those guys working on AI->its no wonder you have uch poor record, since your own inteligence is that of a plant, since you are unable to grasp concept of a joke. Have fun with building AI as useless as you.

  • @Zarrov Text is hardly the medium for which to transmit sarcasm.

  • @mrhnm indeed your right

  • do we need to understand the universe this deeply???

  • Wow, Neal.....Absolutely goddamn right :)

  • @rivethead1982 He has a point to an extent and a limited one at that. Building AI will be a watershed moment for all of science and AI is more powerful than any human being could ever be probably more powerful than we can imagine.

    An AI with enough processing power can reduce the time it takes to research anything.

  • Comment removed

  • He has a point, perhaps we should listen. Am I the only one who finds artificial intelligence a scary idea that perhaps shouldn't be taken too far?

  • Well, I think he is damn right.

    Joe.

  • That's also the lesson of Frankenstein (the original), you know. Neal Stephenson is quite the classicist.

  • reality differs from person to person

  • There's a chance he was being at least partially facetious. He's also operating on the same concept line that he used in The Diamond Age, whereby he surmised that, if you could force human brains to devote most of their processing power to a single problem AND to "cluster" with a large number of others in the same way we can cluster servers or teamed microprocessors, you have the most powerful computer ever made.

  • AI will make humans more and more dumb and weak just as all the modern technology and amneities are doing

  • I'm pretty sure there will be a breaking point. To many people are scared of losing humanity. Therefore we need to make technology which makes us more aware of our knowledge en enhance it, instead of dumben us down.

  • you misunderstand reality

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more